land Law PPT.pptx
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•5 views
This document summarizes a property dispute case in Mumbai, India. It describes the original ownership of the land, an agreement for a portion to be sold in 1979, termination of that agreement in 2005 for non-payment, and a subsequent attempted sale in 2011. The appellants challenged the approval of this sale. While the High Court declined to intervene, the Supreme Court found procedural issues with the hearing and set aside the approval, remanding the case for reconsideration. The case demonstrates the importance of procedural fairness in legal proceedings.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Case analysis of kenanga innovasi sdn bhd v toh kin lam
The plaintiff purchased agricultural land from the defendants but is seeking a refund of excess purchase price paid. The defendants counterclaimed for unpaid interest. There were oral negotiations for extensions of time to pay the balance that were affirmed in letters. While the negotiations were oral, the plaintiff's actions showed acceptance of the terms by paying interest for several extensions. When the plaintiff failed to pay the balance by the final extended deadline, the defendants terminated the sale agreement. The court found for the defendants, holding that the oral negotiations were accepted and the plaintiff breached the contract by not paying the balance on time.
Rcs no 332 98 (possession)
This document is a court judgment from the Court of Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. Barshi at Barshi, India. It details a lawsuit filed by Trimbak Aagatrao against the Grampanchayat Khandvi and several individuals. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the disputed land and sought an order directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and an injunction preventing obstruction of his possession. The court examined documents establishing the plaintiff's title and found in his favor, directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and restraining the other defendants from obstructing his possession. Costs were not awarded to either party to prevent further conflict.
Land Dispute
The Purchaser purchased Ground Floor alone and while purchasing Ground Floor the Seller agreed not to construct Second Floor. But the First Floor Purchaser, planned to construct Second Floor and the Ground Floor Purchaser success before the Court
Hema khattar vs. shiv khera (2017)
1) The case involved a dispute between a contractor (Appellant 1) and client (Respondent) regarding a construction project, as well as a subsequent oral agreement replacing Appellant 1 with Appellant 2 to oversee construction.
2) The Respondent filed to stay the civil suit under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, arguing the disputes were subject to arbitration clauses in the written and oral agreements.
3) The Supreme Court ruled the appellants could jointly file the suit and it was not misjoinder. It also ruled the disputes must be referred to the sole arbitrator previously appointed, as per the arbitration clauses.
Case review of (2010)7 N.W.L.R (pt. 1192) by Ejeme Ikekhua
Case review of UMORU V. IJUMU LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCIL PAGE 1
EDOHOEKET V. INYANG PAGE 25
IGWE V. EZEANOCHIER PAGE 61
Pp9
1) The plaintiff sought a declaration that a deed transferring land to the defendants be declared void, alleging it was obtained through fraud. The trial court ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
2) On appeal, the defendants argued the causes of action were misjoined. However, the court found the plaintiff only raised issues regarding invalidating the deed, not declaring title.
3) The court also held that even if both causes of action were raised, this would be allowed. Declaring a deed invalid is consequential to declaring title. The standard of proof in allegations of fraud is a balance of probabilities.
Court judgement
1. This suit is filed by the plaintiff S.M. Lakshmi Reddy seeking a declaration of their right and title over a property located in Survey No. 163 of Mandagiri village.
2. The plaintiff claims to have purchased the property from defendant No. 1 (a partner of Shobha Estates) in 1991, but defendants 2-4 claim to have purchased the same property through sale deeds executed in 2009 and 2010.
3. The plaintiff alleges these subsequent sale deeds are not valid and seeks an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession of the property.
OS No 261/2015
1. The plaintiff filed a suit seeking a declaration of his right and title over a plot of land, claiming he purchased it in 1991 based on a registered sale deed (Ex.A1) executed by the defendant No.1 who was a partner in Shobha Estates.
2. However, the defendants claim right and title based on subsequent sale deeds - defendant Nos. 2 and 3 claim right based on a 2009 sale deed (Ex.A2) executed by defendant No.1, and defendant No. 4 claims right based on a 2010 purchase from defendant Nos. 2 and 3.
3. The court must determine which party has valid right and title to the property based on the evidence and documents provided
Recommended
Case analysis of kenanga innovasi sdn bhd v toh kin lam
The plaintiff purchased agricultural land from the defendants but is seeking a refund of excess purchase price paid. The defendants counterclaimed for unpaid interest. There were oral negotiations for extensions of time to pay the balance that were affirmed in letters. While the negotiations were oral, the plaintiff's actions showed acceptance of the terms by paying interest for several extensions. When the plaintiff failed to pay the balance by the final extended deadline, the defendants terminated the sale agreement. The court found for the defendants, holding that the oral negotiations were accepted and the plaintiff breached the contract by not paying the balance on time.
Rcs no 332 98 (possession)
This document is a court judgment from the Court of Jt. Civil Judge, J.D. Barshi at Barshi, India. It details a lawsuit filed by Trimbak Aagatrao against the Grampanchayat Khandvi and several individuals. The plaintiff claimed ownership of the disputed land and sought an order directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and an injunction preventing obstruction of his possession. The court examined documents establishing the plaintiff's title and found in his favor, directing the Grampanchayat to record his name and restraining the other defendants from obstructing his possession. Costs were not awarded to either party to prevent further conflict.
Land Dispute
The Purchaser purchased Ground Floor alone and while purchasing Ground Floor the Seller agreed not to construct Second Floor. But the First Floor Purchaser, planned to construct Second Floor and the Ground Floor Purchaser success before the Court
Hema khattar vs. shiv khera (2017)
1) The case involved a dispute between a contractor (Appellant 1) and client (Respondent) regarding a construction project, as well as a subsequent oral agreement replacing Appellant 1 with Appellant 2 to oversee construction.
2) The Respondent filed to stay the civil suit under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, arguing the disputes were subject to arbitration clauses in the written and oral agreements.
3) The Supreme Court ruled the appellants could jointly file the suit and it was not misjoinder. It also ruled the disputes must be referred to the sole arbitrator previously appointed, as per the arbitration clauses.
Case review of (2010)7 N.W.L.R (pt. 1192) by Ejeme Ikekhua
Case review of UMORU V. IJUMU LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCIL PAGE 1
EDOHOEKET V. INYANG PAGE 25
IGWE V. EZEANOCHIER PAGE 61
Pp9
1) The plaintiff sought a declaration that a deed transferring land to the defendants be declared void, alleging it was obtained through fraud. The trial court ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
2) On appeal, the defendants argued the causes of action were misjoined. However, the court found the plaintiff only raised issues regarding invalidating the deed, not declaring title.
3) The court also held that even if both causes of action were raised, this would be allowed. Declaring a deed invalid is consequential to declaring title. The standard of proof in allegations of fraud is a balance of probabilities.
Court judgement
1. This suit is filed by the plaintiff S.M. Lakshmi Reddy seeking a declaration of their right and title over a property located in Survey No. 163 of Mandagiri village.
2. The plaintiff claims to have purchased the property from defendant No. 1 (a partner of Shobha Estates) in 1991, but defendants 2-4 claim to have purchased the same property through sale deeds executed in 2009 and 2010.
3. The plaintiff alleges these subsequent sale deeds are not valid and seeks an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with their possession of the property.
OS No 261/2015
1. The plaintiff filed a suit seeking a declaration of his right and title over a plot of land, claiming he purchased it in 1991 based on a registered sale deed (Ex.A1) executed by the defendant No.1 who was a partner in Shobha Estates.
2. However, the defendants claim right and title based on subsequent sale deeds - defendant Nos. 2 and 3 claim right based on a 2009 sale deed (Ex.A2) executed by defendant No.1, and defendant No. 4 claims right based on a 2010 purchase from defendant Nos. 2 and 3.
3. The court must determine which party has valid right and title to the property based on the evidence and documents provided
Sultana safiana
This document is a court judgment regarding a civil revision petition filed to challenge a trial court's order rejecting the defendant's application to frame a preliminary issue in a civil suit. The trial court had refused to frame a preliminary issue on whether the suit was maintainable in view of there being no consideration for the alleged oral agreement between the parties as per Section 25 of the Contract Act. The High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that the trial court was justified in finding that the issue of consideration involved mixed questions of law and fact that could not be decided in a preliminary issue. The High Court also held that the revision was not maintainable against an order refusing to frame a preliminary issue.
equity assist diligent not the tardy
The court allowed the appellant's appeal to execute a judgment obtained in 1999 against the respondents. The court found that the appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in execution, including the respondents' appeals up to the Federal Court and a related suit filed by one respondent. The court also found that the respondents' actions induced the appellant's delay and they could not rely on limitation statutes. Finally, the appellant did not seek additional interest for the delay so there was no prejudice to the respondents. The court upheld the equitable maxim that "equity assists the diligent, not the tardy."
Registrar's Caveat
Registrar's Caveat under Land Law II.
Contains;
1. Function of a Registrar
2. Effects of Registrar's Caveat
3. Who can apply for Registrar's Caveat
4. Remedy of an Aggrieved Party under RC
5. Cases involved
Pp12
This document summarizes a court case in Sri Lanka regarding the dismissal of a civil case.
The key details are:
1) The plaintiff filed a case seeking damages from the defendant. On a trial date, the plaintiff was present but his attorney was absent. The court refused the plaintiff's request for an adjournment and dismissed the case.
2) The plaintiff argued the dismissal was contrary to law and that the judge should have allowed the case to proceed instead of dismissing it.
3) The court found that since the plaintiff had an attorney, he could not represent himself or request an adjournment without the attorney present. The dismissal is therefore treated as an ex-parte order,
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding the refund of excess toll tax collected. The Cantonment Board floated tenders for collecting toll tax on commercial vehicles. Respondents 1 and 2 bid Rs. 1.02 lakh per day but later matched another bid of Rs. 1.25 lakh to collect the tax. When the higher bid petition was dismissed, the High Court ordered a refund of the excess amount to Respondents 1 and 2. The Supreme Court overturned this, finding no prejudice was caused to Respondents 1 and 2 by matching the higher bid voluntarily.
cpc presentation case law of cpc main impo
This case concerns an appeal to set aside a property sale conducted by a court-appointed commissioner. The key facts are:
1) The appellant purchased the disputed property at a court auction for Rs. 12 lakhs.
2) One respondent filed an application to set aside the sale, claiming another party was willing to pay Rs. 18 lakhs. However, this alleged purchaser failed to appear in court on three occasions.
3) The High Court set aside the sale, finding inadequate notice and publicity of the sale.
4) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the sale. It found no requirement to publish newspaper notices and adequate publicity was given. Further, no
Call for review of ET judgment at a hearing for wasted costs
Dear Sir/Madam
Could you please ask Judge Harper to review her Judgment as attached.
Yours Faithfully
Douglas
Summary of cases week 6
This document summarizes two legal cases. The first case involves a plaintiff who had an agreement with the defendant to purchase a property but wanted to enforce it after 10 years. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, finding it was vexatious and malicious given the long delay. The second case involves a shipping company that delivered goods to the wrong person not in possession of the bill of lading. The court found it had jurisdiction over the case and dismissed the defendant's argument that the matter should go to arbitration per the charter agreement terms.
pepas.pptx
1. Karan Singh filed a suit in the subordinate court regarding land possession and valued the suit themselves at Rs. 2,950. The subordinate court ruled in favor of the defendants. Karan Singh then appealed to the district court.
2. The district court also ruled against Karan Singh. It was then determined that the correct valuation of the suit was Rs. 9,980, meaning the appeal should have gone to the high court instead of district court.
3. The Supreme Court ruled that while the district court technically did not have jurisdiction due to the undervaluation, Karan Singh could not claim prejudice since the undervaluation was due to their own actions. The ruling of the district court
Ca phc 75_99_2
This document is a court ruling from the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka regarding a land dispute case. It summarizes that the original ruling from the Provincial High Court set aside the magistrate's determination regarding the disputed land. However, the Court of Appeal found that the High Court's grounds for setting aside the determination were unsustainable. Specifically, the identity of the disputed land had been properly established and notices had been correctly posted. There was also evidence that a breach of peace had occurred. Therefore, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and reinstated the magistrate's original order regarding the disputed land.
Dewing v. Abarta Oil & Gas Co. - PA Superior Court Ruling
Decision in case where landowners claimed because the driller did not pay annual rent payments (for non-drilling) in a timely manner, it released them from the lease. The PA Superior Court disagreed and found for the drillers.
Contracts ppt.pptx
This landmark case from 1893 established the concept of "invitation to offer". The case involved Mr. Harvey attempting to purchase land from Mr. Facey via telegram. In the telegrams, Mr. Facey stated the lowest price for the land but did not explicitly offer to sell. The court ruled that Mr. Facey's response was an invitation for further negotiation rather than a definitive offer, as there was no clear acceptance communicated. This case clarified the distinction between an invitation to offer information and a clear, communicated offer that can form a legally binding contract.
Exparte injunction
The Supreme Court summarized the key principles for granting ex-parte (one side represented) interim injunctions:
1) Irreparable harm to the plaintiff if not granted and greater injustice would occur from refusal compared to grant.
2) The plaintiff notified the defendant at the earliest time.
3) The plaintiff did not acquiesce or delay in applying.
4) The plaintiff acted in good faith and showed a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss.
5) Any ex-parte injunction would be temporary to limit harm until the full hearing.
Pp3
(1) The 3rd and 4th defendants jointly filed a claim disputing the plaintiff's claims with a registered attorney. On the trial date, the attorney was absent. The 4th defendant was present but unrepresented. The judge improperly allowed the 4th defendant to cross-examine witnesses and present their case without legal representation.
(2) Normally, as long as a party has an attorney on record, that attorney must represent them in court. By allowing the 4th defendant to participate without counsel, the judge deprived them of their right to legal representation and to invoke legal remedies after the fact.
(3) The judge did not follow proper procedures by allowing the 4th defendant to participate without counsel when
Ece v LB Newham (EAT)
This document summarizes an appeal hearing regarding a request for review of an earlier employment tribunal decision. It discusses:
1) The background of the case involving an appeal by Mr. Ece of a decision by the London Borough of Newham employment tribunal.
2) The chairman initially indicated the review request would be heard by the tribunal, but later refused the request, finding it had no reasonable prospect of success.
3) The appellant argued there was procedural error in the chairman changing his decision, but the tribunal found no error, as the rules allow the chairman to refuse a request without a hearing if it has no reasonable prospect of success.
Eon Bank v Sathiaseelan
This document discusses two applications seeking to set aside a Deputy Registrar's order amending a judgment. The judgment was in a case where a bank sued guarantors of a defaulting company's loan. The DR had allowed amendment to specify that two defendants were jointly and severally liable based on consent by their lawyers. The applications argued the DR lacked jurisdiction to amend a judge's judgment and there was undue delay in the amendment application. The court considered whether the applicable procedural rules allowed the DR to make such an amendment order.
208080592 remedial-cases-2
homework help,online homework help,online tutors,online tutoring,research paper help,do my homework,
https://www.homeworkping.com/
304138-2020-Dayandayan_v._Spouses_Rojas20210531-12-1vu0b68.pdf
1) The petitioners have been residing on the subject property for several decades before the respondents purchased it in 1997. The respondents filed a complaint for unlawful detainer against the petitioners to recover possession, claiming they allowed the petitioners to stay on the property.
2) The MCTC ruled in favor of the respondents, but the RTC reversed, finding lack of evidence that the respondents tolerated the petitioners' presence. The CA reversed the RTC.
3) The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that as lawful occupants for decades prior, the respondents cannot use an unlawful detainer case to wrest possession, and must instead file the proper action (reivindicatoria or publiciana)
Scottish Letting Day 2019 - Biosphere Green
The document provides information about the Scottish Letting Day 2019 conference and exhibition that took place on November 12, 2019. It includes the schedule of sessions on various topics related to property letting in Scotland. Some of the sessions covered obtaining repossession orders from the First-tier Tribunal, compliance with the letting agent code of practice, and using LinkedIn effectively for business development. The document acts as an agenda and guide for attendees of the conference.
citimortgage robo signers
The Court of Appeals affirms the lower court's granting of summary judgment to CitiMortgage in a foreclosure action. Maria Potvin argued she was entitled to relief under the Home Affordable Modification Program and that foreclosure was inequitable, but the court found the mediation was non-binding and she did not sign the modification agreement or make payments. The court also found the affidavit from CitiMortgage in support of summary judgment met evidentiary rules for records of regularly conducted business activities. Therefore, the appeals court denied all of Potvin's assignments of error and upheld the foreclosure.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
More Related Content
Similar to land Law PPT.pptx
Sultana safiana
This document is a court judgment regarding a civil revision petition filed to challenge a trial court's order rejecting the defendant's application to frame a preliminary issue in a civil suit. The trial court had refused to frame a preliminary issue on whether the suit was maintainable in view of there being no consideration for the alleged oral agreement between the parties as per Section 25 of the Contract Act. The High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that the trial court was justified in finding that the issue of consideration involved mixed questions of law and fact that could not be decided in a preliminary issue. The High Court also held that the revision was not maintainable against an order refusing to frame a preliminary issue.
equity assist diligent not the tardy
The court allowed the appellant's appeal to execute a judgment obtained in 1999 against the respondents. The court found that the appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in execution, including the respondents' appeals up to the Federal Court and a related suit filed by one respondent. The court also found that the respondents' actions induced the appellant's delay and they could not rely on limitation statutes. Finally, the appellant did not seek additional interest for the delay so there was no prejudice to the respondents. The court upheld the equitable maxim that "equity assists the diligent, not the tardy."
Registrar's Caveat
Registrar's Caveat under Land Law II.
Contains;
1. Function of a Registrar
2. Effects of Registrar's Caveat
3. Who can apply for Registrar's Caveat
4. Remedy of an Aggrieved Party under RC
5. Cases involved
Pp12
This document summarizes a court case in Sri Lanka regarding the dismissal of a civil case.
The key details are:
1) The plaintiff filed a case seeking damages from the defendant. On a trial date, the plaintiff was present but his attorney was absent. The court refused the plaintiff's request for an adjournment and dismissed the case.
2) The plaintiff argued the dismissal was contrary to law and that the judge should have allowed the case to proceed instead of dismissing it.
3) The court found that since the plaintiff had an attorney, he could not represent himself or request an adjournment without the attorney present. The dismissal is therefore treated as an ex-parte order,
Cantonment board vs. k.p.singh
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case regarding the refund of excess toll tax collected. The Cantonment Board floated tenders for collecting toll tax on commercial vehicles. Respondents 1 and 2 bid Rs. 1.02 lakh per day but later matched another bid of Rs. 1.25 lakh to collect the tax. When the higher bid petition was dismissed, the High Court ordered a refund of the excess amount to Respondents 1 and 2. The Supreme Court overturned this, finding no prejudice was caused to Respondents 1 and 2 by matching the higher bid voluntarily.
cpc presentation case law of cpc main impo
This case concerns an appeal to set aside a property sale conducted by a court-appointed commissioner. The key facts are:
1) The appellant purchased the disputed property at a court auction for Rs. 12 lakhs.
2) One respondent filed an application to set aside the sale, claiming another party was willing to pay Rs. 18 lakhs. However, this alleged purchaser failed to appear in court on three occasions.
3) The High Court set aside the sale, finding inadequate notice and publicity of the sale.
4) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the sale. It found no requirement to publish newspaper notices and adequate publicity was given. Further, no
Call for review of ET judgment at a hearing for wasted costs
Dear Sir/Madam
Could you please ask Judge Harper to review her Judgment as attached.
Yours Faithfully
Douglas
Summary of cases week 6
This document summarizes two legal cases. The first case involves a plaintiff who had an agreement with the defendant to purchase a property but wanted to enforce it after 10 years. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim, finding it was vexatious and malicious given the long delay. The second case involves a shipping company that delivered goods to the wrong person not in possession of the bill of lading. The court found it had jurisdiction over the case and dismissed the defendant's argument that the matter should go to arbitration per the charter agreement terms.
pepas.pptx
1. Karan Singh filed a suit in the subordinate court regarding land possession and valued the suit themselves at Rs. 2,950. The subordinate court ruled in favor of the defendants. Karan Singh then appealed to the district court.
2. The district court also ruled against Karan Singh. It was then determined that the correct valuation of the suit was Rs. 9,980, meaning the appeal should have gone to the high court instead of district court.
3. The Supreme Court ruled that while the district court technically did not have jurisdiction due to the undervaluation, Karan Singh could not claim prejudice since the undervaluation was due to their own actions. The ruling of the district court
Ca phc 75_99_2
This document is a court ruling from the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka regarding a land dispute case. It summarizes that the original ruling from the Provincial High Court set aside the magistrate's determination regarding the disputed land. However, the Court of Appeal found that the High Court's grounds for setting aside the determination were unsustainable. Specifically, the identity of the disputed land had been properly established and notices had been correctly posted. There was also evidence that a breach of peace had occurred. Therefore, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and reinstated the magistrate's original order regarding the disputed land.
Dewing v. Abarta Oil & Gas Co. - PA Superior Court Ruling
Decision in case where landowners claimed because the driller did not pay annual rent payments (for non-drilling) in a timely manner, it released them from the lease. The PA Superior Court disagreed and found for the drillers.
Contracts ppt.pptx
This landmark case from 1893 established the concept of "invitation to offer". The case involved Mr. Harvey attempting to purchase land from Mr. Facey via telegram. In the telegrams, Mr. Facey stated the lowest price for the land but did not explicitly offer to sell. The court ruled that Mr. Facey's response was an invitation for further negotiation rather than a definitive offer, as there was no clear acceptance communicated. This case clarified the distinction between an invitation to offer information and a clear, communicated offer that can form a legally binding contract.
Exparte injunction
The Supreme Court summarized the key principles for granting ex-parte (one side represented) interim injunctions:
1) Irreparable harm to the plaintiff if not granted and greater injustice would occur from refusal compared to grant.
2) The plaintiff notified the defendant at the earliest time.
3) The plaintiff did not acquiesce or delay in applying.
4) The plaintiff acted in good faith and showed a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable loss.
5) Any ex-parte injunction would be temporary to limit harm until the full hearing.
Pp3
(1) The 3rd and 4th defendants jointly filed a claim disputing the plaintiff's claims with a registered attorney. On the trial date, the attorney was absent. The 4th defendant was present but unrepresented. The judge improperly allowed the 4th defendant to cross-examine witnesses and present their case without legal representation.
(2) Normally, as long as a party has an attorney on record, that attorney must represent them in court. By allowing the 4th defendant to participate without counsel, the judge deprived them of their right to legal representation and to invoke legal remedies after the fact.
(3) The judge did not follow proper procedures by allowing the 4th defendant to participate without counsel when
Ece v LB Newham (EAT)
This document summarizes an appeal hearing regarding a request for review of an earlier employment tribunal decision. It discusses:
1) The background of the case involving an appeal by Mr. Ece of a decision by the London Borough of Newham employment tribunal.
2) The chairman initially indicated the review request would be heard by the tribunal, but later refused the request, finding it had no reasonable prospect of success.
3) The appellant argued there was procedural error in the chairman changing his decision, but the tribunal found no error, as the rules allow the chairman to refuse a request without a hearing if it has no reasonable prospect of success.
Eon Bank v Sathiaseelan
This document discusses two applications seeking to set aside a Deputy Registrar's order amending a judgment. The judgment was in a case where a bank sued guarantors of a defaulting company's loan. The DR had allowed amendment to specify that two defendants were jointly and severally liable based on consent by their lawyers. The applications argued the DR lacked jurisdiction to amend a judge's judgment and there was undue delay in the amendment application. The court considered whether the applicable procedural rules allowed the DR to make such an amendment order.
208080592 remedial-cases-2
homework help,online homework help,online tutors,online tutoring,research paper help,do my homework,
https://www.homeworkping.com/
304138-2020-Dayandayan_v._Spouses_Rojas20210531-12-1vu0b68.pdf
1) The petitioners have been residing on the subject property for several decades before the respondents purchased it in 1997. The respondents filed a complaint for unlawful detainer against the petitioners to recover possession, claiming they allowed the petitioners to stay on the property.
2) The MCTC ruled in favor of the respondents, but the RTC reversed, finding lack of evidence that the respondents tolerated the petitioners' presence. The CA reversed the RTC.
3) The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that as lawful occupants for decades prior, the respondents cannot use an unlawful detainer case to wrest possession, and must instead file the proper action (reivindicatoria or publiciana)
Scottish Letting Day 2019 - Biosphere Green
The document provides information about the Scottish Letting Day 2019 conference and exhibition that took place on November 12, 2019. It includes the schedule of sessions on various topics related to property letting in Scotland. Some of the sessions covered obtaining repossession orders from the First-tier Tribunal, compliance with the letting agent code of practice, and using LinkedIn effectively for business development. The document acts as an agenda and guide for attendees of the conference.
citimortgage robo signers
The Court of Appeals affirms the lower court's granting of summary judgment to CitiMortgage in a foreclosure action. Maria Potvin argued she was entitled to relief under the Home Affordable Modification Program and that foreclosure was inequitable, but the court found the mediation was non-binding and she did not sign the modification agreement or make payments. The court also found the affidavit from CitiMortgage in support of summary judgment met evidentiary rules for records of regularly conducted business activities. Therefore, the appeals court denied all of Potvin's assignments of error and upheld the foreclosure.
Similar to land Law PPT.pptx (20)
Call for review of ET judgment at a hearing for wasted costs
Call for review of ET judgment at a hearing for wasted costs
Dewing v. Abarta Oil & Gas Co. - PA Superior Court Ruling
Dewing v. Abarta Oil & Gas Co. - PA Superior Court Ruling
304138-2020-Dayandayan_v._Spouses_Rojas20210531-12-1vu0b68.pdf
304138-2020-Dayandayan_v._Spouses_Rojas20210531-12-1vu0b68.pdf
Recently uploaded
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Recently uploaded (20)
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
land Law PPT.pptx
- 2. INTRODUCTION
- 3. Taranjeet Singh Mohan Singh Sawhney and others vs. District Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies and others. INTRODUCTION
- 4. BACKGROUND
- 5. • This case revolves around a property dispute in Mumbai • piece of land originally owned by Late Shri Mohan Singh BACKGROUND
- 8. • The Appellants • Respondent No. 4 • Respondent No. 3 • District Deputy Registrar Cooperative Societies (Respondent No. 1) PARTIES INVOLVED
- 9. TIMELINE
- 10. TIMELINE
- 11. TIMELINE
- 12. 1979
- 13. • Late Shri Mohan Singh entered into an agreement to sell a portion of his land to respondent No. 4. • Respondent No. 4 constructed buildings on that land 1979
- 14. 2005
- 15. • Due to non-payment of the agreed amount • terminated the 1979 agreement in 2005 2005
- 16. 2011
- 17. • Respondent No. 5 approached the appellants to purchase a portion of the land. • Conveyance deed was executed in 2011. 2011
- 18. LEGAL PROCEDING
- 19. LEGAL PROCEEDING
- 20. - The acceptance of the application by Respondent No. 1. - The appellants raising several objections, including questioning the jurisdiction of Respondent No. 1 and asserting that the 1979 agreement had been terminated. - Ultimately, Respondent No. 1 granting a certificate to respondent No. 3, allowing them to execute the conveyance deed unilaterally. LEGAL PROCEEDING
- 23. The appellants challenged Respondent No. 1's decision in the Bombay High Court, primarily arguing that Respondent No. 1 had arbitrarily changed the hearing date without ensuring proper notice to the parties. However, the High Court declined to grant a stay on the decision, citing the delay in filing the petition and the subsequent registration of the conveyance deed. HIGH COURT CHALLENGE
- 26. The appellants appealed the High Court's decision to the Supreme Court, asserting that the order should be declared null and void due to the improper preponement of the hearing date and the lack of notice. The Supreme Court examined the arguments and found that the preponement of the hearing date was unjustified and that proper notice had not been served on the appellants. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside Respondent No. 1's previous order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. SUPREME COURT DECISION
- 27. IMPLICATION
- 28. IMPLICATION
- 29. It serves as a reminder that procedural fairness is essential to uphold the principles of justice and protect the rights of all parties involved. IMPLICATION
- 30. CONCLUSION
- 31. CONCLUSION
- 32. We've examined the background, key parties, chronology of events, legal proceedings, High Court challenge, and the Supreme Court's decision. It underscores the crucial role of the judicial process in ensuring justice and fairness. CONCLUSION