The document provides information about the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. It was established in 1945 to settle legal disputes submitted by states and give advisory opinions on legal questions. The ICJ is composed of 15 independent judges elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council who serve 9-year terms. Cases are heard either by the full court or chambers. States involved in a case can appoint a judge from their nationality if none of the court's judges are from that state. The court's registry provides administrative support and the court's official languages are English and French.
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - FACT SHEETVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
The International Criminal Court
For more than half a century since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, states have largely
failed to bring to justice those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. With the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the world has begun to fulfill the post-World War II promise of “never again.” The ICC is the world’s first permanent, international judicial body capable of bringing perpetrators to justice and providing redress to victims when states are unable or unwilling to do so. This represents a major stride for international justice. . .
What crimes does the Court prosecute?
The ICC can prosecute and bring to justice individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
How do cases come before the Court?
Cases come before the court in one of three ways: (1) The Court’s Prosecutor can initiate an investigation into a situation where one or more of the crimes has been committed, based on information from any source, including the victim or the victim’s family, but only if the Court has jurisdiction over the crime and individual. (2) States that have ratified the Rome Statute may ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed. (3) The U.N. Security Council can ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed, even if the crimes occurred in the territory of a state that has not ratified the Rome Statute or was committed by the national of such a state.
What is the U.S. position on the Court?
…the ICC would only investigate cases involving U.S. nationals if the U.S. failed to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute the individuals responsible. …
With WARMEST Regards,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(513) 680-2922
DONATIONS to support the work may be made at:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
CONFIDENTIAL/ANONYMOUS Donations may be made at:
https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
The “.02% DELEGATION” Website: www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT - FACT SHEETVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
The International Criminal Court
For more than half a century since the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, states have largely
failed to bring to justice those responsible for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. With the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the world has begun to fulfill the post-World War II promise of “never again.” The ICC is the world’s first permanent, international judicial body capable of bringing perpetrators to justice and providing redress to victims when states are unable or unwilling to do so. This represents a major stride for international justice. . .
What crimes does the Court prosecute?
The ICC can prosecute and bring to justice individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
How do cases come before the Court?
Cases come before the court in one of three ways: (1) The Court’s Prosecutor can initiate an investigation into a situation where one or more of the crimes has been committed, based on information from any source, including the victim or the victim’s family, but only if the Court has jurisdiction over the crime and individual. (2) States that have ratified the Rome Statute may ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed. (3) The U.N. Security Council can ask the Prosecutor to investigate a situation where one or more of the crimes have been committed, even if the crimes occurred in the territory of a state that has not ratified the Rome Statute or was committed by the national of such a state.
What is the U.S. position on the Court?
…the ICC would only investigate cases involving U.S. nationals if the U.S. failed to investigate and, if appropriate, prosecute the individuals responsible. …
With WARMEST Regards,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
(513) 680-2922
DONATIONS to support the work may be made at:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
CONFIDENTIAL/ANONYMOUS Donations may be made at:
https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
The “.02% DELEGATION” Website: www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
Indonesian Take on Alternative Dispute Settlements Part Two : Selection of Ar...anggihakim1
In arbitration, parties are entitled to determine how to proceed with the arbitration. It includes choosing an arbitration institution and rules and procedures to solve disputes. According to Art. 34 Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (“Law 30/1999”), “(1) Settlement of disputes through arbitration can be carried out using national or international arbitration institutions based on the agreement of the parties. (2) Settlement of disputes through the arbitration institution shall be carried out according to the rules and procedures of the chosen institution, unless otherwise stipulated by the parties”. Furthermore, pursuant to the elucidation of Art. 34 par. (2) parties are free to choose the applicable rules and procedures without having to use the rules and procedures of the chosen arbitration institution.[1] This would be because parties may have some of the procedures agreed upon in their contract.
In Indonesia, most arbitrations are institutional. Currently, some of the features of the most used arbitration rules and procedures are as follows:
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
WEEK 5: SUPREME COURT
Lesson
Lesson 5: The Supreme Court
"A law embodies beliefs that have triumphed in the battle of ideas.”
-Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Expected Outcomes
To understand the evolution of the Supreme Court in relation to the other branches of power; to appreciate the difference between the “original intent” and “judicial activist” philosophies; and to critically evaluate the political and cultural importance of major Supreme Court decisions.
Overview
I. The Legal Framework
Most American laws are based on the English legal system. The body of judge-made law is referred to as common law. The U.S. Constitution, State Constitutions and statutes - laws passed by Congress or State Legislatures - are sources upon which American law is founded. Common law countries around the world include: United States; Britain, Australia, Canada, India, and New Zealand.
The United States utilizes a dual court system which is comprised of both State and Federal Courts. The rules and principles which are the basis of court decisions are referred to as Case Law. Case law has bearing on future cases that involve similar facts and constitutional issues. The case law or court rule from previous cases establishes the precedents on which future cases will be relied upon in the decision making process. The doctrine of stare decisis means to stand on the decided cases.
A courts authority to hear and decide cases refers to the jurisdiction of the court. According to the Constitution, the accused must receive a fair trial in the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed. Federal Courts have jurisdiction when there is a federal question in the case, when there is diversity of citizenship involved in the case (meaning citizens from different states), and when there are two or more different states or state boundaries involved. When a case is to be heard in Federal Court, courts with limited jurisdiction include Tax and Bankruptcy Courts. These are examples of courts that deal with very specialized issues that do not deal with constitutional issues, but other federal issues.
II. The Judicial Powers
According to Article III of the Constitution, the judicial power of the United States would be vested in one Supreme Court. The actual authority of the Supreme Court was described as:
· “The Judicial power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizen ...
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
Indonesian Take on Alternative Dispute Settlements Part Two : Selection of Ar...anggihakim1
In arbitration, parties are entitled to determine how to proceed with the arbitration. It includes choosing an arbitration institution and rules and procedures to solve disputes. According to Art. 34 Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement (“Law 30/1999”), “(1) Settlement of disputes through arbitration can be carried out using national or international arbitration institutions based on the agreement of the parties. (2) Settlement of disputes through the arbitration institution shall be carried out according to the rules and procedures of the chosen institution, unless otherwise stipulated by the parties”. Furthermore, pursuant to the elucidation of Art. 34 par. (2) parties are free to choose the applicable rules and procedures without having to use the rules and procedures of the chosen arbitration institution.[1] This would be because parties may have some of the procedures agreed upon in their contract.
In Indonesia, most arbitrations are institutional. Currently, some of the features of the most used arbitration rules and procedures are as follows:
Top of FormWEEK 5 SUPREME COURT Lesson Lesson 5 Th.docxedwardmarivel
Top of Form
WEEK 5: SUPREME COURT
Lesson
Lesson 5: The Supreme Court
"A law embodies beliefs that have triumphed in the battle of ideas.”
-Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Expected Outcomes
To understand the evolution of the Supreme Court in relation to the other branches of power; to appreciate the difference between the “original intent” and “judicial activist” philosophies; and to critically evaluate the political and cultural importance of major Supreme Court decisions.
Overview
I. The Legal Framework
Most American laws are based on the English legal system. The body of judge-made law is referred to as common law. The U.S. Constitution, State Constitutions and statutes - laws passed by Congress or State Legislatures - are sources upon which American law is founded. Common law countries around the world include: United States; Britain, Australia, Canada, India, and New Zealand.
The United States utilizes a dual court system which is comprised of both State and Federal Courts. The rules and principles which are the basis of court decisions are referred to as Case Law. Case law has bearing on future cases that involve similar facts and constitutional issues. The case law or court rule from previous cases establishes the precedents on which future cases will be relied upon in the decision making process. The doctrine of stare decisis means to stand on the decided cases.
A courts authority to hear and decide cases refers to the jurisdiction of the court. According to the Constitution, the accused must receive a fair trial in the jurisdiction in which the crime was committed. Federal Courts have jurisdiction when there is a federal question in the case, when there is diversity of citizenship involved in the case (meaning citizens from different states), and when there are two or more different states or state boundaries involved. When a case is to be heard in Federal Court, courts with limited jurisdiction include Tax and Bankruptcy Courts. These are examples of courts that deal with very specialized issues that do not deal with constitutional issues, but other federal issues.
II. The Judicial Powers
According to Article III of the Constitution, the judicial power of the United States would be vested in one Supreme Court. The actual authority of the Supreme Court was described as:
· “The Judicial power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority; to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls; to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party; to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States; between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizen ...
Similar to ICJ Presentation PPT Shripad Jagdale (20)
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
2. THE NEW WORLD ORDER
“…to establish a new world order
wherein the rule of law rather than the
law of the jungle will govern the
conduct between nations…”
Republican President George Bush, after launching the
war against Iraq
3. THE NEW WORLD ORDER
“To hell with international law! You’ve
got a choice to make. You’re either for
us or against us, and I only hope for
your sake you make the right choice.”
Republican Senator Alfonse D’Amato
(New York)
4. PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
• In general, public international law governs the actions of states,
How states interact with each other and individual citizens,
Public international law involves rules and principles that deal with the conduct, rights
and obligations of states and international organisations, as well as dealing with
relations among states.
5. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AUTHORIZATION
Article 95
“Nothing in the present [UN] Charter shall prevent Members of the
United Nations from entrusting the solution of their differences to other
tribunals by virtue of agreements already in existence or which may be
concluded in the future.”
6. THE COURT
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United
Nations (UN). It was established in June 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations and
began work in April 1946.
The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). Of the six
principal organs of the United Nations, it is the only one not located in New York (United
States of America).
The Court’s role is to settle, in accordance with international law, legal disputes
submitted to it by States and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it
by authorized United Nations organs and specialized agencies.
The Court is composed of 15 judges, who are elected for terms of office of nine years by
the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council. It is assisted by a
Registry, its administrative organ. Its official languages are English and French.
7. MEMBERS OF THE COURT
The International Court of Justice is composed of 15 judges elected to nine-year terms of
office by the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council. These organs vote
simultaneously but separately. In order to be elected, a candidate must receive an absolute
majority of the votes in both bodies. This sometimes makes it necessary for a number of
rounds of voting to be carried out.
In order to ensure a measure of continuity, one third of the Court is elected every three years.
Judges are eligible for re-election. Should a judge die or resign during his or her term of
office, a special election is held as soon as possible to choose a judge to fill the unexpired part
of the term.
Elections are held in New York (United States of America) on the occasion of the annual
autumn session of the General Assembly. The judges elected at a triennial election enter upon
their term of office on 6 February of the following year, after which the Court proceeds to
elect by secret ballot a President and a Vice-President to hold office for three years.
All States parties to the Statute of the Court have the right to propose candidates. These
proposals are made not by the government of the State concerned, but by a group consisting
of the members of the Permanent Court of Arbitration designated by that State, i.e. by the
four jurists who can be called upon to serve as members of an arbitral tribunal under the
Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.
8. o Judges must be elected from among persons of high moral character, who possess the
qualifications required in their respective countries for appointment to the highest judicial
offices, or are jurisconsults of recognized competence in international law.
o The Court may not include more than one national of the same State. Moreover, the Court as a
whole must represent the main forms of civilization and the principal legal systems of the world.
o In practice this principle has found expression in the distribution of membership of the Court
among the principal regions of the globe. Today this distribution is as follows: Africa 3, Latin
America and the Caribbean 2, Asia 3, Western Europe and other States 5, Eastern Europe 2,
which corresponds to that of membership of the Security Council. Although there is no
entitlement to membership on the part of any country, the Court has always included judges of
the nationality of the permanent members of the Security Council.
o Once elected, a Member of the Court is a delegate neither of the government of his own
country nor of that of any other State. Unlike most other organs of international organizations,
the Court is not composed of representatives of governments. Members of the Court are
independent judges whose first task, before taking up their duties, is to make a solemn
declaration in open court that they will exercise their powers impartially.
9. PRESIDENCY
o The President and the Vice-President are elected by the Members of the Court every three
years by secret ballot. The election is held on the date on which Members of the Court
elected at a triennial election are to begin their terms of office or shortly thereafter. An
absolute majority is required and there are no conditions with regard to nationality. The
President and the Vice-President may be re-elected.
o The President presides at all meetings of the Court; he/she directs its work and supervises its
administration, with the assistance of a Budgetary and Administrative Committee and of
various other committees, all composed of Members of the Court. During judicial
deliberations, the President has a casting vote in the event of votes being equally divided.
o In The Hague, where he/she is obliged to reside, the President of the Court takes precedence
over the doyen of the diplomatic corps.
10. CHAMBERS
o The Court generally discharges its duties as a full Court (a quorum of nine judges,
excluding judges ad hoc, being sufficient). But it may also form permanent or temporary
chambers.
o The Court has three types of chamber: a. the Chamber of Summary Procedure, comprising
five judges, including the President and Vice-President, and two substitutes, which the
Court is required by Article 29 of the Statute to form annually with a view to the speedy
despatch of business; b. any chamber, comprising at least three judges, that the Court may
form pursuant to Article 26, paragraph 1, of the Statute to deal with certain categories of
cases, such as labour or communications; c. any chamber that the Court may form pursuant
to Article 26, paragraph 2, of the Statute to deal with a particular case, after formally
consulting the parties regarding the number of its members - and informally regarding
their name - who will then sit in all phases of the case until its final conclusion.
11. o With respect to the formation of a Chamber pursuant to Article 26, paragraph 1, of the
Statute, it should be noted that, in 1993, the Court created a Chamber for Environmental
Matters, which was periodically reconstituted until 2006. In the Chamber's 13 years of
existence, however, no State ever requested that a case be dealt with by it. The Court
consequently decided in 2006 not to hold elections for a Bench for the said Chamber.
o The provisions of the Rules concerning chambers of the Court are likely to be of interest to
States that are required to submit a dispute to the Court or have special reasons for doing so
but prefer, for reasons of urgency or other reasons, to deal with a smaller body than the full
Court.
o Despite the advantages that chambers can offer in certain cases, under the terms of the
Statute their use remains exceptional. Their formation requires the consent of the parties.
While, to date, no case has been heard by either of the first two types of chamber, by contrast
there have been six cases dealt with by ad hoc chambers.
12. JUDGES AD HOC
o Under Article 31, paragraphs 2 and 3, of the Statute of the Court, a State party to a case before the
International Court of Justice which does not have a judge of its nationality on the Bench may choose a
person to sit as judge ad hoc in that specific case under the conditions laid down in Articles 35 to 37 of the
Rules of Court. Before taking up his/her duties, a judge ad hoc is required to make the same solemn
declaration as an elected Member of the Court. He/she does not necessarily have to have (and often does not
have) the nationality of the designating State.
o A judge ad hoc takes part in any decision concerning the case on terms of complete equality with his/her
colleagues and receives a fee for every day on which he/she discharges his/her duties, that is to say, every day
spent in The Hague in order to take part in the Court’s work, plus each day devoted to consideration of the
case outside The Hague.
o A party must announce as soon as possible its intention to choose a judge ad hoc. In cases, which occur not
all that infrequently, where there are more than two parties to the dispute, it is laid down that parties which
are actually acting in the same interest are restricted to a single judge ad hoc between them - or, if one of
them already has a judge of its nationality on the Bench, they are not entitled to choose a judge ad hoc at all.
There are accordingly various possibilities, the following of which have actually occurred in practice: two
regular judges having the nationality of the parties; two judges ad hoc; a regular judge of the nationality of
one of the parties and a judge ad hoc; neither a regular judge having the nationality of one of the parties nor
a judge ad hoc.
13. HOW THE COURTS WORK
o Proceedings may be instituted in one of two ways: a. through the notification of a special
agreement: this document, which is of a bilateral nature, can be lodged with the Court by either
of the States parties to the proceedings or by both of them. b. by means of an application: the
application, which is of a unilateral nature, is submitted by an applicant State against a
respondent State. It is intended for communication to the latter State and the Rules of Court
contain stricter requirements with respect to its content. In addition to the name of the party
against which the claim is brought and the subject of the dispute, the applicant State must, as
far as possible, indicate briefly on what basis - a treaty or a declaration of acceptance of
compulsory jurisdiction - it claims the Court has jurisdiction, and must succinctly state the facts
and grounds on which it bases its claim. The date of the institution of proceedings, which is that
of the receipt by the Registrar of the special agreement or application, marks the opening of
proceedings before the Court. Contentious proceedings include a written phase, in which the
parties file and exchange pleadings containing a detailed statement of the points of fact and of
law on which each party relies, and an oral phase consisting of public hearings at which agents
and counsel address the Court. As the Court has two official languages (English and French),
everything written or said in one language is translated into the other. The written pleadings are
not made available to the press and public until the opening of the oral proceedings, and then
only if the parties have no objection.
14. THE REGISTRY
o The Registry is the permanent administrative organ of the Court. It is accountable to the Court
alone. It is headed by a Registrar, assisted by a Deputy-Registrar.
o Since the Court is both a court of justice and an international organ, the Registry’s tasks are not
only those of a service helping in the administration of justice - with sovereign States as litigants
- but also those of a secretariat of an international commission. Its activities are both judicial and
diplomatic, as well as administrative.
o The Registry consists of three Departments (Legal Matters; Linguistic Matters; Information), a
number of technical Divisions (Personnel/Administration; Finance; Publications; Library; IT;
Archives, Indexing and Distribution; Shorthand, Typewriting and Reproduction; General
Assistance) and the secretaries to Members of the Court. It currently comprises some 100
officials, either permanent or holding fixed-term contracts, appointed by the Court or the
Registrar.
o Those officials take an oath of loyalty and discretion on entering upon their duties. In general
they enjoy the same privileges and immunities as members of diplomatic missions at The Hague
of comparable rank. They are subject to Staff Regulations, which are virtually identical with the
United Nations Staff Regulations, and to Instructions for the Registry. Their conditions of
employment, salaries and pension rights correspond to those of United Nations officials of the
equivalent category and grade; the costs are borne by the United Nations.