1. Drupal Vs Adobe CQ 5
Contentmanagementsystemsare onthe rise inthe financial markets.Recentstudiesshows
that contentmanagementsystemshave become ahighpriorityformanybusinesses.Inthisage of
citizenjournalismandblogpostsandfree flowingarticlesoverthe web,manycompanieshave a
basicrequirementthatenablesthemtolockdownontheircontentmanagementsystemtomake
thingseasier.While creatingthis,manycompaniesneedtocreate onlinecommunitiestoshare,
distribute andcategorize theirworkload.MostITor Businessprofessional have sidewithusingsuch
systemsasan effective waytogrowyourventure andgetto target goalslockedinas youstart to
execute yourbusinessplans.The currentmarketholdvariouscontentmanagementsystemsbut
Drupal and Adobe CQ5 seemtostand outfor twoverydifferentreasonsandhere iswhy.
Drupal
Drupal is a verypopularcontentmanagementsystemthatiscurrentlygrowinginthe
industry.Drupal hasitsbasic frameworksourcedonPHPand thismakesithighlymanageable and
easyto use.Since itishas beendevelopedusingPHPitisalsoopensource whichenablesyouto
customize the systemtoyourpreferences.AnotherpluspointisthatDrupal has several thousand3rd
party modules whichmake iteasiertouse.Drupal canbe usedforany product;website orcompany
all youhave to do is specifyitsuses. The easy-to-usedeploymentdashboardhelpsme andmyteam
to deliverprojectstoclient'svalidationandproductionenvironmentmuchfaster. The downsideto
Drupal is that youcannot uploadnon-Drupal basedcontentonthe cloud.Thisishighlyirksomeas
youhave to converteverythinginDrupal touse it andstore it. Anotherdownside toDrupal isthat
the newupgradedversionhasa confusinginterface. Asof now, Drupal doesn’thave node.jssupport
but itis likelytobe developedinthe nearfuture.
Adobe CQ5
The bestthingabout Adobe CQis thatit iseasyto use.Non-technical peoplecanuse Adobe
CQ5 withease and still manage tofocuson the needsof the projectratherthan the technical
difficulties.However, if youwanttoimplementmore customizationandsome technical contentit
becomesslightlydifficulttofigure outforbothtechnical people andcontentcreators.CQisvery
helpful if youwanttomanage contenton multiplesitessimultaneouslywithouthavingto
individuallyconfigure eachsite andthe pagesforyour content.Evenif youhave extensive media
librarieslikesounds,picturesandvideos,CQisseamlesstouse acrossthese platforms.The Digital
AssetManageris verypowerful anditcan be of greathelpwhenyouwantto seamlesslyintegrate
your mediawithyourcontent.The downsidetoCQ5 isthat it isan expensive optionasopposedto
othercontentmanagementsystems.The communitythatusesCQ5isrelativelysmallhence there
are nota lotof reference peopleavailable.Butwithitsgaininpopularityandthe rapidinterestit
generatesitissure to growoverthe nextcouple of years.
In conclusion,Drupal isagood optionif youare a single developerandknow yourway
aroundthe technical aspectsof contentmanagementsystems.Butif youhave some extracash flow
and youdon’thave the technical know-how,thenthe Adobe CQ5isa good optionforyou.