Case 1:16-cv-00138 Pernix Vs Actavis - Actavis' answers and affirmative defenses

•

0 likes•289 views

The document appears to be a court filing related to a case, as it contains a case number, document number, filing date, and page numbers. However, as the document only includes page headers and no other text, it is not possible to determine any other details about the case or the purpose of the filing from the content provided.

Law

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 1 of 37 PageID #: 1424

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 2 of 37 PageID #: 1425

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 3 of 37 PageID #: 1426

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 4 of 37 PageID #: 1427

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 5 of 37 PageID #: 1428

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 6 of 37 PageID #: 1429

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 7 of 37 PageID #: 1430

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 8 of 37 PageID #: 1431

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 9 of 37 PageID #: 1432

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 10 of 37 PageID #: 1433

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 11 of 37 PageID #: 1434

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 12 of 37 PageID #: 1435

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 13 of 37 PageID #: 1436

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 14 of 37 PageID #: 1437

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 15 of 37 PageID #: 1438

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 16 of 37 PageID #: 1439

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 17 of 37 PageID #: 1440

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 18 of 37 PageID #: 1441

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 19 of 37 PageID #: 1442

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 20 of 37 PageID #: 1443

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 21 of 37 PageID #: 1444

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 22 of 37 PageID #: 1445

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 23 of 37 PageID #: 1446

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 24 of 37 PageID #: 1447

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 25 of 37 PageID #: 1448

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 26 of 37 PageID #: 1449

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 27 of 37 PageID #: 1450

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 28 of 37 PageID #: 1451

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 29 of 37 PageID #: 1452

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 30 of 37 PageID #: 1453

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 31 of 37 PageID #: 1454

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 32 of 37 PageID #: 1455

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 33 of 37 PageID #: 1456

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 34 of 37 PageID #: 1457

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 35 of 37 PageID #: 1458

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 36 of 37 PageID #: 1459

Case 1:16-cv-00138-GMS Document 59 Filed 11/30/16 Page 37 of 37 PageID #: 1460

"On March 28, 2013, after a week of unlawful detention, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) 'determined that Alfaro has established a probative claim to U.S. citizenship.' In support of its conclusion, the OPLA cited the fact that all it took was a phone call to the Department of Vital Statistics in Texas, to verify the authenticity of the birth certificate, and a phone call to Ms. Alfaro's mother, to confirm that Ms. Alfaro was born in the United States.

Case 1:14-cv-01118 Recro Vs Actavis - Actavis' Conclusions of law

Andrew Cunningham

The document appears to be a court filing related to a case numbered 1:14-cv-01118-GMS. It consists of 40 numbered pages and references an order or ruling issued on November 14, 2016 related to the named parties and case issues. However, without more context around the specific case, details of the parties, issues or ruling referenced in the 40 pages cannot be determined from the document alone in only 3 sentences.

Oculus Jury Response

Anatoly Budko

Oculus jury response

Anatol Alizar

The document appears to be a court filing related to a civil case. It consists of 90 pages of legal documentation including references to case numbers, parties involved, dates and page numbers. However, without more context around the specific nature and details of the case, it is difficult to provide a high-level summary of the essential information and issues in only 1-3 sentences from this legal document.

Lawsuit against Bill 113

Honolulu Civil Beat

“Bill 113 will make it illegal to grow some genetically modified (GM) plants, including valuable food and feed crops and flowers. By prohibiting the use of these crops that have been deemed by the government and scientific experts to be perfectly safe, Bill 113 is a direct assault on our ‘right to farm’ and essentially criminalizes those who rely on the tools of modern biotechnology to foster productivity.” “United we stand, divided we fall” Background: Signed into law on December 5, 2013, Hawaii County enacted Bill 113, which imposes a county-wide ban on the development, propagation, cultivation, and open-air testing of most genetically engineered (GE) crops. Plaintiffs represent a broad cross-section of Hawaii Island farmers and related businesses that rely on GE crops, including disease-resistant papaya, as well as technology companies that develop, test, and commercialize valuable, new GE agricultural products. Farmers and Agriculture Associations are standing United; participating in this suit, which seeks to invalidate and enjoin the County of Hawaii from enforcing County Ordinance 13-121 (“Bill 113”). The suit alleges that the bill: 1) is preempted under federal law 2) is preempted under state law 3) violates the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution 4) presents a regulatory taking in violation of the HI Constitution

Monsanto Dow AgroSciences Lawsuit Against GMO Farming Moratorium

Honolulu Civil Beat

SEC vs former executives of Brixmor Property Group

Hindenburg Research

Application and Affidavit for a Search Warrant

Anatol Alizar

Judge Andrew Hanen-immigration memorandum opinion and order

Corsairmo Beltitane

This document appears to be a legal filing related to a case numbered 1:14-cv-00254. It consists of several exhibits filed with the court, including various documents related to the case such as affidavits, correspondence, and other court filings. However, without more context about the specific nature and details of the case, it is difficult to provide a high-level summary in 3 sentences or less about the essential information contained in this document.

Lake MCBH Complaint

Honolulu Civil Beat

Schuchardt Sues Bloomberg Law For Libel - Civil Complaint

ElliottSchuchardt

Https _ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=file0.0520138215246959

jamesmaredmond

Https _ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=file0.0520138215246959

jamesmaredmond

GreenHunter Resources Lawsuit Against 2 Former VPs and a Competitor

Marcellus Drilling News

Darren-Chaker-Bankruptcy-Fraud

Darren Chaker

Celestin et al_v_martelly_et_al__nyedce-18-07340__0093.0

Daniel Alouidor

ZapGo Letter of Intent

Hindenburg Research

The document outlines the terms of a settlement agreement between two parties to resolve legal claims. It specifies that one party will pay the other a confidential amount, and in return both parties will release each other from any current or future claims related to the described issues. They agree the settlement is a compromise and not an admission of liability. The document is signed by representatives of both parties.

Tsarnaev jury verdict exhibits-witnesses

AnonDownload

Securities and exchange_commission_v_spencer_et_al__nysdce-19-09070__0001.0

Hindenburg Research

Cleveland Police Report Regarding Tamela Eaton

40.1

40.2

recro vs actavis

The qualifications proposed by the parties are not material to determining infringement in this case. Infringement of the ’096 PatentC. 9. Claim 1 of the ’096 patent recites: 1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising: a plurality of extended release beads comprising a gelling agent and an active ingredient, wherein said gelling agent is present in an amount sufficient to impart a gelling effect to the composition when the composition is subjected to a physical stress. Case 1:14-cv-01118-GMS Document 131 Filed 11/14/16 Page 9 of 43 PageID #: 2696 4 10. Actavis’s ANDA products contain

17 1302 documents

Andrew Cunningham

This document provides a notice of docketing for an appeal filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The appeal is case number 17-1302, involving CardiAQ Valve Technologies v. Neovasc Inc. The notice lists critical dates for the appeal, including dates for entry of appearance, certificate of interest, docketing statement, requests for extensions of time, briefs, and scheduling conflicts for oral argument. It also provides contact information for the parties and clerks.

Similar to Case 1:16-cv-00138 Pernix Vs Actavis - Actavis' answers and affirmative defenses

Victor Rivera lawsuit

Honolulu Civil Beat

Telexfreedeclaration pruebas contra telexfree

Julio Cesar Silverio

Farmers File Federal Complaint against Hawaii County to Protect the Future of...

Lorie Farrell

Monsanto Dow AgroSciences Lawsuit Against GMO Farming Moratorium

Honolulu Civil Beat

SEC vs former executives of Brixmor Property Group

Hindenburg Research

Application and Affidavit for a Search Warrant

Anatol Alizar

Judge Andrew Hanen-immigration memorandum opinion and order

Corsairmo Beltitane

Lake MCBH Complaint

Honolulu Civil Beat

Schuchardt Sues Bloomberg Law For Libel - Civil Complaint

ElliottSchuchardt

Https _ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=file0.0520138215246959

jamesmaredmond

Https _ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=file0.0520138215246959

jamesmaredmond

GreenHunter Resources Lawsuit Against 2 Former VPs and a Competitor

Marcellus Drilling News

Darren-Chaker-Bankruptcy-Fraud

Darren Chaker

Celestin et al_v_martelly_et_al__nyedce-18-07340__0093.0

Daniel Alouidor

ZapGo Letter of Intent

Hindenburg Research

Tsarnaev jury verdict exhibits-witnesses

AnonDownload

Securities and exchange_commission_v_spencer_et_al__nysdce-19-09070__0001.0

Hindenburg Research

Cleveland Police Report Regarding Tamela Eaton

Dylan Hock

40.1

FRAUDSPOTTER

40.2

FRAUDSPOTTER

Similar to Case 1:16-cv-00138 Pernix Vs Actavis - Actavis' answers and affirmative defenses (20)

Victor Rivera lawsuit

Telexfreedeclaration pruebas contra telexfree

Farmers File Federal Complaint against Hawaii County to Protect the Future of...

Monsanto Dow AgroSciences Lawsuit Against GMO Farming Moratorium

SEC vs former executives of Brixmor Property Group

Application and Affidavit for a Search Warrant

Judge Andrew Hanen-immigration memorandum opinion and order

Lake MCBH Complaint

Schuchardt Sues Bloomberg Law For Libel - Civil Complaint

Https _ecf.cacb.uscourts.gov_cgi-bin_show_temp.pl_file=file0.0520138215246959

GreenHunter Resources Lawsuit Against 2 Former VPs and a Competitor

Darren-Chaker-Bankruptcy-Fraud

Celestin et al_v_martelly_et_al__nyedce-18-07340__0093.0

ZapGo Letter of Intent

Tsarnaev jury verdict exhibits-witnesses

Securities and exchange_commission_v_spencer_et_al__nysdce-19-09070__0001.0

Cleveland Police Report Regarding Tamela Eaton

40.1

40.2

More from Andrew Cunningham

recro vs actavis

Andrew Cunningham

17 1302 documents

Andrew Cunningham

Case 1:14-cv-12405-ADB Document 644

Andrew Cunningham

Chris Clark, the CFO of Neovasc Inc. and a director of Neovasc Tiara Inc., submitted a declaration in a patent infringement case between Cardiaq Valve Technologies and Neovasc. In the declaration, Clark stated that Neovasc entered an agreement to sell its tissue processing technology and facility to Boston Scientific for $75 million, and that Neovasc has budgeted financially to last through 18 months of anticipated further legal proceedings. Contingent on closing the Boston Scientific deal, Neovasc offered $40.6 million as a partial bond pending appeal in the case.

Recro Vs. Actavis - Recros findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Andrew Cunningham

This document contains Recro's proposed post-trial findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding its infringement suit against Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. Recro alleges that Actavis's generic versions of the extended-release hydrocodone product Zohydro ER infringe Recro's U.S. Patent Nos. 9,132,096 and 6,902,742. Specifically, Recro argues that Actavis's ethylcellulose-based coating is equivalent to the claimed polyacrylic coatings of the '096 patent, and that Actavis's active-ingredient containing pellets deliver hydrocodone in a pulsatile manner as required by the '742 patent. Recro seeks a finding that Actavis

Recro vs Actavis Case 1:14-cv-01118-GMS Appendix of Trial Evidence

Andrew Cunningham

This document is a joint appendix of trial evidence from a case between Recro Gainesville LLC and Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. It contains a list of 75 exhibits, including patents, study reports, test results, and other documents that were submitted as evidence during the trial. The exhibits relate to hydrocodone bitartrate extended release capsules and include Actavis's ANDA and product development reports as well as studies evaluating the pharmacokinetic properties and bioequivalence of Actavis's generic product compared to the branded drug.

Recro vs alvogen_case_conclusion Case 1:14-cv-01364

Andrew Cunningham

The parties stipulate to dismiss the case Recro Gainesville LLC v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. without prejudice. The dismissal is pursuant to Rules 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and without costs, disbursements, or attorneys' fees to any party. The stipulation also states that the dismissal shall not prohibit or restrict the defendant from maintaining or filing certifications for ANDA No. 206986 under relevant law nor prohibit or restrict the FDA from reviewing or approving that ANDA.

More from Andrew Cunningham (6)

recro vs actavis

17 1302 documents

Case 1:14-cv-12405-ADB Document 644

Recro Vs. Actavis - Recros findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Recro vs Actavis Case 1:14-cv-01118-GMS Appendix of Trial Evidence

Recro vs alvogen_case_conclusion Case 1:14-cv-01364

Recently uploaded

2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf

CIkumparan

Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem

azizurrahaman17

Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures

USDAReapgrants.com

Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers

HarpreetSaini48

在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样

osenwakm

学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。 1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700 【主营项目】一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费) 三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度) 如果您处于以下几种情况： ◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】 ◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到； ◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备； ◇回国时间很长，忘记办理； ◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看； ◇企事业单位必须要求办理的 ◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口 ◇申请留学生创业基金留信网认证的作用: 1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份 2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定 3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书 4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方 5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息 6:个人职称评审加20分 7:个人信誉贷款加10分 8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才

What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...

lawyersonia

Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024

EbizfilingIndia

V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf

bhavenpr

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।

Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...

Massimo Talia

This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.

From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments

ssusera97a2f

XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf

bhavenpr

Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...

Sangyun Lee

Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...

SKshi

Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers

RichardTheberge

Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx

ssuser559494

Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx

MasoudZamani13

Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation

seri bangash

"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation. Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil: Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable. Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable. Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity. Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable. Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.

Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976

PelayoGilbert

fnaf lore.pptx ...................................

20jcoello

Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...

Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain

Recently uploaded (20)

2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf

Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem

Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures

Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers

在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样

What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...

Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024

V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf

Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...

From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments

XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf

Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...

Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...

Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers

Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx

Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx

Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation

Ease of Paying Tax Law Republic Act 11976

fnaf lore.pptx ...................................

Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...