Effects of Human Body and Antenna Orientation
on Dipole Textile Antenna Performance and SAR
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
INTRODUCTIONS
BACKGROUND
PROBLEM STATEMENT
OBJECTIVES
METHODOLOGY
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
 Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)
3
INTRODUCTIONS
4
 Wearable Antennas
 Utilization of textile materials for the development of flexible
wearable systems is rapid due to the recent miniaturization of
wireless devices for body-centric networks communications
technology [2-8].
 The textile antennas can be constructed using ordinary fabric as
dielectric and e.g. conductive tape or fabric as conducting
elements. This enables the antenna to be flexible and
lightweight
 The wearable antenna structure is easy to attach to clothing
and the structure does not limit the possible antenna
placements.
 Antennas that are rigid and massive have limited amount of
places they can be attached to without being uncomfortable to
the user.
5
 Recently, wearable antennas have received growing interest due to the
introduction of personal and body-centric networks communications
technology. Therefore, additional factors and scenarios must be considered for
SAR compliance testing since the antenna is worn closely to human body.
 The influence of different types body models on SAR values has been treated
in the literature [9]. The variation of SAR values with the distance between the
wearable antenna and the human phantom has also been investigated in
some additional studies [9,10].
 Author [13] has discussed the effect of human body towards the SAR
distribution in the human head induced by planar inverted F antenna (PIFA)
and monopole antenna. The effects of antenna orientation were also
considered. The author concluded that human body plays a significant role on
the SAR value in the head and particularly important for the vertical
orientation cases for both antennas investigated.

PROBLEM STATEMENT
6
 However, there is no research to date reported on the effect of the antenna
orientation towards the SAR values in other body part. Most of the previous
research only focused on the effect of the antenna orientation on the antenna
performance and SAR inside the human head only.
 Therefore, this project tends to focus on the SAR values and the energy
absorption when the antenna is placed at several positions in two different
orientations. The results will be discussed in terms of antenna resonant
frequency, radiation pattern, gain and SAR.
PROBLEM STATEMENT (cont.)
OBJECTIVES
1. To investigate the interaction between a single band
textile antenna with human body at 2.4 GHz.
2. To examine the effects of antenna orientation towards
the antenna performance and Specific Absorption Rate
(SAR), considering different antenna positions and
distances between the antenna and voxel human body
model.
Simulation of antenna in free space
Fabricate and measure antenna in free space
Satisfied
Analysis results
No
No
Simulate antenna+body (horizontally position)
Yes
Satisfied
Yes
8
middle chest right chest right waist stomach
METHODOLOGY
Back of body
Simulate 4 different antenna-body distance
Change to vertical position
Satisfied
No
Yes
Frequency (GHz)
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
S
11
(dB)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
simulation
measurement-
shieldit
measurement-
copper tape
METHODOLOGY
denim textile
εr=1.7
tan d=0.025
Substrate:
Fig. 1. (a) The fabricated antenna, (b) Front view,
(c) Back view. Antenna dimensions are in [mm].
(d) the antenna resonance frequency in free space.
(a)
(b)
(c)
METHODOLOGY (cont. )
10
d = 1, 5, 10 and 20mm
Gustav voxel model (38 years old male)
Human body
(a) (b)
(d)
(c)
(e)
(a)
(e)
(d)
(c)
(b)
Fig. 2. Depictions of horizontally and vertically orientated antenna locations. (a) Middle chest, (b) Right
chest, (c) Back, (d) Right Waist, (e) Stomach.
Horizontally Orientated Vertically Orientated
RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSIONS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 The worst case is observed when the horizontally orientated antenna
is placed at 1 mm from the stomach.
Antenna
Position
Horizontal Orientation Vertical Orientation
Antenna-body distance,d Antenna-body distance,d
1 mm 5 mm 10 mm 20 mm 1 mm 5 mm 10 mm 20 mm
Middle
Chest
2.44 -16.35 2.44 -16.84 2.40 -16.97 2.36 -
25.71 2.38 -
24.34 2.36 -
30.69 2.35 -
42.26 2.36 -
23.74
Right
Chest
2.54 -33.77 2.49 -20.06 2.44 -18.75 2.40 -
22.87 2.46 -
18.56 2.44 -
18.44 2.41 -
19.52 2.38 -
29.02
Stomach 2.48 -8.20 2.59 -26.07 2.50 -16.38 2.42 -
14.47 2.46 -
19.25 2.44 -
15.88 2.40 -
16.61 2.35 -
29.48
Back 2.62 -22.73 2.54 -14.42 2.46 -17.21 2.40 -
19.54 2.54 -
13.99 2.45 -
18.51 2.42 -
18.11 2.37 -
24.75
Right
Waist
2.50 -25.49 2.48 -18.79 2.45 -17.46 2.40 -
21.81 2.49 -
16.46 2.45 -
14.78 2.41 -
15.78 2.36 -
23.58
TABLE I. Antenna Resonant Frequency (fr in GHz/S11 in dB)
Horizontal vs. Vertical
Frequency (GHz)
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
S
11
(dB)
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
antenna-free space
antenna+stomach (d=5mm)-H
antenna+back (d=5mm)-H
antenna+stomach (d=20mm)-H
antenna+back (d=20mm)-H
antenna+stomach (d=5mm)-V
antenna+back (d=5mm)-V
antenna+stomach (d=20mm)-V
antenna+back (d=20mm)-V
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
 The gain for horizontally orientated antenna placed at 1 mm from the
stomach and back of the body is negative value which is -7.26 dB and
-3.35 dB respectively. Whereas, the gain value increase for the entire
vertically polarized antenna case investigated.
Fig. 3. Gain of the antenna in horizontal and vertical orientation on
the voxel phantom.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS (cont. )
Middle Chest
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Stomach
-
40 -
30 -
20 -
10 0 10
-
40
-
30
-
20
-
10
0
10
-
40
-
30
-
20
-
10
0
10
-
40
-
30
-
20
-
10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Right Chest
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Back
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Right Waist
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Right Chest
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Middle Chest
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Back
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Stomach
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Right Waist
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Fig. 4. Simulated radiation patterns for antenna placed 1mm from stomach, middle chest, back,
right chest and right waist. (a) E-plane. (b) H-plane.
(a) (b)
Stomach Middle chest
Back
Right waist
Right chest
Stomach Middle chest
Back Right chest
Right waist
CONCLUSIONS
 The presence of the human body significantly detuned the
antenna resonance frequency and altered the antenna
radiation pattern. However, the effects become more
pronounced when the antenna is curved.
 Besides, the antenna orientations and locations produce a
prominent effect on SAR value. SAR is increased up to 16 %
when the textile antenna is horizontally orientated compared
to antenna in vertical orientation.
 Furthermore, the SAR value is significantly influenced by the
antenna locations on the human body and separation distance
between the antenna and human body.
 Therefore, due to this orientation effect, it is better to carefully
choose the best orientation and position to place the antenna
on the human body.
1) I. C. o. N.-I. R. P. (ICNIRP), "Guidelines For Limiting Exposure To Time-Varying
Electric, Magnetic, And Electromagnetic Fields (Up To 300 GHz)," ed: Health
Physics Society, 1998.
2) M. A. R. Osman, et al., "Design and analysis UWB wearable textile antenna," 2011,
pp. 530-533.
3) M. A. R. Osman, M. K. A. Rahim, M. Azfar, N. A. Samsuri, F. Zubir, and K.
Kamardin, "Design, implementation and performance of ultra-wideband textile
antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, vol. 27, pp. 307-325, 2011.
4) N. Chahat, et al., "Design and characterization of an UWB wearable antenna,"
2010, pp. 461-464.
5) M. A. R. Osman, et al., "Embroidered fully textile wearable antenna for medical
monitoring applications," Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 117, pp.
321-337, 2011.
REFERENCES
6) Pekka Salonen, et al., "Effect of Conductive Material on Wearable Antenna Performance: A Case
Study of WLAN Antennas " IEEE Journal, 2004.
7) A. Sani, et al., "Characterisation of ultra wideband wearable antennas and body-centric wireless-
networks in indoor environment," 2008, pp. 135-138.
8) A. Sani, et al., "Time domain characterisation of ultra wideband wearable antennas and radio
propagation for body-centric wireless networks in healthcare applications," 2008, pp. 129-132.
9) Man-Faï Wong, J. (2005). "Modelling of Electromagnetic Wave Interactions with the Human Body."
C. R. Physique 6: 585–594.Pekka Salonen, et al., "Dual-Band E-Shaped Patch Wearable Textile
Antenna," IEEE, pp. 466-469, 2005.
10) M. Z. a. A. Alden, "Calculation of Whole-Body SAR from a 100 MHz Dipole Antenna," Progress In
Electromagnetics Research, vol. 119, pp. 133-153, 2011.
11) Pekka Salonen, et al., "Dual-Band E-Shaped Patch Wearable Textile Antenna," IEEE, pp. 466-469,
2005.
12) N. K. Kouveliotis and C. N. Capsalis, "Prediction of the SAR Level Induced in a Dielectric Sphere
By a Thin Wire Dipole Antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 80, pp. 321–336,
2008.
13) Magdy F. Iskander, et al., "Polarization and Human Body Effects on the Microwave Absorption in a
Human Head Exposed to Radiation from Handheld Devices," IEEE Transactions on Microwave
Theory and Techniques, vol. 48, pp. 1979-1987, November 2000.
REFERENCES

Effects of Human Body and Antenna Orientation on Dipole Textile Antenna Performance and SAR

  • 1.
    Effects of HumanBody and Antenna Orientation on Dipole Textile Antenna Performance and SAR
  • 2.
  • 3.
     Specific AbsorptionRate (SAR) 3 INTRODUCTIONS
  • 4.
    4  Wearable Antennas Utilization of textile materials for the development of flexible wearable systems is rapid due to the recent miniaturization of wireless devices for body-centric networks communications technology [2-8].  The textile antennas can be constructed using ordinary fabric as dielectric and e.g. conductive tape or fabric as conducting elements. This enables the antenna to be flexible and lightweight  The wearable antenna structure is easy to attach to clothing and the structure does not limit the possible antenna placements.  Antennas that are rigid and massive have limited amount of places they can be attached to without being uncomfortable to the user.
  • 5.
    5  Recently, wearableantennas have received growing interest due to the introduction of personal and body-centric networks communications technology. Therefore, additional factors and scenarios must be considered for SAR compliance testing since the antenna is worn closely to human body.  The influence of different types body models on SAR values has been treated in the literature [9]. The variation of SAR values with the distance between the wearable antenna and the human phantom has also been investigated in some additional studies [9,10].  Author [13] has discussed the effect of human body towards the SAR distribution in the human head induced by planar inverted F antenna (PIFA) and monopole antenna. The effects of antenna orientation were also considered. The author concluded that human body plays a significant role on the SAR value in the head and particularly important for the vertical orientation cases for both antennas investigated.  PROBLEM STATEMENT
  • 6.
    6  However, thereis no research to date reported on the effect of the antenna orientation towards the SAR values in other body part. Most of the previous research only focused on the effect of the antenna orientation on the antenna performance and SAR inside the human head only.  Therefore, this project tends to focus on the SAR values and the energy absorption when the antenna is placed at several positions in two different orientations. The results will be discussed in terms of antenna resonant frequency, radiation pattern, gain and SAR. PROBLEM STATEMENT (cont.)
  • 7.
    OBJECTIVES 1. To investigatethe interaction between a single band textile antenna with human body at 2.4 GHz. 2. To examine the effects of antenna orientation towards the antenna performance and Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), considering different antenna positions and distances between the antenna and voxel human body model.
  • 8.
    Simulation of antennain free space Fabricate and measure antenna in free space Satisfied Analysis results No No Simulate antenna+body (horizontally position) Yes Satisfied Yes 8 middle chest right chest right waist stomach METHODOLOGY Back of body Simulate 4 different antenna-body distance Change to vertical position Satisfied No Yes
  • 9.
    Frequency (GHz) 1.5 2.02.5 3.0 3.5 S 11 (dB) -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 simulation measurement- shieldit measurement- copper tape METHODOLOGY denim textile εr=1.7 tan d=0.025 Substrate: Fig. 1. (a) The fabricated antenna, (b) Front view, (c) Back view. Antenna dimensions are in [mm]. (d) the antenna resonance frequency in free space. (a) (b) (c)
  • 10.
    METHODOLOGY (cont. ) 10 d= 1, 5, 10 and 20mm Gustav voxel model (38 years old male) Human body (a) (b) (d) (c) (e) (a) (e) (d) (c) (b) Fig. 2. Depictions of horizontally and vertically orientated antenna locations. (a) Middle chest, (b) Right chest, (c) Back, (d) Right Waist, (e) Stomach. Horizontally Orientated Vertically Orientated
  • 11.
  • 12.
    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The worst case is observed when the horizontally orientated antenna is placed at 1 mm from the stomach. Antenna Position Horizontal Orientation Vertical Orientation Antenna-body distance,d Antenna-body distance,d 1 mm 5 mm 10 mm 20 mm 1 mm 5 mm 10 mm 20 mm Middle Chest 2.44 -16.35 2.44 -16.84 2.40 -16.97 2.36 - 25.71 2.38 - 24.34 2.36 - 30.69 2.35 - 42.26 2.36 - 23.74 Right Chest 2.54 -33.77 2.49 -20.06 2.44 -18.75 2.40 - 22.87 2.46 - 18.56 2.44 - 18.44 2.41 - 19.52 2.38 - 29.02 Stomach 2.48 -8.20 2.59 -26.07 2.50 -16.38 2.42 - 14.47 2.46 - 19.25 2.44 - 15.88 2.40 - 16.61 2.35 - 29.48 Back 2.62 -22.73 2.54 -14.42 2.46 -17.21 2.40 - 19.54 2.54 - 13.99 2.45 - 18.51 2.42 - 18.11 2.37 - 24.75 Right Waist 2.50 -25.49 2.48 -18.79 2.45 -17.46 2.40 - 21.81 2.49 - 16.46 2.45 - 14.78 2.41 - 15.78 2.36 - 23.58 TABLE I. Antenna Resonant Frequency (fr in GHz/S11 in dB)
  • 13.
    Horizontal vs. Vertical Frequency(GHz) 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 S 11 (dB) -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 antenna-free space antenna+stomach (d=5mm)-H antenna+back (d=5mm)-H antenna+stomach (d=20mm)-H antenna+back (d=20mm)-H antenna+stomach (d=5mm)-V antenna+back (d=5mm)-V antenna+stomach (d=20mm)-V antenna+back (d=20mm)-V
  • 14.
    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS The gain for horizontally orientated antenna placed at 1 mm from the stomach and back of the body is negative value which is -7.26 dB and -3.35 dB respectively. Whereas, the gain value increase for the entire vertically polarized antenna case investigated. Fig. 3. Gain of the antenna in horizontal and vertical orientation on the voxel phantom.
  • 15.
    RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS(cont. ) Middle Chest -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Stomach - 40 - 30 - 20 - 10 0 10 - 40 - 30 - 20 - 10 0 10 - 40 - 30 - 20 - 10 0 10 - 40 - 30 - 20 - 10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Right Chest -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Back -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Right Waist -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Right Chest -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Middle Chest -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Back -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Stomach -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Right Waist -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Fig. 4. Simulated radiation patterns for antenna placed 1mm from stomach, middle chest, back, right chest and right waist. (a) E-plane. (b) H-plane. (a) (b) Stomach Middle chest Back Right waist Right chest Stomach Middle chest Back Right chest Right waist
  • 16.
    CONCLUSIONS  The presenceof the human body significantly detuned the antenna resonance frequency and altered the antenna radiation pattern. However, the effects become more pronounced when the antenna is curved.  Besides, the antenna orientations and locations produce a prominent effect on SAR value. SAR is increased up to 16 % when the textile antenna is horizontally orientated compared to antenna in vertical orientation.  Furthermore, the SAR value is significantly influenced by the antenna locations on the human body and separation distance between the antenna and human body.  Therefore, due to this orientation effect, it is better to carefully choose the best orientation and position to place the antenna on the human body.
  • 17.
    1) I. C.o. N.-I. R. P. (ICNIRP), "Guidelines For Limiting Exposure To Time-Varying Electric, Magnetic, And Electromagnetic Fields (Up To 300 GHz)," ed: Health Physics Society, 1998. 2) M. A. R. Osman, et al., "Design and analysis UWB wearable textile antenna," 2011, pp. 530-533. 3) M. A. R. Osman, M. K. A. Rahim, M. Azfar, N. A. Samsuri, F. Zubir, and K. Kamardin, "Design, implementation and performance of ultra-wideband textile antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, vol. 27, pp. 307-325, 2011. 4) N. Chahat, et al., "Design and characterization of an UWB wearable antenna," 2010, pp. 461-464. 5) M. A. R. Osman, et al., "Embroidered fully textile wearable antenna for medical monitoring applications," Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 117, pp. 321-337, 2011. REFERENCES
  • 18.
    6) Pekka Salonen,et al., "Effect of Conductive Material on Wearable Antenna Performance: A Case Study of WLAN Antennas " IEEE Journal, 2004. 7) A. Sani, et al., "Characterisation of ultra wideband wearable antennas and body-centric wireless- networks in indoor environment," 2008, pp. 135-138. 8) A. Sani, et al., "Time domain characterisation of ultra wideband wearable antennas and radio propagation for body-centric wireless networks in healthcare applications," 2008, pp. 129-132. 9) Man-Faï Wong, J. (2005). "Modelling of Electromagnetic Wave Interactions with the Human Body." C. R. Physique 6: 585–594.Pekka Salonen, et al., "Dual-Band E-Shaped Patch Wearable Textile Antenna," IEEE, pp. 466-469, 2005. 10) M. Z. a. A. Alden, "Calculation of Whole-Body SAR from a 100 MHz Dipole Antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, vol. 119, pp. 133-153, 2011. 11) Pekka Salonen, et al., "Dual-Band E-Shaped Patch Wearable Textile Antenna," IEEE, pp. 466-469, 2005. 12) N. K. Kouveliotis and C. N. Capsalis, "Prediction of the SAR Level Induced in a Dielectric Sphere By a Thin Wire Dipole Antenna," Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER 80, pp. 321–336, 2008. 13) Magdy F. Iskander, et al., "Polarization and Human Body Effects on the Microwave Absorption in a Human Head Exposed to Radiation from Handheld Devices," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 48, pp. 1979-1987, November 2000. REFERENCES

Editor's Notes

  • #5 Utilization of textile materials for the development of flexible wearable systems is rapid due to the recent miniaturization of wireless devices. As wearable computing is developing, there is an increasing need for a wireless wearable system with antennas playing a decisive role. In addition, an increasing interest in wearable antennas and electronics in civil, medical, sport wear and military domains become more visible. In personal electronics, antennas play a paramount role in an optimal design of the wearable or hand-held units used in personal electronics. This has resulted in demand for flexible fabric antennas, which can be easily attached to a piece of clothing. The textile antennas can be constructed using ordinary fabric as dielectric and e.g. conductive tape or fabric as conducting elements. This enables the antenna to be flexible and lightweight. Hence, the proposed antenna structure is easy to attach to clothing and the structure does not limit the possible antenna placements. Conventionally, antennas that are rigid and massive have limited amount of places they can be attached to without being uncomfortable to the user.
  • #10 Antenna model is simulated in free space. The antenna resonated at 2.4 GHz The antenna is fabricated and measured for validation purposes considering 2 different conducting material.
  • #11 In this paper, the human body is modelled as Gustav (38 years old male) made available by the CST. The size is approximately 176 mm with 69 kg of mass. In order to investigate the effect of bending towards the antenna performance and SAR values, the antenna is placed on human arm with four radius of curvature; 80, 70, 60 and 50 mm The results will be compared with the 0 mm representing the flat condition (no curvature). In addition to that, the separation distances between the textile antenna and the body are varied to 1, 5, 10 and 20 mm respectively. These distances are chosen to mimic the actual position of where the wearable antenna usually being placed while in used.
  • #13 The results will be compared with the 0 mm representing the flat condition (no curvature) in free space and in the presence of the human arm
  • #15 The gain for horizontally orientated antenna placed at 1 mm from the stomach and back of the body is negative value which is -7.26 dB and -3.35 dB respectively. Whereas, the gain value increase for the entire vertically polarized antenna case investigated. This is because of the reflection caused by the human body as depicted by the antenna radiation pattern in Fig. 7 (a).
  • #16 Antenna mounted horizontally on the stomach and back of the body show significant deterioration of the E-plane and H-plane radiation pattern. The antenna radiation patterns in E-plane and H-plane have been computed at the frequency investigated for three different configurations: antenna alone, antenna in vertical orientation and antenna in horizontal orientation placed at 1 mm from each on-body locations investigated. The presence of the human body has significantly distorts the radiation pattern in the E-plane and H-plane as shown in Fig. 7. The radiation pattern of the dipole antenna is significantly distorted along the direction of the body due to the blocking effect by the arm and some absorptions of the radiated energy by the human body tissues. Antenna mounted horizontally on the stomach and back of the body show significant deterioration of the E-plane and H-plane radiation pattern.
  • #17 This SAR increment for horizontally orientated antenna is in good agreement for all the antenna location investigated.