SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Bias in The Capital Punishment System
Group 8:
Alyssa Morgan
Daniel Valdez
David Poznansky
Hayden Lambert
Justin Rosenthal
Stats on Racial Bias
• From 1995 to 2000, federal prosecutors sought Death Penalty for 183
defendants; 74% were minorities.
• Of the 21 people on death row as of 2001, 81% were black or
Hispanic.
• Among black defendants found guilty of murdering a white person:
• 57.5% of defendants with "stereotypically black" features -- broad noses, thick lips, dark skin
and hair -- were sentenced to death.
• 24.4% of men who were rated as less stereotypically black were given the death sentence.
• Among black defendants found guilty of murdering a black person:
• 45% of the "stereotypically black" defendants were sentenced to death.
• "In 82% of the studies [reviewed], race of the victim was found to
influence the likelihood of being charged with capital murder or
receiving the death penalty, i.e., those who murdered whites were
found more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered
blacks.”
- United States General Accounting Office, Death Penalty Sentencing, February 1990
http://www.religioustolerance.org/executj.htm
RACE OF DEFENDANTS EXECUTED IN
THE U.S. SINCE 1976
BLACK: 425 people or 34.93%
LATINO: 91 people or 7.15%
WHITE: 692 people or 56.06%
OTHER: 25 people or1.85%
NOTE: The federal government counts
some categories, such as Hispanics, as
an ethnic group rather than a race.
DPIC refers to all groups as races
because the sources for much of our
information
use these categories.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/race-death-
row-inmates-executed-1976
RACE OF VICTIMS SINCE 1976
BLACK: 274 people or 14.51%
LATINO: 106 people or 5.41%
WHITE: 1394 people or 77.86%
OTHER: 47people or 2.22%
NOTE: Number of Victims refers to
the victims in the underlying murder
in cases where an execution has
occurred since the restoration of the
death penalty in 1976. There are
more victims than executions
because some cases involve more
than one victim
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/race-death-
row-inmates-executed-1976
CURRENT U.S. DEATH ROW
POPULATION BY RACE
BLACK: 1,351 people or 41.43%
LATINO: 383 people or 11.74%
WHITE: 1,448 people or 44.40%
OTHER: 79 people or 2.42%
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/race-death-
row-inmates-executed-1976
“How Prosecutors Fabricated the Case Against
Rodney Reed”
-ROBERT McDONALD
• In 1998 an African American male named Rodney
Reed is accused of murdering a 19 year old, white,
female named, Stacy Stites.
• Over ten years later, Rodney still sits on death row
awaiting his last appeal.
• He got a new hearing due to “allegations of
prosecutorial misconduct, suppressed evidence and
contrary eyewitness reports that have simmered
away for years” (McDonald).
http://www.counterpunch.org/mcdonald04062006.html
What is wrong with this picture?
• He is a black male, accused of killing a white female.
• The female was engaged to an officer of Bastrop County.
• Witnesses and some evidence were never presented in
court.
• The judge of his appeal hearing was the daughter of the
original judge who convicted him.
• The lead investigator in the case, Ed Salmela (and also a
friend of Jimmy Fennel, her fiancé) committed suicide
during the middle of their case.
• Their apartment was never investigated, even though it
was the last place Stites was known to be before she
died.
• The truck was given back to Fennel, even though bodily
fluids were found on the passenger side.
8
Defense Attorneys• Serving as a court-appointed attorney
is an initiation to “real” legal work.
• “I was more or less dragged, kicking
and screaming, into working on the
death penalty.”
• “My arrangement with the law firm
enabled me to spend a substantial
amount of my time doing free legal
work for poor people” (Tabak).
• “some sleep during the trial, and some
even fail to call a single witness in their
client’s defense” (Applegate).
• AND, some never object during at trial
Bias Juries
• Jury Selection- 5% of accused
offenders face trial by jury.
• Prosecution and defense try to
“find a jury competent to try”
the accused.
• Allen Snyder “prides himself
on achieving a death penalty
verdict against as many
defendants as possible,
prevented blacks from
participating in the jury” (Falk).
10
Capital Jury Project
• Jurors tend to make decisions about the appropriate
sentence prematurely.
• Jurors were selected in such a way that those inclined to
impose the death sentence were overrepresented.
• Jurors did not understand the instructions on how to decide
whether the capital sentence was appropriate.
• Juries frequently believed that the law required the death
sentence.
• Jurors largely felt that the choice of punishment was out of
their hands.
• Both the racial composition of the jury and the race of
individual jurors influence capital decision.
• Jurors tend to underestimate the severity of non-death
alternative punishments.
11
Bias Judges• State Judges face re-election,
therefore they are seeking to gain
many guilty verdicts to look
“successful” and “tough on crime”
• Judges who hear appeal cases “serve
as important rectifiers of injustices
perpetrated by prosecutors or
resulting from false eyewitness
identification.” However, many
judges were former prosecutors (Falk
pg. 148).
• In New York, there are 1250 judges.
“These judges have little education.
Some are not even high school
graduates. They include hair dressers,
state troopers, and phone company
12
Bias Prosecutors
• Prosecutors: withhold evidence that casts doubt on the
defendant’s guilt, making statements to the jury that might
bias them toward imposing a death sentence, striking
people from the jury who might hesitate to vote for capital
punishment, and other acts of misconduct.
• “One of the most atrocious suck confessions was coerced
from two Chicago boys, aged 7 and 8, who were pressured
by the police to confess to the murder of an 11-year-old
girl. Interrogated without lawyers or their parents, alone
and defenseless, the boys told the police what these “law
enforcers” wanted to hear (Falk).
• Falsely accuse and win “because the victim’s of false
accusations and false prosecutions are usually poor and
defenseless” (pg. 35).
• “Their own reelection depends on the public’s belief that
the prosecutor has gained large numbers of convictions”
Informing the Public
• Created a Facebook Group
• Posted information, links, and this
PowerPoint presentation and asked people
to comment.
• “How did this affect your opinion or change
your beliefs?”
• PLEASE COMMENT! WHATEVER YOU
THINK / FEEL / BELIEVE!
SourcesFree Rodney Reed: He Is Innocent. Rodney’s Case on Film. Web. 07 Nov. 2010. <http://www.freerodneyreed.org/?page_id=11>.
McDonald, Robert. "The Texas Railroad to Death Row." CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names.
6 Apr. 2006. Web. 07 Nov. 2010. <http:// www.counterpunch.org/mcdonald04062006.html>.
"Rodney Reed Hearing Stirring Bastrop County." KXAN News, 25 Mar. 2006. Web. 07 Nov. 2010.
<http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=207906;article=14197;title=Against Death Rows>.
Robinson, Bruce A. "Facts about Capital Punishment - the Death Penalty." ReligiousTolerance.org by the Ontario Consultants on
Religious Tolerance. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 1995. Web. 08 Nov. 2010.
<http://www.religioustolerance.org/executj.htm>.
Applegate, B. (2006). The Myth that the Death Penalty is Administered Fairly In R. Bohm, & J. T. Walker (Eds.), Demystifying
Crime and Criminal Justice (pp.158-166). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
Falk, Gerhard. The American Criminal Justice System: How It Works, How It Doesn't, and How to Fix It. Praeger Publishers, 2010.
Print.
Tabak, Ronald J. "The Egregiously Unfair Implementation of Capital Punishment in the United States: 'Super Due Process' or Super
Lack of Due Process?" Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 147.1 (2003): n. pag.JSTOR. Web. 14 Nov.
2010.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558124>

More Related Content

What's hot

The New Jim Crow: A Study
The New Jim Crow: A StudyThe New Jim Crow: A Study
The New Jim Crow: A StudyAriel Jones
 
FINAL 2016 Annual Report
FINAL 2016 Annual ReportFINAL 2016 Annual Report
FINAL 2016 Annual ReportMandy Medlock
 
Hate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusHate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusMark Litwa
 
Death penalty fact sheet
Death penalty fact sheetDeath penalty fact sheet
Death penalty fact sheetsevans-idaho
 
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 No. 2 February 2015
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter   Vol. 2 No. 2  February 2015The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter   Vol. 2 No. 2  February 2015
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 No. 2 February 2015C4CFED
 
The Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie Daniels
The Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie DanielsThe Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie Daniels
The Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie DanielsRBG Communiversity
 
Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2
Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2
Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2Paul M. Patterson
 
Matters of race handout
Matters of race handoutMatters of race handout
Matters of race handoutyvettefraga
 
Stuck-in-the-70s-Final-Report
Stuck-in-the-70s-Final-ReportStuck-in-the-70s-Final-Report
Stuck-in-the-70s-Final-ReportDarryl Long
 

What's hot (9)

The New Jim Crow: A Study
The New Jim Crow: A StudyThe New Jim Crow: A Study
The New Jim Crow: A Study
 
FINAL 2016 Annual Report
FINAL 2016 Annual ReportFINAL 2016 Annual Report
FINAL 2016 Annual Report
 
Hate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On CampusHate Crimes On Campus
Hate Crimes On Campus
 
Death penalty fact sheet
Death penalty fact sheetDeath penalty fact sheet
Death penalty fact sheet
 
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 No. 2 February 2015
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter   Vol. 2 No. 2  February 2015The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter   Vol. 2 No. 2  February 2015
The C4C Federal Exchange Newsletter Vol. 2 No. 2 February 2015
 
The Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie Daniels
The Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie DanielsThe Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie Daniels
The Death Penalty, Racism and the American Practice of Lynching, Jessie Daniels
 
Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2
Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2
Innovator Newsletter - Volume 1, Issue 2
 
Matters of race handout
Matters of race handoutMatters of race handout
Matters of race handout
 
Stuck-in-the-70s-Final-Report
Stuck-in-the-70s-Final-ReportStuck-in-the-70s-Final-Report
Stuck-in-the-70s-Final-Report
 

Similar to Bias in the Capital Punishment System

Anti dp
Anti dpAnti dp
Anti dpGP10
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10windleh
 
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16Katy Collins
 
Race-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury NullificationRace-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury NullificationVisualBee.com
 
Against the death penalty
Against the death penaltyAgainst the death penalty
Against the death penaltydonadair
 
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptxCRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptxyvettemm100
 
Chapter 10
Chapter 10Chapter 10
Chapter 10glickauf
 
Capital punishment
Capital punishmentCapital punishment
Capital punishmenttvlndgrlcain
 
Crim 215 wrongful convictions
Crim 215 wrongful convictions Crim 215 wrongful convictions
Crim 215 wrongful convictions katherinehaberl
 
Latinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptx
Latinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptxLatinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptx
Latinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptxAnkur234660
 
The Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the Missing
The Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the MissingThe Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the Missing
The Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the MissingThermo Fisher Scientific
 
Ryan.brehmer.delaware and the death penalty
Ryan.brehmer.delaware and the death penaltyRyan.brehmer.delaware and the death penalty
Ryan.brehmer.delaware and the death penaltyRWB0314
 
Anti Death Penalty
Anti Death PenaltyAnti Death Penalty
Anti Death PenaltyGP10
 
Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]
Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]
Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]Mace711
 
Chapter 14
Chapter 14Chapter 14
Chapter 14glickauf
 
Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344Mimi Harvill
 
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docxRACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docxalisondakintxt
 
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdfAGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdfapexcomputer54
 

Similar to Bias in the Capital Punishment System (20)

Anti dp
Anti dpAnti dp
Anti dp
 
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
Pollock ethics 8e_ch10
 
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
Equal in the Eyes of the Law 12.12.16
 
Race-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury NullificationRace-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury Nullification
 
Against the death penalty
Against the death penaltyAgainst the death penalty
Against the death penalty
 
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptxCRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
CRIJ4385_Death Penalty_F23.pptx
 
Chapter 10
Chapter 10Chapter 10
Chapter 10
 
Capital punishment
Capital punishmentCapital punishment
Capital punishment
 
Crim 215 wrongful convictions
Crim 215 wrongful convictions Crim 215 wrongful convictions
Crim 215 wrongful convictions
 
Latinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptx
Latinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptxLatinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptx
Latinos and Law Ethics Center Talk 2016 (1).pptx
 
The Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the Missing
The Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the MissingThe Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the Missing
The Potential of Forensic Genetics in Resolving the Fate of the Missing
 
O-Nov2 copy
O-Nov2 copyO-Nov2 copy
O-Nov2 copy
 
Ryan.brehmer.delaware and the death penalty
Ryan.brehmer.delaware and the death penaltyRyan.brehmer.delaware and the death penalty
Ryan.brehmer.delaware and the death penalty
 
Anti Death Penalty
Anti Death PenaltyAnti Death Penalty
Anti Death Penalty
 
Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]
Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]
Stages%2520of%2520criminal%2520trials%2520week%25206[1][1]
 
Chapter 14
Chapter 14Chapter 14
Chapter 14
 
Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344
 
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docxRACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
RACE, ETHNICITY, AND THE DEATH PENALTYConstitutionality.docx
 
Sheppard v. Maxwell
Sheppard v. MaxwellSheppard v. Maxwell
Sheppard v. Maxwell
 
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdfAGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTYStephen B. BrightAttorney Stephen B. Br.pdf
 

Bias in the Capital Punishment System

  • 1. Bias in The Capital Punishment System Group 8: Alyssa Morgan Daniel Valdez David Poznansky Hayden Lambert Justin Rosenthal
  • 2. Stats on Racial Bias • From 1995 to 2000, federal prosecutors sought Death Penalty for 183 defendants; 74% were minorities. • Of the 21 people on death row as of 2001, 81% were black or Hispanic. • Among black defendants found guilty of murdering a white person: • 57.5% of defendants with "stereotypically black" features -- broad noses, thick lips, dark skin and hair -- were sentenced to death. • 24.4% of men who were rated as less stereotypically black were given the death sentence. • Among black defendants found guilty of murdering a black person: • 45% of the "stereotypically black" defendants were sentenced to death. • "In 82% of the studies [reviewed], race of the victim was found to influence the likelihood of being charged with capital murder or receiving the death penalty, i.e., those who murdered whites were found more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered blacks.” - United States General Accounting Office, Death Penalty Sentencing, February 1990 http://www.religioustolerance.org/executj.htm
  • 3. RACE OF DEFENDANTS EXECUTED IN THE U.S. SINCE 1976 BLACK: 425 people or 34.93% LATINO: 91 people or 7.15% WHITE: 692 people or 56.06% OTHER: 25 people or1.85% NOTE: The federal government counts some categories, such as Hispanics, as an ethnic group rather than a race. DPIC refers to all groups as races because the sources for much of our information use these categories. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/race-death- row-inmates-executed-1976
  • 4. RACE OF VICTIMS SINCE 1976 BLACK: 274 people or 14.51% LATINO: 106 people or 5.41% WHITE: 1394 people or 77.86% OTHER: 47people or 2.22% NOTE: Number of Victims refers to the victims in the underlying murder in cases where an execution has occurred since the restoration of the death penalty in 1976. There are more victims than executions because some cases involve more than one victim http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/race-death- row-inmates-executed-1976
  • 5. CURRENT U.S. DEATH ROW POPULATION BY RACE BLACK: 1,351 people or 41.43% LATINO: 383 people or 11.74% WHITE: 1,448 people or 44.40% OTHER: 79 people or 2.42% http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/race-death- row-inmates-executed-1976
  • 6. “How Prosecutors Fabricated the Case Against Rodney Reed” -ROBERT McDONALD • In 1998 an African American male named Rodney Reed is accused of murdering a 19 year old, white, female named, Stacy Stites. • Over ten years later, Rodney still sits on death row awaiting his last appeal. • He got a new hearing due to “allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, suppressed evidence and contrary eyewitness reports that have simmered away for years” (McDonald). http://www.counterpunch.org/mcdonald04062006.html
  • 7. What is wrong with this picture? • He is a black male, accused of killing a white female. • The female was engaged to an officer of Bastrop County. • Witnesses and some evidence were never presented in court. • The judge of his appeal hearing was the daughter of the original judge who convicted him. • The lead investigator in the case, Ed Salmela (and also a friend of Jimmy Fennel, her fiancé) committed suicide during the middle of their case. • Their apartment was never investigated, even though it was the last place Stites was known to be before she died. • The truck was given back to Fennel, even though bodily fluids were found on the passenger side.
  • 8. 8 Defense Attorneys• Serving as a court-appointed attorney is an initiation to “real” legal work. • “I was more or less dragged, kicking and screaming, into working on the death penalty.” • “My arrangement with the law firm enabled me to spend a substantial amount of my time doing free legal work for poor people” (Tabak). • “some sleep during the trial, and some even fail to call a single witness in their client’s defense” (Applegate). • AND, some never object during at trial
  • 9. Bias Juries • Jury Selection- 5% of accused offenders face trial by jury. • Prosecution and defense try to “find a jury competent to try” the accused. • Allen Snyder “prides himself on achieving a death penalty verdict against as many defendants as possible, prevented blacks from participating in the jury” (Falk).
  • 10. 10 Capital Jury Project • Jurors tend to make decisions about the appropriate sentence prematurely. • Jurors were selected in such a way that those inclined to impose the death sentence were overrepresented. • Jurors did not understand the instructions on how to decide whether the capital sentence was appropriate. • Juries frequently believed that the law required the death sentence. • Jurors largely felt that the choice of punishment was out of their hands. • Both the racial composition of the jury and the race of individual jurors influence capital decision. • Jurors tend to underestimate the severity of non-death alternative punishments.
  • 11. 11 Bias Judges• State Judges face re-election, therefore they are seeking to gain many guilty verdicts to look “successful” and “tough on crime” • Judges who hear appeal cases “serve as important rectifiers of injustices perpetrated by prosecutors or resulting from false eyewitness identification.” However, many judges were former prosecutors (Falk pg. 148). • In New York, there are 1250 judges. “These judges have little education. Some are not even high school graduates. They include hair dressers, state troopers, and phone company
  • 12. 12 Bias Prosecutors • Prosecutors: withhold evidence that casts doubt on the defendant’s guilt, making statements to the jury that might bias them toward imposing a death sentence, striking people from the jury who might hesitate to vote for capital punishment, and other acts of misconduct. • “One of the most atrocious suck confessions was coerced from two Chicago boys, aged 7 and 8, who were pressured by the police to confess to the murder of an 11-year-old girl. Interrogated without lawyers or their parents, alone and defenseless, the boys told the police what these “law enforcers” wanted to hear (Falk). • Falsely accuse and win “because the victim’s of false accusations and false prosecutions are usually poor and defenseless” (pg. 35). • “Their own reelection depends on the public’s belief that the prosecutor has gained large numbers of convictions”
  • 13. Informing the Public • Created a Facebook Group • Posted information, links, and this PowerPoint presentation and asked people to comment. • “How did this affect your opinion or change your beliefs?” • PLEASE COMMENT! WHATEVER YOU THINK / FEEL / BELIEVE!
  • 14. SourcesFree Rodney Reed: He Is Innocent. Rodney’s Case on Film. Web. 07 Nov. 2010. <http://www.freerodneyreed.org/?page_id=11>. McDonald, Robert. "The Texas Railroad to Death Row." CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names. 6 Apr. 2006. Web. 07 Nov. 2010. <http:// www.counterpunch.org/mcdonald04062006.html>. "Rodney Reed Hearing Stirring Bastrop County." KXAN News, 25 Mar. 2006. Web. 07 Nov. 2010. <http://disc.yourwebapps.com/discussion.cgi?disc=207906;article=14197;title=Against Death Rows>. Robinson, Bruce A. "Facts about Capital Punishment - the Death Penalty." ReligiousTolerance.org by the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, 1995. Web. 08 Nov. 2010. <http://www.religioustolerance.org/executj.htm>. Applegate, B. (2006). The Myth that the Death Penalty is Administered Fairly In R. Bohm, & J. T. Walker (Eds.), Demystifying Crime and Criminal Justice (pp.158-166). Los Angeles: Roxbury. Falk, Gerhard. The American Criminal Justice System: How It Works, How It Doesn't, and How to Fix It. Praeger Publishers, 2010. Print. Tabak, Ronald J. "The Egregiously Unfair Implementation of Capital Punishment in the United States: 'Super Due Process' or Super Lack of Due Process?" Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 147.1 (2003): n. pag.JSTOR. Web. 14 Nov. 2010.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/1558124>

Editor's Notes

  1. I don’t know what to title it.. So if you could think of one that would be great!