The document summarizes the Western Massachusetts Casino Health Impact Assessment (WMCHIA). The WMCHIA was conducted from 2013-2014 to evaluate potential health impacts of developing a casino in Springfield, MA. It involved stakeholders and experts. The assessment followed the standard 6 steps for HIAs: screening, scoping, assessment, recommendations, reporting, and monitoring. It focused on jobs/employment, gambling access, traffic, and crime/safety. Recommendations addressed strategies to maximize benefits and mitigate harms related to these areas. The report was disseminated to stakeholders and the public to inform decision-making around casino development and regulation.
The document discusses Fairfax County's Diversion First program, which aims to provide alternatives to incarceration for those with mental illnesses, substance abuse disorders, or developmental disabilities who come into contact with the criminal justice system for low-level offenses. It outlines the goals of treatment and prevention over incarceration, describes how the program works across various intercept points, and highlights the roles of the police department, community services board, courts, and other county agencies in making the program a success.
Diversion First: Briefing, Progress-to-Date, and a Look to the FutureFairfax County
Diversion First: Briefing, Progress-to-Date, and a Look to the Future
Presentation to the Public Safety Committee of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
Diversion First Stakeholders Meeting: July 11, 2016Fairfax County
This document provides updates from the Diversion-Oriented System of Care Collaborative stakeholders meeting on July 11, 2016. It discusses good news including increased funding for diversion programs, grant awards, and Fairfax County being accepted to a national leadership academy. Work groups gave reports on activities. Data was presented showing increases in cases handled by the Merrifield Crisis Response Center and emergency custody orders from 2015 to 2016. Training numbers and juvenile diversion pilot program details were also summarized. The document outlines progress and future goals of the collaborative.
Diversion First - Feb. 7, 2017: Stakeholders UpdateFairfax County
The document provides an agenda and notes from a February 7, 2017 stakeholders meeting for the Diversion-Oriented System of Care Collaborative. The agenda included reviewing accomplishments from 2016, sharing success stories, and hearing reports from various work groups. A survey of stakeholders found that the top priorities over the next year were progressing specialized court services, developing an evaluation system, and ensuring access to treatment for diverted individuals. Preliminary data from 2016 showed increases in diversions and Emergency Custody Orders. Work groups discussed continued communications efforts, recent data and evaluation findings, and workforce development initiatives like Crisis Intervention Team training.
Diversion First Stakeholders Meeting: July 17, 2017Fairfax County
The document summarizes updates from the Stakeholders Meeting on July 17, 2017. Key points include:
- The meeting included briefings on super utilizers, housing updates, the problem-solving team, and the Merrifield Crisis Response Center.
- Data was presented showing increases in screenings and placements for pretrial supervision since screenings began occurring at booking rather than in court.
- Goals for the next 3-6 months include finalizing hiring, expanding crisis response services, tracking outcomes, and continuing to address issues for high utilizers.
Diversion First: Diversion-Oriented System of Care Stakeholders Update: Oct. ...Fairfax County
The document provides an update on Fairfax County's Diversion-Oriented System of Care initiative from its October 17, 2016 stakeholders meeting. Key points include: data showing increased use of emergency custody orders and instances where law enforcement diverted individuals from arrest to mental health services; expansion of crisis intervention team training for first responders; progress in screening and evaluating defendants for mental health needs in the court system; and plans to expand the initiative's focus in 2017 to additional intercept points in the justice system.
Diversion First: Progress-to-Date, and a Look to the Future: Fall 2016Fairfax County
This document provides an overview and update on Fairfax County, Virginia's Diversion First program, which aims to divert individuals with mental illnesses or developmental disabilities away from the criminal justice system and into treatment programs whenever possible. The summary is:
The document discusses the national context of high incarceration rates for those with mental illnesses. It then defines Fairfax County's Diversion First program, examines what happens when individuals are diverted from jails into treatment, and reviews early results showing over 25% of transports by law enforcement to the crisis center had potential criminal charges diverted to mental health services. Cost savings from diversion into treatment are also noted.
The document discusses Fairfax County's Diversion First program, which aims to provide alternatives to incarceration for those with mental illnesses, substance abuse disorders, or developmental disabilities who come into contact with the criminal justice system for low-level offenses. It outlines the goals of treatment and prevention over incarceration, describes how the program works across various intercept points, and highlights the roles of the police department, community services board, courts, and other county agencies in making the program a success.
Diversion First: Briefing, Progress-to-Date, and a Look to the FutureFairfax County
Diversion First: Briefing, Progress-to-Date, and a Look to the Future
Presentation to the Public Safety Committee of the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors
Diversion First Stakeholders Meeting: July 11, 2016Fairfax County
This document provides updates from the Diversion-Oriented System of Care Collaborative stakeholders meeting on July 11, 2016. It discusses good news including increased funding for diversion programs, grant awards, and Fairfax County being accepted to a national leadership academy. Work groups gave reports on activities. Data was presented showing increases in cases handled by the Merrifield Crisis Response Center and emergency custody orders from 2015 to 2016. Training numbers and juvenile diversion pilot program details were also summarized. The document outlines progress and future goals of the collaborative.
Diversion First - Feb. 7, 2017: Stakeholders UpdateFairfax County
The document provides an agenda and notes from a February 7, 2017 stakeholders meeting for the Diversion-Oriented System of Care Collaborative. The agenda included reviewing accomplishments from 2016, sharing success stories, and hearing reports from various work groups. A survey of stakeholders found that the top priorities over the next year were progressing specialized court services, developing an evaluation system, and ensuring access to treatment for diverted individuals. Preliminary data from 2016 showed increases in diversions and Emergency Custody Orders. Work groups discussed continued communications efforts, recent data and evaluation findings, and workforce development initiatives like Crisis Intervention Team training.
Diversion First Stakeholders Meeting: July 17, 2017Fairfax County
The document summarizes updates from the Stakeholders Meeting on July 17, 2017. Key points include:
- The meeting included briefings on super utilizers, housing updates, the problem-solving team, and the Merrifield Crisis Response Center.
- Data was presented showing increases in screenings and placements for pretrial supervision since screenings began occurring at booking rather than in court.
- Goals for the next 3-6 months include finalizing hiring, expanding crisis response services, tracking outcomes, and continuing to address issues for high utilizers.
Diversion First: Diversion-Oriented System of Care Stakeholders Update: Oct. ...Fairfax County
The document provides an update on Fairfax County's Diversion-Oriented System of Care initiative from its October 17, 2016 stakeholders meeting. Key points include: data showing increased use of emergency custody orders and instances where law enforcement diverted individuals from arrest to mental health services; expansion of crisis intervention team training for first responders; progress in screening and evaluating defendants for mental health needs in the court system; and plans to expand the initiative's focus in 2017 to additional intercept points in the justice system.
Diversion First: Progress-to-Date, and a Look to the Future: Fall 2016Fairfax County
This document provides an overview and update on Fairfax County, Virginia's Diversion First program, which aims to divert individuals with mental illnesses or developmental disabilities away from the criminal justice system and into treatment programs whenever possible. The summary is:
The document discusses the national context of high incarceration rates for those with mental illnesses. It then defines Fairfax County's Diversion First program, examines what happens when individuals are diverted from jails into treatment, and reviews early results showing over 25% of transports by law enforcement to the crisis center had potential criminal charges diverted to mental health services. Cost savings from diversion into treatment are also noted.
- The document discusses evaluating responsible gambling programs and initiatives. It provides an overview of the Reno model for developing responsible gambling strategies using scientific principles and evaluation. It also summarizes research on various responsible gambling tools and programs, finding limited but promising evidence. Evaluation of initiatives like GameSense at Plainridge Park Casino in Massachusetts is discussed as important to understanding responsible gambling impacts.
1. The document provides guidance for charity trustees on effectively campaigning within legal compliance, including understanding the different types of campaigning, managing risks, and campaigning during election periods. 2. It discusses trustees' duties to further their charity's objectives, tips for good campaigning practice, and issues trustees should consider around compliance and influence. 3. Advice includes having a strong evidence base, strategic planning, evaluating impact, and preempting possible complaints to regulators.
Health Impact Assessment: Healthier Places, Empowered PeoplePractical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a structured and innovative process for prospectively assessing the potential impacts of a project, program or policy on the health and well-being of populations. In order to support capacity building in the field of HIA, the National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy (NCCHPP) has developed an online course on HIA. This 5-hour course is available free of charge in English and French and can be accessed at any time upon registration. It aims to familiarize participants with the process of conducting health impact assessments of projects, programs, and policies in collaboration with relevant stakeholders.
Hia presentation for health disparities group revisedDanielle Aloia
A health impact assessment is a systematic process that evaluates the potential effects of proposed policies, programs, or projects on the health of populations and the distribution of effects within populations. It involves screening, scoping, assessment, recommendations, and monitoring/evaluation steps. Health impact assessments aim to promote health equity by authentically engaging stakeholders, evaluating impacts on vulnerable groups, identifying recommendations to maximize health benefits for those facing health disparities, and communicating results in culturally appropriate ways. Examples provided assessed proposed legislation to protect domestic workers in California, revisions to Minnesota school siting guidelines, and changes to a Massachusetts housing assistance program. Emerging issues discussed opportunities to further health equity as well as challenges regarding timing, stakeholders, evidence, and legal frameworks.
Better Healthcare Through Community and Stakeholder Engagement, 2015 Webinar ...Paul Gallant
"An enjoyable presentation, well-delivered with excellent insight into community and stakeholder engagement strategies. Terry Dyni - July 23, 2015" on the webinar version. This version is my complete slide deck from a live webinar presentation requested by the Conference Board of Canada. April, 2015. Thanks for your interest in Better Healthcare Through Community and Stakeholder Engagement.
Compliments of Paul W. Gallant, CHE, GALLANT HEALTHWORKS & Associates (GHWA), Vancouver, BC, Canada. PS See the last slide for contact details or to arrange customized training/facilitation or advice on your organizational needs.
Community diagnosis is a tool used in Healthy Cities Projects to understand community health. It involves collecting both quantitative and qualitative data on health status, determinants of health, and potential for healthy city development. The process includes setting up a committee, defining the scope, collecting data through surveys and statistics, analyzing trends and comparisons, reaching diagnoses, and disseminating results through reports and presentations to influence policy. Conducting community diagnosis regularly allows Healthy Cities Projects to continuously improve public health.
This document summarizes a presentation made to Cornerstone Family Healthcare about increasing patient acquisition and retention. It includes an executive overview, literature review of secondary data on FQHCs and the local area, findings from a community survey and listening session used as primary data, and recommendations. The survey found residents have low mobility, income, and insurance coverage higher than expected. Preventative care is important and knowledge of Cornerstone's services is limited. Recommendations focus on the 4Cs - improving communication, consumer understanding, convenience, and lowering costs by emphasizing the sliding scale fee.
The document provides information about the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention (SACADA) organization and its youth prevention programs, adult and family services, and community coalition efforts. It details the purpose and services of the Prevention Resource Center (PRC) Region 8, including covering 28 counties in South Central Texas and enhancing substance abuse prevention. The document outlines how community members can partner with PRC Region 8 by providing data, assisting with coordination and networking, and promoting prevention efforts.
This document provides an overview of MedStar Health's first systemwide Community Health Assessment conducted in 2012. Key points:
- MedStar conducted CHAs at its 9 hospitals to better understand community health needs and guide future community benefit programming.
- Heart disease, diabetes, and obesity were identified as top priorities across most hospitals. Some hospitals selected additional unique priorities.
- Advisory task forces involving community stakeholders provided input to identify health priorities and target communities.
- Implementation strategies were developed and approved to guide hospitals' use of resources to address the identified priorities.
The document discusses lessons learned from state efforts to align quality measures across payers through State Innovation Model programs. It provides a strategic framework for developing a common measure set that includes determining an alignment strategy, articulating goals, setting the scope, engaging stakeholders, identifying selection criteria, inventorying measures, evaluating measures, selecting measures, and sustaining alignment. It highlights Washington state's development of a statewide common measure set as an example.
Paul Courtney, CCRI, University of Gloucestershire
- An overview of impact evidence gathered through the Gloucestershire POV project involving three small SPOs
- An introduction to the Social Return Assessment (SRA) tool that was developed over the course of the project through action research and the challenges revealed in developing it
- A discussion around implications for small VCS organisations with respect to measuring impact and the associated support and systems required to achieve it
This document provides an overview of SHAP (State Health Access Program) evaluations and how they can inform implementation of the Affordable Care Act. It discusses how SHAP grantees are conducting evaluations through administrative data, surveys, focus groups and ROI analyses. Grantees will report benchmarks on enrollment, costs, and qualitative measures. The evaluations can provide best practices on outreach, newly insured characteristics, and models for insurance exchanges. Technical assistance is available from SHADAC to help grantees with data, indicators, methods and a data user workshop.
F&I: Kathryn Graham - Business Intelligence II: Research ImpactCASRAI
The document discusses assessing the impact of health research and innovation from a systems perspective. It presents a Canadian framework that identifies five categories of research impact: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health benefits, and broad economic and social benefits. The framework includes a library of 66 impact indicators that can be measured at different levels. It also discusses promising tools for addressing needs across the system, including a common approach, language, and metrics to optimize measuring research impact in Canada. Building greater capacity for impact assessment using a collaborative approach is advocated.
This document provides an overview of the State Health Access Program (SHAP) Data and Evaluation presentation by Elizabeth Lukanen from the State Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC). It discusses SHADAC's role in providing technical assistance to SHAP grantees, including assisting with evaluations, benchmark data collection, and lessons learned. It also outlines the progress and challenges of SHAP implementation and how SHAP activities can inform implementation of provisions in the Affordable Care Act. Contact information is provided for the Minnesota SHAP project team at SHADAC.
Presented by Nark Allman and Maria Reader at the event 'Commissioning for Culture and Sport, 5th December 2014'. Addresses the cCLOA/Sport England commissioning project.
Event details:
http://knowhownonprofit.org/events/commissioning-for-culture-and-sport-5th-december-2014
Part of the Cultural Commissioning Programme:
http://www.ncvo.org.uk/cultural-commissioning-programme
Treating the whole community - Sarah Dixon, MPA (20181212)PolicyMap
Health care providers and government agencies can benefit from knowing more about the communities they serve. They can address issues unique to low-income patients and other groups with specific needs, improving outcomes and lowering medical costs. Using a data-driven approach to public health, they can successfully implement targeted health interventions, while lowering costs.
We hear from two practitioners and researchers who will talk about ways that they’re using community level data to improve public health: Sarah Dixon from the Iowa Primary Care Association and Amy Carroll-Scott from Drexel University’s Dornsife School of Public Health.
A community-driven social marketing approach to policy developmentcraig lefebvre
This presentation at the World Social Marketing Conference presents a rationale for expanding the scope of social marketing to change markets through policy change to improve health. The original community-based prevention model has been re-imagined as a process to guide community coalitions in the selection and marketing of policy options. The presentation highlights the basics of this approach, and describes its implementation in Lousiville, KY by a coalition tackling childhood obesity. What began as an idea to focus on schools became a much larger environmental and policy initiative as the coalition used the revised CBPM process to arrive at innovative approaches for addressing food deserts and dual use of school facilities.
The document discusses engaging the public in improving the health of ponds in Brewster, Massachusetts. It outlines challenges like many ponds being surrounded by private property. It also describes strategies used in Brewster to educate residents and form citizen groups to address issues like stormwater runoff, fertilizer use, and septic systems impacting pond water quality. These efforts included public meetings, social media outreach, and helping interested groups organize independently while providing support. As a result, several new citizen groups have formed to advocate for pond stewardship.
The City of Milton, Massachusetts is facing increased flooding risks along the Granite River due to more intense rainfall and increased impervious surfaces from development. A recent major flood caused significant damage to homes, businesses and infrastructure. In response to concerns from residents and business owners, the mayor has tasked the City Planning Director with developing an approach to manage current and future flood risks through stakeholder engagement and climate adaptation planning.
- The document discusses evaluating responsible gambling programs and initiatives. It provides an overview of the Reno model for developing responsible gambling strategies using scientific principles and evaluation. It also summarizes research on various responsible gambling tools and programs, finding limited but promising evidence. Evaluation of initiatives like GameSense at Plainridge Park Casino in Massachusetts is discussed as important to understanding responsible gambling impacts.
1. The document provides guidance for charity trustees on effectively campaigning within legal compliance, including understanding the different types of campaigning, managing risks, and campaigning during election periods. 2. It discusses trustees' duties to further their charity's objectives, tips for good campaigning practice, and issues trustees should consider around compliance and influence. 3. Advice includes having a strong evidence base, strategic planning, evaluating impact, and preempting possible complaints to regulators.
Health Impact Assessment: Healthier Places, Empowered PeoplePractical Playbook
The Practical Playbook
National Meeting 2016
www.practicalplaybook.org
Bringing Public Health and Primary Care Together: The Practical Playbook National Meeting was at the Hyatt Regency in Bethesda, MD, May 22 - 24, 2016. The meeting was a milestone event towards advancing robust collaborations that improve population health. Key stakeholders from across sectors – representing professional associations, community organizations, government agencies and academic institutions – and across the country came together at the National Meeting to help catalyze a national movement, accelerate collaborations by fostering skill development, and connect with like-minded individuals and organizations to facilitate the exchange of ideas to drive population health improvement.
The National Meeting was also a significant source of tools and resources to advance collaboration. These tools and resources are available below and include:
Session presentations and materials
Poster session content
Photos from the National Meeting
The conversation started at the National Meeting is continuing in a LinkedIn Group "Working Together for Population Health" and Twitter. Use #PPBMeeting to provide feedback on the National Meeting.
The Practical Playbook was developed by the de Beaumont Foundation, the Duke University School of Medicine Department of Community and Family Medicine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA).
Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a structured and innovative process for prospectively assessing the potential impacts of a project, program or policy on the health and well-being of populations. In order to support capacity building in the field of HIA, the National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy (NCCHPP) has developed an online course on HIA. This 5-hour course is available free of charge in English and French and can be accessed at any time upon registration. It aims to familiarize participants with the process of conducting health impact assessments of projects, programs, and policies in collaboration with relevant stakeholders.
Hia presentation for health disparities group revisedDanielle Aloia
A health impact assessment is a systematic process that evaluates the potential effects of proposed policies, programs, or projects on the health of populations and the distribution of effects within populations. It involves screening, scoping, assessment, recommendations, and monitoring/evaluation steps. Health impact assessments aim to promote health equity by authentically engaging stakeholders, evaluating impacts on vulnerable groups, identifying recommendations to maximize health benefits for those facing health disparities, and communicating results in culturally appropriate ways. Examples provided assessed proposed legislation to protect domestic workers in California, revisions to Minnesota school siting guidelines, and changes to a Massachusetts housing assistance program. Emerging issues discussed opportunities to further health equity as well as challenges regarding timing, stakeholders, evidence, and legal frameworks.
Better Healthcare Through Community and Stakeholder Engagement, 2015 Webinar ...Paul Gallant
"An enjoyable presentation, well-delivered with excellent insight into community and stakeholder engagement strategies. Terry Dyni - July 23, 2015" on the webinar version. This version is my complete slide deck from a live webinar presentation requested by the Conference Board of Canada. April, 2015. Thanks for your interest in Better Healthcare Through Community and Stakeholder Engagement.
Compliments of Paul W. Gallant, CHE, GALLANT HEALTHWORKS & Associates (GHWA), Vancouver, BC, Canada. PS See the last slide for contact details or to arrange customized training/facilitation or advice on your organizational needs.
Community diagnosis is a tool used in Healthy Cities Projects to understand community health. It involves collecting both quantitative and qualitative data on health status, determinants of health, and potential for healthy city development. The process includes setting up a committee, defining the scope, collecting data through surveys and statistics, analyzing trends and comparisons, reaching diagnoses, and disseminating results through reports and presentations to influence policy. Conducting community diagnosis regularly allows Healthy Cities Projects to continuously improve public health.
This document summarizes a presentation made to Cornerstone Family Healthcare about increasing patient acquisition and retention. It includes an executive overview, literature review of secondary data on FQHCs and the local area, findings from a community survey and listening session used as primary data, and recommendations. The survey found residents have low mobility, income, and insurance coverage higher than expected. Preventative care is important and knowledge of Cornerstone's services is limited. Recommendations focus on the 4Cs - improving communication, consumer understanding, convenience, and lowering costs by emphasizing the sliding scale fee.
The document provides information about the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention (SACADA) organization and its youth prevention programs, adult and family services, and community coalition efforts. It details the purpose and services of the Prevention Resource Center (PRC) Region 8, including covering 28 counties in South Central Texas and enhancing substance abuse prevention. The document outlines how community members can partner with PRC Region 8 by providing data, assisting with coordination and networking, and promoting prevention efforts.
This document provides an overview of MedStar Health's first systemwide Community Health Assessment conducted in 2012. Key points:
- MedStar conducted CHAs at its 9 hospitals to better understand community health needs and guide future community benefit programming.
- Heart disease, diabetes, and obesity were identified as top priorities across most hospitals. Some hospitals selected additional unique priorities.
- Advisory task forces involving community stakeholders provided input to identify health priorities and target communities.
- Implementation strategies were developed and approved to guide hospitals' use of resources to address the identified priorities.
The document discusses lessons learned from state efforts to align quality measures across payers through State Innovation Model programs. It provides a strategic framework for developing a common measure set that includes determining an alignment strategy, articulating goals, setting the scope, engaging stakeholders, identifying selection criteria, inventorying measures, evaluating measures, selecting measures, and sustaining alignment. It highlights Washington state's development of a statewide common measure set as an example.
Paul Courtney, CCRI, University of Gloucestershire
- An overview of impact evidence gathered through the Gloucestershire POV project involving three small SPOs
- An introduction to the Social Return Assessment (SRA) tool that was developed over the course of the project through action research and the challenges revealed in developing it
- A discussion around implications for small VCS organisations with respect to measuring impact and the associated support and systems required to achieve it
This document provides an overview of SHAP (State Health Access Program) evaluations and how they can inform implementation of the Affordable Care Act. It discusses how SHAP grantees are conducting evaluations through administrative data, surveys, focus groups and ROI analyses. Grantees will report benchmarks on enrollment, costs, and qualitative measures. The evaluations can provide best practices on outreach, newly insured characteristics, and models for insurance exchanges. Technical assistance is available from SHADAC to help grantees with data, indicators, methods and a data user workshop.
F&I: Kathryn Graham - Business Intelligence II: Research ImpactCASRAI
The document discusses assessing the impact of health research and innovation from a systems perspective. It presents a Canadian framework that identifies five categories of research impact: advancing knowledge, capacity building, informing decision making, health benefits, and broad economic and social benefits. The framework includes a library of 66 impact indicators that can be measured at different levels. It also discusses promising tools for addressing needs across the system, including a common approach, language, and metrics to optimize measuring research impact in Canada. Building greater capacity for impact assessment using a collaborative approach is advocated.
This document provides an overview of the State Health Access Program (SHAP) Data and Evaluation presentation by Elizabeth Lukanen from the State Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC). It discusses SHADAC's role in providing technical assistance to SHAP grantees, including assisting with evaluations, benchmark data collection, and lessons learned. It also outlines the progress and challenges of SHAP implementation and how SHAP activities can inform implementation of provisions in the Affordable Care Act. Contact information is provided for the Minnesota SHAP project team at SHADAC.
Presented by Nark Allman and Maria Reader at the event 'Commissioning for Culture and Sport, 5th December 2014'. Addresses the cCLOA/Sport England commissioning project.
Event details:
http://knowhownonprofit.org/events/commissioning-for-culture-and-sport-5th-december-2014
Part of the Cultural Commissioning Programme:
http://www.ncvo.org.uk/cultural-commissioning-programme
Treating the whole community - Sarah Dixon, MPA (20181212)PolicyMap
Health care providers and government agencies can benefit from knowing more about the communities they serve. They can address issues unique to low-income patients and other groups with specific needs, improving outcomes and lowering medical costs. Using a data-driven approach to public health, they can successfully implement targeted health interventions, while lowering costs.
We hear from two practitioners and researchers who will talk about ways that they’re using community level data to improve public health: Sarah Dixon from the Iowa Primary Care Association and Amy Carroll-Scott from Drexel University’s Dornsife School of Public Health.
A community-driven social marketing approach to policy developmentcraig lefebvre
This presentation at the World Social Marketing Conference presents a rationale for expanding the scope of social marketing to change markets through policy change to improve health. The original community-based prevention model has been re-imagined as a process to guide community coalitions in the selection and marketing of policy options. The presentation highlights the basics of this approach, and describes its implementation in Lousiville, KY by a coalition tackling childhood obesity. What began as an idea to focus on schools became a much larger environmental and policy initiative as the coalition used the revised CBPM process to arrive at innovative approaches for addressing food deserts and dual use of school facilities.
The document discusses engaging the public in improving the health of ponds in Brewster, Massachusetts. It outlines challenges like many ponds being surrounded by private property. It also describes strategies used in Brewster to educate residents and form citizen groups to address issues like stormwater runoff, fertilizer use, and septic systems impacting pond water quality. These efforts included public meetings, social media outreach, and helping interested groups organize independently while providing support. As a result, several new citizen groups have formed to advocate for pond stewardship.
The City of Milton, Massachusetts is facing increased flooding risks along the Granite River due to more intense rainfall and increased impervious surfaces from development. A recent major flood caused significant damage to homes, businesses and infrastructure. In response to concerns from residents and business owners, the mayor has tasked the City Planning Director with developing an approach to manage current and future flood risks through stakeholder engagement and climate adaptation planning.
The document summarizes different tools used in climate adaptation planning including risk assessments, stakeholder assessments, and role-play simulations. Risk assessments took climate data to highlight local vulnerabilities and opportunities to enhance resilience over short, medium, and long time periods. Stakeholder assessments engaged stakeholders to understand how climate impacts may affect different groups and identify barriers to action. Role-play simulations allowed participants to engage with simulated climate-related problems to gain insights and enhance relationships for collaboration on adaptation planning.
This document summarizes a project to assess the vulnerability of Rhode Island's transportation assets to sea level rise. It developed methods to rank roads, public transportation routes, and bridges based on their exposure to flooding from 1 foot, 3 feet, and 5 feet of sea level rise. The top 10 most vulnerable state-owned roads, RIPTA bus routes, and bridges were identified. Adaptation strategies such as protecting, accommodating, and retreating from vulnerable assets were also discussed. The project aims to help prioritize spending, planning, and goal-setting to enhance resilience of transportation infrastructure.
The document summarizes a session that discussed plans to improve connectivity in Marstons Mills, MA through corridor redesign. A group of professionals from the Town of Barnstable and consulting firms presented four options for redesigning the Cash Market intersection to improve safety, traffic flow, and the village atmosphere. The preferred option was a realigned intersection with a platform design to calm traffic and maintain parking. The project involved extensive community engagement to gather input and achieve consensus on the redesign plans.
This document summarizes a session that discussed plans to redesign the intersections and streetscape in Marstons Mills, Massachusetts to improve pedestrian safety, traffic flow, and sense of place. The project focused on the Cash Market intersection and surrounding village areas. Attendees broke into groups to develop preferred concept designs, considering tools like traffic calming, complete streets elements, and green infrastructure. Recommendations included a realigned intersection, platform crossing, bump-outs, bollards, signs, and on-street parking. Extensive community engagement and partnership with local groups was cited as critical to the project's success.
The document summarizes different tools used in climate adaptation planning including risk assessments, stakeholder assessments, and role-play simulations. Risk assessments take climate data to highlight local vulnerabilities and opportunities to enhance resilience over short, medium, and long time periods. Stakeholder assessments engage stakeholders to understand how climate impacts may affect different groups and identify barriers to action. Role-play simulations allow decision-makers and others to engage with problems similar to real climate challenges through hypothetical scenarios.
The City of Milton, Massachusetts is facing increased flooding risks along the Granite River due to more intense rainfall and increased impervious surfaces from development. A recent major flood caused significant damage to homes, businesses and infrastructure. In response to concerns from residents and business owners, the mayor has tasked the City Planning Director with developing an approach to manage current and future flood risks through stakeholder engagement and climate adaptation planning.
G1 necap sneapa presentation final no notesPlanning_1
This document outlines a workshop on climate adaptation planning tools hosted by the New England Climate Adaptation Project. The workshop included an introduction to the project, a scenario exercise, and a presentation on adaptation planning tools such as risk assessments, stakeholder assessments, and role-playing simulations. A poll of New England residents found most are concerned about climate impacts but skeptical their towns can respond effectively. The workshop aimed to help communities better understand climate risks and consider how to incorporate adaptation into planning and decision-making.
C5 thursday the ties that bind connecting community plansPlanning_1
The document discusses Los Angeles' development of an Integrated Consolidated Plan. It aimed to guide neighborhood investment, leverage transit funding, and depoliticize decisions. Key aspects included educating officials, establishing working groups, holding workshops, and reorganizing agencies. The process focused on collaboration between leadership, staff, communities, and departments to connect plans and people.
The document outlines the idealized planning process, which typically involves 7 steps: 1) defining a problem or goal, 2) gathering information, 3) making projections and forecasts, 4) determining alternatives, 5) selecting a preferred strategy or course of action, 6) implementing the strategy or action, and 7) evaluating the results and repeating the process as needed. However, the document notes that the planning process is often not so straightforward in practice.
The document discusses Milford, CT's steps to integrate risk and resiliency into local planning based on FEMA's 4 core steps for hazard mitigation plan implementation. It summarizes Step 1 as forming partnerships between various city departments and agencies. Step 2 involves assessing risks such as flood zones, number of flood policies, and average premiums paid. Step 3 is to develop a mitigation plan by involving stakeholders and keeping risks as a focus. Step 4 is to implement the plan by applying for funding, preparing officials for costs, and committing future resources to mitigation efforts.
The document summarizes key recommendations for strengthening community resilience in the face of climate change impacts. It outlines 9 tips for planners, policymakers, and other organizations to use in preparing for and responding to climate change. The tips include strengthening social networks and community involvement, incorporating mental health into disaster preparation, developing trusted warning systems, paying attention to vulnerable groups, fostering optimism and a sense of safety, and being sensitive to displaced peoples' needs.
The document discusses crafting a "whole community" approach to natural hazard mitigation and climate adaptation. It summarizes the Natural Hazard Mitigation Association and its goal of bringing together groups interested in these issues. Key themes discussed include thinking about problems in a systems manner, collaboration among diverse groups, and developing incentives for safe behavior. The document advocates for moving beyond minimum standards to prioritize community safety and resilience.
This document summarizes a conference on integrating hazard risk and mitigation into community planning. It discusses barriers to integration such as lack of public support, limited budgets, and lack of awareness of risks. The most important factors for effective integration are strong intergovernmental coordination, leadership support, risk awareness, understanding benefits of mitigation, and incentives. Key steps are to assess planning frameworks for resilience, engage stakeholders, establish integration goals, look for opportunities, and continually monitor and improve efforts. The document encourages attendees to apply these ideas in their own work.
This document summarizes the Highway Murals project on Route 95 in Pawtucket, RI. It describes the artist, Gretchen Dow Simpson, and her inspiration for the murals depicting the Blackstone River Corridor. It outlines the process of painting the first mural near Exit 27, including selecting the site and creating a photoshopped image of the proposed mural. For the second mural near Exit 29, the proportions of the photoshopped design did not match the actual curved wall, requiring them to hastily redesign the image to fit the space. The document provides an overview of the murals painted and acknowledges those involved in the project.
This document presents a branding and wayfinding design for Rhode Island created by Roll Barresi & Associates. It includes branding elements like colors, typography and logos inspired by Rhode Island's nautical and historic influences. It also outlines sign structures, forms and materials, as well as locations that would feature the signage around the state. The design aims to create a unified identity and improve wayfinding to sites throughout Rhode Island.
The document discusses the Rhode Island Gateway Improvement Project led by Jonathan Stevens as the Director of Special Projects for Governor Lincoln D. Chafee. The project aims to improve Rhode Island's gateways and entrances. It is mentioned 10 times, indicating it is a major initiative for the state.
This document summarizes Ronald Lee Fleming's views on placemaking and infrastructure projects. It advocates that 1) new infrastructure should strengthen communities rather than divide them, 2) artists should be involved in the planning process to craft narratives about place, and 3) a modest budget for public art can build community value and support for projects. The document provides examples of projects the Townscape Institute has worked on that transformed communities through enhancing streetscapes, parks, and public spaces. It recommends that future development should preserve and enhance the distinctive character of places.
This document discusses the importance of maintaining infrastructure and the aesthetics of communities. It notes that neglected environments can encourage crime and discourage economic development, while ongoing maintenance acts as a deterrent. The program aims to improve roadways through public art, signage, lighting, landscaping, and painting to create a unique identity for Rhode Island and aid economic growth. Maintaining an attractive community improves quality of life.
Gamify it until you make it Improving Agile Development and Operations with ...Ben Linders
So many challenges, so little time. While we’re busy developing software and keeping it operational, we also need to sharpen the saw, but how? Gamification can be a way to look at how you’re doing and find out where to improve. It’s a great way to have everyone involved and get the best out of people.
In this presentation, Ben Linders will show how playing games with the DevOps coaching cards can help to explore your current development and deployment (DevOps) practices and decide as a team what to improve or experiment with.
The games that we play are based on an engagement model. Instead of imposing change, the games enable people to pull in ideas for change and apply those in a way that best suits their collective needs.
By playing games, you can learn from each other. Teams can use games, exercises, and coaching cards to discuss values, principles, and practices, and share their experiences and learnings.
Different game formats can be used to share experiences on DevOps principles and practices and explore how they can be applied effectively. This presentation provides an overview of playing formats and will inspire you to come up with your own formats.
• For a full set of 530+ questions. Go to
https://skillcertpro.com/product/servicenow-cis-itsm-exam-questions/
• SkillCertPro offers detailed explanations to each question which helps to understand the concepts better.
• It is recommended to score above 85% in SkillCertPro exams before attempting a real exam.
• SkillCertPro updates exam questions every 2 weeks.
• You will get life time access and life time free updates
• SkillCertPro assures 100% pass guarantee in first attempt.
11June 2024. An online pre-engagement session was organized on Tuesday June 11 to introduce the Science Policy Lab approach and the main components of the conceptual framework.
About 40 experts from around the globe gathered online for a pre-engagement session, paving the way for the first SASi-SPi Science Policy Lab event scheduled for June 18-19, 2024 in Malmö. The session presented the objectives for the upcoming Science Policy Lab (S-PoL), which featured a role-playing game designed to simulate stakeholder interactions and policy interventions for food systems transitions. Participants called for the sharing of meeting materials and continued collaboration, reflecting a strong commitment to advancing towards sustainable agrifood systems.
1.) Introduction
Our Movement is not new; it is the same as it was for Freedom, Justice, and Equality since we were labeled as slaves. However, this movement at its core must entail economics.
2.) Historical Context
This is the same movement because none of the previous movements, such as boycotts, were ever completed. For some, maybe, but for the most part, it’s just a place to keep your stable until you’re ready to assimilate them into your system. The rest of the crabs are left in the world’s worst parts, begging for scraps.
3.) Economic Empowerment
Our Movement aims to show that it is indeed possible for the less fortunate to establish their economic system. Everyone else – Caucasian, Asian, Mexican, Israeli, Jews, etc. – has their systems, and they all set up and usurp money from the less fortunate. So, the less fortunate buy from every one of them, yet none of them buy from the less fortunate. Moreover, the less fortunate really don’t have anything to sell.
4.) Collaboration with Organizations
Our Movement will demonstrate how organizations such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, National Urban League, Black Lives Matter, and others can assist in creating a much more indestructible Black Wall Street.
5.) Vision for the Future
Our Movement will not settle for less than those who came before us and stopped before the rights were equal. The economy, jobs, healthcare, education, housing, incarceration – everything is unfair, and what isn’t is rigged for the less fortunate to fail, as evidenced in society.
6.) Call to Action
Our movement has started and implemented everything needed for the advancement of the economic system. There are positions for only those who understand the importance of this movement, as failure to address it will continue the degradation of the people deemed less fortunate.
No, this isn’t Noah’s Ark, nor am I a Prophet. I’m just a man who wrote a couple of books, created a magnificent website: http://www.thearkproject.llc, and who truly hopes to try and initiate a truly sustainable economic system for deprived people. We may not all have the same beliefs, but if our methods are tried, tested, and proven, we can come together and help others. My website: http://www.thearkproject.llc is very informative and considerably controversial. Please check it out, and if you are afraid, leave immediately; it’s no place for cowards. The last Prophet said: “Whoever among you sees an evil action, then let him change it with his hand [by taking action]; if he cannot, then with his tongue [by speaking out]; and if he cannot, then, with his heart – and that is the weakest of faith.” [Sahih Muslim] If we all, or even some of us, did this, there would be significant change. We are able to witness it on small and grand scales, for example, from climate control to business partnerships. I encourage, invite, and challenge you all to support me by visiting my website.
Kalyan chart satta matka guessing resultsanammadhu484
MATKASATTABOSS.COM IS INDIA'S MOST TRUSTED NO.1 WEBSITE. WE PROVIDE YOU EXACT GUESSING OF THE MATKA RESULT BY OUR TOP GUESSER, MATKASATTABOSS.COM ALWAYS PROVIDES EXACT AND FAST MATKA RESULTS. PLAY SATTA MATKA AND BECOME SATTA KING BY THE HELP OF MATKASATTABOSS.COM. INDIA'S TOP SATTA MATKA MARKET AND THEIR FAST MATKA RESULTS. GET ALL THE RESULTS AND WIN MONEY BY PERFECT KALYAN MATKA TIPS , MATKA GUESSING BY OUR TOP GUESSER AND KALYAN RAJSHREE RAJYOG SWASTIK NATRAAJ BANGLORE BIRLA RAJDHANI MILAN TIME BAZAAR MATKA CHART .
1. Planners Using Health Impact Assessments
Frank Robinson PhD, Executive Director Partners for a Healthier Community
Molly Goren-Watts Principal Planner/Manager Regional Information & Policy Center PVPC
Sang Cho, Junior Planner Intern HGSD
Peter Lowitt FAICP, Director Devens Enterprise Commission
2. Western Massachusetts Casino
Health Impact Assessment
Planners Using Health Impact Assessments
A Tool in Developing Public Policy
Thursday, October 23, 2104
Frank Robinson, PhD, Executive Director
Partners for a Healthier Community, Inc
Molly Goren-Watts, Principal Planner
Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
3. Overview and Context
Health Impact Assessment (HIA)
HIAs are NOT
Key Values that shape the HIA process
What is a HIA
….
2
4. HIAs are NOT!
• How is HIA different from other types of assessments?
• It’s not used to make the case for why a policy, program or
project should be proposed.
• It’s not an assessment to understand the impacts of a program or
policy once it has been implemented.
• It’s not a community assessment tool (i.e., MAPP, CHIP, CHA),
but those are used during assessment stage of HIA.
3
5. Key Principles & Values of a HIA
• Democracy - allows participation in policy development
and implementation
• Equity - consider distribution of health impacts, pay
attention to vulnerable groups and recommend ways to
improve proposed decisions for affected groups
• Sustainable development - judge short- and long-term
impacts of a proposal
• Ethical use of evidence - Use evidence to judge impacts
and inform recommendations, not set to support or
refute a proposal; be rigorous and transparent.
• Holistic approach to health - Be guided by the wider
determinants of health
4
6. What is an HIA?
• HIAs are different from other
assessments?
• It’s proactive! It’s meant to
inform a proposed policy,
program or project currently
under consideration
• It’s predictive! It uses data and
scientific literature to predict
potential health outcomes
(evidence – e.g. scientific
literature, reports, etc.)
• It’s translational! HIA is the
framework that translates data
and evidence into well-informed
policies.
The Sweet Spot!
Implementation of the Expanded
Gaming Act Legislation
Developing the process for
casino licensure
Developing regulatory
requirements for casino
development and operation
Oversee licensing process and
selection of Casino operators
5
8. HIA Methods
Six-Step Process
1. Screening
7
2. Scoping
3. Assessment
4.Recommendations
5. Reporting
6. Monitoring &
Evaluation
Assess value of HIA.
Define scope of assessment (e.g., which health impacts
to evaluate).
Determine how will decisions impact selected health
determinates and health outcomes
Determine how will decisions impact selected
health determinates and health outcomes
Communicate findings &
recommendations
Track impact of HIA and
decision
9. Western Massachusetts Casino Health Impact
Assessment (WMCHIA) - How will a casino impact
health in Western MA?
November 2011 - Chapter 194 “An Act Establishing Expanded
Gaming in the Commonwealth”
Allows “up to 3 destination resort casinos located in 3 geographically diverse regions”
8
10. Background
Proposed Casino Locations
Springfield
North End - Penn
Springfield
South End - MGM
W. Springfield-
Hard Rock Cafe
Palmer –
Mohegan Sun
• Springfield – urban, gateway city (pop 153,000)
• Palmer – rural (pop 12,000)
• West Springfield – suburban and rural (pop 28,000)
9
11. Background
Proposed Casino - Springfield
- Gateway city
- Struggling economy
- Majority community of
color
- Residents face numerous
socioeconomic challenges
and experience health
inequities
- Opportunity for economic
redevelopment
10
12. About WMCHIA
Conducted Spring 2013 – Fall 2013
Lead partners
Partners for a Healthier Community
Springfield Dept. of Health &
Human Services
UMass School of Public Health
Step 1: Screen
Determines value and need of HIA
Questions include…
Is HIA likely to add value?
Is it feasible?
Does decision-making process
allow for input from HIA?
11
13. WMCHIA Methods
Screening & Stakeholder Engagement
Advisory Committee
• Cross-sector stakeholders, HIA experts, casino/gambling experts, decision-makers
host community municipalities, state and local public health, social justice, planning
organizations, non-profit, faith community, police/public safety, immigrant services,
development, academics
Arise for Social Justice Massachusetts Department of Public Health Springfield Police Department (retired
chief)
Behavioral Health Network Massachusetts Gaming Commission Town of Palmer, Health Department
City of West Springfield, Health
Department
New North Citizens' Council Town of Palmer, Planning Department
Develop Springfield Palmer Town Council United Council of Churches of Greater
Springfield
Greater Springfield Chamber of
Commerce
Partners for Community/United Farm Workers United Way of Pioneer Valley
Holyoke Community College Pioneer Valley Planning Commission University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Irene E. And George A. Davis
Foundation
Regional Employment Board of Hampden
County
Western MassCOSH
Lutheran Social Services Springfield City Council Casino Site
Committee
12
14. WMCHIA Methods
Step 1: Screening & Stakeholder
Engagement
Introductory HIA workshop
Community forums
Online Survey
Stakeholder interviews & community
contacts
Media
WMCHIA web page
WMCHIA email list
Presentations to stakeholders
13
15. WMCHIA Goals
Step 1: Screening & Stakeholder
Engagement
1. Promote consideration of potential health impacts in decision-making related to the
licensing, site selection and development of a casino in Western MA, particularly
Host community agreement negotiations (if possible) and implementation
Casino operator applications
Host community public hearing
MA Gaming Commission licensing decisions and casino regulations
Planning for development of licensed casino
2. Recommend possible health or health-related indicators for the Gaming Commission’s
casino monitoring and evaluation plan
14
17. WMCHIA Methods
Step 2: Determining the Scope of WMCHIA
Interest from community in assessing impact on a range
of areas
Process for choosing health determinants and outcomes
in assessment
16
18. WMCHIA Focus Areas
Step 2: Determining the Scope of WMCHIA
• Topic areas
• Jobs and employment
• Access to local casino
gambling
• Traffic
• Crime and Public Safety
• Geographic location
• Focused on host community
impact and in some cases
region
• Other important concerns
not included
• Public safety capacity &
city infrastructure
• Economic development
• City/town revenue
• Housing
17
19. Step 2: Determining the Scope:
Jobs & Employment Pathway
Casino
Opens Resort casino jobs
Shiftwork
Social cohesion
w/family
Income
Quality and
access to
health
insurance
Smoking, gambling,
alcohol (risk
behaviors)**
Sleep disturbance
Chronic disease
Cancer
Mental health
Life expectancy
* Assessment focus is on impact of employment on unemployed
** Relates specifically to casino employees
Health Impacts
Decision
Initial Impact Pathway
Impact
Pathway
Impact
Employment (resort
casino jobs)*
18
20. Step 2: Determining the Scope:
Access to Local Casino Gambling Pathway
Casino
Opens
Access to
gambling Problem or
pathological
gambling
Health Impacts
Life
expectancy
Job loss and
financial
resources
Family
health/well-being
Cancer
Chronic
disease
Mental
health
Decision
Injuries
Access to health-promoting
resources
Suicide
Initial Impact Pathway
Impact
Pathway
Impact
Financial
resources
19
21. Step 2: Determining the Scope:
Traffic Pathway
Casino Opens
Traffic
Motor vehicle and
pedestrian accidents
Air pollution
Health Impacts
Motor vehicle & pedestrian
injuries and mortality
Asthma, CVD,
cancer
Decision
Initial Impact Pathway Impact
20
22. Step 2: Determining the Scope:
Crime & Public Safety Pathway
Casino
Opens
Alcohol use Driving under
the influence
Health Impacts
Chronic Disease
Injury and
mortality
Crime (actual and
perceived)
Mental health
Decision
Initial
Impact
Pathway
Impact
21
23. WMCHIA Methods
Step 3: Assessment
Assessment process is characterized by:
Expert input
Existing reports
Impacts - some quantitative but primarily
qualitative
Recommendations
Expert and stakeholder input
Based on best practice and local needs
22
24. WMCHIA Methods
Step 3: Assessment
Provides baseline data profile of health determinants and
conditions being evaluated
Evaluates potential health impacts
Uses scientific literature and other types of evidence to
identify potential impacts
What does literature say?
What is the strength of the evidence
Uses analytic methods and baseline data to predict
impact of decision on target population
23
26. WMCHIA Methods
Step 4: Recommendations
The Western Massachusetts Casino Health Impact
Assessment identified a number of potential positive and
negative effects, but its focus was on solutions and
recommended actions to strengthen the positives and
mitigate the negatives of casino development in Springfield.
Planned strategies (e.g. MGC, casino operator) that
community stakeholders thought was important to show
support for
Enhancement on planned strategy
Add-in new focus areas where no current plans
Recommendations are targeted to variety of stakeholders e.g.
MGC, casino operator, host community, state agencies
25
27. Step 4: Recommendations:
Predicted Impacts - Jobs and Employment
Casino would bring needed
local jobs given high
unemployment rate
Estimated 3,000 new jobs,
2,200 FT
~65% of casino jobs will require
H.S. diploma/GED
Casino Careers Training Institute
will train for new positions
Local hiring goals
Diversity goals
New jobs locally
-> improved health
61%
26
28. Step 4: Recommendations:
Predicted Impacts - Jobs and Employment
Challenges to meeting goals to improve local unemployment
Anticipated turnover rates of ~40%
Local and regional barriers to obtaining and retaining entry-level
positions prevent most in need of new jobs from obtaining
Workforce readiness capacity
Access to needed ABE and EOSL
Public transit service capacity
27
29. Step 4: Recommendations:
Predicted Impacts - Jobs and Employment
• Wages touted as high may not allow for self-sufficiency
Foxwoods Crossroads Casino Report - Average Wage by Category
Category of Position Average per capita wage Annual Cash Tips
and/or Casino Tokes
Total Average Per
Capita Wage
Executive/Director $189,331 -- $189,331
Management $67,418 -- $67,418
Skilled Salary & Supervisory $53,583 -- $53,583
Hourly, Casino Tokes $17,374 $31,124 $48,498
Hourly, Cash Tips $18,388 $21,856 $40,244
Line Level and Administrative $29,806 -- $29,806
• 28% would be estimated to be line level and administrative
support – this does not meet family economic self-sufficiency
standards – 2 parents family (1 parent working
full-time) with 2 kids residing in Greater Springfield
28
30. Step 4: Recommendations:
Predicted Impacts - Jobs and Employment
Casino employees may experience negative health impacts
Casino employees found to have higher prevalence of health risk
behaviors
Shift-work found to negatively impact health
Gaming Employees Non-Gaming Employees
Hours Percent Hours Percent
5:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. 20% 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. 20%
1:00 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. 40% 4:00 p.m. – 12:00 p.m. 60%
9:00 p.m. – 5:00 a.m. 40% 12:00 p.m. – 8:00 a.m. 20%
Source: Casino Careers Training Institute
29
31. Step 4: Recommendations:
Predicted Impacts - Jobs and Employment
Casino operator plan to reach targeted local hiring levels given
documented regional workforce barriers
Infrastructure funding for regional cross-sector collaboration to
address workforce barriers
Casino operator
Health and wellness programs
Best practices to reduce impacts of shiftwork
Employment indicator monitoring and reporting – diversity/equity,
where hired from, etc.
30
32. Step 4: Recommendations:
Predicted Impacts - Access to Local Casino Gambling &
Disordered Gambling
Likely increase problem
gambling prevalence with
casino (estimated 30%)
Many vulnerable populations
in Springfield would be at
increased risk
Young people
Communities of color
Low-income individuals
Limited community capacity
to prevent/address problem
gambling
Problem and Pathological Gamblers
Geography Current After Casino
Opens - Initial
(~1 year)
After Casino Opens -
Over Time
(~5 years)
Springfield 3,993 5,191 3,993
Hampden
County
12,114 15,748 12,114
31
33. Step 4: Recommendations:
Predicted Impacts - Access to Local Casino Gambling &
Disordered Gambling
Public Health Trust Fund funding to create infrastructure for
regional cross-sector collaboration to address increases in
problem gambling
Public awareness campaign
Targeted campaigns and strategies to vulnerable populations that
are accessible (e.g. culturally competent, appropriate literacy
level)
Casino implement responsible gambling framework
32
34. Step 4: Recommendations
Predicted Impacts – Traffic
Estimated 15-30,000 new vehicle
trips per day
Potential adversely affect the City’s
many residents living in EJ areas
High hospitalization rates for
diseases affected by air pollution –
asthma, CVD, COPD
Large racial/ethnic disparities
33
35. Step 4: Recommendations
Predicted Impacts – Traffic
• Greatest health impact likely due
to near roadway air pollution
– Latinos experiencing disparities
and live along likely casino routes
and most likely to be impacted
• May be impact in traffic related
collisions due to traffic increase
34
36. Step 4: Recommendations
Predicted Impacts – Traffic
Funding to create infrastructure for regional cross-sector
collaboration to address increases in traffic
Promote use of public transportation and alternative methods of
transport
Assess impact of near roadway pollution on vulnerable
populations and develop strategies to mitigate harms
35
37. Step 4: Recommendations
Predicted Impacts – Crime & Safety
• Uncertain the extent crime will
increase
– Literature conflicting
– Factors impacting
• Community preparedness
• Community design
• DUIs and alcohol-related fatalities may increase with accessibility
to free alcohol at casinos
– Expanded Gaming Act allows for free alcohol on gaming floor b/t
8:00 a.m. – 2:00 a.m.
36
38. Step 4: Recommendations
Predicted Impacts – Crime & Safety
Community design strategies to prevent crime and enhance
perception of safety
City should support and complement casino operator proposed
design elements
Strategies to prevent DUIs
Public health campaign
Expanded sobriety checks, etc.
37
39. Step 4: Recommendations
General Findings
Integrating resort casino plans with those of other initiatives has the
best potential to address existing regional needs
Large existing health inequities in Hampden County and Springfield
could be reduced or exacerbated by impacts of a casino depending on
strategies implemented
Data-driven evaluation and modification of activities to ensure that
stated goals are achieved, including
1. Publicly available casino impact data
2. Periodic evaluation of impact on identified existing regional needs and health
equity areas by multi-sector stakeholder groups
3. Modifications of strategies and plans as needed
4. Reallocation of money to fund modified strategies
38
41. WMCHIA Reporting
Involved key stakeholders in review
process
MGC, SEIGMA, MGM, etc.
General dissemination
Email blast, press release, etc.
Presentations
Key decision-makers: MGC, MGC
staff, Springfield Mayor
Other key stakeholders
Problem-gambling groups (WMCGA,
MA Council Compulsive Gambling,
local problem gambling panel)
Local outreach worker group
Others
MAPC – examining surrounding
community impacts
MPHA Policy Subcommittee- deciding
whether to take position on upcoming
ballot questions
40
42. Step 6: WMCHIA Impacts
MA Gaming Commission and University of Massachusetts, School of Public
Health and Health Sciences (SEIGMA - Social and Economic Impacts of Gaming
in Massachusetts )
Health Equity lens for evidence-based research that includes community voice;
Support for implementation activities – e.g. responsible gaming framework
information on certain indicators
Springfield Mayor - considering adoption of recommendations and using it to
advocate for funding to implement recommendations
Community residents and organizations
Local neighborhood council reviewed report to understand impacts and identify
recs for advocacy
Gardening the Community used info in WMCHIA to successfully apply for
funding
WMCHIA recs used to support advocacy for MGM to purchase from local small
farmer cooperative
41
43. Step 6: Monitoring Impacts (Context –
Uncertainty)
• Impacts on decision-making
processes and
decision
• Impacts of decision on
health determinants
42
44. Devens Grant Road Redevelopment
Regulations Health Impact Assessment
Peter Lowitt, FAICP
Sang Cho
Neil Angus, AICP, LEED AP
SNEAPA
October, 2014
46. Regional Background
• Neighboring towns:
Harvard, Shirley, Lancaster
and Ayer
• Fort Devens located on
Route 2, just outside
Boston’s second beltway
ring – I-495
• Rural character typical of
Massachusetts outside
Boston influence still
exists in this area
• Excellent transportation
access including Heavy
Rail and Commuter Rail
48. The purpose/function of HIA is to:
• Inform and influence the decision maker
• Help address inequalities in health
• Place public health on the agenda
• Reduce conflict between stakeholders
• Encourage sustainable development
HIA is an approach that gets people to think about what they are
doing and how it may alter people’s health. It promotes health-and
in the long term contributes to the health of local
population.
49. HIA Methodology
• Screening
• Scoping
• Assessment
1. How will it be done?
2. Community Participation
3. The Study Area
4. Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System data
5. Analytic Method
• Reporting
50. Process
• Literature review
• Consultation with HGSD and HSPH faculty and
graduate students
• Invitation to community and professionals to
participate
• Development of background materials and
two mock development scenarios, handouts,
HIA checklist, and workshop schedule
51. 120 Unit Development Scenario #1 (30 acres)
Com
Gdn
Housing Mix: 30 single family 16 single fam. cottage 16 two-family 28 – multi-family
(#of units) 30 multi-family (9x 3-4 units)
(4x 6-12 units)
Park
Park
ComGdn
63. Recommendations
• Introduce traffic calming measures to reduce speeds
• Install Rotary at intersection of Grant, Pine and Hospital Roads
• Use architecture to assure privacy and access to green space is available
on all lots
• Incentivize community gardens and have plots available for employees
and neighboring communities
• Support measures to introduce shuttles to commuter rail line to support
increased transit use
• Support existing food pantry serving healthy foods
• Provide nutrition classes for residents and offer classes on gardening
• Attract residents from surrounding communities onto Devens through
courses, programming and educational events
• Organize community walks and other events that promote healthy
lifestyles
64. For more information:
• A pdf of the Grant Road Redevelopment
Regulations HIA is available at
www.devensec.com/news.html
• Contact: Peter Lowitt, FAICP, peterlowitt@devensec.com
• SangCho@devensec.com
• Neilangus@devensec.com
65. Health Impact Assessments:
What Roles Can a Regional
Planning Agency Play?
Presented at SNEAPA 2014
Thursday, October 23
Molly Goren-Watts, Principal Planner/Manager
Regional Information & Policy Center
Pioneer Valley Planning Commission
66. Lead or Provide
Technical Assistance
All HIAs need technical expertise, topic knowledge, and
community connections and engagement.
Model 1 – Lead with technical expertise. Engage partners for
topic knowledge and/or community connections as needed.
Model 2 – Provide technical expertise to community research
partner (expert in specific field or community organization
facing the question at hand)
Model 3 – Conduct HIA as partnership led by RPA and one or
more topic or community-specific organizations.
67. PVPC Participation in
Casino HIA
•Partners for a Healthier Community was lead.
• As RPA to all three proposed host communities, PVPC had to remain
neutral in fact and appearance to all communities involved.
•PVPC provided:
•Data collection and understanding data sources
•Mapping
•Topic area specialists – traffic, transit, land use, economic
development (for analysis and proofing of recommendations)
•Networking/Connecting with other specialists in the region
(city/town government, workforce development agencies (REB),
police department, transit authority, others doing related work for
stakeholder engagement)
•Analytical assistance such as review of pathway diagrams
68. PVPC Roles in Other HIAs
•Overall Management
•Literature review
•Analysis and writing
••Stakeholder engagement