The document discusses three studies comparing primary angioplasty versus fibrinolysis for heart attack patients. The first study randomized 395 patients to either angioplasty or treatment with streptokinase fibrinolysis. The second study randomized 1572 patients to angioplasty or treatment with alteplase fibrinolysis. The third study from 2011 examined how long angioplasty could be delayed after fibrinolysis treatment compared. The document concludes with a reference to the 2013 ESC-SEC guidelines for heart attack patients.

1. 1.Angioplastia primaria
vs fibrinolisis.
2. Impacto del retraso
en angioplastia vs
fibrinolisis.

2. TIEMPO DE REPERFUSION
De Luca et al. Circulation 2004; 109: 1223

3. TIEMPO DE REPERFUSION

4. ANGIOPLASTIA vs FIBRINOLISIS
395 IAMEST RANDOMIZADS A ICP VS FIBRINOLISIS (estreptokinasa)

5. ANGIOPLASTIA vs FIBRINOLISIS
Keeley et al. LANCET 2003; 361:9351

6. ANGIOPLASTIA vs FIBRINOLISIS

7. ANGIOPLASTIA vs FIBRINOLISIS
1572 IAMEST RANDOMIZADS A ICP VS FIBRINOLISIS (alteplase)

8. ¿CUANTO SE PUEDE
DEMORAR LA ANGIOPLASTIA
RESPECTO A LA FIBRINOLISIS?

9. ANGIOPLASTIA vs FIBRINOLISIS

10. ANGIOPLASTIA vs FIBRINOLISIS
Duane et al. CIRCULATION 2011; 124: 2512-21

11. GUIAS ESC-SEC IAMEST 2013