SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
The Middle Latency Response in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder
Janice Yi and Deborah Moncrieff, Ph.D. Department of Communication
Science and Disorders
First Experiences in Research, Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences, University of Pittsburgh
Introduction Results
Conclusions
Methods
• With the waveforms of the grand averages, there
is a correlation of WNL being between AMB+ and
AMB.
• The evoked responses from the left and right
ears were indeed more asymmetrical in children
with APD.
• AMB could be recognized from analysis of Na
amplitude.
• Subjects are given initial hearing test along
with several dichotic listening tests.
• Each subject is later fitted to an EEG electrode
cap (figure 1, pictured to the right).
• C4, CZ, and C3 are the three focused electrode
sites.
• Clicks are presented to the right ear, the left
ear, then both ears. Each click is presented at a
rate of 9/sec at 60 dB nHL. Responses will be
recorded for 1000 sweeps at a time for each
ear twice.
Objective
• The goal of the study is to characterize the effects
of a binaural integration deficit on latency and
amplitude measures of the middle latency response
(MLR).
• It is hypothesized that evoked responses from the
left and right ears will be more asymmetrical in
children with binaural integration deficits than in
control children.
• Everyday our ears are put in competition when
different stimuli arrive simultaneously. Binaural
integration is the auditory processing skill that
enables correct processing and integration of
information for listening and learning.
• Children are the targeted subjects because early
detection of binaural integration deficit and
intervention with the proper treatment will lessen
communication and learning difficulties and
strengthen their performance in school.
• Electrophysiology is used to measure and compare
neural transmissions through auditory pathways in
children with and without binaural integration
deficits.
Fig.1
References
Keith, Robert W. (1999). Clinical Issues in Central
Auditory Processing Disorders. American Speech-
Language-Hearing Association (Vol. 30, pp. 339-343)
Fig 1,
https://gtecmedical.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gte
c_eeg_bci_5438_medsize.jpg
Fig. 2 (left) Waveforms of
the grand averages of the
left ear from all diagnoses.
Fig. 5 Peak-to-Peak amplitude of each ear by diagnoses
Peak-to-peak amplitude is the excursion from Na to Pa,
and both ears resulted in high significance. Typically
the right ear performs better than the left ear so it was
expected for the left ear to not perform as well and for
a much higher error bar, which represents more
variability of amplitude.
Group Na Amplitude
(left ear)
Na Amplitude
(right ear)
WNL 0.390 0.550
AMB 0.901 0.378
AMB+ 0.531 0.494
Group Peak-to-Peak
Amplitude (left
ear)
Peak-to-Peak
Amplitude (right
ear)
WNL 1.004 1.235
AMB 1.714 0.951
AMB+ 1.274 0.901
(l) F(2,63) = 3.023 p=0.056
(r) F(2,63) = 3.148 p=0.050
ms
-10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
µV 0.0
0.3
0.5
0.8
1.0
-0.3
-0.5
-0.8
-1.0
*GA_WNL_left_fast_F.avg
GA_AMB_left_fast_F.avg
GA_AMB+_left_fast_F.avg
Electrode: C4
Subject:
EEG file: GA_WNL_left_fast_F.avg
Rate - 10000 Hz, HPF - 10 Hz, LPF - 2000 Hz, Notch - 60 Hz
Neuroscan
SCAN 4.5
Printed : 14:21:53 14-Apr-2015
ms
-10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
µV 0.0
0.3
0.5
0.8
1.0
-0.3
-0.5
-0.8
-1.0
*GA_WNL_right_fast_F.avg
GA_AMB_right_fast_F.avg
GA_AMB+_right_fast_F.avg
Electrode: C3
Subject:
EEG file: GA_WNL_right_fast_F.avg
Rate - 10000 Hz, HPF - 10 Hz, LPF - 2000 Hz, Notch - 60 Hz
Neuroscan
SCAN 4.5
Printed : 14:22:54 14
Fig. 4 (lower left) Na
amplitude in left ear by
diagnoses.
There are significant
differences in Na
amplitude of the left ear
compared to the right ear.
Children with AMB have a
much lower amplitude,
while control and AMB+
are in similar ranges.
F(2,63)=4.172
p= 0.020
Fig. 3 (right) Waveforms
of the grand averages of
the right ear from all
diagnoses.

More Related Content

Similar to april presentation

Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06
Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06
Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06
MonikaLehnhardt
 
poster_4_1
poster_4_1poster_4_1
poster_4_1
宁 梅
 

Similar to april presentation (20)

Selective Attention Paper
Selective Attention PaperSelective Attention Paper
Selective Attention Paper
 
Lecture 2 d instrumentation used in the measurement of acoustic signals and a...
Lecture 2 d instrumentation used in the measurement of acoustic signals and a...Lecture 2 d instrumentation used in the measurement of acoustic signals and a...
Lecture 2 d instrumentation used in the measurement of acoustic signals and a...
 
Middle ear myoclonus
Middle ear myoclonusMiddle ear myoclonus
Middle ear myoclonus
 
DURF (Dell'Aquila) v4
DURF  (Dell'Aquila) v4DURF  (Dell'Aquila) v4
DURF (Dell'Aquila) v4
 
ApresentaçãoFebruary2020.pptx
ApresentaçãoFebruary2020.pptxApresentaçãoFebruary2020.pptx
ApresentaçãoFebruary2020.pptx
 
Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...
Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...
Current trends in audiological practices and implications for developing coun...
 
Central Auditory Function: Willeford Test Battery
Central Auditory Function: Willeford Test BatteryCentral Auditory Function: Willeford Test Battery
Central Auditory Function: Willeford Test Battery
 
BAA talk
BAA talkBAA talk
BAA talk
 
Assessment of hearing
Assessment of hearingAssessment of hearing
Assessment of hearing
 
Comparison of 500Hz Tonebursts and 500Hz octave Chirps for Cervical vestibula...
Comparison of 500Hz Tonebursts and 500Hz octave Chirps for Cervical vestibula...Comparison of 500Hz Tonebursts and 500Hz octave Chirps for Cervical vestibula...
Comparison of 500Hz Tonebursts and 500Hz octave Chirps for Cervical vestibula...
 
Audiovisual integration in auditory cortex of CI users measured by fNIRS
Audiovisual integration in auditory cortex of CI users measured by fNIRSAudiovisual integration in auditory cortex of CI users measured by fNIRS
Audiovisual integration in auditory cortex of CI users measured by fNIRS
 
Brain structural connectivity and functional default mode network in deafness
Brain structural connectivity and functional default mode network in deafnessBrain structural connectivity and functional default mode network in deafness
Brain structural connectivity and functional default mode network in deafness
 
BINAURAL BEATS IN IMPAIRED COCHLEA
BINAURAL BEATS IN IMPAIRED COCHLEABINAURAL BEATS IN IMPAIRED COCHLEA
BINAURAL BEATS IN IMPAIRED COCHLEA
 
APD Presentation
APD PresentationAPD Presentation
APD Presentation
 
cochlear implant [Autosaved].pptx
cochlear implant [Autosaved].pptxcochlear implant [Autosaved].pptx
cochlear implant [Autosaved].pptx
 
Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06
Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06
Highlights of xxxi World Congress of Audiology-eng 2012-05-06
 
Dr. Dr. h.c. Monika Lehnhardt - Highlights of xxxi world congress of audiolog...
Dr. Dr. h.c. Monika Lehnhardt - Highlights of xxxi world congress of audiolog...Dr. Dr. h.c. Monika Lehnhardt - Highlights of xxxi world congress of audiolog...
Dr. Dr. h.c. Monika Lehnhardt - Highlights of xxxi world congress of audiolog...
 
Kumar2011
Kumar2011Kumar2011
Kumar2011
 
Alewel_poster
Alewel_posterAlewel_poster
Alewel_poster
 
poster_4_1
poster_4_1poster_4_1
poster_4_1
 

april presentation

  • 1. The Middle Latency Response in Children with Auditory Processing Disorder Janice Yi and Deborah Moncrieff, Ph.D. Department of Communication Science and Disorders First Experiences in Research, Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Introduction Results Conclusions Methods • With the waveforms of the grand averages, there is a correlation of WNL being between AMB+ and AMB. • The evoked responses from the left and right ears were indeed more asymmetrical in children with APD. • AMB could be recognized from analysis of Na amplitude. • Subjects are given initial hearing test along with several dichotic listening tests. • Each subject is later fitted to an EEG electrode cap (figure 1, pictured to the right). • C4, CZ, and C3 are the three focused electrode sites. • Clicks are presented to the right ear, the left ear, then both ears. Each click is presented at a rate of 9/sec at 60 dB nHL. Responses will be recorded for 1000 sweeps at a time for each ear twice. Objective • The goal of the study is to characterize the effects of a binaural integration deficit on latency and amplitude measures of the middle latency response (MLR). • It is hypothesized that evoked responses from the left and right ears will be more asymmetrical in children with binaural integration deficits than in control children. • Everyday our ears are put in competition when different stimuli arrive simultaneously. Binaural integration is the auditory processing skill that enables correct processing and integration of information for listening and learning. • Children are the targeted subjects because early detection of binaural integration deficit and intervention with the proper treatment will lessen communication and learning difficulties and strengthen their performance in school. • Electrophysiology is used to measure and compare neural transmissions through auditory pathways in children with and without binaural integration deficits. Fig.1 References Keith, Robert W. (1999). Clinical Issues in Central Auditory Processing Disorders. American Speech- Language-Hearing Association (Vol. 30, pp. 339-343) Fig 1, https://gtecmedical.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/gte c_eeg_bci_5438_medsize.jpg Fig. 2 (left) Waveforms of the grand averages of the left ear from all diagnoses. Fig. 5 Peak-to-Peak amplitude of each ear by diagnoses Peak-to-peak amplitude is the excursion from Na to Pa, and both ears resulted in high significance. Typically the right ear performs better than the left ear so it was expected for the left ear to not perform as well and for a much higher error bar, which represents more variability of amplitude. Group Na Amplitude (left ear) Na Amplitude (right ear) WNL 0.390 0.550 AMB 0.901 0.378 AMB+ 0.531 0.494 Group Peak-to-Peak Amplitude (left ear) Peak-to-Peak Amplitude (right ear) WNL 1.004 1.235 AMB 1.714 0.951 AMB+ 1.274 0.901 (l) F(2,63) = 3.023 p=0.056 (r) F(2,63) = 3.148 p=0.050 ms -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 µV 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 -0.3 -0.5 -0.8 -1.0 *GA_WNL_left_fast_F.avg GA_AMB_left_fast_F.avg GA_AMB+_left_fast_F.avg Electrode: C4 Subject: EEG file: GA_WNL_left_fast_F.avg Rate - 10000 Hz, HPF - 10 Hz, LPF - 2000 Hz, Notch - 60 Hz Neuroscan SCAN 4.5 Printed : 14:21:53 14-Apr-2015 ms -10.0 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 µV 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 -0.3 -0.5 -0.8 -1.0 *GA_WNL_right_fast_F.avg GA_AMB_right_fast_F.avg GA_AMB+_right_fast_F.avg Electrode: C3 Subject: EEG file: GA_WNL_right_fast_F.avg Rate - 10000 Hz, HPF - 10 Hz, LPF - 2000 Hz, Notch - 60 Hz Neuroscan SCAN 4.5 Printed : 14:22:54 14 Fig. 4 (lower left) Na amplitude in left ear by diagnoses. There are significant differences in Na amplitude of the left ear compared to the right ear. Children with AMB have a much lower amplitude, while control and AMB+ are in similar ranges. F(2,63)=4.172 p= 0.020 Fig. 3 (right) Waveforms of the grand averages of the right ear from all diagnoses.