Este documento presenta la exposición itinerante "Cultivos nativos de México" del artista plástico e ingeniero agrónomo Cruz García Albarado. La exposición presenta acuarelas de los principales cultivos nativos de México que han sido base de la dieta y cultura prehispánica y contemporánea. La exposición se ha presentado en varios museos y centros culturales en la Ciudad de México y el estado de México entre 2012 y 2014.
Estimación de superficie zafra 2013-2014Miguel Rivera
El documento describe la estimación de la superficie sembrada de caña de azúcar en México para la zafra 2013-2014, realizada mediante la interpretación de imágenes satelitales de alta resolución. Se estimó un área total de 836,832 hectáreas cultivadas con caña de azúcar en el país, distribuidas en diferentes regiones cañeras. El estudio proporciona información sobre la superficie cultivada por región y estado, con el objetivo de facilitar el seguimiento y desarrollo sostenible del cultivo de la caña
El documento describe los servicios de asesoría en desarrollo tecnológico y comercial que ofrece la Oficina de Transferencia del Conocimiento del CIATEJ a las empresas, incluyendo búsqueda de patentes, vigilancia tecnológica, modelo de negocios y valuación de tecnología. Estos servicios están dirigidos a apoyar a empresas que buscan generar nuevos negocios de base tecnológica. El documento incluye los contactos para obtener más información.
Este documento presenta la exposición itinerante "Cultivos nativos de México" del artista plástico e ingeniero agrónomo Cruz García Albarado. La exposición presenta acuarelas de los principales cultivos nativos de México que han sido base de la dieta y cultura prehispánica y contemporánea. La exposición se ha presentado en varios museos y centros culturales en la Ciudad de México y el estado de México entre 2012 y 2014.
Estimación de superficie zafra 2013-2014Miguel Rivera
El documento describe la estimación de la superficie sembrada de caña de azúcar en México para la zafra 2013-2014, realizada mediante la interpretación de imágenes satelitales de alta resolución. Se estimó un área total de 836,832 hectáreas cultivadas con caña de azúcar en el país, distribuidas en diferentes regiones cañeras. El estudio proporciona información sobre la superficie cultivada por región y estado, con el objetivo de facilitar el seguimiento y desarrollo sostenible del cultivo de la caña
El documento describe los servicios de asesoría en desarrollo tecnológico y comercial que ofrece la Oficina de Transferencia del Conocimiento del CIATEJ a las empresas, incluyendo búsqueda de patentes, vigilancia tecnológica, modelo de negocios y valuación de tecnología. Estos servicios están dirigidos a apoyar a empresas que buscan generar nuevos negocios de base tecnológica. El documento incluye los contactos para obtener más información.
2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
https://www.hubspot.com/state-of-marketing
· Scaling relationships and proving ROI
· Social media is the place for search, sales, and service
· Authentic influencer partnerships fuel brand growth
· The strongest connections happen via call, click, chat, and camera.
· Time saved with AI leads to more creative work
· Seeking: A single source of truth
· TLDR; Get on social, try AI, and align your systems.
· More human marketing, powered by robots
ChatGPT is a revolutionary addition to the world since its introduction in 2022. A big shift in the sector of information gathering and processing happened because of this chatbot. What is the story of ChatGPT? How is the bot responding to prompts and generating contents? Swipe through these slides prepared by Expeed Software, a web development company regarding the development and technical intricacies of ChatGPT!
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
The realm of product design is a constantly changing environment where technology and style intersect. Every year introduces fresh challenges and exciting trends that mold the future of this captivating art form. In this piece, we delve into the significant trends set to influence the look and functionality of product design in the year 2024.
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
Mental health has been in the news quite a bit lately. Dozens of U.S. states are currently suing Meta for contributing to the youth mental health crisis by inserting addictive features into their products, while the U.S. Surgeon General is touring the nation to bring awareness to the growing epidemic of loneliness and isolation. The country has endured periods of low national morale, such as in the 1970s when high inflation and the energy crisis worsened public sentiment following the Vietnam War. The current mood, however, feels different. Gallup recently reported that national mental health is at an all-time low, with few bright spots to lift spirits.
To better understand how Americans are feeling and their attitudes towards mental health in general, ThinkNow conducted a nationally representative quantitative survey of 1,500 respondents and found some interesting differences among ethnic, age and gender groups.
Technology
For example, 52% agree that technology and social media have a negative impact on mental health, but when broken out by race, 61% of Whites felt technology had a negative effect, and only 48% of Hispanics thought it did.
While technology has helped us keep in touch with friends and family in faraway places, it appears to have degraded our ability to connect in person. Staying connected online is a double-edged sword since the same news feed that brings us pictures of the grandkids and fluffy kittens also feeds us news about the wars in Israel and Ukraine, the dysfunction in Washington, the latest mass shooting and the climate crisis.
Hispanics may have a built-in defense against the isolation technology breeds, owing to their large, multigenerational households, strong social support systems, and tendency to use social media to stay connected with relatives abroad.
Age and Gender
When asked how individuals rate their mental health, men rate it higher than women by 11 percentage points, and Baby Boomers rank it highest at 83%, saying it’s good or excellent vs. 57% of Gen Z saying the same.
Gen Z spends the most amount of time on social media, so the notion that social media negatively affects mental health appears to be correlated. Unfortunately, Gen Z is also the generation that’s least comfortable discussing mental health concerns with healthcare professionals. Only 40% of them state they’re comfortable discussing their issues with a professional compared to 60% of Millennials and 65% of Boomers.
Race Affects Attitudes
As seen in previous research conducted by ThinkNow, Asian Americans lag other groups when it comes to awareness of mental health issues. Twenty-four percent of Asian Americans believe that having a mental health issue is a sign of weakness compared to the 16% average for all groups. Asians are also considerably less likely to be aware of mental health services in their communities (42% vs. 55%) and most likely to seek out information on social media (51% vs. 35%).
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
Creative operations teams expect increased AI use in 2024. Currently, over half of tasks are not AI-enabled, but this is expected to decrease in the coming year. ChatGPT is the most popular AI tool currently. Business leaders are more actively exploring AI benefits than individual contributors. Most respondents do not believe AI will impact workforce size in 2024. However, some inhibitions still exist around AI accuracy and lack of understanding. Creatives primarily want to use AI to save time on mundane tasks and boost productivity.
Organizational culture includes values, norms, systems, symbols, language, assumptions, beliefs, and habits that influence employee behaviors and how people interpret those behaviors. It is important because culture can help or hinder a company's success. Some key aspects of Netflix's culture that help it achieve results include hiring smartly so every position has stars, focusing on attitude over just aptitude, and having a strict policy against peacocks, whiners, and jerks.
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
PepsiCo provided a safe harbor statement noting that any forward-looking statements are based on currently available information and are subject to risks and uncertainties. It also provided information on non-GAAP measures and directing readers to its website for disclosure and reconciliation. The document then discussed PepsiCo's business overview, including that it is a global beverage and convenient food company with iconic brands, $91 billion in net revenue in 2023, and nearly $14 billion in core operating profit. It operates through a divisional structure with a focus on local consumers.
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
This document provides an overview of content methodology best practices. It defines content methodology as establishing objectives, KPIs, and a culture of continuous learning and iteration. An effective methodology focuses on connecting with audiences, creating optimal content, and optimizing processes. It also discusses why a methodology is needed due to the competitive landscape, proliferation of channels, and opportunities for improvement. Components of an effective methodology include defining objectives and KPIs, audience analysis, identifying opportunities, and evaluating resources. The document concludes with recommendations around creating a content plan, testing and optimizing content over 90 days.
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
The document provides guidance on preparing a job search for 2024. It discusses the state of the job market, focusing on growth in AI and healthcare but also continued layoffs. It recommends figuring out what you want to do by researching interests and skills, then conducting informational interviews. The job search should involve building a personal brand on LinkedIn, actively applying to jobs, tailoring resumes and interviews, maintaining job hunting as a habit, and continuing self-improvement. Once hired, the document advises setting new goals and keeping skills and networking active in case of future opportunities.
A report by thenetworkone and Kurio.
The contributing experts and agencies are (in an alphabetical order): Sylwia Rytel, Social Media Supervisor, 180heartbeats + JUNG v MATT (PL), Sharlene Jenner, Vice President - Director of Engagement Strategy, Abelson Taylor (USA), Alex Casanovas, Digital Director, Atrevia (ES), Dora Beilin, Senior Social Strategist, Barrett Hoffher (USA), Min Seo, Campaign Director, Brand New Agency (KR), Deshé M. Gully, Associate Strategist, Day One Agency (USA), Francesca Trevisan, Strategist, Different (IT), Trevor Crossman, CX and Digital Transformation Director; Olivia Hussey, Strategic Planner; Simi Srinarula, Social Media Manager, The Hallway (AUS), James Hebbert, Managing Director, Hylink (CN / UK), Mundy Álvarez, Planning Director; Pedro Rojas, Social Media Manager; Pancho González, CCO, Inbrax (CH), Oana Oprea, Head of Digital Planning, Jam Session Agency (RO), Amy Bottrill, Social Account Director, Launch (UK), Gaby Arriaga, Founder, Leonardo1452 (MX), Shantesh S Row, Creative Director, Liwa (UAE), Rajesh Mehta, Chief Strategy Officer; Dhruv Gaur, Digital Planning Lead; Leonie Mergulhao, Account Supervisor - Social Media & PR, Medulla (IN), Aurelija Plioplytė, Head of Digital & Social, Not Perfect (LI), Daiana Khaidargaliyeva, Account Manager, Osaka Labs (UK / USA), Stefanie Söhnchen, Vice President Digital, PIABO Communications (DE), Elisabeth Winiartati, Managing Consultant, Head of Global Integrated Communications; Lydia Aprina, Account Manager, Integrated Marketing and Communications; Nita Prabowo, Account Manager, Integrated Marketing and Communications; Okhi, Web Developer, PNTR Group (ID), Kei Obusan, Insights Director; Daffi Ranandi, Insights Manager, Radarr (SG), Gautam Reghunath, Co-founder & CEO, Talented (IN), Donagh Humphreys, Head of Social and Digital Innovation, THINKHOUSE (IRE), Sarah Yim, Strategy Director, Zulu Alpha Kilo (CA).
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
The search marketing landscape is evolving rapidly with new technologies, and professionals, like you, rely on innovative paid search strategies to meet changing demands.
It’s important that you’re ready to implement new strategies in 2024.
Check this out and learn the top trends in paid search advertising that are expected to gain traction, so you can drive higher ROI more efficiently in 2024.
You’ll learn:
- The latest trends in AI and automation, and what this means for an evolving paid search ecosystem.
- New developments in privacy and data regulation.
- Emerging ad formats that are expected to make an impact next year.
Watch Sreekant Lanka from iQuanti and Irina Klein from OneMain Financial as they dive into the future of paid search and explore the trends, strategies, and technologies that will shape the search marketing landscape.
If you’re looking to assess your paid search strategy and design an industry-aligned plan for 2024, then this webinar is for you.
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
From their humble beginnings in 1984, TED has grown into the world’s most powerful amplifier for speakers and thought-leaders to share their ideas. They have over 2,400 filmed talks (not including the 30,000+ TEDx videos) freely available online, and have hosted over 17,500 events around the world.
With over one billion views in a year, it’s no wonder that so many speakers are looking to TED for ideas on how to share their message more effectively.
The article “5 Public-Speaking Tips TED Gives Its Speakers”, by Carmine Gallo for Forbes, gives speakers five practical ways to connect with their audience, and effectively share their ideas on stage.
Whether you are gearing up to get on a TED stage yourself, or just want to master the skills that so many of their speakers possess, these tips and quotes from Chris Anderson, the TED Talks Curator, will encourage you to make the most impactful impression on your audience.
See the full article and more summaries like this on SpeakerHub here: https://speakerhub.com/blog/5-presentation-tips-ted-gives-its-speakers
See the original article on Forbes here:
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=http://www.forbes.com/sites/carminegallo/2016/05/06/5-public-speaking-tips-ted-gives-its-speakers/&refURL=&referrer=#5c07a8221d9b
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
Everyone is in agreement that ChatGPT (and other generative AI tools) will shape the future of work. Yet there is little consensus on exactly how, when, and to what extent this technology will change our world.
Businesses that extract maximum value from ChatGPT will use it as a collaborative tool for everything from brainstorming to technical maintenance.
For individuals, now is the time to pinpoint the skills the future professional will need to thrive in the AI age.
Check out this presentation to understand what ChatGPT is, how it will shape the future of work, and how you can prepare to take advantage.
The document provides career advice for getting into the tech field, including:
- Doing projects and internships in college to build a portfolio.
- Learning about different roles and technologies through industry research.
- Contributing to open source projects to build experience and network.
- Developing a personal brand through a website and social media presence.
- Networking through events, communities, and finding a mentor.
- Practicing interviews through mock interviews and whiteboarding coding questions.
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
1. Core updates from Google periodically change how its algorithms assess and rank websites and pages. This can impact rankings through shifts in user intent, site quality issues being caught up to, world events influencing queries, and overhauls to search like the E-A-T framework.
2. There are many possible user intents beyond just transactional, navigational and informational. Identifying intent shifts is important during core updates. Sites may need to optimize for new intents through different content types and sections.
3. Responding effectively to core updates requires analyzing "before and after" data to understand changes, identifying new intents or page types, and ensuring content matches appropriate intents across video, images, knowledge graphs and more.
A brief introduction to DataScience with explaining of the concepts, algorithms, machine learning, supervised and unsupervised learning, clustering, statistics, data preprocessing, real-world applications etc.
It's part of a Data Science Corner Campaign where I will be discussing the fundamentals of DataScience, AIML, Statistics etc.
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
Here's my presentation on by proven best practices how to manage your work time effectively and how to improve your productivity. It includes practical tips and how to use tools such as Slack, Google Apps, Hubspot, Google Calendar, Gmail and others.
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
The six step guide to practical project management
If you think managing projects is too difficult, think again.
We’ve stripped back project management processes to the
basics – to make it quicker and easier, without sacrificing
the vital ingredients for success.
“If you’re looking for some real-world guidance, then The Six Step Guide to Practical Project Management will help.”
Dr Andrew Makar, Tactical Project Management
2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
https://www.hubspot.com/state-of-marketing
· Scaling relationships and proving ROI
· Social media is the place for search, sales, and service
· Authentic influencer partnerships fuel brand growth
· The strongest connections happen via call, click, chat, and camera.
· Time saved with AI leads to more creative work
· Seeking: A single source of truth
· TLDR; Get on social, try AI, and align your systems.
· More human marketing, powered by robots
ChatGPT is a revolutionary addition to the world since its introduction in 2022. A big shift in the sector of information gathering and processing happened because of this chatbot. What is the story of ChatGPT? How is the bot responding to prompts and generating contents? Swipe through these slides prepared by Expeed Software, a web development company regarding the development and technical intricacies of ChatGPT!
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
The realm of product design is a constantly changing environment where technology and style intersect. Every year introduces fresh challenges and exciting trends that mold the future of this captivating art form. In this piece, we delve into the significant trends set to influence the look and functionality of product design in the year 2024.
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
Mental health has been in the news quite a bit lately. Dozens of U.S. states are currently suing Meta for contributing to the youth mental health crisis by inserting addictive features into their products, while the U.S. Surgeon General is touring the nation to bring awareness to the growing epidemic of loneliness and isolation. The country has endured periods of low national morale, such as in the 1970s when high inflation and the energy crisis worsened public sentiment following the Vietnam War. The current mood, however, feels different. Gallup recently reported that national mental health is at an all-time low, with few bright spots to lift spirits.
To better understand how Americans are feeling and their attitudes towards mental health in general, ThinkNow conducted a nationally representative quantitative survey of 1,500 respondents and found some interesting differences among ethnic, age and gender groups.
Technology
For example, 52% agree that technology and social media have a negative impact on mental health, but when broken out by race, 61% of Whites felt technology had a negative effect, and only 48% of Hispanics thought it did.
While technology has helped us keep in touch with friends and family in faraway places, it appears to have degraded our ability to connect in person. Staying connected online is a double-edged sword since the same news feed that brings us pictures of the grandkids and fluffy kittens also feeds us news about the wars in Israel and Ukraine, the dysfunction in Washington, the latest mass shooting and the climate crisis.
Hispanics may have a built-in defense against the isolation technology breeds, owing to their large, multigenerational households, strong social support systems, and tendency to use social media to stay connected with relatives abroad.
Age and Gender
When asked how individuals rate their mental health, men rate it higher than women by 11 percentage points, and Baby Boomers rank it highest at 83%, saying it’s good or excellent vs. 57% of Gen Z saying the same.
Gen Z spends the most amount of time on social media, so the notion that social media negatively affects mental health appears to be correlated. Unfortunately, Gen Z is also the generation that’s least comfortable discussing mental health concerns with healthcare professionals. Only 40% of them state they’re comfortable discussing their issues with a professional compared to 60% of Millennials and 65% of Boomers.
Race Affects Attitudes
As seen in previous research conducted by ThinkNow, Asian Americans lag other groups when it comes to awareness of mental health issues. Twenty-four percent of Asian Americans believe that having a mental health issue is a sign of weakness compared to the 16% average for all groups. Asians are also considerably less likely to be aware of mental health services in their communities (42% vs. 55%) and most likely to seek out information on social media (51% vs. 35%).
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
Creative operations teams expect increased AI use in 2024. Currently, over half of tasks are not AI-enabled, but this is expected to decrease in the coming year. ChatGPT is the most popular AI tool currently. Business leaders are more actively exploring AI benefits than individual contributors. Most respondents do not believe AI will impact workforce size in 2024. However, some inhibitions still exist around AI accuracy and lack of understanding. Creatives primarily want to use AI to save time on mundane tasks and boost productivity.
Organizational culture includes values, norms, systems, symbols, language, assumptions, beliefs, and habits that influence employee behaviors and how people interpret those behaviors. It is important because culture can help or hinder a company's success. Some key aspects of Netflix's culture that help it achieve results include hiring smartly so every position has stars, focusing on attitude over just aptitude, and having a strict policy against peacocks, whiners, and jerks.
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
PepsiCo provided a safe harbor statement noting that any forward-looking statements are based on currently available information and are subject to risks and uncertainties. It also provided information on non-GAAP measures and directing readers to its website for disclosure and reconciliation. The document then discussed PepsiCo's business overview, including that it is a global beverage and convenient food company with iconic brands, $91 billion in net revenue in 2023, and nearly $14 billion in core operating profit. It operates through a divisional structure with a focus on local consumers.
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
This document provides an overview of content methodology best practices. It defines content methodology as establishing objectives, KPIs, and a culture of continuous learning and iteration. An effective methodology focuses on connecting with audiences, creating optimal content, and optimizing processes. It also discusses why a methodology is needed due to the competitive landscape, proliferation of channels, and opportunities for improvement. Components of an effective methodology include defining objectives and KPIs, audience analysis, identifying opportunities, and evaluating resources. The document concludes with recommendations around creating a content plan, testing and optimizing content over 90 days.
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
The document provides guidance on preparing a job search for 2024. It discusses the state of the job market, focusing on growth in AI and healthcare but also continued layoffs. It recommends figuring out what you want to do by researching interests and skills, then conducting informational interviews. The job search should involve building a personal brand on LinkedIn, actively applying to jobs, tailoring resumes and interviews, maintaining job hunting as a habit, and continuing self-improvement. Once hired, the document advises setting new goals and keeping skills and networking active in case of future opportunities.
A report by thenetworkone and Kurio.
The contributing experts and agencies are (in an alphabetical order): Sylwia Rytel, Social Media Supervisor, 180heartbeats + JUNG v MATT (PL), Sharlene Jenner, Vice President - Director of Engagement Strategy, Abelson Taylor (USA), Alex Casanovas, Digital Director, Atrevia (ES), Dora Beilin, Senior Social Strategist, Barrett Hoffher (USA), Min Seo, Campaign Director, Brand New Agency (KR), Deshé M. Gully, Associate Strategist, Day One Agency (USA), Francesca Trevisan, Strategist, Different (IT), Trevor Crossman, CX and Digital Transformation Director; Olivia Hussey, Strategic Planner; Simi Srinarula, Social Media Manager, The Hallway (AUS), James Hebbert, Managing Director, Hylink (CN / UK), Mundy Álvarez, Planning Director; Pedro Rojas, Social Media Manager; Pancho González, CCO, Inbrax (CH), Oana Oprea, Head of Digital Planning, Jam Session Agency (RO), Amy Bottrill, Social Account Director, Launch (UK), Gaby Arriaga, Founder, Leonardo1452 (MX), Shantesh S Row, Creative Director, Liwa (UAE), Rajesh Mehta, Chief Strategy Officer; Dhruv Gaur, Digital Planning Lead; Leonie Mergulhao, Account Supervisor - Social Media & PR, Medulla (IN), Aurelija Plioplytė, Head of Digital & Social, Not Perfect (LI), Daiana Khaidargaliyeva, Account Manager, Osaka Labs (UK / USA), Stefanie Söhnchen, Vice President Digital, PIABO Communications (DE), Elisabeth Winiartati, Managing Consultant, Head of Global Integrated Communications; Lydia Aprina, Account Manager, Integrated Marketing and Communications; Nita Prabowo, Account Manager, Integrated Marketing and Communications; Okhi, Web Developer, PNTR Group (ID), Kei Obusan, Insights Director; Daffi Ranandi, Insights Manager, Radarr (SG), Gautam Reghunath, Co-founder & CEO, Talented (IN), Donagh Humphreys, Head of Social and Digital Innovation, THINKHOUSE (IRE), Sarah Yim, Strategy Director, Zulu Alpha Kilo (CA).
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
The search marketing landscape is evolving rapidly with new technologies, and professionals, like you, rely on innovative paid search strategies to meet changing demands.
It’s important that you’re ready to implement new strategies in 2024.
Check this out and learn the top trends in paid search advertising that are expected to gain traction, so you can drive higher ROI more efficiently in 2024.
You’ll learn:
- The latest trends in AI and automation, and what this means for an evolving paid search ecosystem.
- New developments in privacy and data regulation.
- Emerging ad formats that are expected to make an impact next year.
Watch Sreekant Lanka from iQuanti and Irina Klein from OneMain Financial as they dive into the future of paid search and explore the trends, strategies, and technologies that will shape the search marketing landscape.
If you’re looking to assess your paid search strategy and design an industry-aligned plan for 2024, then this webinar is for you.
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
From their humble beginnings in 1984, TED has grown into the world’s most powerful amplifier for speakers and thought-leaders to share their ideas. They have over 2,400 filmed talks (not including the 30,000+ TEDx videos) freely available online, and have hosted over 17,500 events around the world.
With over one billion views in a year, it’s no wonder that so many speakers are looking to TED for ideas on how to share their message more effectively.
The article “5 Public-Speaking Tips TED Gives Its Speakers”, by Carmine Gallo for Forbes, gives speakers five practical ways to connect with their audience, and effectively share their ideas on stage.
Whether you are gearing up to get on a TED stage yourself, or just want to master the skills that so many of their speakers possess, these tips and quotes from Chris Anderson, the TED Talks Curator, will encourage you to make the most impactful impression on your audience.
See the full article and more summaries like this on SpeakerHub here: https://speakerhub.com/blog/5-presentation-tips-ted-gives-its-speakers
See the original article on Forbes here:
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=http://www.forbes.com/sites/carminegallo/2016/05/06/5-public-speaking-tips-ted-gives-its-speakers/&refURL=&referrer=#5c07a8221d9b
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
Everyone is in agreement that ChatGPT (and other generative AI tools) will shape the future of work. Yet there is little consensus on exactly how, when, and to what extent this technology will change our world.
Businesses that extract maximum value from ChatGPT will use it as a collaborative tool for everything from brainstorming to technical maintenance.
For individuals, now is the time to pinpoint the skills the future professional will need to thrive in the AI age.
Check out this presentation to understand what ChatGPT is, how it will shape the future of work, and how you can prepare to take advantage.
The document provides career advice for getting into the tech field, including:
- Doing projects and internships in college to build a portfolio.
- Learning about different roles and technologies through industry research.
- Contributing to open source projects to build experience and network.
- Developing a personal brand through a website and social media presence.
- Networking through events, communities, and finding a mentor.
- Practicing interviews through mock interviews and whiteboarding coding questions.
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
1. Core updates from Google periodically change how its algorithms assess and rank websites and pages. This can impact rankings through shifts in user intent, site quality issues being caught up to, world events influencing queries, and overhauls to search like the E-A-T framework.
2. There are many possible user intents beyond just transactional, navigational and informational. Identifying intent shifts is important during core updates. Sites may need to optimize for new intents through different content types and sections.
3. Responding effectively to core updates requires analyzing "before and after" data to understand changes, identifying new intents or page types, and ensuring content matches appropriate intents across video, images, knowledge graphs and more.
A brief introduction to DataScience with explaining of the concepts, algorithms, machine learning, supervised and unsupervised learning, clustering, statistics, data preprocessing, real-world applications etc.
It's part of a Data Science Corner Campaign where I will be discussing the fundamentals of DataScience, AIML, Statistics etc.
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
Here's my presentation on by proven best practices how to manage your work time effectively and how to improve your productivity. It includes practical tips and how to use tools such as Slack, Google Apps, Hubspot, Google Calendar, Gmail and others.
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
The six step guide to practical project management
If you think managing projects is too difficult, think again.
We’ve stripped back project management processes to the
basics – to make it quicker and easier, without sacrificing
the vital ingredients for success.
“If you’re looking for some real-world guidance, then The Six Step Guide to Practical Project Management will help.”
Dr Andrew Makar, Tactical Project Management
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Informe estadístico del sector agroindustrial de la caña de azúcar en méxico zafra 2015 2016
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
NACIONAL
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
Z A F R A S
INICIO DE MOLIENDA
FIN DE MOLIENDA
NÚMERO DE DÍAS DE ZAFRA
HORAS DE ZAFRA
FECHA
FECHA
DÍA
h
30/10/2015 26/10/2014 01/11/2013
05/07/2016 12/07/2015 12/07/2014
178 181184
221,474217,585208,880
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA (SEMANA DE MAYOR MOLIENDA EN ZAFRA)
CAÑA MOLIDA POR DÍA DE ZAFRA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA POR VEINTICUATRO
IMBIBICIÓN PORCIENTO CAÑA
EXTRACCIÓN DE JUGO MEZCLADO % CAÑA
t
t
t
t
t
%
%
54,329,03953,599,82754,188,609
2,591,1102,537,9432,544,446
300,174291,156304,947
15,56215,45715,322
373,489370,980367,728
24.70425.31425.659
96.22497.01897.435
21/10/2012 31/10/2011 25/10/2010 04/11/2009 10/11/2008 22/10/2007 26/11/2006
03/07/200701/07/200817/06/200906/07/201027/06/201125/06/201212/07/2013
169163142150145156193
228,138218,147179,905193,997182,991199,127247,935
49,025,60548,304,64842,516,83843,370,28844,131,57046,231,22961,438,538
2,590,7922,559,2902,438,3722,526,8732,460,3272,516,0252,660,474
289,364295,638298,610288,938305,387295,917317,905
15,39315,51814,86015,39814,96215,24215,947
369,443372,422356,647369,546359,087365,819382,716
23.86524.12324.89324.99125.74525.94124.854
95.08095.03595.14495.83696.63396.79096.285
EXTRACCIÓN POL % POL CAÑA % 94.8294.9294.8694.9895.1395.1495.1994.9895.3495.46
EXTRACCIÓN REDUCIDA A 12.5 % EN CAÑA % 95.1095.2695.2795.3095.4895.4995.4695.2695.6195.69
JUGO MEZCLADO t 46,613,47945,906,51940,452,28941,564,34342,645,77944,746,97759,156,04252,277,53752,001,40752,798,402
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA REFINADA t 1,844,8601,829,9381,670,5551,602,7921,708,4221,565,0172,084,4841,645,0321,773,5451,894,293
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA ESTANDAR t 3,467,4583,513,1843,044,5143,037,0223,200,5353,197,6714,483,5334,017,5613,746,0303,849,056
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA BLANCO ESPECIAL t 228,631 116,635165,090208,120184,921187,498239,773346,693279,808285,570
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA MASCABADO t 1,76212,47439,30780487,04546,00760,08978,891179,816145,068
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL t 5,314,0815,520,6874,962,4954,825,5395,183,5005,048,4696,974,7996,021,2925,984,9616,117,048
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL (SEMANA DE MAYOR PROD. EN ZAFRA) t 300,417297,317292,837292,993297,541287,318314,768304,726297,901300,466
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL BASE ESTÁNDAR t 5,332,5635,537,8194,970,6304,838,5285,199,9855,066,3757,000,2676,039,4066,000,1776,133,114
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL POR DÍA t 31,44433,86934,94732,17035,74832,36236,13933,26732,52734,365
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX PRODUCIDA t 1,767,9781,844,4401,491,2431,490,4571,664,4171,701,9462,353,3522,020,0191,832,8551,975,715
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX POR TONELADA DE CAÑA kg 36.06238.18335.07434.36637.71536.81438.30437.18134.19536.460
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX APORT. A FCA. DE ALCOHOL t 161,93967,07850,37447,87583,64265,23469,98974,30835,22155,699
ALCOHOL 96° PRODUCIDO l 38,865,95919,427,52614,504,47311,826,69319,342,51715,309,26216,685,96317,607,8548,412,13312,029,089
ALCOHOL / MIEL FINAL A 85° BRIX APORTADA l 240.004289.626287.938247.032231.255234.682238.407236.959238.836215.966
CAMPO
CAÑA MOLIDA NETA
SUPERFICIE DE CAÑA COSECHADA
FRENTES DE CORTE
CORTADORES
CAÑA QUEMADA *
CAÑA COSECHADA MECÁNICAMENTE
CAÑA ALZADA MECÁNICAMENTE
VEHÍCULOS DE ACARREO *
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA BRUTA TEÓRICO
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA TEÓRICO
PRECIO DE REF. DEL AZÚCAR PARA PAGO DE LA
CAÑAPRECIO POR TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA
t
ha
Número
Persona
%
%
%
Camión
kg
kg
$
$
47,273,29446,519,77640,944,74141,806,74042,528,07044,473,26559,011,39752,246,81751,520,04752,085,149
675,172683,008663,057647,427673,480703,761780,254790,481783,515778,930
22232422242425272734
65,06466,27765,76666,21870,22278,39572,11073,91770,32771,582
100.00093.64593.74693.10090.97191.63893.09492.29191.42393.341
18.82220.56019.13917.18317.47618.13016.75215.93516.07317.271
79.37977.81980.23483.50280.73181.08281.51182.40182.90681.511
16,63716,53515,78515,51015,78818,16216,11415,99615,20015,861
110.386115.980117.605112.252118.608110.208114.611112.645112.505113.642
114.478120.430122.120116.450123.080114.564119.325117.134117.047118.232
6,356.455,996.136,579.2110,222.2610,368.5810,617.726,633.357,099.838,130.659,860.00
414.77411.60457.97678.52727.41693.35451.17474.03542.45664.49
MOLIENDA Y PRODUCCIÓN
-3.26
-4.00
1.10
0.26
-0.88
4.74
-0.88
1.36
0.43
0.13
0.09
1.53
6.81
2.75
-19.94
-19.32
2.21
0.86
2.22
5.65
7.79
6.62
58.14
43.00
-9.58
1.10
-0.59
25.93
1.78
2.10
7.46
-1.68
4.35
1.01
1.01
21.27
22.50
VALOR MÁXIMO
VALOR MÍNIMO
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
1
11. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
NACIONAL
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
Z A F R A S
PARÁMETROS DE EFICIENCIA
EFICIENCIA EN FÁBRICA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA POR HECTÁREA
RENDIMIENTO EN FÁBRICA
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA POR HECTÁREA
FIBRA EN CAÑA *
%
t
%
t
%
82.04982.47583.37583.00683.06782.54082.78782.41183.31083.424
73716467666679696870
10.83911.42911.67211.12611.74610.92011.35211.08311.16611.288
8877879888
13.12013.25813.44413.22113.34913.35113.15213.13713.17813.089
POL (SACAROSA) EN CAÑA
PUREZA APARENTE EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BAGAZO OBTENIDO *
BAGAZO EN CAÑA *
HUMEDAD EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) ENVASADA
SÓLIDOS EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BRIX EN JUGO MEZCLADO
POL (SACAROSA) EN JUGO MEZCLADO
%
%
t
%
%
%
%
t
%
%
BAGAZO EMPACADO (VENDIDO) t
13.17713.81713.93713.37014.10013.20613.68013.38813.35613.485
81.62482.11782.83182.02982.51481.31481.69082.07382.59682.587
14,112,06914,050,58412,648,23012,644,74912,847,55013,477,06417,552,63615,473,16115,166,88715,294,620
28.78529.08729.74929.15529.11229.15128.56928.48028.29728.225
51.08051.05351.05151.31850.90451.09750.75650.55650.24950.495
2.3722.4102.4162.3332.3592.2322.3002.2952.2022.169
10.81211.39611.62111.08911.71210.89311.32611.05011.12711.250
7,495,3937,706,3176,779,9516,696,5677,167,1327,129,4809,789,1358,424,2918,259,8358,442,663
16.08016.78716.76016.11116.80615.93316.54816.11515.88415.990
13.14113.80113.89713.24113.88012.97213.52513.23413.12513.212
115,24762,553026,11538,93422,39316,82842,76438,23430,869
PÉRDIDAS DE SACAROSA
PÉRDIDAS EN BAGAZO *
PÉRDIDAS EN MIEL FINAL PROD. Y EST. *
PÉRDIDAS EN CACHAZA *
PÉRDIDAS INDETERMINADAS *
PÉRDIDAS TOTALES *
%
%
%
%
%
0.6830.7010.7190.6800.6870.6510.6570.6540.6230.612
1.1861.2461.1551.1171.2371.1901.2411.2041.1241.167
0.1550.1440.1400.1490.1350.1370.1330.1340.1380.139
0.3420.3300.3060.3340.3290.3350.3230.3470.3440.317
2.3652.4212.3172.2802.3872.3132.3552.3382.2292.235
GENERACIÓN Y CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA
GENERACIÓN DE VAPOR
CONSUMO DE VAPOR POR KILOGRAMO DE CAÑA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA / T DE CAÑA
CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA CFE *
t
kg
kW.h
kW.h
kW.h
26,839,56027,486,80723,702,67624,022,22224,198,42324,584,21232,926,68828,231,50528,061,57228,530,902
52,213,04570,759,90840,743,42345,369,30945,799,20848,899,79459,735,77263,757,45448,301,68746,937,434
0.5470.5690.5570.5540.5480.5320.5360.5200.5240.527
796,058,631808,696,953699,592,995696,916,211735,984,944795,759,4281,091,543,473972,996,238989,352,443996,273,019
16.23816.74216.45416.06916.67717.21317.76617.90918.45818.385
CONSUMO DE PETRÓLEO
PETRÓLEO EN PRUEBAS *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA *
PETRÓLEO EN LIQUIDACIÓN *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA DE ALCOHOL *
PETRÓLEO TOTAL *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE CAÑA *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE AZÚCAR *
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
11,948,439.00011,110,407.0008,112,313.0008,558,281.0007,927,142.0005,173,458.0004,290,633.0005,165,439.0001,367,452.0001,500,322.000
374,054,970243,774,634154,300,238154,254,762103,298,01378,264,11179,030,34638,798,73315,689,77627,624,166
9,546,249.0006,758,658.0003,846,081.0004,049,250.0002,984,904.0002,992,434.0002,748,068.0001,823,047.000852,918.000911,987.000
8,879,0213,162,7091,710,653911,0153,710,4341,019,752668,871532,911142,32333,613
404,428,679.000264,806,408.000167,969,285.000167,773,308.000117,920,493.00087,449,755.00086,737,918.00046,320,130.00018,052,469.00030,070,088.000
7.6305.0473.6293.5572.3411.6931.2860.7140.2930.510
70.38944.15731.09331.96619.92815.50311.3316.4442.6224.516
RESUMEN DE TIEMPOS PERDIDOS
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN FÁBRICA *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR PERSONAL *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR DÍAS FESTIVOS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN CAMPO *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR LLUVIAS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO TOTAL *
9.539.869.537.589.657.9110.008.747.668.07%
%
%
%
%
%
2.191.360.920.800.970.911.041.180.620.54
0.680.620.580.430.420.390.450.310.240.29
3.696.593.283.002.222.311.902.223.864.00
5.502.131.9210.261.797.263.967.439.604.57
21.5920.5516.2222.0815.0518.7817.3419.8921.9817.47
0.14
1.69
1.10
2.81
-0.67
0.97
-0.01
0.84
-0.25
0.49
-1.50
1.10
2.21
0.67
0.67
-19.26
-1.75
3.82
0.94
-7.91
0.27
1.67
0.57
0.70
-0.39
-2.82
9.72
76.06
6.93
-76.38
66.57
74.15
72.26
5.32
-12.67
21.16
3.65
-52.42
-20.54
VALOR MÍNIMO
VALOR MÁXIMO
2
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
12. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
NACIONAL
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
7.2
7.5
7.8
8.1
8.4
8.6
8.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
7.87
8.08
7.48 7.45
7.70
7.17
8.94
7.62 7.64
7.85
Azúcar Producida por Hectárea ( t/ha )
647.4
671.3
695.1
719.0
742.8
766.6
790.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
675.17
683.01
663.06
647.43
673.48
703.76
780.25
790.48
783.52
778.93
Superficie de Caña Cosechada ( Miles de hectáreas )
42.5
45.7
48.8
52.0
55.1
58.3
61.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
49.03
48.30
42.52
43.37
44.13
46.23
61.44
54.33
53.60
54.19
Caña Molida Bruta (Millones de toneladas)
4.8
5.2
5.5
5.9
6.3
6.6
7.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
5.31
5.52
4.96
4.83
5.18
5.05
6.97
6.02 5.98
6.12
Azúcar Producida Total (Millones de toneladas )
10.8
11.0
11.1
11.3
11.4
11.6
11.7
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
10.84
11.43
11.67
11.13
11.75
10.92
11.35
11.08
11.17
11.29
Rendimiento en Fábrica (%)
64.1
66.6
69.0
71.4
73.9
76.3
78.7
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
72.61
70.72
64.12
66.99
65.53 65.69
78.74
68.73 68.41
69.57
Caña Molida Bruta por Hectárea ( t/ha )
3
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
13. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
NACIONAL
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
82.0
82.3
82.5
82.7
83.0
83.2
83.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
82.05
82.47
83.37
83.01
83.07
82.54
82.79
82.41
83.31
83.42
Eficiencia en Fábrica (%)
15.9
16.7
17.5
18.2
19.0
19.8
20.6
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
18.82
20.56
19.14
17.18
17.48
18.13
16.75
15.93
16.07
17.27
Caña Cosechada Mecánicamente (%)
91.0
92.5
94.0
95.5
97.0
98.5
100.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
100.00
93.65 93.75
93.10
90.97
91.64
93.09
92.29
91.42
93.34
Caña Quemada (%)
24.0
26.3
28.6
30.9
33.2
35.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
28.79 29.09
29.75
29.16 29.11 29.15
28.57 28.48 28.30 28.22
Bagazo en Caña (%)
13.2
13.3
13.5
13.6
13.8
13.9
14.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
13.18
13.82
13.94
13.37
14.10
13.21
13.68
13.39
13.36
13.49
Sacarosa en Caña (%)
81.3
81.6
81.8
82.1
82.3
82.6
82.8
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
81.62
82.12
82.83
82.03
82.51
81.31
81.69
82.07
82.60 82.59
Pureza Aparente en Jugo Mezclado (%)
4
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
14. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
NACIONAL
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
0.306
0.312
0.319
0.326
0.333
0.340
0.347
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.34
0.33
0.31
0.33
0.33
0.34
0.32
0.35
0.34
0.32
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Indeterminadas (%)
114.5
115.9
117.3
118.8
120.2
121.6
123.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
114.48
120.43
122.12
116.45
123.08
114.56
119.33
117.13 117.05
118.23
Karbe / Tonelada de Caña Neta Teórico ( kg / t )
1.12
1.14
1.16
1.18
1.20
1.22
1.25
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.19
1.25
1.16
1.12
1.24
1.19
1.24
1.20
1.12
1.17
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Miel Final (%)
0.61
0.63
0.65
0.67
0.68
0.70
0.72
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.68
0.70
0.72
0.68
0.69
0.65
0.66
0.65
0.62
0.61
Pérdida de Sacarosa en Bagazo (%)
0.133
0.136
0.140
0.144
0.148
0.152
0.155
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.155
0.144
0.140
0.149
0.135
0.137
0.133
0.134
0.138
0.139
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Cachaza (%)
2.23
2.26
2.29
2.33
2.36
2.39
2.42
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2.37
2.42
2.32
2.28
2.39
2.31
2.35
2.34
2.23
2.24
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Totales (%)
5
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
15. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
NACIONAL
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
16.1
16.5
16.9
17.3
17.7
18.1
18.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
16.24
16.74
16.45
16.07
16.68
17.21
17.77
17.91
18.46 18.39
Generación de Energía Eléctrica por Tonelada de Caña
(kwh/t)
18.1
82.4
146.8
211.2
275.6
340.0
404.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
404.43
264.81
167.97 167.77
117.92
87.45 86.74
46.32
18.05
30.07
Consumo de Petróleo Total ( Millones de Litros)
1,490.5
1,634.3
1,778.1
1,921.9
2,065.7
2,209.5
2,353.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1,768.0
1,844.4
1,491.2 1,490.5
1,664.4
1,701.9
2,353.4
2,020.0
1,832.9
1,975.7
Miel Final 85° Brix Producida ( Miles de Toneladas )
15.0
16.2
17.4
18.6
19.7
20.9
22.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
21.59
20.55
16.22
22.08
15.05
18.78
17.34
19.89
21.98
17.47
Tiempo Perdido Total (%)
1.8
3.2
4.6
6.0
7.4
8.9
10.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
5.50
2.13 1.92
10.26
1.79
7.26
3.96
7.43
9.60
4.57
Tiempo Perdido por Lluvia (%)
0.520
0.528
0.536
0.544
0.553
0.561
0.569
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.547
0.569
0.557
0.554
0.548
0.532
0.536
0.520
0.524
0.527
Consumo de Vapor en Kilogramos por Kilogramos de Caña
6
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
16. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: TAMAULIPAS CONSORCIO: SÁENZ
INGENIO: AARÓN SÁENZ GARZA
Z A F R A S
INICIO DE MOLIENDA
FIN DE MOLIENDA
NÚMERO DE DÍAS DE ZAFRA
HORAS DE ZAFRA
FECHA
FECHA
DÍA
h
19/12/2015 16/11/2014 09/11/2013
19/06/2016 18/06/2015 22/06/2014
183 223214
5,3595,1354,401
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA (SEMANA DE MAYOR MOLIENDA EN ZAFRA)
CAÑA MOLIDA POR DÍA DE ZAFRA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA POR VEINTICUATRO
IMBIBICIÓN PORCIENTO CAÑA
EXTRACCIÓN DE JUGO MEZCLADO % CAÑA
t
t
t
t
t
%
%
1,217,6751,112,039830,025
52,17247,76943,926
5,4605,1964,536
308303281
7,3977,2776,753
27.87226.47626.824
99.91798.19898.281
29/10/2012 31/10/2011 25/10/2010 04/11/2009 24/11/2008 22/10/2007 26/11/2006
31/05/200707/06/200828/05/200903/04/201030/04/201109/05/201213/06/2013
186229186150188191227
4,4575,5044,4523,6084,5044,5935,457
1,060,6081,227,8031,062,951798,8431,097,3121,054,6181,413,489
48,83550,47646,99446,12447,62950,74550,420
5,7025,3625,7155,3265,8375,5226,227
292293281282290286300
7,0027,0336,7346,7566,9536,8607,194
19.59823.30622.38527.37723.78023.94928.232
92.67795.45094.20398.54697.55295.983101.630
EXTRACCIÓN POL % POL CAÑA % 95.0895.1894.3194.3495.7995.0094.9393.9593.5993.85
EXTRACCIÓN REDUCIDA A 12.5 % EN CAÑA % 95.0895.3394.4394.4195.6094.8994.8293.8693.5293.87
JUGO MEZCLADO t 982,9361,171,9331,001,335787,2311,070,4511,012,2541,436,5261,216,6701,092,001815,758
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA REFINADA t 42,234116,45586,32284,104110,20875,76026,43771,40574,61958,095
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA ESTANDAR t 75,45320,37230,500017,29829,327135,83143,30426,64927,507
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA BLANCO ESPECIAL t 0 000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA MASCABADO t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL t 117,686136,827116,82284,104127,506105,087162,268114,709101,26885,602
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL (SEMANA DE MAYOR PROD. EN ZAFRA) t 5,5925,5925,5225,3015,5945,9686,2395,8916,0625,185
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL BASE ESTÁNDAR t 118,052137,460117,29484,532128,089105,501162,726115,385101,65385,937
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL POR DÍA t 633597628561678550715514473468
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX PRODUCIDA t 35,58243,74035,36324,32736,63335,04048,59740,29442,61029,691
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX POR TONELADA DE CAÑA kg 33.54935.62533.26930.45233.38433.22534.38133.09138.31735.772
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX APORT. A FCA. DE ALCOHOL t 004,4156,38614,24111,17311,2866,56909,847
ALCOHOL 96° PRODUCIDO l 001,021,9271,607,9913,195,9652,583,7112,480,4221,387,37101,798,986
ALCOHOL / MIEL FINAL A 85° BRIX APORTADA l 0.0000.000231.476251.782224.418231.255219.770211.2020.000182.695
CAMPO
CAÑA MOLIDA NETA
SUPERFICIE DE CAÑA COSECHADA
FRENTES DE CORTE
CORTADORES
CAÑA QUEMADA *
CAÑA COSECHADA MECÁNICAMENTE
CAÑA ALZADA MECÁNICAMENTE
VEHÍCULOS DE ACARREO *
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA BRUTA TEÓRICO
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA TEÓRICO
PRECIO DE REF. DEL AZÚCAR PARA PAGO DE LA
CAÑAPRECIO POR TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA
t
ha
Número
Persona
%
%
%
Camión
kg
kg
$
$
980,1131,139,298980,023734,2351,019,207963,4481,295,9431,125,8811,022,968755,158
14,16015,64014,29615,68013,81918,04218,17719,11517,22511,461
10111110121112121210
801780808810785683689728771402
100.00099.79392.40568.85078.16369.81074.22877.70690.85391.716
55.81458.39752.93851.21650.39154.25247.22243.27147.04468.875
44.18641.60347.06248.78449.60945.74852.77856.72952.95631.125
297310308288290251297246257217
117.833120.773116.069107.677120.789107.314121.941111.071104.830113.941
127.510130.155125.891117.152130.046117.469133.001120.127113.958125.237
6,356.455,996.136,579.2110,222.2610,368.5810,617.726,633.357,099.838,130.659,860.00
461.99444.84472.11682.61768.58710.93502.88486.14528.13703.86
MOLIENDA Y PRODUCCIÓN
-14.49
-14.30
-25.36
-8.04
-7.20
-12.72
-7.20
1.31
0.08
0.28
0.38
-25.30
-22.15
3.22
0.00
0.00
-15.47
-14.46
-15.46
-1.15
-30.32
-6.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
-26.18
-33.46
-16.67
-47.86
0.95
46.41
-41.22
-15.56
8.69
9.90
21.27
33.27
VALOR MÁXIMO
VALOR MÍNIMO
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
7
17. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: TAMAULIPAS CONSORCIO: SÁENZ
INGENIO: AARÓN SÁENZ GARZA
Z A F R A S
PARÁMETROS DE EFICIENCIA
EFICIENCIA EN FÁBRICA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA POR HECTÁREA
RENDIMIENTO EN FÁBRICA
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA POR HECTÁREA
FIBRA EN CAÑA *
%
t
%
t
%
79.73677.73978.45980.05881.84277.84180.31072.09770.72675.063
75797451795878646572
11.09611.14410.99010.52811.6209.96511.4809.4209.10710.313
8985969667
12.50012.85012.73012.63012.04012.25012.26012.33012.37012.530
POL (SACAROSA) EN CAÑA
PUREZA APARENTE EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BAGAZO OBTENIDO *
BAGAZO EN CAÑA *
HUMEDAD EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) ENVASADA
SÓLIDOS EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BRIX EN JUGO MEZCLADO
POL (SACAROSA) EN JUGO MEZCLADO
%
%
t
%
%
%
%
t
%
%
BAGAZO EMPACADO (VENDIDO) t
13.87614.31013.98013.13814.17712.77414.24913.06412.84713.710
83.19482.59080.01078.11083.23081.27084.18083.20077.29079.960
285,530342,022299,557230,312287,802294,933376,019340,396314,461236,913
26.92127.85628.18228.83126.22827.96626.60227.95528.27828.543
50.01050.45050.82052.28050.82152.77650.01251.87050.69551.333
2.5382.4772.8212.5802.2772.2832.7172.8262.9102.953
11.06411.12810.96910.51811.6039.94411.4439.4199.08610.291
168,185202,556175,164126,758179,028157,484229,717179,647173,012133,571
17.11017.28417.49316.10216.72515.55815.99114.76515.84416.374
14.23514.27513.99612.57713.92112.64413.30912.28512.24513.092
0000000000
PÉRDIDAS DE SACAROSA
PÉRDIDAS EN BAGAZO *
PÉRDIDAS EN MIEL FINAL PROD. Y EST. *
PÉRDIDAS EN CACHAZA *
PÉRDIDAS INDETERMINADAS *
PÉRDIDAS TOTALES *
%
%
%
%
%
0.6830.6900.7950.7440.5970.6380.7230.7900.8230.843
1.2401.2861.2701.0901.2501.1971.1531.2511.5101.356
0.2620.2190.2020.1870.1280.1620.1370.1550.2290.196
0.6270.9920.7440.5990.5990.8330.7931.4491.1991.024
2.8123.1873.0112.6202.5742.8312.8063.6453.7613.419
GENERACIÓN Y CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA
GENERACIÓN DE VAPOR
CONSUMO DE VAPOR POR KILOGRAMO DE CAÑA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA / T DE CAÑA
CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA CFE *
t
kg
kW.h
kW.h
kW.h
604,470770,262643,376457,889633,706601,600820,048776,653733,680535,990
1,658,9171,831,6702,174,8831,874,5352,042,0003,053,1605,394,0002,354,500340,5205,809,800
0.5700.6270.6050.5730.5780.5700.5800.6380.6600.646
20,419,00027,408,00023,557,00017,012,43124,344,00021,534,00025,254,00022,671,00022,616,00014,807,342
19.25222.32322.16221.29622.18520.41917.86618.61820.33717.840
CONSUMO DE PETRÓLEO
PETRÓLEO EN PRUEBAS *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA *
PETRÓLEO EN LIQUIDACIÓN *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA DE ALCOHOL *
PETRÓLEO TOTAL *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE CAÑA *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE AZÚCAR *
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
160,033.000126,598.000191,027.000218,133.000242,983.000179,500.000267,834.0000.000230,637.00098,936.000
5,083,5148,411,5124,702,0603,282,1063,466,059152,4411,636,371362,230905,610606,616
127,014.000146,599.00024,851.00066,268.0000.0000.0000.00027,612.0000.0000.000
00194,141749,3991,273,742236,816502,12249,181033,613
5,370,561.0008,684,709.0005,112,079.0004,315,906.0004,982,784.000568,757.0002,406,327.000439,023.0001,136,247.000739,165.000
4.7936.8514.4244.1093.1590.1451.1580.2970.8140.731
43.19661.47640.25039.02427.1831.45110.0843.1588.9437.086
RESUMEN DE TIEMPOS PERDIDOS
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN FÁBRICA *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR PERSONAL *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR DÍAS FESTIVOS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN CAMPO *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR LLUVIAS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO TOTAL *
9.7112.2414.677.7510.727.3710.6911.1916.6718.65%
%
%
%
%
%
5.671.290.140.185.160.010.736.020.210.05
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
0.619.220.000.550.020.000.020.014.110.57
2.451.110.0912.860.0012.292.159.047.5913.70
18.4423.8714.8921.3415.9019.6713.5926.2728.5832.97
6.13
12.18
13.25
27.04
1.29
6.72
3.45
-24.66
0.94
1.26
1.47
13.26
-22.80
3.35
6.92
0.00
2.42
-10.19
-14.39
-14.60
-9.10
-26.94
-2.12
-34.53
-12.28
1,606.16
-57.10
-33.02
0.00
0.00
-34.95
-10.26
-20.76
11.87
-77.56
0.00
-86.08
80.51
15.36
VALOR MÍNIMO
VALOR MÁXIMO
8
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
18. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: TAMAULIPAS CONSORCIO: SÁENZ
INGENIO: AARÓN SÁENZ GARZA
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
5.4
6.0
6.7
7.3
7.9
8.6
9.2
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
8.31
8.75
8.17
5.36
9.23
5.82
8.93
6.00
5.88
7.47
Azúcar Producida por Hectárea ( t/ha )
11.5
12.7
14.0
15.3
16.6
17.8
19.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
14.16
15.64
14.30
15.68
13.82
18.04 18.18
19.11
17.23
11.46
Superficie de Caña Cosechada ( Miles de hectáreas )
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.06
1.23
1.06
0.80
1.10
1.05
1.41
1.22
1.11
0.83
Caña Molida Bruta (Millones de toneladas)
0.08
0.10
0.11
0.12
0.14
0.15
0.16
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.12
0.14
0.12
0.08
0.13
0.11
0.16
0.11
0.10
0.09
Azúcar Producida Total (Millones de toneladas )
9.1
9.5
9.9
10.4
10.8
11.2
11.6
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
11.10 11.14
10.99
10.53
11.62
9.96
11.48
9.42
9.11
10.31
Rendimiento en Fábrica (%)
50.9
55.7
60.4
65.2
69.9
74.7
79.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
74.90
78.50
74.35
50.95
79.41
58.45
77.76
63.70
64.56
72.42
Caña Molida Bruta por Hectárea ( t/ha )
9
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
19. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: TAMAULIPAS CONSORCIO: SÁENZ
INGENIO: AARÓN SÁENZ GARZA
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
70.7
72.6
74.4
76.3
78.1
80.0
81.8
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
79.74
77.74
78.46
80.06
81.84
77.84
80.31
72.10
70.73
75.06
Eficiencia en Fábrica (%)
43.3
47.5
51.8
56.1
60.3
64.6
68.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
55.81
58.40
52.94
51.22
50.39
54.25
47.22
43.27
47.04
68.88
Caña Cosechada Mecánicamente (%)
68.8
74.0
79.2
84.4
89.6
94.8
100.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
100.00 99.79
92.41
68.85
78.16
69.81
74.23
77.71
90.85 91.72
Caña Quemada (%)
24.0
26.3
28.6
30.9
33.2
35.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
26.92
27.86
28.18
28.83
26.23
27.97
26.60
27.95
28.28 28.54
Bagazo en Caña (%)
12.8
13.0
13.3
13.5
13.8
14.1
14.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
13.88
14.31
13.98
13.14
14.18
12.77
14.25
13.06
12.85
13.71
Sacarosa en Caña (%)
77.3
78.4
79.6
80.7
81.9
83.0
84.2
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
83.19
82.59
80.01
78.11
83.23
81.27
84.18
83.20
77.29
79.96
Pureza Aparente en Jugo Mezclado (%)
10
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
20. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: TAMAULIPAS CONSORCIO: SÁENZ
INGENIO: AARÓN SÁENZ GARZA
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
0.6
0.7
0.9
1.0
1.2
1.3
1.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.63
0.99
0.74
0.60 0.60
0.83
0.79
1.45
1.20
1.02
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Indeterminadas (%)
114.0
117.1
120.3
123.5
126.7
129.8
133.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
127.51
130.16
125.89
117.15
130.05
117.47
133.00
120.13
113.96
125.24
Karbe / Tonelada de Caña Neta Teórico ( kg / t )
1.09
1.16
1.23
1.30
1.37
1.44
1.51
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.24
1.29
1.27
1.09
1.25
1.20
1.15
1.25
1.51
1.36
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Miel Final (%)
0.60
0.64
0.68
0.72
0.76
0.80
0.84
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.68 0.69
0.80
0.74
0.60
0.64
0.72
0.79
0.82
0.84
Pérdida de Sacarosa en Bagazo (%)
0.13
0.15
0.17
0.19
0.22
0.24
0.26
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.262
0.219
0.202
0.187
0.128
0.162
0.137
0.155
0.229
0.196
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Cachaza (%)
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2.81
3.19
3.01
2.62
2.57
2.83 2.81
3.65
3.76
3.42
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Totales (%)
11
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
21. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: TAMAULIPAS CONSORCIO: SÁENZ
INGENIO: AARÓN SÁENZ GARZA
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
17.8
18.6
19.3
20.1
20.8
21.6
22.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
19.25
22.32
22.16
21.30
22.19
20.42
17.87
18.62
20.34
17.84
Generación de Energía Eléctrica por Tonelada de Caña
(kwh/t)
0.4
1.8
3.2
4.6
5.9
7.3
8.7
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
5.37
8.68
5.11
4.32
4.98
0.57
2.41
0.44
1.14
0.74
Consumo de Petróleo Total ( Millones de Litros)
24.33
28.37
32.42
36.46
40.51
44.55
48.60
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
35.6
43.7
35.4
24.3
36.6
35.0
48.6
40.3
42.6
29.7
Miel Final 85° Brix Producida ( Miles de Toneladas )
13.6
16.8
20.0
23.3
26.5
29.7
33.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
18.44
23.87
14.89
21.34
15.90
19.67
13.59
26.27
28.58
32.97
Tiempo Perdido Total (%)
0.0
2.3
4.6
6.8
9.1
11.4
13.7
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2.45
1.11
0.09
12.86
0.00
12.29
2.15
9.04
7.59
13.70
Tiempo Perdido por Lluvia (%)
0.57
0.58
0.60
0.61
0.63
0.64
0.66
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.570
0.627
0.605
0.573
0.578
0.570
0.580
0.638
0.660
0.646
Consumo de Vapor en Kilogramos por Kilogramos de Caña
12
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
22. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: OAXACA CONSORCIO: GRUPO PROMOTORA INDUSTRIAL AZUCARERA
INGENIO: ADOLFO LÓPEZ MATEOS
Z A F R A S
INICIO DE MOLIENDA
FIN DE MOLIENDA
NÚMERO DE DÍAS DE ZAFRA
HORAS DE ZAFRA
FECHA
FECHA
DÍA
h
20/11/2015 16/11/2014 15/11/2013
06/06/2016 02/06/2015 27/05/2014
199 193199
4,6334,7684,788
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA (SEMANA DE MAYOR MOLIENDA EN ZAFRA)
CAÑA MOLIDA POR DÍA DE ZAFRA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA POR VEINTICUATRO
IMBIBICIÓN PORCIENTO CAÑA
EXTRACCIÓN DE JUGO MEZCLADO % CAÑA
t
t
t
t
t
%
%
1,602,0471,552,5961,702,820
64,45464,11770,716
8,3017,8028,557
383374399
9,1878,9789,580
28.54027.31026.180
99.60098.96199.180
06/11/2012 20/11/2011 11/11/2010 15/11/2009 10/11/2008 08/11/2007 30/11/2006
08/06/200712/06/200804/05/200902/06/201009/05/201102/06/201221/06/2013
190217174198179194227
4,5715,1964,1864,7554,2954,6625,443
1,493,1391,560,0651,289,0631,414,9541,414,7331,528,1721,867,960
65,89565,43864,15165,43262,84265,21267,502
7,8597,1897,4087,1467,9047,8778,229
385367362364356367389
9,2498,8158,6898,7358,5558,8179,346
25.45026.77028.09027.83028.91026.04029.200
97.64898.725100.558100.392100.71197.875100.069
EXTRACCIÓN POL % POL CAÑA % 96.3696.3996.3796.2696.6095.7595.8595.9095.5596.33
EXTRACCIÓN REDUCIDA A 12.5 % EN CAÑA % 96.5196.5396.4796.3496.6895.8195.9796.0395.7896.38
JUGO MEZCLADO t 1,458,0171,540,1781,296,2621,420,5031,424,7861,495,7051,869,2561,595,6321,536,4691,688,851
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA REFINADA t 171,887183,000150,632152,890175,059155,151211,284182,293169,073189,587
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA ESTANDAR t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA BLANCO ESPECIAL t 0 000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA MASCABADO t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL t 171,887183,000150,632152,890175,059155,151211,284182,293169,073189,587
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL (SEMANA DE MAYOR PROD. EN ZAFRA) t 7,9607,9607,4307,5537,7887,2458,1887,6247,2358,181
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL BASE ESTÁNDAR t 172,752183,921151,390153,659175,940155,931212,347183,210169,923190,541
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL POR DÍA t 905843866772978800931945850953
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX PRODUCIDA t 45,17547,15535,36042,36340,16047,31857,86952,31047,89351,033
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX POR TONELADA DE CAÑA kg 30.25530.22627.43129.94028.38730.96430.98032.65230.84729.970
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX APORT. A FCA. DE ALCOHOL t 0000000000
ALCOHOL 96° PRODUCIDO l 0000000000
ALCOHOL / MIEL FINAL A 85° BRIX APORTADA l 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
CAMPO
CAÑA MOLIDA NETA
SUPERFICIE DE CAÑA COSECHADA
FRENTES DE CORTE
CORTADORES
CAÑA QUEMADA *
CAÑA COSECHADA MECÁNICAMENTE
CAÑA ALZADA MECÁNICAMENTE
VEHÍCULOS DE ACARREO *
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA BRUTA TEÓRICO
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA TEÓRICO
PRECIO DE REF. DEL AZÚCAR PARA PAGO DE LA
CAÑAPRECIO POR TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA
t
ha
Número
Persona
%
%
%
Camión
kg
kg
$
$
1,428,6731,471,8401,233,7591,344,2321,343,0021,449,9011,762,9271,513,4351,470,6971,615,301
23,01625,09223,11823,27826,04027,89426,83927,85228,96328,411
21232624272622242426
2,0022,1331,6681,6591,9771,7802,3902,1722,2082,387
100.000100.000100.000100.000100.00099.467100.000100.000100.000100.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000
386377343310328370404449442484
113.036115.309113.015106.003119.96899.524111.120111.969108.307108.905
118.136122.221118.081111.580126.375104.897117.741118.525114.339114.806
6,356.455,996.136,579.2110,222.2610,368.5810,617.726,633.357,099.838,130.659,860.00
428.03417.73442.82650.14746.89634.85445.18479.66529.90645.23
MOLIENDA Y PRODUCCIÓN
0.00
0.41
9.68
10.29
6.71
9.68
6.71
-4.14
0.22
0.82
0.63
9.92
12.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.13
13.07
12.13
12.13
6.56
-2.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.83
-1.91
8.33
8.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.50
0.55
0.41
21.27
21.76
VALOR MÁXIMO
VALOR MÍNIMO
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
13
23. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: OAXACA CONSORCIO: GRUPO PROMOTORA INDUSTRIAL AZUCARERA
INGENIO: ADOLFO LÓPEZ MATEOS
Z A F R A S
PARÁMETROS DE EFICIENCIA
EFICIENCIA EN FÁBRICA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA POR HECTÁREA
RENDIMIENTO EN FÁBRICA
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA POR HECTÁREA
FIBRA EN CAÑA *
%
t
%
t
%
86.07786.06087.38985.48687.46984.54685.83085.65084.39085.930
65625661545570585460
11.51211.73011.68510.80512.37410.15311.31111.37910.89011.134
7777768767
12.96012.95012.83012.73012.78012.65012.83312.87213.09412.656
POL (SACAROSA) EN CAÑA
PUREZA APARENTE EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BAGAZO OBTENIDO *
BAGAZO EN CAÑA *
HUMEDAD EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) ENVASADA
SÓLIDOS EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BRIX EN JUGO MEZCLADO
POL (SACAROSA) EN JUGO MEZCLADO
%
%
t
%
%
%
%
t
%
%
BAGAZO EMPACADO (VENDIDO) t
13.36113.62013.36012.63014.13012.00013.16613.27312.89112.944
83.09383.19082.93081.61083.46079.78082.57682.54182.14881.908
415,126437,517354,899388,233398,946430,403544,148463,640440,141459,768
27.80228.04027.53027.44027.57728.16029.13028.93828.34727.004
50.58051.00050.75050.93051.18052.44053.33052.84050.92050.350
1.7501.7541.7601.7201.7031.8101.8761.8822.0251.759
11.50011.71911.67410.79412.36210.14311.30011.36710.87911.123
231,336246,125200,120210,755231,414220,017285,471247,029232,800259,222
15.86615.98015.43814.83716.24214.71015.27215.48215.15215.349
13.18413.29412.80212.10813.55611.73612.61112.77912.44712.572
0000000000
PÉRDIDAS DE SACAROSA
PÉRDIDAS EN BAGAZO *
PÉRDIDAS EN MIEL FINAL PROD. Y EST. *
PÉRDIDAS EN CACHAZA *
PÉRDIDAS INDETERMINADAS *
PÉRDIDAS TOTALES *
%
%
%
%
%
0.4870.4920.4840.4720.4800.5100.5460.5450.5740.475
0.9400.9950.8750.9470.9530.9380.9761.0221.0550.973
0.1910.1760.1330.1920.1600.1920.1650.1360.1630.194
0.2430.2350.1920.2210.1780.2150.1790.2020.2210.178
1.8601.8981.6851.8331.7711.8541.8661.9052.0131.821
GENERACIÓN Y CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA
GENERACIÓN DE VAPOR
CONSUMO DE VAPOR POR KILOGRAMO DE CAÑA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA / T DE CAÑA
CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA CFE *
t
kg
kW.h
kW.h
kW.h
866,041892,682737,177816,202820,390815,064990,742871,260864,435920,848
0000000000
0.5800.5720.5720.5770.5800.5330.5300.5440.5570.541
26,516,38930,159,56625,303,29829,327,70329,509,28432,017,59437,275,66230,747,60729,236,96931,257,392
17.75919.33219.62920.72720.85920.95219.95519.19318.83118.356
CONSUMO DE PETRÓLEO
PETRÓLEO EN PRUEBAS *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA *
PETRÓLEO EN LIQUIDACIÓN *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA DE ALCOHOL *
PETRÓLEO TOTAL *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE CAÑA *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE AZÚCAR *
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
800,058.000551,573.000924,280.000699,017.000495,479.000407,401.000371,591.000825,392.000114,508.000433,387.000
7,826,8097,031,5364,310,6029,973,7303,664,9635,191,5485,154,3684,900,5383,974,3093,854,386
461,214.000582,214.000447,342.000190,089.00073,281.00041,460.00079,500.00016,000.00057,348.00014,679.000
0000000000
9,088,081.0008,165,323.0005,682,224.00010,862,836.0004,233,723.0005,640,409.0005,605,459.0005,741,930.0004,146,165.0004,302,452.000
5.2424.5073.3447.0492.5913.3972.7593.0592.5602.264
45.53538.42428.61765.23520.93633.46124.39526.88323.50620.330
RESUMEN DE TIEMPOS PERDIDOS
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN FÁBRICA *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR PERSONAL *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR DÍAS FESTIVOS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN CAMPO *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR LLUVIAS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO TOTAL *
5.536.079.675.054.883.446.917.917.507.16%
%
%
%
%
%
1.930.510.501.260.680.150.500.750.250.55
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
2.369.172.021.620.390.850.350.630.590.81
5.412.502.7610.301.646.324.100.364.612.38
15.2418.2514.9418.237.5910.7611.869.6612.9510.90
1.82
11.81
2.24
14.31
-3.35
0.41
-0.29
4.46
-4.74
-1.12
-13.12
2.24
11.35
1.30
1.00
0.00
-17.25
-7.70
18.81
-19.14
-9.53
6.53
-2.87
6.91
-2.52
0.00
278.48
-3.02
-74.40
0.00
3.77
-11.57
-13.51
-4.45
115.57
0.00
38.26
-48.44
-15.81
VALOR MÍNIMO
VALOR MÁXIMO
14
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
24. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: OAXACA CONSORCIO: GRUPO PROMOTORA INDUSTRIAL AZUCARERA
INGENIO: ADOLFO LÓPEZ MATEOS
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
5.6
5.9
6.3
6.7
7.1
7.5
7.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
7.47
7.29
6.52 6.57
6.72
5.56
7.87
6.55
5.84
6.67
Azúcar Producida por Hectárea ( t/ha )
23.0
24.0
25.0
26.0
27.0
28.0
29.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
23.02
25.09
23.12 23.28
26.04
27.89
26.84
27.85
28.96
28.41
Superficie de Caña Cosechada ( Miles de hectáreas )
1.29
1.39
1.48
1.58
1.67
1.77
1.87
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.49
1.56
1.29
1.41 1.41
1.53
1.87
1.60
1.55
1.70
Caña Molida Bruta (Millones de toneladas)
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
0.20
0.21
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.17
0.18
0.15
0.15
0.18
0.16
0.21
0.18
0.17
0.19
Azúcar Producida Total (Millones de toneladas )
10.2
10.5
10.9
11.3
11.6
12.0
12.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
11.51
11.73 11.69
10.81
12.37
10.15
11.31
11.38
10.89
11.13
Rendimiento en Fábrica (%)
53.6
56.3
58.9
61.6
64.3
66.9
69.6
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
64.87
62.17
55.76
60.79
54.33 54.79
69.60
57.52
53.61
59.94
Caña Molida Bruta por Hectárea ( t/ha )
15
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
25. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: OAXACA CONSORCIO: GRUPO PROMOTORA INDUSTRIAL AZUCARERA
INGENIO: ADOLFO LÓPEZ MATEOS
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
84.4
84.9
85.4
85.9
86.4
87.0
87.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
86.08 86.06
87.39
85.49
87.47
84.55
85.83
85.65
84.39
85.93
Eficiencia en Fábrica (%)
-5.0
-3.3
-1.7
0.0
1.7
3.3
5.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Caña Cosechada Mecánicamente (%)
99.47
99.56
99.64
99.73
99.82
99.91
100.00
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
99.47
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Caña Quemada (%)
24.0
26.3
28.6
30.9
33.2
35.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
27.80 28.04
27.53 27.44 27.58
28.16
29.13 28.94
28.35
27.00
Bagazo en Caña (%)
12.0
12.4
12.7
13.1
13.4
13.8
14.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
13.36
13.62
13.36
12.63
14.13
12.00
13.17
13.27
12.89 12.94
Sacarosa en Caña (%)
79.8
80.4
81.0
81.6
82.2
82.8
83.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
83.09 83.19
82.93
81.61
83.46
79.78
82.58 82.54
82.15
81.91
Pureza Aparente en Jugo Mezclado (%)
16
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
26. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: OAXACA CONSORCIO: GRUPO PROMOTORA INDUSTRIAL AZUCARERA
INGENIO: ADOLFO LÓPEZ MATEOS
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
0.18
0.19
0.20
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.24
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.24
0.23
0.19
0.22
0.18
0.21
0.18
0.20
0.22
0.18
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Indeterminadas (%)
104.9
108.5
112.1
115.6
119.2
122.8
126.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
118.14
122.22
118.08
111.58
126.38
104.90
117.74
118.53
114.34 114.81
Karbe / Tonelada de Caña Neta Teórico ( kg / t )
0.88
0.91
0.94
0.97
0.99
1.02
1.05
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.94
0.99
0.88
0.95
0.95
0.94
0.98
1.02
1.05
0.97
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Miel Final (%)
0.47
0.49
0.51
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.57
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.49
0.49
0.48
0.47
0.48
0.51
0.55 0.54
0.57
0.48
Pérdida de Sacarosa en Bagazo (%)
0.13
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.191
0.176
0.133
0.192
0.160
0.192
0.165
0.136
0.163
0.194
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Cachaza (%)
1.68
1.74
1.79
1.85
1.90
1.96
2.01
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.86
1.90
1.68
1.83
1.77
1.85
1.87
1.91
2.01
1.82
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Totales (%)
17
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
27. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: OAXACA CONSORCIO: GRUPO PROMOTORA INDUSTRIAL AZUCARERA
INGENIO: ADOLFO LÓPEZ MATEOS
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
17.8
18.3
18.8
19.4
19.9
20.4
21.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
17.76
19.33
19.63
20.73
20.86 20.95
19.96
19.19
18.83
18.36
Generación de Energía Eléctrica por Tonelada de Caña
(kwh/t)
4.1
5.3
6.4
7.5
8.6
9.7
10.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
9.09
8.17
5.68
10.86
4.23
5.64 5.61 5.74
4.15 4.30
Consumo de Petróleo Total ( Millones de Litros)
35.4
39.1
42.9
46.6
50.4
54.1
57.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
45.2
47.2
35.4
42.4
40.2
47.3
57.9
52.3
47.9
51.0
Miel Final 85° Brix Producida ( Miles de Toneladas )
7.6
9.4
11.1
12.9
14.7
16.5
18.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
15.24
18.25
14.94
18.23
7.59
10.76
11.86
9.66
12.95
10.90
Tiempo Perdido Total (%)
0.4
2.0
3.7
5.3
7.0
8.6
10.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
5.41
2.50 2.76
10.30
1.64
6.32
4.10
0.36
4.61
2.38
Tiempo Perdido por Lluvia (%)
0.530
0.539
0.547
0.555
0.563
0.572
0.580
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.580
0.572 0.572
0.577
0.580
0.533
0.530
0.544
0.557
0.541
Consumo de Vapor en Kilogramos por Kilogramos de Caña
18
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
28. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: SAN LUIS POTOSÍ CONSORCIO: SANTOS
INGENIO: ALIANZA POPULAR
Z A F R A S
INICIO DE MOLIENDA
FIN DE MOLIENDA
NÚMERO DE DÍAS DE ZAFRA
HORAS DE ZAFRA
FECHA
FECHA
DÍA
h
05/11/2015 12/11/2014 09/12/2013
03/06/2016 18/06/2015 03/07/2014
211 206218
4,9395,2415,073
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA (SEMANA DE MAYOR MOLIENDA EN ZAFRA)
CAÑA MOLIDA POR DÍA DE ZAFRA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA POR VEINTICUATRO
IMBIBICIÓN PORCIENTO CAÑA
EXTRACCIÓN DE JUGO MEZCLADO % CAÑA
t
t
t
t
t
%
%
1,091,7551,159,3821,174,524
49,60049,06047,235
5,3005,3185,566
309295283
7,4227,0886,797
22.68527.16529.938
97.296102.491103.208
04/11/2012 16/12/2011 28/11/2010 10/12/2009 25/01/2009 11/11/2007 14/12/2006
23/06/200708/06/200826/05/200903/05/201023/04/201101/04/201207/06/2013
190210122144147107216
4,5695,0442,9193,4573,5192,5635,176
952,5611,073,013625,030701,275893,914574,6421,227,063
44,80045,70040,30046,94051,10046,25050,350
5,0135,1105,1234,8706,0815,3705,681
274294274284284273303
6,5767,0606,5726,8106,8166,5487,280
27.03929.10230.05827.27830.84229.22826.320
98.65592.62988.70793.81998.33997.31697.380
EXTRACCIÓN POL % POL CAÑA % 94.1991.5488.7992.7692.9193.3893.6494.6795.7495.64
EXTRACCIÓN REDUCIDA A 12.5 % EN CAÑA % 94.0593.7592.5094.1794.2894.5094.1194.8196.0095.89
JUGO MEZCLADO t 939,748993,925554,444657,926879,064559,2161,194,9191,062,2291,188,2641,212,198
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA REFINADA t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA ESTANDAR t 101,603130,08576,00178,602115,46064,435148,468130,121129,961140,597
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA BLANCO ESPECIAL t 0 000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA MASCABADO t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL t 101,603130,08576,00178,602115,46064,435148,468130,121129,961140,597
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL (SEMANA DE MAYOR PROD. EN ZAFRA) t 6,0546,0545,2475,5216,7315,4676,0646,2016,0366,428
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL BASE ESTÁNDAR t 101,783130,35076,13178,786115,69564,548148,791130,390130,193140,775
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL POR DÍA t 535619623546785602687632596666
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX PRODUCIDA t 30,54937,47919,75821,23530,57418,65243,78334,44134,25738,472
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX POR TONELADA DE CAÑA kg 32.07034.92931.61130.28034.20232.45835.68131.54629.54832.755
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX APORT. A FCA. DE ALCOHOL t 0000000000
ALCOHOL 96° PRODUCIDO l 0000000000
ALCOHOL / MIEL FINAL A 85° BRIX APORTADA l 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
CAMPO
CAÑA MOLIDA NETA
SUPERFICIE DE CAÑA COSECHADA
FRENTES DE CORTE
CORTADORES
CAÑA QUEMADA *
CAÑA COSECHADA MECÁNICAMENTE
CAÑA ALZADA MECÁNICAMENTE
VEHÍCULOS DE ACARREO *
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA BRUTA TEÓRICO
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA TEÓRICO
PRECIO DE REF. DEL AZÚCAR PARA PAGO DE LA
CAÑAPRECIO POR TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA
t
ha
Número
Persona
%
%
%
Camión
kg
kg
$
$
916,6641,027,558599,118674,760859,729552,0751,180,3151,052,3301,112,9341,127,909
17,91318,30814,42718,18817,67715,99819,13519,85620,36721,636
33353725342926313231
1,4881,6881,6231,4481,8661,7231,8711,9451,7571,886
100.00093.77995.91292.45291.46188.97891.11894.74392.80791.721
15.83418.98415.69212.55712.21911.88910.3888.24913.73613.249
83.32384.56382.20486.90283.80485.08787.04184.55584.34084.133
281326276239328288342357330359
113.007121.299123.560113.574129.297114.202123.985123.550111.844120.528
117.432126.665128.904118.037134.438118.871128.896128.179116.512125.510
6,356.455,996.136,579.2110,222.2610,368.5810,617.726,633.357,099.838,130.659,860.00
425.48432.91483.41687.76794.54719.42487.36518.73539.97705.39
MOLIENDA Y PRODUCCIÓN
-3.21
-3.21
1.31
-3.72
-4.10
4.67
-4.10
10.21
0.70
-0.11
-0.11
2.01
0.00
8.18
0.00
0.00
8.18
6.49
8.13
11.77
12.30
10.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
6.23
-3.13
7.34
-1.17
-3.55
-0.25
8.79
7.76
7.72
21.27
30.63
VALOR MÁXIMO
VALOR MÍNIMO
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
19
29. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: SAN LUIS POTOSÍ CONSORCIO: SANTOS
INGENIO: ALIANZA POPULAR
Z A F R A S
PARÁMETROS DE EFICIENCIA
EFICIENCIA EN FÁBRICA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA POR HECTÁREA
RENDIMIENTO EN FÁBRICA
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA POR HECTÁREA
FIBRA EN CAÑA *
%
t
%
t
%
80.71183.31982.01183.30284.66682.19582.50982.56784.87084.915
53594339513664555754
10.66612.12312.16011.20912.91611.21312.09911.91911.20911.971
6754748766
12.24016.20017.60015.06315.04914.65613.36212.78513.20013.161
POL (SACAROSA) EN CAÑA
PUREZA APARENTE EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BAGAZO OBTENIDO *
BAGAZO EN CAÑA *
HUMEDAD EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) ENVASADA
SÓLIDOS EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BRIX EN JUGO MEZCLADO
POL (SACAROSA) EN JUGO MEZCLADO
%
%
t
%
%
%
%
t
%
%
BAGAZO EMPACADO (VENDIDO) t
13.15914.49014.76013.40615.19513.58414.60814.37813.15214.068
84.73185.14087.00085.74886.49283.97684.04885.45184.18485.382
270,376391,356258,457234,642290,551183,382355,107277,191286,064313,955
28.38436.47241.35133.45932.50331.91328.94025.38924.67426.730
53.47051.45052.56051.34049.60050.53049.78045.91043.67047.790
2.6943.3614.0012.9003.3162.8163.2093.0162.2712.295
10.62112.07512.10711.16712.86511.16512.05311.87111.16211.914
139,343167,19994,179101,702145,90686,804199,714173,916173,413185,086
14.82816.82216.98615.45816.59815.52216.71416.37314.59415.269
12.56414.32214.77713.25514.35613.03514.04713.99112.28613.037
00013,04919,1495,18010,9909,1894,3480
PÉRDIDAS DE SACAROSA
PÉRDIDAS EN BAGAZO *
PÉRDIDAS EN MIEL FINAL PROD. Y EST. *
PÉRDIDAS EN CACHAZA *
PÉRDIDAS INDETERMINADAS *
PÉRDIDAS TOTALES *
%
%
%
%
%
0.7651.2261.6550.9701.0780.8990.9290.7660.5600.613
1.0900.9980.8620.9821.0011.0481.1121.0670.9421.067
0.1430.0630.0550.1270.0770.1290.1330.1640.1630.147
0.5410.1300.0840.1590.1750.3430.3820.5100.3240.326
2.5382.4172.6562.2382.3302.4192.5552.5071.9902.155
GENERACIÓN Y CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA
GENERACIÓN DE VAPOR
CONSUMO DE VAPOR POR KILOGRAMO DE CAÑA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA / T DE CAÑA
CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA CFE *
t
kg
kW.h
kW.h
kW.h
652,719651,851412,097449,486509,604375,461709,911633,235692,484693,715
1,378,6681,089,515523,718909,930822,220568,2601,156,2252,147,7752,138,2402,942,170
0.6850.6070.6590.6410.5700.6530.5790.5800.5970.591
13,117,59214,076,5959,028,76811,829,83914,593,80610,555,21421,082,75917,593,58619,688,03320,329,829
13.77113.11914.44516.86916.32618.36817.18116.11516.98117.309
CONSUMO DE PETRÓLEO
PETRÓLEO EN PRUEBAS *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA *
PETRÓLEO EN LIQUIDACIÓN *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA DE ALCOHOL *
PETRÓLEO TOTAL *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE CAÑA *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE AZÚCAR *
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
2,910,1421,087,7831,044,001791,90994,28800000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0000000000
2,910,142.0001,087,783.0001,044,001.000791,909.00094,288.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
3.0551.0141.6701.1290.1050.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
28.6428.36213.73710.0750.8170.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
RESUMEN DE TIEMPOS PERDIDOS
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN FÁBRICA *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR PERSONAL *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR DÍAS FESTIVOS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN CAMPO *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR LLUVIAS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO TOTAL *
7.5410.4311.671.816.523.4911.9811.272.976.10%
%
%
%
%
%
1.880.350.210.050.120.001.260.570.320.81
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
2.3416.098.147.331.501.911.771.452.954.50
12.140.781.7819.312.4212.426.8315.2318.856.83
23.9127.6521.8128.5010.5517.8221.8428.5225.1018.25
0.05
-4.64
6.79
1.84
-0.30
6.96
1.42
9.75
8.33
9.43
1.07
6.73
6.73
4.62
6.11
-100.00
9.49
13.28
-9.73
0.68
8.28
0.18
-1.11
3.26
1.93
37.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
105.26
153.20
0.00
52.58
-63.75
-27.28
VALOR MÍNIMO
VALOR MÁXIMO
20
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
30. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SAN LUIS POTOSÍ CONSORCIO: SANTOS
INGENIO: ALIANZA POPULAR
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
4.0
4.6
5.3
5.9
6.5
7.1
7.8
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
5.67
7.11
5.27
4.32
6.53
4.03
7.76
6.55
6.38
6.50
Azúcar Producida por Hectárea ( t/ha )
14.4
15.6
16.8
18.0
19.2
20.4
21.6
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
17.91
18.31
14.43
18.19
17.68
16.00
19.13
19.86
20.37
21.64
Superficie de Caña Cosechada ( Miles de hectáreas )
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.95
1.07
0.63
0.70
0.89
0.57
1.23
1.09
1.16 1.17
Caña Molida Bruta (Millones de toneladas)
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.15
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.10
0.13
0.08
0.08
0.12
0.06
0.15
0.13 0.13
0.14
Azúcar Producida Total (Millones de toneladas )
10.7
11.0
11.4
11.8
12.2
12.5
12.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
10.67
12.12 12.16
11.21
12.92
11.21
12.10
11.92
11.21
11.97
Rendimiento en Fábrica (%)
35.9
40.6
45.3
50.0
54.7
59.4
64.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
53.18
58.61
43.32
38.56
50.57
35.92
64.13
54.98
56.93
54.28
Caña Molida Bruta por Hectárea ( t/ha )
21
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
31. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SAN LUIS POTOSÍ CONSORCIO: SANTOS
INGENIO: ALIANZA POPULAR
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
80.7
81.4
82.1
82.8
83.5
84.2
84.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
80.71
83.32
82.01
83.30
84.67
82.19
82.51 82.57
84.87 84.92
Eficiencia en Fábrica (%)
8.2
10.0
11.8
13.6
15.4
17.2
19.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
15.83
18.98
15.69
12.56
12.22
11.89
10.39
8.25
13.74
13.25
Caña Cosechada Mecánicamente (%)
89.0
90.8
92.7
94.5
96.3
98.2
100.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
100.00
93.78
95.91
92.45
91.46
88.98
91.12
94.74
92.81
91.72
Caña Quemada (%)
24.0
26.3
28.6
30.9
33.2
35.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
28.38
36.47 41.35
33.46
32.50
31.91
28.94
25.39
24.67
26.73
Bagazo en Caña (%)
13.2
13.5
13.8
14.2
14.5
14.9
15.2
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
13.16
14.49
14.76
13.41
15.20
13.58
14.61
14.38
13.15
14.07
Sacarosa en Caña (%)
84.0
84.5
85.0
85.5
86.0
86.5
87.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
84.73
85.14
87.00
85.75
86.49
83.98 84.05
85.45
84.18
85.38
Pureza Aparente en Jugo Mezclado (%)
22
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
32. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SAN LUIS POTOSÍ CONSORCIO: SANTOS
INGENIO: ALIANZA POPULAR
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
0.08
0.16
0.24
0.31
0.39
0.46
0.54
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.54
0.13
0.08
0.16
0.17
0.34
0.38
0.51
0.32 0.33
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Indeterminadas (%)
116.5
119.5
122.5
125.5
128.5
131.5
134.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
117.43
126.67
128.90
118.04
134.44
118.87
128.90
128.18
116.51
125.51
Karbe / Tonelada de Caña Neta Teórico ( kg / t )
0.86
0.90
0.95
0.99
1.03
1.07
1.11
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.09
1.00
0.86
0.98
1.00
1.05
1.11
1.07
0.94
1.07
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Miel Final (%)
0.6
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.76
1.23
1.65
0.97
1.08
0.90 0.93
0.77
0.56
0.61
Pérdida de Sacarosa en Bagazo (%)
0.06
0.07
0.09
0.11
0.13
0.15
0.16
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.143
0.063
0.055
0.127
0.077
0.129
0.133
0.164 0.163
0.147
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Cachaza (%)
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.7
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2.54
2.42
2.66
2.24
2.33
2.42
2.56
2.51
1.99
2.15
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Totales (%)
23
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
33. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SAN LUIS POTOSÍ CONSORCIO: SANTOS
INGENIO: ALIANZA POPULAR
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
13.1
14.0
14.9
15.7
16.6
17.5
18.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
13.77
13.12
14.45
16.87
16.33
18.37
17.18
16.11
16.98
17.31
Generación de Energía Eléctrica por Tonelada de Caña
(kwh/t)
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
1.9
2.4
2.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2.91
1.09 1.04
0.79
0.09
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumo de Petróleo Total ( Millones de Litros)
18.7
22.8
27.0
31.2
35.4
39.6
43.8
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
30.5
37.5
19.8
21.2
30.6
18.7
43.8
34.4 34.3
38.5
Miel Final 85° Brix Producida ( Miles de Toneladas )
10.6
13.5
16.5
19.5
22.5
25.5
28.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
23.91
27.65
21.81
28.50
10.55
17.82
21.84
28.52
25.10
18.25
Tiempo Perdido Total (%)
0.78
3.87
6.96
10.05
13.14
16.22
19.31
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
12.14
0.78
1.78
19.31
2.42
12.42
6.83
15.23
18.85
6.83
Tiempo Perdido por Lluvia (%)
0.57
0.59
0.61
0.63
0.65
0.67
0.69
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.685
0.607
0.659
0.641
0.570
0.653
0.579 0.580
0.597
0.591
Consumo de Vapor en Kilogramos por Kilogramos de Caña
24
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
34. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: PUEBLA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: ATENCINGO
Z A F R A S
INICIO DE MOLIENDA
FIN DE MOLIENDA
NÚMERO DE DÍAS DE ZAFRA
HORAS DE ZAFRA
FECHA
FECHA
DÍA
h
11/11/2015 05/11/2014 20/11/2013
21/05/2016 02/05/2015 04/06/2014
191 196178
4,7124,2694,586
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA (SEMANA DE MAYOR MOLIENDA EN ZAFRA)
CAÑA MOLIDA POR DÍA DE ZAFRA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA POR VEINTICUATRO
IMBIBICIÓN PORCIENTO CAÑA
EXTRACCIÓN DE JUGO MEZCLADO % CAÑA
t
t
t
t
t
%
%
1,864,9581,720,7501,810,879
71,05572,80075,369
9,5159,6679,481
426431439
10,23210,34610,526
24.32423.71724.979
96.40595.43996.680
03/11/2012 16/11/2011 22/11/2010 19/11/2009 29/11/2008 14/12/2007 07/12/2006
28/05/200721/05/200803/05/200904/05/201009/05/201129/05/201222/05/2013
172159155166169195200
4,1183,8043,7233,9774,0484,6854,796
1,529,5391,462,9391,443,0951,440,5971,488,3071,724,3361,887,603
70,47070,90071,51067,57068,43566,44471,810
8,8939,2019,3108,6788,8078,8439,438
416427420404394408418
9,97310,25310,0759,7019,4459,79410,042
23.08021.54921.85920.76524.15924.82123.534
95.42293.24594.22192.98995.44596.82596.231
EXTRACCIÓN POL % POL CAÑA % 94.8994.7794.7994.0393.8194.9094.9594.8194.9495.15
EXTRACCIÓN REDUCIDA A 12.5 % EN CAÑA % 94.9394.8694.8193.9993.9894.9694.9194.8995.0895.32
JUGO MEZCLADO t 1,459,5121,364,1231,359,7011,339,5981,420,5171,669,5941,816,4681,797,9181,642,2581,750,758
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA REFINADA t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA ESTANDAR t 195,358188,878186,571179,579192,400226,804240,595240,736219,434228,797
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA BLANCO ESPECIAL t 0 000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA MASCABADO t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL t 195,358188,878186,571179,579192,400226,804240,595240,736219,434228,797
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL (SEMANA DE MAYOR PROD. EN ZAFRA) t 9,5049,5049,6408,9728,8218,9759,3969,7439,7979,636
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL BASE ESTÁNDAR t 195,585189,124186,812179,781192,644227,098240,995241,084219,737228,967
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL POR DÍA t 1,1361,1881,2041,0821,1381,1631,2031,2281,2331,198
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX PRODUCIDA t 60,22657,79257,55953,03360,20165,33874,91275,40466,52571,504
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX POR TONELADA DE CAÑA kg 39.37539.50439.88636.81340.44937.89239.68640.43238.66139.486
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX APORT. A FCA. DE ALCOHOL t 0000000000
ALCOHOL 96° PRODUCIDO l 0000000000
ALCOHOL / MIEL FINAL A 85° BRIX APORTADA l 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
CAMPO
CAÑA MOLIDA NETA
SUPERFICIE DE CAÑA COSECHADA
FRENTES DE CORTE
CORTADORES
CAÑA QUEMADA *
CAÑA COSECHADA MECÁNICAMENTE
CAÑA ALZADA MECÁNICAMENTE
VEHÍCULOS DE ACARREO *
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA BRUTA TEÓRICO
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA TEÓRICO
PRECIO DE REF. DEL AZÚCAR PARA PAGO DE LA
CAÑAPRECIO POR TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA
t
ha
Número
Persona
%
%
%
Camión
kg
kg
$
$
1,517,9381,454,2091,420,9321,418,8891,468,1161,701,0211,861,8171,838,9741,699,0351,790,833
13,22312,89513,24713,02313,76814,28415,61615,84315,26415,382
31323132313131323232
1,7801,7451,7161,7641,9461,9021,9862,0482,0631,992
100.000100.000100.000100.00092.80093.76895.11196.14198.88999.610
15.33513.86213.79410.0938.1819.2229.0247.9501.6410.704
100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000
694703729697712686708717727717
128.307130.537130.999125.261131.398131.215127.862130.550128.100127.014
129.288131.321133.042127.177133.205133.013129.633132.394129.738128.435
6,356.455,996.136,579.2110,222.2610,368.5810,617.726,633.357,099.838,130.659,860.00
468.43448.83498.93741.02787.25805.01490.14535.79601.27721.83
MOLIENDA Y PRODUCCIÓN
7.30
7.43
5.24
3.53
1.74
-1.92
1.74
5.32
1.30
0.23
0.25
6.61
0.00
4.27
0.00
0.00
4.27
-1.65
4.20
-2.83
7.48
2.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.40
0.77
0.00
-3.44
0.73
-57.10
0.00
-1.38
-0.85
-1.00
21.27
20.05
VALOR MÁXIMO
VALOR MÍNIMO
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
25
35. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: PUEBLA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: ATENCINGO
Z A F R A S
PARÁMETROS DE EFICIENCIA
EFICIENCIA EN FÁBRICA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA POR HECTÁREA
RENDIMIENTO EN FÁBRICA
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA POR HECTÁREA
FIBRA EN CAÑA *
%
t
%
t
%
84.11883.85183.58783.97483.14185.28084.75884.12784.65684.255
116113109111108121121118113118
12.77212.91112.92912.46612.92713.15312.74612.90812.75212.635
15151414141615151415
12.58012.69012.54012.42212.80412.62612.42712.68212.82112.894
POL (SACAROSA) EN CAÑA
PUREZA APARENTE EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BAGAZO OBTENIDO *
BAGAZO EN CAÑA *
HUMEDAD EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) ENVASADA
SÓLIDOS EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BRIX EN JUGO MEZCLADO
POL (SACAROSA) EN JUGO MEZCLADO
%
%
t
%
%
%
%
t
%
%
BAGAZO EMPACADO (VENDIDO) t
15.11015.32015.39014.77215.47515.35114.97315.27414.99414.917
83.26583.94083.61082.87883.49984.38684.01184.43984.52284.049
423,045414,065398,841400,139427,349482,740515,364520,672486,602512,461
27.65828.30427.63827.77628.71427.99627.30227.91928.27928.299
50.71051.32050.64050.93050.86051.02050.67050.70050.92050.884
2.7892.8332.9023.1763.3362.7982.7722.8412.6852.556
12.71012.85012.86812.40512.86613.09112.69112.84912.69312.568
263,397253,115251,845241,435258,760297,672319,411319,829289,796305,806
18.04718.55518.52218.02318.21617.82917.58417.78917.64617.467
15.02715.57515.48714.93715.21015.04514.77315.02114.91514.681
00000009,26200
PÉRDIDAS DE SACAROSA
PÉRDIDAS EN BAGAZO *
PÉRDIDAS EN MIEL FINAL PROD. Y EST. *
PÉRDIDAS EN CACHAZA *
PÉRDIDAS INDETERMINADAS *
PÉRDIDAS TOTALES *
%
%
%
%
%
0.7710.8020.8020.8820.9580.7830.7570.7930.7590.723
1.3401.3801.4181.1731.3551.2511.2891.3471.2931.335
0.0660.0690.0750.0670.0820.0650.0660.0620.0500.056
0.2220.2240.2310.2450.2130.1600.1700.2220.1990.234
2.4002.4752.5272.3672.6092.2602.2822.4242.3012.349
GENERACIÓN Y CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA
GENERACIÓN DE VAPOR
CONSUMO DE VAPOR POR KILOGRAMO DE CAÑA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA / T DE CAÑA
CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA CFE *
t
kg
kW.h
kW.h
kW.h
868,275787,738618,498688,501724,185813,144868,648849,939770,911861,043
83,12563,175148,873455,94068,950126,00092,890110,42584,525120,925
0.5680.5380.4290.4780.4870.4720.4600.4560.4480.475
25,381,67524,273,30024,254,60024,001,57325,013,90029,224,40031,270,70031,021,70028,657,70031,248,900
16.59416.59216.80716.66116.80716.94816.56616.63416.65417.256
CONSUMO DE PETRÓLEO
PETRÓLEO EN PRUEBAS *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA *
PETRÓLEO EN LIQUIDACIÓN *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA DE ALCOHOL *
PETRÓLEO TOTAL *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE CAÑA *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE AZÚCAR *
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
375,463.000398,314.000231,501.000370,000.000230,855.000163,291.000155,134.000163,076.0000.0000.000
4,040,5652,507,8181,541,3281,400,861516,5911,073,491545,531145,67400
621,653.00091,214.00019,011.00022,359.0000.00073,875.00046,606.00013,593.0000.0000.000
0000000000
5,037,681.0002,997,346.0001,791,840.0001,793,220.000747,446.0001,310,657.000747,271.000322,343.0000.0000.000
2.6421.7141.0680.9720.3470.6230.2890.0780.0000.000
20.68313.2778.2617.8012.6854.7332.2670.6050.0000.000
RESUMEN DE TIEMPOS PERDIDOS
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN FÁBRICA *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR PERSONAL *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR DÍAS FESTIVOS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN CAMPO *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR LLUVIAS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO TOTAL *
5.596.445.674.404.436.874.244.424.514.27%
%
%
%
%
%
2.611.881.032.701.872.400.850.910.900.87
1.270.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
0.641.250.970.440.270.390.350.370.741.37
0.500.410.002.840.000.140.491.460.343.46
10.619.987.6610.386.579.805.937.156.509.97
-0.47
4.43
-0.92
3.47
0.57
-0.51
-0.56
5.31
0.07
-0.07
-4.82
-0.99
5.52
-1.02
-1.57
0.00
-4.75
3.23
13.21
17.95
2.08
11.69
6.13
9.04
3.61
43.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-5.42
-3.49
0.00
84.22
913.86
53.43
VALOR MÍNIMO
VALOR MÁXIMO
26
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
36. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: PUEBLA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: ATENCINGO
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
13.8
14.1
14.5
14.8
15.2
15.5
15.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
14.77
14.65
14.08
13.79
13.97
15.88
15.41
15.20
14.38
14.87
Azúcar Producida por Hectárea ( t/ha )
12.9
13.4
13.9
14.4
14.9
15.4
15.8
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
13.22
12.89
13.25
13.02
13.77
14.28
15.62
15.84
15.26
15.38
Superficie de Caña Cosechada ( Miles de hectáreas )
1.44
1.52
1.59
1.66
1.74
1.81
1.89
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.53
1.46
1.44 1.44
1.49
1.72
1.89
1.86
1.72
1.81
Caña Molida Bruta (Millones de toneladas)
0.18
0.19
0.20
0.21
0.22
0.23
0.24
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.18
0.19
0.23
0.24 0.24
0.22
0.23
Azúcar Producida Total (Millones de toneladas )
12.5
12.6
12.7
12.8
12.9
13.0
13.2
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
12.77
12.91 12.93
12.47
12.93
13.15
12.75
12.91
12.75
12.63
Rendimiento en Fábrica (%)
108.1
110.2
112.4
114.5
116.6
118.7
120.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
115.68
113.45
108.94
110.62
108.10
120.72 120.88
117.72
112.73
117.72
Caña Molida Bruta por Hectárea ( t/ha )
27
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
37. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: PUEBLA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: ATENCINGO
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
83.1
83.5
83.9
84.2
84.6
84.9
85.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
84.12
83.85
83.59
83.97
83.14
85.28
84.76
84.13
84.66
84.25
Eficiencia en Fábrica (%)
0.7
3.1
5.6
8.0
10.5
12.9
15.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
15.34
13.86 13.79
10.09
8.18
9.22 9.02
7.95
1.64
0.70
Caña Cosechada Mecánicamente (%)
92.8
94.0
95.2
96.4
97.6
98.8
100.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
92.80
93.77
95.11
96.14
98.89
99.61
Caña Quemada (%)
24.0
26.3
28.6
30.9
33.2
35.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
27.66
28.30
27.64 27.78
28.71
28.00
27.30
27.92
28.28 28.30
Bagazo en Caña (%)
14.8
14.9
15.0
15.1
15.2
15.4
15.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
15.11
15.32
15.39
14.77
15.48
15.35
14.97
15.27
14.99
14.92
Sacarosa en Caña (%)
82.9
83.2
83.4
83.7
84.0
84.2
84.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
83.27
83.94
83.61
82.88
83.50
84.39
84.01
84.44
84.52
84.05
Pureza Aparente en Jugo Mezclado (%)
28
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
38. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: PUEBLA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: ATENCINGO
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
0.16
0.17
0.19
0.20
0.22
0.23
0.25
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.22 0.22
0.23
0.25
0.21
0.16
0.17
0.22
0.20
0.23
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Indeterminadas (%)
127.177
128.182
129.186
130.191
131.196
132.200
133.205
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
129.29
131.32
133.04
127.18
133.21
133.01
129.63
132.39
129.74
128.44
Karbe / Tonelada de Caña Neta Teórico ( kg / t )
1.17
1.21
1.25
1.30
1.34
1.38
1.42
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.34
1.38
1.42
1.17
1.36
1.25
1.29
1.35
1.29
1.33
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Miel Final (%)
0.72
0.76
0.80
0.84
0.88
0.92
0.96
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.77
0.80 0.80
0.88
0.96
0.78
0.76
0.79
0.76
0.72
Pérdida de Sacarosa en Bagazo (%)
0.050
0.055
0.060
0.066
0.071
0.077
0.082
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.066
0.069
0.075
0.067
0.082
0.065
0.066
0.062
0.050
0.056
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Cachaza (%)
2.26
2.32
2.38
2.43
2.49
2.55
2.61
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2.40
2.47
2.53
2.37
2.61
2.26
2.28
2.42
2.30
2.35
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Totales (%)
29
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
39. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: PUEBLA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: ATENCINGO
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
16.6
16.7
16.8
16.9
17.0
17.1
17.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
16.59 16.59
16.81
16.66
16.81
16.95
16.57
16.63 16.65
17.26
Generación de Energía Eléctrica por Tonelada de Caña
(kwh/t)
0
0.8
1.7
2.5
3.4
4.2
5.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
5.04
3.00
1.79 1.79
0.75
1.31
0.75
0.32
0.00 0.00
Consumo de Petróleo Total ( Millones de Litros)
53.0
56.8
60.5
64.2
67.9
71.7
75.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
60.2
57.8 57.6
53.0
60.2
65.3
74.9 75.4
66.5
71.5
Miel Final 85° Brix Producida ( Miles de Toneladas )
5.9
6.7
7.5
8.3
9.1
9.8
10.6
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
10.61
9.98
7.66
10.38
6.57
9.80
5.93
7.15
6.50
9.97
Tiempo Perdido Total (%)
0.0
0.6
1.2
1.7
2.3
2.9
3.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.50 0.41
0.00
2.84
0.00
0.14
0.49
1.46
0.34
3.46
Tiempo Perdido por Lluvia (%)
0.43
0.45
0.47
0.50
0.52
0.54
0.57
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.568
0.538
0.429
0.478
0.487
0.472
0.460
0.456
0.448
0.475
Consumo de Vapor en Kilogramos por Kilogramos de Caña
30
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
40. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: SINALOA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: AVANCE REGIONAL (LA PRIMAVERA)
Z A F R A S
INICIO DE MOLIENDA
FIN DE MOLIENDA
NÚMERO DE DÍAS DE ZAFRA
HORAS DE ZAFRA
FECHA
FECHA
DÍA
h
01/01/1900 01/01/1900 01/01/1900
01/01/1900 01/01/1900 01/01/1900
0 00
000
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA (SEMANA DE MAYOR MOLIENDA EN ZAFRA)
CAÑA MOLIDA POR DÍA DE ZAFRA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA POR VEINTICUATRO
IMBIBICIÓN PORCIENTO CAÑA
EXTRACCIÓN DE JUGO MEZCLADO % CAÑA
t
t
t
t
t
%
%
000
000
000
000
000
0.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.000
11/01/2013 15/01/2012 10/01/2011 14/01/2010 09/01/2009 12/01/2008 29/01/2007
01/06/200724/04/200807/04/200913/03/201008/03/201131/03/201222/03/2013
1231038858577670
2,9472,4632,1111,3831,3731,8201,689
674,942551,701525,091305,526356,005442,015412,755
48,39046,71145,31046,44746,83745,73545,008
5,4875,3565,9675,2686,2465,8165,896
279272290292292280269
6,7086,5256,9667,0087,0176,7176,452
20.12620.11220.95620.78522.19724.41424.942
92.04491.99792.52893.59693.96395.39394.177
EXTRACCIÓN POL % POL CAÑA % 93.9594.0893.6594.7094.3193.8694.400.000.000.00
EXTRACCIÓN REDUCIDA A 12.5 % EN CAÑA % 94.2194.3793.9294.7694.6294.3495.270.000.000.00
JUGO MEZCLADO t 621,246507,549485,857285,959334,514421,649388,721000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA REFINADA t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA ESTANDAR t 59,59650,51649,24128,15634,33838,16537,433000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA BLANCO ESPECIAL t 0 000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA MASCABADO t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL t 59,59650,51649,24128,15634,33838,16537,433000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL (SEMANA DE MAYOR PROD. EN ZAFRA) t 4,6584,6584,3474,3685,0884,0714,381000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL BASE ESTÁNDAR t 59,62450,52749,26328,16934,34938,17937,449000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL POR DÍA t 485490560485602502535000
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX PRODUCIDA t 20,93418,90416,8939,07510,93315,45814,089000
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX POR TONELADA DE CAÑA kg 31.01734.26632.17229.70430.71034.97234.1330.0000.0000.000
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX APORT. A FCA. DE ALCOHOL t 0000000000
ALCOHOL 96° PRODUCIDO l 0000000000
ALCOHOL / MIEL FINAL A 85° BRIX APORTADA l 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
CAMPO
CAÑA MOLIDA NETA
SUPERFICIE DE CAÑA COSECHADA
FRENTES DE CORTE
CORTADORES
CAÑA QUEMADA *
CAÑA COSECHADA MECÁNICAMENTE
CAÑA ALZADA MECÁNICAMENTE
VEHÍCULOS DE ACARREO *
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA BRUTA TEÓRICO
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA TEÓRICO
PRECIO DE REF. DEL AZÚCAR PARA PAGO DE LA
CAÑAPRECIO POR TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA
t
ha
Número
Persona
%
%
%
Camión
kg
kg
$
$
642,309518,436497,139289,865337,640420,067390,693000
5,9265,7254,4083,7474,1995,7615,909000
5555555000
164133203271284307280000
100.00015.160100.000100.000100.00099.646100.0000.0000.0000.000
100.000100.000100.000100.000100.00099.646100.0000.0000.0000.000
100.000100.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
506000020000
87.97291.20292.60191.85495.74386.40990.8810.0000.0000.000
92.44297.05497.80896.817100.95190.92496.0130.0000.0000.000
6,356.455,996.136,579.2110,222.2610,368.5810,617.726,633.350.000.000.00
334.93331.71366.79564.12596.63550.28363.030.000.000.00
MOLIENDA Y PRODUCCIÓN
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
VALOR MÁXIMO
VALOR MÍNIMO
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
31
41. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: SINALOA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: AVANCE REGIONAL (LA PRIMAVERA)
Z A F R A S
PARÁMETROS DE EFICIENCIA
EFICIENCIA EN FÁBRICA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA POR HECTÁREA
RENDIMIENTO EN FÁBRICA
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA POR HECTÁREA
FIBRA EN CAÑA *
%
t
%
t
%
82.63182.20683.16683.31183.54981.24781.9220.0000.0000.000
1149611982857770000
8.8309.1569.3789.2169.6458.6349.0690.0000.0000.000
109118876000
13.00013.04012.98012.60013.12013.41514.4720.0000.0000.000
POL (SACAROSA) EN CAÑA
PUREZA APARENTE EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BAGAZO OBTENIDO *
BAGAZO EN CAÑA *
HUMEDAD EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) EN BAGAZO *
POL (SACAROSA) ENVASADA
SÓLIDOS EN JUGO MEZCLADO
BRIX EN JUGO MEZCLADO
POL (SACAROSA) EN JUGO MEZCLADO
%
%
t
%
%
%
%
t
%
%
BAGAZO EMPACADO (VENDIDO) t
10.62711.07411.21311.00011.47910.56811.0090.0000.0000.000
79.85479.16079.49080.72081.07078.51680.9370.0000.0000.000
189,535155,110149,27283,070100,514128,279126,983000
28.08228.14228.42727.18928.23429.03330.7650.0000.0000.000
50.50050.46050.87050.47050.53050.70050.2650.0000.0000.000
2.2902.3302.5052.1422.3122.2372.0040.0000.0000.000
8.7819.1039.3269.1649.5918.5869.0190.0000.0000.000
84,38572,61669,36639,43347,54455,83452,997000
13.58314.30714.27713.79014.21313.24213.6340.0000.0000.000
10.84711.32511.34911.13111.52210.39711.0350.0000.0000.000
0000000000
PÉRDIDAS DE SACAROSA
PÉRDIDAS EN BAGAZO *
PÉRDIDAS EN MIEL FINAL PROD. Y EST. *
PÉRDIDAS EN CACHAZA *
PÉRDIDAS INDETERMINADAS *
PÉRDIDAS TOTALES *
%
%
%
%
%
0.6430.6550.7120.5830.6530.6490.6160.0000.0000.000
0.9741.0810.9860.9830.9921.0821.1500.0000.0000.000
0.0680.0530.0560.0770.0650.0590.0840.0000.0000.000
0.1600.1820.1340.1940.1780.1920.1390.0000.0000.000
1.8461.9711.8881.8361.8881.9821.9900.0000.0000.000
GENERACIÓN Y CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA
GENERACIÓN DE VAPOR
CONSUMO DE VAPOR POR KILOGRAMO DE CAÑA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA
GENERACIÓN DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA / T DE CAÑA
CONSUMO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA CFE *
t
kg
kW.h
kW.h
kW.h
367,643293,787257,036156,346177,771242,129207,555000
1,881,3501,293,450362,800294,000775,650533,850365,700000
0.5450.5330.4900.5120.4990.5480.5030.0000.0000.000
6,364,8004,969,4005,673,1003,420,5003,587,0005,360,4505,379,500000
9.4309.00710.80411.19510.07612.12713.0330.0000.0000.000
CONSUMO DE PETRÓLEO
PETRÓLEO EN PRUEBAS *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA *
PETRÓLEO EN LIQUIDACIÓN *
PETRÓLEO EN FÁBRICA DE ALCOHOL *
PETRÓLEO TOTAL *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE CAÑA *
PETRÓLEO EN FCA. POR T DE AZÚCAR *
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
2,446,541681,05400000000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0000000000
2,446,541.000681,054.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
3.6251.2340.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
41.05213.4820.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
RESUMEN DE TIEMPOS PERDIDOS
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN FÁBRICA *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR PERSONAL *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR DÍAS FESTIVOS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO EN CAMPO *
TIEMPO PERDIDO POR LLUVIAS *
TIEMPO PERDIDO TOTAL *
13.7911.7810.932.9810.8912.237.820.000.000.00%
%
%
%
%
%
0.040.531.180.050.050.651.090.000.000.00
3.393.720.030.000.000.000.060.000.000.00
0.841.582.160.600.380.340.130.000.000.00
0.000.000.0020.710.000.000.000.000.000.00
18.0617.6114.3124.3511.3213.229.100.000.000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
VALOR MÍNIMO
VALOR MÁXIMO
32
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
42. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SINALOA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: AVANCE REGIONAL (LA PRIMAVERA)
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
6.3
7.1
7.9
8.8
9.6
10.4
11.2
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
10.06
8.82
11.17
7.51
8.18
6.62
6.33
Azúcar Producida por Hectárea ( t/ha )
3.7
4.1
4.5
4.8
5.2
5.6
5.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
5.93
5.72
4.41
3.75
4.20
5.76
5.91
Superficie de Caña Cosechada ( Miles de hectáreas )
0.31
0.37
0.43
0.49
0.55
0.61
0.67
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.67
0.55
0.53
0.31
0.36
0.44
0.41
Caña Molida Bruta (Millones de toneladas)
0.028
0.033
0.039
0.044
0.049
0.054
0.060
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.04 0.04
Azúcar Producida Total (Millones de toneladas )
8.6
8.8
9.0
9.1
9.3
9.5
9.6
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
8.83
9.16
9.38
9.22
9.65
8.63
9.07
Rendimiento en Fábrica (%)
69.9
78.1
86.3
94.5
102.7
110.9
119.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
113.90
96.37
119.12
81.54
84.79
76.72
69.85
Caña Molida Bruta por Hectárea ( t/ha )
33
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
43. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SINALOA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: AVANCE REGIONAL (LA PRIMAVERA)
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
81.2
81.6
82.0
82.4
82.8
83.2
83.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
82.63
82.21
83.17
83.31
83.55
81.25
81.92
Eficiencia en Fábrica (%)
99.65
99.70
99.76
99.82
99.88
99.94
100.00
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
99.65
100.00
Caña Cosechada Mecánicamente (%)
15.2
29.3
43.4
57.6
71.7
85.9
100.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
100.00
15.16
100.00 100.00 100.00 99.65 100.00
Caña Quemada (%)
24.0
26.3
28.6
30.9
33.2
35.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
28.08 28.14 28.43
27.19
28.23
29.03
30.77
Bagazo en Caña (%)
10.6
10.7
10.9
11.0
11.2
11.3
11.5
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
10.63
11.07
11.21
11.00
11.48
10.57
11.01
Sacarosa en Caña (%)
78.5
78.9
79.4
79.8
80.2
80.6
81.1
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
79.85
79.16
79.49
80.72
81.07
78.52
80.94
Pureza Aparente en Jugo Mezclado (%)
34
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
44. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SINALOA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: AVANCE REGIONAL (LA PRIMAVERA)
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
0.134
0.144
0.154
0.164
0.174
0.184
0.194
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.16
0.18
0.13
0.19
0.18
0.19
0.14
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Indeterminadas (%)
90.9
92.6
94.3
95.9
97.6
99.3
101.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
92.44
97.05
97.81
96.82
100.95
90.92
96.01
Karbe / Tonelada de Caña Neta Teórico ( kg / t )
0.97
1.00
1.03
1.06
1.09
1.12
1.15
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.97
1.08
0.99 0.98
0.99
1.08
1.15
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Miel Final (%)
0.58
0.60
0.63
0.65
0.67
0.69
0.71
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.64
0.66
0.71
0.58
0.65 0.65
0.62
Pérdida de Sacarosa en Bagazo (%)
0.053
0.058
0.063
0.068
0.074
0.079
0.084
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.068
0.053
0.056
0.077
0.065
0.059
0.084
Pérdidas de Sacarosa en Cachaza (%)
1.84
1.86
1.89
1.91
1.94
1.96
1.99
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
1.85
1.97
1.89
1.84
1.89
1.98
1.99
Pérdidas de Sacarosa Totales (%)
35
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
45. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
ESTADO: SINALOA CONSORCIO: ZUCARMEX
INGENIO: AVANCE REGIONAL (LA PRIMAVERA)
COMPORTAMIENTO HISTÓRICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
9.0
9.7
10.3
11.0
11.7
12.4
13.0
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
9.43
9.01
10.80
11.20
10.08
12.13
13.03
Generación de Energía Eléctrica por Tonelada de Caña
(kwh/t)
0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
2.45
0.68
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumo de Petróleo Total ( Millones de Litros)
9.1
11.1
13.0
15.0
17.0
19.0
20.9
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
20.9
18.9
16.9
9.1
10.9
15.5
14.1
Miel Final 85° Brix Producida ( Miles de Toneladas )
9.1
11.6
14.2
16.7
19.3
21.8
24.3
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
18.06
17.61
14.31
24.35
11.32
13.22
9.10
Tiempo Perdido Total (%)
0.0
3.5
6.9
10.4
13.8
17.3
20.7
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.00 0.00 0.00
20.71
0.00 0.00 0.00
Tiempo Perdido por Lluvia (%)
0.490
0.499
0.509
0.519
0.528
0.538
0.548
2006-2007
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015
2015-2016
0.545
0.533
0.490
0.512
0.499
0.548
0.503
Consumo de Vapor en Kilogramos por Kilogramos de Caña
36
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
46. COMITÉ NACIONAL PARA EL DESARROLLO SUSTENTABLE DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR
INFORME ESTADÍSTICO DEL SECTOR AGROINDUSTRIAL DE LA CAÑA DE AZÚCAR EN MÉXICO, ZAFRAS 2006-2007 / 2015-2016
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013 2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008 2006-2007
UNIDAD DE
MEDIDA
VARIACIÓN
PORCENTUAL ***INDICADORES
ESTADO: TABASCO CONSORCIO: INDEPENDIENTES
INGENIO: AZSUREMEX
Z A F R A S
INICIO DE MOLIENDA
FIN DE MOLIENDA
NÚMERO DE DÍAS DE ZAFRA
HORAS DE ZAFRA
FECHA
FECHA
DÍA
h
26/01/2016 30/01/2015 12/01/2014
14/05/2016 11/06/2015 16/05/2014
110 124132
2,9783,1802,629
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA
CAÑA MOLIDA BRUTA (SEMANA DE MAYOR MOLIENDA EN ZAFRA)
CAÑA MOLIDA POR DÍA DE ZAFRA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA
CAÑA MOLIDA POR HORA POR VEINTICUATRO
IMBIBICIÓN PORCIENTO CAÑA
EXTRACCIÓN DE JUGO MEZCLADO % CAÑA
t
t
t
t
t
%
%
200,934159,751131,269
14,24512,50011,750
1,6201,2101,193
1039895
2,4772,3452,284
21.58924.05020.821
86.44285.86984.911
18/12/2012 16/01/2012 04/02/2011 15/01/2010 24/02/2009 09/01/2008 18/12/2006
23/05/200720/05/200803/06/200915/03/201026/04/201105/05/201225/04/2013
156132996081110128
3,7453,1702,3761,4291,9442,6433,076
224,933191,102161,562134,091122,682169,915194,610
15,61612,58114,25813,66112,99113,10013,900
1,4421,4481,6322,2351,5151,5451,520
1071071061049398107
2,5762,5652,5532,4932,2352,3602,568
17.82814.75016.18020.35020.01022.62020.584
87.16886.31579.74362.10786.41791.06883.938
EXTRACCIÓN POL % POL CAÑA % 89.3390.3686.8583.3387.8790.3488.8388.9887.8289.08
EXTRACCIÓN REDUCIDA A 12.5 % EN CAÑA % 90.5290.4090.5490.5090.3792.2091.6191.5391.0491.90
JUGO MEZCLADO t 196,069164,950128,83583,280106,018154,739163,352173,691137,176111,462
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA REFINADA t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA ESTANDAR t 19,20115,75913,44810,15510,48216,46219,33118,67214,62111,220
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA BLANCO ESPECIAL t 0 000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA MASCABADO t 0000000000
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL t 19,20115,75913,44810,15510,48216,46219,33118,67214,62111,220
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL (SEMANA DE MAYOR PROD. EN ZAFRA) t 1,3421,1541,3071,0731,1401,3801,5121,5101,2411,150
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL BASE ESTÁNDAR t 19,21815,77413,4547,13010,48216,46219,33118,67114,62111,220
AZÚCAR PRODUCIDA TOTAL POR DÍA t 123119136169129150151151111102
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX PRODUCIDA t 7,2055,1703,8942,9713,2783,1483,3874,0863,3582,416
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX POR TONELADA DE CAÑA kg 32.03227.05224.10422.15926.71718.52617.40520.33721.02318.404
MIEL FINAL 85° BRIX APORT. A FCA. DE ALCOHOL t 0000000000
ALCOHOL 96° PRODUCIDO l 0000000000
ALCOHOL / MIEL FINAL A 85° BRIX APORTADA l 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
CAMPO
CAÑA MOLIDA NETA
SUPERFICIE DE CAÑA COSECHADA
FRENTES DE CORTE
CORTADORES
CAÑA QUEMADA *
CAÑA COSECHADA MECÁNICAMENTE
CAÑA ALZADA MECÁNICAMENTE
VEHÍCULOS DE ACARREO *
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA BRUTA TEÓRICO
KARBE / TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA TEÓRICO
PRECIO DE REF. DEL AZÚCAR PARA PAGO DE LA
CAÑAPRECIO POR TONELADA DE CAÑA NETA
t
ha
Número
Persona
%
%
%
Camión
kg
kg
$
$
215,406178,298150,738125,167122,682169,915194,610200,934159,752131,269
3,7864,0473,3323,8433,1353,1103,6153,9363,5093,546
3455443443
389402497498478451503498400353
100.000100.00096.880100.00099.97096.36099.93099.410100.000100.000
13.7206.6604.4704.9200.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000100.000
36403232312833352613
92.46588.19287.70487.44897.50397.258101.00694.84094.49587.629
96.55494.52594.00293.68397.50397.258101.00694.84094.49587.629
6,356.455,996.136,579.2110,222.2610,368.5810,617.726,633.357,099.838,130.659,860.00
349.83323.07352.52545.86576.25588.62381.90383.81437.93492.49
MOLIENDA Y PRODUCCIÓN
-16.67
-17.33
-17.83
-6.00
-2.57
-1.39
-2.57
-13.43
-1.12
1.44
0.94
-18.75
0.00
-23.26
0.00
0.00
-23.26
-7.28
-23.26
-7.91
-28.07
-12.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
-17.83
1.04
-25.00
-11.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
-50.00
-7.27
-7.27
21.27
12.46
VALOR MÁXIMO
VALOR MÍNIMO
Fuente: CONADESUCA/SAGARPA con datos de los ingenios azucareros del país.
* Campo de valor Mínimo Óptimo
** Mes de inicio mas temprano
*** Variación anual de la última zafra respecto de la zafra anterior.
37