a research paper about super ring circumcision device

1. RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012
www.PosterPresentations.com
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2019
www.PosterPresentations.com
The common complications of Plastibell
are slippage, migration, bleeding and
serious infection. We investigated the
performance of Magic Ring (a modified
Plastibell device) for circumcision in
children to reduce its risk of
complication.
Introduction
This was a retrospective study of 52 children circumcised in Muslimat Public Hospital,
Ponorogo. They had a modified Plastibell circumcision designed to reduce risk of
complications of standard Plastibell devices (slippage, migration, bleeding, secondary
infection, and pain from trapped frenulum). Some modifications were made such as
deeper canal to ensure faster drop-off interval, ligation by surgical thread around the
canal to reduce bleeding risk and secondary infection, and upsizing the device 2-4mm
above the glan’s diameter to prevent slippage and migration. Patients were followed up
everyday up to 8 weeks after the procedure. Outcome measures were evaluated such as
slippage & migration rate, bleeding rate, infection rate, and pain scale
Materials and Method
Circumcision using the Modified Plastibell Device reduced the overall complication rate to
1,9 % including a case of postoperative bleeding caused by excessive physical activity,
compared to our previous data. There were no cases of migration and slippage reported.
No patient experienced infection and moderate to severe pain. All enrolled patients were
satisfied with the postoperative outcome.
Resulit
Conclusion
It might come as a solution to reduce risks
associated with standard Plastibell usage in
circumcision patients as it shows lower bleeding,
slippage, and migration rate and better pain
scale.
References
• World Health Organization (2010). Manual for early infant male circumcision under local
anaesthesia. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
• World Health Organization (2012). Framework for clinical evaluation of devices for male
circumcision. WHO Press.
• Indonesian Medical Council (2012). Standar Kompetensi Dokter Indonesia. Indonesian
Medical Council.
• Hammed A, Helal AA, Badway R, Goda SH, Yehya A, Razik MA, et al. Ten years
experience with a novel modification of plastibell circumcision. Afr J Paediatr Surg
2014;11:179-83.
• Mavhu W, Larke N, Hatzold K, Ncube G, Weiss HA, Mangenah C, et al. Safety,
acceptability, and feasibility of early infant male circumcision conducted by nurse-
midwives using the AccuCirc device: results of a field study in Zimbabwe. Glob Health Sci
Pract. 2016; 4 Suppl 1:S42-S54. http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00199
• Jiang M. et al.: Clinical trial of a circumcision device. Med Sci Monit, 2014; 20: 454-462
• Ravisankar G. Pillai & Ziad Al Naieb (2015) Plastibell circumcision supported by a
calcium-alginate fibre dressing to reduce bleeding, Arab Journal of Urology, 13:3, 179-
181, DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.04.001
• Brian J. Morris and Chris Eley (2011). Male Circumcision: An Appraisal of Current
Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering - From Theory to Applications, Prof. Reza Fazel
(Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-637-9, InTech,
• Lazarus J, Alexander A, Rode H: Circumcision complications associated with the Plastibell
device. S Afr Med J. 2007; 97: 192-3.
• Sörensen SM, Sörensen MR: Circumcision with the Plastibell device. A long-term follow-
up. Int Urol Nephrol. 1988; 20: 159-66.
• Mousavi SA, Salehifar E: Circumcision Complications Associated with the Plastibell
Device and Conventional Dissection Surgery: A Trial of 586 Infants of Ages up to 12
Months. Adv Urol. 2008: 606123.
• Nguyen TT, et. Al : Avoidance of general anesthesia for circumcision in infants under 6
months of age using a modified Plastibell technique. Pediatric Surgery International
(2019) 35:619–623
• S. A. Mousavi, E. Salehifar2. (2008). Circumcision Complications Associated with the
Plastibell Device and Conventional Dissection Surgery: A Trial of 586 Infants of Ages up
to 12Months. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Urology Volume 2008.
• V. Palit, D. K. Menebh, I. Taylor, et al. (2007) A unique service in UK delivering Plastibell
circumcision: review of 9-year results. Pediatr Surg Int 3:45–48 DOI 10.1007/s00383-
006-1805-6
• B. M. Jimoh, I. S. Odunayo, I. Chinwe, et. al. (2016) Plastibell circumcision of 2,276 male
infants: a multi-centre study. Pan African Medical Journal,
Acknowledgement / Contact
• Lutfi Aulia Rahman, MD (+6285645892496)
• Riza Mazidu, MD (+6285655402544)
Lutfi A Rahman (1), Riza Mazidu (2)
(!) Muslimat Public Hospital, Ponorogo
Clinical Investigation of Magic Ring (Modified Plastibell Device) for Circumcision
Discussion
The Magic Ring had some modifications made from the original Plastibell such as deeper
canal to ensure faster drop-off interval, ligation by surgical thread around the canal to
reduce bleeding risk and secondary infection, and upsizing the device 2-4mm above the
glan’s diameter to prevent slippage and migration.