Canada, the Kingdom of Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland jointly institute proceedings against the Islamic Republic of Iran
The General Assembly is the principal organ of the United Nations, consisting of all UN member states, with each member having a maximum of five representatives. It currently has 193 members. The General Assembly has powers including electing non-permanent Security Council members and other UN bodies, approving the budget, and initiating studies on international issues. It can make recommendations and declarations on international matters, but its resolutions are not binding. Voting is based on the principle of one member, one vote, with decisions requiring a two-thirds majority.
international court of jurisdiction-its composition,types of jurisdiction,activities,cases,contentious and advisory jurisdiction,corfu channel case and nuclear weapon case
The United Nations Security Council has primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security. It has 15 members, including 5 permanent members (China, France, Russia, UK, US) and 10 non-permanent members elected for 2-year terms. Decisions require 9 votes with no veto from a permanent member. The Council has broad powers to investigate disputes, recommend dispute resolution, authorize use of force, impose sanctions, and establish international tribunals. It works to resolve conflicts through peaceful means such as mediation, peacekeeping forces, and sanctions before authorizing military action.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It settles legal disputes submitted to it by states and gives advisory opinions on legal questions referred by UN organs. The ICJ is composed of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. It handles two types of cases - contentious cases between states, and advisory proceedings on legal questions referred by UN bodies.
Sources of International Law for 3rd year students-2013Chathurika86
This document discusses the sources of international law as outlined in Article 38 of the ICJ Statute. It identifies the four main sources as international conventions, international customs, general principles of law, and judicial decisions and writings of publicists. Customary international law is considered a dynamic source and requires two elements - state practice and opinio juris. For a custom to form, state practice must be extensive and virtually uniform among states over a period of time. Judicial decisions provide verification of alleged customary rules.
The League of Nations was formed in January 1920 after World War 1 to promote international cooperation and preserve peace. It held its first meeting in a Swiss hotel in 1919 with diplomats from over 32 countries. The idea of an international organization to avoid war had been proposed as early as 1905, but it was not until after the massive destruction of WW1 that world leaders seriously considered establishing such a body. The League's headquarters was located in Geneva, Switzerland.
The General Assembly of United Nation. It is related to subject of Political Science. And related to the legal field. Written by SONAM HASSIM, 4th year student of B.A.LL.B(H).
What is international dispute? What are the various ways of settling the international dispute? Explain Pacific means of settling the dispute. Explain the coercive method of solving the dispute. In this ppt we deal with all these question that will be helpful for law exams.
The General Assembly is the principal organ of the United Nations, consisting of all UN member states, with each member having a maximum of five representatives. It currently has 193 members. The General Assembly has powers including electing non-permanent Security Council members and other UN bodies, approving the budget, and initiating studies on international issues. It can make recommendations and declarations on international matters, but its resolutions are not binding. Voting is based on the principle of one member, one vote, with decisions requiring a two-thirds majority.
international court of jurisdiction-its composition,types of jurisdiction,activities,cases,contentious and advisory jurisdiction,corfu channel case and nuclear weapon case
The United Nations Security Council has primary responsibility for maintaining international peace and security. It has 15 members, including 5 permanent members (China, France, Russia, UK, US) and 10 non-permanent members elected for 2-year terms. Decisions require 9 votes with no veto from a permanent member. The Council has broad powers to investigate disputes, recommend dispute resolution, authorize use of force, impose sanctions, and establish international tribunals. It works to resolve conflicts through peaceful means such as mediation, peacekeeping forces, and sanctions before authorizing military action.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It settles legal disputes submitted to it by states and gives advisory opinions on legal questions referred by UN organs. The ICJ is composed of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. It handles two types of cases - contentious cases between states, and advisory proceedings on legal questions referred by UN bodies.
Sources of International Law for 3rd year students-2013Chathurika86
This document discusses the sources of international law as outlined in Article 38 of the ICJ Statute. It identifies the four main sources as international conventions, international customs, general principles of law, and judicial decisions and writings of publicists. Customary international law is considered a dynamic source and requires two elements - state practice and opinio juris. For a custom to form, state practice must be extensive and virtually uniform among states over a period of time. Judicial decisions provide verification of alleged customary rules.
The League of Nations was formed in January 1920 after World War 1 to promote international cooperation and preserve peace. It held its first meeting in a Swiss hotel in 1919 with diplomats from over 32 countries. The idea of an international organization to avoid war had been proposed as early as 1905, but it was not until after the massive destruction of WW1 that world leaders seriously considered establishing such a body. The League's headquarters was located in Geneva, Switzerland.
The General Assembly of United Nation. It is related to subject of Political Science. And related to the legal field. Written by SONAM HASSIM, 4th year student of B.A.LL.B(H).
What is international dispute? What are the various ways of settling the international dispute? Explain Pacific means of settling the dispute. Explain the coercive method of solving the dispute. In this ppt we deal with all these question that will be helpful for law exams.
Genocide and crime against humanity finalPalak Agrawal
This document discusses genocide and crimes against humanity. It defines genocide as mass killing intended to destroy a group as defined by the perpetrator. The UN defines genocide as killing, harming, inflicting conditions to destroy a group, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children. Genocide requires intent to destroy a group in whole or part. Examples discussed include the Armenian genocide and decisions from international criminal tribunals related to Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia. Crimes against humanity include murder, genocide, slavery, torture, rape and apartheid.
This document discusses the history and process of codifying international law. It outlines key events and efforts over time to systematically organize international legal rules and principles into written codes and agreements. Some of the major developments mentioned include the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907 which resulted in the first international conventions, the work of the League of Nations and United Nations to further codification, and important conventions on topics like the law of the sea, diplomatic relations, and treaties. Both benefits and challenges of the codification process are also reviewed.
The document discusses the definitions and sources of international humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the laws of war. It explains that IHL aims to limit suffering and protect civilians during armed conflicts by establishing rules for combatants and military objectives. The main sources of IHL are lawmaking treaties like the Geneva and Hague Conventions, as well as customary international law. The document outlines the key purposes and applicability of IHL, and consequences for violating its provisions.
Introduction to the work of the Security Council from the Security Council Practices and Charter Research Branch, Security Council Affairs Division, Department of Political Affairs, United Nations. Presentation given in August 2012.
International humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) both aim to protect individuals in armed conflict and civil unrest. IHL regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and reducing suffering. It protects civilians and those no longer taking part in hostilities. IHRL establishes rules for governments in their treatment of individuals during peacetime and conflict, though some rights can be derogated during emergencies. Both bodies of law place duties on states and non-state actors, and establish international mechanisms to support implementation and enforcement.
The International Court of Justice has 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council who serve 9-year terms. It has both contentious and advisory jurisdictions. Contentious jurisdiction involves deciding cases between states that consent to the Court's authority, including voluntary, ad hoc, or compulsory types of consent-based jurisdiction. Advisory jurisdiction allows the Court to provide non-binding advisory opinions on legal issues when requested by authorized international bodies.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) settles legal disputes submitted by states and provides advisory opinions to UN bodies. It is composed of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. The ICJ has jurisdiction over cases between states if they have accepted its jurisdiction, usually by special agreement, treaty clause, or unilateral declaration. States may make reservations to limit the ICJ's jurisdiction over certain disputes like those solely within domestic jurisdiction. The ICJ lacks jurisdiction if states have not consented to its authority and can raise preliminary objections to the admissibility of a case.
The document discusses the sources of international law that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) applies in deciding disputes. There are five main sources according to Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute: 1) international conventions and treaties, 2) international customs, 3) general principles of law, 4) judicial decisions and writings of publicists, and 5) reason and equity. Treaties can be either law-making or contractual. Customary international law requires consistent state practice and opinio juris. General principles fill gaps where no treaty or custom applies. Judicial decisions and writings are subsidiary sources. The ICJ can decide cases ex aequo et bono if parties agree.
Role of icj in solving internation disputegagan deep
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) helps resolve international disputes through binding judgments. It is the primary judicial branch of the United Nations, composed of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. Only states can bring cases to the ICJ, and its jurisdiction is based on state consent. One example is the 1986 case of Nicaragua v. United States, where the ICJ ruled the US violated international law by supporting Contra rebels against Nicaragua's government. While the decision was binding, the US refused to participate and blocked its enforcement, showing the limited power of the ICJ without state cooperation.
This document provides an outline and objectives for analyzing key concepts relating to international humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL). It discusses the interlinkages between public international law, international human rights law, IHL, and ICL. The document outlines the history and emergence of IHL and ICL, their key legal instruments and sources. It analyzes the application of ICL and categories of international crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The connection between IHL and ICL is also discussed, particularly how violations of IHL can constitute war crimes under ICL.
What is intervention and when it is permitted under international lawDavid Vishnoi
Intervention is defined as dictatorial interference by one state in the affairs of another state. It generally violates the principle of non-intervention, but international law allows for exceptions including self-defense and collective actions authorized by the UN Security Council. Intervention can involve force (military intervention) or influence without force (diplomatic intervention). Historically other grounds were used to justify intervention such as humanitarianism or enforcing treaty rights, but the UN Charter now prohibits all uses of force or threats of force by states against other states.
This document discusses the sources of international law. It identifies the main sources as treaties, international customs, general principles of law, judicial decisions, and scholarly writings. It examines each source in more detail, including how treaties can become customary international law over time through widespread acceptance and practice. The Statute of the International Court of Justice is also discussed as recognizing these sources of international law. There is no definitive hierarchy between sources, but treaties and customs are generally considered primary sources, along with general principles of law.
International humanitarian law (IHL) applies during armed conflicts and prohibits acts aimed at terrorizing civilians. Even when IHL does not apply, fundamental human rights and humanitarian laws cannot be violated. States must ensure counterterrorism measures comply with international law. The use of force in self-defense is permitted under Article 51 of the UN Charter in response to an armed attack, but the response must be necessary, proportional, and avoid further escalation when possible.
Understanding Diplomatic Privileges and ImmunitiesKai Bruns
Campus talk @Middlesex University in Dubai
An internal US inspection report released this summer criticized the US ambassador to the UAE, HE Michael Corbin, for misusing parts of his diplomatic privileges. Not only in the UAE the granting of diplomatic privileges and immunities is a controversially debated topic. In the public eye diplomats seem to enjoy traditional prerogatives enabling them to float above the law. In the light of abuses of diplomatic immunities such as parking, speeding or even more serious crimes such as drug and people trafficking the upcoming Monday night speaker lecture will raise the question why states grant diplomatic immunities.
In order to create a basic understanding the lecture will analyze the historical evolution of legal doctrines underlying the concession of diplomatic privileges and immunities. Diplomatic law governing the inviolability of permanent mission premises and immunities of their staff are regulated in the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR). We will look at the codification history of the VCDR and discuss cases of abuses of diplomatic immunities in order to get a feel for the link between legal theory and diplomatic practice to deepen our understanding of the benefits of such long-standing diplomatic practice.
Source of International Law. Detail of the source of International law. It is very important for those students who are preparing for Law exams, or who studying the law. It is also very important for Semester exams.
The International Court of Justice will hold public hearings on March 7-8, 2022 regarding Ukraine's request for provisional measures in its case against Russia alleging violations of the Genocide Convention. The hearings will consider Ukraine's request that Russia halt military operations and take other steps to prevent further harm. Representatives of Ukraine and Russia will present oral arguments at the hybrid in-person/virtual hearings, which will be streamed online. If provisional measures are ordered, the court could demand Russia cease military actions against Ukraine as the broader case on genocide is adjudicated.
Comunicado oficial de La Haya sobre los nuevos plazos del juicio.Jesús Alanoca
The International Court of Justice authorized Bolivia to submit a Reply and Chile to submit a Rejoinder in their case concerning Bolivia's obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean. The Court fixed deadlines of March 21, 2017 for Bolivia's Reply and September 21, 2017 for Chile's Rejoinder. The Court made its decision after agreeing with both parties on the subsequent procedure and timeline.
Genocide and crime against humanity finalPalak Agrawal
This document discusses genocide and crimes against humanity. It defines genocide as mass killing intended to destroy a group as defined by the perpetrator. The UN defines genocide as killing, harming, inflicting conditions to destroy a group, preventing births, or forcibly transferring children. Genocide requires intent to destroy a group in whole or part. Examples discussed include the Armenian genocide and decisions from international criminal tribunals related to Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia. Crimes against humanity include murder, genocide, slavery, torture, rape and apartheid.
This document discusses the history and process of codifying international law. It outlines key events and efforts over time to systematically organize international legal rules and principles into written codes and agreements. Some of the major developments mentioned include the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907 which resulted in the first international conventions, the work of the League of Nations and United Nations to further codification, and important conventions on topics like the law of the sea, diplomatic relations, and treaties. Both benefits and challenges of the codification process are also reviewed.
The document discusses the definitions and sources of international humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the laws of war. It explains that IHL aims to limit suffering and protect civilians during armed conflicts by establishing rules for combatants and military objectives. The main sources of IHL are lawmaking treaties like the Geneva and Hague Conventions, as well as customary international law. The document outlines the key purposes and applicability of IHL, and consequences for violating its provisions.
Introduction to the work of the Security Council from the Security Council Practices and Charter Research Branch, Security Council Affairs Division, Department of Political Affairs, United Nations. Presentation given in August 2012.
International humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL) both aim to protect individuals in armed conflict and civil unrest. IHL regulates armed conflict by limiting means and methods of warfare and reducing suffering. It protects civilians and those no longer taking part in hostilities. IHRL establishes rules for governments in their treatment of individuals during peacetime and conflict, though some rights can be derogated during emergencies. Both bodies of law place duties on states and non-state actors, and establish international mechanisms to support implementation and enforcement.
The International Court of Justice has 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council who serve 9-year terms. It has both contentious and advisory jurisdictions. Contentious jurisdiction involves deciding cases between states that consent to the Court's authority, including voluntary, ad hoc, or compulsory types of consent-based jurisdiction. Advisory jurisdiction allows the Court to provide non-binding advisory opinions on legal issues when requested by authorized international bodies.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) settles legal disputes submitted by states and provides advisory opinions to UN bodies. It is composed of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. The ICJ has jurisdiction over cases between states if they have accepted its jurisdiction, usually by special agreement, treaty clause, or unilateral declaration. States may make reservations to limit the ICJ's jurisdiction over certain disputes like those solely within domestic jurisdiction. The ICJ lacks jurisdiction if states have not consented to its authority and can raise preliminary objections to the admissibility of a case.
The document discusses the sources of international law that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) applies in deciding disputes. There are five main sources according to Article 38(1) of the ICJ Statute: 1) international conventions and treaties, 2) international customs, 3) general principles of law, 4) judicial decisions and writings of publicists, and 5) reason and equity. Treaties can be either law-making or contractual. Customary international law requires consistent state practice and opinio juris. General principles fill gaps where no treaty or custom applies. Judicial decisions and writings are subsidiary sources. The ICJ can decide cases ex aequo et bono if parties agree.
Role of icj in solving internation disputegagan deep
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) helps resolve international disputes through binding judgments. It is the primary judicial branch of the United Nations, composed of 15 judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council. Only states can bring cases to the ICJ, and its jurisdiction is based on state consent. One example is the 1986 case of Nicaragua v. United States, where the ICJ ruled the US violated international law by supporting Contra rebels against Nicaragua's government. While the decision was binding, the US refused to participate and blocked its enforcement, showing the limited power of the ICJ without state cooperation.
This document provides an outline and objectives for analyzing key concepts relating to international humanitarian law (IHL) and international criminal law (ICL). It discusses the interlinkages between public international law, international human rights law, IHL, and ICL. The document outlines the history and emergence of IHL and ICL, their key legal instruments and sources. It analyzes the application of ICL and categories of international crimes such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. The connection between IHL and ICL is also discussed, particularly how violations of IHL can constitute war crimes under ICL.
What is intervention and when it is permitted under international lawDavid Vishnoi
Intervention is defined as dictatorial interference by one state in the affairs of another state. It generally violates the principle of non-intervention, but international law allows for exceptions including self-defense and collective actions authorized by the UN Security Council. Intervention can involve force (military intervention) or influence without force (diplomatic intervention). Historically other grounds were used to justify intervention such as humanitarianism or enforcing treaty rights, but the UN Charter now prohibits all uses of force or threats of force by states against other states.
This document discusses the sources of international law. It identifies the main sources as treaties, international customs, general principles of law, judicial decisions, and scholarly writings. It examines each source in more detail, including how treaties can become customary international law over time through widespread acceptance and practice. The Statute of the International Court of Justice is also discussed as recognizing these sources of international law. There is no definitive hierarchy between sources, but treaties and customs are generally considered primary sources, along with general principles of law.
International humanitarian law (IHL) applies during armed conflicts and prohibits acts aimed at terrorizing civilians. Even when IHL does not apply, fundamental human rights and humanitarian laws cannot be violated. States must ensure counterterrorism measures comply with international law. The use of force in self-defense is permitted under Article 51 of the UN Charter in response to an armed attack, but the response must be necessary, proportional, and avoid further escalation when possible.
Understanding Diplomatic Privileges and ImmunitiesKai Bruns
Campus talk @Middlesex University in Dubai
An internal US inspection report released this summer criticized the US ambassador to the UAE, HE Michael Corbin, for misusing parts of his diplomatic privileges. Not only in the UAE the granting of diplomatic privileges and immunities is a controversially debated topic. In the public eye diplomats seem to enjoy traditional prerogatives enabling them to float above the law. In the light of abuses of diplomatic immunities such as parking, speeding or even more serious crimes such as drug and people trafficking the upcoming Monday night speaker lecture will raise the question why states grant diplomatic immunities.
In order to create a basic understanding the lecture will analyze the historical evolution of legal doctrines underlying the concession of diplomatic privileges and immunities. Diplomatic law governing the inviolability of permanent mission premises and immunities of their staff are regulated in the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR). We will look at the codification history of the VCDR and discuss cases of abuses of diplomatic immunities in order to get a feel for the link between legal theory and diplomatic practice to deepen our understanding of the benefits of such long-standing diplomatic practice.
Source of International Law. Detail of the source of International law. It is very important for those students who are preparing for Law exams, or who studying the law. It is also very important for Semester exams.
The International Court of Justice will hold public hearings on March 7-8, 2022 regarding Ukraine's request for provisional measures in its case against Russia alleging violations of the Genocide Convention. The hearings will consider Ukraine's request that Russia halt military operations and take other steps to prevent further harm. Representatives of Ukraine and Russia will present oral arguments at the hybrid in-person/virtual hearings, which will be streamed online. If provisional measures are ordered, the court could demand Russia cease military actions against Ukraine as the broader case on genocide is adjudicated.
Comunicado oficial de La Haya sobre los nuevos plazos del juicio.Jesús Alanoca
The International Court of Justice authorized Bolivia to submit a Reply and Chile to submit a Rejoinder in their case concerning Bolivia's obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean. The Court fixed deadlines of March 21, 2017 for Bolivia's Reply and September 21, 2017 for Chile's Rejoinder. The Court made its decision after agreeing with both parties on the subsequent procedure and timeline.
The International Court of Justice:
(1) Found that Russia must refrain from imposing limitations on the Crimean Tatar community's ability to conserve its representative institutions like the Mejlis.
(2) Ruled unanimously that Russia must ensure the availability of education in the Ukrainian language in Crimea.
(3) Ordered that both Ukraine and Russia refrain from any actions that could aggravate the dispute or make it more difficult to resolve.
The International Court of Justice fixed 25 July 2016 as the deadline for Chile to file a counter-memorial in response to Bolivia's application concerning negotiations over access to the Pacific Ocean. This follows the ICJ's judgment that it has jurisdiction under the Pact of Bogota to hear Bolivia's case. The subsequent court procedures will be determined at a later date.
The International Court of Justice fixed 25 July 2016 as the deadline for Chile to file a counter-memorial in response to Bolivia's application concerning negotiations over access to the Pacific Ocean. This follows the ICJ's judgment that it has jurisdiction under the Pact of Bogota to hear Bolivia's case. The subsequent court procedure will be determined later.
The International Court of Justice fixed time limits for the filing of initial pleadings in the case concerning Bolivia's obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean brought by Bolivia against Chile. The Court set April 17, 2014 as the time limit for Bolivia to file a Memorial and February 18, 2015 for Chile to file a Counter-Memorial. This was done in accordance with the agreement between the parties, and the subsequent court procedure will be decided later.
This document provides an overview of the jurisdiction and admissibility of the International Criminal Court as outlined in the Rome Statute. It discusses the four forms of jurisdiction the ICC possesses: temporal, personal, territorial, and subject-matter. Temporal jurisdiction refers to the time period of committed crimes. Personal jurisdiction involves which individuals can be prosecuted. Territorial jurisdiction covers which locations the ICC can exercise its powers. Subject-matter jurisdiction outlines the four international crimes the ICC can prosecute: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crime of aggression. The document also examines the principles of complementarity and ne bis in idem regarding admissibility of cases.
This document summarizes the applicable law in international arbitration. It discusses that there are three aspects of applicable law: 1) the law governing the arbitration agreement, 2) the law governing arbitration procedures, and 3) the law governing the merits of the case. For arbitration agreements, principles of private international law or the conflict of laws rules of the national law typically apply. For procedures, the law of the seat of arbitration usually applies. For the merits, the proper law of the contract or the law with the closest relationship to the contract typically applies, respecting party autonomy when present. The document outlines practices and cases from various countries to illustrate the application of these principles.
ALL ABOUT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ) AND MYANMARMYO AUNG Myanmar
ALL ABOUT INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ) AND MYANMAR
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). It was established in June 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations and began work in April 1946.
The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). Of the six principal organs of the United Nations, it is the only one not located in New York (United States of America).
The Court’s role is to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes submitted to it by States and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.
The Court is composed of 15 judges, who are elected for terms of office of nine years by the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council. It is assisted by a Registry, its administrative organ. Its official languages are English and French.
https://www.icj-cij.org/en/court
https://www.icj-cij.org/en-basic-toolkit
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ICJ
Information Department
information@icj-cij.org
https://opiniojuris.org/2019/11/13/the-gambia-v-myanmar-at-the-international-court-of-justice-points-of-interest-in-the-application/
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/cases-brought-myanmar-deliver-justice-rohingya-191117174800430.html
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/14/war-crimes-judges-approve-investigation-violence-against-rohingya-icc-myammar
https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-situation-of-the-rohingya-is-there-a-role-for-the-international-court-of-justice/
https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/gambia-files-lawsuit-against-myanmar-international-court-justice
The document discusses various international courts and their jurisdictions, which include hearing cases on international crimes, trade disputes, human rights issues, and territorial disputes. It provides an overview of different international courts and their memberships, as well as statistics on the number of cases they have reviewed. Examples of international economic courts from Europe, Latin America, Africa, and those with global scope are also outlined.
The Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the arbitration between Ukraine and the Russian Federation over the detention of Ukrainian naval vessels and servicemen has decided to hear Russia's Preliminary Objections to jurisdiction in a preliminary phase. Russia contends the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction for five reasons, including that the dispute concerns military activities excluded from jurisdiction and that Ukraine did not pursue negotiations. Ukraine requested the objections be joined to the merits instead of a preliminary phase. However, the Tribunal concluded the objections appear to justify examination in a preliminary phase.
Informe de la Corte Internacional de JusticiaOxígeno Bolivia
Bolivia has instituted proceedings against Chile before the International Court of Justice concerning a dispute over Chile's obligation to negotiate in good faith to grant Bolivia sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. Bolivia asserts that Chile has committed through agreements and declarations to negotiate access for Bolivia. However, Chile has not complied with this obligation and denies its existence. Bolivia requests that the Court declare that Chile has an obligation to negotiate in good faith to grant Bolivia access, that Chile has breached this obligation, and that Chile must now perform this obligation promptly and effectively. The basis for the Court's jurisdiction is that both states are parties to the Pact of Bogota which recognizes the Court's compulsory jurisdiction in disputes concerning treaty interpretation and
Comunicado de prensa sobre la presentación demanda marítima en La Haya Fabiola Altamirano
Bolivia has instituted proceedings against Chile before the International Court of Justice concerning a dispute over Chile's obligation to negotiate in good faith to grant Bolivia sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. Bolivia asserts that Chile has committed through agreements and declarations to negotiate access for Bolivia, but has not complied with this obligation and denies it exists. Bolivia requests that the Court declare Chile has an obligation to negotiate in good faith to grant Bolivia access, that Chile has breached this obligation, and that Chile must perform this obligation promptly and effectively to grant Bolivia sovereign access to the Pacific Ocean. The basis for the Court's jurisdiction is that both states are parties to the Pact of Bogota which recognizes the Court's compulsory jurisdiction
This white paper discusses legal remedies for victims and states in the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 over Eastern Ukraine in 2014. It analyzes potential cases before (1) the International Court of Justice to establish state responsibility, (2) the European Court of Human Rights to address human rights violations, and (3) the International Criminal Court or domestic courts to criminally prosecute individuals. Civil litigation options are also examined seeking compensation from Ukraine, the airlines, or Malaysia. The paper aims to help victims' families and governments pursue legal accountability and justice, though it will be a challenging and lengthy process.
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) AND MYANMAR-BANGLADESHMYO AUNG Myanmar
The International Criminal Court (ICC) investigates and, where warranted, tries individuals charged with the gravest crimes of concern to the international community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression.
The Court is participating in a global fight to end impunity, and through international criminal justice, the Court aims to hold those responsible accountable for their crimes and to help prevent these crimes from happening again.
The Court cannot reach these goals alone. As a court of last resort, it seeks to complement, not replace, national Courts. Governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, the ICC is the world’s first permanent international criminal court.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/rohingya-myanmar
Preliminary examination Bangladesh/Myanmar(ONGOING)
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=180918-otp-stat-Rohingya
Related Documents
18 September 2018
Statement of ICC Prosecutor, Mrs Fatou Bensouda, on opening a Preliminary Examination concerning the alleged deportation of the Rohingya people from Myanmar to Bangladesh
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBDakDv9s2o&feature=youtu.be
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mszr5ktqh7a8ta0/Statement_of_ICC_Prosecutor_on_opening_a_Preliminary_Examination_concerning_the_Rohingya.mp4?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/xjfulzz77bl3nf5/Statement_of_ICC_Prosecutor_on_opening_a_Preliminary_Examination_concerning_the_Rohingya.mp3?dl=0
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-1
https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2018_02057.PDF
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-36
Notice of the Public Statement Issued by the Government of Myanmar
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-36
17 August 2018 | Office of the Prosecutor | Notice
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-28
Decision Inviting the Competent Authorities of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar to Submit Observations pursuant to Rule 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence on the “Prosecution’s Request for a Ruling on Jurisdiction under Article 19(3) o
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-28
21 June 2018 | Pre-Trial Chamber I | Decision
https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-31
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE...Pravotv
This document provides a joint opinion from the Venice Commission and ODIHR on Ukraine's draft law on national referendums. The summary addresses key points:
1) The draft law aims to regulate national referendums in Ukraine and fill a legal gap that has existed since 2018.
2) The draft law represents progress compared to previous laws but could still be improved in areas like clarifying types of referendums, ensuring equal campaign opportunities, and regulating electronic voting and campaign finance.
3) The Venice Commission and ODIHR welcome Ukraine's efforts to bring its referendum legislation in line with international standards but recommend addressing some outstanding issues in the draft law.
European Court of Human Rights: Judgment Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and ...Energy for One World
The European Court of Human Rights found Switzerland in violation of its obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights to protect citizens from climate change. The Court ruled that Article 8, the right to respect for private and family life, includes protection from serious adverse effects of climate change. However, it found the individual applicants did not have standing, while the applicant association representing over 2,000 older women did have standing. The Court also found Switzerland violated Article 6 by failing to properly consider the association's complaints in domestic courts. Overall, Switzerland failed to implement sufficient legislation and measures to meet its climate change targets in line with its international commitments.
The Henley Passport Index ranks all world passports according to the number of destinations their holders can access without a prior visa. The 2024 ranking lists Japan as having the most powerful passport, with access to 194 destinations visa-free. France, Germany, Singapore, and South Korea share the second place ranking with access to 193 destinations. Afghanistan has the least powerful passport, providing visa-free access to only 28 destinations. The index provides the most extensive data on global passport power and mobility over 18 years and is regularly updated.
Проект Закону про внесення змін до Закону України "Про освіту" щодо запровадж...dynamo777
Метою даного законопроєкту є запровадження правового регулювання
відносин у сфері езотеричної освіти, сприяння захисту прав та інтересів всіх
учасників зазначених відносин, визначення базових правил ведення
діяльності у сфері езотеричної освіти та забезпечення дотримання вимог
законодавства України.
Запровадження спеціального режиму оподаткування доходів, отриманих фізичними ...dynamo777
Проект Закону про внесення змін до Податкового кодексу України та деяких інших законодавчих актів України щодо запровадження спеціального режиму оподаткування доходів, отриманих фізичними особами від здійснення окремих видів діяльності
ПОЯСНЮВАЛЬНА ЗАПИСКА
до проекту Закону України «Про внесення змін до Кримінального кодексу
України щодо забезпечення свободи від втручання в приватне життя
людини»
Проект Закону про внесення змін до деяких законів України про визначення порядку подання декларацій осіб, уповноважених на виконання функцій держави або місцевого самоврядування, в умовах воєнного стану
Global Trends in Forced Displacement 2022dynamo777
UNHCR's Global Trends report presents key statistical trends and the latest official statistics on refugees, asylum-seekers, internally displaced and stateless people worldwide
Постановление Правительства Российской Федерации от 30.05.2023 № 873dynamo777
"Об особенностях применения на территориях Донецкой Народной Республики, Луганской Народной Республики, Запорожской области и Херсонской области положений законодательства Российской Федерации в сферах промышленной безопасности опасных производственных объектов и обеспечения безопасности гидротехнических сооружений"
The document summarizes discussions from the 2023 G7 Foreign Ministers' Meeting in Japan. Key topics included:
- Strong condemnation of Russia's war in Ukraine and support for Ukraine's sovereignty.
- Concerns about China's actions in the South China Sea, repression in Hong Kong, and human rights issues.
- Criticism of North Korea's missile tests and call for denuclearization.
- Alarm about political and humanitarian situations in Afghanistan, Myanmar, and Iran.
- Support for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine.
Міноборони змінило договори із забезпечення військових харчуваннямdynamo777
20 лютого 2023 року були внесені зміни до 8 (восьми) договорів, відповідно до яких зменшено термін дій угод і, відповідно, внесені зміни до вартості послуги з організації харчування та ціни в каталозі продукції (Додаток 13.1.).
Russia’s Systematic Program for the Re-education and Adoption of Ukraine's Ch...dynamo777
Russia’s federal government has systematically relocated at least 6,000 children from Ukraine to a network of re-education and adoption facilities in Russia-occupied Crimea and mainland Russia.
WORLD ECONOMIC OUTLOOK INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND UPDATEdynamo777
Global economic growth is projected to slow from 3.4% in 2022 to 2.9% in 2023 and then rise to 3.1% in 2024. Inflation is expected to fall globally from 8.8% in 2022 to 6.6% in 2023 and 4.3% in 2024, remaining above pre-pandemic levels. Monetary policy tightening is starting to cool demand and inflation but the full impact will not be seen until 2024. Downside risks remain from further escalation of the war in Ukraine, debt distress, and financial market repricing in response to inflation news.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
1. INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands
Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928
Website Twitter YouTube LinkedIn
Press Release
Unofficial
No. 2023/37
5 July 2023
Canada, the Kingdom of Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland jointly institute proceedings
against the Islamic Republic of Iran
THE HAGUE, 5 July 2023. Yesterday, Canada, the Kingdom of Sweden, Ukraine and the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland filed a joint application instituting
proceedings against the Islamic Republic of Iran before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the
principal judicial organ of the United Nations, concerning a dispute under the Convention for the
Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation (the “Montreal Convention”).
In their Application, Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom claim that Iran has
violated a series of obligations under the Montreal Convention as a result of the shooting down on
8 January 2020 of a civil aircraft in service, Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752, by military
personnel of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. All 176 passengers and crew aboard the
flight, many of whom were nationals and residents of the applicant States, were killed in the crash.
According to the Applicants, Iran “failed to take all practicable measures to prevent the
unlawful and intentional commission of an offence described in Article 1 of the Montreal
Convention, including the destruction of Flight PS752. It also subsequently failed to conduct an
impartial, transparent, and fair criminal investigation and prosecution consistent with international
law.”
Canada, Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom seek to found the Court’s jurisdiction on
Article 36, paragraph 1, of the Statute of the Court and on Article 14, paragraph 1, of the Montreal
Convention, to which all four Applicants and Iran are parties.
___________
The Application instituting proceedings is available on the Court’s website.
___________
2. - 2 -
Note: The Court’s press releases are prepared by its Registry for information purposes only
and do not constitute official documents.
___________
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
It was established by the United Nations Charter in June 1945 and began its activities in April 1946.
The Court is composed of 15 judges elected for a nine-year term by the General Assembly and the
Security Council of the United Nations. The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague
(Netherlands). The Court has a twofold role: first, to settle, in accordance with international law,
through judgments which have binding force and are without appeal for the parties concerned, legal
disputes submitted to it by States; and, second, to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred
to it by duly authorized United Nations organs and agencies of the system.
___________
Information Department:
Ms Monique Legerman, First Secretary of the Court, Head of Department: +31 (0)70 302 2336
Ms Joanne Moore, Information Officer: +31 (0)70 302 2337
Mr Avo Sevag Garabet, Associate Information Officer: +31 (0)70 302 2394
Email: info@icj-cij.org