Eric Smith murdered 4-year-old Derrick Robie in Savona, New York in 1993. He was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to 9 years to life in prison. The prosecution argued Smith committed a premeditated crime, while the defense claimed he had intermittent explosive disorder. Psychiatrists said Smith had low self-esteem and an inferiority complex. While some debate his parole, most feel he was rightly convicted for his horrific crime.
ip3 JUVENILES CRIME AND THE COURT SYSTEM GIBSONDfinalDm Gibson
This document discusses juvenile crime and the justice system's treatment of juvenile offenders. It provides an overview of waiver procedures that allow juveniles to be tried as adults and describes three relevant Supreme Court cases on this issue. The document argues against waiving juveniles to adult court, asserting that incarcerating youth with adult criminals can further harm juvenile offenders rather than rehabilitate them. It suggests alternative approaches focused on understanding why juveniles commit crimes, listening to them, providing support and education, and treating them with care, love and rehabilitation rather than punishment.
The document discusses solving a murder case involving multiple suspects. It was most difficult to find links between evidence, but lab work identifying evidence was easiest. Questioning suspects was not effective as they would lie. Media aims to profit and sensationalize stories, providing unreliable information. Fingerprints and lip prints can identify people, but multiple matches are needed. While TV shows like CSI dramatize forensics, real investigations require rigorous evidence collection and analysis. After examining evidence like fingerprints, DNA, witness statements, the main suspects Jack Smith and Peter Hamilton were found guilty of murder and related crimes and sentenced to life in prison, while Robyn Jones and Jane Liu received lesser sentences for their limited involvement.
The document analyzes the philosophical concepts of free will and determinism as depicted in the 2002 film Minority Report. It discusses two key scenes from the movie: in the first, the main character John Anderton considers killing a man despite predictions he will do so, demonstrating his free will; in the second, the character Lamar Burgess chooses not to kill someone even though it was predicted, again showing free will. The document also references philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine, and St. Thomas Aquinas to support the idea that humans have free will and are not simply determined by fate or divine forces.
This document summarizes two high-profile murder trials in the United States - the OJ Simpson trial and the Casey Anthony trial. Both trials resulted in controversial acquittals that highlighted the power of juries to nullify charges despite evidence. The OJ Simpson jury acquitted him of murder charges related to the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman despite DNA evidence. Similarly, the Casey Anthony jury acquitted her of murdering her daughter Caylee, though she was found guilty of lying to police. Both verdicts emphasized the juries' ability to disregard instructions and evidence to reach their own conclusions.
05/23/12 - DERSHOWITZ (Prosecutor Should Drop Charges)VogelDenise
The three sentence summary is:
Leftist law professor Alan Dershowitz says the prosecutor in the George Zimmerman case should drop the second-degree murder charge based on evidence that supports Zimmerman's claim of self-defense, including medical records showing Zimmerman's injuries. Dershowitz argues the prosecutor has acted unethically by withholding exculpatory evidence and that if the evidence is valid, she has no choice but to drop the charges to act ethically and professionally. The evidence appears strong enough that Dershowitz believes Zimmerman will likely be acquitted if the case goes to trial.
In this document, the author discusses Cicero's work "The Defense of Justice" in which two rhetoricians debate justice. One argues in favor of injustice by proposing a scenario where a just man is treated as a criminal while an unjust man is praised. The author disagrees, arguing they would choose justice even if it led to negative consequences. The author also argues that countries like North Korea, led by the unjust Kim Jong Un, are dysfunctional while justice is needed for a democracy to function properly and ensure equal treatment. In conclusion, the author maintains there is no justice in being unjust and that pursuing justice is important despite immediate rewards for unjust behavior.
The document discusses the Supreme Court case Roper v. Simmons, which ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for juveniles under 18. It provides background on the case of Christopher Simmons, who was 17 when he committed murder. The Court found the death penalty violated the 8th amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment due to juveniles' lack of maturity and vulnerability to negative influences. Prior to Roper, around 366 juveniles had been executed in the US since colonial times.
ip3 JUVENILES CRIME AND THE COURT SYSTEM GIBSONDfinalDm Gibson
This document discusses juvenile crime and the justice system's treatment of juvenile offenders. It provides an overview of waiver procedures that allow juveniles to be tried as adults and describes three relevant Supreme Court cases on this issue. The document argues against waiving juveniles to adult court, asserting that incarcerating youth with adult criminals can further harm juvenile offenders rather than rehabilitate them. It suggests alternative approaches focused on understanding why juveniles commit crimes, listening to them, providing support and education, and treating them with care, love and rehabilitation rather than punishment.
The document discusses solving a murder case involving multiple suspects. It was most difficult to find links between evidence, but lab work identifying evidence was easiest. Questioning suspects was not effective as they would lie. Media aims to profit and sensationalize stories, providing unreliable information. Fingerprints and lip prints can identify people, but multiple matches are needed. While TV shows like CSI dramatize forensics, real investigations require rigorous evidence collection and analysis. After examining evidence like fingerprints, DNA, witness statements, the main suspects Jack Smith and Peter Hamilton were found guilty of murder and related crimes and sentenced to life in prison, while Robyn Jones and Jane Liu received lesser sentences for their limited involvement.
The document analyzes the philosophical concepts of free will and determinism as depicted in the 2002 film Minority Report. It discusses two key scenes from the movie: in the first, the main character John Anderton considers killing a man despite predictions he will do so, demonstrating his free will; in the second, the character Lamar Burgess chooses not to kill someone even though it was predicted, again showing free will. The document also references philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine, and St. Thomas Aquinas to support the idea that humans have free will and are not simply determined by fate or divine forces.
This document summarizes two high-profile murder trials in the United States - the OJ Simpson trial and the Casey Anthony trial. Both trials resulted in controversial acquittals that highlighted the power of juries to nullify charges despite evidence. The OJ Simpson jury acquitted him of murder charges related to the deaths of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman despite DNA evidence. Similarly, the Casey Anthony jury acquitted her of murdering her daughter Caylee, though she was found guilty of lying to police. Both verdicts emphasized the juries' ability to disregard instructions and evidence to reach their own conclusions.
05/23/12 - DERSHOWITZ (Prosecutor Should Drop Charges)VogelDenise
The three sentence summary is:
Leftist law professor Alan Dershowitz says the prosecutor in the George Zimmerman case should drop the second-degree murder charge based on evidence that supports Zimmerman's claim of self-defense, including medical records showing Zimmerman's injuries. Dershowitz argues the prosecutor has acted unethically by withholding exculpatory evidence and that if the evidence is valid, she has no choice but to drop the charges to act ethically and professionally. The evidence appears strong enough that Dershowitz believes Zimmerman will likely be acquitted if the case goes to trial.
In this document, the author discusses Cicero's work "The Defense of Justice" in which two rhetoricians debate justice. One argues in favor of injustice by proposing a scenario where a just man is treated as a criminal while an unjust man is praised. The author disagrees, arguing they would choose justice even if it led to negative consequences. The author also argues that countries like North Korea, led by the unjust Kim Jong Un, are dysfunctional while justice is needed for a democracy to function properly and ensure equal treatment. In conclusion, the author maintains there is no justice in being unjust and that pursuing justice is important despite immediate rewards for unjust behavior.
The document discusses the Supreme Court case Roper v. Simmons, which ruled the death penalty unconstitutional for juveniles under 18. It provides background on the case of Christopher Simmons, who was 17 when he committed murder. The Court found the death penalty violated the 8th amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment due to juveniles' lack of maturity and vulnerability to negative influences. Prior to Roper, around 366 juveniles had been executed in the US since colonial times.
Wilbert Rideau wrote "When Prisoners Protest" to bring attention to the misconceptions around solitary confinement in prisons and the lack of rehabilitation for inmates. Based on his 44 years spent in various prisons, including 12 years in solitary confinement, Rideau argues that solitary confinement is psychologically damaging and that prisons do little to prepare inmates for release back into society. He uses his own experience and observations from other prisons to advocate for more humane treatment of inmates and greater focus on rehabilitation through education, job training, and open communication between prison officials and inmates.
This document contains notes from a legal research class, summarizing 4 court cases: Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez involving employment discrimination; Cooper v. Oklahoma concerning competency standards; Murphy v. United Parcel Service regarding disability discrimination; and Tennard v. Dretke regarding mental disability and the death penalty. The notes provide the case names, parties involved, key dates, issues, and dissenting opinions.
David Gale, an activist against capital punishment, is sentenced to death for raping and killing a fellow activist. He claims his innocence in interviews with a journalist, Bitsey Bloom. Gale explains that another activist, Constance Harraway, framed him for the crimes in an attempt to prove that innocent people are executed. On the day of Gale's execution, Bloom discovers evidence that Gale was telling the truth, but arrives at the prison too late to stop the execution.
A set of instructions to students doing a mock trial for an English or Theater class. The goal of the trial is to determine if Friar Laurence is guilty of performing an illegal marriage.
The True Timeline Behind The People vs. O.J. SimpsonInstant Checkmate
What really happened during the O.J Simpson trial? Instant Checkmate presents a timeline of true events — from the moment the bodies of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman were discovered to the controversial verdict.
For more information about the trial, read the original article (plus an excerpt from O.J. Simpson's book, If I Did It) here: https://www.instantcheckmate.com/crimewire/oj-simpson-timeline-infographic/
This document is an opinion paper discussing the concept of integrity. It begins by defining integrity as being honest, consistent, and doing what is right regardless of consequences. It then provides examples of historical figures who demonstrated integrity, such as John McCain refusing an early release from prison and Socrates standing by his beliefs even at death. In contrast, it discusses leaders who lacked integrity, such as Hitler disregarding others' opinions and President Clinton committing adultery. The paper concludes that while integrity can be difficult, living with integrity avoids mental anguish and gains credibility over time.
OJ Simpson was tried for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson, his ex-wife, and Ronald Goldman in 1994. The prosecution presented substantial forensic evidence linking Simpson to the crime scene and the victims, including blood found in his vehicle and at his home, however the jury controversially found him not guilty. It remains one of the highest profile and debated murder trials in history.
Wilbert Rideau wrote "When Prisoners Protest" to bring attention to the misconceptions around solitary confinement in prisons and the lack of rehabilitation for inmates. Based on his 44 years spent in various prisons, including 12 years in solitary confinement, Rideau argues that solitary confinement is psychologically damaging and that prisons do little to prepare inmates for release back into society. He uses his own experience and observations from other prisons to advocate for more humane treatment of inmates and greater focus on rehabilitation through education, job training, and open communication between prison officials and inmates.
This document contains notes from a legal research class, summarizing 4 court cases: Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez involving employment discrimination; Cooper v. Oklahoma concerning competency standards; Murphy v. United Parcel Service regarding disability discrimination; and Tennard v. Dretke regarding mental disability and the death penalty. The notes provide the case names, parties involved, key dates, issues, and dissenting opinions.
David Gale, an activist against capital punishment, is sentenced to death for raping and killing a fellow activist. He claims his innocence in interviews with a journalist, Bitsey Bloom. Gale explains that another activist, Constance Harraway, framed him for the crimes in an attempt to prove that innocent people are executed. On the day of Gale's execution, Bloom discovers evidence that Gale was telling the truth, but arrives at the prison too late to stop the execution.
A set of instructions to students doing a mock trial for an English or Theater class. The goal of the trial is to determine if Friar Laurence is guilty of performing an illegal marriage.
The True Timeline Behind The People vs. O.J. SimpsonInstant Checkmate
What really happened during the O.J Simpson trial? Instant Checkmate presents a timeline of true events — from the moment the bodies of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman were discovered to the controversial verdict.
For more information about the trial, read the original article (plus an excerpt from O.J. Simpson's book, If I Did It) here: https://www.instantcheckmate.com/crimewire/oj-simpson-timeline-infographic/
This document is an opinion paper discussing the concept of integrity. It begins by defining integrity as being honest, consistent, and doing what is right regardless of consequences. It then provides examples of historical figures who demonstrated integrity, such as John McCain refusing an early release from prison and Socrates standing by his beliefs even at death. In contrast, it discusses leaders who lacked integrity, such as Hitler disregarding others' opinions and President Clinton committing adultery. The paper concludes that while integrity can be difficult, living with integrity avoids mental anguish and gains credibility over time.
OJ Simpson was tried for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson, his ex-wife, and Ronald Goldman in 1994. The prosecution presented substantial forensic evidence linking Simpson to the crime scene and the victims, including blood found in his vehicle and at his home, however the jury controversially found him not guilty. It remains one of the highest profile and debated murder trials in history.
1. The Horror of a Small
Upstate New York Town
2015
JUVENILEJUSTICERESEARCH PAPER
JD MAC
2. The Horror of a Small Upstate NewYorkTown
Introduction
August 2, 1993 a young boy’s life was taken from him. Derrick Robie was 4 years and 10
months old when he was found lifeless on the edge of a park, in the small Upstate New York
town of Savona. Eric Smith is the one who would be charged and convicted of this heinous act
after confessing to State Police Criminal Investigators. Eric Smith was a thirteen year old boy
who was described as an “updated version of Tom Sawyer” (The New York Times, 1993). The
actions of Smith sent shock waves through this town of 970 people and further helped change the
states Juvenile Laws.
Overview of the Court’s Decision
On August 16, 1994 Eric Smith found out his fate for his actions the year prior. The case
being placed in the hands of the jury, six men and six, women, was deliberated for only seven
hours. Just before 10pm on August 16, 1994 a verdict of guilty was read for the teen-ager who
was tried as an adult. Eric Smith now faced nine years to life imprisonment. "The verdict is not
going to bring Derrick back," Dale Robie said minutes after leaving the courtroom. But he said
he was gratified "that the system is starting to be responsive to these kids' action," (The New
York Times, 1994).
The Prosecution’s Side
During the trial the Steuben County District Attorney, John C. Tunney argued that the
teen’s confession of the murder “was a cold-blooded act that demanded a long prison term.” The
prosecution would remind the twelve jurors multiple times to not be fooled be the defendant’s
age and freckled, Tom Sawyer-like boyishness. The DA would label Smith as a sadist who
“coaxed” the younger boy to his death to fulfill his own personal need to inflict cruelty to
3. The Horror of a Small Upstate NewYorkTown
another being. The prosecution would read the confession in detail, depicting to the jury the
horror that Derrick Robie endured in the final moments of his young, innocent life.
The Defense’s Side
On the other side of the spectrum Eric Smith’s defense lawyer, Kevin Bradley would try
to convince the jury that Smith suffered from a mental disease known as intermittent explosive
disorder. Intermittent Explosive Disorder is defined as “the occurrence of discrete episodes of
failure to resist aggressive impulses that result in serious assaultive acts or destruction of
property” (PsychCentral.com, 2015). Bradley’s main focus to the jury was the testimony from
Dr. Stephen Herman, a child psychiatrist. The defense also never retracted the confession given
by Smith, but approached that the defendant “needed psychiatric help, not punishment.” (The
New York Times, 1994).
In My Opinion
This case is a case of a teen-ager who deserved life in prison. Eric Smith is a cold
blooded murder, who regardless of his own age, took the life of an innocent child who was too
young to defend himself. I feel that our justice system got it right on this case, though the
defendant was only thirteen at the time of the murder and though he may have not been fully
mentally developed, he was at an age that he should have known the difference of right and
wrong. I believe Smith is a danger to society even still today. I look at it as if what if it was a
thirty-five year old man who committed the crime of strangling, murdering, and sodomizing a
four year old? What if the details of the murder of Derrick Robie was done by an adult? These
questions make me feel that the jury came to the right verdict. I feel that if these actions were
done by an adult, we as society would want to lock them up and throw away the key, a life
4. The Horror of a Small Upstate NewYorkTown
sentence. Smith being tried as an adult but sentenced to the maximum of a juvenile, the justice
system also got it right in giving him the opportunity of parole due to his age. Smith being so
young does deserve the opportunity to show he has become a better person, but it does not
change that I do feel that parole should not be granted and since the opportunities of parole have
come about in 2002, he has been denied each time, the most recent being in 2014.
Psychodynamic Theory
In this case I believe that Eric Smith suffers from Inferiority Complex which is a complex
that people who have feelings of inadequacy and compensate for them with a drive for
superiority, such as controlling others. According to the child psychiatrist Dr. Stephen Herman
that was used for the defense’s testimony, Smith fits this complex. “Dr. Herman testified that
Eric, whom he said has an I.Q. in the low-average range, suffered from low self-esteem that
became more pronounced as he grew older. He said the boy's mother had taken an anti-
convulsant medication, trimethedione, while pregnant with him that may have caused physical
and developmental problems.” (The New York Times, 1994). The testimony from Dr. Herman
fits directly in the definition of the inferiority complex and is why I feel that Eric Smith fits this
Psychodynamic Theory. To further emphasize this, DA Tunney stated during the trial in his
closing statements “Turning to the jurors one last time, he said of the defendant: "He intended to
take control and be the victimizer instead of the victim" (The New York Times, 1994
Conclusion
On August 2, 1993 a family’s life was thrown into shambles, the murder of their four
year old son by a monster would forever affect the Robie family. Eric Smith was a thirteen year
who suffered from what seemed to be an inferiority complex and was looking for the perfect
5. The Horror of a Small Upstate NewYorkTown
target to control and reign superior over. Smith’s disgusting actions led to the death of Derrick
Robie and to his what is seemingly turning into a life behind bars. Still to this day it is an
ongoing debate on whether or not to parole Smith but as DA Tunney previously stated "Let's
assume he's not a threat anymore. OK. Should we release him? There's a lot more to talk about.
That is, has he been punished enough?" (CBSNews, 2004). In all honest I feel that no parole and
life imprisonment is the only punishment that is enough for the heinous crime Eric Smith has
committed.
6. The Horror of a Small Upstate NewYorkTown
Citations
Intermittent Explosive Disorder Symptoms. (n.d.). Retrieved March 16, 2015, from
http://psychcentral.com/disorders/intermittent-explosive-disorder-symptoms/
Leung, R. (2004, December 10). Why Did Eric Kill? Retrieved March 16, 2015, from
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/why-did-eric-kill-10-12-2004/
Myers, D. (2007, December 4). Eric Smith: His Case Helped To Change Juvenile Laws.
Retrieved March 16, 2015, from http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/246963
Nordheimer, J. (1994, August 16). 14-Year-Old Convicted in Murder of Preschooler in Upstate
Town. Retrieved March 16, 2015, from
http://www.nytimes.com/1994/08/17/nyregion/14-year-old-convicted-in-murder-of-
preschooler-in-upstate-town.html