Exploiting the Testing System
•Download as PPT, PDF•
0 likes•413 views
The document discusses different types of antivirus testing methods and potential ways to exploit weaknesses in those methods. It describes "wildcore" testing using real malware samples and "zoo" testing using large malware collections. It also outlines "retrospective" testing using older signature databases. The document suggests hacks like automatically signing samples, customizing settings, and detecting other antivirus products' false positives to manipulate test results. Feedback from the antivirus industry is mixed, with some condoning common practices while others find them problematic.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![Contents ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Avc rem 201211_en
This document summarizes the results of a malware removal test conducted by AV-Comparatives in October 2012. 14 antivirus products were tested on their ability to remove malware from an infected system. The test found that Bitdefender, Kaspersky, and Panda achieved the highest ADVANCED+ rating, demonstrating reliable malware removal with only negligible traces left behind. Most other products received lower ratings, with some only partially removing malware or leaving problematic issues. The test provides a useful evaluation of how effectively different antivirus software can clean an infected computer.
Avc fd mar2012_intl_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus test conducted in March 2012. 20 anti-virus products were tested on their ability to detect malware. G Data had the highest detection rate at 99.7%, while AhnLab had the lowest at 94%. Microsoft had the fewest false positives at 0, while Webroot had the most at 428. Based on detection rates and false positives, products received awards of Advanced+, Advanced, Standard or Tested. G Data, AVIRA and Kaspersky received Advanced+.
Avc fd mar2012_intl_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus test conducted in March 2012. 20 anti-virus products were tested on their ability to detect malware. G Data detected 99.7% of malware samples, scoring highest. Microsoft detected 93.1% of samples, scoring lowest. The test also evaluated false alarms on clean files. Microsoft generated 0 false alarms, while Webroot generated 428 false alarms, the most of any product. Based on detection rates and false alarms, products received awards of Advanced+, Advanced, Standard or Tested.
Avc fdt 201303_en
The document summarizes the results of an anti-virus file detection test conducted in March 2013 by AV-Comparatives on 20 antivirus products. It found that G DATA 2013 detected 99.9% of malware files with few false alarms, earning it the top award level. Microsoft Security Essentials detected 92% of malware with very few false alarms. Overall detection rates ranged from 99.9% to 91.2%, and false alarms ranged from 0 to 38 across the tested products. The test aimed to evaluate how well products can distinguish malware from good files through detection rates and false alarm results.
Malware Removal Test OCT 2009
Malware Removal Test. Language : English. September 2009. Last Revision : 24th October 2009. www.av-comparatives.org
Avc fdt 201209_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus file detection test conducted in September 2012. 20 major anti-virus products were tested on their ability to detect malware in a set of over 240,000 recent malicious files. G DATA detected 99.9% of the malware and had few false alarms. Webroot detected below 80% of malware and had many false alarms. The results showed detection rates and false alarms for each product, with the products ranked and receiving awards based on their combined performance.
Avc Report25
This document summarizes the results of an on-demand malware detection test conducted by AV-Comparatives in February 2010. 20 antivirus products were tested on their ability to detect malware samples from a set containing over 1.2 million files. The summary includes detection rates for each product, with G DATA, AVIRA, and Panda detecting over 99% of malware. It also includes false positive results, with eScan, F-Secure, and others having very few false alarms. Finally, it shows the award levels reached by each product based on detection and false alarms, with some products reaching the highest ADVANCED+ level.
Avc beh 201207_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus comparative retrospective test conducted in March 2012 that evaluated the abilities of various anti-virus programs to detect new malware through heuristic detection before signature updates as well as behavioral protections after execution; over 4,000 new malware samples from around March 2nd 2012 were used in the test which evaluated 17 anti-virus programs with the results showing the detection rates for scanning and any additional protection provided by behavioral analysis after execution.
Recommended
Avc rem 201211_en
This document summarizes the results of a malware removal test conducted by AV-Comparatives in October 2012. 14 antivirus products were tested on their ability to remove malware from an infected system. The test found that Bitdefender, Kaspersky, and Panda achieved the highest ADVANCED+ rating, demonstrating reliable malware removal with only negligible traces left behind. Most other products received lower ratings, with some only partially removing malware or leaving problematic issues. The test provides a useful evaluation of how effectively different antivirus software can clean an infected computer.
Avc fd mar2012_intl_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus test conducted in March 2012. 20 anti-virus products were tested on their ability to detect malware. G Data had the highest detection rate at 99.7%, while AhnLab had the lowest at 94%. Microsoft had the fewest false positives at 0, while Webroot had the most at 428. Based on detection rates and false positives, products received awards of Advanced+, Advanced, Standard or Tested. G Data, AVIRA and Kaspersky received Advanced+.
Avc fd mar2012_intl_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus test conducted in March 2012. 20 anti-virus products were tested on their ability to detect malware. G Data detected 99.7% of malware samples, scoring highest. Microsoft detected 93.1% of samples, scoring lowest. The test also evaluated false alarms on clean files. Microsoft generated 0 false alarms, while Webroot generated 428 false alarms, the most of any product. Based on detection rates and false alarms, products received awards of Advanced+, Advanced, Standard or Tested.
Avc fdt 201303_en
The document summarizes the results of an anti-virus file detection test conducted in March 2013 by AV-Comparatives on 20 antivirus products. It found that G DATA 2013 detected 99.9% of malware files with few false alarms, earning it the top award level. Microsoft Security Essentials detected 92% of malware with very few false alarms. Overall detection rates ranged from 99.9% to 91.2%, and false alarms ranged from 0 to 38 across the tested products. The test aimed to evaluate how well products can distinguish malware from good files through detection rates and false alarm results.
Malware Removal Test OCT 2009
Malware Removal Test. Language : English. September 2009. Last Revision : 24th October 2009. www.av-comparatives.org
Avc fdt 201209_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus file detection test conducted in September 2012. 20 major anti-virus products were tested on their ability to detect malware in a set of over 240,000 recent malicious files. G DATA detected 99.9% of the malware and had few false alarms. Webroot detected below 80% of malware and had many false alarms. The results showed detection rates and false alarms for each product, with the products ranked and receiving awards based on their combined performance.
Avc Report25
This document summarizes the results of an on-demand malware detection test conducted by AV-Comparatives in February 2010. 20 antivirus products were tested on their ability to detect malware samples from a set containing over 1.2 million files. The summary includes detection rates for each product, with G DATA, AVIRA, and Panda detecting over 99% of malware. It also includes false positive results, with eScan, F-Secure, and others having very few false alarms. Finally, it shows the award levels reached by each product based on detection and false alarms, with some products reaching the highest ADVANCED+ level.
Avc beh 201207_en
This document summarizes the results of an anti-virus comparative retrospective test conducted in March 2012 that evaluated the abilities of various anti-virus programs to detect new malware through heuristic detection before signature updates as well as behavioral protections after execution; over 4,000 new malware samples from around March 2nd 2012 were used in the test which evaluated 17 anti-virus programs with the results showing the detection rates for scanning and any additional protection provided by behavioral analysis after execution.
The VTC experience
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Prof. Dr. Klaus Brunnstein, University of Hamburg, Germany
The Difference between Track and Testing Performance
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Roel Schouwenberg, Senior Antivirus Researcher, Kaspersky Lab Benelux.
2010-03-31 - VU Amsterdam - Experiences testing safety critical systems
1) Testing safety critical systems is challenging because software often contains errors and failures can have catastrophic consequences, so systems must be designed and tested to extremely high standards of reliability.
2) The document discusses standards like IEC 61508 that provide requirements for safety integrity levels and risk management in developing safety critical systems.
3) Rigorous verification techniques are needed including reviews, static analysis, unit testing with high code coverage, integration testing of components, system testing of full environments, and acceptance testing of real systems.
Test Strategies & Common Mistakes
The document discusses strategies for evaluating antivirus software programs, including testing detection rates against malware databases, assessing false positives using clean files, and examining prevention and cleaning capabilities by attempting to infect systems. It also covers documenting test results, providing developers review opportunities, and creating cross-reference lists to standardize malware naming between different antivirus products.
Java Unit Test and Coverage Introduction
The document provides an introduction to Java unit testing and code coverage. It discusses test-driven development and the JUnit testing framework, including annotations, test results, and Ant integration. It also covers using mock objects with Mockito, performing code coverage analysis, and code coverage tools like Emma and Cobertura.
Active Testing
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Mark Kennedy, Distinguished Engineer, Symantec
Automatic Fine-Grained Issue Report Reclassification
Our approach extracts various feature values from a
bug report and predicts if a bug report needs to be reclassified and its reclassified category.
Mutation Testing: The Swiss army knife of Testing
This document discusses mutation testing and its benefits. Mutation testing works by making small changes or mutations to a program and determining whether existing tests can detect the changes, otherwise known as killing the mutants. Even after achieving 100% branch coverage, mutation testing can find bugs missed by branch coverage alone and lead to improvements in source code and test code quality during the analysis of mutants. The major mutation testing tool is Major and more tools can be found online. Mutation testing can be applied at different testing levels and is superior to other criteria for evaluating test quality.
Final frontier testinginproduction
No tester wants to hear a developer say “It works on my machine!” because what it actually says is: “Since it worked on my development environment I assume it also works on your test environment hence you cannot possibly have found a bug."
We know this not to be true, yet make the same assumption between environments in a later stage: We test our software on test environments and assume that our test results carry over to production. We are actually not testing the software in the setting where our users are facing it.
To top it off, we spend a considerable amount of money trying to copy production. Managing test environments is often hard, complex and needs a lot of maintenance effort.
A lot of people are already using techniques, which take testing into production like Beta Testing, A/B Testing or Monitoring as Testing. We intend to push the envelope a little further and additionally move acceptance testing, automated checks or exploration to the production stage. To do so we need to take several things into consideration, such as making sure test data does not mess up productive data and analytics, as well as hiding untested features from customers.
In this talk you will learn about popular testing in production techniques. We also want to show you some strategies, which help tackling common constraints you will face and provide you with an approach to gradually shift your testing to production.
Sorting Out The Trash
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Michael St. Neitzel, Senior Antivirus Architect, FRISK Software
Testing In Java
The document summarizes a presentation on software testing concepts and practices like test-driven development, terminology used in testing, popular tools used for testing, and resources for learning more about testing. The presentation covered topics like unit testing, integration testing, test-driven development principles and practices, popular IDEs, build tools, testing frameworks, mock object libraries, code coverage tools, load testing tools, acceptance testing tools, and continuous integration tools. It also demonstrated testing using an open-source medical record system.
Lecture5 2
This document discusses different techniques for validating software, including testing, verification, and analysis. It describes how testing can find problems but not prove a program works due to the impossibility of exhaustive testing. Black-box and glass-box testing techniques are explained for selectively testing high probability paths. The document also notes that while analysis can in theory increase confidence by examining code, proving properties of arbitrary programs is impossible due to problems like the halting problem. Automated tools have limitations like unsoundness and incompleteness, so informal reasoning and modularity are compromises.
[TestWarez 2017] Okiem testera – tam gdzie hardware łączy się z softwarem
[TestWarez 2017] Okiem testera – tam gdzie hardware łączy się z softwaremStowarzyszenie Jakości Systemów Informatycznych (SJSI)
Mało kto zastanawia się, jak przebiega proces produkcji układów mikroelektronicznych z punktu widzenia zapewnienia jakości finalnego produktu. Coraz większe projekty wymuszają ciągły i bardzo dynamiczny rozwój dziedziny znanej jako DFT (design for testability), ale i narzędzi wspomagających cały proces testowy. W ramach prezentacji przedstawione zostaną podstawowe koncepty wykorzystywane przez największe firmy produkujące układy mikroelektroniczne, jak i problemy, z którymi należy się zmierzyć, by zapewnić wysoką jakość komercyjnego oprogramowania.
Specyfika oprogramowania tworzonego do testowania układów mikroelektoronicznych wykorzystywanych w urządzeniach powszechnego użytku różni się od klasycznych aplikacji desktopowych, jak i mobilnych. Bardzo duża dynamika rynku, zgodna z prawem Moore’a powoduje, że z roku na rok wymagania stawiane przed narzędziami wspomagającymi proces implementacji ciągle się zmienia. Wszystko to warunkuje sposób, w jaki należy podejść do testowania tego typu programów, jak rozwijać w pełni zautomatyzowaną infrastrukturę testową, pozwalającą zarządzać dziesiątkami tysięcy testów regresyjnych analizowanymi codziennie.Software testing basics and its types
This document discusses software testing techniques. It describes different types of testing like unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and regression testing. It also discusses test case selection strategies like boundary value analysis, risk-based testing, state-based testing and operational profile testing. Other topics covered include test automation, test oracles, white-box and black-box testing.
The Death of Flaky Tests by Dave Haeffner
Dave Haeffner is here to bury flaky tests, not to praise them.
For far too long we have allowed flaky tests to live in our world, creeping in and eroding the trust in our Selenium tests. They have wrought unreliable test results, noise, and ultimately an infinite amount of time wasted throughout our industry. Some blame Selenium for this. Others point a finger at the browser vendors. Some call out either instabilities in their Application Under Test or poor design practices in their test code.
Flaky Tests are often talked about in whispers, and ultimately accepted as a part of reality that we cannot control.
Dave says it’s time for a revolution! Join him in this SauceCon 2018 presentation as he shows you how to take the power back from Flaky Tests and end their reign once and for all.
Design For Testability
"To be tested a system has to be designed to be tested"
Eberhardt Rechtin, The Art Of System Architecting
Testing is one of the main activities through which we gather data to assess the quality of our software; this makes testability an important attribute of software--not only for development, but also for maintenance and bug fixing.
Design for testability is a term that has its origin in hardware design, where the concept was introduced in order to make it easier testing circuits while reducing the costs of doing so.
In this talk I'll show how to translate this concept to the software domain along with the consequences on various aspects of the development activities, both from the technical point of view (e.g., design, code quality, choice of frameworks, etc.), and the product management point of view (e.g., management of team dependencies, delivery time, costs, etc.). I'll provide examples based on real world experience, both for the technical and the management aspects.
SurfClipse-- An IDE based context-aware Meta Search Engine
Despite various debugging supports of the existing IDEs for programming errors and exceptions, software developers often look at web for working solutions or any up-to-date information. Traditional web search does not consider thecontext of the problems that they search solutions for, and thus it often does not help much in problem solving. In this paper, we propose a context-aware meta search tool, SurfClipse, that analyzes an encountered exception andits context in the IDE, and recommends not only suitable search queries but also relevant web pages for the exception (and its context). The tool collects results from three popular search engines and a programming Q & A site against the exception in the IDE, refines the results for relevance against the context of the exception, and then ranks them before recommendation. It provides two working modes--interactive and proactive to meet the versatile needs of the developers, and one can browse the result pages using a customized embedded browser provided by the tool.
AV-Comparatives Performance Test
This document summarizes the results of a performance test of 19 antivirus products conducted in October 2012. A variety of common computer tasks were performed on a test system with each antivirus product installed to measure the impact on system performance. The tested products achieved different award levels based on their results. Users are advised to consider how antivirus products may impact system performance when choosing security software.
TEA Presentation V 0.3
This document discusses test escape analysis (TEA), which analyzes defects that escaped testing to help improve testing efficiency. TEA examines past defects to identify patterns and trends, such as which test types or techniques could have caught which defects earlier. The benefits of early defect detection through improved testing are reduced costs, reputation, and engineer workload. TEA data from defect histories can show where to apply testing resources and procedure changes for maximum return.
Visual Regression Testing
This document provides an overview of visual regression testing using the Galen framework. It discusses topics like change blindness, why visual regression tests are important, how Galen works, the basics of Galen including commands, specification files and reports. It also covers challenges like dynamic content and addressing them, image comparison configuration, and generating reports.
System testing
The document discusses different strategies for system testing including top-down and bottom-up approaches. It emphasizes the importance of thorough testing that covers all logical paths and edge cases. Both black box and white box testing methods are outlined. Test planning should include test objectives, procedures, inputs, expected outputs, and analysis of results. Thorough testing of up to 50% of development time may be needed. Different categories of test data including normal, extreme, and exceptional cases should be used.
System Testing of Timing Requirements based on Use Cases and Timed Automata
The document describes a technique called TAUC that combines use case specifications and timed automata to automatically generate test cases for validating timing requirements of safety-critical systems. TAUC models the system functionality and environment as timed automata, identifies test inputs from use case scenarios to trigger state transitions, and employs a coverage-based and metaheuristic search approach to generate a test suite that stresses timing constraints. An evaluation on a case study shows TAUC achieves a 91% fault detection rate, significantly outperforming random and manual testing.
More Related Content
What's hot
The VTC experience
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Prof. Dr. Klaus Brunnstein, University of Hamburg, Germany
The Difference between Track and Testing Performance
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Roel Schouwenberg, Senior Antivirus Researcher, Kaspersky Lab Benelux.
2010-03-31 - VU Amsterdam - Experiences testing safety critical systems
1) Testing safety critical systems is challenging because software often contains errors and failures can have catastrophic consequences, so systems must be designed and tested to extremely high standards of reliability.
2) The document discusses standards like IEC 61508 that provide requirements for safety integrity levels and risk management in developing safety critical systems.
3) Rigorous verification techniques are needed including reviews, static analysis, unit testing with high code coverage, integration testing of components, system testing of full environments, and acceptance testing of real systems.
Test Strategies & Common Mistakes
The document discusses strategies for evaluating antivirus software programs, including testing detection rates against malware databases, assessing false positives using clean files, and examining prevention and cleaning capabilities by attempting to infect systems. It also covers documenting test results, providing developers review opportunities, and creating cross-reference lists to standardize malware naming between different antivirus products.
Java Unit Test and Coverage Introduction
The document provides an introduction to Java unit testing and code coverage. It discusses test-driven development and the JUnit testing framework, including annotations, test results, and Ant integration. It also covers using mock objects with Mockito, performing code coverage analysis, and code coverage tools like Emma and Cobertura.
Active Testing
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Mark Kennedy, Distinguished Engineer, Symantec
Automatic Fine-Grained Issue Report Reclassification
Our approach extracts various feature values from a
bug report and predicts if a bug report needs to be reclassified and its reclassified category.
Mutation Testing: The Swiss army knife of Testing
This document discusses mutation testing and its benefits. Mutation testing works by making small changes or mutations to a program and determining whether existing tests can detect the changes, otherwise known as killing the mutants. Even after achieving 100% branch coverage, mutation testing can find bugs missed by branch coverage alone and lead to improvements in source code and test code quality during the analysis of mutants. The major mutation testing tool is Major and more tools can be found online. Mutation testing can be applied at different testing levels and is superior to other criteria for evaluating test quality.
Final frontier testinginproduction
No tester wants to hear a developer say “It works on my machine!” because what it actually says is: “Since it worked on my development environment I assume it also works on your test environment hence you cannot possibly have found a bug."
We know this not to be true, yet make the same assumption between environments in a later stage: We test our software on test environments and assume that our test results carry over to production. We are actually not testing the software in the setting where our users are facing it.
To top it off, we spend a considerable amount of money trying to copy production. Managing test environments is often hard, complex and needs a lot of maintenance effort.
A lot of people are already using techniques, which take testing into production like Beta Testing, A/B Testing or Monitoring as Testing. We intend to push the envelope a little further and additionally move acceptance testing, automated checks or exploration to the production stage. To do so we need to take several things into consideration, such as making sure test data does not mess up productive data and analytics, as well as hiding untested features from customers.
In this talk you will learn about popular testing in production techniques. We also want to show you some strategies, which help tackling common constraints you will face and provide you with an approach to gradually shift your testing to production.
Sorting Out The Trash
Presented at the International Antivirus Testing Workshop 2007 by Michael St. Neitzel, Senior Antivirus Architect, FRISK Software
Testing In Java
The document summarizes a presentation on software testing concepts and practices like test-driven development, terminology used in testing, popular tools used for testing, and resources for learning more about testing. The presentation covered topics like unit testing, integration testing, test-driven development principles and practices, popular IDEs, build tools, testing frameworks, mock object libraries, code coverage tools, load testing tools, acceptance testing tools, and continuous integration tools. It also demonstrated testing using an open-source medical record system.
Lecture5 2
This document discusses different techniques for validating software, including testing, verification, and analysis. It describes how testing can find problems but not prove a program works due to the impossibility of exhaustive testing. Black-box and glass-box testing techniques are explained for selectively testing high probability paths. The document also notes that while analysis can in theory increase confidence by examining code, proving properties of arbitrary programs is impossible due to problems like the halting problem. Automated tools have limitations like unsoundness and incompleteness, so informal reasoning and modularity are compromises.
[TestWarez 2017] Okiem testera – tam gdzie hardware łączy się z softwarem
[TestWarez 2017] Okiem testera – tam gdzie hardware łączy się z softwaremStowarzyszenie Jakości Systemów Informatycznych (SJSI)
Mało kto zastanawia się, jak przebiega proces produkcji układów mikroelektronicznych z punktu widzenia zapewnienia jakości finalnego produktu. Coraz większe projekty wymuszają ciągły i bardzo dynamiczny rozwój dziedziny znanej jako DFT (design for testability), ale i narzędzi wspomagających cały proces testowy. W ramach prezentacji przedstawione zostaną podstawowe koncepty wykorzystywane przez największe firmy produkujące układy mikroelektroniczne, jak i problemy, z którymi należy się zmierzyć, by zapewnić wysoką jakość komercyjnego oprogramowania.
Specyfika oprogramowania tworzonego do testowania układów mikroelektoronicznych wykorzystywanych w urządzeniach powszechnego użytku różni się od klasycznych aplikacji desktopowych, jak i mobilnych. Bardzo duża dynamika rynku, zgodna z prawem Moore’a powoduje, że z roku na rok wymagania stawiane przed narzędziami wspomagającymi proces implementacji ciągle się zmienia. Wszystko to warunkuje sposób, w jaki należy podejść do testowania tego typu programów, jak rozwijać w pełni zautomatyzowaną infrastrukturę testową, pozwalającą zarządzać dziesiątkami tysięcy testów regresyjnych analizowanymi codziennie.Software testing basics and its types
This document discusses software testing techniques. It describes different types of testing like unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and regression testing. It also discusses test case selection strategies like boundary value analysis, risk-based testing, state-based testing and operational profile testing. Other topics covered include test automation, test oracles, white-box and black-box testing.
The Death of Flaky Tests by Dave Haeffner
Dave Haeffner is here to bury flaky tests, not to praise them.
For far too long we have allowed flaky tests to live in our world, creeping in and eroding the trust in our Selenium tests. They have wrought unreliable test results, noise, and ultimately an infinite amount of time wasted throughout our industry. Some blame Selenium for this. Others point a finger at the browser vendors. Some call out either instabilities in their Application Under Test or poor design practices in their test code.
Flaky Tests are often talked about in whispers, and ultimately accepted as a part of reality that we cannot control.
Dave says it’s time for a revolution! Join him in this SauceCon 2018 presentation as he shows you how to take the power back from Flaky Tests and end their reign once and for all.
Design For Testability
"To be tested a system has to be designed to be tested"
Eberhardt Rechtin, The Art Of System Architecting
Testing is one of the main activities through which we gather data to assess the quality of our software; this makes testability an important attribute of software--not only for development, but also for maintenance and bug fixing.
Design for testability is a term that has its origin in hardware design, where the concept was introduced in order to make it easier testing circuits while reducing the costs of doing so.
In this talk I'll show how to translate this concept to the software domain along with the consequences on various aspects of the development activities, both from the technical point of view (e.g., design, code quality, choice of frameworks, etc.), and the product management point of view (e.g., management of team dependencies, delivery time, costs, etc.). I'll provide examples based on real world experience, both for the technical and the management aspects.
SurfClipse-- An IDE based context-aware Meta Search Engine
Despite various debugging supports of the existing IDEs for programming errors and exceptions, software developers often look at web for working solutions or any up-to-date information. Traditional web search does not consider thecontext of the problems that they search solutions for, and thus it often does not help much in problem solving. In this paper, we propose a context-aware meta search tool, SurfClipse, that analyzes an encountered exception andits context in the IDE, and recommends not only suitable search queries but also relevant web pages for the exception (and its context). The tool collects results from three popular search engines and a programming Q & A site against the exception in the IDE, refines the results for relevance against the context of the exception, and then ranks them before recommendation. It provides two working modes--interactive and proactive to meet the versatile needs of the developers, and one can browse the result pages using a customized embedded browser provided by the tool.
AV-Comparatives Performance Test
This document summarizes the results of a performance test of 19 antivirus products conducted in October 2012. A variety of common computer tasks were performed on a test system with each antivirus product installed to measure the impact on system performance. The tested products achieved different award levels based on their results. Users are advised to consider how antivirus products may impact system performance when choosing security software.
TEA Presentation V 0.3
This document discusses test escape analysis (TEA), which analyzes defects that escaped testing to help improve testing efficiency. TEA examines past defects to identify patterns and trends, such as which test types or techniques could have caught which defects earlier. The benefits of early defect detection through improved testing are reduced costs, reputation, and engineer workload. TEA data from defect histories can show where to apply testing resources and procedure changes for maximum return.
What's hot (19)
The Difference between Track and Testing Performance
The Difference between Track and Testing Performance
2010-03-31 - VU Amsterdam - Experiences testing safety critical systems
2010-03-31 - VU Amsterdam - Experiences testing safety critical systems
Automatic Fine-Grained Issue Report Reclassification
Automatic Fine-Grained Issue Report Reclassification
[TestWarez 2017] Okiem testera – tam gdzie hardware łączy się z softwarem
[TestWarez 2017] Okiem testera – tam gdzie hardware łączy się z softwarem
SurfClipse-- An IDE based context-aware Meta Search Engine
SurfClipse-- An IDE based context-aware Meta Search Engine
Viewers also liked
Visual Regression Testing
This document provides an overview of visual regression testing using the Galen framework. It discusses topics like change blindness, why visual regression tests are important, how Galen works, the basics of Galen including commands, specification files and reports. It also covers challenges like dynamic content and addressing them, image comparison configuration, and generating reports.
System testing
The document discusses different strategies for system testing including top-down and bottom-up approaches. It emphasizes the importance of thorough testing that covers all logical paths and edge cases. Both black box and white box testing methods are outlined. Test planning should include test objectives, procedures, inputs, expected outputs, and analysis of results. Thorough testing of up to 50% of development time may be needed. Different categories of test data including normal, extreme, and exceptional cases should be used.
System Testing of Timing Requirements based on Use Cases and Timed Automata
The document describes a technique called TAUC that combines use case specifications and timed automata to automatically generate test cases for validating timing requirements of safety-critical systems. TAUC models the system functionality and environment as timed automata, identifies test inputs from use case scenarios to trigger state transitions, and employs a coverage-based and metaheuristic search approach to generate a test suite that stresses timing constraints. An evaluation on a case study shows TAUC achieves a 91% fault detection rate, significantly outperforming random and manual testing.
System testing
System testing evaluates a complete integrated system to determine if it meets specified requirements. It tests both functional and non-functional requirements. Functional requirements include business rules, transactions, authentication, and external interfaces. Non-functional requirements include performance, reliability, security, and usability. There are different types of system testing, including black box testing which tests functionality without knowledge of internal structure, white box testing which tests internal structures, and gray box testing which is a combination. Input, installation, graphical user interface, and regression testing are examples of different types of system testing.
Ielts -International English Language Testing System
The International English Language Testing System, which is popularly known as IELTS and more famous by its abbreviation, is an English Language proficiency test which is very important for those students who are from non-native English speaking countries and want to study or move to a native speaking country. IELTS is widely accepted by all or many Universities in UK, Australia, New Zealand and Canada. It is a mandatory test for study in Australia. This means you have to clear IELTS with required band score if you want are aiming at Australian universities. Other countries may require, either of IELTS or TOEFL.
12 functional-system-testing
The document outlines functional system testing techniques including test cases, test suites, functional analysis, equivalence partitioning, and boundary value analysis. It discusses the goal of testing being to uncover defects rather than track down bugs. Coverage and choosing representative test cases are important. Equivalence partitioning identifies valid and invalid input ranges, and boundary value analysis chooses boundary values and those just outside boundaries. Examples demonstrate applying these techniques to test a traffic violation system and country club admission system.
System testing
System testing involves testing the entire integrated software system to evaluate whether it meets its required specifications. This includes recovery testing to ensure the system can recover from failures, security testing to check protection mechanisms against unauthorized access, stress testing to evaluate performance under abnormal stressful situations, and performance testing to determine if the system meets non-functional requirements for runtime performance.
Regression testing
Regression testing is testing performed after changes to a system to detect whether new errors were introduced or old bugs have reappeared. It should be done after changes to requirements, new features added, defect fixes, or performance improvements. There are various strategies for regression testing including re-running all tests, test selection, test prioritization, and focusing on areas like frequently failing tests or recently changed code. While regression testing helps ensure system quality, managing large test suites over time poses challenges in minimizing tests while achieving coverage. Automating regression testing can help address these challenges.
System testing ppt
System testing involves testing a fully integrated software application to verify it meets requirements. It is done after unit and integration testing. System testing checks interactions between components, verifies functional and non-functional requirements, and validates the architecture. Test cases cover use cases and validate all types of requirements. The system is tested as a whole in a controlled environment to check for defects before delivery.
Software testing definition
Unit testing focuses on testing individual units or components of an application, such as functions, classes, or modules, to determine if they are fit for use. Integration testing checks how software components function when combined together and interact with each other. White box testing involves testing based on the internal structure and design of the code, such as checking all paths through the code have been executed. Black box testing ignores the internal implementation and tests the functionality of the system from an outside user perspective.
Scalable Software Testing and Verification of Non-Functional Properties throu...
This document discusses scalable software testing and verification of non-functional properties through heuristic search and optimization. It describes several projects with industry partners that use metaheuristic search techniques like hill climbing and genetic algorithms to generate test cases for non-functional properties of complex, configurable software systems. The techniques address issues of scalability and practicality for engineers by using dimensionality reduction, surrogate modeling, and dynamically adjusting the search strategy in different regions of the input space. The results provided worst-case scenarios more effectively than random testing alone.
Viewers also liked (12)
System Testing of Timing Requirements based on Use Cases and Timed Automata
System Testing of Timing Requirements based on Use Cases and Timed Automata
Ielts -International English Language Testing System
Ielts -International English Language Testing System
Sergii Puzankov «UI Regression Testing with "Gemini"»
Sergii Puzankov «UI Regression Testing with "Gemini"»
Scalable Software Testing and Verification of Non-Functional Properties throu...
Scalable Software Testing and Verification of Non-Functional Properties throu...
Similar to Exploiting the Testing System
Automatically generated win32 heuristic virus detection
The document describes research on automatically generating multiple neural network classifiers to detect unknown Win32 viruses through heuristics. Individual classifiers have too high a false positive rate, but combining outputs through voting reduces false positives to arbitrarily low levels with a slight increase in false negatives. The researchers constructed neural network classifiers based on n-gram features from virus samples, combining outputs through voting to achieve low false positive rates suitable for real-world use.
Colby_Sawyer_white_paper final 2
Scott Brown tested 13 popular antivirus programs using 10 zero-day viruses and 2 exploits. NOD32 and Kaspersky detected the most viruses initially, while after 1 week NOD32, F-Secure, and Kaspersky detected the most with updated definitions. Based on the tests, NOD32 used the fewest system resources and had the best support, leading Brown to conclude it was the best option. Brown will require NOD32 on all computers connecting to his college network.
The Value of Multi-scanning
Multi-scanning uses multiple antivirus engines to scan files rather than a single engine. The document discusses that no single antivirus can detect all threats and their detection rates vary. It summarizes that the key advantages of multi-scanning are improved malware detection rates through reduced detection gaps between engines, faster detection of outbreaks, and increased resilience against vulnerabilities in any single engine. However, it may also increase false positives and decrease performance due to additional processing required.
Setup Your Personal Malware Lab
This document discusses how to set up a malware analysis lab. It begins by introducing malware analysis and explaining why it is important. It then defines a malware lab as a safe, isolated environment for analyzing malware, noting both physical and virtual options. The document outlines the steps to build a malware lab, including isolating systems, installing behavioral and code analysis tools, and using online analysis tools. Finally, it lists specific tools that could be included in a malware lab, such as honeypots, behavioral monitors, disassemblers, sandboxes, and online scanners.
Application of data mining based malicious code detection techniques for dete...
This document discusses using data mining techniques to detect spyware. It applies Naive Bayes algorithms used in previous work to detect viruses to a dataset of 312 benign and 614 spyware executables. Feature extraction examines byte sequences in files. Initial tests showed low accuracy, but removing Trojan programs from the dataset improved results, with a window size of 4 and without Trojans achieving 80% detection with a 4% false positive rate. Future work proposes testing against larger window sizes and obfuscated code.
Avast! antivirus protection
Avast! is a freemium antivirus program available for Windows, Mac, and Linux that uses signatures, heuristics, file emulation, and a public malware database for detection. It provides protection at no cost with a simple interface but as a free program may not catch everything and false positives can occur. Performance impacts include around 12MB of memory usage and a 34 minute full system scan for a 122GB drive. Renewals are free of charge.
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
The document describes research on developing an automated malware classifier called Malgazer. Key aspects include:
- Optimizing the running window entropy (RWE) algorithm to reduce computation time. RWE is used as a feature for training machine learning models.
- Collecting and exploring a dataset of over 25,000 malware samples classified across 6 functional categories from VirusTotal.
- Training over 200 machine learning experiments using RWE and GIST features, and algorithms including decision trees, random forests, and neural networks. The best models achieved over 94% accuracy.
- Developing Malgazer as an RWE-based malware classifier and web application to classify new samples, achieving performance superior to prior literature
Malware Protection Week5Part4-IS Revision Fall2013 .docx
Malware Protection
Week5Part4-IS
Revision Fall2013
Malware Protection
Malware protection use to be known simply as virus protection. We have learned that
viruses are one form of malicious software and that a broader term to describe the
multitude of threats and the protection mechanism is needed. This is why the term
Malware is broader categorization of the threat and also the protection. Malware is a
portmanteau of the terms Malicious Software. Different malware protection packages
can cover a range of threats including viruses, worms, Trojans, spyware, adware, rootkits
to name a few.
As malware has evolved so has malware protection. Malware protection packages (MPP)
have evolved to provide more comprehensive protection mechanisms; including
firewalls, Intrusion Detection/Protection Systems (IDS/IPS), remote and central
management of system clusters, heterogeneous system protection and management,
signature and heuristic scanning, sandboxing to name just a few features.
It is important to understand that no one Malware Protection Package will find all pieces
of malware. Each package has its strengths and weaknesses. It is a good idea to always
have some form of malware protection running on your system in real time. However,
should you become infected it is useful to have an alternative strategy making use of
other scanners that you can run manually.
Free or Paid for Scanners
There is an adage that “you get what you pay for”. Generally this is true, but over time I
have found that there are some excellent free malware scanners that for single user
systems do a nice job. Some major requirements I have for a malware scanner are: it is
easy to run; does not require a lot of user interaction, uses little system resources, does a
good job finding and removing threats and automatically updates its signature database.
The following is not an endorsement for paid versus free scanners. It represents my
experiences for what they are worth.
I use to have a paid for Norton subscription. I found that over time the system footprint
for Norton grew which meant Norton required more CPU and overall system resources
for its real-time scanning processes. I think Norton has got better based on recent
experience I have with Windows 8 however at the time I had several performance
problems related to Norton. This got me to switch to free AVG. I used AVG for a while
and had real good luck, until AVG’s advertising got obnoxious. I decided to remove
AVG and found that process very difficult. I finally succeeded and then moved to using
free Avast. I have been using Avast for several years having very good luck.
I then started testing various malware scanners on virtual machines. This got me familiar
with Microsoft Security Essentials. This is a free product offered by Microsoft that nicely
integrates with Windows Vista and Windows 7 systems. I like the simplicity of its
inte ...
Automatically generated win32 heuristic
This document summarizes a study on automatically generating heuristic classifiers to detect unknown Win32 viruses. The researchers constructed multiple neural network classifiers using distinct n-gram features from virus samples. They found that combining the individual classifier outputs using voting reduced false positives to a very low level while only slightly increasing false negatives. This voting approach made it practical to retrain the classifiers regularly on updated sample sets.
Malware 101 by saurabh chaudhary
Malware Analysis
it includes details about static and dynamic analysis with knowledge about tools of trade and additional resources
Windows 8 kasp1248
The document summarizes the results of a test comparing the malware protection of Windows 8 and Kaspersky Internet Security. Kaspersky blocked all 42 real-world malware attacks in tests of URLs and emails, while Windows 8 failed to block 5 attacks. In static detection tests, Kaspersky detected 99% of over 111,000 malware files while Windows 8 only detected 90%. Both products detected all 2,500 prevalent malware files and had no false positives on 345,900 clean files. The results indicate Kaspersky provides better protection against modern malware threats than Windows 8 alone.
0box Analyzer--Afterdark Runtime Forensics for Automated Malware Analysis and...
This talk was given at DEF CON 2010 by Jeremy Chiu, Benson Wu, and Wayne Huang
https://www.defcon.org/html/defcon-18/dc-18-speakers.html#Huang
For antivirus vendors and malware researchers today, the challenge lies not in "obtaining" the malware samples - they have too many already. What's needed is automated tools to speed up the analysis process. Many sandboxes exist for behavior profiling, but it still remains a challenge to handle anti-analysis techniques and to generate useful reports.
The problem with current tools is the monitoring mechanism - there's always a "sandbox" or some type of monitoring mechanism that must be loaded BEFORE malware execution. This allows malware to detect whether such monitoring mechanisms exist, and to bail out thus avoiding detection and analysis.
Here we release 0box--an afterDark analyser that loads AFTER malware execution. No matter how well a piece of malware hides itself, there will be runtime forensics data that can be analyzed to identify "traces" of a process trying to hide itself. For example, evidences within the process module lists or discrepancies between kernel- and user-space datastructures. Since analysis is done post mortem, it is very hard for malware to detect the analysis.
By using runtime forensics to extract evidences, we turn a piece of malware from its original binary space into a feature space, with each feature representing the existence or non-existence of a certain behavior (ex, process table tampering, unpacking oneself, adding hooks, etc). By running clustering algorithms in this space, we show that this technique not only is very effective and very fast at detecting malware, but is also very accurate at clustering the malware into existing malware families. Such clustering is helpful for deciding whether a piece of malware is just a variation or repacking of an existing malware family, or is a brand new find.
Using three case studies, we will demo 0box, compare 0box with 0box with recent talks at BlackHat and other security conferences, and explain how 0box is different and why it is very effective. 0box will be released at the conference as a free tool.
Applications of genetic algorithms to malware detection and creation
This document summarizes and analyzes previous research on applying genetic algorithms to malware detection and creation. Section 2 summarizes a paper that compared the performance of genetic algorithm-based classifiers to non-genetic classifiers for detecting malware. It found genetic algorithms performed comparably to other methods in classification accuracy but with lower processing overhead. Sections 3 and 4 summarize papers applying genetic algorithms to optimize parameters for real-time malware detection and to evolve malware signatures similar to antibodies. Section 5 discusses using genetic algorithms to evolve malware. The document analyzes the effectiveness of genetic algorithms for malware detection tasks and issues around using them to evolve malware.
A trust system based on multi level virus detection
This document summarizes a research paper that proposes a new multi-level virus detection system (MDS). The MDS uses three levels of protection: 1) A smart memory monitor that detects virus behavior in real-time, 2) A file checker that analyzes batch files for virus-like code, and 3) An integrity checker that stores file signatures to detect modifications where viruses typically infect. The system was tested and able to detect virus activity through monitoring, file analysis, and integrity checking at different levels simultaneously. The paper concludes the MDS approach provides improved virus detection over single-method systems.
Automated malware invariant generation
The document proposes new methods for automatically generating malware invariants from binary code to detect and identify malware. Current signature-based malware detectors can be evaded through obfuscation, but malware invariants capture semantic properties that are more difficult to obfuscate. The method involves using formal methods and static analysis to extract invariants from binary code and represent them as semantic signatures, called malware invariants, that can be matched against suspicious code to detect malware families. Combining multiple static and dynamic analysis tools can help generate strong malware invariants that circumvent common obfuscation techniques used by malware writers.
How Antivirus detects VIRUS
Antivirus software detects viruses using several techniques:
1. Signature scanning compares files to known virus signatures in a database.
2. Heuristic scanning examines code for virus-like behavior even without a signature.
3. Integrity checking compares a file's hash to its original uninfected hash.
4. Behavior monitoring flags suspicious activities like reformatting disks.
5. Resident scanning actively scans files on access to prevent infection spread.
Automatic extraction of computer virus signatures
The document discusses the development of an automatic method for extracting computer virus signatures from machine code. Signatures are short byte sequences used by antivirus programs to identify viruses. Currently, human experts manually select signatures, but this process is time-consuming and cannot keep up with the accelerating rate of new viruses. The authors developed a statistical method to automatically extract signatures with low probabilities of false positives or negatives from virus machine code. This technique has been used to generate over 2,500 signatures for IBM's antivirus database and helps reduce the workload for human experts.
A feature selection and evaluation scheme for computer virus detection
This document proposes a feature selection and evaluation scheme for computer virus detection using machine learning. It presents an exhaustive search method to identify generic n-gram features from virus code, selecting features that meet minimum support thresholds within and across virus families. A hierarchical feature selection process is described to obtain concise yet representative features. The evaluation method aims to simulate detecting new virus outbreaks by testing the classifier on previously unseen viruses from the same families not in the training set.
Cyber Defense Forensic Analyst - Real World Hands-on Examples
The document discusses analyzing malware using static and dynamic analysis techniques. Static analysis involves examining a malware file's code and structure without executing it, using tools like disassemblers and string extractors. Dynamic analysis executes malware in a controlled environment to observe its behaviors and any changes it makes. The document then demonstrates analyzing the "Netflix Account Generator" malware using an isolated cloud sandbox, where it is observed starting child processes and making outbound network connections, suggesting it is a remote access trojan.
A study of anti virus' response to unknown threats
A study evaluated 12 popular anti-virus programs' ability to detect unknown threats through behavior analysis. Tests were conducted for keylogging, code injection, and network access. Most programs did not detect the threats. Sophos and Trend Micro blocked some tests but still allowed malicious behavior. The study recommends anti-virus vendors improve detection of unknown malware through behavior analysis.
Similar to Exploiting the Testing System (20)
Automatically generated win32 heuristic virus detection
Automatically generated win32 heuristic virus detection
Application of data mining based malicious code detection techniques for dete...
Application of data mining based malicious code detection techniques for dete...
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
Keith J. Jones, Ph.D. - MALGAZER: AN AUTOMATED MALWARE CLASSIFIER WITH RUNNIN...
Malware Protection Week5Part4-IS Revision Fall2013 .docx
Malware Protection Week5Part4-IS Revision Fall2013 .docx
0box Analyzer--Afterdark Runtime Forensics for Automated Malware Analysis and...
0box Analyzer--Afterdark Runtime Forensics for Automated Malware Analysis and...
Applications of genetic algorithms to malware detection and creation
Applications of genetic algorithms to malware detection and creation
A trust system based on multi level virus detection
A trust system based on multi level virus detection
A feature selection and evaluation scheme for computer virus detection
A feature selection and evaluation scheme for computer virus detection
Cyber Defense Forensic Analyst - Real World Hands-on Examples
Cyber Defense Forensic Analyst - Real World Hands-on Examples
A study of anti virus' response to unknown threats
A study of anti virus' response to unknown threats
Recently uploaded
leewayhertz.com-AI in predictive maintenance Use cases technologies benefits ...
Predictive maintenance is a proactive approach that anticipates equipment failures before they happen. At the forefront of this innovative strategy is Artificial Intelligence (AI), which brings unprecedented precision and efficiency. AI in predictive maintenance is transforming industries by reducing downtime, minimizing costs, and enhancing productivity.
June Patch Tuesday
Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.
AWS Cloud Cost Optimization Presentation.pptx
This presentation provides valuable insights into effective cost-saving techniques on AWS. Learn how to optimize your AWS resources by rightsizing, increasing elasticity, picking the right storage class, and choosing the best pricing model. Additionally, discover essential governance mechanisms to ensure continuous cost efficiency. Whether you are new to AWS or an experienced user, this presentation provides clear and practical tips to help you reduce your cloud costs and get the most out of your budget.
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
Azure API Management to expose backend services securely
How to use Azure API Management to expose backend service securely
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift.pdf
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift
Overview
Dive into the world of anomaly detection on edge devices with our comprehensive hands-on tutorial. This SlideShare presentation will guide you through the entire process, from data collection and model training to edge deployment and real-time monitoring. Perfect for those looking to implement robust anomaly detection systems on resource-constrained IoT/edge devices.
Key Topics Covered
1. Introduction to Anomaly Detection
- Understand the fundamentals of anomaly detection and its importance in identifying unusual behavior or failures in systems.
2. Understanding Edge (IoT)
- Learn about edge computing and IoT, and how they enable real-time data processing and decision-making at the source.
3. What is ArgoCD?
- Discover ArgoCD, a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes, and its role in deploying applications on edge devices.
4. Deployment Using ArgoCD for Edge Devices
- Step-by-step guide on deploying anomaly detection models on edge devices using ArgoCD.
5. Introduction to Apache Kafka and S3
- Explore Apache Kafka for real-time data streaming and Amazon S3 for scalable storage solutions.
6. Viewing Kafka Messages in the Data Lake
- Learn how to view and analyze Kafka messages stored in a data lake for better insights.
7. What is Prometheus?
- Get to know Prometheus, an open-source monitoring and alerting toolkit, and its application in monitoring edge devices.
8. Monitoring Application Metrics with Prometheus
- Detailed instructions on setting up Prometheus to monitor the performance and health of your anomaly detection system.
9. What is Camel K?
- Introduction to Camel K, a lightweight integration framework built on Apache Camel, designed for Kubernetes.
10. Configuring Camel K Integrations for Data Pipelines
- Learn how to configure Camel K for seamless data pipeline integrations in your anomaly detection workflow.
11. What is a Jupyter Notebook?
- Overview of Jupyter Notebooks, an open-source web application for creating and sharing documents with live code, equations, visualizations, and narrative text.
12. Jupyter Notebooks with Code Examples
- Hands-on examples and code snippets in Jupyter Notebooks to help you implement and test anomaly detection models.
Letter and Document Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Sol...
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on automated letter generation for Bonterra Impact Management using Google Workspace or Microsoft 365.
Interested in deploying letter generation automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024
I develop the Ruby programming language, RubyGems, and Bundler, which are package managers for Ruby. Today, I will introduce how to enhance the security of your application using open-source software (OSS) examples from Ruby and RubyGems.
The first topic is CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures). I have published CVEs many times. But what exactly is a CVE? I'll provide a basic understanding of CVEs and explain how to detect and handle vulnerabilities in OSS.
Next, let's discuss package managers. Package managers play a critical role in the OSS ecosystem. I'll explain how to manage library dependencies in your application.
I'll share insights into how the Ruby and RubyGems core team works to keep our ecosystem safe. By the end of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to safeguard your code.
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Discover the seamless integration of RPA (Robotic Process Automation), COMPOSER, and APM with AWS IDP enhanced with Slack notifications. Explore how these technologies converge to streamline workflows, optimize performance, and ensure secure access, all while leveraging the power of AWS IDP and real-time communication via Slack notifications.
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
A Mix Chart displays historical data of numbers in a graphical or tabular form. The Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart specifically shows the results of a sequence of numbers over different periods.
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays - June 2024
Columbus Data & Analytics Wednesdays, June 2024 with Maria Copot 20
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
https://www.wask.co/ebooks/digital-marketing-trends-in-2024
Feeling lost in the digital marketing whirlwind of 2024? Technology is changing, consumer habits are evolving, and staying ahead of the curve feels like a never-ending pursuit. This e-book is your compass. Dive into actionable insights to handle the complexities of modern marketing. From hyper-personalization to the power of user-generated content, learn how to build long-term relationships with your audience and unlock the secrets to success in the ever-shifting digital landscape.
Nunit vs XUnit vs MSTest Differences Between These Unit Testing Frameworks.pdf
When it comes to unit testing in the .NET ecosystem, developers have a wide range of options available. Among the most popular choices are NUnit, XUnit, and MSTest. These unit testing frameworks provide essential tools and features to help ensure the quality and reliability of code. However, understanding the differences between these frameworks is crucial for selecting the most suitable one for your projects.
Recently uploaded (20)
leewayhertz.com-AI in predictive maintenance Use cases technologies benefits ...
leewayhertz.com-AI in predictive maintenance Use cases technologies benefits ...
Overcoming the PLG Trap: Lessons from Canva's Head of Sales & Head of EMEA Da...
Overcoming the PLG Trap: Lessons from Canva's Head of Sales & Head of EMEA Da...
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Azure API Management to expose backend services securely
Azure API Management to expose backend services securely
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift.pdf
Monitoring and Managing Anomaly Detection on OpenShift.pdf
WeTestAthens: Postman's AI & Automation Techniques
WeTestAthens: Postman's AI & Automation Techniques
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Letter and Document Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Sol...
Letter and Document Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Sol...
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
Let's Integrate MuleSoft RPA, COMPOSER, APM with AWS IDP along with Slack
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
How to Interpret Trends in the Kalyan Rajdhani Mix Chart.pdf
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
Digital Marketing Trends in 2024 | Guide for Staying Ahead
Nunit vs XUnit vs MSTest Differences Between These Unit Testing Frameworks.pdf
Nunit vs XUnit vs MSTest Differences Between These Unit Testing Frameworks.pdf
Exploiting the Testing System
- 1. Exploiting the testing system Viorel Canja,Head of BitDefender Labs