Always Changing: Nurse Educators and TechnologyExamSoft
Christina Barker BSN, RN, Technology Coordinator/ Instructor, Baker University School of Nursing
This webinar will look at the ever changing process of technology adoption in the nursing curriculum. Integrating ExamSoft as a testing platform helps to create a stable and reliable method of evaluation for all courses in the curriculum. Though our journey had many opportunities for improvement, it was a process that allowed for growth and insight into our strengths and weaknesses as a faculty and a school of nursing. This presentation will showcase lessons learned for technology implementation, training, and faculty buy-in.
IIM, IIT study helps doctors manage time efficiently by Dr.Mahboob Khan PhdHealthcare consultant
For example, the timetable suggests that if the patient load is up to 400 per day and the consultation time is between 15 and 20 minutes, then two full OPD days per week would be the best. Two full days OPD cycle is also preferable if the patient load increases to 500 per day. The problem arises only if the patient load is increased to 500 per day and the consultation time is also increased, then the four half-day OPD schedule would be best.
If the hospital follows four half days of OPD schedule, then, clearly the patients are able to get over with their OPD treatment in much less time than before, as in one week now, they can receive consultation four times rather than two times.
This collaboration between Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Cardozo Law builds upon the long history and rich clinical experience of the Montefiore-Einstein bioethics consultation service.
STARSurg - student audit and research collaboration presentationDr Edward Fitzgerald
The Student Audit and Research in Surgery Collaborative (STARSurg) is the UK’s first national student-led research collaborative. STARSurg empowers students from all 33 medical schools in the UK to participate in high quality national audit and research studies in surgery which aim to improve patient care.
STARSurg fosters academic and research training, promotes evidence-based practice and builds a culture of collaboration necessary for 21st century medicine.
STARSurg continues to grow nationally and has since delivered three multi-centre and student-led national studies, which to date have included thousands of collaborators and over ten thousand patients across the UK and Ireland.
Always Changing: Nurse Educators and TechnologyExamSoft
Christina Barker BSN, RN, Technology Coordinator/ Instructor, Baker University School of Nursing
This webinar will look at the ever changing process of technology adoption in the nursing curriculum. Integrating ExamSoft as a testing platform helps to create a stable and reliable method of evaluation for all courses in the curriculum. Though our journey had many opportunities for improvement, it was a process that allowed for growth and insight into our strengths and weaknesses as a faculty and a school of nursing. This presentation will showcase lessons learned for technology implementation, training, and faculty buy-in.
IIM, IIT study helps doctors manage time efficiently by Dr.Mahboob Khan PhdHealthcare consultant
For example, the timetable suggests that if the patient load is up to 400 per day and the consultation time is between 15 and 20 minutes, then two full OPD days per week would be the best. Two full days OPD cycle is also preferable if the patient load increases to 500 per day. The problem arises only if the patient load is increased to 500 per day and the consultation time is also increased, then the four half-day OPD schedule would be best.
If the hospital follows four half days of OPD schedule, then, clearly the patients are able to get over with their OPD treatment in much less time than before, as in one week now, they can receive consultation four times rather than two times.
This collaboration between Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Cardozo Law builds upon the long history and rich clinical experience of the Montefiore-Einstein bioethics consultation service.
STARSurg - student audit and research collaboration presentationDr Edward Fitzgerald
The Student Audit and Research in Surgery Collaborative (STARSurg) is the UK’s first national student-led research collaborative. STARSurg empowers students from all 33 medical schools in the UK to participate in high quality national audit and research studies in surgery which aim to improve patient care.
STARSurg fosters academic and research training, promotes evidence-based practice and builds a culture of collaboration necessary for 21st century medicine.
STARSurg continues to grow nationally and has since delivered three multi-centre and student-led national studies, which to date have included thousands of collaborators and over ten thousand patients across the UK and Ireland.
Cloud Computing creates new opportunities for delivering software as a service. Monitis is the first and only company which provides holistic application performance, server and network monitoring as all-in-one cloud-based service
Cloud Computing creates new opportunities for delivering software as a service. Monitis is the first and only company which provides holistic application performance, server and network monitoring as all-in-one cloud-based service
Protocol writing is a critical phase in the planning and execution of clinical research studies. A well-structured and comprehensive protocol serves as the blueprint for the study, guiding researchers, ethics committees, and regulatory authorities.
Protocol writing is a critical step in clinical research that involves developing a detailed plan or protocol for conducting a clinical trial. The protocol serves as a roadmap for the study, outlining the objectives, methodology, participant eligibility criteria, data collection procedures, and analysis plan. Here are key considerations when writing a protocol in clinical research:
Study Objectives and Research Questions: Clearly define the primary and secondary objectives of the study. State the research questions or hypotheses that the study aims to answer. This sets the foundation for the study design and data analysis plan.
Study Design: Describe the study design, such as randomized controlled trial (RCT), observational study, or non-inferiority trial. Specify the study phases (if applicable) and the allocation of study participants to different arms or groups. Justify the chosen design and explain how it aligns with the research objectives.
Participant Selection and Eligibility Criteria: Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria for participant selection. These criteria should be specific and relevant to the study population. Consider factors such as age, gender, medical history, disease severity, and previous treatments.
Interventions and Procedures: Describe the study interventions or treatments in detail. Specify the dosage, administration route, duration, and frequency of interventions. Document the study procedures, including data collection methods, laboratory tests, imaging techniques, and follow-up visits.
Sample Size and Power Calculation: Provide a rationale for the sample size estimation. Explain the statistical power calculation, specifying the desired effect size, significance level, and power. Justify the selected values and ensure that the sample size is sufficient to detect the intended effect or difference.
Data Collection and Management: Detail the data collection methods, including the use of case report forms (CRFs), electronic data capture (EDC) systems, or other data collection tools. Specify the variables to be collected, their measurement scales, and any scoring systems or questionnaires to be used. Describe the data management processes, data quality control procedures, and methods for ensuring data integrity.
Statistical Analysis Plan: Outline the statistical analyses that will be performed on the collected data. Describe the primary and secondary endpoints, statistical tests, and methods for handling missing data and outliers. Specify any interim analyses, subgroup analyses, or sensitivity analyses that will be conducted.
Ethical Considerations: Address ethical aspects, such as informed consent procedures, protection of participant confidentiality, and compliance with ethical guidelines and regulations. Discuss any potential risks and benefits to participants and how they will be mitigated. Outline the process for obtaining ethical approvals and reporting adverse events.
Florida Virtual School, the nation’s largest state K-12 virtual school, engages in multiple instructional research partnerships each year. In this presentation, members of the FLVS leadership team will discuss the process of designing organizational research goals and partnering with external researchers, in addition to sharing the challenges and best practices in managing research partnerships—from research methods/design to data collection and security. Additionally, a summary of ongoing instructional research projects at FLVS will be offered. This presentation will appeal to both providers and researchers as an opportunity to learn more about working together in the important process of research partnership.
Summary - Lecture 2: Research Proposal DevelopmentESD UNU-IAS
2018 ProSPER.Net Young Researchers' School
Lecture summary prepared by Nguyen Ngoc Cuong Tran (Western Sydney University) & Hafiz Syed Hamid Arshad (Asian Institute of Technology)
Applying a Reverse Induction Process for Improved Definition of Higher Educat...Helen Farley
Scoping out the detail of a Higher Education research project can be a time-consuming and frustrating experience. The excitement of a research project is frequently stifled by the tedious process of mapping out project activities, estimating required resources and developing project schedules.
Reverse induction provides a fresh approach to defining technology-supported research projects. In much the same way as new product development must be guided by an understanding of customer needs, reverse induction focuses on research outcomes before formulating research aims. Using a systematic process of backward reasoning, researchers can define a project concept in a structured and efficient manner. There is significant potential for reverse induction to deliver time and cost savings in a complex and challenging Higher Education environment.
This document applies to all students registered as a student at Anglia Ruskin University in the Ashcroft International Business School (AIBS), and all their Partner Institutions, regarding the ethical approval of Undergraduate, Taught Postgraduate Masters Dissertations, Research–based Management Research Reports, and Work-based projects. For those undertaking any research/project work outside the UK you are required to ensure that your research/study/project complies with UK legal and ethical requirements.
Similar to 5230 participation in research projects (20)
1. Submitted for Board work session discussion – February 6, 2014
PARTICIPATION IN RESEARCH PROJECTS
Policy Code:
5230
The board encourages agencies and individuals to conduct research on issues related to student
achievement and the effective operation of the school system.
The superintendent may approve a request for participation in a research project if:
1.
2.
3.
the research results ultimately may benefit students of the school system;
the project's purpose and methodology are compatible with the goals and objectives of
the board and school system; and
the project will not disrupt instructional time.
The superintendent is encouraged to involve central office administrators, school administrators,
teachers and parents in making this assessment. The superintendent shall report on approved
research projects at the next regularly-scheduled board meeting.
A research project involving a survey of students must comply with policy 4720, Surveys of
Students.
All research projects must comply with the confidentiality requirements of policy 4700, Student
Records, and policy 4705/7825, Confidentiality of Personal Identifying Information.
Legal References: G.S. 115C-47, -230
Cross References: Student Records (policy 4700), Confidentiality of Personal Identifying
Information (policy 4705/7825), Surveys of Students (policy 4720)
Adopted:
BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY MANUAL
Page 1 of 1