Judgment Reasons 1400500 2011
•
0 likes•319 views
Bristol Employment Tribunal Judgment
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Sir robert francis qc
This 3 sentence document criticizes managers who protect themselves through biased investigations, character attacks, long suspensions, unfair disciplinary hearings, and firing good employees who report issues. It references a 2015 report by Sir Robert Francis QC on problems with whistleblowing in the UK National Health Service.
Letter from president
Dear Sir
Thank you for your letter of today.
I sent that message to you in error and I apologise.
As you have said previously you cannot intervene, I believed that correspondence between us was at an end.
To call me vexatious and ask for my private letters for seeking the truth to be deleted, after I have committed a protected act, as far as I am concerned are detrimental, bullying and therefore victimisation.
I refer you to the attached document judicial conduct 2013
As I have stated an employment Judge said I should never have lost my case.
My difficulties lie in the document ANNEX 1 the Bristol ET got it wrong and the wrong needs to be corrected.
Yours Sincerely
Douglas
REJ Parkin
Dear Judge Parkin
I thank you for your letter of today and for taking the time to review my document annex 1.
You are not entirely correct when you say “I recognise that you feel dissatisfied with the original judgment”
The truth is I am mostly dissatisfied by the reasons as per my document annex 1.
I am an ordinary individual who believes in truth and honesty, not a Lawyer or Judge with prerogatives which can be easily abused.
Judge Hand admits the Tribunal accepted the respondents version of events and you agree.
He fails to mention they made up facts to suit.
However what Judge Hand says is irrelevant to my requests, the Bristol ET got important facts wrong.
The principle of finality in this case relies on corruption of the truth, bullying; this cannot be allowed.
I would like the truth recorded in the reasons for posterity not a fabrication of false facts.
I seek satisfaction, for these reasons I will continue to write to whoever I wish, including you.
Please note my new address for posting letters is as my e-mail of 03/02/2015.
Thank you again.
Douglas.
Judgment
Space the final frontier to boldly go where no man has gone before.
Captain Kirk forgot about "Access to Justice" in the British courts.
The Bangalore principles of Judicial Conduct
This document presents The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct from 2002. It begins with a preamble describing the importance of an independent, impartial and competent judiciary. It then outlines 6 main values that judicial conduct should uphold: Independence, Impartiality, Integrity, Propriety, Equality, and Competence and Diligence. For each value, it provides principles and applications/guidelines for judges to adhere to in order to maintain the highest ethical standards. The document aims to provide a framework to guide appropriate judicial behavior and decision making.
Recommended
Sir robert francis qc
This 3 sentence document criticizes managers who protect themselves through biased investigations, character attacks, long suspensions, unfair disciplinary hearings, and firing good employees who report issues. It references a 2015 report by Sir Robert Francis QC on problems with whistleblowing in the UK National Health Service.
Letter from president
Dear Sir
Thank you for your letter of today.
I sent that message to you in error and I apologise.
As you have said previously you cannot intervene, I believed that correspondence between us was at an end.
To call me vexatious and ask for my private letters for seeking the truth to be deleted, after I have committed a protected act, as far as I am concerned are detrimental, bullying and therefore victimisation.
I refer you to the attached document judicial conduct 2013
As I have stated an employment Judge said I should never have lost my case.
My difficulties lie in the document ANNEX 1 the Bristol ET got it wrong and the wrong needs to be corrected.
Yours Sincerely
Douglas
REJ Parkin
Dear Judge Parkin
I thank you for your letter of today and for taking the time to review my document annex 1.
You are not entirely correct when you say “I recognise that you feel dissatisfied with the original judgment”
The truth is I am mostly dissatisfied by the reasons as per my document annex 1.
I am an ordinary individual who believes in truth and honesty, not a Lawyer or Judge with prerogatives which can be easily abused.
Judge Hand admits the Tribunal accepted the respondents version of events and you agree.
He fails to mention they made up facts to suit.
However what Judge Hand says is irrelevant to my requests, the Bristol ET got important facts wrong.
The principle of finality in this case relies on corruption of the truth, bullying; this cannot be allowed.
I would like the truth recorded in the reasons for posterity not a fabrication of false facts.
I seek satisfaction, for these reasons I will continue to write to whoever I wish, including you.
Please note my new address for posting letters is as my e-mail of 03/02/2015.
Thank you again.
Douglas.
Judgment
Space the final frontier to boldly go where no man has gone before.
Captain Kirk forgot about "Access to Justice" in the British courts.
The Bangalore principles of Judicial Conduct
This document presents The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct from 2002. It begins with a preamble describing the importance of an independent, impartial and competent judiciary. It then outlines 6 main values that judicial conduct should uphold: Independence, Impartiality, Integrity, Propriety, Equality, and Competence and Diligence. For each value, it provides principles and applications/guidelines for judges to adhere to in order to maintain the highest ethical standards. The document aims to provide a framework to guide appropriate judicial behavior and decision making.
JCIO Reply
This document is a response from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office to the complainant regarding their complaint about District Judge Asplin. The response dismisses most aspects of the complaint, citing rules that judicial decisions and case management are not matters that can be investigated. It provides explanations for dismissing each point raised in the complaint. The letter also informs the complainant that they can appeal the judicial decision through the proper legal channels or file a complaint with the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman regarding the handling of their complaint.
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
This letter from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office acknowledges a complaint filed by Mr. Gardiner about the conduct of District Judge Asplin during a hearing on October 21, 2014. The letter dismisses part of the complaint, relating to the judge's decision, as the office cannot investigate judicial decisions. For the remaining part of the complaint alleging the judge insulted the complainant's intelligence, more information is requested by January 21st to further investigate, or else that part of the complaint may also be dismissed.
Judicial complaint dismissal
This letter from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office dismisses a complaint made about a district judge. It summarizes the additional information provided about the complaint and explains that most of the complaint relates to judicial decisions and case management, which cannot be investigated. It dismisses these parts of the complaint. The letter also explains that two other parts of the complaint do not meet the threshold for misconduct. It provides information on appealing decisions and contacting the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman with any complaints about how the complaint was handled.
20039 2014 part 2-signed
This document is a response from Mr. Clarke to a complaint filed against District Judge Asplin. It provides 14 examples from the hearing that Mr. Clarke believes insulted his intelligence and showed Judge Asplin was prejudiced and disrespectful. The examples include Judge Asplin prejudging the case early on, making private remarks with the opposing counsel, incorrectly stating facts about the case, and refusing requests for clarification or written reasons for his decision. Mr. Clarke believes Judge Asplin violated principles of judicial conduct around independence, impartiality, integrity, propriety, equality, competence and diligence. He provides the details to assist with the investigation into his complaint about Judge Asplin's conduct during the hearing.
20039 2014 part 1
The document is a letter responding to a complaint made against District Judge Asplin. It summarizes the original complaint which included three points: 1) The reasons given for striking out the case differed from those given at the hearing. 2) The judge was bullying by rolling his eyes and insulting intelligence. 3) A request for a hearing agenda was refused. The response dismisses points 1 and 2, stating the complaints cannot be investigated or require disciplinary action. For point 3, it states the complainant should contact the court manager. The complainant disagrees with the dismissal and provides further explanation for why each point indicates a violation of judicial conduct standards.
Beyond belief
SYSTEMATIC LEAGAL BULLYING!
The Tribunal may well have reached the right outcome.
But, there is no doubt, that their decision was based upon the wrong story and incorrect factual conclusions.
Is this not bias?....it is certainly not fair.
In contravention of the bangalore principles
Annex 1
The document summarizes a judgment from an employment tribunal case between Mr. Douglas Gardiner as claimant and Exsto UK Ltd and others as respondents. It discusses the allegations made in the case regarding constructive unfair dismissal, race discrimination, disability discrimination, and unpaid wages. It finds that while some of the claimant's longstanding complaints predated the key issues, the respondent company's actions from December 2010 did amount to a fundamental breach of contract justifying the claimant's resignation. However, it also notes that the company later made some deductions from the claimant's salary in an attempt to undermine his claims, which were not part of the original issues and aggravated the situation.
Case A51YJ932 n181 direction questionaire
The document discusses the importance of parties attempting to settle civil cases before a hearing. It notes that parties should make every effort to settle through discussion, negotiation or mediation. Formal mediation is mentioned as an option. Settling early can save costs, including court hearing fees. The court will want to know what steps were taken to settle.
Cru1
This document is a notification form for a claim for compensation. It provides details of an injured person, Douglas Gardiner, who is claiming compensation for impaired mental equilibrium and anxiety/depression resulting from an accident on 09/12/2010. The compensator is Exsto UK & Ors, represented by Patrick McBrien of DWF LLP. The form requests additional information such as NHS treatment details and employment history to assist with recovering benefits paid.
Exsto UK Company handbook (june 2007)
This document is the company handbook for Dunlaw Engineering Limited dated June 21, 2007. It outlines the company's policies and procedures on topics such as paternity leave, time off for dependents, compassionate leave, training, dress code, harassment, and conduct. It introduces the senior managers and safety officer employees should report to. The handbook also details policies for performance appraisal, equal opportunities, and health and safety.
Final defence
Dear Mr Gardiner
Please find attached a copy of our defence which was filed with the court on 15th April 2014.
In the interest of future costs and in view of the nature of the defence which has been filed by me, I request that the claim against Peninsula Business Services Ltd be withdrawn by you as no cause of action lies against it. In the event of your failure to do so I shall proceed as robustly as necessary to secure a strike out of the claim.
Your sincerely
Philip Hulme
Philip Hulme
Legal Services
Compliance Manager
N1 court copy
1. The document appears to be a claim form submitted to a court seeking compensation for personal injury and losses arising from an industrial accident.
2. The claimant, Douglas Iain Gardiner, is seeking a total of £626,670 from three defendants - two companies and an administrative firm - for injuries, lost earnings, and damages.
3. The claim form provides details of the accident, the claimant's injuries, lost earnings calculations, and names the preferred court for hearings.
Personal injury claim defense
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Particulars of claim
An industrial accident occurred at Exsto UK premises, injuring the claimant Douglas Gardiner. As a result, Gardiner has been unable to work and suffers ongoing disabilities. The Department for Work and Pensions determined the accident was industrial in nature and awarded Gardiner 20% disability benefits. However, Exsto UK and its insurers Amlin have denied liability and resisted compensation efforts. Gardiner is seeking damages for lost earnings, injuries, and declining quality of life in the wake of the accident at Exsto UK.
原版定做(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
More Related Content
More from Douglas GARDINER
JCIO Reply
This document is a response from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office to the complainant regarding their complaint about District Judge Asplin. The response dismisses most aspects of the complaint, citing rules that judicial decisions and case management are not matters that can be investigated. It provides explanations for dismissing each point raised in the complaint. The letter also informs the complainant that they can appeal the judicial decision through the proper legal channels or file a complaint with the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman regarding the handling of their complaint.
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
This letter from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office acknowledges a complaint filed by Mr. Gardiner about the conduct of District Judge Asplin during a hearing on October 21, 2014. The letter dismisses part of the complaint, relating to the judge's decision, as the office cannot investigate judicial decisions. For the remaining part of the complaint alleging the judge insulted the complainant's intelligence, more information is requested by January 21st to further investigate, or else that part of the complaint may also be dismissed.
Judicial complaint dismissal
This letter from the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office dismisses a complaint made about a district judge. It summarizes the additional information provided about the complaint and explains that most of the complaint relates to judicial decisions and case management, which cannot be investigated. It dismisses these parts of the complaint. The letter also explains that two other parts of the complaint do not meet the threshold for misconduct. It provides information on appealing decisions and contacting the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman with any complaints about how the complaint was handled.
20039 2014 part 2-signed
This document is a response from Mr. Clarke to a complaint filed against District Judge Asplin. It provides 14 examples from the hearing that Mr. Clarke believes insulted his intelligence and showed Judge Asplin was prejudiced and disrespectful. The examples include Judge Asplin prejudging the case early on, making private remarks with the opposing counsel, incorrectly stating facts about the case, and refusing requests for clarification or written reasons for his decision. Mr. Clarke believes Judge Asplin violated principles of judicial conduct around independence, impartiality, integrity, propriety, equality, competence and diligence. He provides the details to assist with the investigation into his complaint about Judge Asplin's conduct during the hearing.
20039 2014 part 1
The document is a letter responding to a complaint made against District Judge Asplin. It summarizes the original complaint which included three points: 1) The reasons given for striking out the case differed from those given at the hearing. 2) The judge was bullying by rolling his eyes and insulting intelligence. 3) A request for a hearing agenda was refused. The response dismisses points 1 and 2, stating the complaints cannot be investigated or require disciplinary action. For point 3, it states the complainant should contact the court manager. The complainant disagrees with the dismissal and provides further explanation for why each point indicates a violation of judicial conduct standards.
Beyond belief
SYSTEMATIC LEAGAL BULLYING!
The Tribunal may well have reached the right outcome.
But, there is no doubt, that their decision was based upon the wrong story and incorrect factual conclusions.
Is this not bias?....it is certainly not fair.
In contravention of the bangalore principles
Annex 1
The document summarizes a judgment from an employment tribunal case between Mr. Douglas Gardiner as claimant and Exsto UK Ltd and others as respondents. It discusses the allegations made in the case regarding constructive unfair dismissal, race discrimination, disability discrimination, and unpaid wages. It finds that while some of the claimant's longstanding complaints predated the key issues, the respondent company's actions from December 2010 did amount to a fundamental breach of contract justifying the claimant's resignation. However, it also notes that the company later made some deductions from the claimant's salary in an attempt to undermine his claims, which were not part of the original issues and aggravated the situation.
Case A51YJ932 n181 direction questionaire
The document discusses the importance of parties attempting to settle civil cases before a hearing. It notes that parties should make every effort to settle through discussion, negotiation or mediation. Formal mediation is mentioned as an option. Settling early can save costs, including court hearing fees. The court will want to know what steps were taken to settle.
Cru1
This document is a notification form for a claim for compensation. It provides details of an injured person, Douglas Gardiner, who is claiming compensation for impaired mental equilibrium and anxiety/depression resulting from an accident on 09/12/2010. The compensator is Exsto UK & Ors, represented by Patrick McBrien of DWF LLP. The form requests additional information such as NHS treatment details and employment history to assist with recovering benefits paid.
Exsto UK Company handbook (june 2007)
This document is the company handbook for Dunlaw Engineering Limited dated June 21, 2007. It outlines the company's policies and procedures on topics such as paternity leave, time off for dependents, compassionate leave, training, dress code, harassment, and conduct. It introduces the senior managers and safety officer employees should report to. The handbook also details policies for performance appraisal, equal opportunities, and health and safety.
Final defence
Dear Mr Gardiner
Please find attached a copy of our defence which was filed with the court on 15th April 2014.
In the interest of future costs and in view of the nature of the defence which has been filed by me, I request that the claim against Peninsula Business Services Ltd be withdrawn by you as no cause of action lies against it. In the event of your failure to do so I shall proceed as robustly as necessary to secure a strike out of the claim.
Your sincerely
Philip Hulme
Philip Hulme
Legal Services
Compliance Manager
N1 court copy
1. The document appears to be a claim form submitted to a court seeking compensation for personal injury and losses arising from an industrial accident.
2. The claimant, Douglas Iain Gardiner, is seeking a total of £626,670 from three defendants - two companies and an administrative firm - for injuries, lost earnings, and damages.
3. The claim form provides details of the accident, the claimant's injuries, lost earnings calculations, and names the preferred court for hearings.
Personal injury claim defense
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Particulars of claim
An industrial accident occurred at Exsto UK premises, injuring the claimant Douglas Gardiner. As a result, Gardiner has been unable to work and suffers ongoing disabilities. The Department for Work and Pensions determined the accident was industrial in nature and awarded Gardiner 20% disability benefits. However, Exsto UK and its insurers Amlin have denied liability and resisted compensation efforts. Gardiner is seeking damages for lost earnings, injuries, and declining quality of life in the wake of the accident at Exsto UK.
More from Douglas GARDINER (20)
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
Judicial complaint dismissal and further info agreed
Recently uploaded
原版定做(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书原版一模一样
原版定制【微信:bwp0011】《(sheffield学位证书)英国谢菲尔德大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信:bwp0011】成绩单 、雅思、外壳、留信学历认证永久存档查询，采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信bwp0011】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信bwp0011】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）】
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Framework
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
在线办理(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UNE毕业证书)新英格兰大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
2024 Idaho Water Users Association, Sun Valley, Idaho - June 11, 2024. Presented by Payton Hampton and Garrett Kitamura
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Recently uploaded (20)
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations Demystified
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaints
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...