Community Information
Meeting: The Future of Public
Education in Shelby County
         January 19, 2011

            Daniel Kiel
     The University of Memphis
          School of Law
Shelby County Comparison:
        Government vs. Schools
     Shelby County 
                              Shelby County Schools
      Government
 Serves ENTIRETY of           Serves only the portion of 
  Shelby County (including      Shelby County outside of 
  Memphians and non‐            the Memphis city limits
  Memphians)
Individual 1: The Memphian
                                                Votes for Member of
        PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES
                                                Memphis City School
                                                Board
            City of Memphis Taxpayer
                                                Children Assigned to
                                                Attend Memphis City
City of Memphis                Shelby County    Schools
  Government                    Government
Individual 2: The Non‐Memphian

 PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES

                             Votes for Members of
  Taxpayer Outside Memphis   Shelby County School
                             Board

      Shelby County 
                             Children Assigned to
       Government            Attend Shelby County
                             Schools
Funding Sources
 Source
                                   (103,593 students)   (47,342 students)

 State of Tennessee                     $428M               $174M
                                       (49.5%)             (50.7%)
 Shelby County Property Taxes           $255M               $115M
 (paid by all county residents –
 Memphian and non‐Memphian)            (29.5%)             (33.5%)
 Shelby County Sales Taxes              $89M                $43M
                                       (10.3%)             (12.6%)
 City of Memphis Property Taxes         $84M                  N/A
 (paid only by Memphians)
                                       (9.8%)
 Other                                  $8M                  $10M
                                       (1.0%)               (3.0%)
Why Change the Status Quo?: 
     Interests of the Two Districts



 Continued Local     Sustainability in
  Control              Funding
Strategy: SCS Conversion to 
              Special School District

Currently: SCS is a “County” District

Changes if SCS Converted to Special School District
  oFrozen Boundaries
  oIndependent Taxing Authority
  oVeto Power Over Merger with Other School Systems

To Create a Special School District:
  oLift Statewide Ban
  oLegislative Creation of New Special School District
Why Change the Status Quo?: 
     Interests of the Two Districts



 Continued Local     Sustainability in
  Control              Funding
Strategy: Surrender of 
                       MCS Charter

Motivating Force: Funding Uncertainties
  oCity Contribution
  oCounty Contribution if SCS becomes Special School
  District

Meaning and Effect of Charter Surrender

To Dissolve Memphis City Schools Charter:
  oSchool Board Surrender of Charter
  oCitywide Referendum
Step One: MCS Board Votes to 
    Surrender Charter (Dec. 20, 2010)




Next Step: Citywide Referendum
What If…..the referendum succeeds?

Impact on Funding:
    Single-Source Local Funding – Shelby County Gov’t

Impact on Governance: Merged District
    Short-Term Uncertainty
    Long-Term = Reconstituted County-wide Board

Impact on Students:
    Transition Period to Hammer Out Details (for
     example, uniforms, staffing, textbooks, etc.)
    New Board to Make Long-Term Decisions on student
     assignment, academic programs
What If…..the referendum
           does not succeed?

Maintenance of Status Quo in funding and governance

Shelby County Schools free to continue pursuit of Special
School District status in state legislature

Memphis City Schools free to consider other agreements
to ensure sustainable funding
Current Sub‐Issues

Continued Negotiation Between the Districts
  oMCS Rejection of SCS Proposed Agreement

Legislation that Could Change Current Landscape
  oState Legislature
  oMemphis City Council

Kiel stand presentation slides

  • 1.
    Community Information Meeting: TheFuture of Public Education in Shelby County January 19, 2011 Daniel Kiel The University of Memphis School of Law
  • 2.
    Shelby County Comparison: Government vs. Schools Shelby County  Shelby County Schools Government  Serves ENTIRETY of   Serves only the portion of  Shelby County (including  Shelby County outside of  Memphians and non‐ the Memphis city limits Memphians)
  • 4.
    Individual 1: The Memphian Votes for Member of PATH OF PROPERTY TAXES Memphis City School Board City of Memphis Taxpayer Children Assigned to Attend Memphis City City of Memphis  Shelby County  Schools Government Government
  • 5.
    Individual 2: The Non‐Memphian PATH OFPROPERTY TAXES Votes for Members of Taxpayer Outside Memphis Shelby County School Board Shelby County  Children Assigned to Government Attend Shelby County Schools
  • 6.
    Funding Sources Source (103,593 students) (47,342 students) State of Tennessee $428M $174M (49.5%) (50.7%) Shelby County Property Taxes $255M $115M (paid by all county residents – Memphian and non‐Memphian) (29.5%) (33.5%) Shelby County Sales Taxes $89M $43M (10.3%) (12.6%) City of Memphis Property Taxes  $84M N/A (paid only by Memphians) (9.8%) Other $8M $10M (1.0%) (3.0%)
  • 7.
    Why Change the Status Quo?:  Interests of the Two Districts  Continued Local  Sustainability in Control Funding
  • 8.
    Strategy: SCS Conversion to  Special School District Currently: SCS is a “County” District Changes if SCS Converted to Special School District oFrozen Boundaries oIndependent Taxing Authority oVeto Power Over Merger with Other School Systems To Create a Special School District: oLift Statewide Ban oLegislative Creation of New Special School District
  • 9.
    Why Change the Status Quo?:  Interests of the Two Districts  Continued Local  Sustainability in Control Funding
  • 10.
    Strategy: Surrender of  MCS Charter Motivating Force: Funding Uncertainties oCity Contribution oCounty Contribution if SCS becomes Special School District Meaning and Effect of Charter Surrender To Dissolve Memphis City Schools Charter: oSchool Board Surrender of Charter oCitywide Referendum
  • 11.
    Step One: MCS Board Votes to  Surrender Charter (Dec. 20, 2010) Next Step: Citywide Referendum
  • 12.
    What If…..the referendum succeeds? Impact on Funding:  Single-Source Local Funding – Shelby County Gov’t Impact on Governance: Merged District  Short-Term Uncertainty  Long-Term = Reconstituted County-wide Board Impact on Students:  Transition Period to Hammer Out Details (for example, uniforms, staffing, textbooks, etc.)  New Board to Make Long-Term Decisions on student assignment, academic programs
  • 13.
    What If…..the referendum does not succeed? Maintenance of Status Quo in funding and governance Shelby County Schools free to continue pursuit of Special School District status in state legislature Memphis City Schools free to consider other agreements to ensure sustainable funding
  • 14.
    Current Sub‐Issues Continued Negotiation Betweenthe Districts oMCS Rejection of SCS Proposed Agreement Legislation that Could Change Current Landscape oState Legislature oMemphis City Council