Ammonia (NH3) Mitigation Using Electrolyzed Water Spray Scrubber LPE Learning Center
Proceedings available at: http://www.extension.org/67656
The objective of this research was to evaluate electrolyzed water as a solution for a lab-scale spray scrubber for removing NH3 from air. A one-stage spray scrubber was fabricated to treat 50 cfm (1.42 m3/min) of introduced mixed NH3-air with an approximate NH3 concentration of 20 ppm. The mixed air was blown, countercurrent, to the 5-ft vertical scrubber body using a fan. Eight scrubber design variables were studied including contact times, nozzle types and scrubber solutions. Three contact times were 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 s. The two narrow and standard nozzles sprinkled in a full-cone spray pattern but at different angles of 26ᴼ and 52ᴼ, respectively. The scrubber solutions variables tested were reverse osmosis (RO) water and two types of electrolyzed water (50 ppm of total chlorine) with pH = 9.0 and pH = 6.5. The 18 combinations of treatments were tested in three replications and statistically analyzed to investigate the objective. The result showed that all of the experiments were able to mitigate the NH3, but at different efficiencies. The maximum efficiency of 53% was acquired with the narrow nozzle, 0.9s contact time and electrolyzed water with pH = 6.5. Therefore, it was concluded that increasing the contact time, decreasing the pH of electrolyzed water and using the narrow angle, higher flow rate nozzle increased the scrubber efficiency.
Ammonia (NH3) Mitigation Using Electrolyzed Water Spray Scrubber LPE Learning Center
Proceedings available at: http://www.extension.org/67656
The objective of this research was to evaluate electrolyzed water as a solution for a lab-scale spray scrubber for removing NH3 from air. A one-stage spray scrubber was fabricated to treat 50 cfm (1.42 m3/min) of introduced mixed NH3-air with an approximate NH3 concentration of 20 ppm. The mixed air was blown, countercurrent, to the 5-ft vertical scrubber body using a fan. Eight scrubber design variables were studied including contact times, nozzle types and scrubber solutions. Three contact times were 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 s. The two narrow and standard nozzles sprinkled in a full-cone spray pattern but at different angles of 26ᴼ and 52ᴼ, respectively. The scrubber solutions variables tested were reverse osmosis (RO) water and two types of electrolyzed water (50 ppm of total chlorine) with pH = 9.0 and pH = 6.5. The 18 combinations of treatments were tested in three replications and statistically analyzed to investigate the objective. The result showed that all of the experiments were able to mitigate the NH3, but at different efficiencies. The maximum efficiency of 53% was acquired with the narrow nozzle, 0.9s contact time and electrolyzed water with pH = 6.5. Therefore, it was concluded that increasing the contact time, decreasing the pH of electrolyzed water and using the narrow angle, higher flow rate nozzle increased the scrubber efficiency.
Project center in trichy @ieee 2016 titles for java and dotnetTripleN Infotech
IEEE Final Year Projects for M.E/M.TECH,B.E-CSE/IT from any domain & Technologies.For more detail contact:-DreamWeb TechnoSolutions@7200021403/04, 73/5 3rd floor,Kamatchi cmplx,Thillai nagar 1st cross,Trichy.
Project center in trichy @ieee 2016 titles for java and dotnetTripleN Infotech
IEEE Final Year Projects for M.E/M.TECH,B.E-CSE/IT from any domain & Technologies.For more detail contact:-DreamWeb TechnoSolutions@7200021403/04, 73/5 3rd floor,Kamatchi cmplx,Thillai nagar 1st cross,Trichy.
Calculamos el peso de un cuerpo en los planetas del sistema solar
1. CALCULAMOS EL PESO DE UN CUERPO EN LOS PLANETAS DEL SISTEMA
SOLAR
DE UN CUERPO DE 50 KILOGRAMOS
MERCURIO: F=……………………………….
VENUS: F=…………………………………….
TIERRA: F=……………………………………
MARTE: F=…………………………………...
JUPITER: F=…………………………………..
SATURNO: F=………………………………...
URANO: F=……………………………………
NEPTUNO: F=………………………………...