This document contains an evaluation of teacher Imelda Aguillon by her principal Alexis Balanza for the 2016-2017 school year. It evaluates her performance in several key result areas including teaching and learning process, student outcomes, community involvement, and professional growth and development. For each area, it lists objectives, performance indicators, actual results, and ratings. Overall, it shows that Ms. Aguillon met or exceeded expectations for all objectives, with ratings of 90-100% for each performance indicator. She is rated highly for preparing daily logs and materials, monitoring attendance, maintaining cleanliness, evaluating student progress, conducting parent meetings, and participating in school activities.

1. Name of Employee: IMELDA C. AGUILLON Name of Rater: ALEXIS S. BALANZA
Position: TEACHER I Position: School Principal I
Division: ANTIQUE Date of Review: _______________
Rating Period School Year 2016- 2017
PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
Q E T AVE
TEACHING –
LEARNING
PROCESS
Prepareddailylogs
of activities
including
appropriate,
adequateand
updated
instructional
materials
Monitored
attendanceof
students in School
Form 2and
initiated
interventions to
from the first to the
last day of classes
June 2016 –
March 2017
June 2016 –
March 2017
(35%)
15%
10%
90% Prepared/Updated
dailylogs includingthe
appropriateinstructional
materialsregularlyand
validated by the school
principaleveryFridayof the
weekor as scheduled;
Data/Entries werecomplete;
Filedfrom June - March
100%Checked attendance
daily (AM and PM); Weekly
attendance sheets were
validated by the subject
teachers and filed regularly.
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

2. Maintained
cleanliness,
beautification,
orderlinessand
overall physical
atmosphere
includingproper
waste disposalin
the classroom and
schoolgardens/
schoolpremisesall
the time
June 2016 –
March 2017
10% 100% Maintained
cleanliness,beautification
andorderlinessinthe
classroom andtheschool
gardens/schoolpremisesall
the time or anytimeof the
day, morningandafternoon;
Properwaste segregation
was observed
PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
Q E T AVE
STUDENTS
OUTCOMES
Monitored,
evaluated and
maintained
students’ progress
withinthe rating
period
June 2016 –
March 2017
(30%)
10%
100%Evidencesshowed
that the teacherpurposely
plansassessmentsand
varies assessmentchoices
to matchthe different
student needs,abilities,and
learningstyles every
quarter; Classrecords
reflected96%- 100%

3. Maintained
updatedstudents’
schoolrecords
every quarter
Attained the
requiredGeneral
Scholastic Aptitude
(GSA)/ Mean
PercentageScore
(MPS)for grade
level and learning
areas
June 2016 –
March 2017
June 2016 –
March 2017
10%
10%
passinggradesin allclasses
handled;Student’sportfolios
contained96%-100%of his
accomplishments
100%Accomplishedand
submittedaccurateand
updatedstudents’school
recordssuchReportCards,
Form 137-A, Form 9, and
AnecdotalRecordslessthan
a weekafter the quarterly
assessment
ApplicableforGSA only:
5 – 100%GSA
4 – 85% - 99%GSA
3 – 70% - 84%GSA
2 – 55% - 69%GSA
1 – 54% andBelow
ApplicableforMPS only:
5 – 75% - 100%MPS
4 – 59% - 74%MPS
3 – 42% - 58%MPS
2 – 26% - 41%MPS
1 – 25% andBelow

4. PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
Q E T AVE
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
Conductedregular/
periodic PTA
meetings/
conferences
Visited parents of
students needing
academic
monitoring/follow
up
Undertaken/
initiatedprojects/
events/activities
with external
funding
/sponsorship
June 2016 –
March 2017
June 2016 –
March 2017
June2016 –
March2017
(15%)
5%
5%
5%
100% Facilitatedthe
conductofPTAHomeroom
meetings/conferenceswith
96%- 100%attendanceof
parents; Minutesof the
meetingsprepared,
validated andfiled;
Accomplished96%-100%
on agreement/plan/project
set
100%Conductedhome
visitation on students with
problemsthriceamonth;
Homevisitation form was
accomplishedandvalidated
by parent’ssignature
Accomplishedalmost85%
with
agreement/concern/project
set

5. PLANNING EVALUATION
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
Weight
per KRA
PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)
ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
SCORE
Q E T AVE
PROFESSIONAL
GROWTHAND
DEVELOPMENT Initiated/participat
ed inco-curricular
schoolactivities
withinthe rating
period
Conducted
problem/
classroom-based
Action Research
withinthe school
year
Receivedspecial
awards/citation/re
cognitionfor
exemplary
performanceby
endof the year
June 2016 –
March 2017
(20%)
10%
5%
5%
Conductedhomevisitation
on students withproblems
onceamonth; Home
visitation and validatedby
parent’ssignature
Participatedinmostof co-
curricular/ schoolactivities
with documentedresults
Accomplished
project/event/activitywith
the following documents;
Projectproposaland
CompletionReport
(includingtheFinancial
Reportand photo
documentation)
OVERALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT
ALEXIS S. BALANZA IMELDA C. AGUILLON MA. ROSELYN J. PALCAT, EdD, CESE
School Principal I Teacher I Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Rater Ratee Approving Authority