Final Assignment
Written assignment
Activity brief
BDI223 – Digital Leadership
Online campus
Professor: Bruno Gama | [email protected]
Description Each student should select a company for the final
assignment and submit it to the professor by March 12th,
2021. Based on the selected company, students should use
the concepts learnt in the course to apply digital strategies to
detect new digital trends and to develop the roadway to a
digital business transformation. Students should use the
digital mastery framework presented in the Webinar of week 8
as the basis to classify the company and to articulate the
roadmap for digital transformation.
Suggested structure:
1. Cover Page
2. Table of Contents
3. Executive Summary
4. Market Analysis and Digital Trends
5. Value Proposition of the Products / Services
6. Roadmap for Digital Transformation
7. Recommendations
8. References
Format This activity must meet the following formatting
requirements:
• Font size 12
• 1.5 line spacing
• 2,500 words (+/- 10%)
• Harvard Referencing System
Goal(s) The goals of this summative assessment are to gauge
students' comprehension of the materials presented, to
assess the ability of the students to apply the concepts in a
real case and to evaluate students’ learnings throughout the
course.
Due date Date: Friday, 7 May 2021
Time: 14:00 CET
Weight towards final
grade
This activity has a weight of 60% towards the final grade.
Learning outcomes The learning outcomes are:
• apply digital strategies to detect new digital trends
and opportunities.
• develop a roadmap for digital business
transformation.
Assessment criteria Please refer to the rubrics below.
Rubric: written assignment
Criteria Accomplished (A) Proficient (B) Partially proficient (C) Borderline (D) Fail (F)
Problem
identification
The business issue has been
correctly identified, with a
competent and comprehensive
explanation of key driving
forces and considerations.
Impact on company operations
has been correctly identified.
Thorough analysis of the issue
is presented.
The student correctly identified
the issue(s), taking into account
a variety of environmental and
contextual drivers. Key case
information has been identified
and analyzed.
The student correctly identified
the case (issues), considering
obvious
environmental/contextual
drivers. There is evidence of
analysis, but it lacks depth.
The student correctly identified
the issue(s) but analysis was
weak. An absence of context –
the work is basically descriptive
with little analysis.
The student failed to correctly
identify the issue(s); analysis
was incorrect or too superficial
to be of use; information was
misinterpreted.
Information
gathering
The student showed skill in
gathering information and
analyzing it for the purposes of
filling the information gaps
identified. Comprehensive and
relevant.
Relevant information gaps were ...