Let's address these issues through a
multidisciplinary approach:
1. Optimize pain control
2. Engage chaplain/social work for emotional support
3. Explore faith/legacy through chaplain
4. Involve family for familiarity/comfort
5. Consider non-pharm interventions like massage
This comprehensive approach may help resolve his agitation.
Delirium Management
STEP 3: PHARMACOLOGIC APPROACH
When non-pharmacologic approaches are not sufficient
or the patient is a danger to self or others.
Pharmacologic Approach
• Benzodiazepines: lorazepam, midazolam
- Short
1. Delirium:
Recognizing, Assessing and Managing Terminal Restlessness
Suzana Makowski, MD MMM
Associate Director of Palliative Care in the Cancer Center
UMass Memorial Healthcare, Worcester, MA
JoAnne Nowak, MD
Medical Director, Merrimack Valley Hospice, Lawrence, MA
Special thanks to Jennifer Reidy, MD who helped prepare the content
3. Which symptom is necessary for the diagnosis of delirium?
a) impairment of only short term memory
b) impairment of attention
c) agitation or restlessness
d) delusions or hallucinations
6. Early Descriptions
“they move the face, hunt in “Sick people…lose their judgment
empty air, pluck nap from the and talk incoherently…when
bedclothes…all these signs are the violence of the fit is abated,
bad, in fact deadly” the judgment presently
returns…”
Hippocrates:400 BCE Celsus: 1st Century BCE
7. Delirium
• Synonyms: acute confusional state, organic
brain syndrome, encephalopathy, terminal
agitation, terminal restlessness
• Often mistaken for depression, anxiety, or
dementia
Terminal Agitation:
A symptom or sign: thrashing, agitation that may occur in the last days
or hours of life.
May be caused by:
• pain • anxiety • dyspnea • delirium
8. DSM-IV Criteria: Delirium
• Disturbance of consciousness affecting attention
• Change in cognition
• Develops over a short period of time, and may
fluctuate
• Caused by physiologic consequence of a general
medical condition
9. Clinical Subtypes: Delirium
Less likely to
be diagnosed
Mixed
• Confusion • Confusion
• Agitation • Fluctuates • Somnolence
• Hallucinations between both • Withdrawn
• Myoclonus
Hyperactive Hypoactive
10. Delirium vs. Dementia vs. Depression
Features Delirium Dementia Depression
Onset Acute (hours to Insidious (months to Acute or Insidious
days) years) (wks to months)
Course Fluctuating Progressive May be chronic
Duration Hours to weeks Months to years Months to years
Consciousness Altered Usually clear Clear
Attention Impaired Normal except in May be decreased
severe dementia
Psychomotor Increased or Often normal May be slowed in
changes decreased severe cases
Reversibility Usually Irreversible Usually
11. Dying with Dementia
Agitation • 87%
Confusion • 83%
J. Geriatric Psychiatry 1997
18. Unlike pain, delirium is seen
Creates sense of fear and helplessness
Delirium causes caregiver distress
WHY TALK ABOUT IT?
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003; 11: 309 - 319
19. Delirium is common
Delirium is harmful
Delirium hurts relationships
Delirium conflicts with patient goals
Delirium causes caregiver distress
WHY TALK ABOUT IT?
21. Which is not a risk factor for delirium?
a) Age
b) Cognitive impairment
c) Gender
d) Opioid use
e) Constipation
22. Case: Paul
• Paul is 72 years old,
with Alzheimer’s
disease and lung cancer.
• Retired dentist, active
and “in charge”
• Now agitated,
combative, trying to get
out of bed
23. What patients are at risk?
Environ-
mental
change
Physical Sensory
function Deficits
Cognitive
status
Patient oral
habits intake
Other
Drugs medical
problems
24. rugs, drugs, drugs, dehydration
motion, encephalopathy, environmental change
ow oxygen, low hearing/seeing
nfection, intracerebral event or metastasis
etention (urine or stool)
ntake changes (malnutrition, dehydration), Immobility
remia, under treated pain
etabolic disease
WHAT CAUSES IT?
25. Which of the following medications can
cause delirium?
a) Lorazepam
b) Hyoscyamine
c) Dexamethasone
d) All of the above
e) None of the above
26. Opioids
Corticosteroids
Benzodiazepines
Anticholinergics
Diuretics
Tricyclics
Lithium
H2 Blockers
NSAIDs
Metoclopramide
Alcohol/drug use or withdrawal
WHAT CAUSES IT?
27. Diagnosis of exclusion
Delirium during the dying process
Signs of the dying process
Multiple causes, often irreversible
TERMINAL DELIRIUM
CAN IMPENDING DEATH CAUSE IT?
28. Case: Paul – is he at risk for delirium?
Predisposing factors
Possible precipitating factors
Dementia
Age Drug side effects?
Metastatic lung cancer Hypoxemia?
Immobility Infection?
Poor oral intake Constipation?
Poly-pharmacy Urinary retention?
Metabolic disorder?
Brain metastases?
Emotional distress?
29. General Assessment: Delirium
• Hospice diagnosis, co-morbidities
• Onset of mental status change
• Oral intake, urine output, bowel movements
• Recent medication history
• Review of systems:
fever, N/V, pain, dyspnea, cough, edema, dec
ubiti
• Alcohol or illicit drug use
• Falls, safety
• Emotional, spiritual distress
30. Assessment: Paul
• Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
• Severe Alzheimer’s disease
• More restless, combative in last 3 days
• Hand-fed small, pureed meals & thickened
liquids but minimal in 3 days
• Small amount dark urine, no BM in 1 week
31.
32. Assessment Tools: Delirium
• Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)
– 94-100% sensitive, 90-95% specific
– 10-15 minutes by trained interviewer
• SQiD (single question in delirium)
– “Do you think Paul has been more confused
lately?”
– 80% sensitive and 71% specific in oncology patient
33. Confusion Assessment Method
Feature 1: Acute Onset Obtained from a family member or nurse:
and Fluctuating Course • Is there evidence of an acute change in mental status from
the patient’s baseline?
• Did the (abnormal) behavior fluctuate during the day, that is,
tend to come and go, or increase and decrease in severity?
Feature 2: Inattention • Did the patient have difficulty focusing attention, for
example, being easily distractible, or having difficulty
keeping track of what was being said?
Feature 3: • Was the patient’s thinking disorganized or incoherent, such
Disorganized thinking as rambling or irrelevant conversation, unclear or illogical
flow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to
subject?
Feature 4: Altered • Overall, how would you rate this patient’s level of
Level of consciousness consciousness?
alert [normal]),
vigilant [hyperalert],
lethargic [drowsy, easily aroused],
stupor [difficult to arouse], or
coma [unarousable])
The diagnosis of delirium by CAM requires the presence of features 1 and 2 and either 3 or 4.
34. Diagnostic Approach to Delirium
• Delirium is a clinical, bedside diagnosis
• Careful, gentle approach to patient
• Appearance, vital signs
• Focused exam based on history
• Consider rectal exam, catheter
35. Paul’s assessment: Delirium
• Lethargic, frail, elderly man lying in hospital bed;
fidgeting of arms, legs; slow but persistent
attempts to sit up or slide between side rails;
quiet but anxious expression
• CAM: all features present
• Afebrile, BP 105/62, HR 95, RR 24
• Positive findings:
– MM dry;
– Foley catheter w/cloudy, dark urine;
– abd distended but soft,
– quiet BS; rectal +stool;
– decubitus stable w/o infection
37. Paul’s follow up
Goals of care: Peaceful death at home • DNH • no needlesticks
Treated the treatable Treated the delirium
• Disimpaction, daily bowel • Haloperidol 0.5-1mg SL qHS
regimen and q8hrs prn
• Treated UTI w/ liquid • Calmer environment
antibiotics • Improved communication
• Weaned lorazepam
• Encouraged safe movement
In 2-3 days, Paul was back to baseline
46. Step 1: Treat underlying causes
Step 2: Non-pharmacological
Step 3: Pharmacological
Monitor: GIP or continuous care
Address family, caregivers and other
psychosocial impacts of delirium
Delirium
MANAGEMENT
47. Which of the following are appropriate
interventions for delirium?
a) Music during turns/personal care
b) Minimize ambient sound (alarms, bells, voice)
c) Aromatherapy such as Lavender or Melissa with bed bath
d) Spiritual interventions such as prayer, ritual, meditation
e) Cognitive behavioral therapy for PTSD
f) Engaging family or familiar people in care
g) All of the above
48. Assessing severity of agitation
Aggressive, hostile
Irritability, intimidation
Mood lability, loud
speech
Motor restlessness
Uncooperative, intense stare
Adapted from Scott Irwin, San Diego Hospice
49. Hierarchy of interventions for agitated delirium
Seclusion
Emergency and/or
medicine restraint
Voluntary
medication
Verbal intervention
Check for needs, Step 1: Treat underlying causes
non-pharmacologic Step 2: Non-pharmacological
Step 3: Pharmacological
Address family, caregivers and other
psychosocial impacts of delirium
Adapted from Scott Irwin, San Diego Hospice
51. Case 2: Rosie’s distress
• 88 yo great-grandmother with end-stage
pulmonary fibrosis, renal insufficiency.
• “CMO” and morphine drip was started to treat
her dyspnea – then sent home with hospice.
Please help! She is
moaning, agitated, in pain
even when we touch her
lightly. Other times, we can’t
wake her up.
52. rugs, drugs, drugs, dehydration
motion, encephalopathy, environmental change
ow oxygen, low hearing/seeing
nfection, intracerebral event or metastasis
etention (urine or stool)
ntake changes (malnutrition, dehydration), Immobility
remia, under treated pain
etabolic disease
STEP1: TREAT CAUSE Management
53. Opioid neurotoxicity: important cause
• Morphine metabolized in the liver to
– Morphine 6-glucoronide
– Morphine 3-glucoronide
• Builds up disproportionately in renal failure
• Neuro-agitation:
– Increased RR, agitation, myoclonus, and
sometimes seizures
Anti-psychotics may worsen opioid neurotoxicity:
benzodiazepines and phenobarbitol are treatments of choice
54. Rosie’s distress: treat underlying cause
Attempt to reverse morphine neurotoxicity
• Stop morphine
• Start lorazepam or phenobarbitol
• Consider IV/SQ fluids depending on goals of care
PRN SL oxycodone or IV fentanyl if needed for pain or
dyspnea or schedule methadone
Oxygen for hypoxemia-induced delirium
STEP1: TREAT CAUSE Management
55. Treat the pain
Address sleep-wake cycle
Create familiar environment
Facilitate range of motion & exercise
AGITATION WITH DEMENTIA
58. NON-PHARMACOLOGIC APPROACH
• Engage social work • Engage chaplaincy
& psychology • Acknowledge
• Consider past faith, legacy, regret
trauma, Ψ history
Emotional Existential
Environment Physical
• Engage • Nurses, aides, and
aides, housekeeping doctors
, family. • Exquisite care of the
• Consider the 5 body
senses
59. Physical environment & body
Sight
• Light/dark cycles, visual cues, familiar faces
Sound
• Reduce ambient noise, music therapy, familiar voices
Smell
• Cleanliness, aromatherapy, home cooking
Touch
• Massage, physical therapy, movement
Taste
• Drink if thirsty – but hydrating drinks. Eat if hungry – and assure good bowels.
STEP2: NON-PHARM Management
60. Case 3: Mr. U
65 year old retired engineer with metastatic lung
cancer to bone.
HPI: Severe pain, principally in area of leg requiring
complex pain management. Now he is experiencing
increased confusion, agitation, restlessness at night.
Past Medical History: Generally healthy until diagnosis.
Social History: Married to a non-Catholic woman. Has 2
grown daughters. Raised Catholic but has not been to
church much since his marriage.
61. Case 3: Mr. U’s agitation
• Physical: under treated pain
• Emotional: sadness at losing his family
• Existential:
– Fear of afterlife
– Unresolved conflicts
– Never married in the Church
Created non-judgmental ritual, presence
Witnessing by hospice team and family
65. Hypoactive delirium
• Day-night cycle can be critical
• Methylphenidate 5mg qam and qnoon
– Watch for anxiety, symptomatic palpitations
STEP3: PHARMACOLOGIC Management
66. If all else fails, use antipsychotics
MANAGING DELIRIUM
67. Antipsychotics are the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment
Black Box Warning!
But they increase death!
Increased risk by 1.6 – 1.7 RR
absolute increase from 2.3% to 3.5% during intervention
Risk / benefit and goals of care
Time
STEP3: PHARMACOLOGIC Management
68. Treat like other breakthrough symptoms:
Schedule medicine based on t ½
Breakthrough medicines based on Cmax
Consider selection of antipsychotic based on profile
STEP3: PHARMACOLOGIC Management
69. Pharmacology of Anti-psychotics
Drug Cmax T½
Chlorpromazine 1-4 hours 16-30 hours
25mg SQ/IV/PR q3 hours prn
up to 2g/day
Quetiapine 1-2 hours 6-7 hours
25-100mg PO q1 hour prn
up to 1200 mg/day
Risperidone 1-1.5 hours 3-24 hours
0.25-1mg PO q1 hour
up to 6mg/d
Olanzapine 4-6 hours 20-70 hours
5-10mg PO q4 hours prn
up to 30mg/day
Haloperidol 30 min – 1 hour 4-6 hours
0.5 – 2 mg q1 hr prn
71. Chlorpromazine vs. Haloperidol
Antipsychotic Agent Chlorpromazine Haloperidol
Sedation +++ +
EPS ++ ++++
Anticholinergic ++ +
Orthostatic
Hypotension
+++ +
++++ = very high incidence, +++ = high incidence, ++ = moderate incidence, + = low incidence
Drug Facts and Comparisons (Oct 2003)
72. More on Anti-psychotics
Length of Sed Sed - EPS
use
Haloperidol Chlorpromazine
3-7 Days 0.5-2 mg q1 hour prn 12.5-25 mg q 3
IM, IV, SC hours prn up to 3
PO (tab/sol) grams/day
SCI IM, IV, PR
SCI?
PO - erratic
Risperidone Olanzapine Quetiapine
>7 Days (Risperdal) (Zyprexa) (Seroquel)
PO: tab,sol,odt PO: tab,odt PO: tab
IM: long acting IM: intermittent Ziprasidone
(Geodon)
PO: cap
IM: intermittent
73. Choose based on level of behavior
If more hyperactive, consider atypical antipsychotics
If more hypoactive, consider haloperidol
Titrate medication if initial dose is not effective.
Consider switching medication if:
Lengthy treatment anticipated
Lack of response despite increase dose.
74. Inadequate or no response:
Reassess cause again, depending on goals of care.
Consider sedation if needed.
benzodiazepines, barbiturates or propofol
This is palliative sedation!
75. Agitated delirium - severe
For imminent risk of harm to self or others due to agitation,
mix in following order:
Haloperidol 2- Diphenhydramine
Lorazepam 1-2mg
5mg 50-100mg
76. Agitated delirium – severe
(alternatives)
• Chlorpromazine 50-100mg SQ/PR up to 2g/day
– Increase dose by 25-50mg q1-4 hours until controlled
– Likely to not need diphenhydramine
– Consider lorazepam along side
• Olanzapine 5-10mg IM q4 hours up to 30mg/day
• Phenobarbitol 20-40mg starting dose q3 hours prn
– especially useful for brain mets.
77. Hierarchy of interventions for agitated delirium
Seclusion
Emergency and/or
medicine restraint
Voluntary
medication
Verbal intervention
Check for Step 1: Treat underlying causes
needs, non- Step 2: Non-pharmacological
pharmacologic Step 3: Pharmacological
Address family, caregivers and other
psychosocial impacts of delirium
Adapted from Scott Irwin, San Diego Hospice
78. Case 4: Philip’s struggle
63 yo retired photographer with end-stage CHF, in
the context of drug abuse history. He was an
active duty veteran.
He was estranged from his family and no longer
active in his Jewish faith.
Severe dyspnea. Now over 2 weeks becoming
increasingly confused multiple times each day.
Sometimes confusion is agitated, sometimes
somnolent.
79. Philip’s struggle
“Philip has terminal agitation, and I think he
needs more …?”
– Is it terminal agitation, or something else?
– How can you find out?
Based on what we’ve talked about this far:
What would your next step be?
80. Philip’s medications
MSContin and Roxinol for dyspnea
Oxygen
Lorazepam q4 hours prn for anxiety
Furosemide qDay for edema
Metoprolol bid for CHF
Lisinopril for CHF
81. Addressing Philip’s DELIRIUM
Step 1: reverse the reversible
Opioids rotated Step 2: Non-pharmacologic
Benzos weaned
Social worker addressed Step 3: Psychopharm
Assessment for UTI – PTSD
negative
Chaplain was involved Hyperactive periods less
Poor intense BUT
hydration/nutrition –
not reversed due to Mental status continued
goals of care to wax and wane
Oxygen increased Haloperidol was started
82. Philip’s
struggle
With these interventions, he awoke
with more alertness for a brief a
few days.
Later he showed signs of active
dying:
Mottling of hands and feet
Irregular breathing patterns
He died peacefully 7 days later. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/USAF_photographer.jpg
83. Tending to delirium
takes a community
volunteers family &
friends
hospice
chaplain caregivers
nursing home
caregivers
88. Prevent it • know the risks
Recognize it • assess often
Reverse it • reverse the reversible
Treat it • non-pharmacologic • antipsychotic • sedatives
CONFRONTING DELIRIUM
90. Which are you most likely to use today?
a) Recognize the difference between agitation and delirium
b) Use specific tools for assessment (CAM, SQiD)
c) Engage all members of the IDT earlier
d) Remember the non-pharmacologic interventions
e) Know my pharmacology
Editor's Notes
B- is the correct answer
Disturbance in consciousness with reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attentionA change in cognition or the development of a perceptual disturbance that is not better accounted for by a preexisting, established or evolving dementiaDevelops over a short period of time (usually hours to days) and tends to fluctuate over the course of the dayThere is evidence from the history, physical exam, or laboratory findings that the disturbance is caused by the direct physiological consequences of a general medical condition
d
Greater than > 70 % of seriously ill patients rate mental awareness as important JAMA 2000; 284: 2476 - 248289% of seriously ill patients would not choose a treatment if the outcome is cognitive impairment; the more risk the less inclined to treatment NEJM 2002; 346: 1061 - 1090
76% witnessed delirium or confusion38% witnessed these symptoms dailySense of fear and helplessnessMay contribute to caregiver risk for Major Depressive Disorder and quality of life impairments (in aggregate with prevalence and frequency of other distressing events) Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003; 11: 309 - 319Most caregiver measures center on the consequence of care provision for the caregiver’s well being and function. This study measured the impact of caregiver exposure to distress of their loved ones. Delirium the second most prevalent symptom after severe pain (80%)Sense of helplessness (between 1 = somewhat and 2 = very) 1.22 on scaleFear 0.79 (0= none 1 = somewhat)
c
Causes of Delirium Acronym (adapted from Capital Health)D Drugs, drugs, drugs, dehydration, depression E Electrolyte, endocrine dysfunction (thyroid, adrenal), ETOH (alcohol) and/or drug use, abuse or withdrawal L Liver failure I Infection (urinary tract infection, pneumonia, sepsis) R Respiratory problems (hypoxia), retention of urine or stool (constipation) I Increased intracranial pressure; U Uremia (renal failure), under treated pain M Metabolic disease, metastasis to brain, medication errors/omissions, malnutrition (thiamine, folate or B12 deficiency)
What are the benefits and burdens of:Labs, tests to search for reversible causes of delirium?CBC, lytes, BUN/creat, calcium, glucose, UA, O2 satTreatments of underlying cause(s)?Antibiotics, oxygen, bladder catheter, otherTreatments of agitated behavior?Antipsychotics, sedative hypnoticsChange in setting of care
TARGETED RISK FACTOR AND ELIGIBLE PATIENTS STANDARDIZED INTERVENTION PROTOCOLSTARGETED OUTCOMEFOR REASSESSMENTCognitive impairment*All patients, protocol once daily; patients with base-line MMSE score of <20 or orientation score of <8, protocol three times dailyOrientation protocol: board with names of care-team members and day’s schedule; communication to reorient to surroundings Therapeutic-activities protocol: cognitively stimulating activities three times daily (e.g., discussion of current events, structured reminiscence, or word games)Change in orientation scoreSleep deprivationAll patients; need for protocol assessedonce dailyNon-pharmacologic sleep protocol: at bedtime, warm drink (milk or herbal tea), relaxation tapes or music, and back massageSleep-enhancement protocol: unit-wide noise-reduction strategies (e.g., silent pill crushers, vibrating beepers, and quiet hallways) and schedule adjustments to allow sleep (e.g., rescheduling of medications and procedures)Change in rate of use ofsedative drug for sleep†ImmobilityAll patients; ambulation whenever possible, and range-of-motion exercises when patients chronically non-ambulatory, bed or wheelchair bound, immobilized (e.g., because of an extremity fracture or deep venous thrombosis), or when prescribed bed restEarly-mobilization protocol: ambulation or active range-of-motion exercises three times daily; minimal use of immobilizing equipment (e.g., bladder catheters or physical restraints)Change in Activities of Daily Living scoreVisual impairmentPatients with <20/70 visual acuity on binocular near-vision testingVision protocol: visual aids (e.g., glasses or magnifying lenses) and adaptive equipment (e.g., large illuminated telephone keypads, large-print books, and fluorescent tape on call bell), with daily reinforcement of their useEarly correction of vision, «48 hr after admissionHearing impairmentPatients hearing «6 of 12 whispers onWhisper TestHearing protocol: portable amplifying devices, earwax disimpaction, and special communication techniques, with daily reinforcement of these adaptationsChange in Whisper Test scoreDehydrationPatients with ratio of blood urea nitrogen to creatinine»18, screened for protocol by geriatric nurse-specialistDehydration protocol: early recognition of dehydration and volume repletion (i.e., encouragement of oral intake of fluids)Change in ratio of blood urea nitrogen to creatinine
If patient does not fully respond to treatmentReevaluatediagnosis/presumed causeInquire about adherence to medicationConsider dosage adjustment Titrate before rotate - just like with pain!Consider a different medicationRefer to a specialist
BMJ 2011;343:d4065 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4065Efficacy of treating pain to reduce behavioural disturbances in residents of nursing homes with dementia: cluster randomised clinical trialBettina S Husebo postdoctoral fellow, Clive Ballard professor, Reidun Sandvik registered nurse, Odd Bjarte Nilsen statistician, Dag Aarsland professor AbstractObjective To determine whether a systematic approach to the treatmentof pain can reduce agitation in people with moderate to severe dementialiving in nursing homes.Design Cluster randomised controlled trial.Setting 60 clusters (single independent nursing home units) in 18 nursinghomes within five municipalities of western Norway.Participants 352 residents with moderate to severe dementia andclinically significant behavioural disturbances randomised to a stepwiseprotocol for the treatment of pain for eight weeks with additional follow-upfour weeks after the end of treatment (33 clusters; n=175) or to usualtreatment (control, 27 clusters; n=177).Intervention Participants in the intervention group received individualdaily treatment of pain for eight weeks according to the stepwise protocol,with paracetamol (acetaminophen), morphine, buprenorphine transdermalpatch, or pregabaline. The control group received usual treatment andcare.Main outcome measures Primary outcome measure was agitation(scores on Cohen-Mansfield agitation inventory). Secondary outcomemeasures were aggression (scores on neuropsychiatric inventory-nursinghome version), pain (scores onmobilisation-observation-behaviour-intensity-dementia-2), activities ofdaily living, and cognition (mini-mental state examination).Results Agitation was significantly reduced in the intervention groupcompared with control group after eight weeks (repeated measuresanalysis of covariance adjusting for baseline score, P<0.001): theaverage reduction in scores for agitation was 17% (treatment effectestimate −7.0, 95% confidence interval −3.7 to −10.3). Treatment of painwas also significantly beneficial for the overall severity of neuropsychiatricsymptoms (−9.0, −5.5 to −12.6) and pain (−1.3, −0.8 to −1.7), but thegroups did not differ significantly for activities of daily living or cognition.
Aromatherapy massage RCT showed short-term benefit in anxiety in patients with cancer related anxiety.Lavandula augustifolia (Lavender) aromatherapy - agitation in elderly patients with dementia. Cross-over randomized study. N=70Improvement in Agitation (p<0.0005), irritability (p<0.001), physical aggression, physical behavior non-aggressive, and verbally agitated behavior (p<0.001).Other studies showed cutaneous application of oil for effect, given decrease in olfactory function in elderly.