Download as DOCX, PPTX
Uploaded byChristine David
Ipcrf christine d. david
This document contains a performance review of Christine D. David by Pepito C. Celestino for her work as a Teacher I from May 2015 to March 2016. It evaluates her performance on 5 key result areas (KRAs) based on objectives, performance indicators, actual results, and ratings. Each KRA is assigned a weight and she receives a score for each based on her level of accomplishment of the objectives as Outstanding, Very Satisfactory, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory, or Poor. Her overall rating is calculated by multiplying her ratings by the assigned weights for each KRA.
More Related Content
Similar to Ipcrf christine d. david
Ipcrf christine d. david
- 1. Name of Employee:CHRISTINE D. DAVID Name of Rater: PEPITO C. CELESTINO Position: TEACHER I Position: HT III ReviewPeriod: MAY 2015 – MARCH 2016 Date of Review: Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT per KRA PERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency, Timelessness) ACTUAL RESULTS RATINGS SCORE I – TEACHING – LEARNING PROCESS 1. Prepare dailylessonlogsof activitiesincludingappropriate and adequate andupdated instructional materials. 2. Facilitate learninginsecondary schoolsthroughfunctional daily logsand innovative teaching strategies. June, 2015- March 2016 10% 10% 5 – Outstanding Attained130% and above of the desiredlearning competencies. 4 – Very Satisfactory Attained115 - 129% of the desiredlearningcompetencies 3 – Satisfactory Attained100 – 114% of the desiredlearningcompetencies. 2 – Unsatisfactory Attained51 – 99% of the desiredlearningcompetencies. 1 – Poor 50% andbelowof the desired learningcompetencies. 5 – Outstanding The goal reflectedarange of studentlearnerneeds. 4 – Very Satisfactory The teacherexplainedthe importance of the goal and its Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form
- 2. 3. Initiate disciplineofstudents includingclassroomrules, guidelinesandindividual and grouptasks. 10% appropriatenesstostudents 3 – Satisfactory The teacherclearly communicatedafocusfor studentlearning 2 – Unsatisfactory The teacherdidnot have a clearfocus forstudentlearning 1 – Poor The objective isinappropriate for students. 5 – Outstanding Learnerswere 130% and above guidedinthe observationof classroomrulesandguidelines as evidencedbydescriptive ratingin the reportcard. 4 – Very Satisfactory Learnerswere 115 – 129% guidedinthe observationof classroomrulesandguidelines as evidencedbydescriptive ratingin the reportcard. 3- Satisfactory Learnerswere 100 – 114% guidedinthe observationof classroomrulesandguidelines as evidencedbydescriptive ratingin the reportcard. 2 – Unsatisfactory Learnerswere 51 – 99% guided inthe observationof classroom rulesandguidelinesas evidencedbydescriptive rating inthe reportcard.
- 3. II – STUDENTS DEVELOPMENT1.Monitor,evaluate andmaintain students’ progress 2. Maintainupdatedstudents’ school records. June, 2015- March 2016 10% 10% 1 – Poor Learnerswere notguidedin the observationof classroom rulesandguidelines as evidencedbydescriptive rating inthe reportcard. 5 – Outstanding Classrecord reflectedthe bases of 130% andabove of learners’ ratingsinall classes/subject areas handled. 4 – Very Satisfactory Classrecord reflectedthe bases of 115 – 129% learners’ratings inall classes/subjectareas handled. 3-Satisfactory Classrecord reflectedthe bases of 100-114% of learners’ ratingsinall classes/subject areas handled. 2 – Unsatisfactory Classrecord reflectedthe bases of 51 – 99% of learners’ratings inall classes/subjectareas handled. 1 – Poor Classrecord reflectedthe bases of 50% and belowof learners’ ratingsinall classes/subject areas handled. 5 – Outstanding Students’ school recordswere 130% and above systematically
- 4. 3. AdoptK-12 througha meaningfulinnovativeand holisticdevelopment. 5% carriedout. 4 – Very Satisfactory Students’ school recordswere 115 – 129% systematically carriedout. 3-Satisfactory Students’ school recordswere 100 – 114% systematically carriedout. 2 – Unsatisfactory Students’ school recordswere 51 – 99% systematicallycarried out. 1 – Poor Students’ school recordswere not systematicallycarriedout. 5 – Outstanding Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited130% and above interactionfromaclass. 4 – Very Satisfactory Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited115-129% interactionfromaclass. 3 – Satisfactory Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited100-114% interactionfromaclass. 2 – Unsatisfactory Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited51-99% interactionfromaclass. 1 – Poor Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited50%and
- 5. III – PROFESSIONAL GROWTHAND DEVELOPMENT 1. Enhance the instructional competence forthe successful implementationof the K-12 program. 2. Participatedinactivitiessuch as teachersassociation,etc. June, 2015- March 2016 5% 5% belowinteractionfromaclass. 5 – Outstanding Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited130% and above interactionfromaclass. 4 – Very Satisfactory Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited115-129% interactionfromaclass. 3 – Satisfactory Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited100-114% interactionfromaclass. 2 – Unsatisfactory Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited51-99% interactionfromaclass. 1 – Poor Teachingmethodsand strategieselicited50%and belowinteractionfromaclass. 5 – Outstanding Initiatedatleast2 co- curricular/school activitieswith documentedresults. 4 – Very Satisfactory Initiatedandparticipatedinco- curricular/school activitieswith documentedresults. 3 – Satisfactory Participatedinmostco- curricular/school activitieswith
- 6. IV – RECORDS MANAGEMENT 3.Increase professional competencies. Prepare/file school recordssuch as: lessonlogs classrecords gradingsheet attendance sheets accomplishmentrepots June, 2015- March 2016 5% 10% documentedresults. 2 – Unsatisfactory Participationonlywithout documentedresults. 1 – Poor No participationinschool activities. 5 – Outstanding Initiatedatleast2 co- curricular/school activitieswith documentedresults. 4 – Very Satisfactory Initiatedandparticipatedinco- curricular/school activitieswith documentedresults. 3 – Satisfactory Participatedinmostco- curricular/school activitieswith documentedresults. 2 – Unsatisfactory Participationonlywithout documentedresults. 1 – Poor No participationinschool activities. 5 – Outstanding Performsandrepresents extraordinarylevel of achievement 4 – Very Satisfactory Performance exceeded expectations
- 7. V – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1.Organize andmaintain functional HomeroomPTA. 10% 3 – Satisfactory Performance met expectations 2 –Unsatisfactory Performance failedtomeet expectations 5 – Poor Performance was consistentlybelow expectations 5 – Outstanding 130% and above accomplishmentwithset agreementsmet. 4 – Very Satisfactory 115 – 129% plannedmeetings conductedproducingonlyset agreementsandpartial accomplishmentsof these. 3 – Satisfactory 100-114% of plannedmeetings conductedproducingsetof agreements. 2 – Unsatisfactory 51 – 99% of plannedmeetings conductedproducingminimal results. 1 – Poor 50% andbelowof planned meetingswithnoresults.
- 8. 2. Conduct periodicPTAmeeting. 3. Supportdifferentactivitiesof school. 5% 5% 5 – Outstanding 130% and above accomplishmentwithset agreementsmet. 4 – Very Satisfactory 115 – 129% plannedmeetings conductedproducingonlyset agreementsandpartial accomplishmentsof these. 3 – Satisfactory 100-114% of plannedmeetings conductedproducingsetof agreements. 2 – Unsatisfactory 51 – 99% of plannedmeetings conductedproducingminimal results. 1 – Poor 50% andbelowof planned meetingswithnoresults. 5 – Outstanding Initiatedandparticipatedat least2 co-curricular/school activitieswithdocumented results. 4 – Very Satisfactory Initiatedandparticipatedinco- curricular/school activitieswith documentedresults. 3 – Satisfactory Participatedinmostco- curricular/school activitieswith documentedresults. 2 – Unsatisfactory Participationonlywithout
- 9. documentedresults. 1 –Poor No participationinschool activities. OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLI - SHMENTS To get the score,the rating is multipliedbythe weightassigned _______________________________________________ _________________________________________ Rater Ratee