UEFA Euro 2016 France
Powered By
GERMANY
DEFENSIVE PROCESS REPORT
UEFA EURO 2016 - FRANCE
QUARTER-FINALS
UEFA Euro 2016 France
Powered By
WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA
vs Italy
INITIAL SYSTEM 1-3-5-2
06
23
07
11
01
Manuel NEUER
Goalkeeper
Man of the Match
05
08
17 04
2103
23
07
18
13
1
Tactical System
UEFA Euro 2016 France
Powered By
WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA
First Option
Dynamics
Germany needed to stop the fast transitions from Italy in
order to secure it’s defense.
Usually Germany shows up in a 1-4-3-3 tactical display,
with a lot of pressure in the defensive process.
Regarding the offensive process, Germany usually opts
to populate the space in the middle and between the
lines.
Against Italy, overcrowding the center would left empty
spaces in the areas that Italy uses to counter attack.
So Germany changed the system to a 1-3-5-2 in order to
control the wings in the counter attack.
UEFA Euro 2016 France
Powered By
WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA
Searching for Space
Dynamics
A 3-defender system creates more concentration in the
area.
Germany needed to control the 2 forwards and the 2
wingers whom gave Italy a lot of depth in the offensive
process – this was the biggest threat.
Germany still struggled when Italy changed the side very
quickly, specially Kimich on the right side.
UEFA Euro 2016 France
Powered By
WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA
Shooting Zone
Dynamics
Although some struggle to get the marking zones right,
they were really compact and basculated really well
along the game. With the support of the injured Khedira
and Schweinsteiger later, the 3 defenders defined the
pressure zones effectively.
Creating numeric advantage was essential to stop Italy,
and to be closer to the ball when it went on the wings.
This didn’t allow the italians to take advantage of the
space created.
UEFA Euro 2016 France
Powered By
WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA
Shots
Dynamics
Italy didn´t dominate the game but created a lot of shooting
opportunities.
As we can see, they tried with different players to variate
their game and creat more problems to Germany, often
with long shots, due to the lack of space in the danger
zones.
INFO@VIDEOBSERVER.COM
P. +351 213 530 196
WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COM

Germany Defensive Process Report - Euro 2016

  • 1.
    UEFA Euro 2016France Powered By GERMANY DEFENSIVE PROCESS REPORT UEFA EURO 2016 - FRANCE QUARTER-FINALS
  • 2.
    UEFA Euro 2016France Powered By WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA vs Italy INITIAL SYSTEM 1-3-5-2 06 23 07 11 01 Manuel NEUER Goalkeeper Man of the Match 05 08 17 04 2103 23 07 18 13 1 Tactical System
  • 3.
    UEFA Euro 2016France Powered By WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA First Option Dynamics Germany needed to stop the fast transitions from Italy in order to secure it’s defense. Usually Germany shows up in a 1-4-3-3 tactical display, with a lot of pressure in the defensive process. Regarding the offensive process, Germany usually opts to populate the space in the middle and between the lines. Against Italy, overcrowding the center would left empty spaces in the areas that Italy uses to counter attack. So Germany changed the system to a 1-3-5-2 in order to control the wings in the counter attack.
  • 4.
    UEFA Euro 2016France Powered By WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA Searching for Space Dynamics A 3-defender system creates more concentration in the area. Germany needed to control the 2 forwards and the 2 wingers whom gave Italy a lot of depth in the offensive process – this was the biggest threat. Germany still struggled when Italy changed the side very quickly, specially Kimich on the right side.
  • 5.
    UEFA Euro 2016France Powered By WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA Shooting Zone Dynamics Although some struggle to get the marking zones right, they were really compact and basculated really well along the game. With the support of the injured Khedira and Schweinsteiger later, the 3 defenders defined the pressure zones effectively. Creating numeric advantage was essential to stop Italy, and to be closer to the ball when it went on the wings. This didn’t allow the italians to take advantage of the space created.
  • 6.
    UEFA Euro 2016France Powered By WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COMANALYSIS BY MAURO SARAIVA Shots Dynamics Italy didn´t dominate the game but created a lot of shooting opportunities. As we can see, they tried with different players to variate their game and creat more problems to Germany, often with long shots, due to the lack of space in the danger zones.
  • 7.
    INFO@VIDEOBSERVER.COM P. +351 213530 196 WWW.VIDEOBSERVER.COM