17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is the TRANSCRIPT from the September 18, 2015 Bankruptcy Court Hearing in the United States Federal Bankruptcy Court - Southern District Mississippi (Jackson). The Photographs/Pictures have been added for EMPHASIS and BETTER UNDERSTANDING!
ASSIGNMENT #14 The case now proceeds to trial. On th.docxShiraPrater50
ASSIGNMENT #14
The case now proceeds to trial. On their direct case, the People only present two
witnesses: Julio Cruz and Detective Crowley. By stipulation, the People also introduce
Cruz’s medical records into evidence. The People then rest their case.
Randolph does not testify on his own behalf. Nor does the defense call either his
wife or daughter to establish his alibi defense. Instead, the defense solely raises a
mistaken identification defense. In support of that defense, counsel calls an expert
witness on eyewitness identification. Dr. Fulero testifies about the problems concerning
cross-racial identifications of strangers. The defense also calls four eyewitnesses to the
crime as defense witnesses. Ivan Liriano, Angel Pagan, Julio Leonor and Victoriano
Polanco each testify that Randolph is not the man who shot Cruz. They also testify that
Randolph does not match the physical characteristics of the man who shot Cruz. Finally,
the defense calls a DNA expert and a dactylography expert who provide expert
exculpatory evidence on Randolph’s behalf. The defense then rests.
The People choose not to present a rebuttal case.
After closing arguments, the court charges the jury. The court submits five counts
for the jury to consider:
1. Attempted murder in the second degree (Intent to kill)
2. Assault in the first degree (Serious physical injury)
3. Assault in the second degree (Physical injury)
4. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Possession with the
intent to use unlawfully)
5. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Loaded firearm)
The judge charges counts 1, 2 and 3 in the alternative. This means that the jury
can only convict the defendant of one of these counts. The judge likewise charges counts
4 and 5 in the alternative. In practical terms, the jury must consider the highest count
first. They may not consider the lesser counts unless they first acquit the defendant of the
higher count.
You are now in the role of the jury. You have the entire case before you. How do
you resolve the charges against Randolph? Explain why you reached that verdict.
Be as detailed as you can with your explanation. Make sure that your answer is in your own words. If you plagiarize, you will receive a zero for the assignment. Additionally, you should have no quotes in you answer. You are not required to, but may want to use other sources to help you understand the content from the sources I provided. Make sure to give a list of citations for any additional sources you use. Once you have compiled and proofread your answer in a Word document, submit it via the Turnitin link.
Terms to know:
*Before you begin, use the internet to define the following terms:
Immunopathology, lymphopenia, and cytokine storm
General sources (background on human coronaviruses and more specifically on SARs CoV2):
*The coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is named SARs CoV ...
ASSIGNMENT #14 The case now proceeds to trial. On th.docxgertrudebellgrove
ASSIGNMENT #14
The case now proceeds to trial. On their direct case, the People only present two
witnesses: Julio Cruz and Detective Crowley. By stipulation, the People also introduce
Cruz’s medical records into evidence. The People then rest their case.
Randolph does not testify on his own behalf. Nor does the defense call either his
wife or daughter to establish his alibi defense. Instead, the defense solely raises a
mistaken identification defense. In support of that defense, counsel calls an expert
witness on eyewitness identification. Dr. Fulero testifies about the problems concerning
cross-racial identifications of strangers. The defense also calls four eyewitnesses to the
crime as defense witnesses. Ivan Liriano, Angel Pagan, Julio Leonor and Victoriano
Polanco each testify that Randolph is not the man who shot Cruz. They also testify that
Randolph does not match the physical characteristics of the man who shot Cruz. Finally,
the defense calls a DNA expert and a dactylography expert who provide expert
exculpatory evidence on Randolph’s behalf. The defense then rests.
The People choose not to present a rebuttal case.
After closing arguments, the court charges the jury. The court submits five counts
for the jury to consider:
1. Attempted murder in the second degree (Intent to kill)
2. Assault in the first degree (Serious physical injury)
3. Assault in the second degree (Physical injury)
4. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Possession with the
intent to use unlawfully)
5. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Loaded firearm)
The judge charges counts 1, 2 and 3 in the alternative. This means that the jury
can only convict the defendant of one of these counts. The judge likewise charges counts
4 and 5 in the alternative. In practical terms, the jury must consider the highest count
first. They may not consider the lesser counts unless they first acquit the defendant of the
higher count.
You are now in the role of the jury. You have the entire case before you. How do
you resolve the charges against Randolph? Explain why you reached that verdict.
Be as detailed as you can with your explanation. Make sure that your answer is in your own words. If you plagiarize, you will receive a zero for the assignment. Additionally, you should have no quotes in you answer. You are not required to, but may want to use other sources to help you understand the content from the sources I provided. Make sure to give a list of citations for any additional sources you use. Once you have compiled and proofread your answer in a Word document, submit it via the Turnitin link.
Terms to know:
*Before you begin, use the internet to define the following terms:
Immunopathology, lymphopenia, and cytokine storm
General sources (background on human coronaviruses and more specifically on SARs CoV2):
*The coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is named SARs CoV.
A set of instructions to students doing a mock trial for an English or Theater class. The goal of the trial is to determine if Friar Laurence is guilty of performing an illegal marriage.
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is the TRANSCRIPT from the September 18, 2015 Bankruptcy Court Hearing in the United States Federal Bankruptcy Court - Southern District Mississippi (Jackson). The Photographs/Pictures have been added for EMPHASIS and BETTER UNDERSTANDING!
ASSIGNMENT #14 The case now proceeds to trial. On th.docxShiraPrater50
ASSIGNMENT #14
The case now proceeds to trial. On their direct case, the People only present two
witnesses: Julio Cruz and Detective Crowley. By stipulation, the People also introduce
Cruz’s medical records into evidence. The People then rest their case.
Randolph does not testify on his own behalf. Nor does the defense call either his
wife or daughter to establish his alibi defense. Instead, the defense solely raises a
mistaken identification defense. In support of that defense, counsel calls an expert
witness on eyewitness identification. Dr. Fulero testifies about the problems concerning
cross-racial identifications of strangers. The defense also calls four eyewitnesses to the
crime as defense witnesses. Ivan Liriano, Angel Pagan, Julio Leonor and Victoriano
Polanco each testify that Randolph is not the man who shot Cruz. They also testify that
Randolph does not match the physical characteristics of the man who shot Cruz. Finally,
the defense calls a DNA expert and a dactylography expert who provide expert
exculpatory evidence on Randolph’s behalf. The defense then rests.
The People choose not to present a rebuttal case.
After closing arguments, the court charges the jury. The court submits five counts
for the jury to consider:
1. Attempted murder in the second degree (Intent to kill)
2. Assault in the first degree (Serious physical injury)
3. Assault in the second degree (Physical injury)
4. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Possession with the
intent to use unlawfully)
5. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Loaded firearm)
The judge charges counts 1, 2 and 3 in the alternative. This means that the jury
can only convict the defendant of one of these counts. The judge likewise charges counts
4 and 5 in the alternative. In practical terms, the jury must consider the highest count
first. They may not consider the lesser counts unless they first acquit the defendant of the
higher count.
You are now in the role of the jury. You have the entire case before you. How do
you resolve the charges against Randolph? Explain why you reached that verdict.
Be as detailed as you can with your explanation. Make sure that your answer is in your own words. If you plagiarize, you will receive a zero for the assignment. Additionally, you should have no quotes in you answer. You are not required to, but may want to use other sources to help you understand the content from the sources I provided. Make sure to give a list of citations for any additional sources you use. Once you have compiled and proofread your answer in a Word document, submit it via the Turnitin link.
Terms to know:
*Before you begin, use the internet to define the following terms:
Immunopathology, lymphopenia, and cytokine storm
General sources (background on human coronaviruses and more specifically on SARs CoV2):
*The coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is named SARs CoV ...
ASSIGNMENT #14 The case now proceeds to trial. On th.docxgertrudebellgrove
ASSIGNMENT #14
The case now proceeds to trial. On their direct case, the People only present two
witnesses: Julio Cruz and Detective Crowley. By stipulation, the People also introduce
Cruz’s medical records into evidence. The People then rest their case.
Randolph does not testify on his own behalf. Nor does the defense call either his
wife or daughter to establish his alibi defense. Instead, the defense solely raises a
mistaken identification defense. In support of that defense, counsel calls an expert
witness on eyewitness identification. Dr. Fulero testifies about the problems concerning
cross-racial identifications of strangers. The defense also calls four eyewitnesses to the
crime as defense witnesses. Ivan Liriano, Angel Pagan, Julio Leonor and Victoriano
Polanco each testify that Randolph is not the man who shot Cruz. They also testify that
Randolph does not match the physical characteristics of the man who shot Cruz. Finally,
the defense calls a DNA expert and a dactylography expert who provide expert
exculpatory evidence on Randolph’s behalf. The defense then rests.
The People choose not to present a rebuttal case.
After closing arguments, the court charges the jury. The court submits five counts
for the jury to consider:
1. Attempted murder in the second degree (Intent to kill)
2. Assault in the first degree (Serious physical injury)
3. Assault in the second degree (Physical injury)
4. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Possession with the
intent to use unlawfully)
5. Criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Loaded firearm)
The judge charges counts 1, 2 and 3 in the alternative. This means that the jury
can only convict the defendant of one of these counts. The judge likewise charges counts
4 and 5 in the alternative. In practical terms, the jury must consider the highest count
first. They may not consider the lesser counts unless they first acquit the defendant of the
higher count.
You are now in the role of the jury. You have the entire case before you. How do
you resolve the charges against Randolph? Explain why you reached that verdict.
Be as detailed as you can with your explanation. Make sure that your answer is in your own words. If you plagiarize, you will receive a zero for the assignment. Additionally, you should have no quotes in you answer. You are not required to, but may want to use other sources to help you understand the content from the sources I provided. Make sure to give a list of citations for any additional sources you use. Once you have compiled and proofread your answer in a Word document, submit it via the Turnitin link.
Terms to know:
*Before you begin, use the internet to define the following terms:
Immunopathology, lymphopenia, and cytokine storm
General sources (background on human coronaviruses and more specifically on SARs CoV2):
*The coronavirus that causes COVID-19 is named SARs CoV.
A set of instructions to students doing a mock trial for an English or Theater class. The goal of the trial is to determine if Friar Laurence is guilty of performing an illegal marriage.
Peck Parties and Predictive Coding Update - 100813Rob Robinson
From descriptions to discussions to diatribes, many individuals and organizations have attempted to inform and influence opinion in regard to the recent and ongoing predictive coding related transcripts, objections, declarations, opinions and orders in the matter of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).
To help individuals form their own opinion in regard to predictive coding in relation to this matter from the original court documents, provided below is a single PDF document that consolidates key individual court documents into a single source for ease of study and consideration.
Combined PDF of Key Documents Highlighting Judicial Consideration of Predictive Coding through the Lens of Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y).
Need Original 300 words discussion on the below QuestionsEach of.docxrosemarybdodson23141
Need Original 300 words discussion on the below Questions
Each of the Scriptures below concern a given criminal procedure topic. All Scriptures are from the New International Version, 1984. Begin this assignment by meditating on the given Scriptures. You may even want to pray about them. Psalm 119:18 recommends this prayer: “Open my eyes that I may see wonderful things in your law.” Once you have done that, answer the questions below.
Witnesses
Deuteronomy 19:15 "One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses."
Deuteronomy 17:6 "On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness."
Cross Examination
Proverbs 18:17 "The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him."
Deuteronomy 19:16–19 "If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime, the two men involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against his brother, then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the evil from among you."
Physical Evidence
Deuteronomy 22:13–18 "If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” then the girl’s father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. The girl’s father will say to the elders, "I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, ‘I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.’ But here is the proof of my daughter’s virginity." Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him."
Exodus 22:12-13 "But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner. If it was torn to pieces by a wild animal, he shall bring in the remains as evidence and he will not be required to pay for the torn animal."
Answer the following questions for your thread:
· Did these Scriptures change or confirm your views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic?
· How does our current system deal with each topic?
· How could our current system change (or not) to deal with each topic in a more biblical manner?
· Provide at least 1 reference and 1 different Scripture (other than those given above) in support of your post.
Need Original 300 words discussion on the below Questions
Each of the Scriptures below concern a given criminal procedure topic.
All Scriptures are from
the New International Version, 1984. Begin this assignment by medita.
..--12 Dissenting Puritan knowledge that there are such r.docxmercysuttle
. Write 6.3% as an equivalent decimal. (Points : 1)
6.3
0.063
0.63
630
None of the above
Question 2. 2. Write 0.43 as an equvalent fraction. (Points : 1)
43/10
43/100
43/1000
43/10,000
None of the above
Question 3. 3. Write 0.382 as an equivalent percent(%). (Points : 1)
0.382%
3.82%
38.2%
382%
None of the above
Question 4. 4. What percent of 60 is 15? (Points : 1)
4%
0.25%
400
25%
None of the above
Question 5. 5. Simply (-1/3) + (-5/6) (Points : 1)
-2/3
-7/6
5/18
7/6
None of the above
Question 6. 6.
32 – 22
52 – 42
(Points : 1)
1.00
0.44
0.56
-1.00
None of the above
Question 7. 7.
Evaluate -8x2 + 7x – 1 for x = -2
(Points : 1)
-47
-19
-2
-8
None of the above
Question 8. 8. If F(x) = 7.50x - 20,000 then find F(1000). (Points : 1)
-12,500
7,500
35,000
80,000
None of the above
Question 9. 9.
Given the formula A = P (1 + r/k)n compute A (rounded to two decimal places) if P = 2,000, r = 0.06, k = 365, and n = 365.
(Points : 1)
773,800.00
730,120.00
687,512.00
2,123.66
Question 10. 10. Solve for x: x - 15 = 200 (Points : 1)
x = 185
x = -185
x = 215
x = -215
None of the above
Question 11. 11. Sam earns $31,400 one year and receives a 4% raise in salary. What is his new salary? (Points : 1)
$32,656
$37,500
$35,400
$34,540
None of the above
Question 12. 12. A quality control inspector examined 42 light bulbs and found 7 defective. At this rate, how many defective bulbs will be in a lot of 2,682 light bulbs? (Points : 1)
161
447
383
64
None of the above
Question 13. 13.
Solve for x: x – 7
5 = 2
(Points : 1)
x = 9
x = 17
x = -17
x = 9
None of the above
Question 14. 14. Solve for x: 8 - 3x < 23 (Points : 1)
x > 5
x > -5
x < -5
x < 5
None of the above
Question 15. 15. Find the slope of the line 3x + 5y = 16. (Points : 1)
3/5
-3/5
5/3
-5/3
None of the above
Question 16. 16. Fine the slope and y-intercept for the line y = 2x - 3 (Points : 1)
slope=2, y-intercept (0,3)
slope=2, y-intercept (0,-3)
slope=-3, y-intercept (0,2)
slope=3, y-intercept (0,2)
None of the above
Question 17. 17. Fine the equation of the line containing the following two points: (0,9) and (-3,0) (Points : 1)
y = -3x + 9
y = 3x + 9
y = -9x - 3
y = 9x - 3
None of the above
Question 18. 18. Graph the equation 4x - y = -4 (Points : 1)
None of the above
Question 19. 19. Fin ...
DNA Testing in Civil and Criminal Matters.pptxpatrons legal
Get insights into DNA testing and its application in civil and criminal matters. Find out how it contributes to fair and accurate legal proceedings. For more information: https://www.patronslegal.com/criminal-litigation.html
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...
Jennifer graziano sentencing 04 2001
1. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9·
10
11
12
21
22
23
24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~
x
UNITED STATES OP AMERICA,
-against-
JENNIFER GRAZIANO,
Defendant.
x
u.~ o'!:~ ~~olit. >~/.~"'"' ......
"'T"' n>".ra ..
4(Jc . "" ~~~
))4.,.. p ) () '
CR 00-1"'17q.~~<10gg-i!'J:.
. Jf
~United States Courthouse
Brooklyn, New York
April 20, 2001
12:15 o'clock p.m.
TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING
BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHARLES P. SIPTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LORETTA E. LYNCH
United States Attorney
BY: RUTH NORDENBROOK
1
Assistant United States Attorney
One Pierrepont Plaza
...
cou:r;:p,.·~~Reporter :...
Brooklyn, New York
PAUL LEMOLE, ESQ .
Gene Rudolph
225 Cadman Plaza East
Brooklyn, New York
(718) 260-2538
Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography, transcript
25 produced by computer-aided transcription.
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
2. 1 THE CLERK: The United States versus Jennifer
2 Graziano, criminal cause for sentencing.
3 THE COURT: All right. Who is representing the
4 prosecution in this matter?
5 MS. NORDENBROOK: Ruth Nordenbrook for the United
6 States, Your Honor.
7
8
9
10
THE COURT: And for --
MR. LBMOLE: Paul Lemole for the defendant.
Good afternoon, Judge.
THE COURT: Good afternoon.
11 Here again, I have a transcript of a plea before
12 Magistrate Judge Gold back in March of last year. Is there
13 any reason I shouldn't accept that plea, Mr. Lemole?
14 MR. LEMOLE: No, Judge.
15
16
17
THE COURT: Ms. Nordenbrook?
MS. NORDENBROOK: No, Your Honor.
THE COURT: All right. I have reviewed the
18 transcript. There is a factual basis for the plea. The
19 defendant was acting voluntarily, with knowledge of the
20 consequences of pleading guilty, so I will accept the plea.
2
21 Now, have you and your client, Mr. Lemole, seen both
22 the original presentence report and the addendum that was
23 prepared by the Probation Department?
24 MR. LEMOLE: I have, Judge.
25 THE DEFENDANT: I have too.
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
3. 3
1 THE COURT: Do you have any -- aside from the dispute
2 concerning the defendant's role adjustment and your
3 application for departure, do you have any other issues with
4 regard to the report?
5 MR. LEMOLE: Judge, just what I brought up in my
6 sentencing memorandum. That would be --
7 THE COURT: Did that summarize it? There is a
8 dispute as to the role and also an application for departure?
9 MR. LEMOLE: Yes, it does.
1O THE COURT: Okay. Any issues you have with regard to
11 the report, Ms. Nordenbrook?
MS. NORDENBROOK: NoI Your Honor.12
13 THE COURT: I also have from both sides -- well, I
14 have Mr. Lemole 1
s submissions, a sentencing memorandum and a
15 report, a thorough report, by the -- is it a psychiatrist?
16 Psychologist?
17 MR. LEMOLE: Two of them, Judge. Doctor Hughes, I
18 believe, and Doctor Heffernan.
19 THE COURT: I have examined the psychologist report
20 of Doctor Hughes and the report of Doctor Berrill. So tell
21 me -- I have to say this, whatever I do in terms of
22 the -- what position do you take on the role adjustment?
23 MS. NORDENBROOK: That the -- the role recommended in
24 the PSR is an appropriate one. It is supported by the
25 evidence in the case.
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
4. 4
1 THE COURT: All right . I don't want your argument.
2 I just want your position.
3 You are taking -- since I didn't see that in writing
4 anywhere in your submissions.
5 MR. LEMOLE: Judge, in the written plea agreement, if
6 I might?
7 THE COURT: I realize that. But I am asking what
8 position the prosecutor is taking now. She says she is
9 supporting the Probation Department.
10 MS. NORDENBROOK: I'm sorry. No, I stand by the --
11 I'm sorry. The one in the plea agreement. I'm sorry, Your
12 Honor .
13
14
15
THE COURT: Okay.
MS. NORDENBROOK: I'm sorry. I thought --
THE COURT: All right. All right. That 1 s where you
16 both are. I have to make an independent determination on the
17 subject. At least I know what the parties' positions are.
18 What I started to say was, whatever impact
19 this - - the psychological evaluations are going to have on the
20 sentence, and given the offense level, it is hard to see
21 that's going to have any enormously large effect on the
22 sentenc.e.
23 This is just a terrible -- terribly upsetting picture
24 of the life you have been living. It is just -- I mean, to
25 a - - to an outsider, who doesn't know you, to see what you
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
5. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
have had to put up in your - - in your relationships is just
astounding.
5
It put me in mind, Ms. Nordenbrook, of years ago, you
had a - - I don't think any direct involvement, but you had
some invol vement with a notorious case, of a woman who was
abused by her by her husband or whatever it was, and that
there have - - partly as a result of that case, there have
grown up support groups and people with expertise in this area
who I think could do a great deal to help out whatever the
sentence is. You have been in this area for a long while,
Ms. Nordenbrook. Maybe you are in a position to pass on to
Ms. Graziano, whatever the disposition here is, some of these
support groups who can intervene in situations like this.
Not -- not only with regard to the people who commit the abuse
but also with regard to the victims who have such a difficult
time for reasons that are so difficult for an outsider to
understand.
Am I right in thinking you•ve got information of that
sort or not?
MS . NORDENBROOK: My involvement years ago was more
with abused children, Your Honor. I am not -- I'm sure that I
could --
THE COURT: The Probation Department probably has
24 something. If you have any information.
25 All right. Let's get back to the matter at hand,
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
6. 6
1 which is the sentence here.
2 Mr. Lemole, tell me anything further you want to add
3 to your submissions.
4 MR. LEMOLE: Well, Judge, I really don't have too
5 much to add to my submissions. I asked Your Honor for a
6 downward departure basically for various identified bases.
7 Namely, her extraordinary family circumstance, and not that I
8 want to rehash what I wrote because I thought what I submitted
9 to Your Honor was as complete as I could make it.
10 But here is a girl, Judge, notwithstanding her
11 psychological problems, diagnosed disorders, which is even
12 supported by the government psychologist, Judge, she stands
13 before the Court with a one-and-three-quarter-two-year-old
14 child, Judge, who who is basically, if I might, JUdge,
15 a -- a product of an interracial relationship. Her family,
16 Judge, doesn't look kindly upon it. Her family can't take
17 care of this child. They won't take care of it. They won't
18 treat this child like a, quotes, white human being.
19 I put in the papers, Judge, as much as the limit
20 would push it, to show the Court that a sentence of jail will
21 take this child away from this mother and deprive the child of
22 a healthy and emotionally healthy youth and he won't bond with
23 her mother, nor will the child be able to, if you will,
24 acknowledge its black heritage and the child will be left in
25 the hands of her family during a period of incarceration and
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
7. 7
1 certainly their influence will not be good.
2 Your Honor has seen in the Probation report some
3 references to the household which she now lives and she only
4 lives there because she is forced to live there, in a sense,
5 that she doesn't know her future. To go out and get her own
6 apartment would be a mistake without knowing what her sentence
7 would be.
8 But, Judge, that is, I submit to Your Honor, an
9 extraordinary family circumstance, particularly in light of
10 the racial aspect of this child. Without going
11 THE COURT: What's the prospect of release of
12 this -- of the husband?
13 MR. LEMOLB: Nil, Judge.
14 THE COURT: No. How long -- he's going to be --
15 MR. LEMOLE: I think he's going to be prosecuted for
16 a homicide.
17 MS. NORDENBROOK: It's -- I don't think it is clear.
18 THE COURT: For some substantial period of time?
19 All right. Go ahead.
20 MR. LEMOLE: Judge, in addition, again, not to rehash
21 my memorandum, but we spoke about -- we addressed the Court
22 about her diminished capacity. Although it is not a defense
23 to the case, we wanted to make the Court aware of that. I
24 could not bring her psychological problems basically to say it
25 was causative of her criminal conduct but neither could the
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
8. 8
1 goverrunent bring it to say it was not causative.
2 This woman, regardless of what those psychologists do
3 say. Is obviously a victim and of a battered woman
4 syndrome, Judge, of a man that has a relationship with her,
5 ordered her to do something. She did it. And that's the seat
6 of her problem, although neither psychologists of the three
7 mention that because that apparently is a -- is a symptom as
8 opposed to a diagnostic condition.
9 But that's -- that is her -- right from being brought
10 up, that's what this girl is, an automaton, Judge. I ask the
11 Court to depart for that reason.
12 During this period, Judge, this girl bas gone to drug
13 rehabilitation. She still does. She is she is still in
14 drug rehabilitation program now for sixteen months or so. She
15 continues to see a psychologist for help, with her mental
16 problem.
17 And I ask the Court in view of all these factors,
18 namely, the child and the particular facts, that racial
19 situation, and the age of this baby, and the particular and
20 peculiar needs of this child, and together with the other
21 reasons, cumulative factors, Judge, basically I'm asking for a
22 downward departure on all those grounds.
23 Judge, other than that, I have nothing further to
24 say, other than I just want to make it clear, the goverrunent
25 agreed with the defendant to the three point role, not to the
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
9. 9
1 four point role. I put in my papers that since the government
2 knows its case better than anybody in the world, and their
3 agreement to the three points, I'd ask Your Honor to abide the
4 government's three points.
5 I have nothing further to say, Judge.
6 THE COURT: All right. Ms. Nordenbrook?
7 MS. NORDENBROOK: Your Honor, with regard to the
8 defendant's claim that she acted as an automaton as a result
9 of posttraumatic stress disease, we note the following. First
10 we note that in large measure any diagnosis is based on
11 self report and -- to the psychologists who are doing the
12 analysis.
13 Ms. Graziano has a masters degree in psychology. So
14 we assert that the bases -- she has some knowledge about what
15 one has to claim in order to meet the diagnoses under these
16 various diseases.
17 Having said that, I would point out, Doctor Berrill
18 concluded that although there was evidence of posttraumatic
19 stress disease, quote, based on Ms. Graziano 1
s self report and
20 an examination of information available to this examiner,
21 there does not seem to be a substantive connection between
22 Ms. Graziano•s symptomatology and her willingness to engage in
23 a criminal exercise, unquote.
24 Now, in Ms. Graziano's submissions neither doctor
25 makes a causative link between the two illnesses. In fact,
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
10. 1 the abuser, the former boyfriend, and Ms. Graziano ceased
2 their association totally over a year before she engaged in
3 this criminal conduct.
4 THE COURT: Don't get beyond your field,
5 Ms. Nordenbrook.
6
7
MS. NORDENBROOK: I am just -- all right.
THE COURT: I happen to be quite familiar with
10
a posttraumatic stress syndrome and it's all about things that
9 happen in the past, not about things that are happening.
10 MS. NORDENBROOK: I have a final observation.
11 THE COURT: Go ahead.
12 MS. NORDENBROOK: That is based on the recorded
13 conversations by Ms. Graziano. That recorded conversations of
14 Ms. Graziano, which contrary to her claims do not show a
15 depressed automaton.
16 For instance, in
17 THE COURT: That wasn't the defendant's words
18 herself. That's the lawyer's words. That's not a symptom of
19 the ailment either.
20 In any event, go ahead.
21 MS. NORDENBROOK: Well, these conversations show her
22 very much an active, conscious free participant, and director
23 of the activities of other people in these -- in this
24 conspiracy.
25 On October 6, 1999, she was intercepted directing her
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
11. 1 brother-in-law Hector Pagan on who to deal with on that
2 particular day.
11
3 On October 7, 1999, she directed Hector Pagan to mix
4 poor quality marijuana with better quality marijuana and just
s sell it together.
6 She also instructed Hector Pagan on that day on how
7 many containers he was to give each runner.
8 Finally, Hector Pagan, who wanted to change his pay
9 day, asked Ms. Graziano if he could have his pay day on
10 another day beside Friday, and she agreed.
11 In a conversation on October 18, it is a conversation
12 not between Ms. Graziano and someone but, rather, an -- I have
13 excerpted these for the purposes of -- for the purposes of
14 this hearing. These are in the complaint and were a part of
15 the complaint.
16 In the conversation on October 18, one of the runners
17 is objecting to being directed by Mr. Pagan and Ms. Sanchez,
18 a.nd he says - - he says - - I 'm sorry. He goes, isn 1
t that up
19 to Jenn, indicating his belief that what he is supposed to do
20 and how he is supposed to conduct himself is subject to the
21 direction of Ms. Graziano rather than of Mr. Pagan.
22 In that -- and in that same conversation -- oh, in a
23 subsequent conversation on October 21, she semi upbraids
24 Mr. Pagan for distributing what they call popcorn, which means
25 small pieces that aren't welcomed by their customers in the
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
12. 12
1 same way that better quality marijuana is, and she says that
2 she doesn't want Mr. Pagan to distribute any more popcorn.
3 She also approves Mr. Pagan's use of Daniel Costanzo
4 as --
5
6
7
8
THE COURT: All right.
MS. NORDENBROOK: -- as a source of supply.
THE COURT: I get the point.
MR. LEMOLE: May I be heard on those two issues? The
9 medical report? The psychologist report?
10 THE COURT: Okay.
11 MR. LEMOLE: If not
12 THE COURT: Go ahead. Go ahead.
13 MR. LEMOLE: Judge, the medical - - the psychological
14 report that Ms. Nordenbrook referred to by Doctor Berrill
15 interestingly states, I asked Jennifer if she could connect
16 the psychological problems to her -- to her involvement in the
17 instant offense. Ms. Graziano had a difficult time doing so.
18 Indeed, it's unusual to me that the -- the
19 interviewing psychologist would ask the patient, so to speak,
20 or the person who labors from the disorder, can you give the
21 connection and that•s one of the basis
22 THE COURT: Did either of you even look at the
23 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and consider what we are
24 talking about here? I don't think either of you have the
25 slightest idea --
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
13. 13
MS. NORDENBROOK: I did look --1
2 THE COURT: -- what this ailment is. I mean, you are
3 just talking. You are lawyers. You are not doctors.
4 MR. LEMOLE: I am trying to respond.
5 THE COURT: I've got the doctor's report. I can
6 evaluate the doctor's report myself, with the assistance of
7 professional sources.
8
9
10
MR. LEMOLE: Judge, just one further comment.
THE COURT: What?
MR. LBMOLE: On the tape that Ms. Nordenbrook
11 referred to, at page six, she referred to a statement, you
12 know, isn't that up to Jenn. Ms. Nordenbrook failed to state
13 the next sentence says, the person says no, it is not up to
14 her. And later on says, all she is good for is trying to get
15 a lawyer for Ramon.
16 THE COURT: All right. There we go.
17 All right. Ms. Graziano, is there anything that you
18 would like to say yourself in your own words before I impose
19 sentence?
20 THE DEFENDANT: I would like -- I would like to -- to
21 say that I am sorry to the Court and to the judge -- to you
22 and to the government, but mostly to my son who is the most
23 important thing that I'm here for today and I don't -- I don't
24 want -- I'm sorry. I shamed him and put him in a situation
25 where I might be taken away from him.
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
14. 14
1 I just -- I could stand here and I could honestly say
2 that this is something that I would never have normally done
3 in my right life. I don't know how I got into this life. It
4 was just crazy things and I would never do it again. That's
5 for sure. I can say that with all of my certainty and I'm
6 sorry. I just apologize.
7 THE COURT: All right. Well, you are right, that the
a child is in a sense has been, but in the future will be,
9 the biggest victim here unless you figure out how to protect
10 him and you've got to get out of this situation, these
11 relationships, which -- of which you have been the primary
12 victim up to now but he's going to be the victim in the future
13 if you don't get both him and yourself into a new way of
14 living.
15 There are -- the reason I mentioned this, these
16 resources, these women's groups, let's say what we are talking
17 about. There are women's groups out there who can help you
18 put yourself in a frame of mind so that neither you or, I
19 think most important, your son is abused in the future as a
20 result of the unfortunate circumstances, I don't know what
21 they are, that led you to be what you•re like in the past and
22 what you're like right now.
23 This posttraumatic stress syndrome, I don't question
24 the reality of it, but as you probably know better than the
25 lawyers, having had the education you have had, it is
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
15. 15
1 something the prisoners had coming out of Korea, just a
2 reliving of the experience for a period of time that doesn't
3 make you depressed. It just puts you out of commission. It
4 is a short -- terrifying short term reaction to things. It
5 doesn't explain why people do or don't function or how they
6 function.
7 I have to agree with the prosecutor, that
8 during -- that you functioned reasonably well on an every day
9 basis, both in running this drug operation and in the absence
10 of this fellow who fortunately has been locked up.
11 I think the role adjustment that the lawyers have
12 agreed to is probably a more accurate picture of your role
13 than the one that the Probation Department assigned to you
14 because I believe that what happened here was you took over a
15 drug operation of a probably fairly scary person. You
16 seem I mean, I guess you grew up in a fairly scary family
17 and you certainly surrounded yourself with frightening people
18 and you've just got to figure out a way to stand independently
19 of them, to protect because these people turn on you and
20 they'll turn on your son.
21 So one thing I know, as I have said already, is I am
22 going to certainly recommend to the Bureau of Prisons that you
23 receive the best psychotherapy they can give you to deal with
24 this, but I hope while you are in prison you are able through
25 correspondence or otherwise to get in touch with the people
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
16. 1 you are going to need once you get out of prison to prepare
2 you for the day when this -- these rather terrifying
3 individuals seek you out again, and seek out your son.
16
4 In any event, I am going to -- aside from adjusting
5 the offense level to indicate a lower role, I am not going to
6 depart, both because I don't think this very real
7 psychological problem that you have had in fact was the cause
8 of, at least not the psychological cause of doing what you
9 did, and I don't think I can say that reducing your sentence
10 would assist in the treatment of your -- I don't think you've
11 handled your family responsibilities very well up to now. I
12 think there is a possibility for the future, but I don't think
13 it would help your son much.
14
15 taken
I think your son will be, as best I can judge it,
safe and taken care of for the time you are going to
16 be in prison, and in a way perhaps more safe than he'll be if
17 you don't -- if you are taking care of him and don't get ahold
18 of the problems that you have and will bring on him if you
19 don't figure out how to get out of these abusive
20 relationships.
21 So I am going to sentence you to the custody of the
22 Attorney General for a period of twenty-one months, to be
23 followed by a three-year period of supervision.
24 During the period of supervision, I am going to
25 direct that you follow the directions of the Probation
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
17. 17
1 Department with regard to psychotherapy.
2 I am going to impose the one-hundred-dollar special
3 assessment that is required by law; and I am not going to
4 impose a fine because financially you are not in a position to
5 pay one.
6 On application of the government, I will dismiss --
7 thi.s is a single count.
8 MS. NORDENBROOK: Yes, it is, Your Honor.
9 THE COURT: So you may have a right to appeal this
10 sentence. If you wish to pursue an appeal, you must file a
11 notice of appeal within ten days. If you lack the funds to
12 pay the costs of the appeal, the costs can be waived, and an
13 attorney can be appointed to represent you at no cost to you.
14 I am going to fix a date in June for your surrender
15 at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons.
16 I would recommend, actually -- well, I am not going
17 to make a recommendation as to the facility without giving
18 your attorneys an opportunity to look -- consider the
19 options. There are, for example, in the women's detention
20 facility in Lexington, Kentucky, there is, I believe, better
21 medical resources for women than are available here in the
22 New York metropolitan area. But probably if you are able
23 through friends to maintain contact with your child here but
24 not through visits in Lexington, probably would be better to
25 have you here with such medical assistance as you can get.
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com
18. 1 I think the best medical assistance you can -- you
2 will eventually get will be more specialized than anything,
3 unfortunately, the Bureau of Prisons can give you.
18
4 MR. LEMOLE: Would Your Honor recommend a local -- a
5 prison within the proximity of New York City or Jersey because
6 of the fact that she does want to see her child?
7 THE COURT: All right. If that's what you would like
8 to do, I can't say that Lexington is that much better. But
9 you've got a lot of work ahead of you.
10 MR. LEMOLE: Would Your Honor consider recommending
11 the shock program?
12 THE COURT: No.
13 Okay. The shock program? Come on.
14 MS. NORDENBROOK: Thank you, Your Honor.
15 (Matter concludes.}
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
GR OCR CM CSR
www.realitytvscandals.com