This document provides a summary of developments in health care reform for the fourth quarter of 2011. It highlights what to expect in 2012, including Supreme Court arguments on the constitutionality of the individual mandate in March. It also summarizes new publications and tools available, recent news items such as litigation updates and regulations issued, and answers a frequently asked question on automatic enrollment requirements.
Healthcare check in the latest developments in health and welfare plansbenefitexpress
We work in an exciting industry—which means quick changes are the norm, and adaptability is a necessity.
Keep your compliance plan up-to-date with a download of recent legislative changes.
We'll cover legislation that's passed, what's on the way, and what it means for your organization.
Topics Covered Include:
• IRS Information Letters
• Tax Reform Legislation
• Wellness Regulations - EEOC, AARP
• Comprehensive Guidance on QSEHRAs
• ACA: Elimination of Individual Mandate Penalty
• Employer Tax Credit for Paid Family and Medical Leave
• DOL Annual Adjustments to Employee Benefit Plan Penalties
• “Good Faith” Penalty Relief
• Final Disability Claim Regulations
• Cadillac Tax Updates
• And More!
Presented by Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law
Health Reform Bulletin 133 | Executive Order Directing Modifications to the A...CBIZ, Inc.
An Executive Order, signed on October 12, 2017, promotes modifications of certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) (also see press statement). In a nutshell, this Executive Order directs the ACA’s governing agencies (Health and Human Services/Labor/Treasury) to address three
elements: formation of association health plans, expansion of short-term, limited-duration insurance, and expanding the rules to allow individual premium to be reimbursed through health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs). Briefly, this Executive Order directs the governing agencies to
Health Reform Bulletin 122 | 2017 Inflationary Adjustments and moreCBIZ, Inc.
1) 2017 Inflationary Adjustments; 2) Final Rules: Excepted Benefits, Lifetime and Annual Limits, and Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance; and 3) Whistleblower and Retaliation Protections
Learn how you can successfully navigate the Affordable Care Act, "Obama Care".
This easy to read outline will benefit your family and business.
Call (816-224-9466) for more information today.
Health Reform Bulletin 131 | The ACA Remains The Law of The LandCBIZ, Inc.
As has been covered extensively in the press, Congress went on its summer recess without repealing, replacing or modifying the Affordable Care Act. What this means for employers is that it is “business as usual”, including all reporting obligations, as more fully described below. So where does health care reform stand at this point? The answer to this question is far from clear.
Crystal Connection (1/2019): Trending News in Employee Benefits, January 2019Susan Glenn
The Crystal Connection monthly magazine provides the most up-to-date developments in federal and state regulations that affect employer-sponsored benefits programs, as well as trends in benefits. This is a must read for employers who want to stay compliant and in the know!
Healthcare check in the latest developments in health and welfare plansbenefitexpress
We work in an exciting industry—which means quick changes are the norm, and adaptability is a necessity.
Keep your compliance plan up-to-date with a download of recent legislative changes.
We'll cover legislation that's passed, what's on the way, and what it means for your organization.
Topics Covered Include:
• IRS Information Letters
• Tax Reform Legislation
• Wellness Regulations - EEOC, AARP
• Comprehensive Guidance on QSEHRAs
• ACA: Elimination of Individual Mandate Penalty
• Employer Tax Credit for Paid Family and Medical Leave
• DOL Annual Adjustments to Employee Benefit Plan Penalties
• “Good Faith” Penalty Relief
• Final Disability Claim Regulations
• Cadillac Tax Updates
• And More!
Presented by Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law
Health Reform Bulletin 133 | Executive Order Directing Modifications to the A...CBIZ, Inc.
An Executive Order, signed on October 12, 2017, promotes modifications of certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) (also see press statement). In a nutshell, this Executive Order directs the ACA’s governing agencies (Health and Human Services/Labor/Treasury) to address three
elements: formation of association health plans, expansion of short-term, limited-duration insurance, and expanding the rules to allow individual premium to be reimbursed through health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs). Briefly, this Executive Order directs the governing agencies to
Health Reform Bulletin 122 | 2017 Inflationary Adjustments and moreCBIZ, Inc.
1) 2017 Inflationary Adjustments; 2) Final Rules: Excepted Benefits, Lifetime and Annual Limits, and Short-Term, Limited-Duration Insurance; and 3) Whistleblower and Retaliation Protections
Learn how you can successfully navigate the Affordable Care Act, "Obama Care".
This easy to read outline will benefit your family and business.
Call (816-224-9466) for more information today.
Health Reform Bulletin 131 | The ACA Remains The Law of The LandCBIZ, Inc.
As has been covered extensively in the press, Congress went on its summer recess without repealing, replacing or modifying the Affordable Care Act. What this means for employers is that it is “business as usual”, including all reporting obligations, as more fully described below. So where does health care reform stand at this point? The answer to this question is far from clear.
Crystal Connection (1/2019): Trending News in Employee Benefits, January 2019Susan Glenn
The Crystal Connection monthly magazine provides the most up-to-date developments in federal and state regulations that affect employer-sponsored benefits programs, as well as trends in benefits. This is a must read for employers who want to stay compliant and in the know!
Health Reform Bulletin 143 | Status of ACA Litigation; Murky Future of AHPs; ...CBIZ, Inc.
Litigation challenging and rescinding various aspects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) continues to reign. Last December, Judge Reed O’Connor of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals opined that the individual mandate, in the absence of the tax repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, is unconstitutional; and since it is a cornerstone of the ACA, then the entire ACA must fall (see our prior CBIZ Health Reform Bulletin 142).
The Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 was recently passed by the House and will be signed into law 03/30/2010. NAHU (National Association for Health Underwriters) published a comprehensive timeline of the changes coming over the next few years. Please contact me with any questions.
This presentation explains the process followed by CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) when estimating the costs of legislative proposals affecting health insurance coverage. An example is the agencies’ estimate of how repealing the individual mandate to have health insurance would affect federal deficits.
Presentation by Sarah Masi, an analyst in CBO’s Budget Analysis Division, at a Congressional Research Service seminar on CBO’s methods for developing cost estimates.
Presentation by Alice Burns and Jaeger Nelson, analysts in CBO’s Budget Analysis Division and Macroeconomic Analysis Division, to the National Tax Association.
What’s in Your Rule Book? A Common Sense Approach to Plan Documentation.CBIZ, Inc.
Two recent eligibility opportunities, one created as a result of a US Supreme Court decision and the other enacted by law, are a wake-up call for plan sponsors of welfare and pension benefit plans to review and update, as appropriate, the terms of their plans. As is well known by now, the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor1 extended federal tax and benefit rights to couples in a same-sex marriage. In addition, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) incents employers to extend
eligibility to their workforce or risk an excise tax penalty. Plan sponsors should review their plan documents in light of these recent developments to ensure that the plan language is current and compliant.
The federal government subsidizes health insurance for most Americans through a variety of programs and tax provisions. In 2017, net subsidies for people under age 65 will total $705 billion, CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate.
This presentation provides an overview of CBO and JCT’s current baseline projections of health insurance coverage and how those projections have changed since March 2016, highlighting changes in Medicaid and CHIP enrollment and nongroup coverage.
Presentation by Jessica Banthin, Deputy Assistant Director in CBO’s Health, Retirement, and Long-Term Analysis Division, at a Congressional Research Service seminar on CBO’s methods for developing cost estimates.
This is the PowerPoint presentation from Kegler Brown's "2011 Managing Labor and Employee Relations Seminar," held on March 1, 2011, at the Fawcett Center on the campus of The Ohio State University. Topics included recent case law updates, social media in the workplace, distracted driving policies, an update on workers' compensation from ODJFS, an update on complying with healthcare reform and much more.
As a continuation of my last article, “tax the Rich…Tax the Rich…Tax the Rich…,” I asked Brian Seifert, CPA to fill in some additional tax changes that would affect our clients as we approach the year end and look forward to 2010. Brian is a new Aegis Council member who is helping our clients prepare for the onslaught of new taxes by identifying tax planning opportunities, assist the clients taking advantage of their planning opportunities then preparing the tax returns as part of the Aegis Council Tax Planning Package. Every Aegis Council member has undergone a thorough background check and peer reviews to insure only the best and brightest professionals are provided to our clients.
To prepare its spring 2019 baseline budget projections, CBO is using new sources of data as inputs and has completely revamped the way it models consumers’ and employers’ behavior. To that end, it has developed HISIM2, a new version of the model CBO uses to generate estimates of health insurance coverage and premiums for the population under age 65. The model is used in conjunction with other models to develop baseline budget projections (which incorporate the assumption that current law generally remains the same). It is also used to estimate the effects of proposed changes in policies that affect health insurance coverage.
HISIM2 incorporates new base data, including data from surveys and administrative data. It changes the way individuals and families are projected to choose among coverage options. And it changes the way firms are projected to take workers’ preferences into account when deciding whether to offer employment-based coverage.
If the employer mandate is repealed, many ALEs will likely want to modify their plan designs to go back to pre-ACA eligibility rules. Employers may also consider increasing the amount that employees are required to contribute for group health plan coverage.
Health Reform Bulletin 137 | Delay of Certain ACA Taxes and Fees; Benefit and...CBIZ, Inc.
On January 22, 2018, President Trump signed H.R. 195. Along with providing short-term government funding, it also extends funding of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for six years through 2023. This program provides low-cost health coverage to children in families who do not qualify for Medicaid, as well as for pregnant women residing in certain states.
Created by WEA Trust Vice President & General Counsel Vaughn Vance, this presentation helps explain to employers the changing health insurance marketplace. You'll learn about new fees and taxes, plan restrictions and employer obligations under health care reform.
Employers Healthcare Reform Overview and TimelineThe comprehensive nature of this recently passed reform includes benefit re-design, increased administrative compliance costs, eligibility rule restructuring, increased taxes and health insurance exchange management. Employers need to streamline their operations to meet ...compliance requirements set by the legislation and their employer\’s workforce size.
Health Reform Bulletin 143 | Status of ACA Litigation; Murky Future of AHPs; ...CBIZ, Inc.
Litigation challenging and rescinding various aspects of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) continues to reign. Last December, Judge Reed O’Connor of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals opined that the individual mandate, in the absence of the tax repealed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, is unconstitutional; and since it is a cornerstone of the ACA, then the entire ACA must fall (see our prior CBIZ Health Reform Bulletin 142).
The Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 was recently passed by the House and will be signed into law 03/30/2010. NAHU (National Association for Health Underwriters) published a comprehensive timeline of the changes coming over the next few years. Please contact me with any questions.
This presentation explains the process followed by CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) when estimating the costs of legislative proposals affecting health insurance coverage. An example is the agencies’ estimate of how repealing the individual mandate to have health insurance would affect federal deficits.
Presentation by Sarah Masi, an analyst in CBO’s Budget Analysis Division, at a Congressional Research Service seminar on CBO’s methods for developing cost estimates.
Presentation by Alice Burns and Jaeger Nelson, analysts in CBO’s Budget Analysis Division and Macroeconomic Analysis Division, to the National Tax Association.
What’s in Your Rule Book? A Common Sense Approach to Plan Documentation.CBIZ, Inc.
Two recent eligibility opportunities, one created as a result of a US Supreme Court decision and the other enacted by law, are a wake-up call for plan sponsors of welfare and pension benefit plans to review and update, as appropriate, the terms of their plans. As is well known by now, the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor1 extended federal tax and benefit rights to couples in a same-sex marriage. In addition, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) incents employers to extend
eligibility to their workforce or risk an excise tax penalty. Plan sponsors should review their plan documents in light of these recent developments to ensure that the plan language is current and compliant.
The federal government subsidizes health insurance for most Americans through a variety of programs and tax provisions. In 2017, net subsidies for people under age 65 will total $705 billion, CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) estimate.
This presentation provides an overview of CBO and JCT’s current baseline projections of health insurance coverage and how those projections have changed since March 2016, highlighting changes in Medicaid and CHIP enrollment and nongroup coverage.
Presentation by Jessica Banthin, Deputy Assistant Director in CBO’s Health, Retirement, and Long-Term Analysis Division, at a Congressional Research Service seminar on CBO’s methods for developing cost estimates.
This is the PowerPoint presentation from Kegler Brown's "2011 Managing Labor and Employee Relations Seminar," held on March 1, 2011, at the Fawcett Center on the campus of The Ohio State University. Topics included recent case law updates, social media in the workplace, distracted driving policies, an update on workers' compensation from ODJFS, an update on complying with healthcare reform and much more.
As a continuation of my last article, “tax the Rich…Tax the Rich…Tax the Rich…,” I asked Brian Seifert, CPA to fill in some additional tax changes that would affect our clients as we approach the year end and look forward to 2010. Brian is a new Aegis Council member who is helping our clients prepare for the onslaught of new taxes by identifying tax planning opportunities, assist the clients taking advantage of their planning opportunities then preparing the tax returns as part of the Aegis Council Tax Planning Package. Every Aegis Council member has undergone a thorough background check and peer reviews to insure only the best and brightest professionals are provided to our clients.
To prepare its spring 2019 baseline budget projections, CBO is using new sources of data as inputs and has completely revamped the way it models consumers’ and employers’ behavior. To that end, it has developed HISIM2, a new version of the model CBO uses to generate estimates of health insurance coverage and premiums for the population under age 65. The model is used in conjunction with other models to develop baseline budget projections (which incorporate the assumption that current law generally remains the same). It is also used to estimate the effects of proposed changes in policies that affect health insurance coverage.
HISIM2 incorporates new base data, including data from surveys and administrative data. It changes the way individuals and families are projected to choose among coverage options. And it changes the way firms are projected to take workers’ preferences into account when deciding whether to offer employment-based coverage.
If the employer mandate is repealed, many ALEs will likely want to modify their plan designs to go back to pre-ACA eligibility rules. Employers may also consider increasing the amount that employees are required to contribute for group health plan coverage.
Health Reform Bulletin 137 | Delay of Certain ACA Taxes and Fees; Benefit and...CBIZ, Inc.
On January 22, 2018, President Trump signed H.R. 195. Along with providing short-term government funding, it also extends funding of the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for six years through 2023. This program provides low-cost health coverage to children in families who do not qualify for Medicaid, as well as for pregnant women residing in certain states.
Created by WEA Trust Vice President & General Counsel Vaughn Vance, this presentation helps explain to employers the changing health insurance marketplace. You'll learn about new fees and taxes, plan restrictions and employer obligations under health care reform.
Employers Healthcare Reform Overview and TimelineThe comprehensive nature of this recently passed reform includes benefit re-design, increased administrative compliance costs, eligibility rule restructuring, increased taxes and health insurance exchange management. Employers need to streamline their operations to meet ...compliance requirements set by the legislation and their employer\’s workforce size.
Galen Benshoof, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, presented on Realizing the Promise of the ACA: Implementation of State Health Reform at the State Legislative Conference on November 6, 2015.
What legal impacts did the ACA have on tax-exempt hospitalsSolu.pdfdeepaksatrker
What legal impacts did the ACA have on tax-exempt hospitals?
Solution
Ans:-
The ACA amendments do not depend on formal agency policy to take effect. Nonetheless,
Congress directed the Treasury Secretary to issue regulations and guidance necessary to carry
out the reforms (26 U.S.C. §501(r)(7)). To this end, two important sets of proposed rules were
issued: the first in June, 2012; and the second, in April 2013. While an informative IRS website
lists various proposed rules and guidelines important to nonprofit hospitals, final rules seem to
have performed a disappearing act.
Apparently recognizing the problems created by its delays, the agency has gone so far as to issue
aspecial Notice letting nonprofit hospitals (and presumably the public) know that they can rely
on its proposed rules. But this assurance overlooks the fact that the proposed rules themselves
contained crucial areas in which final agency policy has not yet been adopted.
The ACA Reforms
Section 9007 of the ACA added a new §501(r) to the Internal Revenue Code, establishing a set
of expanded obligations as a condition of federal tax-exempt status. The Hilltop Institute, which
tracks state activities around hospital community benefit, reports that many states link their own
tax-exempt policies to satisfaction of federal tax-exempt requirements.
The ACA’s expanded obligations span a number of important areas: community health planning;
financial assistance for patients; and hospitals’ billing and collection practices.
Community Health Needs Assessment
The ACA requires hospitals to conduct a community health needs assessment (CHNA). This
requirement took effect in 2012; it consists not only of planning with broad community and
public health input but also adoption of an Implementation Strategy detailing how the hospital’s
community benefit investment will meet the needs identified in the CHNA (26 U.S.C.
§501(r)(3)). Following the issuance ofpreliminary 2011 guidance , the IRS issued a proposed
rule in 2013, 77 Fed. Reg. 20523 (April 5, 2013) outlining a relatively robust CHNA process,
even as it left certain aspects of its CHNA policy less than fully defined. Critical issues that
remain outstanding include how hospitals define “community,” and whether the all-important
Implementation Strategy component of the CHNA process — essentially a hospital
organization’s community benefit investment blueprint — must itself be made available for
public comment prior to board adoption.
The ACA amendments do not depend on formal agency policy to take effect. Nonetheless,
Congress directed the Treasury Secretary to issue regulations and guidance necessary to carry
out the reforms (26 U.S.C. §501(r)(7)). To this end, two important sets of proposed rules were
issued: the first in June, 2012; and the second, in April 2013. While an informative IRS website
lists various proposed rules and guidelines important to nonprofit hospitals, final rules seem to
have performed a disappearing act.
Apparently re.
Health & Human Services - Regulatory Reform - January 2012 UpdateObama White House
In January 2011, President Obama outlined his plan to create a 21st-century regulatory system – one that protects public health and welfare while promoting economic growth, innovation, competitiveness, and job creation. Among other things, his Executive Order on Regulation said the following: Always consider costs and reduce burdens for American businesses and consumers when developing rules; expand opportunities for public participation and public comment; simplify rules; promote freedom of choice; and ensure that regulations are driven by real science. this is the January 2012 update from the Department of Health and Human Services, go here for more information:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/21stcenturygov/actions/21st-century-regulatory-system
On Thursday, March 22, 2012, the Illinois Senate convened a Committee of the Whole to hear a presentation on Medicaid from Joy Johnson Wilson of the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Health Reform Bulletin – IRS PronouncementsCBIZ, Inc.
Information on 1) Cafeteria Plan Status Change Events, 2) Employment Status Change Proposals to Employer Shared Responsibility Rules, 3) Increase in PCOR Fees, and Final Excepted Benefit Regulations. Recently, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released three pronouncements relating to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In addition, final regulations have been issued relating to certain excepted health benefits.
On Nov. 8, 2013, the DOL, HHS and the Treasury released Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding implementation of the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act. These FAQs were released in conjunction with final rules on the MHPAEA, which contain some clarification regarding the law's protections.
As of July 2, 2013, the Obama administration is delaying large employer compliance with the Employer Mandate standards and its reporting rules until 2015. http://www.prescottpailet.com/
How to Avoid a Head-on Collision with The Cadillac TaxBill Conlan
The Webinar addressed what state and local governments need to know about how other provisions of reform that take effect beginning in 2010 will complicate the challenge of meeting the thresholds – and that the time to begin planning for the Cadillac tax is now.
The presenters provided details on the Cadillac tax and factors that complicate compliance with premium thresholds such as the removal of traditional coverage limits, the increase in the dependent eligibility age, additional fees, mental health parity and the estimated 16 million more Americans who will receive Medicaid.
1. Health Care Reform Quarterly
Q4 2011
Health Care Reform Quarterly is devoted to developments surrounding the implementation of health care reform. This
edition features an update on what’s in store in 2012, a summary of publications that can help you better understand and
implement required provisions, significant health care reform news over the past quarter and a response to a frequently
asked question regarding the timeline for compliance with the automatic enrollment provision required under PPACA.
Table of Contents
Featured Story
Health Care Reform: What’s Coming in 2012?
New and Updated Publications and Tools
In the News
Health Care Reform Litigation Update
Initial HHS Proposal Gives States Flexibility to Define Essential Health Benefits
HHS Issues CO-OP Program Regulations
End Date Announced for Claims Under Early Retiree Reinsurance Program
Final MLR Regulations Released
HHS Releases FAQs Concerning Implementation of Exchanges
FAQ Issued on Health Care Reform’s SBC Requirement
HHS Suspends PPACA’s CLASS Program
Institute of Medicine Releases Criteria for HHS to Develop Essential Benefits Package
Under PPACA
Frequently Asked Question
When do employers have to comply with the new automatic enrollment requirements imposed
under PPACA?
Acronyms Glossary
continued >>>
2. Page 2 of 8 Health Care Reform Quarterly Q4 2011
Featured Story
Health Care Reform: What’s Coming in 2012?
Much has happened in the health care reform landscape, and there is more to come in 2012. Here’s a look at where we
are and what to expect in 2012.
As of Sept. 23, 2010, nearly all plans are required to provide coverage for adult children to age 26, are prohibited from
having lifetime limits on the dollar value of “essential health benefits” (annual limits on the dollar value of essential benefits
were first restricted in 2010 and are prohibited in 2014), are prohibited from rescinding coverage except in the case of
fraud or intentional misstatement of material fact, and are prohibited from imposing pre-existing condition limitations for
coverage of children under age 19. Additionally, for plan years beginning on or after Sept. 23, 2010, certain preventive
coverage must be provided with no cost sharing, although grandfathered plans are exempt from this requirement.
In terms of what to expect in 2012, let’s first take a look at what has been eliminated. When PPACA was first enacted,
the Secretary of HHS was required to create procedures and protocols for the Community Living Assistance Services
and Supports (CLASS) Act, which was designed to establish a national, voluntary long-term care insurance program for
purchasing community living assistance services and supports. Procedures for the CLASS program were expected to
be released in 2012; however, on Oct. 14, 2011, HHS announced that, due to actuarial and solvency challenges, it would
halt implementation of the CLASS Act.
Beginning in 2012, most employers that provide “applicable employer sponsored coverage” must begin reporting
information concerning an employee’s insurance benefits on the employee’s Form W-2 issued in early 2013. Some
coverage, such as disability insurance and long-term care coverage, does not have to be reported. (Ask your advisor
for a copy of the NFP white paper on the W-2 reporting requirement for additional information). There is also a small
employer exception for employers who filed fewer than 250 Forms W-2 for 2011. Unless changed by future guidance,
those employers who file fewer than 250 Forms W-2 for one calendar year will be exempt for the next calendar year.
PPACA also requires plans to provide a new four-page summary of benefits and coverage to all enrollees who meet
specified criteria, with an applicability date of March 23, 2012, initially proposed. Because final regulations on this
requirement have not yet been issued, recent guidance provides that plans and issuers are not yet required to comply,
noting that the final regulations, once issued, will include an applicability date that gives group health plans and health
insurance issuers sufficient time to comply.
Further, starting with policies having a plan year ending after Sept. 30, 2012, a fee of $2 per the number of lives covered
under a plan will be assessed for insurers of specified health insurance policies and by sponsors of applicable self-
insured health plans. This fee will fund comparative effectiveness research, and the fee will not apply to any policy year
ending after Sept. 30, 2019.
Employers who sponsor FSAs should also prepare to comply with the new annual limit on health FSAs, capping the
maximum contribution amount at $2,500, which goes into effect Jan. 1, 2013. For plans that currently permit health FSA
salary reductions in excess of $2,500, plan amendments and changes to employee communications will be required
before the January 1, 2013, effective date. Additionally, to simplify the administration of the new FSA limit, sponsors of
non-calendar-year plans (those that straddle two calendar years) should consider implementing the $2,500 maximum as
of the first day of the plan year that starts in 2012.
Finally, in 2012, the Supreme Court is expected hear oral arguments for three days beginning on March 26, 2012, and
ending on March 28, 2012, on the constitutionality of PPACA’s individual mandate, among a handful of other issues,
described below. The court is expected to issue a decision by late June, in the middle of the presidential election
year. Importantly, despite the uncertainty in this area due to the pending litigation, employers should be moving forward
with implementation.
New aNd updated publicatioNS aNd toolS
• Impact on Employees, Revised January 2012
• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Brandable White Paper, Revised December 2011
• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Brandable FAQs, Revised November 2011
• Grandfathered Health Plans Test Model, Revised November 2011
• Interim Final Rules for Grandfathered Health Plans, Revised October 2011
Ask your advisor for a copy of these publications.
3. Page 3 of 8 Health Care Reform Quarterly Q4 2011
iN the NewS
Health Care Reform Litigation Update
There have been two recent developments regarding health care reform litigation. More information about these
developments is detailed below.
Supreme Court
On Monday, Nov. 14, 2011, the Supreme Court agreed to review three of the five separate appeals challenging the
constitutionality of PPACA. Within the three appeals, the court selected for review only those issues tied to the overall
question of how governmental power is divided between national and state governments. The court will not review, at
this time, the cases involving the Thomas More Law Center and Liberty University, and the issue involving the employer
mandate. Additionally, the Seven-Sky v. Holder decision, discussed in more detail below, is not one that the Supreme
Court agreed to review.
The court announced on Dec. 19, 2011, that it will hear oral arguments on these issues for three days, beginning on
March 26, 2012, and ending on March 28, 2012, totaling 5 1/2 hours of actual argument. The court is expected to issue a
decision by late June, in the middle of the presidential election year.
The issues chosen by the court for review are:
The Individual Mandate — This provision of PPACA has been the centerpiece of the constitutionality challenges. It
requires all individuals to maintain a minimum level of health insurance or pay a penalty. Opponents claim it is a federal
intrusion into a private matter that is beyond the scope of Congress’ reach, and that there must be a limit on the federal
government’s powers. Specifically, this is Question 1 in the government case U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services v. Florida, et al., and it has been granted two hours of oral argument.
Severability — The issue of severability asks what other provisions of PPACA, if any, are so closely intertwined with
the individual mandate that they rise and fall together. When Congress debated the health care reform law, it justified
the necessity of the individual mandate due to the implementation of insurance market reforms. The thought is that the
individual mandate will diminish the effects of adverse selection when reforms are implemented, such as guarantee
issue, the prohibition on pre-existing condition provisions and rating mandates. The court will have to determine if
Congress wanted those market reforms – and others – if the individual mandate was not included. Specifically, this is
the only question in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius and Question 3 in Florida, et al., v. U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. The cases have been consolidated for 90 minutes of oral argument.
Jurisdiction — The court will review whether the Anti-Injunction Act bars the lawsuit (assuming the penalty is
characterized as a federal tax) before the tax is actually enforced. This act requires the taxpayer to pay the tax and then
pursue a challenge, which would mean that the individual mandate issue would not be heard by the court at this time,
because the mandate is not in effect until 2014. Specifically, the act declares that “no suit for the purpose of restraining
the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any Court by any person,” and was intended to keep
the government’s revenues flowing even while a taxpayer objects to paying a certain tax. There is a separate question
within this argument of whether the act applies to states as challengers. Specifically, this is an added question in the
government case U.S. Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida, et al., and it has been granted one hour of
oral argument.
Medicaid Expansion — The states have also raised the issue of the broad expansion of the Medicaid law. Simplified,
this questions to what extent Congress can apply a heavy hand to conditions states must agree to before accepting
federal funding. Specifically, this is Question 1 in the Florida, et al., v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
case, and it has been granted one hour of oral argument.
Seven-Sky v. Holder
On Nov. 8, 2011, in Seven-Sky v. Holder, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision, ruling that
PPACA’s individual mandate is constitutional. Judge Laurence Silberman, who was nominated by President Ronald
Reagan, wrote the 2-1 opinion, and is now the second conservative judge to uphold the mandate.
While plaintiffs in many of the health care reform suits have argued that Congress exceeded its authority in enacting the
mandate, the plaintiffs in this case presented a slightly different argument, arguing that the mandate violates the religious
freedom of those who choose not to have insurance because they rely on God to protect them from harm.
The D.C. Circuit is now the second appeals court to uphold the constitutionality of the individual mandate. This
means that two appellate courts upheld the mandate, one ruled against it and one declined to reach a decision, citing
procedural legal issues. The Supreme Court will not review this case, which means, in practice, the ruling may have little
4. Page 4 of 8 Health Care Reform Quarterly Q4 2011
impact. Nevertheless, the ruling does improve PPACA’s record in federal appellate courts, and the reasoning of the D.C.
Circuit Court judges may ultimately prove to be persuasive to the Supreme Court.
Benefits Compliance will continue to monitor the status of the health care reform litigation and keep you informed.
Supreme Court PPACA Briefs (http://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/PPAACA.aspx)
Seven-Sky v. Holder (https://internal.nfp.com/webfiles/public/Benefits/ComplianceCorner/documents/Seven-
Sky_vs_Holder.pdf)
Supreme Court Argument Calendar (http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/
MonthlyArgumentCalMAR2012.pdf)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Initial HHS Proposal Gives States Flexibility to Define Essential Health Benefits
On Dec. 16, 2011, HHS released a “pre-rule” bulletin to provide information and solicit comments on the regulatory
approach that HHS plans to propose to define essential health benefits (EHB) under PPACA § 1302(b). Non-grandfathered
plans in the individual and small group markets inside and outside of the exchanges must cover EHB beginning in 2014.
Section 1302(b)(1) provides that EHB include items and services within the following 10 benefit categories:
• Ambulatory patient services
• Emergency services
• Hospitalization
• Maternity and newborn care
• Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment
• Prescription drugs
• Rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices
• Laboratory services
• Preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management
• Pediatric services, including oral and vision care
Under HHS’ intended approach as announced in the bulletin, states would have the flexibility to select an existing health
plan to set the benchmark for the items and services included in the EHB package. States would choose one of the
following health insurance plans as a benchmark:
• One of the three largest small group plans in the state
• One of the three largest state employee health plans
• One of the three largest federal employee health plan options
• The largest HMO plan offered in the state’s commercial market
To meet the EHB coverage standard, HHS intends to require that a health plan offer benefits that are “substantially
equal” to the benchmark plan selected by the state and modified as necessary to reflect the 10 coverage categories.
The bulletin addresses only the services and items covered by a health plan, not the cost sharing, such as deductibles,
copayments and coinsurance, which will be addressed in future bulletins. Final rules are expected to be issued
sometime next year. HHS is accepting comments on the proposal, which are due by Jan 31, 2012, and may be sent to
EssentialHealthBenefits@cms.hhs.gov.
Essential Health Benefits Bulletin (http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/files/Files2/12162011/essential_health_benefits_
bulletin.pdf)
Fact Sheet (http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2011/12/essential-health-benefits12162011a.html)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Page 5 of 8 Health Care Reform Quarterly Q4 2011
HHS Issues CO-OP Program Regulations
On Dec. 13, 2011, HHS issued final regulations implementing the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (CO-OP)
program, which provides loans to encourage the establishment of consumer-governed, private, nonprofit health insurers
(referred to as CO-OPs). CO-OPs are designed to offer individuals and small businesses additional affordable, consumer-
friendly and high-quality health insurance options. Starting Jan. 1, 2014, CO-OPs will offer health plans through the new,
competitive health care marketplaces in each state, called the Affordable Insurance Exchanges. In addition to offering
health plans through an exchange, CO-OPs may offer health plans outside of an exchange.
Two types of loans are available under the program: startup loans for costs associated with establishing a CO-OP, and
solvency loans to help CO-OPs satisfy state solvency and reserve requirements. The final regulations address eligibility
standards for the CO-OP program, establish terms for loans and provide certain basic standards that organizations
must meet to participate in the program and become CO-OPs. The regulations are effective Feb. 13, 2012, and finalize
proposed regulations that were issued in July 2011.
Regulations (http://www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2011/12/essential-health-benefits12162011a.html)
Fact Sheet (http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/factsheets/coop_final_rule.html)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
End Date Announced for Claims Under Early Retiree Reinsurance Program
Congress appropriated $5 billion for the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP), established under PPACA, and
directed the Secretary of HHS to set up the program within 90 days of enactment. By law, ERRP is scheduled to end
when its resources have been used to pay claims. Due to the significantly high response from employers, the program
stopped taking applications as of May 6, 2011.
On Dec. 9, 2011, CMS notified plan sponsors that $4.5 billion had been paid and issued further guidance informing plan
sponsors that claims incurred after Dec. 31, 2011, will not be accepted. HHS has also announced that any claim list that
includes a claim incurred after that date will be rejected in its entirety. Claims incurred on or before Dec. 31, 2011, but
paid after that date may still be submitted, but not until the claim has been paid.
Reimbursement requests received after the $5 billion has been fully exhausted will be held in the order of receipt,
pending availability of funds. Sponsors with reimbursement requests on hold can expect to:
• Receive an email notifying them that their reimbursement requests have been placed on hold pending availability
of funds;
• Have access to information about the position of their requests in the list of held reimbursement requests; and
• Be paid in the order in which reimbursement requests were received, if additional funds become available. In such
cases, reimbursement requests will be honored until there are not sufficient funds to pay a reimbursement request
in its entirety, at which time, that request will be partially paid and the balance will be paid if and when additional
funds become available. Each time a partial payment is processed, the plan sponsor will receive an email notification
regarding the specific amount paid and the balance remaining to be paid.
In addition to the news release and notice, HHS issued an updated state-by-state list of amounts paid to
approved sponsors.
Notice (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-12-13/pdf/2011-31920.pdf)
News Release (http://www.errp.gov/newspages/20111209-updated-payment-processing-new-incurred-date.
shtml)
Update (http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/files/Files2/12092011/errp_disbursement_12_02_2011_508.pdf)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Final MLR Regulations Released
HHS released a final rule on Dec. 2, 2011, relating to the medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements enacted as a part of
PPACA § 2718, which does not exempt agent and broker commissions from the final MLR calculation. The final rule does
not explicitly address commissions, instead leaving the calculation of administrative costs unchanged from the original
draft. Thus, the fundamental structure of the MLR policy is not changing.
6. Page 6 of 8 Health Care Reform Quarterly Q4 2011
Beginning in 2011, the law required insurance companies in the individual and small group markets to spend at least
80 percent of the premium dollars they collect on medical care and quality improvement activities. Insurance companies
in the large group market must spend at least 85 percent of premium dollars on medical care and quality improvement
activities. Insurance companies that do not meet the MLR standard will be required to provide rebates to their consumers.
Insurers will make the first round of rebates to consumers in 2012. Rebates must be paid by Aug. 1 each year.
The changes in this final rule largely address technical issues involved in the way issuers calculate and report their MLR and
the mechanism for distributing rebates to enrollees in group health plans. The regulations clarify that any MLR rebates paid
out to consumers are tax-free. Under an earlier rule, rebates to employers would have been taxable, so the final rule says
any rebates given for group policies should be in the form of lower premiums or “in other ways that are not taxable.” This
process will vary by plan type, but policy holders must ensure that the rebates are used for the benefit of subscribers.
Under the final rule, plans must send their customers a notice about the MLR even if they meet the requirements and do
not have to offer rebates. The notice will explain how the policy works, what the plan’s loss ratio was, and how it changed
because of the health care law. Also, HHS agreed to phase out allowances for the administrative expenses of
so-called mini-med plans that offer limited benefits to individuals or small groups.
HHS Fact Sheet (http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/factsheets/mlrfinalrule.html)
Final Rule (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-12-07/html/2011-31289.htm)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
HHS Releases FAQs Concerning Implementation of Exchanges
On Nov. 29, 2011, HHS released 13 FAQs addressing implementation issues for states and federally facilitated exchanges.
The FAQs cover a range of topics, including funding responsibility and resources, information exchanges through federally
managed data “hubs,” and shared eligibility verification services. Among them are FAQs focused on issues raised by
federally facilitated exchanges.
FAQs (http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/files/Files2/11282011/exchange_q_and_a.pdf.pdf)
News Release (http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2011pres/11/20111129a.html)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FAQ Issued on Health Care Reform’s SBC Requirement
The DOL, HHS and IRS issued a new set of FAQs on Nov. 20, 2011, addressing PPACA’s summary of benefits and
coverage (SBC) requirement. The first section of the FAQs addresses the timing of the application of the SBC requirement,
since an applicability date beginning March 23, 2012, was initially proposed, but final regulations on the SBC requirement
have not yet been issued. The FAQ clarifies that since final regulations have not yet been issued on the SBC requirements,
plans and issuers are not yet required to comply. The FAQ notes that it is anticipated that the departments’ final
regulations, once issued, will include an applicability date that gives group health plans and health insurance issuers
sufficient time to comply.
FAQs (http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-aca7.html)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
HHS Suspends PPACA’s CLASS Program
On Oct. 14, 2011, HHS announced that it would halt implementation of the Community Living Assistance Services
and Supports (CLASS) Act under PPACA. Under the CLASS program, the Secretary of HHS was supposed to create
procedures and protocols establishing a national voluntary long-term care insurance program for purchasing community
living assistance services. To implement the program (which was to be done by Oct. 1, 2012), HHS was required to
develop at least three “actuarially sound” benefit plans that would remain solvent for 75 years. HHS cited actuarial and
solvency challenges as the reasons it had “not identified a way to make CLASS work at this time.”
HHS’ Report to Congress (http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2011/class/index.shtml)
HHS Secretary’s Cover Letter (http://www.hhs.gov/secretary/letter10142011.html)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. Page 7 of 8 Health Care Reform Quarterly Q4 2011
Institute of Medicine Releases Criteria for HHS to Develop Essential Benefits
Package Under PPACA
On Oct. 6, 2011, the Institute of Medicine (IOM), a federal advisory panel, released a 297-page report that set forth the
criteria that HHS should use in drafting the requirements relating to PPACA’s essential benefits package. HHS will follow,
with final regulations outlining the specific essential benefits requirements likely to be released next spring.
The IOM said HHS must consider both cost and effectiveness of the package, making affordability a key tool in the
decision-making process. The report laid out broad goals:
“The (package) must be affordable, maximize the number of people with insurance, protect the most vulnerable
individuals, promote better care, ensure stewardship of limited financial resources by focusing on high value services
of proven effectiveness, promote shared responsibility for improving our health, and address the medical concerns of
greatest importance to us all.”
When deciding on benefits, the panel said, HHS should take into account whether they would result in “meaningful
improvement in outcomes” and are “supported by a sufficient evidence base.”
The IOM stated that the packages should be defined initially by what is typical in the small employer market, and that
only medically necessary services should be covered. The IOM noted a strong preference for evidence-based medicine,
excluding experimental treatments. The IOM also recommended that the methodology include an initial determination of
the cost target followed by a determination of what services could be purchased within those cost constraints.
The rules will apply to all policies sold to individuals and small businesses within the state exchanges and the private
market. We are still waiting to see whether larger employers will be affected by the list of essential benefits in the form
of minimum essential coverage. The IOM said that the federal government should allow states that administer their own
exchanges to make changes to the list of essential benefits as long as those variations are consistent with PPACA and
are as comprehensive as the required benefits list. Under PPACA, states can continue to impose coverage requirements
not included in the essential benefits package — but they would be responsible for paying insurers the additional costs
for those benefits in policies sold through state exchanges.
The IOM recommended using a structured public process to identify priorities. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said
she will seek public comment before making any decisions.
IOM Report (http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Essential-Health-Benefits-Balancing-Coverage-and-Cost.aspx)
FreQueNtly aSked QueStioN
When do employers have to comply with the new automatic enrollment requirements imposed under PPACA?
PPACA amends the FLSA to require certain large employers to:
• Automatically enroll new full-time employees in one of the employer’s health benefit plans (subject to any waiting
period authorized by law);
• Continue the enrollment of current employees
Employers subject to the rule are those who 1) are subject to the FLSA, 2) have more than 200 full-time employees and
3) have one or more health benefit plans. Adequate notice must be provided, and employees who are automatically
enrolled must be given an opportunity to opt out of coverage.
PPACA does not specify an effective date for the automatic enrollment requirement. In sub-regulatory guidance though,
the DOL has indicated that employers are not required to comply with this requirement until regulations are issued, with
rulemaking expected to be completed by 2014.
EBSA issued a request for information in May 2011, and the rule is currently in the pre-rule stage. The DOL and the
U.S. Department of the Treasury will coordinate to develop the rules that apply in determining full-time employee
status for purposes of implementing the requirement. For more information, see “FAQs About Affordable Care Act
Implementation Part V,” Q/A-3, found at www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-aca5.html.
In the meantime, employers and administrators will need to assess the impact that automatic enrollment will have on
cafeteria plan elections and election change procedures.
For additional health-reform-related FAQs, ask your advisor for a copy of NFP’s “Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act FAQs.”