The document discusses Fuji's new X-M1 mirrorless camera. It has the same 16MP APS-C X-Trans sensor as Fuji's high-end X-Pro 1 and X-E1 models, but with a newer processor. This gives the lower-cost X-M1 excellent image quality for its price point. While smaller than Fuji's other models, it lacks an EVF and has fewer controls. Compared to competitors like the Olympus E-PL5 and Sony NEX-5R, the X-M1 has similar specs but lower continuous shooting speeds. Its twin control dials are appreciated, and the tilting LCD screen matches competitors. In summary, the X-

2.  Fuji has been rather successful at competing at
the high-end mirrorless market place with their X-
series bodies (X-Pro 1 , X-E1 ). Their main driver
was the APS-C sensor that they claimed will
match the IQ of the full-frame sensor. In reality, it
didn’t quite reach that level, but nonetheless, most
reviewers have agreed that Fuji’s X-Trans sensor
is the best amongst all APS-C sensors

3.  Time has gone by, and this time, Fuji has
announced a new low-end model, based on the
same X-Trans sensor. This means now they have
a legitimate value model that offers the best IQ
outside of the full-frame territory. The X-M1 is
much more compact than either the X-E1 or X-Pro
1 . But they had to remove the EVF (pity), and
also couple of control wheels/buttons. Most
notably, the X-M1 now features a twin dials similar
to its competitors but different from its own
siblings.

4.  16MP X-Trans CMOS APS-C sensor, EXR Processor
II – the sensor is the same as the X-Pro 1 and the X-
E1 . But the processor appears to be different. X-E1
uses a processor called “EXR Pro”. Perhaps this is the
later generation processor which means it may
perform better in some ways.
 ISO 200-6400; L (100), H (12800) and H (ISO 25,600)
 Up to 5.6 fps continuous shooting – more a less the
same as the X-E1 , which is rated at 6fps. This
number lags significantly compare to its likely
competitors, Olympus E-PL5 (8 fps) and Sony NEX-
5R (10 fps).

5.  1920 x 1080 FullHD movie recording at 30 fps; built-in
stereo microphones – this has definitely improved over the
X-E1 , but no better than the Olympus E-PL5 . Sony NEX-
5R betters both by a good margin.
 Twin control dials, top and rear – this is very nice. Both the
Olympus E-PL5 and Sony NEX-5R don’t offer this. In fact,
to get this feature, you will need to upgrade to Olympus
OM-D E-M5 or Sony NEX-6 which are higher-end models
compare to the X-E1 .
 Focus ‘peaking’ display
 Face detection and subject-tracking AF modes
 920k dot 3″ 3:2 LCD display – tilts 120° upwards and 80°
downwards – obviously, the X-E1 ′s LCD doesn’t tilt. But its
competitors do tilt so finally Fuji is now up to par compare
to the competition.
 Built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer to smartphone, tablet or
PC

6.  In summary, the X-M1 XF 27mm f/2.8 is a very
interesting camera. But in reality, it must face a
tough competition and both of the competitors
offer better values. X-M1 will still win the IQ
award, but it will not match the lens selection of
the M43 system.

7.  In summary, the X-M1 XF 27mm f/2.8 is a very
interesting camera. But in reality, it must face a
tough competition and both of the competitors
offer better values. X-M1 will still win the IQ
award, but it will not match the lens selection of
the M43 system.