This document discusses and analyzes several music video theories: 1) Michael Shore's theory that music videos promote exaggerated male fantasies, which is supported by examples like Nicki Minaj's "Anaconda" video. 2) Sven E. Carlsson's theory that music videos analyze opposites like trash/art and male/female, pushing narratives through contrasting scenarios. 3) Examples of videos like Usher's "Let It Burn" are discussed in relation to how they support Carlsson's theory of using opposites. 4) The author agrees with avoiding fantasies but disagrees that all videos do this, saying some promote social issues. They will avoid pornography and fantas

3. MUSIC VIDEO’S THAT BACK UP THIS THEORY
Nicki Minaj’s Anaconda
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDZX4ooRsWs)
This theory is shown in the Anaconda video, this expresses signs of
pornography when Nicki is in theopen rubbing waterover over her half
naked body. Also females showing signs of teasing of each others
body’s.

4. MUSIC VIDEO’S THAT BACK UP THIS THEORY’’
Busta rhymes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j47MYli8pj4)
This video show’s the girls showing a fair amount of pornography with the
females Michael Shore’s theory is really stressed hear when he
mentions male fantasies here is a perfect image to back up his Theory.
Male fantasy
come true.

5. SVEN E CARLSSON
Sven E Carlsson theory is quite straight forward he
believed that one of the most common methods
of analyzing is to break up music video’s. Almost
everything is perceived as opposites for
example: trash or art, male or female and
commerce or creativity.
What this basically means is that music video’s
use this common approach of push the narration
through opposite scenario's.

6. HOW IS SVEN E CARLSSON THEROY PROVED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5XNWFw5HVw
Ushers-let it burn
This image explains part of Carlson's
theory because it shows how usher
creates the fire of his hand and how the
burn represents his fiery relationship
NE-YO- Coming with
you
This image represents a pointless
dance routine which will make no sense
in the eyes Sven E carlsson, he which
class this trash, because there is no
meaning of girls in there 20s dancing in
skimpy outfits.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lv5RWCQsZIU

7. HOW WILL MY UNDERSTANDING OF THESE
THEORIES EFFECT OUR MUSIC VIDEO’S
I partially agree with Michael Shore’s theory because I don’t like prompting
fantasies for male by women demeaning themselves in front of a
camera for money but I disagree with the fact he says that “ Music
video's are exaggerated because not all of them. Music video’s can also
promote issues in the world which need to be resolved for example.
so our video will not contain any pornography and will not be creating
fantasies for the adolescent males.
Homosexualit
y
Sucide
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=todrick+hall+gets+betterTodrick hall it gets better-

8. HOW WILL MY UNDERSTANDING OF THESE
THEORIES EFFECT OUR MUSIC VIDEO’S
Carrlsson’s theory will inspire our music video to be as artistic as possible
because he believes that a video can be either one way or another so
my group will not have as he say’s trashy video so that will effect us be
more creative, but I disagree when he says male or female because
there are many video that express interests of both male and female
with equal qualities For example
No air
Chris brown Jordin
sparks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBKnpyoFEBo