Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to Introduction jjt confcall #34 (extended)
Similar to Introduction jjt confcall #34 (extended) (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Introduction jjt confcall #34 (extended)
- 1. Bridging S1000D and DITA Using XSLT for the bridge Jean-Jacques Thomasson (Capgemini) Lead of the S1000D-DITA bridging initiative p. 1 Open presentation on Monday, June the 15th
- 2. Modules in topics Modules embedded in topics p. 2
- 3. Topics with S1000D headers S1000D header on top of topics in order to manage topics in a CSDB p. 3
- 4. Ability to simply include/remove particular blocs of elements or attributes Hotspot arising errors because the corresponding domain is not activated p. 4
- 5. Ability to simply include/remove particular blocs of elements or attributes <hotspot> domain is not “activated” p. 5
- 6. Ability to simply include/remove particular blocs of elements or attributes When hospot domain is activated… p. 6
- 7. Ability to simply include/remove particular blocs of elements or attributes <Hotspot> elements arise no more error p. 7
- 8. p. 8 Ability to use business specific vocabularies xTEDS XML Electronic Transducer Data Sheet A bloc of data conforming to xETDS std : Electronic Transducers Data Sheet
- 9. Ability to use business specific vocabularies xTEDS XML Electronic Transducer Data Sheet Or could also be a <KML> vocabulary for positioning some info on a map (GIS) p. 9
- 10. How was it designed ? Behind the scene p. 10
- 11. p. 11 Behind the scene xs:include xs:include xs:include xs:include xs:redefine Assembly Business logic Semantics Core structures A new meta-model controlled by a UML representation: Made of 4 packages of schemas
- 12. p. 12 Behind the scene xs:include xs:include xs:include xs:include xs:redefine S1000D as it is today Powered by UML
- 13. p. 13 Behind the scene xs:include xs:include xs:include xs:include xs:redefine S1000D as proposed Powered by UML
- 14. p. 14 Behind the scene Powered by UML Each package is organized like is, today, the S1000D S1000D as it is today
- 15. p. 15 Behind the scene S1000D as proposed (here bridged with DITA)
- 16. Behind the scene CRTT packages DITA package Core package Domains packages A flexible physical representation CRTTCRTT S1000D p. 16
- 17. Who are we ? Activity and a brief history p. 17
- 18. p. 18 Eric Pageron (Thales) head of XSLT sub working group Nathalie Szmulewicz (Thales) Hervé Chapotin (Thales) David Blandineau (Alstom Transport) S S S S Who are we ? The S1000D and DITA volunteers – France – The group was initially a task team of S1000D+ France. Jean-Jacques Thomasson (Euriware) Michel Doméon (TechPub manager at Dassault-Aviation) Philippe Zingoni (Sales support manager at Antéa) S N N Jean-Luc Borie (CEO of Componize) Mohamed Zergaoui (W3C, XML Prague & ISO SC 34) Alberto Franzetti (CEO at Antea)S N D
- 19. p. 19 Canada Nicolas Dupuy (S1000D senior consultant at PTC) Normand Montour (CGI) The Netherlands David A. Reid (Thales NL) S S D S D D D D …and 154 followers on LinkedIn Who are we ? The S1000D and DITA volunteers
- 20. Working Group - activity ► Started in 2011, with the goal of making interoperability between these 2 major documentation standards ► Monthly meetings (confcall) to manage the project Reports are accessible on GIFAS Website ► Technical studies and proofs of concept A library of 26 Proofs of concepts • POC #6 shows valid S1000D publication and DITA maps mixing topics and DMs • POC #19 shows restrictions on a <p> element • POC #20 shows incorporation of new vocabularies with namespaces • … Free of access on the GIFAS website for supporter of the initiative Proposed models are public domain, NO Intellectual Property ► Style sheets (XSLT) working group p. 20p. 20
- 21. Working Group - activity ► Presentations DITA TC (31st of July, 2012) S1000D EPWG and SC (September 2012) XML Prague (February 2013) S1000D User Forum (September 2013) EPWG beginning of April, 2014 DITA Europe late 2014 DITA North America 2015 • Joe Storbeck • Keith Roberts ► Plus some additional public presentations through webconfs ► On April 10th 2015, an official CPF (Change proposal Form) is filed at the ASD/S1000D Steering Committee p. 21
- 22. 2005-2006 2009-2010 2011 2012 2013 2015 proposal for a new meta model for S1000D Accepted and applied since S1000D Issue 3.0 A one year long study is run for having valid schemas for DITA A solution is found, based on the S1000D meta-model Creation of the French S1000D-DITA working group The model is stressed through miscellaneous proofs of concepts An XML model for having mixed publications S1000D/DITA is established The proposed new model is opened to any new XML vocabularies Domains are implemented in S1000D XSLT sub-working group is created A brief history p. 22 2014 A CPF is filed
- 23. Thank you for your attention p. 23
Editor's Notes
- Dear attendees Look at the « s » at standards and bottom of this first page is written « DITA and other standards ». No, not the “s” of S1000D. This is because we are going to make a journey outside the actual boarders of actual S1000D. But still, the good news is that “s” is also the leading letter of S1000D. This presentation is about the initiative of our small team working on the subject of embedded software and hardware. We focus on finding out which XML standard CAN, MUST or SHOULD be used for documentation purpose. If DITA is one at the top of the list, it is not the sole one and we will see that this subject covers in reality different concerns. The compatibility of S1000D and DITA is not new. In last June, David Reid did a presentation at Congilty about documenting software with S1000D used in a DITA manner. In 2011, Jo Gollner from Stilo presented at the XML Summer School his idea of cross-linking DITA topics and S1000D modules. Older papers and presentations can be found on the web in which S1000D and DITA are compared, discussed, evaluated and so on. In 2007 the subject was discussed in an OASIS newsgroup. It was also presented many times within S1000D meetings, in particular in 2007 during the User Forum of Melbourne (by Jo Gollner, again). So, what is new is that our initiative is based on real XML Schemas which make the bridge between the two standards. In other words, their schemas have been made compatible. Beyond that first step, we study the possibility to use additional XML standards.
- Here for example, you see a DITA topic containing two modules: one within a sub topic of type “concept” and the second one directly within the topic.
- Here for example, you see a DITA topic containing two modules: one within a sub topic of type “concept” and the second one directly within the topic.
- Here for example, you see a DITA topic containing two modules: one within a sub topic of type “concept” and the second one directly within the topic.
- Here for example, you see a DITA topic containing two modules: one within a sub topic of type “concept” and the second one directly within the topic.
- Here for example, you see a DITA topic containing two modules: one within a sub topic of type “concept” and the second one directly within the topic.
- Here for example, you see a DITA topic containing two modules: one within a sub topic of type “concept” and the second one directly within the topic.
- It is also possible to add new elements either from the same namespace as DITA or from other namespaces. Here we see elements from the IEEE xETDS standard whose purpose is to represent the data sheets of electronic transducers. When adding such new vocabularies, you need of course to also add the corresponding style sheets and behavior into your application but this is also a subject we look at.
- It is also possible to add new elements either from the same namespace as DITA or from other namespaces. Here we see elements from the IEEE xETDS standard whose purpose is to represent the data sheets of electronic transducers. When adding such new vocabularies, you need of course to also add the corresponding style sheets and behavior into your application but this is also a subject we look at.
- How we work We founded the team at automn 2011 just after the primary super model was found. We have confcall once per month. We meet twice a year during the meeting of the French S1000D users’ group. 20 proof of concepts have been since 2011 on different technical issues. Our work is opened and we communicate on it: We report the progress to the French S1000D users’ group. A presentation was done to the members of the DITA Technical Committee on 31st of July 2012. The EPWG and SC have been informed in September 2012. A poster was made at XML Prague this last February. Last June, we sent a note to the members of the DITA TC to spot the subject.
- Thanks for your attention. Last, I want to mention that Interested people are invited to discuss with us and can join our “think tank”.