Jus303

•Download as PPT, PDF•

1 like•309 views

The document discusses different theories of justice, including utilitarian justice which benefits all parties and retributive justice which adequately punishes the guilty. It examines a case where a father murdered his family before committing suicide, preventing justice from being served, and questions which form of justice would have been appropriate if it could be applied.

JUSTICE 303: FINAL PROJECT When is Justice Served?

What Makes theory great?! ,[object Object],[object Object]

What is Justice? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What is Justice pt.2 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Retributive Justice ,[object Object],[object Object]

When is Justice Served? ,[object Object],[object Object]

Illinois Family deaths ruled murder-suicide ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

If justice could be served ,[object Object]

Citations: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

A Debate of the Death Penalty Essay Arguments Against The Death Penalty Argument Against The Death Penalty Arguments Against The Death Penalty Arguments Against Death Row Argument Against The Death Penalty Essay Arguments Against The Death Penalty Arguments Against The Death Penalty Arguments Against The Death Penalty Argument Against the Death Penalty Essay Arguments Against Death Penalty Arguments Against The Death Penalty Essay Arguments Against The Death Penalty Arguments Against The Death Penalty Arguments Against The Death Penalty Arguments Against The Death Penalty Against The Death Penalty Essay Arguments Against Death Penalty Death Penalty Arguments Arguments Against The Death Penalty

Justice Essays

Paper Writing Service Reviews

Death PenaltyA policy claim is a piece of argument that holds t.docx

theodorelove43763

Death Penalty A policy claim is a piece of argument that holds that a certain condition or position should be upheld or let to exist. A policy claim therefore expresses the writer’s argument that the position is necessary and hence portrays a sense of obligation. A policy claim can therefore be easily recognized because of the modal verbs used in it like ‘must’, ‘ought to’, ‘need’ or even ‘have to’ among others. The modal verbs play a crucial role in communicating the sense of obligation. The claim of policy therefore goes ahead to advocate for the adoption of a specific policy because there is a problem at hand that calls for a solution. The society we live in has always relied on punishment as a way of discouraging persons who would undertake criminal activities from engaging in such unlawful actions. The same society we live in, somehow believes that murder tops the least of criminal acts and as such must be discouraged by attaching the strongest punishment for would be violators, the death penalty. Even the bible prescribes a death penalty for murder. The rationale being that when a murderer is executed through a death sentence, the would-be murderers would not even toy with the idea of killing someone because they would be afraid to lose their own lives in the process. For several years, criminologists have studied the rates of murder to establish if indeed there is how they are reduced by the very likelihood that convicted murderers would always be executed but the results from such studies continue to be inconclusive. Those who are of the school of thought that the death penalty indeed prevented new murder cases hold that the inconclusiveness of these studies is probably simply because the death penalty is an intervention that is rarely used. They hold that even when used, it is always because of a long process that takes several years before it is finally done. This piece is going to argue against death penalty as a deterrence tool against murder. In Europe, the campaign against the death penalty started back in the 1750s by academicians like Voltaire and Jeremy Bentham. These brains held that the death penalty was unnecessarily overrated as a crime deterrence tool and that it was unnecessarily cruel. They instead advocated for life imprisonment as an alternative means of punishing such offenders. This was the beginning of a worldwide move to see the death penalty abolished. The state of Michigan in the US was the first one in the United States of America to abolish death penalty in 1847 (Bedau, pg 34). Several other countries across the world more so in Western Europe and Latin America have since abolished it. The British however abolished it in 1965. All these were because there was a problem since even persons who were only supposed to be guilty of manslaughter, ended up being convicted for a death penalty (Heilbrun, pg 57). Besides this, there are several social, ethical and moral issues that death penalty seriously violates .

Death Penalty Debate Essay

Custom Paper Services

Death Penalty Against Essay

Cheap Paper Writing Services

Capital Punishment Essays

Paper Writing Service Superiorpapers