The New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has targeted the daily fantasy sports sites DraftKings and FanDuel, alleging they are operating an illegal gambling scheme. This has sparked controversy as many fantasy sports players believe the sites offer a game of skill rather than chance. Opinions on the Attorney General's actions are mixed, with some supporting regulation but others believing the government should not interfere with private citizens' fantasy sports activity.
SCOTUS Launches New Economy with Legalized Sports BettingMSL
In a 6-3 decision in the case Murphy vs. National Collegiate Athletic Association, SCOTUS ruled that because Congress exceeded its constitutional authority when it passed PAPSA. In essence, Congress tried to prohibit state legislatures from repealing their existing statues that outlawed sports betting. Under a line of Supreme Court precedent known as the anti-commandeering doctrine, federal efforts to coerce states into enforcing federal law are unconstitutional violations of the Tenth Amendment.
To say this is just the beginning would be cliché, but what SCOTUS has wrought with its decision will have lasting consequences that go far beyond sports betting.
The RE Investment News is the monthly newsletter publication from Mid-America Association of Real Estate Investors. MAREI has been serving real estate investors in the Kanas City Metro and across the country with networking, education, and benefits since 2004. Learn more on www.MAREI.org.
SCOTUS Launches New Economy with Legalized Sports BettingMSL
In a 6-3 decision in the case Murphy vs. National Collegiate Athletic Association, SCOTUS ruled that because Congress exceeded its constitutional authority when it passed PAPSA. In essence, Congress tried to prohibit state legislatures from repealing their existing statues that outlawed sports betting. Under a line of Supreme Court precedent known as the anti-commandeering doctrine, federal efforts to coerce states into enforcing federal law are unconstitutional violations of the Tenth Amendment.
To say this is just the beginning would be cliché, but what SCOTUS has wrought with its decision will have lasting consequences that go far beyond sports betting.
The RE Investment News is the monthly newsletter publication from Mid-America Association of Real Estate Investors. MAREI has been serving real estate investors in the Kanas City Metro and across the country with networking, education, and benefits since 2004. Learn more on www.MAREI.org.
The maximum minimumNational Review, July 6, 2015 Every poli.docxcherry686017
The maximum minimum
National Review, July 6, 2015
Every political season, Democrats argue for higher minimum wages. Republicans respond by citing all of the evidence that higher minimum wages are harmful. Democratic voters get charged up and swing voters conclude that Republicans are heartless. It is the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats, but the curse that keeps on afflicting those below the poverty line who lose their jobs because of it.
Though Hillary Clinton has made it clear that she is going to play this game, much of the action is coming from around the country, where America's progressive mayors have taken this form of government price-setting to new heights. In Los Angeles, Mayor Eric Garcetti recently signed legislation that would raise the minimum wage in the city to $15 by 2020. And this move in Los Angeles comes on the heels of Seattle's and San Francisco's adoption of the same policy.
The evidence is clear about whether raising the minimum wage is an effective way to help poor people: It is not. As Richard V Burkhauser and T. Aldrich Finegan note in the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, those living in poverty get such a vanishingly low fraction of the benefits of a minimum-wage increase that "it is not clear that increases in the minimum wage make good policy even if no jobs are lost as a result."
As we prepare for the umpteenth political season pitting Democratic populism against a preponderance of economic evidence, let us pause and pursue the deep and enduring wisdom obtainable only through abstraction. The nearby chart takes the argument of minimum-wage proponents to its logical extreme. Suppose we grant that corporations are evil. Suppose we also grant that the only way we can improve the welfare of the poor is to redistribute by taking all of the money from the evil corporations and giving it to the working masses.
This chart transports us to this redistributive nirvana, where the government has decided to seize all of the corporate profits in the land and give them to workers. Assume, contrary to sound economic thinking and common sense, that companies continue to operate exactly as they do today, suffering no negative effects from these confiscatory taxes. How large an increase in wages can this progressive utopia finance?
To answer this question, we gathered data on after-tax corporate profits from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. We then gathered data on average hours worked per week per nonfarm employee from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and transformed these weekly data into data on the aggregate number of yearly hours worked by all nonfarm employees. Finally, we divided quarterly corporate profits by the aggregate number of hours worked by nonfarm employees over the same period, labeling this value the "expropriation subsidy" on the chart. To get an idea of how much of a perhour wage increase this policy could create, simply add the values of the two lines at a point in time.
As the c ...
The maximum minimumNational Review, July 6, 2015 Every poli.docxcherry686017
The maximum minimum
National Review, July 6, 2015
Every political season, Democrats argue for higher minimum wages. Republicans respond by citing all of the evidence that higher minimum wages are harmful. Democratic voters get charged up and swing voters conclude that Republicans are heartless. It is the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats, but the curse that keeps on afflicting those below the poverty line who lose their jobs because of it.
Though Hillary Clinton has made it clear that she is going to play this game, much of the action is coming from around the country, where America's progressive mayors have taken this form of government price-setting to new heights. In Los Angeles, Mayor Eric Garcetti recently signed legislation that would raise the minimum wage in the city to $15 by 2020. And this move in Los Angeles comes on the heels of Seattle's and San Francisco's adoption of the same policy.
The evidence is clear about whether raising the minimum wage is an effective way to help poor people: It is not. As Richard V Burkhauser and T. Aldrich Finegan note in the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, those living in poverty get such a vanishingly low fraction of the benefits of a minimum-wage increase that "it is not clear that increases in the minimum wage make good policy even if no jobs are lost as a result."
As we prepare for the umpteenth political season pitting Democratic populism against a preponderance of economic evidence, let us pause and pursue the deep and enduring wisdom obtainable only through abstraction. The nearby chart takes the argument of minimum-wage proponents to its logical extreme. Suppose we grant that corporations are evil. Suppose we also grant that the only way we can improve the welfare of the poor is to redistribute by taking all of the money from the evil corporations and giving it to the working masses.
This chart transports us to this redistributive nirvana, where the government has decided to seize all of the corporate profits in the land and give them to workers. Assume, contrary to sound economic thinking and common sense, that companies continue to operate exactly as they do today, suffering no negative effects from these confiscatory taxes. How large an increase in wages can this progressive utopia finance?
To answer this question, we gathered data on after-tax corporate profits from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. We then gathered data on average hours worked per week per nonfarm employee from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and transformed these weekly data into data on the aggregate number of yearly hours worked by all nonfarm employees. Finally, we divided quarterly corporate profits by the aggregate number of hours worked by nonfarm employees over the same period, labeling this value the "expropriation subsidy" on the chart. To get an idea of how much of a perhour wage increase this policy could create, simply add the values of the two lines at a point in time.
As the c ...
1. FantasySportsVS.sTateAttorneyGeneral
Fans of fantasy sports leagues may be
looking at a huge crisis in the industry. The
industry’s future is in the New York State
Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s hands.
This ongoing issue has been covered by
many news corporations, and it has raised
lots of controversy since the issue has
grabbed the public’s attention. In a N.Y.
Times article written by Walt Bogdanich, Joe Drape, and Jacqueline Willamsnov, the
Attorney General released a statement that targeted DraftKings and FanDuel. In his
statement Mr. Schneiderman stated, “It is clear that DraftKings and FanDuel are the
leaders of a massive, multibillion-dollar scheme intended to evade the law and fleece
sports fans across the country.” According to the Times article, Mr. Schneiderman
also said, “Today we have sent a clear message: not in New York, and not on my
watch.” It is clear that the Attorney General believes he has New York State’s best
interest in mind, but not everyone agrees with his decision.
According to CNBC, “Fantasy sports are big business, with billions of dollars
wagered every year. But there is a thin line between legal -skilled based gaming and
illegal gambling. The words “gamble” and “gambling” are generally use to discuss an
activity that may run afoul of applicable criminal laws. Gambling in general can
become a criminal activity, but fantasy sports are not considered a gambling issue
because the players are actual sports fans. The sports industry has many different
aspects to it and fantasy sports are a large part of it. Another important thing to
understand about this part of the sports industry is the ideology of backup
withholding tax. According to irs.gov, a backup withholding tax is, “An IRS procedure
designed to ensure that a taxpayer who does not have a Social Security number or
tax identification number will still have taxes withheld on his/her income.” This very
serious legal issue and the fantasy sports industry intend to uphold it. In fact FanDuel
says, “By depositing money or entering a contest, you are representing and
warranting that you are not subject to backup withholding tax.” This action
disproves the Attorney General’s allegation towards the fantasy sports industry
because it clearly shows that they are abiding by the law.
There are over 500,000 daily users of the fantasy sports league, so it is only right
that these organizations not back down. The DraftKings organization sent out an
email to all their users, saying, “Schneiderman is considering preventing New Yorkers
from playing daily fantasy sports.” A spokeswoman from the DraftKings organization
2. also releases a statement that targeted the Attorney General’s actions. Sabrina
Macias stated the following, “We are disappointed he has hasn’t taken the time to
meet with us or ask us any questions about our business model before his opinion.”
On Friday, November 13, 2015, the fantasy giants FanDuel and DraftKings fired back
at the Attorney General by filing petitions. According to ESPN, the two companies
took turns at attacking him for his allegations.
In their petition DraftKings called Schneiderman's actions to cease taking business from
customers in New York a "shocking overreach." DraftKings is a legitimate industry that
provided their customers with satisfaction and in their petition they state that, “He has
unleashed an irresponsible, irrational and illegal campaign to destroy a legitimate industry."
This may cause confusion to the general public because now there isn’t a clear
understanding of where the Attorney General stands on the issue. One person who is a daily
user of these fantasy sport corporations is WilliamA. Carey, Jr. and he has a strong opinion
on the issue. Mr. Carey is a high school coach at Academy of American Studies, and he does
not like the action that Schneiderman is taking because he says, “I feel that the Attorney
General is overstepping his boundaries. I understand the need for them to step in due to
their lack of knowledge; however, due to the fact that the outcome of the game plays no
major role in the playing of the game it should not be deemed illegal gambling.” Carey, Jr.
makes an interesting statement by saying, “I feel that they are stepping in, in order to begin
the process of making money for the State through taxation. The only reason I would want
the state to step in is to control the rules and regulation.” Like many others this fantasy
player believes that the government should stay out of issues like this one. As matter of fact
he stated, “I would try to fight against the system, first of all because I like the games itself
and believe that it is wholesome fun that isn't like gambling, and also because the
government shouldn't be able to step in with things they do not understand.”
Another person who has taken a stance against the Attorney General’s action is David
Hage. Mr. Hage does not have experience with fantasy sport games, but his opinion is very
important because he is a former journalist who used to work for Independent Magazine,
which is a small magazine company in Luzerne County, P.A. David Hage says, “I do believe
that the Attorney State General is abusing his power. If there is no victim, than there is no
crime in my opinion. In a world with so many violent people who commit atrocities against
fellow American citizen's wasting time on fantasy sports is a foolish use of time and
resources.” There is no harm in this part of the sports industry because players don’t cause
harm and the government should focus on bigger issues. That is exactly what Hage talked
about when he made the following statement; “The attorney general continues the trend of
overreaching his power, as does the majority of those in power within the Federal
government. A constitutional republic such as ours seeks to limit the power of government
representatives. Fantasy football companies should be allowed to operate in peace. They
should pay their taxes and be left alone.” He also stated, “The Attorney General should back
off. It is not the role of the government to pick winners and losers. If society wants to
gamble in fantasy sports, let them…. It is none of the government’s business what private
citizens do, as long as it doesn’t hurt others.”
3. To put it in the government point of view, a retired high school U.S history teacher
decided to add his take on the issue. Steven Karp states that, “The Attorney General,
Schneiderman, has the burden of proving that laws were broken. The sports fantasy
companies have proven they are doing everything legally and that no one working for
them had access to making picks.” Mr.Karp has a different view on whether or not
gambling is harmless because he looks at the issue from a different angle. Mr.Karp
says, “People say gambling is a victimless crime, meaning the only one harm is the
player…But gambling is big money. If people are cheating, then that’s money that is
being taken from people that are playing fairly.” Even though he said that, he has an
interesting comment, “I don’t think this is the most important thing Mr.
Schneiderman has to worry about, but a very large part of his job is to make sure that
companies don’t take advantage of costumers.” This is a very complex issue that
apparently sparks a lot of concerns for fantasy sports’ players.
New York is a diverse city and when it comes to issues like this one, controversy
become a strong driving force to keep the media going. In a city like New York,
sports are a big deal and fantasy sports is an extension for fans to express their
understanding and love for the sports they base their fantasy team around. This is an
interesting part of the sports industry and it shouldn’t be shut down because it
impacts a large amount of people. -Vijai Naraine