The document discusses a school play involving citizenship and the Big Bad Wolf. It mentions Terrace Ridge School and describes cleaning up after the play and applying makeup to the actors.
Rizogalo is a traditional Greek rice pudding dessert. It is made by simmering rice, milk, sugar and cinnamon together until thickened. The pudding is chilled and served, often with cinnamon sprinkled on top.
SpongeBob square pants is chosen because he enjoys doing silly activities with the other main characters. He loves to have fun and entertain his friends in Bikini Bottom through humor and hijinks.
The document discusses having nuggets with peas and carrots for dinner and preparing to have a conversation. It expresses gratitude and notes that the meal is finished.
The document discusses when it may be justified for a liberal democracy to temporarily suspend citizens' rights and freedoms. It argues that rights can be suspended during times of crisis when it is necessary to protect democratic principles and society, as long as it is only for a limited time, benefits all citizens, and the government makes responsible decisions. It provides the examples of Canada implementing the War Measures Act during World Wars and a separatist crisis as times when rights were justifiably suspended, while Nazi Germany's suspension of rights led to a loss of democracy.
The document discusses how countries have responded to economic crises throughout history, using examples from the Great Depression, World War 1 Germany, and Canada. It argues that embracing modern liberalism through policies like the New Deal is typically most effective for recovery, while temporarily rejecting some liberal principles may be necessary in extreme circumstances to protect the nation, but risks catastrophic outcomes if rights are not later restored.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze economic ideologies:
1. Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must provide social programs to prevent poverty and intervene occasionally in markets.
2. Source 2 criticizes socialism, arguing that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production and rejects government involvement in markets.
3. Source 3 portrays wealthy capitalists questioning an economic boom's benefits, relating to classical liberal values of competition and individualism in markets.
The sources address whether government should intervene in economies - Source 1 supports intervention while Sources 2 and 3 support minimal intervention and capitalism. All three relate to concepts of self-interest.
Adam Smith was a Scottish economist born in 1723. He is known as the father of modern economics and capitalism. After being educated at Oxford and Glasgow universities, Smith worked as a professor of logic and moral philosophy. His major works included The Theory of Moral Sentiments in 1759 and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776, which argued that free markets and division of labor were more effective than regulations. Smith believed that when each person pursued their own self-interest, it benefited society through an "invisible hand." His ideas influenced economic policies and theories of capitalism.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze economic ideologies:
1. Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must provide social programs to prevent poverty and intervene occasionally in markets.
2. Source 2 criticizes socialism, arguing that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production and rejects government involvement in markets.
3. Source 3 portrays wealthy capitalists questioning an economic boom's benefits, relating to classical liberal values of competition and individualism in markets.
The sources address whether government should intervene in economies - Source 1 supports intervention while Sources 2 and 3 support less intervention and allowing private markets to function.
Rizogalo is a traditional Greek rice pudding dessert. It is made by simmering rice, milk, sugar and cinnamon together until thickened. The pudding is chilled and served, often with cinnamon sprinkled on top.
SpongeBob square pants is chosen because he enjoys doing silly activities with the other main characters. He loves to have fun and entertain his friends in Bikini Bottom through humor and hijinks.
The document discusses having nuggets with peas and carrots for dinner and preparing to have a conversation. It expresses gratitude and notes that the meal is finished.
The document discusses when it may be justified for a liberal democracy to temporarily suspend citizens' rights and freedoms. It argues that rights can be suspended during times of crisis when it is necessary to protect democratic principles and society, as long as it is only for a limited time, benefits all citizens, and the government makes responsible decisions. It provides the examples of Canada implementing the War Measures Act during World Wars and a separatist crisis as times when rights were justifiably suspended, while Nazi Germany's suspension of rights led to a loss of democracy.
The document discusses how countries have responded to economic crises throughout history, using examples from the Great Depression, World War 1 Germany, and Canada. It argues that embracing modern liberalism through policies like the New Deal is typically most effective for recovery, while temporarily rejecting some liberal principles may be necessary in extreme circumstances to protect the nation, but risks catastrophic outcomes if rights are not later restored.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze economic ideologies:
1. Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must provide social programs to prevent poverty and intervene occasionally in markets.
2. Source 2 criticizes socialism, arguing that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production and rejects government involvement in markets.
3. Source 3 portrays wealthy capitalists questioning an economic boom's benefits, relating to classical liberal values of competition and individualism in markets.
The sources address whether government should intervene in economies - Source 1 supports intervention while Sources 2 and 3 support minimal intervention and capitalism. All three relate to concepts of self-interest.
Adam Smith was a Scottish economist born in 1723. He is known as the father of modern economics and capitalism. After being educated at Oxford and Glasgow universities, Smith worked as a professor of logic and moral philosophy. His major works included The Theory of Moral Sentiments in 1759 and An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776, which argued that free markets and division of labor were more effective than regulations. Smith believed that when each person pursued their own self-interest, it benefited society through an "invisible hand." His ideas influenced economic policies and theories of capitalism.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze economic ideologies:
1. Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must provide social programs to prevent poverty and intervene occasionally in markets.
2. Source 2 criticizes socialism, arguing that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production and rejects government involvement in markets.
3. Source 3 portrays wealthy capitalists questioning an economic boom's benefits, relating to classical liberal values of competition and individualism in markets.
The sources address whether government should intervene in economies - Source 1 supports intervention while Sources 2 and 3 support less intervention and allowing private markets to function.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze perspectives on government involvement in the economy and capitalism.
Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must provide social programs to prevent poverty and intervene occasionally in markets. Source 2 criticizes socialism and argues that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production. Source 3 questions whether economic booms truly benefit everyone if no individual succeeds.
The sources have differing views on whether classical liberalism allowing no government involvement or modern liberalism permitting some intervention is better aligned with principles of capitalism and individual pursuit of self-interest.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze perspectives on government involvement in the economy.
Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must fund social programs and intervene occasionally in markets to prevent poverty and ensure individuals can pursue happiness.
Source 2 criticizes socialism, arguing that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production, supporting minimal government involvement.
Source 3 depicts wealthy capitalists questioning an economic boom's importance if everyone benefits, including the poor, implying support for classical liberalism and capitalism based on competition and individualism.
This document contains a bibliography with 15 sources cited in APA format, including books, websites, news sites, educational resources, and government/international organization sites. The sources are listed alphabetically and include pertinent publication information such as author, title, publisher, date, and URL for websites. The bibliography provides references for research on humanities, history, literature, grammar, and global topics.
Team emma ashleigh hannah ashlyn delwyn vriendhmoulds
This case summarizes the Supreme Court of Canada case involving Delwyn Vriend who was fired from his job for being gay and sued the provincial government for not protecting sexual orientation in human rights legislation. The case balanced individual rights to sue versus changing legislation to protect the collective gay community. While the government was willing to give Vriend his job back, it was not willing to alter the definition of discrimination in law. The case helped broaden acceptance of gays and lesbians in Canada.
The document summarizes the ideas of several thinkers from the 18th and 19th centuries and how they relate to classical liberalism. Hobbes believed humans are selfish and would give up rights to a ruler for protection, with the ability to overthrow if unprotected. Locke focused on natural rights like life, liberty, and property. Montesquieu advocated for separation of government powers. Smith believed free markets and limited government would benefit society through self-interest. Mill emphasized individual rights and freedoms limited to preventing harm. Ricardo said wages should be set by supply and demand. Dickens wanted to expose poor working conditions. The document analyzes how each thinker contributed ideas around individual rights, limited government, and economic freedom
The document summarizes key aspects of liberalism and rejections of liberalism through history. It discusses the philosophies of classical liberal thinkers like John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx. It then analyzes circumstances in Germany and Russia that made communism and fascism appealing rejections of liberalism, including economic turmoil after WWI in Germany and oppression under the Tsar in Russia. The document considers elements of these rejections that could still be considered liberal and debates how justified the rejections were given the circumstances. It concludes by comparing the past rejections to the contemporary rejection of liberalism by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
The document discusses several attempts by Western nations to impose principles of modern liberalism such as human rights, labor standards, unions, and welfare states on non-liberal societies with mixed results. It provides Vietnam in the 1950s-70s as an example where the United States unsuccessfully tried to implement principles like rule of law, private property rights, welfare programs, and democratic elections. The imposition of these principles failed to take hold in Vietnam's political and economic systems due to factors like corruption and an unreceptive population, and the war resulted in millions of deaths across Indochina and thousands of American soldiers.
The document discusses the rejection of liberalism in Russia and Germany in the early 20th century. In Russia, the oppressive czarist system and free market inequality led to widespread desperation, allowing the Bolsheviks under Lenin to establish communism through violent revolution with popular support. In Germany, the humiliation of defeat in WWI, the economic devastation of the Great Depression, and years of instability weakened faith in democracy and liberalism, enabling Hitler and the Nazis to capitalize on fear and unemployment by offering a stronger nationalist government. Desperation played a major role in citizens turning away from liberalism in both countries.
John Stuart Mill believed in individual rights and freedoms, including freedom of speech, with the only limitation being actions that could harm others. He lived in an era where these ideas were considered radical. Pierre Elliot Trudeau also supported individual rights and freedoms, including for Aboriginal peoples and in terms of privacy in people's personal lives. John Locke believed that power comes from within individuals rather than from God, and that government should protect life, liberty and property to optimize human flourishing. John Maynard Keynes developed the idea that government should spend more during economic booms and less during recessions to lessen the economic impact.
The document provides information about several Southeast Asian countries including their geography, demographics, economies, and political leadership. It compares statistics like GDP per capita, population size, life expectancy, and exports/imports of countries like Indonesia, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Malaysia. It also summarizes two news articles about recent earthquakes in Indonesia and historical tensions between Indonesia and Malaysia.
Classical liberalism promotes individual rights and limited government. Over time, opposing ideologies developed that disagreed with classical liberalism's emphasis on individualism and laissez-faire economics. These new ideologies believed the government should play a more active role in reducing inequality and promoting the collective good of society.
The document discusses three sources that present different views on the role of government in the economy. Source 1 supports Keynesian economics and modern liberalism, arguing that government should fund social programs to prevent poverty. Source 2 criticizes socialism and argues that hierarchical systems and private industry, not government intervention, are what produce goods. Source 3 mocks the idea that all benefit from economic booms, aligning with laissez-faire capitalism and individualism over government involvement or helping the poor. The sources debate whether complete capitalism or some government intervention best allows for individual pursuit of self-interest and economic stability.
To what extent should we embrace modern liberalismhmoulds
This document discusses Modern Liberalism and Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal policies during the Great Depression. It analyzes Roosevelt's understanding of Modern Liberalism, which promoted the welfare state with government organizations to improve citizens' living conditions, as well as welfare capitalism with employer-provided social benefits. Additionally, Modern Liberalism expanded human rights protections to apply to all people regardless of social class.
The document discusses how countries have responded to economic crises throughout history. It provides examples of both embracing modern liberalism as well as temporarily rejecting some liberal principles. The Great Depression is used as an example of how Franklin D. Roosevelt successfully fought the crisis by implementing New Deal programs and Keynesian economic policies, embracing modern liberalism. In contrast, Germany after WWI desperately rejected liberalism under Hitler, which ultimately failed and led to catastrophe. The document argues that rejecting liberalism can work temporarily in a crisis but should not become permanent, and modern liberalism is generally the best approach for long-term stability and growth.
Source One represents a collectivist ideology through the Inuit people sharing their food equally despite having varying amounts. This prioritizes community well-being over individual goals. Source Two depicts an individualist perspective through a man focusing on his self-interest in telling a begging bear it should work instead of ask for help, reflecting classical liberalism. Both sources relate to liberalism principles, with Source One blending collectivism and welfare capitalism and Source Two exemplifying individualism and self-interest. They demonstrate different ideological approaches and how societies transition between them.
The document provides definitions and explanations of over 100 social, political, and economic terms related to issues in liberalism and resistance to liberalism. It covers terminology around identity, individualism, ideology, economics, government philosophies, and movements throughout history such as progressivism, conservatism, socialism, feminism, and more.
A teacher and secretary discuss a student who flooded the bathroom floor at school. The teacher argues that if the flooding was unintentional, the student should not be punished severely. However, the secretary implies the student received only a suspension rather than expulsion because her parents are wealthy. They agree it is unfair that rich students face less consequences for rule-breaking.
A teacher and secretary discuss a student who flooded the bathroom floor at school. The teacher argues that if the flooding was unintentional, the student should not be punished severely. However, the secretary implies the student received only a suspension rather than expulsion because her parents are wealthy. They agree it is unfair that rich students face less consequences for rule breaking.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze perspectives on government involvement in the economy and capitalism.
Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must provide social programs to prevent poverty and intervene occasionally in markets. Source 2 criticizes socialism and argues that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production. Source 3 questions whether economic booms truly benefit everyone if no individual succeeds.
The sources have differing views on whether classical liberalism allowing no government involvement or modern liberalism permitting some intervention is better aligned with principles of capitalism and individual pursuit of self-interest.
The document discusses three different sources that analyze perspectives on government involvement in the economy.
Source 1 supports modern liberalism and Keynesian economics, arguing that government must fund social programs and intervene occasionally in markets to prevent poverty and ensure individuals can pursue happiness.
Source 2 criticizes socialism, arguing that hierarchical systems and human labor are necessary for production, supporting minimal government involvement.
Source 3 depicts wealthy capitalists questioning an economic boom's importance if everyone benefits, including the poor, implying support for classical liberalism and capitalism based on competition and individualism.
This document contains a bibliography with 15 sources cited in APA format, including books, websites, news sites, educational resources, and government/international organization sites. The sources are listed alphabetically and include pertinent publication information such as author, title, publisher, date, and URL for websites. The bibliography provides references for research on humanities, history, literature, grammar, and global topics.
Team emma ashleigh hannah ashlyn delwyn vriendhmoulds
This case summarizes the Supreme Court of Canada case involving Delwyn Vriend who was fired from his job for being gay and sued the provincial government for not protecting sexual orientation in human rights legislation. The case balanced individual rights to sue versus changing legislation to protect the collective gay community. While the government was willing to give Vriend his job back, it was not willing to alter the definition of discrimination in law. The case helped broaden acceptance of gays and lesbians in Canada.
The document summarizes the ideas of several thinkers from the 18th and 19th centuries and how they relate to classical liberalism. Hobbes believed humans are selfish and would give up rights to a ruler for protection, with the ability to overthrow if unprotected. Locke focused on natural rights like life, liberty, and property. Montesquieu advocated for separation of government powers. Smith believed free markets and limited government would benefit society through self-interest. Mill emphasized individual rights and freedoms limited to preventing harm. Ricardo said wages should be set by supply and demand. Dickens wanted to expose poor working conditions. The document analyzes how each thinker contributed ideas around individual rights, limited government, and economic freedom
The document summarizes key aspects of liberalism and rejections of liberalism through history. It discusses the philosophies of classical liberal thinkers like John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx. It then analyzes circumstances in Germany and Russia that made communism and fascism appealing rejections of liberalism, including economic turmoil after WWI in Germany and oppression under the Tsar in Russia. The document considers elements of these rejections that could still be considered liberal and debates how justified the rejections were given the circumstances. It concludes by comparing the past rejections to the contemporary rejection of liberalism by the Taliban in Afghanistan.
The document discusses several attempts by Western nations to impose principles of modern liberalism such as human rights, labor standards, unions, and welfare states on non-liberal societies with mixed results. It provides Vietnam in the 1950s-70s as an example where the United States unsuccessfully tried to implement principles like rule of law, private property rights, welfare programs, and democratic elections. The imposition of these principles failed to take hold in Vietnam's political and economic systems due to factors like corruption and an unreceptive population, and the war resulted in millions of deaths across Indochina and thousands of American soldiers.
The document discusses the rejection of liberalism in Russia and Germany in the early 20th century. In Russia, the oppressive czarist system and free market inequality led to widespread desperation, allowing the Bolsheviks under Lenin to establish communism through violent revolution with popular support. In Germany, the humiliation of defeat in WWI, the economic devastation of the Great Depression, and years of instability weakened faith in democracy and liberalism, enabling Hitler and the Nazis to capitalize on fear and unemployment by offering a stronger nationalist government. Desperation played a major role in citizens turning away from liberalism in both countries.
John Stuart Mill believed in individual rights and freedoms, including freedom of speech, with the only limitation being actions that could harm others. He lived in an era where these ideas were considered radical. Pierre Elliot Trudeau also supported individual rights and freedoms, including for Aboriginal peoples and in terms of privacy in people's personal lives. John Locke believed that power comes from within individuals rather than from God, and that government should protect life, liberty and property to optimize human flourishing. John Maynard Keynes developed the idea that government should spend more during economic booms and less during recessions to lessen the economic impact.
The document provides information about several Southeast Asian countries including their geography, demographics, economies, and political leadership. It compares statistics like GDP per capita, population size, life expectancy, and exports/imports of countries like Indonesia, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, and Malaysia. It also summarizes two news articles about recent earthquakes in Indonesia and historical tensions between Indonesia and Malaysia.
Classical liberalism promotes individual rights and limited government. Over time, opposing ideologies developed that disagreed with classical liberalism's emphasis on individualism and laissez-faire economics. These new ideologies believed the government should play a more active role in reducing inequality and promoting the collective good of society.
The document discusses three sources that present different views on the role of government in the economy. Source 1 supports Keynesian economics and modern liberalism, arguing that government should fund social programs to prevent poverty. Source 2 criticizes socialism and argues that hierarchical systems and private industry, not government intervention, are what produce goods. Source 3 mocks the idea that all benefit from economic booms, aligning with laissez-faire capitalism and individualism over government involvement or helping the poor. The sources debate whether complete capitalism or some government intervention best allows for individual pursuit of self-interest and economic stability.
To what extent should we embrace modern liberalismhmoulds
This document discusses Modern Liberalism and Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal policies during the Great Depression. It analyzes Roosevelt's understanding of Modern Liberalism, which promoted the welfare state with government organizations to improve citizens' living conditions, as well as welfare capitalism with employer-provided social benefits. Additionally, Modern Liberalism expanded human rights protections to apply to all people regardless of social class.
The document discusses how countries have responded to economic crises throughout history. It provides examples of both embracing modern liberalism as well as temporarily rejecting some liberal principles. The Great Depression is used as an example of how Franklin D. Roosevelt successfully fought the crisis by implementing New Deal programs and Keynesian economic policies, embracing modern liberalism. In contrast, Germany after WWI desperately rejected liberalism under Hitler, which ultimately failed and led to catastrophe. The document argues that rejecting liberalism can work temporarily in a crisis but should not become permanent, and modern liberalism is generally the best approach for long-term stability and growth.
Source One represents a collectivist ideology through the Inuit people sharing their food equally despite having varying amounts. This prioritizes community well-being over individual goals. Source Two depicts an individualist perspective through a man focusing on his self-interest in telling a begging bear it should work instead of ask for help, reflecting classical liberalism. Both sources relate to liberalism principles, with Source One blending collectivism and welfare capitalism and Source Two exemplifying individualism and self-interest. They demonstrate different ideological approaches and how societies transition between them.
The document provides definitions and explanations of over 100 social, political, and economic terms related to issues in liberalism and resistance to liberalism. It covers terminology around identity, individualism, ideology, economics, government philosophies, and movements throughout history such as progressivism, conservatism, socialism, feminism, and more.
A teacher and secretary discuss a student who flooded the bathroom floor at school. The teacher argues that if the flooding was unintentional, the student should not be punished severely. However, the secretary implies the student received only a suspension rather than expulsion because her parents are wealthy. They agree it is unfair that rich students face less consequences for rule-breaking.
A teacher and secretary discuss a student who flooded the bathroom floor at school. The teacher argues that if the flooding was unintentional, the student should not be punished severely. However, the secretary implies the student received only a suspension rather than expulsion because her parents are wealthy. They agree it is unfair that rich students face less consequences for rule breaking.
1. Citizenship Big Bad Wolf Play Terrace Ridge School I was also responsible for cleaning up after everyone was ready to go! My job was to make sure all of the actors were getting their make-up done