This document is an affirmation submitted in opposition to a motion to dismiss a second-degree murder charge. The affirmation argues that (1) the defense motion left out key facts, including that the defendant retrieved a shotgun with intent to harm the victim; (2) the defendant was aware a confrontation could occur; and (3) others tried to separate the defendant and victim due to the uncomfortable situation. For these reasons, the affirmation requests that the court deny the motion to dismiss the second-degree murder charge.
J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Delhi High Court Order on Privacy and Confidentiality of Victim in Media
HAQ: Centre for Child Rights
B1/2, GF, Malviya Nagar
New Delhi - 110049
Email - info@haqcrc.org
Website - www.haqcrc.org
J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY J JOHN SEBASTIAN ATTORNEY
Delhi High Court Order on Privacy and Confidentiality of Victim in Media
HAQ: Centre for Child Rights
B1/2, GF, Malviya Nagar
New Delhi - 110049
Email - info@haqcrc.org
Website - www.haqcrc.org
Former state water official files federal civil rights lawsuit against Las Ve...This Is Reno
Robert Coache has applied to receive an official exoneration by the State of Nevada after serving time in prison for crimes the Nevada Supreme Court later dismissed for lack of evidence. Whether he is granted that status, however, remains to be seen.
Coache, who spent 16 months in prison, could be eligible for $50,000 a year for each year served, under a 2019 law passed by the Nevada legislature.
It’s a drop in the bucket compared with the $5 million in damages he is now seeking in a federal civil rights lawsuit filed against Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (LVMPD) and the Clark County District Attorney’s Office.
Coache faced 49 charges, “spent over sixteen months in prison and was on parole for conspiracy to commit extortion by public officer or employee, extortion by public officer or employee, conspiracy to commit asking or receiving bribe by public officer, asking, or receiving bribe by public officer, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and forty-four counts of money laundering,” his attorneys said.
The Nevada Supreme Court in 2019 dismissed the 49 charges against him citing lack of evidence.
Sharon Logan FWV021176 felony embezzlement plea 10-24-2001.pdfTina Marie Trujillo
This is the court docket for the second of six financial felony convictions we've discovered for Sharon Jean Logan, who owns the nonprofit Paw Protectors and seeks donations. Logan embezzled from an Ontario, California employer, SCS Personnel. At the time Logan made her plea, she was already in prison for embezzling $250,000 from another employer, Hanover Commercial Services in Riverside. Logan would go on to commit five more financial crimes, four of them felonies, two of which were against employers in Orange County.
Case Brief InstructionsYou will prepare a Case Brief on th.docxmichelljubborjudd
Case Brief Instructions
You will prepare a Case Brief on the provided judicial opinion regarding a criminal justice topic included below , CAVITT v. STATE. DO NOT USE INFORMATION FROM THE CASE BRIEF SAMPLE. The judicial opinion that you will prepare a Case Brief on can be found below. The Case Brief must include the following sections: Caption, Facts, Procedural History, Issue, Rule of Law, Holding, and Rationale. The Case Brief must be 1 page. A heading must be provided for each section of the Case Brief. Save your work as a Microsoft Word document and review the Sample Case Brief provided below.
CAVITT v. STATE Miss. 1199 Cite as 159 So.3d 1199 (Miss.App. 2015) preme court’s notation in Bounds, Bounds asserts that the judge, not the jury, set his sentence at life in prison. Id. Hence, he claims that the imposition of a life sentence by the circuit court judge created an illegal sentence that defeats the statute of limitations on his appeal. ¶ 3. In its order dated January 7, 2014, the circuit court summarily dismissed Bounds’s PCR motion—in part because Bounds failed to seek leave from the supreme court to file the PCR motion and in part because the circuit court found that his case is not excepted from the statute of limitations. On January 21, 2014, Bounds, having reviewed the circuit court’s order, filed a motion for leave from the supreme court to proceed with his PCR motion. On January 27, 2014, Bounds filed the instant appeal. Nonetheless, on June 25, 2014, the supreme court denied Bounds’s request for leave, stating: In the application for leave before this panel, Bounds merely states that his sentence was illegal. He offers no argument and does not support his contention. Bounds’s conviction and sentence were affirmed by this Court, and the mandate issued in 1972. Accordingly, we find that Bounds has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a state or federal right, and his application for leave should be dismissed as timebarred. Despite the supreme court’s denial of Bounds’s motion for leave to proceed with his PCR motion, Bounds has continued in his appeal of the matter. DISCUSSION [1, 2] ¶ 4. Mississippi law requires that a movant must obtain permission from the supreme court to file a PCR motion in a circuit court if the movant’s conviction has been affirmed by the appellate court on direct appeal or if the direct appeal has been dismissed. Miss.Code Ann. § 99–39– 7 (Supp.2014). ‘‘This procedure is not merely advisory, but jurisdictional.’’ Bownes v. State, 963 So.2d 1277, 1278 (¶ 3) (Miss.Ct.App.2007) (citation omitted). We have consistently held that when a movant fails to obtain the requisite permission from the supreme court, all other courts lack the jurisdiction necessary to review the movant’s PCR motion. See Doss v. State, 757 So.2d 1016, 1017 (¶ 7) (Miss.Ct. App.2000); Bownes, 963 So.2d at 1279 (¶ 4). Accordingly, both the circuit court and this Court are without jurisdiction to review Bounds’s appeal. As ...
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense CounselThomas (Tom) Jasper
Military Commissions Trial Judiciary, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Notice of the Chief Defense Counsel's detailing of LtCol Thomas F. Jasper, Jr. USMC, as Detailed Defense Counsel for Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi on 6 August 2014 in the case of United States v. Hadi al Iraqi (10026)
Military Commissions details LtCol Thomas Jasper as Detailed Defense Counsel
Attorney affidavit week 7 final
1. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
People of NewYork;KevinSpliterADA
Dismissal of Murderinthe SecondDegree
Plaintiff DEFENDANTS’AFFIRMATION Plaintiffs, IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’MOTION
vs.
Christoph Blume
AmyReddingAttorneyforDefense
Defendant
Index No.159617/2020
AmyRedding,anattorneydulylicensedtopractice before the Courtsof the
State of NewYork,herebyaffirmsthe truthof the followingunderthe penaltiesof perjury:
1. I am an AssistantDistrictAttorney; Iam familiarwiththe factsand
circumstances of thiscase.
2. This Affirmationissubmittedinoppositionto Defendant, ChristophBlumeMotiontoDismissthe 2nd
Degree MurderCharge
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/16/2020 03:46 PM INDEXNO.159617/2013 NYSCEF DOC.NO. 51
RECEIVED NYSCEF:06/16/2020
HURWITZ & FINE,P.C.1300 LIBERTY BUILDING BUFFALO,NEW YORK 14202 2
3. Defendants motionmustbe deniedatthistime because:(1) DefendantmotiontoDismissSecond
Degree MurderCharge.Didnot include all the factswithinthiscase. The defense leftoutthe factthat
he walkedintothe house wentupstairsintohisbedroomandretrievedhis12-gauge shotgunwiththe
intenttodo great bodilyharmtoStephonArcher.
4. DefendantknowStephonArcherswascomingtothe gathering. He waswell aware of what could
happenduringhisvisit. There were numerous incidentsbetweenthe twoandalcohol alwaysmade it
worse.
5. Guestsat the party beganleaving due tothe uncomfortable situation
2. 6. Lori Blume triedto separate herhusbandand botherseveral timesduringthe night priortothe fatal
shooting.
7. This office believesthatalcohol playedabigpart inthis incident,jealousy,andemotional issues.
WHEREFORE, it isrespectfullyrequestedthatthisHonorable Courtdeny
Plaintiffs’motion todismissthe second-degreemurdercharge.
DATED: June 16, 2020 Buffalo,NewYork
______________________
KevinSpliterAssistantDistrictAttorney 1300
LibertyBuilding Buffalo,New York14202
(716) 849-8900
