Ismailsaheb mulla 
law college satara
Presented by ……….. 
NLC – II 
SHITAL 
HAJRA 
PUNAM
INDIAN LEGAL HISTORY
JUDICIAL 
REFORMS 
OF 
WARREN 
HASTING
INTRODUCED 2 PLANS 
PLAN OF 1772 
& 
PLAN OF 
1774
PLAN OF 1772 
ADMNISTRATION OF JUSTICE 
CIVIL JUSTICE 
CRIMINAL 
JUSTICE 
REVENU 
ADMINISTRATION
CIVIL JUSTICE
MOFUSSIL DIWANI ADALAT 
 ESTABLISHED IN EACH 
DISTRICT AND PRESIDED BY 
COLLECTOR OF DISTRICT. 
 DECISION WAS FINAL UPTO 
Rs.500 AND VALUE OF SUIT MORE 
THAN THAT WERE HEARD BY 
SADAR DIWANI ADALAT. 
 EMPOWERED TO HEAR CIVIL 
CASES AND CASES OF 
INHERITANCE , MARRIAGE , etc., 
WERE TO BE DECIDED BY 
PERSONAL LAWS. 
 KAZIS AND PANDITS WERE 
APPOINTED TO EXPOUND 
MUSLINM AND HINDU LAWS.
 EMPOWERED TO HEAR 
APPEALS FROM MOFUSSIL 
DIWANI ADALAT. 
 IT WAS COURT OF SUPERIOR 
JURISDICTION. 
 IT CONSISTED GOVERNOR 
AND 2 MEMBERS OF COUNCIL. 
 ITS QUORUM WAS ABOUT 
3. 
 IT CONSISTED FEE OF 
ABOUT 5% TO BE PAID ON 
PETITION OF APPEALS.
 IT WAS ESTABLISHED IN 
EACH DISTRICT AND CASES 
WAS DECIDED ACCORDING TO 
MUSLIM LAW. 
 COLLECTOR WAS TO 
SUPERVISE THE WORKING OF 
COURT. 
 COULD NOT PASS CAPITAL 
SENTENCE WITHOUT 
APPROVAL OF SADAR 
FAUZDARI ADALAT.
SADAR FAUZDARI 
ADALAT 
 ESTABLISHED AT 
CALCUTTA AND HEAR 
APPEALS FROM MOFUSSIL 
DIWANI ADALAT. 
 PRESIDE OVER BY AN 
INDIAN JUDGE CALLD 
DAROGA-I-ADALAT. 
 DEATH WARRANT 
SIGNED BY NAWAB 
CONSIDRED AS THE HEAD 
OF THE FAUZDARI ADALAT.
 COLLECTOR OF DISTRICT WAS TO COLLECT 
LAND REVENUE FROM LAND OWNERS. 
 UNDER CONTROL AND SUPERVISION OF 
BOARD OF REVENUE.
PLAN OF 1774 
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE 
CIVIL JUSTICE 
CRIMINAL 
JUSTICE 
REVENUE 
ADMINISTRATION
CIVIL JUSTICE 
MOFUSSIL DIWANI ADALAT 
PROVINCIAL COUNCIL 
SADAR DIWANI ADALAT
PROVINCIAL COUNCIL 
PROVINCIAL COUNCIL 
 WE HAVE ALREADY DISCUSSED THE MOFUSSIL DIWANI AND SADAR DIWANI 
ADALAT IN PLAN OF 1772 BUT IN THIS PLAN OF 1774 HE HAS INTRODUCED THE 
NEW PROVINCIAL COUNCIL . 
 PROVINCIAL COUNCIL WAS ESTABLISHED IN EACH DIVISION. [DIVISION = 
SEVERAL DISTRICTS] 
 IN EACH DISTRICT INDIAN OFFICER CALLED ‘DIWAN’ OR ‘AMIN’ REPLACED 
THE COLLECTOR. 
 PROVINCIAL COUNCIL WAS TO LOOK AFTER REVENUE COLLECTION AND 
HEAR APPEALS FROM MOFUSSIL DIWANI ADALAT. 
 DECISION WAS FINAL UPTO Rs.1000 AND APPEALS FROM PROVINCIAL 
COUNCIL WERE TO BE HEARD BY SADAR DIWANI ADALAT.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE 
 SUPERVISION OF WORKING OF MOFUSSIL FAUZDARI ADALAT BY 
COLLECTOR AND SUPERVISION OF WORKING OF SADAR FAUZDARI 
ADALAT BY GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL CAME TO AN END. 
 SADAR FAUZDARI ADALAT SHIFTED FROM CALCUTTA – 
MURSHIDABAD.
IN THIS WAY WARREN HASTING CONTRIBUTED FOR THE 
IMPROVEMENT OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND THE 
BEST POINTS IN HIS PLANS WERE :- 
1. JUDICIAL 
ADMINISTRATION AS PUT IN 
HANDS OF AN INDIAN 
OFFICER [ENGLISH OFFICER 
REPLACED BY INDIAN] 
2. ESTABLISHMENT OF 
PROVINCIAL COUNCIL 
LESSENED BURDEN OF 
SADAR DIWANI ADALATAND 
REDUCED THE HARDSHIP OF 
LITIGANTS AND MADE 
JUSTICE CHEAPER.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH DEARS FOR 
VIEWING OUR EFFORTS SO OBEDIENTLY 
AND CO-OPERATIVELY

Hajrappt

  • 1.
    Ismailsaheb mulla lawcollege satara
  • 2.
    Presented by ……….. NLC – II SHITAL HAJRA PUNAM
  • 3.
  • 4.
    JUDICIAL REFORMS OF WARREN HASTING
  • 5.
    INTRODUCED 2 PLANS PLAN OF 1772 & PLAN OF 1774
  • 6.
    PLAN OF 1772 ADMNISTRATION OF JUSTICE CIVIL JUSTICE CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVENU ADMINISTRATION
  • 7.
  • 8.
    MOFUSSIL DIWANI ADALAT  ESTABLISHED IN EACH DISTRICT AND PRESIDED BY COLLECTOR OF DISTRICT.  DECISION WAS FINAL UPTO Rs.500 AND VALUE OF SUIT MORE THAN THAT WERE HEARD BY SADAR DIWANI ADALAT.  EMPOWERED TO HEAR CIVIL CASES AND CASES OF INHERITANCE , MARRIAGE , etc., WERE TO BE DECIDED BY PERSONAL LAWS.  KAZIS AND PANDITS WERE APPOINTED TO EXPOUND MUSLINM AND HINDU LAWS.
  • 9.
     EMPOWERED TOHEAR APPEALS FROM MOFUSSIL DIWANI ADALAT.  IT WAS COURT OF SUPERIOR JURISDICTION.  IT CONSISTED GOVERNOR AND 2 MEMBERS OF COUNCIL.  ITS QUORUM WAS ABOUT 3.  IT CONSISTED FEE OF ABOUT 5% TO BE PAID ON PETITION OF APPEALS.
  • 11.
     IT WASESTABLISHED IN EACH DISTRICT AND CASES WAS DECIDED ACCORDING TO MUSLIM LAW.  COLLECTOR WAS TO SUPERVISE THE WORKING OF COURT.  COULD NOT PASS CAPITAL SENTENCE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF SADAR FAUZDARI ADALAT.
  • 12.
    SADAR FAUZDARI ADALAT  ESTABLISHED AT CALCUTTA AND HEAR APPEALS FROM MOFUSSIL DIWANI ADALAT.  PRESIDE OVER BY AN INDIAN JUDGE CALLD DAROGA-I-ADALAT.  DEATH WARRANT SIGNED BY NAWAB CONSIDRED AS THE HEAD OF THE FAUZDARI ADALAT.
  • 13.
     COLLECTOR OFDISTRICT WAS TO COLLECT LAND REVENUE FROM LAND OWNERS.  UNDER CONTROL AND SUPERVISION OF BOARD OF REVENUE.
  • 14.
    PLAN OF 1774 ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE CIVIL JUSTICE CRIMINAL JUSTICE REVENUE ADMINISTRATION
  • 15.
    CIVIL JUSTICE MOFUSSILDIWANI ADALAT PROVINCIAL COUNCIL SADAR DIWANI ADALAT
  • 16.
    PROVINCIAL COUNCIL PROVINCIALCOUNCIL  WE HAVE ALREADY DISCUSSED THE MOFUSSIL DIWANI AND SADAR DIWANI ADALAT IN PLAN OF 1772 BUT IN THIS PLAN OF 1774 HE HAS INTRODUCED THE NEW PROVINCIAL COUNCIL .  PROVINCIAL COUNCIL WAS ESTABLISHED IN EACH DIVISION. [DIVISION = SEVERAL DISTRICTS]  IN EACH DISTRICT INDIAN OFFICER CALLED ‘DIWAN’ OR ‘AMIN’ REPLACED THE COLLECTOR.  PROVINCIAL COUNCIL WAS TO LOOK AFTER REVENUE COLLECTION AND HEAR APPEALS FROM MOFUSSIL DIWANI ADALAT.  DECISION WAS FINAL UPTO Rs.1000 AND APPEALS FROM PROVINCIAL COUNCIL WERE TO BE HEARD BY SADAR DIWANI ADALAT.
  • 17.
    CRIMINAL JUSTICE SUPERVISION OF WORKING OF MOFUSSIL FAUZDARI ADALAT BY COLLECTOR AND SUPERVISION OF WORKING OF SADAR FAUZDARI ADALAT BY GOVERNOR AND COUNCIL CAME TO AN END.  SADAR FAUZDARI ADALAT SHIFTED FROM CALCUTTA – MURSHIDABAD.
  • 18.
    IN THIS WAYWARREN HASTING CONTRIBUTED FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND THE BEST POINTS IN HIS PLANS WERE :- 1. JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION AS PUT IN HANDS OF AN INDIAN OFFICER [ENGLISH OFFICER REPLACED BY INDIAN] 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF PROVINCIAL COUNCIL LESSENED BURDEN OF SADAR DIWANI ADALATAND REDUCED THE HARDSHIP OF LITIGANTS AND MADE JUSTICE CHEAPER.
  • 20.
    THANK YOU VERYMUCH DEARS FOR VIEWING OUR EFFORTS SO OBEDIENTLY AND CO-OPERATIVELY