The document compares a 1987 Camaro and a 2010 Camaro, listing pros and cons of each. For the 1987 model, pros include being lighter and cheaper while cons are outdated technology, less fuel efficiency, and a smaller engine. Pros of the 2010 include more power, better fuel economy, and more passenger space, while cons are higher price and fuel consumption. The conclusion is that while the 1987 has a lower price, the 2010's modern technology gives it an edge overall.

1. Camaro Comparison
1987 Vs. 2010
By: Chris Barnett

2. 2010 Camaro
From user : Bull-Doser

3. 1987 Camaro
From user : aresauburn

4. Stat Sheet
Camaros

5. Pros and Cons of ’87 Camaro
Pros Cons
This car is 109 lbs. lighter 1987 so its not in
that the 2010 production anymore
Interior- 8 cubic feet smaller Less gas mileage by a few
miles
Engine is smaller by a half of
a liter Automatic- it shifts when it
wants to, not when you want
Price is way cheeper
to

6. Pros and cons of 2010 Camaro
Pros Cons.
6 speed manual Price is around 40 grand
transmission, shift at low
More passenger cubic ft.
rpms
Bigger motor- consume
2 mpg better in both areas
more fuel
Compact car- not big at all

7. Winner?
Althought the older Camaro management, it just creams
is more reasonable in price, the late eighty’s technology.
the new Camaro takes the
cake. It has a bigger motor,
but the fuel economy is just
slighty better. It also weighs
more and has more
passenger room, but with
todays technology in fuel