IND501 M1.5 Assignment Rubric Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Progressing toward Expectations Needs Improvement Unacceptable 35-32 points 31-28 points 27-21 points 21-1 points Personal code of ethics You clearly and fully describe your values and personal code; you provide a list and an explanation of your ethical principles. You describe your values and personal code; you provide a list and summary of your ethical principles. You briefly describe your values; you provide a brief list of your ethical principles. Additional details are needed to help explain your principles. You provide a minimum description of your values and principles. Major points are missing or are unclear. Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy. 25 – 23 points 22-20 19-17 points 16-1 points 0 points Application of ethical principles to make sound ethical decisions You use your ethical code and principles to provide a detailed and insightful explanation of how your code will help you to make sound ethical decisions. You provide specific examples to explain your code and how you would apply it. You use your ethical code and principles to provide an explanation of how your code will help you to make sound ethical decisions. You provide examples to explain your code and how you would apply it. Minor points require further development. You use your ethical code and principles to explain how your code will help you to make sound ethical decisions. Your explanation is incomplete. Examples only indirectly explain your code and how you would apply it. You use your ethical code and principles to explain how your code will help you to make sound ethical decisions. Your explanation is oversimplified or demonstrates misconceptions between ethical principles and practice. Examples, if provided, do not clearly support your code and how you would apply it Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy. 15– 14 points 13-12 points 11-9 points 8-1 points 0 points Connection of course materials to code You clearly and thoroughly describe the benefits of learning about your own discipline’s code of ethics and those of the panelists and how it helped you create your own ethical code. You describe the benefits of learning about your own discipline’s code of ethics and those of the panelists and how it helped you create your own ethical code. Minor points need further development. You provide a general description of the benefits of learning about your own discipline’s code of ethics and those of the panelists and how it helped you create your own ethical code. Your description is not fully developed, and more information is needed for the reader. You provide a brief description of the benefits of learning about ...