9/11 CONSPIRACY THEORIES Top 8 Conspiracy Claims and Why They are Wrong
WTC Controlled Demolitions    Bombs Seismic Spikes   WTC 7 collapse Fire cannot cause collapse Early Flash Severe damage Steel frame failure No bomb fragments Fires assisted by structural failure Pictures and videos of planes Believer Perspective Debunking
 
MQ-4 Global Hawk No windows on planes “ Commercial” planes were in gray military livery Plane Was Not a Commercial Airliner 767 does not resemble MQ-4 No clear side views of planes Missing planes/people United livery visible Believer Perspective Debunking
LEFT: United Airlines 767 before crashing into the WTC. BELOW: United Airlines 767 in 2001 livery. Boeing 767  RQ-4
Al Qaeda Not Responsible   Tapes faked Polls Population in Al Qaeda innocence Tapes sent by Bin Laden Polls Hasty generalization Believer Perspective Debunking
Example of a Poll
WTC Hit by Missile    Plane launched missile Missile attached to plane Early flash Frame-by-frame “ Pods” part of all 767s Believer Perspective Debunking
No explosion before impact. Frame 1 Frame 2 Frame 3 Frame-by-frame shows small explosion upon impact, not before . #1: Two pods #2: A bulge #3: The missile itself Conspiracy  Theorists’ Interpretation “ Bulge” is actually landing gear housing. “ Pods” are present on a clear view of a United 767. “ Pods” “ Missile” is a standard protrusion on all 767s.
U.S. Military Responsible    USAF plane hit WTC and/or Pentagon U.S. missile No air support Planes’ paint schemes not USAF Pictures of planes Lack of contingency plans Inefficient communications Believer Perspective Debunking
Single tail fin American Airlines Flight 11 RQ-4 Global Hawk Dual tail fin United Airlines Flight 175 United Two-Tone Paint Scheme United “U” Tail Logo Note: Military aircraft have a one-tone white or gray paint scheme.
Pentagon Hit by Missile    Tomahawk missile  No plane visible Not all security camera footage released No missile contrails Tail partially visible Classified security footage Plane parts found Believer Perspective Debunking
Pentagon Case Study Video   
Flight 93 Shot Down    Scattered debris Small pieces of debris Retired Lt. Col. says F-16 shot down Flight 93 Flying debris upon impact F-16 pilot was nowhere near crash site Believer Perspective Debunking
 
Flight 93 Staged    Flight 93 landed safely Debris was placed Explosives used to make crater Plane emergency lands at KCLE @ 10:10, UAL93 passed KCLE @ ~9:35 Witnesses Response within 30 min. Black box/cockpit recordings Phone calls Believer Perspective Debunking
KCLE Piece of UAL93 debris 2001 United Paint Scheme
Conclusion Based on available facts and evidence, we have concluded that 9/11 was not a government conspiracy Most conspiracy theories have a plausible explanation that debunks them Many conspiracy theorists overanalyze available information

9/11 Conspiracy Theroies

  • 1.
    9/11 CONSPIRACY THEORIESTop 8 Conspiracy Claims and Why They are Wrong
  • 2.
    WTC Controlled Demolitions   Bombs Seismic Spikes   WTC 7 collapse Fire cannot cause collapse Early Flash Severe damage Steel frame failure No bomb fragments Fires assisted by structural failure Pictures and videos of planes Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 3.
  • 4.
    MQ-4 Global HawkNo windows on planes “ Commercial” planes were in gray military livery Plane Was Not a Commercial Airliner 767 does not resemble MQ-4 No clear side views of planes Missing planes/people United livery visible Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 5.
    LEFT: United Airlines767 before crashing into the WTC. BELOW: United Airlines 767 in 2001 livery. Boeing 767 RQ-4
  • 6.
    Al Qaeda NotResponsible   Tapes faked Polls Population in Al Qaeda innocence Tapes sent by Bin Laden Polls Hasty generalization Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 7.
  • 8.
    WTC Hit byMissile    Plane launched missile Missile attached to plane Early flash Frame-by-frame “ Pods” part of all 767s Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 9.
    No explosion beforeimpact. Frame 1 Frame 2 Frame 3 Frame-by-frame shows small explosion upon impact, not before . #1: Two pods #2: A bulge #3: The missile itself Conspiracy Theorists’ Interpretation “ Bulge” is actually landing gear housing. “ Pods” are present on a clear view of a United 767. “ Pods” “ Missile” is a standard protrusion on all 767s.
  • 10.
    U.S. Military Responsible   USAF plane hit WTC and/or Pentagon U.S. missile No air support Planes’ paint schemes not USAF Pictures of planes Lack of contingency plans Inefficient communications Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 11.
    Single tail finAmerican Airlines Flight 11 RQ-4 Global Hawk Dual tail fin United Airlines Flight 175 United Two-Tone Paint Scheme United “U” Tail Logo Note: Military aircraft have a one-tone white or gray paint scheme.
  • 12.
    Pentagon Hit byMissile    Tomahawk missile No plane visible Not all security camera footage released No missile contrails Tail partially visible Classified security footage Plane parts found Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Flight 93 ShotDown    Scattered debris Small pieces of debris Retired Lt. Col. says F-16 shot down Flight 93 Flying debris upon impact F-16 pilot was nowhere near crash site Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Flight 93 Staged   Flight 93 landed safely Debris was placed Explosives used to make crater Plane emergency lands at KCLE @ 10:10, UAL93 passed KCLE @ ~9:35 Witnesses Response within 30 min. Black box/cockpit recordings Phone calls Believer Perspective Debunking
  • 17.
    KCLE Piece ofUAL93 debris 2001 United Paint Scheme
  • 18.
    Conclusion Based onavailable facts and evidence, we have concluded that 9/11 was not a government conspiracy Most conspiracy theories have a plausible explanation that debunks them Many conspiracy theorists overanalyze available information