More Related Content
Similar to Inventory. management and cost control information (20)
Inventory. management and cost control information
- 2. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Outline (1 of 2)
• Global Company Profile: Amazon.com
• The Importance of Inventory
• Managing Inventory
• Inventory Models
• Inventory Models for Independent Demand
- 3. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Outline (2 of 2)
• Probabilistic Models and Safety Stock
• Single-Period Model
• Fixed-Period (P) Systems
- 4. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Inventory Management
The objective of inventory management is to strike a
balance between inventory investment and customer
service
- 5. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Importance of Inventory
• One of the most expensive assets of many companies
representing as much as 50% of total invested capital
• Less inventory lowers costs but increases chances of
shortages, which might stop processes or result in
dissatisfied customers
• More inventory raises costs but improves the likelihood of
meeting process and customer demands
- 6. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Types of Inventory
• Raw material
– Purchased but not processed
• Work-in-process (WIP)
– Undergone some change but not completed
– A function of flow time for a product
• Maintenance/repair/operating (MRO)
– Necessary to keep machinery and processes
productive
• Finished goods
– Completed product awaiting shipment
- 7. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The Material Flow Cycle
Figure 12.1
- 8. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Managing Inventory
1. How inventory items can be classified (ABC analysis)
2. How accurate inventory records can be maintained
- 9. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
ABC Analysis (1 of 5)
• Divides inventory into three classes based on annual
dollar volume
– Class A - high annual dollar volume
– Class B - medium annual dollar volume
– Class C - low annual dollar volume
• Used to establish policies that focus on the few critical
parts and not the many trivial ones
- 10. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
ABC Analysis (2 of 5)
Figure 12.2
- 11. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
ABC Analysis (3 of 5)
ABC Calculation
- 12. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Record Accuracy (1 of 2)
• Accurate records are a critical ingredient in production and inventory
systems
– Periodic systems require regular checks of inventory
Two-bin system
– Perpetual inventory tracks receipts and subtractions on a
continuing basis
May be semi-automated
- 13. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Record Accuracy (2 of 2)
• Incoming and outgoing
record keeping must be
accurate
• Stockrooms should be
secure
• Necessary to make precise
decisions about ordering,
scheduling, and shipping
- 14. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Cycle Counting
• Items are counted and records updated on a periodic
basis
• Often used with ABC analysis
• Has several advantages
1. Eliminates shutdowns and interruptions
2. Eliminates annual inventory adjustment
3. Trained personnel audit inventory accuracy
4. Allows causes of errors to be identified and corrected
5. Maintains accurate inventory records
- 15. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Cycle Counting Example
5,000 items in inventory, 500 A items, 1,750 B items, 2,750
C items
Policy is to count A items every month (20 working days), B
items every quarter (60 days), and C items every six months
(120 days)
ITEM CLASS QUANTITY
CYCLE COUNTING
POLICY
NUMBER OF ITEMS
COUNTED PER DAY
A 500 Each month 500/20 = 25/day
B 1,750 Each quarter 1,750/60 = 29/day
C 2,750 Every 6 months 2,750/120 = 23/day
blank blank blank 77/day
- 16. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Inventory Models (1 of 2)
• Independent demand - the demand for item is
independent of the demand for any other item in inventory
• Dependent demand - the demand for item is dependent
upon the demand for some other item in the inventory
- 17. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Inventory Models (2 of 2)
• Holding costs - the costs of holding or “carrying” inventory
over time
• Ordering cost - the costs of placing an order and receiving
goods
• Setup cost - cost to prepare a machine or process for
manufacturing an order
– May be highly correlated with setup time
- 18. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Holding Costs (1 of 2)
Table 12.1 Determining Inventory Holding Costs
CATEGORY
COST (AND RANGE)
AS A PERCENTAGE
OF INVENTORY VALUE
Housing costs (building rent or depreciation,
operating costs, taxes, insurance)
6% (3 - 10%)
Material handling costs (equipment lease or
depreciation, power, operating cost)
3% (1 - 3.5%)
Labor cost (receiving, warehousing, security) 3% (3 - 5%)
Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and
insurance on inventory)
11% (6 - 24%)
Pilferage, space, and obsolescence (much higher
in industries undergoing rapid change like tablets
and smart phones)
3% (2 - 5%)
Overall carrying cost 26%
- 19. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Holding Costs (2 of 2)
Table 12.1 Determining Inventory Holding Costs
CATEGORY
COST (AND RANGE)
AS A PERCENTAGE
OF INVENTORY VALUE
Housing costs (building rent or depreciation,
operating costs, taxes, insurance)
6% (3 - 10%)
Material handling costs (equipment lease or
depreciation, power, operating cost)
3% (1 - 3.5%)
Labor cost (receiving, warehousing, security) 3% (3 - 5%)
Investment costs (borrowing costs, taxes, and
insurance on inventory)
11% (6 - 24%)
Pilferage, space, and obsolescence (much higher
in industries undergoing rapid change like tablets
and smart phones)
3% (2 - 5%)
Overall carrying cost 26%
Holding costs vary considerably depending on the business, location, and
interest rates. Generally greater than 15%, some high tech and fashion
items have holding costs greater than 40%.
- 20. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Inventory Models for Independent
Demand
Need to determine when and how much to order
1. Basic economic order quantity (EOQ) model
2. Production order quantity model
3. Quantity discount model
- 21. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Inventory Usage Over Time
Figure 12.3
- 22. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Minimizing Costs (1 of 7)
Objective is to minimize total costs
Figure 12.4c
- 23. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Minimizing Costs (2 of 7)
• By minimizing the sum of setup (or ordering) and holding
costs, total costs are minimized
• Optimal order size Q* will minimize total cost
• A reduction in either cost reduces the total cost
• Optimal order quantity occurs when holding cost and setup
cost are equal
- 24. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Minimizing Costs (3 of 7)
The necessary steps are:
1. Develop an expression for setup or ordering cost
2. Develop an expression for holding cost
3. Set setup (order) cost equal to holding cost
4. Solve the equation for the optimal order quantity.
- 25. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Minimizing Costs (4 of 7)
Q = Number of units per order
Q* = Optimal number of units per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual setup cost Number of orders placed per year Setup or order cost per order
Annual demand
Setup or order cost per order
Number of units in each order
D
S
Q
- 26. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Minimizing Costs (5 of 7)
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual setup cost Number of orders placed per year Setup or order cost per order
Annual demand
Setup or order cost per order
Number of units in each order
D
S
Q
Annual setup cost =
D
S
Q
- 27. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Minimizing Costs (6 of 7)
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Annual holding cost Average inventory level Holding cost per unit per year
Order quantity
Holding cost per unit per year
2
Q
H
2
Annual setup cost =
D
S
Q
Annual holding cost =
2
Q
H
- 28. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Minimizing Costs (7 of 7)
Q = Number of pieces per order
Q* = Optimal number of pieces per order (EOQ)
D = Annual demand in units for the inventory item
S = Setup or ordering cost for each order
H = Holding or carrying cost per unit per year
Optimal order quantity is found when annual setup cost
equals annual holding cost
Solving for Q*
D Q
S H
Q 2
2
2
2
2
*
2DS = H
Q
DS
Q
H
DS
Q
H
Annual setup cost =
D
S
Q
Annual holding cost =
2
Q
H
- 29. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
An EOQ Example (1 of 6)
Determine optimal number of needles to order
D = 1,000 units
S = $10 per order
H = $.50 per unit per year
2
2(1,000)(10)
40,000 200 units
0.50
*
*
DS
Q
H
Q
- 30. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
An EOQ Example (2 of 6)
Determine expected number of orders
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order
H = $.50 per unit per year
Demand
Expected number of orders
Order quantity *
1,000
5 orders per year
200
D
N
Q
N
- 31. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
An EOQ Example (3 of 6)
Determine optimal time between orders
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders/year
H = $.50 per unit per year
Number of working days per year
Expected time between orders
Expected number of orders
250
50 days between orders
5
T
T
- 32. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
An EOQ Example (4 of 6)
Determine the total annual cost
D = 1,000 units Q* = 200 units
S = $10 per order N = 5 orders/year
H = $.50 per unit per year T = 50 days
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost
$100
$50
$50
)
(100)($.50
(5)($10)
($.50)
2
200
($10)
200
1,000
H
2
Q
S
Q
D
TC
- 33. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
The EOQ Model
When including actual cost of material P
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product cost
2
D Q
TC S H PD
Q
- 34. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Robust Model
• The EOQ model is robust
• It works even if all parameters and assumptions are not met
• The total cost curve is relatively flat in the area of the EOQ
- 35. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
An EOQ Example (5 of 6)
Ordering old Q*
2
1,500 200
($10) ($.50)
200 2
$75 $50 $125
D Q
TC S H
Q
Ordering new Q*
$122.47
$61.22
$61.25
0)
122.45($.5
6.125($10)
($.50)
2
244.9
($10)
244.9
1,500
- 36. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
An EOQ Example (6 of 6)
Only 2% less than
the total cost of
$125 when the
order quantity was
200
Ordering old Q*
2
1,500 200
($10) ($.50)
200 2
$75 $50 $125
D Q
TC S H
Q
Ordering new Q*
$122.47
$61.22
$61.25
0)
122.45($.5
6.125($10)
($.50)
2
244.9
($10)
244.9
1,500
- 37. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Reorder Points
• EOQ answers the “how much” question
• The reorder point (ROP) tells “when” to order
• Lead time (L) is the time between placing and receiving an
order
ROP = (Demand per day)(Lead time for a new order in days)
ROP =
Number of working days in a year
d L
D
d =
- 38. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Reorder Point Curve
Figure 12.5
- 39. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Reorder Point Example
Demand = 8,000 iPhones per year
250 working day year
Lead time for orders is 3 working days, may take 4
Number of working days in a y
y
ear
ROP =
= 8,000 / 250 = 32 units
32 units per day 3days = 96 units
32 units per da 4 days =128 units
=
=
D
d =
d L
- 40. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Production Order Quantity Model
(1 of 5)
1. Used when inventory builds up over a period of time after
an order is placed
2. Used when units are produced and sold simultaneously
Figure 12.6
- 41. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Production Order Quantity Model
(2 of 5)
Q = Number of units per order p = Daily production rate
H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand (usage) rate
t = Length of the production run in days
Annual inventory Holding cost
Average inventory level
holding cost per unit per year
Annual inventory
Maximum inventory level / 2
level
Maximum Total produced duri
=
inventory leve
= ( )
l
×
=
ng Total used during
-
the production run the production run
–
pt dt
- 42. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Production Order Quantity Model
(3 of 5)
Q = Number of units per order p = Daily production rate
H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand (usage) rate
t = Length of the production run in days
s
(Maximum inventory level = Total produced during the production run - Total u e
) ( ) ( d during the production run)
pt dt
However, Q = total produced = pt ; thus t = Q/p
(Maximum inventory level) = = 1
Maximum inventory level
Holding cost = ( ) = 1
2 2
Q Q d
p d Q
p p p
Q d
H H
p
- 43. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Production Order Quantity Model
(4 of 5)
Q = Number of units per order p = Daily production rate
H = Holding cost per unit per year d = Daily demand (usage) rate
t = Length of the production run in days
p
d
HQ
S
D/Q
1
=
cost
Holding
)
(
=
cost
Setup
2
1
2
*
1
1 ( / )
2
2
1 ( / )
2
1 ( / )
p
D
S HQ d p
Q
DS
Q
H d p
DS
Q
H d p
- 44. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Production Order Quantity Example
D = 1,000 units p = 8 units per day
S = $10 d = 4 units per day
H = $0.50 per unit per year
*
*
2
1 ( / )
2(1,000)(10)
0.50 1 (4 / 8)
20,000
80,000
0.50(1/ 2)
282.8 hubcaps, or 283 hubcaps
p
p
DS
Q
H d p
Q
- 45. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Production Order Quantity Model
(5 of 5)
Note:
Number of days the plant is in operatio
1,000
= 4 = =
n 250
D
d
When annual data are used the equation becomes:
2
=
Annual demand rate
1-
Annual production rate
*
p
DS
Q
H
- 46. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Quantity Discount Models (1 of 5)
• Reduced prices are often available when larger quantities
are purchased
• Trade-off is between reduced product cost and increased
holding cost
Table 12.2 A Quantity Discount Schedule
PRICE RANGE QUANTITY ORDERED PRICE PER UNIT P
Initial price 0 to 119 $100
Discount price 1 120 to 1,499 $98
Discount price 2 1,500 and over $96
- 47. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Quantity Discount Models (2 of 5)
Total annual cost = Setup cost + Holding cost + Product cost
PD
IP
Q
S
Q
D
TC
2
where Q = Quantity ordered P = Price per unit
D = Annual demand in units I = Holding cost per unit per year
S = Ordering or setup cost per order expressed as a percent of price P
IP
DS
Q
2
*
Because unit price varies, holding cost is expressed as a
percentage (I) of unit price (P)
- 48. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Quantity Discount Models (3 of 5)
Steps in analyzing a quantity discount
1. Starting with the lowest possible purchase price,
calculate Q* until the first feasible EOQ is found. This is
a possible best order quantity, along with all price-break
quantities for all lower prices.
2. Calculate the total annual cost for each possible order
quantity determined in Step 1. Select the quantity that
gives the lowest total cost.
- 49. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Quantity Discount Models (4 of 5)
Figure 12.7
- 50. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Quantity Discount Models (5 of 5)
Calculate Q* for every discount
starting with the lowest price Q*
=
2DS
IP
2 5,200 $200
$96* 278 /
.28 $96
Q drones order
Infeasible – calculate Q*
for next-higher price
2 5,200 $200
$98* 275 /
.28 $98
Q drones order
Feasible
- 51. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Quantity Discount Example
Table 12.3 Total Cost Computations for Chris Beehner
Electronics
Choose the price and quantity that gives the lowest total cost
Buy 275 drones at $98 per unit
- 52. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Models and Safety
Stock
• Used when demand is not constant or certain
• Use safety stock to achieve a desired service level and
avoid stockouts
ROP d L ss
Annual stockout costs = The sum of the units short for
each demand level × The probability of that demand
level × The stockout cost/unit × The number of
orders per year
- 53. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Safety Stock Example (1 of 2)
ROP = 50 units Stockout cost = $40 per frame
Orders per year = 6 Carrying cost = $5 per frame per year
NUMBER OF UNITS PROBABILITY
30 .2
40 .2
ROP 50 .3
60 .2
70 .1
blank 1.0
- 54. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Safety Stock Example (2 of 2)
ROP = 50 units Stockout cost = $40 per frame
Orders per year = 6 Carrying cost = $5 per frame per year
A safety stock of 20 frames gives the lowest total cost
ROP = 50 + 20 = 70 frames
- 55. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Demand (1 of 3)
Figure 12.8
- 56. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Demand (2 of 3)
Use prescribed service levels to set safety stock when the
cost of stockouts cannot be determined
g
ROP demand durin l m
ead ti e
= + dLT
Z
where Number of standard deviations
Standard deviation of demand during lead time
dLT
Z
- 57. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Demand (3 of 3)
- 58. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Example (1 of 3)
μ = Average demand = 350 kits
σdLT = Standard deviation of demand during lead
time = 10 kits
Stockout policy = 5% (service level = 95%)
Using Appendix I, for an area under the curve of 95%, the
Z = 1.645
Safety stock = ZσdLT = 1.645(10) = 16.5 kits
Reorder point = Expected demand during lead time + Safety stock
= 350 kits + 16.5 kits of safety stock
= 366.5 or 367 kits
- 59. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Other Probabilistic Models (1 of 4)
• When data on demand during lead time are not available,
there are other models available
1. When demand is variable and lead time is constant
2. When lead time is variable and demand is constant
3. When both demand and lead time are variable
- 60. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Other Probabilistic Models (2 of 4)
Demand is variable and lead time is constant
dLT
ROP = daily demand Lead time )
in da s
( y +Z
Average
where = Lead time
= Standard deviation of demand per day
dLT d
d
- 61. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Example (2 of 3)
Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 15
Lead time in days (constant) = 2
Standard deviation of daily demand = 5
Service level = 90%
Z for 90% = 1.28
From Appendix I
ROP 15 units 2 days
30 1.28 5 2
30 9.02 39.02 39
dLT
Z
Safety stock is about 9 computers
- 62. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Other Probabilistic Models (3 of 4)
Lead time is variable and demand is constant
ROP = Daily demand× lead time in days + ×(Daily de
( m ×
) and) LT
Average Z
where Standard deviation of lead time in days
LT
- 63. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Example (3 of 3)
Daily demand (constant) = 10
Average lead time = 6 days
Standard deviation of lead time = σLT = 1
Service level = 98%, so Z (from Appendix I) = 2.055
ROP = 10 units×6 days + 2.055 10 units 1
= 60 + 20.55 = 80.55
Reorder point is about 81 cameras
- 64. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Other Probabilistic Models (4 of 4)
Both demand and lead time are variable
ROP = Average daily demand d
( ×Average lea time +
) LT
Z
where
2
2 2
Standard deviation of demand per day
Standard deviation of lead time in days
(Average lead time Average daily dema d
) n
d
LT
dLT LT
d
- 65. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Probabilistic Example
Average daily demand (normally distributed) = 150
Standard deviation = σd = 16
Average lead time 5 days (normally distributed)
Standard deviation = σLT = 1 day
Service level = 95%, so Z = 1.645 (from Appendix I)
2 2 2
ROP (150 packs 5 days) 1.645
5 days 16 150 1 5 256 22,500 1
1,280 22,500 23,780 154
ROP (150 5) 1.645(154) 750 253 1,003 packs
dLT
dLT
- 66. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Single-Period Model
• Only one order is placed for a product
• Units have little or no value at the end of the sales period
Cost of shortage Sales price/unit – Cost/unit
Cost of overage Cost/unit – Salvage value
s
o
C
C
Service level s
s o
C
C C
- 67. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Single-Period Example (1 of 2)
Average demand = μ = 120 papers/day
Standard deviation = σ = 15 papers
Cs = cost of shortage = $1.25 − $.70 = $.55
Co = cost of overage = $.70 − $.30 = $.40
Service level
.55
.55 .40
.55
.579
.95
s
s o
C
C C
- 68. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Single-Period Example (2 of 2)
From Appendix I, for the area .579, Z ≅ .199
The optimal stocking level
= 120 copies + (.199)(σ)
= 120 + (.199)(15) = 120 + 3 = 123 papers
The stockout risk = 1 − Service level
= 1 − .579 = .421 = 42.1%
- 69. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Fixed-Period (P) Systems (1 of 3)
• Fixed-quantity models require continuous monitoring
using perpetual inventory systems
• In fixed-period systems orders placed at the end of a
fixed period
• Periodic review, P system
- 70. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Fixed-Period (P) Systems (2 of 3)
• Inventory counted only at end of period
• Order brings inventory up to target level
– Only relevant costs are ordering and holding
– Lead times are known and constant
– Items are independent of one another
- 71. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Fixed-Period (P) Systems (3 of 3)
Figure 12.9
- 72. Copyright © 2020, 2017, 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Fixed-Period Systems
• Inventory is only counted at each review period
• May be scheduled at convenient times
• Appropriate in routine situations
• May result in stockouts between periods
• May require increased safety stock