This document discusses embedding a dual purpose repository for unconventional teaching materials. It references innovation theory models for ease of use, engagement, educational effectiveness and environment. It questions whether a repository is an improvement, matches values, and is easy to use, noting repositories often have a slow rate of adoption. The document also references growing mandates and advocacy campaigns to promote repositories through brochures, posters, web links and committees to establish local champions and editors.

1. Embedding a dual purpose repository Julian Beckton (Sort of!)

3. Unconventional teaching materials

5. Lightbox functionality

6. Innovation theory 4-Es Model Ease of Use Engagement Educational Effectiveness Environment Collis & Moonen (1991) Diffusion of Innovation Is it an improvement? Matches values? Easy to use? Slow rate of adoption? Visible Benefits Rogers (1962)

8. Repository What Repository?

9. Runtime Support?

11. Is this YOUR Repository?

12. Growing mandates

15. The future Advocacy Campaign Launch Glossy brochure Posters Web links and feeds Collegial work Committees (Research, Teaching & Learning) Local champions (and ultimately editors?) Statistics (Google Analytics)