This document summarizes the Dutch approach to compensating victims of mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure. It discusses the case of Piet, a Dutch man who was exposed to asbestos while working in the Netherlands and Australia. While Piet may be unable to get full compensation in the Netherlands due to time limits and lack of documentation, he was able to receive compensation in Australia within 7 weeks through their Dust Diseases Tribunal, which has a more flexible process. The document recommends that the Netherlands adopts a similar tribunal approach and updates its compensation system to be more in line with international standards.

1. Never say you don’t know
Consider it your room to grow..
Lydia Charlier
European Asbestos Forum
27 may 2015
beeradvocaten
The Dutch solution for
mesothelioma victims

2. • Minister Asscher*:
– Nobody should undergo diseases, disablement or
even death, caused by his work!
– We need to look closely and learn from asbestos
cases!
– We need to listen to doctors, and victims!
* Minister of Social Affairs
beeradvocaten
Most recent annual report on
Dutch mesothelioma victims

3. • Short overview of the Dutch asbestos context
• Piet’s case
• The Dutch approach
• The Australian (NSW) way
• Again: Piet’s case
• Recommendations: Room to grow
beeradvocaten
d

4. • Import asbestos in Holland: a total of 1,4 billion kg’s*
• Mainly in buildings, shipyards
• Occupational health issue and public health issue:
domestic/environmental exposure
• Import peak: 1975
• expected in 1998: 20.000 victims
• 1978: first legislation, total ban: 1993
• 1988: first litigation, 1998: Supreme Court
• 1998: Convenant Asbest Slachtoffers**
• 2000: Instituut Asbest Slachtoffers (IAS)
* 1,4 miljoen ton: Asbest tot in de vezels van de samenleving, onderzoek in opdracht van Greenpeace Nederland,
contrast Advies, Amersfoort: www.xs4all.nl/~contrast/publicaties/asbesteindrapport.pdf.
** Agreement between Government/employers/insurance companies/unions
beeradvocaten
The Dutch asbestos context

5. • Born in Holland on 6 february 1938
• 1957: asbestos worker at Hertel in Holland –
insulation industry
• 1958 Australia – New South Wales
• 1959: asbestos worker at James Hardie & Coy
Pty Ltd (NSW)
• 1959 -1961: asbestos worker at Bell’s
Asbestos & Engineering Ltd (NSW)
• 1963-1964: asbestos worker at Hertel
beeradvocaten
Piet’s case

6. • Diagnosis november 2014: mesothelioma
• Passed away:18 march 2015
beeradvocaten
50 years later

7. • Claim in Holland?
• Claim in NSW?
beeradvocaten
Piet made some enquiries

8. IAS*:
• Founded in 2000
• Government/employers/insurance
companies/unions
• free of charge for victims
• Highly qualified organisation
• Instituut Asbest Slachtoffers
• Institute form Asbestos Victims
beeradvocaten
The Dutch approach

9. • Check of diagnosis – NMP*
• Investigation of facts: employment contracts,
exposure, where, when, how, witness
statements, liable parties
• Opinion on liability and Statute of Limitations
• Report
• “Mediation”
• to be concluded within 6 months
• Nederlands Mesotheliomen Panel: Dutch Mesothelioma Panel
beeradvocaten
What to expect

10. • advance payment on general damages (non pecuniary
damages):
– Pain and suffering
– Loss of amenities
– Loss of enjoyment of life
– Loss of life expectancy
• € 19.417,00 - fixed: payable by SVB* within 2-3 months
• All mesothelioma victims (diagnosed, whether liable party or not) are
eligible to be awarded this compensation
* Sociale Verzekeringsbank: Dutch Social Security beeradvocaten
Meanwhile: Regeling TAS

11. • Liability accepted by employer (47%):
– General damages: fixed: € 56.464,00
– Pecuniary damages: fixed: € 3.142,00*
– Bereavement: fixed: € 3.142,00*
– Total amount of € 62.748,00
– No burden of proof
– Additional damages: burden of proof
• Liability denied or no liable party (53%):
TAS: € 19.417,00
• Case closed
beeradvocaten
Compensation

12. • Insufficient individual proof of exposure (too
long ago, no witnesses!)
• No specific database on exposure facts*
• Time limits! 30 years+
• Mediation by IAS: only non committed,
voluntary participation or payment on the
employers side; no enforceable ruling
*only general database: “asbestkaart”, www.asbestkaart.nl
beeradvocaten
Obstructions to obtain “full”
compensation

13. • Very low compensation for general damages, even in
Dutch terms… (25% of what may be expected for
similar injury, different cause)
• Even more so in international terms!
• No compensation for individual loss of life expectancy:
fixed compensation for all ages..
• Case law has adjusted tot Agreement: in legal
procedures similar compensation
beeradvocaten
Character of compensation

14. Results of IAS in the past 15
years
• Total requests: 6934: handled until 2014: 6541 cases
• 20,3% of all handled requests (1333 cases) denied
• 80,7% (5601 cases) received compensation
• 47% (2213 cases) get fully compensated with fixed
general damages (€ 56,464.00) and other damages
( fixed 6,284.00, total of € 62.748,00*
*no burden of proof
• 53% (2478 cases) only received TAS: € 19.417,00
beeradvocaten

15. The Australian way in NSW
• 1989: Dust Diseases Tribunal (DDT)*
• Active judge, available on all days and hours
• The world is his territory
• DDT data base of asbestos related facts, both medical
and historical, to be used in every case
• Flexible burden of proof
• Fast execution
• Enforceable ruling on causation and liability within
weeks, even days
• NO limitation period*
* Dust Diseases Tribunal Act 1989 (NSW), s. 6;
** Section 12 A, Dust Tribunal Act 1998
beeradvocaten

16. No difference between NSW and The
Netherlands
•Workers
•Domestic exposure victims
•Environmental exposure victims
•Peak: 2020 – 2021
•Number of diagnosed victims 2013: 575
•Number of diagnosed victims 2013 NSW: 158
•AMR (Australian Mesothelioma Registry):
– 61% occupational exposure
– 33,1% other
– 6% indefinite
beeradvocaten
Claimants

17. No difference between NSW and the Netherlands
•employer, or employer’s workers compensation insurer
•The occupier of the site where victim worked
•The manufacturers of the asbestos products
•The State Government or the Federal Government for exposure such as
with government bodies
•The spouse’s employer in the case of women exposed when washing
their husband’s overalls
•The parents employer in the case of children with bystander exposure
•The mining companies who mined raw asbestos
•Ship building companies
beeradvocaten
liable parties

18. • General damages
– Pain and suffering
– Loss of enjoyment of life
– Loss of life expectancy
• Pecuniary damages
– Full compensation
– Legal costs: compensation by liable party
beeradvocaten
Damages

19. • General damages (smartengeld) :
Range: $ 250,000 - $500,000 (€ 175.138 - € 350.270)
Loss of life expectancy: based on individual:
$ 1000,00 per “lost”year
• Pecuniary damages: full compensation
beeradvocaten
Compensation

20. • No compensation? NO!
• “Safety net” for workers:
• Worked in NSW but no recollection or proof:
– benefits from the NSW Dust Diseases Board
• No “safety net” for those who don’t recall any
exposure outside occupational context at all.
However: this is very rarely found!
beeradvocaten
No liable party?

21. • In Holland:
– most likely time barred (1964 – early exposure)
– Maximum compensation: € 19.417,00
– To be refunded in case of compensation from
abroad or otherwise
beeradvocaten
Facts: Piet’s case in Holland

22. • In NSW
– Request was filed at DDT on 9 january 2015
– Compensation in line with NSW standards received
within 7 weeks
beeradvocaten
Facts: Piet’s case in NSW

23. •The Dutch way was a good start
•However: in 2015 the NSW differences in
procedures and compensation should prompt us
to think again
•In view of globalization it is time form the Dutch
system to mature
•NSW sets the good example
•There is plenty of room to grow
beeradvocaten
In conclusion:

24. Recommendations to Minister Asscher:
• Keep the Regeling TAS for those who cannot find a liable
person at all, in occupational, domestic of environmental
exposure cases; but upgrade compensation
• Instead of mediation by IAS create an expert Dust Diseases
Tribunal; create enforceable rulings to ensure compensation
• Let go of non committed mediation
• Let go of unjust and unreasonable limitation period of 30 yrs
• Create a database to be used in future cases
• Sustain flexible proof deriving from this database
• Create an individual compensation of life expectancy
• Let go of current fixed compensation of general damages in
case of liable employer, upgrade compensation in line with
international standards
beeradvocaten
Recommendations:
plenty of room to grow

25. Look closely, but do not only look
•
Listen closely, but do not only listen
•
Hear,
What victims have to say.
beeradvocaten
Minister Asscher: