SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
Prosecution Lunch August 2010
All Ohio Annual Institute on IP ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
U.S. crackdown on piracy, counterfeit goods ,[object Object],[object Object]
Foreign TM Searching- tmview.europa.eu
Marks & Clerk – CTM app. sale ,[object Object],[object Object]
Visa International Service Association v. JSL Corp. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Bilski v. Kappos  - USPTO Interim Guidelines ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Bilski v. Kappos  - USPTO Interim Guidelines
Bilski v. Kappos  - USPTO Interim Guidelines
Bilski v. Kappos  - USPTO Interim Guidelines ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Section 101 Update ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Section 101 Update ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
PTO Notes ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
What’s Your Function? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Patentability of Genes Questioned ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
APPEAL PRACTICE IN THE USPTO ,[object Object]

More Related Content

Similar to August 2010 prosecution lunch

Roy Issac AIPLA Presentation
Roy Issac AIPLA PresentationRoy Issac AIPLA Presentation
Roy Issac AIPLA PresentationRoy Issac
 
Bulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&ED
Bulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&EDBulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&ED
Bulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&EDScitax Advisory Partners LP
 
Patents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be InfringedPatents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be Infringedblewisbell
 
Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?
Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?
Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?Scitax Advisory Partners LP
 
USPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS Bank
USPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS BankUSPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS Bank
USPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS BankUSPatentsNMore
 
2009 Nciia Presentation
2009 Nciia Presentation2009 Nciia Presentation
2009 Nciia Presentationthe nciia
 
Software Patent Issues
Software Patent IssuesSoftware Patent Issues
Software Patent IssuesTroy Adkins
 
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]Lawrence Kass
 
USPTO patent 13573002 final rejection response
USPTO patent 13573002 final rejection responseUSPTO patent 13573002 final rejection response
USPTO patent 13573002 final rejection responseSteven McGee
 
Doctrine of equivalants
Doctrine of equivalantsDoctrine of equivalants
Doctrine of equivalantsAltacit Global
 
Willful Patent Infringement
Willful Patent InfringementWillful Patent Infringement
Willful Patent Infringementprofberry
 
June 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 NewsletterJune 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 Newsletterkhorton123
 
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015Mark Gober
 
BNA Inter Partes Reexamination
BNA Inter Partes ReexaminationBNA Inter Partes Reexamination
BNA Inter Partes Reexaminationpmrivard
 

Similar to August 2010 prosecution lunch (20)

Business Method Patents
Business Method PatentsBusiness Method Patents
Business Method Patents
 
Roy Issac AIPLA Presentation
Roy Issac AIPLA PresentationRoy Issac AIPLA Presentation
Roy Issac AIPLA Presentation
 
Bulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&ED
Bulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&EDBulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&ED
Bulletin #57 - New TCC Ruling Favours Taxpayer on "Shop Floor" SR&ED
 
Patents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be InfringedPatents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be Infringed
 
Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?
Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?
Bulletin #46 - Significant New Tax Court Canada Ruling on SR&ED?
 
USPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS Bank
USPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS BankUSPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS Bank
USPTO Examiner Guidelines Post - Alice v. CLS Bank
 
2009 Nciia Presentation
2009 Nciia Presentation2009 Nciia Presentation
2009 Nciia Presentation
 
Software Patent Issues
Software Patent IssuesSoftware Patent Issues
Software Patent Issues
 
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
 
USPTO patent 13573002 final rejection response
USPTO patent 13573002 final rejection responseUSPTO patent 13573002 final rejection response
USPTO patent 13573002 final rejection response
 
Doctrine of equivalants
Doctrine of equivalantsDoctrine of equivalants
Doctrine of equivalants
 
Software patents
Software patents Software patents
Software patents
 
Willful Patent Infringement
Willful Patent InfringementWillful Patent Infringement
Willful Patent Infringement
 
June 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 NewsletterJune 2010 Newsletter
June 2010 Newsletter
 
Thesis For Evaluation Essay
Thesis For Evaluation EssayThesis For Evaluation Essay
Thesis For Evaluation Essay
 
How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc
How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after UnilocHow to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc
How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc
 
Trademark Prosecution Lunch June 2011
Trademark Prosecution Lunch June 2011Trademark Prosecution Lunch June 2011
Trademark Prosecution Lunch June 2011
 
Aiplapaper
AiplapaperAiplapaper
Aiplapaper
 
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
 
BNA Inter Partes Reexamination
BNA Inter Partes ReexaminationBNA Inter Partes Reexamination
BNA Inter Partes Reexamination
 

More from Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP

More from Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP (20)

2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
2017 08-patent prosecution lunch2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
 
Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark LawRecent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
 
2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
February 2017 Patent Prosecution Lunch
February 2017 Patent Prosecution LunchFebruary 2017 Patent Prosecution Lunch
February 2017 Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
Alice Corp Update 2016 Cases
Alice Corp Update 2016 CasesAlice Corp Update 2016 Cases
Alice Corp Update 2016 Cases
 
2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
Review of Recent IP Supreme Court Cases
Review of Recent IP Supreme Court CasesReview of Recent IP Supreme Court Cases
Review of Recent IP Supreme Court Cases
 
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
 
July 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch Update
July 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch UpdateJuly 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch Update
July 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch Update
 
2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
Federal Rules Update
Federal Rules UpdateFederal Rules Update
Federal Rules Update
 
January 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch
January 2016  Trademark Prosecution LunchJanuary 2016  Trademark Prosecution Lunch
January 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch
 
In re tam presentation
In re tam presentationIn re tam presentation
In re tam presentation
 
January 2016 Patent Prosecution Lunch
January 2016 Patent Prosecution LunchJanuary 2016 Patent Prosecution Lunch
January 2016 Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
International Copyright Protection Primer
International Copyright Protection PrimerInternational Copyright Protection Primer
International Copyright Protection Primer
 
2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch
2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch 2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch
2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
CLE - Introduction to IP Law
CLE - Introduction to IP LawCLE - Introduction to IP Law
CLE - Introduction to IP Law
 
August 2015 Patent Prosecution Lunch
August 2015 Patent Prosecution LunchAugust 2015 Patent Prosecution Lunch
August 2015 Patent Prosecution Lunch
 

August 2010 prosecution lunch