SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Doctoral Defense
Kristin Albright Waters
April 1, 2016, 3:00pm
Topic Review
 Professional Staff Senate
 Taskforce – Flexible Work Life Balance
 Personal Experience
 Two jobs and teleworking
 Gap in the literature
 Lived experience
 Higher Education
The Lived Experience of Teleworking:
A Case Study from the Higher Education Environment
Research Questions
 RQ #1: What are the lived experiences of exempt
employees who telework?
 Results = Chapter 4
 Narratives of the lived experiences
 RQ #2: Do these employees experience fit as outlined
by the Concept of Fit theoretical framework?
 Results = Chapter 5
 Findings organized by the theoretical framework
Theoretical Framework:
Concept of Fit
DISTRIBUTED WORK ARRANGEMENTS
Figure 1. A framework for studying distributed work arrangements (Belanger & Collins, 1998).
Organizational
Characteristics
Individual
Characteristics
Work
Characteristics
Technology
Characteristics
FIT Outcomes
Societal
IndividualOrganizational
Theoretical Framework:
Concept of Fit
SUMMARY OF MODEL VARIABLES
Organizational Characteristics Examples
Organizational objectives Cost savings, increased productivity and employee demands/incentives
Organizational culture Employee commitment and loyalty
Organizational control mechanisms Outcome, behavioral, personal, and clan controls
Individual Characteristics Examples
Individual objectives Cost savings, control of work schedule
Individual skills Technical and problem solving-skills, communication, reliability and
self-sufficiency
Work Characteristics Examples
Communication pattern Base on task type: high or low information exchange requirements
Coordination requirements Based on task type: standardized, scheduled, mutual agreement and team
coordination
Technology Characteristics Examples
Security requirement Appropriate equipment and furniture, information ownership and control
established
Physical setup Quiet space, access to appropriate equipment and support
Outcomes Examples
Societal Reduced pollution, work provided in low employment areas
Organizational Increased productivity, employee retention, reduced overhead
Individual Increased satisfaction, control of work schedule, increased productivity,
reduced commuting time and costs, stress from work-family conflicts
Figure 2. Summary of model variables.
Participant Profile
Demographic Characteristics of Participants
Participant Gender Ethnicity
Participant
Code
Telework
Day
Bertha F AA 1 Monday
Laya F AA 2 Wednesday
Mindi F C 3 Wednesday
Paul M C 4 Tuesday
Oobleck M C 5 Monday
Terry F SEA 6 Wednesday
Lynn F C 7 Wednesday
Lucy F C 8 Friday
Jim Hatfield M C 9 N/A
Wendy F AA 10 Friday
Anne F C 11 N/A
Note. F = Female; M = Male; AA = African American; C = Caucasian; SEA =
Southeast Asian.
Findings
Similar experiences among
participants
Plan tasks to ‘save’ for telework day
Distractions in the office/focus
Email – first ‘thing’ they do on
telework day
Supportive supervisors
Commute
Technology: internet and computer
Want to telework more
Office of support
Unique experiences among
participants
Communication with office
Start and end time of telework day
Personal tasks
Distraction at home
Technology
Tasks – processing/creativity
Negative thoughts/perceptions
RQ #1: What are the lived experiences of exempt employees who telework?
RQ #2: Do these employees experience fit as outlined by the Concept of Fit
theoretical framework?
Findings, Con’t.
 4 characteristics = all present
 Fit = participants not aware of framework
 3 outcomes = all present
 Overall, participants experience fit as outlined by the
Concept of Fit theoretical framework.
Recommendations
RECOMMENDED MODIFICATION TO DISTRIBUTED WORK ARRANGEMENTS
Figure 1. A recommended framework (Belanger & Collins, 199) for studying distributed work
arrangements. The dashed line is the recommended addition posed by the researcher.
Organizational
Characteristics
Individual
Characteristics
Work
Characteristics
Technology
Characteristics
FIT Outcomes
Societal
IndividualOrganizational
Implications for Future Research
 Further analysis of Concept of Fit
 Modification to Concept of Fit
 Gender roles
 Supervisory style/relationship
 Results Oriented/Only Workplace Environment (ROWE)
 Day of Week for teleworking
Next Steps
 Publish findings
 ProQuest
 World at Work
 AACRAO
 Additional analysis
 New study utilizing Concept of Fit
 Further analysis with current data
 Policy modification
 HR representations at site institution
 Presentations
 Site Institution: Professional Staff Senate/President’s Council
 Regional and National Organizations: World at Work/HR/HigherEd
 System schools with teleworking policy
Thank you
 Questions?
 Comments?

More Related Content

Similar to Doctoral Defense 4.1.16 (2)

Workshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docx
Workshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docxWorkshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docx
Workshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docxdunnramage
 
Course Description_B Tech-1.doc
Course Description_B Tech-1.docCourse Description_B Tech-1.doc
Course Description_B Tech-1.docSohamLingwat
 
PG Business School exam preparation
PG Business School exam preparationPG Business School exam preparation
PG Business School exam preparationAndrew Chambers
 
Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):
Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):
Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):Debrief2Learn
 
Assessment for learning
Assessment for learningAssessment for learning
Assessment for learningTansy Jessop
 
Performance review, by Michael Orton
Performance review, by Michael OrtonPerformance review, by Michael Orton
Performance review, by Michael OrtonSean Fowler
 
Week5a writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2
Week5a   writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2Week5a   writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2
Week5a writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2Hafizul Mukhlis
 
Be ch 7 assessing students progress
Be ch 7   assessing students  progressBe ch 7   assessing students  progress
Be ch 7 assessing students progressAbdelaziz Aittaleb
 
Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...
Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...
Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...Christopher Deneen
 
Institute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NR
Institute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NRInstitute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NR
Institute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NRShannon Day
 
Language Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL Learners
Language Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL LearnersLanguage Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL Learners
Language Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL LearnersEFL Learning
 
Mohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017 .docx
Mohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017       .docxMohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017       .docx
Mohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017 .docxgilpinleeanna
 
MD First Performance Review 1.docx
MD First Performance Review 1.docxMD First Performance Review 1.docx
MD First Performance Review 1.docxMeganDutton1
 

Similar to Doctoral Defense 4.1.16 (2) (20)

CAPACRAO Webinar 2016
CAPACRAO Webinar 2016CAPACRAO Webinar 2016
CAPACRAO Webinar 2016
 
Workshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docx
Workshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docxWorkshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docx
Workshop 2Interviewing Skills and PreparationPresent.docx
 
Course Description_B Tech-1.doc
Course Description_B Tech-1.docCourse Description_B Tech-1.doc
Course Description_B Tech-1.doc
 
PG Business School exam preparation
PG Business School exam preparationPG Business School exam preparation
PG Business School exam preparation
 
Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):
Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):
Promoting Excellence And Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS):
 
Assessment for learning
Assessment for learningAssessment for learning
Assessment for learning
 
Performance review, by Michael Orton
Performance review, by Michael OrtonPerformance review, by Michael Orton
Performance review, by Michael Orton
 
Week5a writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2
Week5a   writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2Week5a   writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2
Week5a writing statement of the problem & general purpose 2
 
Paraeducator Training: Making the Decisions and Finding the Materials That Me...
Paraeducator Training: Making the Decisions and Finding the Materials That Me...Paraeducator Training: Making the Decisions and Finding the Materials That Me...
Paraeducator Training: Making the Decisions and Finding the Materials That Me...
 
Essay On Exam 05002200
Essay On Exam 05002200Essay On Exam 05002200
Essay On Exam 05002200
 
HR Best Practices Workshop
HR Best Practices WorkshopHR Best Practices Workshop
HR Best Practices Workshop
 
Staff selection2
Staff selection2Staff selection2
Staff selection2
 
Be ch 7 assessing students progress
Be ch 7   assessing students  progressBe ch 7   assessing students  progress
Be ch 7 assessing students progress
 
Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...
Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...
Technology-enhanced assessment and feedback: What should (and shouldn’t) we b...
 
Institute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NR
Institute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NRInstitute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NR
Institute for Co-operative Education Competency survey results-NR
 
REEP In-service Sept 2009: Unit Planning, Part 1
REEP In-service Sept 2009: Unit Planning, Part 1REEP In-service Sept 2009: Unit Planning, Part 1
REEP In-service Sept 2009: Unit Planning, Part 1
 
UVic School of Public Administration - Student Groups
UVic School of Public Administration - Student GroupsUVic School of Public Administration - Student Groups
UVic School of Public Administration - Student Groups
 
Language Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL Learners
Language Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL LearnersLanguage Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL Learners
Language Assessment - Assessing Speaking byEFL Learners
 
Mohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017 .docx
Mohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017       .docxMohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017       .docx
Mohammad Al yousifMGMT 3100Paisley Stidham2162017 .docx
 
MD First Performance Review 1.docx
MD First Performance Review 1.docxMD First Performance Review 1.docx
MD First Performance Review 1.docx
 

Doctoral Defense 4.1.16 (2)

  • 1. Doctoral Defense Kristin Albright Waters April 1, 2016, 3:00pm
  • 2. Topic Review  Professional Staff Senate  Taskforce – Flexible Work Life Balance  Personal Experience  Two jobs and teleworking  Gap in the literature  Lived experience  Higher Education The Lived Experience of Teleworking: A Case Study from the Higher Education Environment
  • 3. Research Questions  RQ #1: What are the lived experiences of exempt employees who telework?  Results = Chapter 4  Narratives of the lived experiences  RQ #2: Do these employees experience fit as outlined by the Concept of Fit theoretical framework?  Results = Chapter 5  Findings organized by the theoretical framework
  • 4. Theoretical Framework: Concept of Fit DISTRIBUTED WORK ARRANGEMENTS Figure 1. A framework for studying distributed work arrangements (Belanger & Collins, 1998). Organizational Characteristics Individual Characteristics Work Characteristics Technology Characteristics FIT Outcomes Societal IndividualOrganizational
  • 5. Theoretical Framework: Concept of Fit SUMMARY OF MODEL VARIABLES Organizational Characteristics Examples Organizational objectives Cost savings, increased productivity and employee demands/incentives Organizational culture Employee commitment and loyalty Organizational control mechanisms Outcome, behavioral, personal, and clan controls Individual Characteristics Examples Individual objectives Cost savings, control of work schedule Individual skills Technical and problem solving-skills, communication, reliability and self-sufficiency Work Characteristics Examples Communication pattern Base on task type: high or low information exchange requirements Coordination requirements Based on task type: standardized, scheduled, mutual agreement and team coordination Technology Characteristics Examples Security requirement Appropriate equipment and furniture, information ownership and control established Physical setup Quiet space, access to appropriate equipment and support Outcomes Examples Societal Reduced pollution, work provided in low employment areas Organizational Increased productivity, employee retention, reduced overhead Individual Increased satisfaction, control of work schedule, increased productivity, reduced commuting time and costs, stress from work-family conflicts Figure 2. Summary of model variables.
  • 6. Participant Profile Demographic Characteristics of Participants Participant Gender Ethnicity Participant Code Telework Day Bertha F AA 1 Monday Laya F AA 2 Wednesday Mindi F C 3 Wednesday Paul M C 4 Tuesday Oobleck M C 5 Monday Terry F SEA 6 Wednesday Lynn F C 7 Wednesday Lucy F C 8 Friday Jim Hatfield M C 9 N/A Wendy F AA 10 Friday Anne F C 11 N/A Note. F = Female; M = Male; AA = African American; C = Caucasian; SEA = Southeast Asian.
  • 7. Findings Similar experiences among participants Plan tasks to ‘save’ for telework day Distractions in the office/focus Email – first ‘thing’ they do on telework day Supportive supervisors Commute Technology: internet and computer Want to telework more Office of support Unique experiences among participants Communication with office Start and end time of telework day Personal tasks Distraction at home Technology Tasks – processing/creativity Negative thoughts/perceptions RQ #1: What are the lived experiences of exempt employees who telework? RQ #2: Do these employees experience fit as outlined by the Concept of Fit theoretical framework?
  • 8. Findings, Con’t.  4 characteristics = all present  Fit = participants not aware of framework  3 outcomes = all present  Overall, participants experience fit as outlined by the Concept of Fit theoretical framework.
  • 9. Recommendations RECOMMENDED MODIFICATION TO DISTRIBUTED WORK ARRANGEMENTS Figure 1. A recommended framework (Belanger & Collins, 199) for studying distributed work arrangements. The dashed line is the recommended addition posed by the researcher. Organizational Characteristics Individual Characteristics Work Characteristics Technology Characteristics FIT Outcomes Societal IndividualOrganizational
  • 10. Implications for Future Research  Further analysis of Concept of Fit  Modification to Concept of Fit  Gender roles  Supervisory style/relationship  Results Oriented/Only Workplace Environment (ROWE)  Day of Week for teleworking
  • 11. Next Steps  Publish findings  ProQuest  World at Work  AACRAO  Additional analysis  New study utilizing Concept of Fit  Further analysis with current data  Policy modification  HR representations at site institution  Presentations  Site Institution: Professional Staff Senate/President’s Council  Regional and National Organizations: World at Work/HR/HigherEd  System schools with teleworking policy