SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
WADA Code 2015 – Some Troubling
          Proposals
Can I be charged for not reporting
    someone else’s doping?
                 • 2.9 Complicity in an
                   Anti-Doping Rule
                   Violation.
                    – Assisting, encouraging,
                      aiding, abetting,
                      conspiring, covering up
                      or any other type of
                      complicity involving an
                      anti-doping rule violation
                      or any Attempted anti-
                      doping rule violation by
                      another Person.
New Default Sanction = 4
        years?
            •   10.2.1 A violation involving any
                Prohibited Method or a Prohibited
                Substance in the classes of
                Anabolic Agents, Peptide
                Hormones, Growth Factors and
                Related Substances, Hormone and
                Metabolic Modulators, or Diuretics
                and Other Masking Agents, shall
                result in four (4) years Ineligibility
                unless the Athlete or other Person
                can establish that the commission of
                the anti-doping rule violation was
                neither intentional nor reckless.
4 Year Sanction for Specified
        Substances?
              •   10.2.2 Where an anti-doping
                  rule violation involves a
                  specified substance or a
                  substance not described in
                  Article 10.2.1 nor a specified
                  substance, and where the
                  Anti-Doping Organization
                  can establish that the
                  commission of the anti-
                  doping rule violation was
                  reckless or intentional, then
                  the period of Ineligibility shall
                  be four (4) years.
Further Undercutting of the Purpose
     of “Specified Substances”
                 •   10.2.3 Where an anti-doping
                     rule violation involves a
                     specified substance and the
                     Anti-Doping Organization
                     can establish that the
                     commission of the anti-
                     doping rule violation was
                     intentional, the period of
                     Ineligibility shall be four (4)
                     years.
The End of “Substantial
    Cooperation”?
           •   10.2.4 An Athlete or other
               Person, upon the approval of
               both WADA and the Anti-Doping
               Organization with results
               management responsibility, may
               be sanctioned with a period of
               Ineligibility of between four (4)
               and two (2) years by admitting
               the anti-doping rule violation as
               asserted under Article 10.2.1 or
               10.2.2 promptly after being
               confronted with the anti-doping
               rule violation by an Anti-Doping
               Organization.
Repayment of Prize Money or Lifetime
 Suspension? Is This Matuzalem II?
                  • 10.7.1 Athletes and
                    other Persons shall not
                    be allowed to
                    participate in
                    Competitions until all
                    prize money forfeited
                    under this Article has
                    been repaid, unless
                    fairness requires
                    otherwise.
Indefinite Suspension Part 2?

              • 10.12 Payment of CAS
                Cost Awards.
                 – Athletes and other
                   Persons shall not be
                   allowed to participate in
                   Competition until any
                   CAS cost awards against
                   them have been paid,
                   unless fairness requires
                   otherwise.
Did CAS Unilaterally Change the
    Arbitration Agreement?
               •   R65 Appeals against
                   decisions issued by
                   international federations in
                   disciplinary matters
               •   R65.1 The present Article
                   R65 is applicable to appeals
                   against decisions which are
                   exclusively of a disciplinary
                   nature and which are
                   rendered by an international
                   federation or sports-body
The Good – A New Contaminated
         Product Rule
              •   10.4.2 Contaminated Products.
              •   Where an Athlete or other Person
                  can establish No Significant Fault
                  and that the detected Prohibited
                  Substance came from a
                  Contaminated Product, then the
                  period of Ineligibility found in Article
                  10.2 shall be replaced with the
                  following: First Violation: At a
                  minimum, a reprimand and at a
                  maximum, two (2) years Ineligibility,
                  depending on the Athlete’s or other
                  Person’s degree of Fault.
                   –   But see Definition of Contaminated
                       Product: A product which an Athlete or
                       other Person could not have known
                       contained a Prohibited Substance.

More Related Content

More from Tackling Doping In Sport (6)

Stephen Watkins
Stephen WatkinsStephen Watkins
Stephen Watkins
 
Brett Clothier
Brett ClothierBrett Clothier
Brett Clothier
 
Rob Koehler
Rob KoehlerRob Koehler
Rob Koehler
 
Anders Solheim
Anders SolheimAnders Solheim
Anders Solheim
 
Volkan Topalli
Volkan TopalliVolkan Topalli
Volkan Topalli
 
Lars Mortsiefer
Lars MortsieferLars Mortsiefer
Lars Mortsiefer
 

Howard Jacobs

  • 1. WADA Code 2015 – Some Troubling Proposals
  • 2. Can I be charged for not reporting someone else’s doping? • 2.9 Complicity in an Anti-Doping Rule Violation. – Assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, conspiring, covering up or any other type of complicity involving an anti-doping rule violation or any Attempted anti- doping rule violation by another Person.
  • 3. New Default Sanction = 4 years? • 10.2.1 A violation involving any Prohibited Method or a Prohibited Substance in the classes of Anabolic Agents, Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors and Related Substances, Hormone and Metabolic Modulators, or Diuretics and Other Masking Agents, shall result in four (4) years Ineligibility unless the Athlete or other Person can establish that the commission of the anti-doping rule violation was neither intentional nor reckless.
  • 4. 4 Year Sanction for Specified Substances? • 10.2.2 Where an anti-doping rule violation involves a specified substance or a substance not described in Article 10.2.1 nor a specified substance, and where the Anti-Doping Organization can establish that the commission of the anti- doping rule violation was reckless or intentional, then the period of Ineligibility shall be four (4) years.
  • 5. Further Undercutting of the Purpose of “Specified Substances” • 10.2.3 Where an anti-doping rule violation involves a specified substance and the Anti-Doping Organization can establish that the commission of the anti- doping rule violation was intentional, the period of Ineligibility shall be four (4) years.
  • 6. The End of “Substantial Cooperation”? • 10.2.4 An Athlete or other Person, upon the approval of both WADA and the Anti-Doping Organization with results management responsibility, may be sanctioned with a period of Ineligibility of between four (4) and two (2) years by admitting the anti-doping rule violation as asserted under Article 10.2.1 or 10.2.2 promptly after being confronted with the anti-doping rule violation by an Anti-Doping Organization.
  • 7. Repayment of Prize Money or Lifetime Suspension? Is This Matuzalem II? • 10.7.1 Athletes and other Persons shall not be allowed to participate in Competitions until all prize money forfeited under this Article has been repaid, unless fairness requires otherwise.
  • 8. Indefinite Suspension Part 2? • 10.12 Payment of CAS Cost Awards. – Athletes and other Persons shall not be allowed to participate in Competition until any CAS cost awards against them have been paid, unless fairness requires otherwise.
  • 9. Did CAS Unilaterally Change the Arbitration Agreement? • R65 Appeals against decisions issued by international federations in disciplinary matters • R65.1 The present Article R65 is applicable to appeals against decisions which are exclusively of a disciplinary nature and which are rendered by an international federation or sports-body
  • 10. The Good – A New Contaminated Product Rule • 10.4.2 Contaminated Products. • Where an Athlete or other Person can establish No Significant Fault and that the detected Prohibited Substance came from a Contaminated Product, then the period of Ineligibility found in Article 10.2 shall be replaced with the following: First Violation: At a minimum, a reprimand and at a maximum, two (2) years Ineligibility, depending on the Athlete’s or other Person’s degree of Fault. – But see Definition of Contaminated Product: A product which an Athlete or other Person could not have known contained a Prohibited Substance.