Community empowerment through medical help dhirendra pateldhirendra1972
Introducton:
Community empowerment refers to the process of enabling communities to increase control over their lives. "Communities" are groups of people that may or may not be spatially connected, but who share common interests, concerns or identities. These communities could be local, national or international, with specific or broad interests. 'Empowerment' refers to the process by which people gain control over the factors and decisions that shape their lives. Empowerment be consider in many different aspect. Here we are talking about Health and Healthy Community. Any community needs to be healthy to have empowerment.
Meaning:
According to the World Health Organization, Community Empowerment "addresses the social, cultural, political, and economic determinants that underpin health and seeks to build partnerships with others to find solutions."
Medical Help to Empower the Community
We all know there are different ways to empower community. Here we are talking about a Innovative way to empower community. A healthy community is the only community who can sustain their empowerment as well as their developmental process.
Past President Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson enacted ACTS and legislation to help the United States Poor to ensure they has proper health care insurance. “The Social Security Act was passed by Congress as part of President Roosevelt’s Second New Deal agenda. In signing the Act into law on August 14, 1935, Roosevelt became the first president to advocate for and create legislation for the provision of governmental assistance for the elderly at the federal level” (CSU, 2015). Considering the new policies and new developments of the country to ensure that housing, food, and work was also available. Time was surely of the essence considering it was the turn of the century and the United States was implementing new changes and programs within the United States.
In Spring 2013, we are on the precipice of dramatic, disruptive change in the health field that offers an unprecedented opportunity and challenge to transform health care and population health.
We know that traditional public health approaches along with more and better health care are not enough to improve health outcomes, equity, and cost. We must also:
- implement sustainable, fundamental "upstream" changes that address the root causes of disease and disability; and
- transform the way we deliver health care to ensure access to quality, affordable health care for all.
Enjoy this keynote panel presentation from Larry Cohen of the Prevention Institute, which was presented at the 2013 Annual Leadership Conference, co-sponsored by the Center for Health Leadership (CHL) and the California Pacific Public Health Training Center (CALPACT) at UC Berkeley's School of Public Health.
To learn more about this event, please visit:
http://calpact.org/index.php/en/events/leadership-conference
Learn more about CALPACT:
http://calpact.org/
Learn more about the CHL:
http://chl.berkeley.edu/
SOCW 6351 Wk 9 Discussion 1. Need Responses.Respond in one of t.docxrosemariebrayshaw
SOCW 6351 Wk 9 Discussion 1. Need Responses.
Respond in one of the following ways:
· Describe two factors that might make minority groups especially vulnerable in the Medicaid policy your colleague cited. Explain why these groups may not have a voice in the policy-making process.
· Offer examples of organized self-help and citizens’ groups as both support mechanisms and potentially powerful lobbies. Describe how these lobbying bodies can help in amending the policy your colleague described.
Support your response with specific references to the resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.
NA:
Top of Form
Medicaid is a medical assistance program developed specifically for low income individuals of any age, unlike Medicare, which is designed for those over 65 and have no income requirements (“Difference between Medicare and Medicaid”, n.d.). When health care policies are change, they affect programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. For example, when the ACA (Affordable Care Act) was implemented, it led to an increase of enrollment as it made the process easier and reached more individuals and it expanded Medicaid eligibility to low-income adults (Wachino, Artiga & Rudowitz, 2014).
In the state of Pennsylvania, a Medicaid policy that I would amend would be the Healthy PA policy, which was a Medicaid expansion that included drug and alcohol services (IRETA, 2015). The issue is the length of time it takes for someone to be admitted into a program. Whether it’s getting into an inpatient or outpatient program, the process needs to be expedited and more streamlined. Many who are suffering from substance abuse disorders struggle with finally getting themselves into a program and delaying the process could result in someone hesitating and deciding not to move forward with treatment that is crucial (IRETA, 2015).
In Pennsylvania, stakeholders include a steering committee, which is made up of hospitals, health care providers, consumers, foundations and academic institutions (“HIP”, 2019). This committee comes up with ways to improve population health and control health cost including Medicaid and Medicare. They developed a plan for heathcare delivery that will improve the quality of life for everyone, without limitations on income or background (“HIP”, 2019). This committee has 5 work groups that develop implementation plans for the goals that were developed by the committee and focus on specific aspects such as payment, price and quality transparency, population health, healthcare transformation and health information technology (“HIP”, 2019).
References:
HIP stakeholders. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.health.pa.gov/topics/Health-Innovation/Pages/Stakeholders.aspx
IRETA. (2015). Pennsylvania’s Medicaid expansion smooths the road to addiction treatment, but barriers remain. Retrieved from https://ireta.org/resources/pennsylvanias-medicaid-expansion-smooths-the-road-to-addiction-treatment-but-barriers-remain/
Wachino, V., A.
The 2014 Health Insurance Exchanges Summit features a timely agenda focused on leveraging current “knowns” and progress to derive practical strategies for successful future participation in HIXs. Health plan executives, state and federal exchange officials, providers, and other policy experts convene to discuss business and operational considerations in a changing marketplace.
http://www.worldcongress.com/events/HL14022/
Module 1 DiscussionHealth Policies Lillian Wald and .docxaudeleypearl
Module 1 Discussion
Health Policies
Lillian Wald and Mary Brewster took cogent leaps in the progression of nursing influence, with the development of The Henry Street Settlement in 1893 (Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, O’Grady 2016). This action paved the way for the evolution of better health care policy, centered around community needs. Now, health policy is influenced by research, media, politics, lobbyists, and much more; based on community values.
The Structure of health care policy is yet complicated, with the basis of core determinants of health that influences policy. Said determinants are comprised of factors such as gender, education and literacy, physical environment, culture, and not to say the least, social status. (Policies and Politics, page 3). Social status stands out, as it is a headline issue with health care coverage. Oppressed communities are at stake, as they have exhausted even the thought of better health access due to low literacy, no access to good jobs, and poor nutritional standards.
The process of health care policy has substantial dependency on nurse leadership. Meaning, nurses who understand how policy drives coverage and care should advocate for the community. Not many nurses want to approach the frontlines to tackle the many challenges in this specific side of the industry. However, one must understand the sources of health care policies and their effect on society to generate change. According to an article written by Susan Taft and Kevin Nanna of Kent State University, public sources are the core influence of governmental bodies constructing policies. Meaning a vast existence of public education should be available to communities that do not quite understand the process. Together, Taft and Nanna broke down the
Ways to Influencing Public Policy.
This included significant points such as media impact by writing letters and getting headlines. The same tactic is seen by many politicians during the elections; designed to stir the emotions of voters. Another is to join an organization that believes in and is driven by advocacy. Consistent research is necessary to be in-tuned with public issues, which can help in every aspect of said suggestion to create power in numbers.
With the focus on public health, the Affordable Care Act and its purpose contributed greatly to the influencing of certain health policies; so that more people could afford care. Such policies included safe health practices by health institutions, which lead to care improvement by placing penalties on readmission less than thirty days. But, at the same time, provided funding for improved outcomes driven by the implementation of new policies. However, coverage impacted by zip code is certainly a topic where more nurse leaders are needed to address. We are talking about a level of nursing leadership that could shift the issues affecting upstream factors. Kohnke's philosophy of functional advocacy speaks volumes, in.
This course is based on previous courses taken in the MSHA program.docxjuliennehar
This course is based on previous courses taken in the MSHA program.
In general, there will be no additional new readings, but rather the course will be based on the reading materials required in program core courses.
The program core courses are listed below. Please refer to the lists of readings as they appear on their respective course syllabus pages.
Again, these readings should refresh your memory on the course topics, and serve you in responding to the Case, SLP, and Discussion assignments.
In the modular Background materials pages, the instructor has identified the course readings most relevant to the Capstone modular topic(s).
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Module 4
MHA506 - Health Care System Organization
X
X
X
MHA507 - Health Care Delivery Systems
X
X
X
MHM525 - Marketing in Healthcare
X
MHM502 - Health Care Finance
X
MHM514 - Health Information Systems
X
MHM522 - Legal Aspects of Health Administration
X
Running Head: MARKETING PLAN1
MARKETING PLAN 4
Marketing Plan
Shaneya Acker
Dr. Eric Oestmann
MHM 525
Trident University International
April 27, 2019
Contents
Cover Letter3
Introduction4
Geographical location4
Historical background4
Marketing Goals and Objectives5
Market Analysis6
Environmental Analysis7
Political and Legal7
Social and Cultural7
Consumer Analysis8
SWOT8
Strengths8
Weaknesses9
Opportunities10
Threats10
Marketing and Promotion strategies10
Marketing and Promotion Strategies13
References16
Cover Letter
This paper presents a marketing plan for Continuum health partners. Continuum health partners is an organization based in the metropolitan area of New York US. The main aim of the organization is to coordinate the operations of its members to keep the organization financially solvent by controlling costs in the highly competitive industry (Pronk et al., 2015). The plan outlines various goals and objectives which will help the organization succeed. Goals are used as a road map for the organization to achieve its vision. The plan also presents a market analysis for the healthcare industry.
The plan also presents an environmental analysis of political and social issues affecting the organization. Politics and policy issues affect the healthcare industry in a big way. For instance, the Affordable Healthcare Act has been used in the US for a while. However, the new incumbent government has promised that they will replace this Act. Social and cultural factors significantly affect the quality of healthcare for a community. Most people in the US are educated and this helps them to understand the importance of staying healthy. The paper also presents a consumer analysis of the healthcare sector.
Various strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing the organization are also discussed in details. One of the main strengths of the organization is its geographical location which ensures that consumers can easily access health care services within the city. Finally, the paper explores ...
Navigate 2 Scenario - Going from Policy to Law (Episode 2) O.docxmayank272369
Navigate 2 Scenario - Going from Policy to Law (Episode 2)
Overview of Scenario
You are an intern working with the Senator’s team to get the bill (based on the policy created in Episode 1 for the Navigate 2 Scenario) passed. You must follow the legislative process to select committees, identify stakeholders, communicate with
health care providers
about their role, and identify key departments who will be responsible if the bill is passed. Within this virtual scenario, you will need to apply concepts such as how others influence the process, for example, health care providers who write letters, telephone and make personal visits to senator’s office. You should understand that this is the responsibility of a health care professional. Also, you must be able to articulate why the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is the agency chosen to implement the law and develop the regulations, what the regulations are, and why they are important.
Assessment
You will
create
a recommendation where you will recommend a committee, identify general stakeholders, and identify responsible departments. Your recommendation will be posted in this discussion board forum. You must also respond to 2 of your peers' posts and make sure to reference any outside sources you may have used in your recommendation.
Learning Outcomes Addressed in this virtual scenario.
Examine the various applications of the law within the health care system.
Analyze how such various applications of the law affect decisions in the development and operation of a health care organization.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in health care policy, law, and ethics.
Characters from this Navigate 2 Scenario scenario:
The Student (You),
Health Care Policy
Intern for Congress
The student used to work within the Bright Road Health Care System, and had a special interest in policy. The student is thinking about moving into politics, hoping to make a difference at that level. The student has just been accepted into the internship; this is the student’s first big project.
Peter Shackley, Senior Policy Staff Member
The student’s mentor, Peter, is a young and feisty staff member. In his late 20s, Pete has been interested in politics since he was President of his high school student body. He’s especially passionate about policy-making and how the process works. Pete will help guide the student through the policy-making process.
Quinn Smith, Chairman of the Board of Bright Road Health Care System
Quinn is in his 50s. In his capacity, Quinn takes on the responsibility for corporate governance, capital formation, setting the company’s operating strategy, and guiding it to profitability. The student will work with Quinn to determine how the bill and policy may impact the operations of the Health Care System. (good as he is a stakeholder at state level)
Timothy Kohl, Staff member at DHHS
Timothy is in his mid-50s, and has been with DHHS for more than.
Utah Health Policy Project (UHPP) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization advancing sustainable health care solutions for underserved Utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
CBIZ's very own Todd Hanson is featured in the November edition of the Minneapolis St. Paul Business Journal. Read the panelists' expert opinions about current issues surrounding health care including benefits, mobile health, health education, aca compliance, and more!
Panelists include Todd Hanson, director of client services at CBIZ Benefits & Insurance Services; Jesse Berg, an attorney specializing in health care law at Gray Plant Mooty; John Soshnik, a partner in the health law group at Lindquist & Vennum; Becca Miller, director of employer solutions at Capella Education Co.; and Steven Rush, director of health literacy innovations at UnitedHealth Group Inc. Allison O’Toole, interim CEO at MNsure, served as moderator.
Chapter 4 Where Do We Want to BePrevious sectionNext sectionWilheminaRossi174
Chapter 4 Where Do We Want to Be?
Previous section
Next section
Chapter 4
Where Do We Want to Be?
Even in a country that lacks an overall, cohesive health policy, it is useful to ask: How unhappy are we with our health care, and what do we want to change? Do not expect consistent responses from the American public. When the nation was debating the Clinton health plan, a number of organizations surveyed the public. Respondents reported they believed that the health care system was in trouble. At the same time, they expressed satisfaction with their own largely employer-financed health care programs. Public support for universal coverage was strong, but individuals did not want to pay higher taxes to support it (Peterson, 1995). An ABC New/Washington Post poll in October 1993 showed the following (Schick, 1995):
• 51% of the public favored the Clinton health plan.
• 59% thought that it was better than the existing system.
• Only 19% thought that their care would get better under it, and 34% thought worse care would result.
• However, 57% were against tax increases to pay for it, whereas 40% would be willing to pay.
The American public also appears to be split over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) as a whole. Data about opposition to the act can be misleading, with a significant portion of opposition coming from people who believe the ACA did not go far enough. They would prefer a public option, for example, or a single-payer system. Overall, the public is
negative about the individual mandate and the employer mandate, but is much in favor of the insurance changes that have been implemented. People are confused about the insurance exchange provisions of the act as well. An April 2013 tracking poll found that “about half the public says they do not have enough information about the health reform law to understand how it will impact their own family, a share that rises among the uninsured and low-income households” (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2013). The same poll reported that 42% of respondents did not know that the ACA was still the law of the land. Twelve percent believed it had been repealed by Congress, 7% believed it had been overturned by the Supreme Court, and 23% didn’t know whether it was still in effect or not.
Americans report being in good health more than any other OECD country. Their complaints are mostly about financial risks and to some extent access and waiting. A 2010 study of six developed countries showed that Americans were satisfied with their doctors and the availability of effective care, but were also more likely to report that the system needed to be completely rebuilt (Papanicolas, Cylus, & Smith, 2013).
4.1 Alignment with the Rest of Society
Previous section
Next section
4.1 ALIGNMENT WITH THE REST OF SOCIETY
The democratic process is likely to generate many policy experiments as we cope with advancing technology, changing demographics, political pressures, and economic fluctuations. These exper ...
Community empowerment through medical help dhirendra pateldhirendra1972
Introducton:
Community empowerment refers to the process of enabling communities to increase control over their lives. "Communities" are groups of people that may or may not be spatially connected, but who share common interests, concerns or identities. These communities could be local, national or international, with specific or broad interests. 'Empowerment' refers to the process by which people gain control over the factors and decisions that shape their lives. Empowerment be consider in many different aspect. Here we are talking about Health and Healthy Community. Any community needs to be healthy to have empowerment.
Meaning:
According to the World Health Organization, Community Empowerment "addresses the social, cultural, political, and economic determinants that underpin health and seeks to build partnerships with others to find solutions."
Medical Help to Empower the Community
We all know there are different ways to empower community. Here we are talking about a Innovative way to empower community. A healthy community is the only community who can sustain their empowerment as well as their developmental process.
Past President Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson enacted ACTS and legislation to help the United States Poor to ensure they has proper health care insurance. “The Social Security Act was passed by Congress as part of President Roosevelt’s Second New Deal agenda. In signing the Act into law on August 14, 1935, Roosevelt became the first president to advocate for and create legislation for the provision of governmental assistance for the elderly at the federal level” (CSU, 2015). Considering the new policies and new developments of the country to ensure that housing, food, and work was also available. Time was surely of the essence considering it was the turn of the century and the United States was implementing new changes and programs within the United States.
In Spring 2013, we are on the precipice of dramatic, disruptive change in the health field that offers an unprecedented opportunity and challenge to transform health care and population health.
We know that traditional public health approaches along with more and better health care are not enough to improve health outcomes, equity, and cost. We must also:
- implement sustainable, fundamental "upstream" changes that address the root causes of disease and disability; and
- transform the way we deliver health care to ensure access to quality, affordable health care for all.
Enjoy this keynote panel presentation from Larry Cohen of the Prevention Institute, which was presented at the 2013 Annual Leadership Conference, co-sponsored by the Center for Health Leadership (CHL) and the California Pacific Public Health Training Center (CALPACT) at UC Berkeley's School of Public Health.
To learn more about this event, please visit:
http://calpact.org/index.php/en/events/leadership-conference
Learn more about CALPACT:
http://calpact.org/
Learn more about the CHL:
http://chl.berkeley.edu/
SOCW 6351 Wk 9 Discussion 1. Need Responses.Respond in one of t.docxrosemariebrayshaw
SOCW 6351 Wk 9 Discussion 1. Need Responses.
Respond in one of the following ways:
· Describe two factors that might make minority groups especially vulnerable in the Medicaid policy your colleague cited. Explain why these groups may not have a voice in the policy-making process.
· Offer examples of organized self-help and citizens’ groups as both support mechanisms and potentially powerful lobbies. Describe how these lobbying bodies can help in amending the policy your colleague described.
Support your response with specific references to the resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.
NA:
Top of Form
Medicaid is a medical assistance program developed specifically for low income individuals of any age, unlike Medicare, which is designed for those over 65 and have no income requirements (“Difference between Medicare and Medicaid”, n.d.). When health care policies are change, they affect programs such as Medicaid and Medicare. For example, when the ACA (Affordable Care Act) was implemented, it led to an increase of enrollment as it made the process easier and reached more individuals and it expanded Medicaid eligibility to low-income adults (Wachino, Artiga & Rudowitz, 2014).
In the state of Pennsylvania, a Medicaid policy that I would amend would be the Healthy PA policy, which was a Medicaid expansion that included drug and alcohol services (IRETA, 2015). The issue is the length of time it takes for someone to be admitted into a program. Whether it’s getting into an inpatient or outpatient program, the process needs to be expedited and more streamlined. Many who are suffering from substance abuse disorders struggle with finally getting themselves into a program and delaying the process could result in someone hesitating and deciding not to move forward with treatment that is crucial (IRETA, 2015).
In Pennsylvania, stakeholders include a steering committee, which is made up of hospitals, health care providers, consumers, foundations and academic institutions (“HIP”, 2019). This committee comes up with ways to improve population health and control health cost including Medicaid and Medicare. They developed a plan for heathcare delivery that will improve the quality of life for everyone, without limitations on income or background (“HIP”, 2019). This committee has 5 work groups that develop implementation plans for the goals that were developed by the committee and focus on specific aspects such as payment, price and quality transparency, population health, healthcare transformation and health information technology (“HIP”, 2019).
References:
HIP stakeholders. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.health.pa.gov/topics/Health-Innovation/Pages/Stakeholders.aspx
IRETA. (2015). Pennsylvania’s Medicaid expansion smooths the road to addiction treatment, but barriers remain. Retrieved from https://ireta.org/resources/pennsylvanias-medicaid-expansion-smooths-the-road-to-addiction-treatment-but-barriers-remain/
Wachino, V., A.
The 2014 Health Insurance Exchanges Summit features a timely agenda focused on leveraging current “knowns” and progress to derive practical strategies for successful future participation in HIXs. Health plan executives, state and federal exchange officials, providers, and other policy experts convene to discuss business and operational considerations in a changing marketplace.
http://www.worldcongress.com/events/HL14022/
Module 1 DiscussionHealth Policies Lillian Wald and .docxaudeleypearl
Module 1 Discussion
Health Policies
Lillian Wald and Mary Brewster took cogent leaps in the progression of nursing influence, with the development of The Henry Street Settlement in 1893 (Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, O’Grady 2016). This action paved the way for the evolution of better health care policy, centered around community needs. Now, health policy is influenced by research, media, politics, lobbyists, and much more; based on community values.
The Structure of health care policy is yet complicated, with the basis of core determinants of health that influences policy. Said determinants are comprised of factors such as gender, education and literacy, physical environment, culture, and not to say the least, social status. (Policies and Politics, page 3). Social status stands out, as it is a headline issue with health care coverage. Oppressed communities are at stake, as they have exhausted even the thought of better health access due to low literacy, no access to good jobs, and poor nutritional standards.
The process of health care policy has substantial dependency on nurse leadership. Meaning, nurses who understand how policy drives coverage and care should advocate for the community. Not many nurses want to approach the frontlines to tackle the many challenges in this specific side of the industry. However, one must understand the sources of health care policies and their effect on society to generate change. According to an article written by Susan Taft and Kevin Nanna of Kent State University, public sources are the core influence of governmental bodies constructing policies. Meaning a vast existence of public education should be available to communities that do not quite understand the process. Together, Taft and Nanna broke down the
Ways to Influencing Public Policy.
This included significant points such as media impact by writing letters and getting headlines. The same tactic is seen by many politicians during the elections; designed to stir the emotions of voters. Another is to join an organization that believes in and is driven by advocacy. Consistent research is necessary to be in-tuned with public issues, which can help in every aspect of said suggestion to create power in numbers.
With the focus on public health, the Affordable Care Act and its purpose contributed greatly to the influencing of certain health policies; so that more people could afford care. Such policies included safe health practices by health institutions, which lead to care improvement by placing penalties on readmission less than thirty days. But, at the same time, provided funding for improved outcomes driven by the implementation of new policies. However, coverage impacted by zip code is certainly a topic where more nurse leaders are needed to address. We are talking about a level of nursing leadership that could shift the issues affecting upstream factors. Kohnke's philosophy of functional advocacy speaks volumes, in.
This course is based on previous courses taken in the MSHA program.docxjuliennehar
This course is based on previous courses taken in the MSHA program.
In general, there will be no additional new readings, but rather the course will be based on the reading materials required in program core courses.
The program core courses are listed below. Please refer to the lists of readings as they appear on their respective course syllabus pages.
Again, these readings should refresh your memory on the course topics, and serve you in responding to the Case, SLP, and Discussion assignments.
In the modular Background materials pages, the instructor has identified the course readings most relevant to the Capstone modular topic(s).
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Module 4
MHA506 - Health Care System Organization
X
X
X
MHA507 - Health Care Delivery Systems
X
X
X
MHM525 - Marketing in Healthcare
X
MHM502 - Health Care Finance
X
MHM514 - Health Information Systems
X
MHM522 - Legal Aspects of Health Administration
X
Running Head: MARKETING PLAN1
MARKETING PLAN 4
Marketing Plan
Shaneya Acker
Dr. Eric Oestmann
MHM 525
Trident University International
April 27, 2019
Contents
Cover Letter3
Introduction4
Geographical location4
Historical background4
Marketing Goals and Objectives5
Market Analysis6
Environmental Analysis7
Political and Legal7
Social and Cultural7
Consumer Analysis8
SWOT8
Strengths8
Weaknesses9
Opportunities10
Threats10
Marketing and Promotion strategies10
Marketing and Promotion Strategies13
References16
Cover Letter
This paper presents a marketing plan for Continuum health partners. Continuum health partners is an organization based in the metropolitan area of New York US. The main aim of the organization is to coordinate the operations of its members to keep the organization financially solvent by controlling costs in the highly competitive industry (Pronk et al., 2015). The plan outlines various goals and objectives which will help the organization succeed. Goals are used as a road map for the organization to achieve its vision. The plan also presents a market analysis for the healthcare industry.
The plan also presents an environmental analysis of political and social issues affecting the organization. Politics and policy issues affect the healthcare industry in a big way. For instance, the Affordable Healthcare Act has been used in the US for a while. However, the new incumbent government has promised that they will replace this Act. Social and cultural factors significantly affect the quality of healthcare for a community. Most people in the US are educated and this helps them to understand the importance of staying healthy. The paper also presents a consumer analysis of the healthcare sector.
Various strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats facing the organization are also discussed in details. One of the main strengths of the organization is its geographical location which ensures that consumers can easily access health care services within the city. Finally, the paper explores ...
Navigate 2 Scenario - Going from Policy to Law (Episode 2) O.docxmayank272369
Navigate 2 Scenario - Going from Policy to Law (Episode 2)
Overview of Scenario
You are an intern working with the Senator’s team to get the bill (based on the policy created in Episode 1 for the Navigate 2 Scenario) passed. You must follow the legislative process to select committees, identify stakeholders, communicate with
health care providers
about their role, and identify key departments who will be responsible if the bill is passed. Within this virtual scenario, you will need to apply concepts such as how others influence the process, for example, health care providers who write letters, telephone and make personal visits to senator’s office. You should understand that this is the responsibility of a health care professional. Also, you must be able to articulate why the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is the agency chosen to implement the law and develop the regulations, what the regulations are, and why they are important.
Assessment
You will
create
a recommendation where you will recommend a committee, identify general stakeholders, and identify responsible departments. Your recommendation will be posted in this discussion board forum. You must also respond to 2 of your peers' posts and make sure to reference any outside sources you may have used in your recommendation.
Learning Outcomes Addressed in this virtual scenario.
Examine the various applications of the law within the health care system.
Analyze how such various applications of the law affect decisions in the development and operation of a health care organization.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in health care policy, law, and ethics.
Characters from this Navigate 2 Scenario scenario:
The Student (You),
Health Care Policy
Intern for Congress
The student used to work within the Bright Road Health Care System, and had a special interest in policy. The student is thinking about moving into politics, hoping to make a difference at that level. The student has just been accepted into the internship; this is the student’s first big project.
Peter Shackley, Senior Policy Staff Member
The student’s mentor, Peter, is a young and feisty staff member. In his late 20s, Pete has been interested in politics since he was President of his high school student body. He’s especially passionate about policy-making and how the process works. Pete will help guide the student through the policy-making process.
Quinn Smith, Chairman of the Board of Bright Road Health Care System
Quinn is in his 50s. In his capacity, Quinn takes on the responsibility for corporate governance, capital formation, setting the company’s operating strategy, and guiding it to profitability. The student will work with Quinn to determine how the bill and policy may impact the operations of the Health Care System. (good as he is a stakeholder at state level)
Timothy Kohl, Staff member at DHHS
Timothy is in his mid-50s, and has been with DHHS for more than.
Utah Health Policy Project (UHPP) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization advancing sustainable health care solutions for underserved Utahns through better access, education, and public policy.
CBIZ's very own Todd Hanson is featured in the November edition of the Minneapolis St. Paul Business Journal. Read the panelists' expert opinions about current issues surrounding health care including benefits, mobile health, health education, aca compliance, and more!
Panelists include Todd Hanson, director of client services at CBIZ Benefits & Insurance Services; Jesse Berg, an attorney specializing in health care law at Gray Plant Mooty; John Soshnik, a partner in the health law group at Lindquist & Vennum; Becca Miller, director of employer solutions at Capella Education Co.; and Steven Rush, director of health literacy innovations at UnitedHealth Group Inc. Allison O’Toole, interim CEO at MNsure, served as moderator.
Chapter 4 Where Do We Want to BePrevious sectionNext sectionWilheminaRossi174
Chapter 4 Where Do We Want to Be?
Previous section
Next section
Chapter 4
Where Do We Want to Be?
Even in a country that lacks an overall, cohesive health policy, it is useful to ask: How unhappy are we with our health care, and what do we want to change? Do not expect consistent responses from the American public. When the nation was debating the Clinton health plan, a number of organizations surveyed the public. Respondents reported they believed that the health care system was in trouble. At the same time, they expressed satisfaction with their own largely employer-financed health care programs. Public support for universal coverage was strong, but individuals did not want to pay higher taxes to support it (Peterson, 1995). An ABC New/Washington Post poll in October 1993 showed the following (Schick, 1995):
• 51% of the public favored the Clinton health plan.
• 59% thought that it was better than the existing system.
• Only 19% thought that their care would get better under it, and 34% thought worse care would result.
• However, 57% were against tax increases to pay for it, whereas 40% would be willing to pay.
The American public also appears to be split over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) as a whole. Data about opposition to the act can be misleading, with a significant portion of opposition coming from people who believe the ACA did not go far enough. They would prefer a public option, for example, or a single-payer system. Overall, the public is
negative about the individual mandate and the employer mandate, but is much in favor of the insurance changes that have been implemented. People are confused about the insurance exchange provisions of the act as well. An April 2013 tracking poll found that “about half the public says they do not have enough information about the health reform law to understand how it will impact their own family, a share that rises among the uninsured and low-income households” (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2013). The same poll reported that 42% of respondents did not know that the ACA was still the law of the land. Twelve percent believed it had been repealed by Congress, 7% believed it had been overturned by the Supreme Court, and 23% didn’t know whether it was still in effect or not.
Americans report being in good health more than any other OECD country. Their complaints are mostly about financial risks and to some extent access and waiting. A 2010 study of six developed countries showed that Americans were satisfied with their doctors and the availability of effective care, but were also more likely to report that the system needed to be completely rebuilt (Papanicolas, Cylus, & Smith, 2013).
4.1 Alignment with the Rest of Society
Previous section
Next section
4.1 ALIGNMENT WITH THE REST OF SOCIETY
The democratic process is likely to generate many policy experiments as we cope with advancing technology, changing demographics, political pressures, and economic fluctuations. These exper ...
The following resources have been provided to help you learn mor.docxarnoldmeredith47041
The following resources have been provided to help you learn more about important concepts covered this week. Look for ways to apply these resources to this week’s activities and assignments. Ensure you:
· Read “Price Transparency Needed From All Stakeholders, HFMA Task Force Says” from Modern Healthcare.
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20140416/NEWS/304169931/price-transparency-needed-from-all-stakeholders-hfma-task-force-saysCHAPTER 3
Current Operations of the Healthcare System
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
The student will be able to:
■ Identify the stakeholders of the U.S. healthcare system and their relationships with each other.
■ Discuss the importance of healthcare statistics.
■ Compare the United States to five other countries using different health statistics.
■ List at least five current statistics regarding the U.S. healthcare system.
■ Discuss complementary and alternative medicine and its role in health care.
■ Define OECD and its importance to international health care.
DID YOU KNOW THAT?
■ According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the projection for job growth in the healthcare industry over a 10-year period is 9.8 million jobs by 2024.
■ Most healthcare workers have jobs that do not require a four-year college degree but health diagnostic and treatment providers are the most educated workers in the United States.
■ Healthcare employment is found predominantly in large states such as California, New York, Texas, and Florida.
■ Approximately 40% of U.S. adults use some form of nontraditional medicine.
■ The healthcare industry and social assistance industry reported more work-related injuries than any other private industry.
■ Life expectancy and infant mortality rates are an indication of the health of a population.
▶ Introduction
The one commonality with all of the world’s healthcare systems is that they all have consumers or users of their systems. Systems were developed to provide a service to their citizens. However, the U.S. healthcare system, unlike other systems in the world, does not provide healthcare access to all of its citizens. It is a very complex system that is comprised of many public and private components. Healthcare expenditures comprise approximately 17.5% of the gross domestic product (GDP). Health care is very expensive and most citizens do not have the money to pay for health care themselves. Individuals rely on health insurance to pay a large portion of their healthcare costs. Health insurance is predominantly offered by employers. The uninsured rate remains at an all-time low with 9.1% of under 65 uninsured as of the end of 2015 according to CDC.Gov data. Generally, 2016 saw a rough increase of all the 2015 numbers. (Obamacare enrollment, 2016). The government believes this is the result of the universal mandate for individual health insurance coverage.
In the United States, in order to provide healthcare services, there are several stakeholders or interested entities that participate in the indust.
Medical Technology Tackles New Health Care Demand - Research Report - March 2...pchutichetpong
M Capital Group (“MCG”) predicts that with, against, despite, and even without the global pandemic, the medical technology (MedTech) industry shows signs of continuous healthy growth, driven by smaller, faster, and cheaper devices, growing demand for home-based applications, technological innovation, strategic acquisitions, investments, and SPAC listings. MCG predicts that this should reflects itself in annual growth of over 6%, well beyond 2028.
According to Chris Mouchabhani, Managing Partner at M Capital Group, “Despite all economic scenarios that one may consider, beyond overall economic shocks, medical technology should remain one of the most promising and robust sectors over the short to medium term and well beyond 2028.”
There is a movement towards home-based care for the elderly, next generation scanning and MRI devices, wearable technology, artificial intelligence incorporation, and online connectivity. Experts also see a focus on predictive, preventive, personalized, participatory, and precision medicine, with rising levels of integration of home care and technological innovation.
The average cost of treatment has been rising across the board, creating additional financial burdens to governments, healthcare providers and insurance companies. According to MCG, cost-per-inpatient-stay in the United States alone rose on average annually by over 13% between 2014 to 2021, leading MedTech to focus research efforts on optimized medical equipment at lower price points, whilst emphasizing portability and ease of use. Namely, 46% of the 1,008 medical technology companies in the 2021 MedTech Innovator (“MTI”) database are focusing on prevention, wellness, detection, or diagnosis, signaling a clear push for preventive care to also tackle costs.
In addition, there has also been a lasting impact on consumer and medical demand for home care, supported by the pandemic. Lockdowns, closure of care facilities, and healthcare systems subjected to capacity pressure, accelerated demand away from traditional inpatient care. Now, outpatient care solutions are driving industry production, with nearly 70% of recent diagnostics start-up companies producing products in areas such as ambulatory clinics, at-home care, and self-administered diagnostics.
Global launch of the Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index 2nd wave – alongside...ILC- UK
The Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index is an online tool created by ILC that ranks countries on six metrics including, life span, health span, work span, income, environmental performance, and happiness. The Index helps us understand how well countries have adapted to longevity and inform decision makers on what must be done to maximise the economic benefits that comes with living well for longer.
Alongside the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva on 28 May 2024, we launched the second version of our Index, allowing us to track progress and give new insights into what needs to be done to keep populations healthier for longer.
The speakers included:
Professor Orazio Schillaci, Minister of Health, Italy
Dr Hans Groth, Chairman of the Board, World Demographic & Ageing Forum
Professor Ilona Kickbusch, Founder and Chair, Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute and co-chair, World Health Summit Council
Dr Natasha Azzopardi Muscat, Director, Country Health Policies and Systems Division, World Health Organisation EURO
Dr Marta Lomazzi, Executive Manager, World Federation of Public Health Associations
Dr Shyam Bishen, Head, Centre for Health and Healthcare and Member of the Executive Committee, World Economic Forum
Dr Karin Tegmark Wisell, Director General, Public Health Agency of Sweden
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V PREVENTIVE-PEDIATRICS.pdfSachin Sharma
This content provides an overview of preventive pediatrics. It defines preventive pediatrics as preventing disease and promoting children's physical, mental, and social well-being to achieve positive health. It discusses antenatal, postnatal, and social preventive pediatrics. It also covers various child health programs like immunization, breastfeeding, ICDS, and the roles of organizations like WHO, UNICEF, and nurses in preventive pediatrics.
Antibiotic Stewardship by Anushri Srivastava.pptxAnushriSrivastav
Stewardship is the act of taking good care of something.
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
WHO launched the Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) in 2015 to fill knowledge gaps and inform strategies at all levels.
ACCORDING TO apic.org,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials (including antibiotics), improves patient outcomes, reduces microbial resistance, and decreases the spread of infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.
ACCORDING TO pewtrusts.org,
Antibiotic stewardship refers to efforts in doctors’ offices, hospitals, long term care facilities, and other health care settings to ensure that antibiotics are used only when necessary and appropriate
According to WHO,
Antimicrobial stewardship is a systematic approach to educate and support health care professionals to follow evidence-based guidelines for prescribing and administering antimicrobials
In 1996, John McGowan and Dale Gerding first applied the term antimicrobial stewardship, where they suggested a causal association between antimicrobial agent use and resistance. They also focused on the urgency of large-scale controlled trials of antimicrobial-use regulation employing sophisticated epidemiologic methods, molecular typing, and precise resistance mechanism analysis.
Antimicrobial Stewardship(AMS) refers to the optimal selection, dosing, and duration of antimicrobial treatment resulting in the best clinical outcome with minimal side effects to the patients and minimal impact on subsequent resistance.
According to the 2019 report, in the US, more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant infections occur each year, and more than 35000 people die. In addition to this, it also mentioned that 223,900 cases of Clostridoides difficile occurred in 2017, of which 12800 people died. The report did not include viruses or parasites
VISION
Being proactive
Supporting optimal animal and human health
Exploring ways to reduce overall use of antimicrobials
Using the drugs that prevent and treat disease by killing microscopic organisms in a responsible way
GOAL
to prevent the generation and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Doing so will preserve the effectiveness of these drugs in animals and humans for years to come.
being to preserve human and animal health and the effectiveness of antimicrobial medications.
to implement a multidisciplinary approach in assembling a stewardship team to include an infectious disease physician, a clinical pharmacist with infectious diseases training, infection preventionist, and a close collaboration with the staff in the clinical microbiology laboratory
to prevent antimicrobial overuse, misuse and abuse.
to minimize the developme
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V - ROLE OF PEADIATRIC NURSE.pdfSachin Sharma
Pediatric nurses play a vital role in the health and well-being of children. Their responsibilities are wide-ranging, and their objectives can be categorized into several key areas:
1. Direct Patient Care:
Objective: Provide comprehensive and compassionate care to infants, children, and adolescents in various healthcare settings (hospitals, clinics, etc.).
This includes tasks like:
Monitoring vital signs and physical condition.
Administering medications and treatments.
Performing procedures as directed by doctors.
Assisting with daily living activities (bathing, feeding).
Providing emotional support and pain management.
2. Health Promotion and Education:
Objective: Promote healthy behaviors and educate children, families, and communities about preventive healthcare.
This includes tasks like:
Administering vaccinations.
Providing education on nutrition, hygiene, and development.
Offering breastfeeding and childbirth support.
Counseling families on safety and injury prevention.
3. Collaboration and Advocacy:
Objective: Collaborate effectively with doctors, social workers, therapists, and other healthcare professionals to ensure coordinated care for children.
Objective: Advocate for the rights and best interests of their patients, especially when children cannot speak for themselves.
This includes tasks like:
Communicating effectively with healthcare teams.
Identifying and addressing potential risks to child welfare.
Educating families about their child's condition and treatment options.
4. Professional Development and Research:
Objective: Stay up-to-date on the latest advancements in pediatric healthcare through continuing education and research.
Objective: Contribute to improving the quality of care for children by participating in research initiatives.
This includes tasks like:
Attending workshops and conferences on pediatric nursing.
Participating in clinical trials related to child health.
Implementing evidence-based practices into their daily routines.
By fulfilling these objectives, pediatric nurses play a crucial role in ensuring the optimal health and well-being of children throughout all stages of their development.
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair A New Horizon in Nephrology.pptxR3 Stem Cell
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair: A New Horizon in Nephrology" explores groundbreaking advancements in the use of R3 stem cells for kidney disease treatment. This insightful piece delves into the potential of these cells to regenerate damaged kidney tissue, offering new hope for patients and reshaping the future of nephrology.
R3 Stem Cells and Kidney Repair A New Horizon in Nephrology.pptx
Everybody In! Newsletter - June 2014
1. H E A L T H C A R E - N O W !
Healthcare-NOW! - 215-732-2131 - info@healthcare-now.org - 1315 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19107 - www.Healthcare-Now.org! 1
Everybody In
Healthcare-NOW!’s Quarterly Newsletter on the Single-Payer Healthcare Justice Movement
www.Healthcare-Now.org! Issue No. 5 - Summer 2014
First
Everybody
IN-‐stitutes
a
Success!
Healthcare-‐NOW!
successfully
co-‐
hosted
its
first
two
'Everybody
IN-‐
stitutes'
in
May
2014,
partnering
with
Health
Care
for
All
Texas
in
Houston,
TX
and
Metro
Justice
in
Rochester,
NY.
Healthcare-‐NOW!
launched
the
Everybody
IN-‐stitute
initiative
as
a
way
of
bringing
together
supporters
at
a
local
level
to
develop
skills
and
strategies
for
organizing,
messaging,
outreach,
public
education,
media,
and
legislative
advocacy
for
single-‐
payer
reform.
The
structure
of
the
IN-‐
stitutes
varies
depending
on
the
goals
of
our
local
affiliates,
whether
that
be
advancing
legislation,
growing
the
base
of
supporters
in
the
area,
or
re-‐energizing
an
existing
base.
The
Houston
Everybody
IN-‐stitute
brought
together
40
participants,
representing
a
wide
range
of
organizations
including
Fe
Y
Justicia,
RESULTS,
the
Living
Hope
Wheelchair
Association,
Harris
County
AFL-‐CIO,
the
Houston
Women's
Group,
the
Green
Party
of
Texas,
Texas
Together,
and
the
National
Nurses
Organizing
Committee.
The
training
was
translated
simultaneously
into
English
and
Spanish,
with
all
attendees
who
are
not
bilingual
wearing
ear-‐pieces,
allowing
participants
to
speak
in
whatever
language
was
most
comfortable
for
them.
The
Houston
IN-‐stitute
featured
an
impressive
range
of
educational
plenaries,
as
well
as
action-‐oriented
workshops.
HCFAT
board
member
Khris
Schneider
provided
an
overview
of
where
we're
at
and
where
we
need
to
go
with
our
health
care
system;
Healthcare-‐NOW!
Director
of
Organizing
Benjamin
Day
spoke
about
shifting
from
education
to
mobilization
work;
HCFAT
Twitter
guru
Simi
Bassett
discussed
the
group's
social
media
strategy
and
how
participants
could
get
involved;
and
HCFAT
President
Ken
Kenegos
reviewed
messaging
strategy.
Every
attendee
participate
in
a
breakout
group
designed
to
identify
single-‐
payer
organizing
opportunities
created
by
the
Affordable
Care
Act
in
the
coming
year,
and
an
impressive
range
of
afternoon
workshops
focused
on
developing
organizing
strategy
related
to
legislative
support,
immigrants'
access
to
care,
the
Medicaid
expansion
fight,
the
labor
movement,
women's
health,
and
the
mental
health
field.
The
Rochester
Everybody
IN-‐stitute
drew
25
activists
from
all
over
upstate
and
western
New
York,
including
Albany,
Buffalo,
Ithaca,
Allegany,
and
Rochester.
Dr.
Deb
Richter,
a
native
of
Buffalo,
NY
and
currently
the
President
of
Vermont
Health
Care
for
All,
gave
a
keynote
via
Skype
on
the
organizing
successes
and
ongoing
challenges
of
winning
single
payer
reform
in
Vermont.
Healthcare-‐NOW!
Director
of
Organizing
Benjamin
Day,
and
incoming
Executive
Director
of
Physicians
for
a
National
Health
Program
New
York
Metro
Katie
Robbins,
led
four
workshops
on
developing
organizing
strategy.
The
workshops
focused
on
taking
advantage
of
opportunities
created
by
the
Affordable
Care
Act,
targeting
the
health
insurance
industry,
legislative
strategy,
and
working
with
organized
labor.
Metro
Justice
Organizing
Director
Colin
O'Malley
and
Metro
Justice
activist
Tim
Munier
led
the
group
in
reviewing
and
narrowing
down
the
organizing
ideas
raised
during
the
workshops.
This
discussion
focused
on
the
importance
of
building
an
active
single-‐payer
network
in
upstate
New
York,
and
the
group
decided
on
a
strategy
of
planning
health
care
forums
and
speak
outs
in
key
cities
and
towns
across
upstate
New
York
to
start
building
that
network.
Health
Care
for
All
Texas
Rally
Health
Care
for
All
Texas
INstitute
2. H E A L T H C A R E - N O W !
Healthcare-NOW! - 215-732-2131 - info@healthcare-now.org - 1315 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19107 - www.Healthcare-Now.org! 2
Steve
Early
Speaks
With
Us
About
Labor
and
Single
Payer
Healthcare
Steve
Early
worked
for
27
years
as
an
organizer
and
international
representative
for
the
Communications
Workers
of
America.
He
is
the
author
of
a
new
book
from
Monthly
Review
Press
titled,
Save
Our
Unions:
Dispatches
from
a
Movement
in
Distress.
He
is
working
on
a
book
about
political
change
and
public
policy
innovation
in
Richmond,
California.
Both
your
new
book
Save
Our
Unions:
Dispatches
From
a
Movement
in
Distress—and
your
previous
one,
The
Civil
Wars
in
U.S.
Labor-‐-‐draw
on
your
experience
as
a
union
negotiator
and
longtime
single
payer
activist.
In
2008,
liberal
foundations,
major
unions,
and
the
AFL-‐CIO
created
and
financed
Health
Care
for
American
Now!
(HCAN).
This
lobbying
coalition
had
a
name
similar
to
ours
but
it
soon
distanced
itself
from
the
goal
of
single
payer.
In
retrospect,
what
impact
did
HCAN
have
on
labor’s
quest
for
a
better
health
care
system?
I
think
HCAN
"settled
short"
and
was
too
compliant
with
Obama
Administration
goals.
It
also
went
in
the
wrong
direction
by
embracing
the
notion
that
our
system
could
be
substantially
improved
by
mandating
and
subsidizing
the
purchase
of
private
insurance,
maintaining
employer
plans
where
they
still
exist,
and
offering
a
"public
option"
as
a
not-‐for-‐profit
alternative
for
the
millions
of
new
customers
now
shopping
for
coverage
in
our
state-‐based
insurance
exchanges.
Even
after
the
"public
option"
was
eliminated
from
that
package,
HCAN
over-‐sold
Obamacare
to
its
labor
constituents.
In
retrospect,
we
would
have
been
better
off
if
the
smaller
bloc
of
pro-‐single
payer
unions
and
the
more
influential
(but
always
overly
pragmatic)
organizational
players
in
labor's
mainstream
had
united
around
the
more
modest
goal
of
defending
and
expanding
existing
forms
of
publicly-‐funded
healthcare.
Labor's
top
priority
should
have
been
reversing
the
partial
privatization
of
Medicare-‐-‐through
the
costly
and
inefficient
Medicare
Advantage
program-‐-‐which
Obama
criticized
as
a
presidential
candidate
in
2008.
Lowering
the
eligibility
age
for
Medicare
would
have
been
a
good
incremental
next
step
in
the
direction
of
single
payer.
Unions
and
their
allies
could
also
have
tried
to
insure
more
of
the
low-‐income
uninsured
through
Medicaid
expansion—without
the
option
of
privatizing
it,
which
the
Obama
Administration
is
now
permitting
in
Arkansas,
despite
the
bad
track
record
of
Medicare
HMOs.
Labor
should
also
have
pushed
for
more
federal
support
for
state
level
experiments
with
single-‐payer—which
the
ACA
has
now
complicated
and
delayed.
Pre-‐emptive
improvements
and
better
funding
of
the
VA
system
five
years
ago—instead
of
the
current
emergency
intervention—might
have
strengthened
that
model
of
public
healthcare
delivery,
which
operates
as
a
kind
of
British-‐style
national
health
service
for
those
eligible.
Many
labor
leaders
seem
to
have
a
different
perspective
on
the
Affordable
Care
Act
today
than
when
it
first
passed.
What's
changed?
Unionized
workers
now
face
more,
rather
than
fewer,
health
plan
problems
and
cost
shifting
pressures.
In
frantic
letters
to
Congressional
leaders
last
year,
the
national
presidents
of
the
Teamsters,
Laborers,
Hotel
Employees,
and
United
Food
and
Commercial
Workers
unions
warned
that
the
ACA’s
"unintended
consequences"
were
multiplying
to
the
point
where
millions
of
workers,
retirees,
and
their
families
face
"nightmare
scenarios."
Union
members
were
told,
correctly,
that
the
ACA
would
expand
Medicaid
access
for
millions
of
lower-‐income
Americans
and
make
some
important
insurance
market
reforms.
But
organized
labor
also
expected
that
this
type
of
health
care
reform
would
aid
union
bargaining
by
leveling
the
playing
field
among
all
employers,
much
like
the
minimum
wage
and
other
protective
labor
legislation
does.
Union
officials
believed,
mistakenly,
that
the
ACA
would
restrain
medical
cost
inflation
and
corporate
pressure
for
health
care
give-‐
backs.
Instead,
those
trends
have
continued
to
be
a
major
cause
of
strikes
and/or
contract
rejections
at
AT&T,
Verizon,
United
Parcel
Service,
Boeing,
and
other
big
employers.
In
industries
with
multi-‐
employer
Taft-‐Hartley
health
care
trusts,
those
are
being
undermined
and
put
a
competitive
disadvantage
by
the
ACA.
Some
of
the
worst
is
yet
to
come.
In
both
the
private
and
public
sector,
employers
are
already
citing
the
ACA's
2018
tax
on
mis-‐named
"Cadillac
coverage"
to
justify
further
givebacks
from
workers
who,
in
reality,
only
have
a
healthcare
Chevy
in
their
garage.
And
this
is
no
"unintended
consequence"
of
the
law—it’s
what
it
was
designed
to
do.
According
to
MIT
professor
Jonathan
Gruber,
a
top
White
House
consultant,
this
impending
40
percent
excise
tax
on
higher
cost
plans
"is
intended
to
shift
compensation
away
from
excessively
generous
health
insurance
to
wages."
Only
someone
completely
disconnected
from
U.S.
labor
relations
reality
would
claim
that
more
premium
sharing,
higher
deductibles
and
bigger
co-‐pays
will
translate
into
better
pay
for
workers,
who
will,
instead,
continue
to
suffer
from
little
or
no
real
wage
growth
because
of
such
cost
chifting.
Steve
Early
3. H E A L T H C A R E - N O W !
Healthcare-NOW! - 215-732-2131 - info@healthcare-now.org - 1315 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19107 - www.Healthcare-Now.org! 3
National
Single-‐Payer
Lobby
Day
Does
this
crisis
represent
a
new
opportunity
for
single-‐payer
activists
to
work
with
organized
labor?
It's
a
definitely
a
great
opportunity
to
revive
and
strengthen
the
campaign
for
Medicare
for
All,
but
one
fraught
with
some
political
dangers.
That's
because
the
boomerang
effect
on
labor
and
the
ACA's
widely
publicized
implementation
screw-‐ups
may
also
end
up
discrediting
health
care
reform
in
general.
Several
hundred
labor
activists
met
in
Chicago
in
early
2013
under
the
auspices
of
the
Labor
Campaign
for
Single-‐Payer
Health
Care.
More
than
fifty
unions
and
ten
city
or
state
labor
councils
were
represented
at
this
gathering.
Everyone
saw
new
openings
to
woo
national
and
local
unions
previously
more
wedded
to
job-‐based
health
coverage
and
their
own
multi-‐employer
welfare
funds.
Later
last
year,
the
Labor
Campaign
collected
hundreds
of
signatures
on
an
"Open
Letter
to
the
AFL-‐CIO
from
Concerned
Trade
Unionists"
that
was
distributed
at
the
federation's
convention
in
Los
Angeles.
The
letter
criticized
the
ACA
as
the
product
of
lobbying
by
a
private
insurance
industry
"whose
business
model
relies
on
a
failing
employment-‐based
system
and
whose
profits
depend
on
shifting
costs
onto
the
backs
of
workers
while
reducing
choice
and
quality
of
care."
However,
even
after
some
AFL-‐CIO
convention
delegates
spent
much
time
venting
about
President
Obama’s
failure
to
"fix"
the
ACA,
only
a
few
national
unions
have
actually
gone
out,
educated
their
members
about
this
problem,
and
mobilized
them
accordingly.
That
job,
as
always,
will
have
to
be
done
at
the
grassroots,
from
the
bottom
up—every
time
a
public
or
private
sector
union
contract
is
up
for
renegotiation
and
management
is
seeking
health
care
give-‐
backs.
For
those
who
would
like
to
learn
more
about
fighting
for
health
care
as
a
human
right
within
the
labor
movement
or
in
solidarity
with
the
labor
movement,
what
further
reading
and
resources
would
you
recommend?
The
Labor
Campaign
for
Single
Payer
has
produced
invaluable
material
for
union
members
on
how
to
deal
with
the
ACA,
while
fighting
for
something
better
at
the
state
or
national
level.
See,
for
example:
www.laborforsinglepayer.org/2013/11/watch-‐
out-‐the-‐aca-‐is-‐coming-‐briefing-‐paper-‐now-‐
available/
The
Campaign
is
also
convening
another
national
strategy
meeting,
co-‐sponsored
by
Healthcare
Now
and
various
unions,
in
late
August
in
California.
To
register,
see:
www.laborforsinglepayer.org/2014/05/
register-‐now-‐for-‐national-‐strategy-‐
conference-‐august-‐22-‐24-‐oakland-‐ca/
Other
union
critiques
of
the
ACA
include
a
recent
UNITE-‐HERE
research
report,
called
The
Irony
of
Obamacare:
Making
Inequality
Worse.
(http://www.unitehere.org/
detail.php?ID=3775)
To
keep
track
of
what’s
happening
in
Vermont,
to
make
health
care
a
human
right
there,
see
www.workerscenter.org!
Healthcare-‐NOW!
joined
a
broad
coalition
of
allied
organizations
for
National
Lobby
Day
on
May
22
to
advance
single-‐payer
legislation.
Almost
one
hundred
advocates
descended
on
Washington,
D.C.
from
eighteen
states,
representing
Healthcare-‐
NOW!,
Physicians
for
a
National
Health
Program,
National
Nurses
United,
Public
Citizen,
Progressive
Democrats
of
America,
the
Labor
Campaign
for
Single
Payer
Health
Care,
Gray
Panthers,
All
Unions
Committee
for
Single
Payer
H.R.
676,
American
Medical
Students
Association,
and
the
National
Organization
of
Women.
Additionally,
Healthcare-‐NOW!
activists
and
affiliates
in
eleven
districts
organized
in-‐district
meetings
with
their
representatives.
Lobby
Day
was
kicked
off
on
May
21
by
a
panel
organized
by
Senator
Bernie
Sanders
on
"Single
Payer:
Where
do
we
go
from
here?"
The
panel,
which
included
Healthcare-‐
NOW!
Board
members
Gerald
Friedman
and
Michael
Lighty,
drew
national
press
coverage.
Senator
Sanders
also
used
the
occasion
to
release
a
new
titled
"Universal
Access,
Lower
Cost:
Why
the
U.S.
Needs
a
Single
Payer
Health
Care
System."
On
May
22
activists
in
D.C.
visited
more
than
40
members
of
the
House
of
Representatives,
urging
them
to
support
H.R.
676,
Rep.
John
Conyers'
"Expanded
and
Improved
Medicare
for
All
Act"
(there
was
also
some
advocacy
for
Rep.
Jim
McDermott’s
bill,
H.R.
1200),
and
at
least
33
members
of
the
Senate
were
asked
to
support
S.
1782,
Sen.
Bernie
Sanders'
"American
Health
Security
Act."
Healthcare-‐NOW!
delivered
over
25,000
petition
signatures
from
constituents
asking
their
legislators
to
enact
single-‐payer
reform,
from
a
joint
online
petition
organized
with
RootsAction.
Public
Citizen
delivered
tens
of
thousands
of
more
petition
signatures
from
their
members
across
the
country,
sending
a
powerful
message
of
support
to
every
member
of
Congress.
A
key
congressman,
Rep.
James
Clyburn
of
South
Carolina,
the
third-‐
ranking
House
Democrat,
signed
on
as
a
co-‐
sponsor
of
H.R.
676
for
the
first
time
following
Lobby
Day
and
the
hard
work
of
local
activists.
Clyburn's
signature
brings
the
current
number
of
H.R.
676
co-‐sponsors
to
57.
(Thanks
to
PNHP
for
compiling
parts
of
the
above
report!)
National
Lobby
Day
in
Washington,
DC
4. H E A L T H C A R E - N O W !
Healthcare-NOW! - 215-732-2131 - info@healthcare-now.org - 1315 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19107 - www.Healthcare-Now.org! 4
In
Memory
of
Tim
Carpenter
By
Benjamin
Day
This
past
May
melanoma
finally
took
Tim
Carpenter,
who
is
best
known
as
the
founder
and
long-‐time
Executive
Director
of
Progressive
Democrats
of
America.
Tim
was
a
fierce
organizer
for
social
justice.
You
will
hear
and
read
many
amazing
tributes
to
Tim,
because
he
was
one
of
those
rare
individuals
who
swoops
into
many
people’s
lives
and
leaves
an
indelible
mark.
Most
of
us
open
ourselves
up
to
a
few
people,
we
change
them
(and
they
change
us)
forever,
but
to
everyone
else
we
are
just
friendly
co-‐
workers,
neighbors,
or
friends.
Tim
was
different.
We
spoke
a
couple
days
before
he
died
and
he
was,
of
course,
organizing.
Tim
only
spoke
and
acted
at
100
miles
per
hour.
Whether
he
was
on
TV,
at
a
rally,
or
asking
about
your
family,
he
communicated
on
a
sort
of
verbal
autobahn
that
left
friends
and
correspondents
breathless
and
disoriented.
His
emails
consisted
of
90%
cheer
leading
and
morale
boosting
for
those
around
him:
“Teamwork!”,
“Onward!”,
“Thanks
for
stepping
up!”,
“Building
the
team!”.
Tim
always
started
with
thanks,
and
ended
with
an
exclamation
mark.
But
what
will
stay
with
me
forever
is
how
Tim
approached
organizing
as
a
person.
My
most
vivid
memory
is
meeting
with
Tim
and
Russell
Freedman
a
few
months
ago
in
downtown
Boston,
where
Tim
received
specialty
care,
commuting
from
Western
Mass.
We
met
at
Legal
Seafoods,
and
after
some
brief
updates
on
the
campaigns
we
were
working
on
together,
Tim
cut
work
discussion
off
(as
he
usually
did),
and
asked
how
I
was
really
doing.
How
are
my
parents?
Am
I
seeing
anyone,
or
am
I
one
of
those
activists
who
sacrifices
everything
for
the
cause?
How
am
I
feeling
about
my
job
at
Healthcare-‐NOW?
How
can
he
can
support
me?
Two
hours
pass,
we
pay
our
bill.
Tim
hugs
me,
and
says
“I
love
you,”
as
he
always
does.
I
tell
him
I
love
him,
too.
Only
when
I’m
seated
in
my
car,
in
the
parking
lot,
do
I
realize
that
Tim
is
receiving
end-‐of-‐life
care
for
a
terminal
illness
–
his
physicians
gave
him
only
a
few
months
to
live
initially,
over
a
year
ago
–
and
yet
he
spends
most
of
our
time
together
asking
how
I’m
doing,
trying
to
support
me,
and
letting
me
know
that
he
loves
me.
We
were
old
friends
but
by
no
means
close
friends.
This
was
just
how
Tim
lived
his
life,
and
it
deeply
challenged
me
to
become
a
better
person.
I
will
miss
Tim
badly,
but
I
have
a
feeling
that
he’ll
continue
to
sit
on
many
of
our
shoulders
for
years
to
come,
shouting
out
encouragement.
Onward!
Affiliate
Updates
Unions
for
Single
Payer
Health
Care
continues
to
add
labor
endorsements
for
HR
676
including
Local
Lodge
1635,
IAMAW,
Albuquerque,
NM.
Find
out
more
at
UnionsForSinglePayer.org.
Single
Payer
Now
organized
dozens
of
events
and
outreach
for
single-‐payer
healthcare
including
an
action
to
protect
Healthy
San
Francisco
and
an
action
at
a
Democratic
Party
fundraiser
featuring
Rep.
Nancy
Pelosi
and
First
Lady
Michelle
Obama.
Find
our
more
at
SinglePayerNow.net.
Healthcare-‐NOW!
New
York
City
joined
a
lobby
day
and
actions
supporting
New
York
Health,
the
New
York
State
single
payer
bill
and
a
May
Day
Rally
in
NYC.
Find
out
more
at
HCN-‐NYC.org.
Health
Care
for
All
Colorado
recently
finished
up
hosting
their
Annual
Meeting
in
Denver,
CO.
Find
out
more
at
HealthCareForAllColorado.org.
Health
Care
for
All
Texas
is
organized
our
first
Everybody
INstitute
in
May.
They
also
host
a
monthly
radio
program
on
the
2nd
Wednesday
of
every
month
at
9:30AM
central
time
on
KPFT
90.1
called
Open
Journal.
Listen
live,
or
to
archives,
at
KPFT.org.
Your
state
update
not
included
here?
Email
us
at
jeff@healthcare-‐now.org!
Don’t
See
Your
Rep.
On
This
List
of
HR
676
Cosponsors?
Call
Them!
866-‐220-‐0044
Reps
Brady
[PA-‐1],
Capuno
[MA-‐7],
Christensen
[VI],
Chu
[CA-‐27],
Clarke
[NY-‐9],
Clay
[MO-‐1],
Clyburn
[SC-‐6],
Cohen
[TN-‐9],
Cummings
[MD-‐7],
Doyle
[PA-‐14],
Edwards
[MD-‐4],
Ellison
[MN-‐5],
Engel
[NY-‐16],
Farr
[CA-‐20],
Fattah
[PA-‐2],
Green
[TX-‐9],
Grijalva
[AZ-‐3],
Gutierrez
[IL-‐4],
Holt
[NJ-‐12],
Honda
[CA-‐17],
Huffman
[CA-‐2],
Jackson-‐Lee
[TX-‐18],
Johnson
[TX-‐30],
Johnson
[GA-‐4],
Lee
[CA-‐13],
Lewis
[GA-‐5],
Lofgren
[CA-‐19],
Lowenthal
[CA-‐47],
McDermott
[WA-‐7],
McGovern
[MA-‐2],
Miller
[CA-‐11],
Moore
[WI-‐4],
Nadler
[NY-‐10],
Nolan
[MN-‐8],
Norton
[DC],
Pingree
[ME-‐1],
Pocan
[WI-‐2],
Rangel
[NY-‐13],
Roybal-‐Allard
[CA-‐40],
Rush
[IL-‐1],
Schakowsky
[IL-‐9],
Scott
[VA-‐3],
Takano
[CA-‐41],
Welch
[VT],
Wilson
[FL-‐24],
and
Yarmuth
[KY-‐3].
National
Strategy
Conference
Join
us
in
Oakland,
CA!
August
22nd
through
24th,
2014.
For
the
first
time,
three
major
national
organizations
for
single-‐payer
advocacy
will
be
combining
their
annual
conferences.
We
anticipate
that
over
300
attendees
will
converge
on
Oakland
from
Healthcare-‐
NOW!,
the
Labor
Campaign
for
Single-‐Payer
Health
Care,
and
the
One
Payer
States
coalition.
This
will
be
a
unique
opportunity
to
learn
from
the
most
effective
single-‐payer
organizing
around
the
country
and
to
strengthen
state
and
national
organizing
efforts
together.
Register
at
healthcare-‐now.org/campaigns/
strat-‐conf
Benjamin
Day
[back]
and
HCN
Board
Members
Bill
Zoda
[tie]
and
Nijmie
Dzurinko
[right]
at
the
PASNAP
Conference