The document evaluates several sources of information about Real Madrid vs Barcelona football matches. It assesses whether each source is reliable by considering factors like the author, date, aim of the source, and whether searches verify the author and details. One website from 2008 is deemed reliable as it has a real reporter and up-to-date information, but lacks reference links. Another website is deemed unreliable as it has no named author and biased information that does not match other sources. The document emphasizes verifying sources through searches and cross-checking details and aims.
Evaluating sources of information about Real Madrid vs Barcelona football matches
1. Information Where I got it Search Term Is this Source Reliable?
Source from (URL) (What you
(what is it?) typed into the
Search
Engine)
Yes (give reasons) No (give reasons)
http://huff.to/JfhNfS Real Madrid It was posted on 21st of April, The
Website Barcelona + author did exist when I searched on
2012 Google. Its aim is to to us about the
football game and it did achieve its
aim
Vietweek It was printed out on May 4th and
Newspaper there’s an author’s name there and it
does have a very clear aim and the
newspaper described it pretty well
http://bbc.in/IcU0fe Madrid beat The story was written by David
Website Barcelona BBC Ornstein and when I searched it in
Google, I found out that he did work
for BBC sport news. The news was
written on 21 April so it’s up-to-date.
The aim of the site is very clear and
simple: Barcelona 1-2 Real Madrid.
The author described the game
clearly enough that people could
understand what happened
2. Website http://bit.ly/JdYT93 Real Madrid There was a real guy reporting about
beat this. It was up-to-date. The aim of the
Barcelona - site was clear but there is no
2008 reference links or any links to other
websites. I think it’s pretty useful for
me when I write the newspaper
http://bit.ly/JvQ3C8 ‘Real Madrid There wasn’t the name of the author
website Barcelona’ anywhere, there are links but it’s all
league 2012 about other stories. The aim of the
page was clear but I don’t think it
achieved its aim because most of it
talked about what people have said
about that game and about the place
of the team in the league. I think the
information is biased because when I
compare the information of this
website to another one, Real Madrid
seems to play much better on this
one. It’s no use for me when I write
the newspaper.