GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.i
PREFACE
Across Ghana’s urban landscape, from the bustling heart of Accra to the growing edges of
Tamale, millions of Ghanaians live in environments that are often invisible in policy discussions
but all too visible on the ground. You see it in crowded compounds, temporary dwellings,
children playing near open drains, and families navigating daily life, cooking, cleaning, and
surviving in spaces never meant for so many.
This report by the Ghana Statistical Service provides the most detailed portrait to date of slums
and informal settlements in Ghana, drawn from data collected during the 2021 Population and
Housing Census. It gives us more than statistics, it shows where we are as a nation in the quest
for inclusive urban development.
In this analysis, a household is said to exhibit slum characteristics if it lacks access to improved
drinking water, improved sanitation, durable housing, sufficient living space, or any
combination of these. The findings from the report are sobering:
• Nearly half of all urban households, 46.1% or about 2.2 million, exhibit one or more slum
conditions;
• About 4.82 million Ghanaians, roughly 30.8% of the urban population, are living in slums,
a figure that exceeds the global average of 24.7% but lower the Sub-Saharan average
of 53.9%;
• The Northern and Savannah Regions report the highest levels of extreme slum intensity;
• Even in more developed regions like Greater Accra and Ashanti, slum households face
precarious living conditions, with more than half living in rented accommodations.
• Multidimensional poverty is more than twice as prevalent in slum areas (23.4%)
compared to non-slum areas (10.5%);
• Educational, health, and sanitation outcomes are consistently worse in slum areas with 1
in 3 residents in slum areas who cannot read or write and 1 in 5 people who have never
been to school. In addition, household death rates in slum arears (41.6 per 10,000 people)
exceed those in non-slum areas (30.7 per 10,000 people).
These are not just numbers. They represent real people, families striving, often with great effort,
to make a life within difficult constraints. With the right commitment, coordination, and policy
direction, we can use the data to change these outcomes.
As part of its mandate, the Ghana Statistical Service remains committed to producing
accessible and user-focused data. The shift from a producer-centred model to one shaped by
user needs has been deliberate. We recognise that timely, disaggregated, and policy-relevant
data are essential to informed planning and development at both national and local levels.
This report, therefore, is not just a publication, it is a tool, designed to enable key stakeholders
including Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs), Metropolitan, Municipal and District
Assemblies (MMDAs), Parliament, civil society, researchers, and development actors to prioritise
actions where the needs are most acute.
The data in this report also aligns strongly with national and international development priorities,
including Ghana’s National Urban Policy, the Spatial Development Framework, and Sustainable
5.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.ii
Development Goal 11.1, which commits us to upgrading all slums by 2030. By bringing together
indicators on housing, literacy, poverty, fertility, mortality, and sanitation, disaggregated across
slum and non-slum urban areas, this report equips policymakers and practitioners alike to pursue
more inclusive urban growth with renewed urgency and focus.
This is a defining moment. The evidence is clear. The tools are in hand. What is required now is
coordinated, sustained action:
• Government, especially at the local level, could use this data to design better-targeted
development plans, allocate budgets for slum upgrading, and invest in improved water,
sanitation, and housing infrastructure;
• Civil Society could support community-led advocacy, expand literacy and
empowerment initiatives, especially for women and youth in underserved areas;
• For the Private Sector, there is both an opportunity and a responsibility, through the
provision of low-cost housing projects, micro-finance services, prepaid utilities, and
solutions tailored to the lived realities of slum communities; and
• For our Development Partners, they could align funding and technical assistance to long-
term, flexible, and locally grounded interventions that empower both institutions and
communities.
Each household we reach and each community we improve takes us one step closer to
building cities that are not only modern, but fair. Not only expanding, but inclusive. This report
should mark the turning point, a starting place for real action to change the story it reveals.
Dr. Alhassan Iddrisu
Government Statistician
6.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Ghana Statistical Service (GSS) extends its profound gratitude to the Government of
Ghana, and all members of the National Census Steering Committee, National Census
Technical Advisory Committee, National Census Publicity, Education and Advocacy
Committee, and the Regional and District Census Implementation Committees for their
unwavering commitment and dedication. GSS also acknowledges the contributions of the
Governing Board of GSS , the immediate past Government Statistician and Chief Census
Officer, all Census Officials and field officers, the media, and the public who contributed
immensely for the successful completion of the 2021 Population and Housing Census (PHC).
Their efforts were instrumental in ensuring the well-coordinated operation of the 2021 PHC,
which forms the bedrock of this thematic report.
The Service deeply appreciates the support received from various Ministries and government
agencies, and the various District Assemblies, Religious and Traditional Leaders, individuals, and
all other organizations that provided essential support for the execution of the population and
housing census.
Ghana Statistical Service also extends its sincere appreciation to the development partners and
collaborators, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), World Bank, European Union (EU),
International Organization for Migration (IOM), United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP), United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), United Kingdom Office for
National Statistics (ONS), Statistics Denmark, Geo-Referenced Infrastructure and Demographic
Data for Development (GRID3).
Finally, GSS expresses its heartfelt appreciation to the authors whose dedication, critical insights,
analytical rigour, and interpretation shaped the core of the Slums and Informal Settlements in
Ghana Report. Special thanks also go to the subject matter reviewers, their expertise in
reviewing and validating the findings was vital in the flow and clarity of this final report.
7.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface..................................................................................................................................................i
Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................... iii
List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................vi
List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................... vii
Abbreviations and Acronyms.......................................................................................................... viii
Executive Summary............................................................................................................................ ix
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1
2 Definition of Concepts, Data Sources and Estimation ..............................................................3
2.1 Definition of concepts .........................................................................................................3
2.1.1 Urban.................................................................................................................................3
2.1.2 Rural ..................................................................................................................................3
2.1.3 Rural+ ................................................................................................................................3
2.1.4 Household.........................................................................................................................3
2.1.5 Slum...................................................................................................................................3
2.1.6 Slum status ........................................................................................................................4
2.1.7 Slum intensity ....................................................................................................................4
2.1.8 Improved drinking water sources ...................................................................................4
2.1.9 Improved sanitation.........................................................................................................4
2.1.10 Sufficient living area (overcrowding)..........................................................................4
2.1.11 Structural quality/durability of dwelling units .............................................................4
2.1.12 Locality..........................................................................................................................5
2.1.13 Neighbourhood............................................................................................................5
2.1.14 Multidimensional poverty ............................................................................................5
2.1.15 School attendance......................................................................................................5
2.1.16 Level of education.......................................................................................................5
2.1.17 Literacy..........................................................................................................................5
2.1.18 Use of ICT device/ Internet – access to information .................................................5
2.1.19 Tenure / Holding agreement.......................................................................................5
2.1.20 Cooking fuel .................................................................................................................5
2.1.21 Solid waste....................................................................................................................5
2.1.22 Refuse receptacle........................................................................................................6
2.1.23 Collected solid waste disposal method .....................................................................6
2.1.24 Total fertility rate ...........................................................................................................6
2.1.25 Children under 5 years.................................................................................................6
2.1.26 Household deaths ........................................................................................................6
8.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.v
2.2 Data sources ........................................................................................................................6
2.3 Slum estimation techniques ................................................................................................6
2.3.1 Slum estimation at neighbourhood and locality levels.................................................7
3 Justification for The Selection of Key Slum Indicators................................................................9
3.1 Education .............................................................................................................................9
3.2 ICT ownership and usage....................................................................................................9
3.3 Child bearing........................................................................................................................9
3.4 Children 0-4 years ................................................................................................................9
3.5 Household deaths..............................................................................................................10
3.6 Multidimensional poverty status........................................................................................10
3.7 Tenurial arrangements.......................................................................................................10
3.8 Environmental sanitation and health risks........................................................................10
4 Main Results ................................................................................................................................11
5 Summary of results, Conclusion and Policy Recommendations ............................................48
5.1 Summary and Conclusion.................................................................................................48
5.2 Policy Recommendations .................................................................................................49
6 Appendix ....................................................................................................................................51
References.........................................................................................................................................84
List of Contributors .............................................................................................................................85
9.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.vi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.1. Maps of Ghana by type of localities.............................................................................11
Figure 4.2: Spatial distribution of households by number of slum conditions................................12
Figure 4.3: Map of Ghana by slum status........................................................................................13
Figure 4.4: Spatial distribution of neighbourhoods by slum intensity .............................................14
Figure 4.5: Proportion of urban household population living in slums by region ..........................16
Figure 4.6: Children under five years by region and slum status ...................................................36
Figure 4.7: Proportion of persons 4 years and older, never attended school by region and slum
status ..................................................................................................................................................37
Figure 4.8: Proportion of non-literate persons 6 years and older by region and slum status.......38
Figure 4.9: TFR of women of reproductive age (15-49 years) by region and slum status............39
Figure 4.10: Household deaths (per 10,000 population) by region and slum status ....................40
Figure 4.11: Multidimensionally poor urban population by region and slum status.....................41
Figure 4.12: Tenurial arrangement in slums by region.....................................................................42
Figure 4.13: Unimproved source of cooking fuel by region and slum status ................................43
Figure 4.14: Households using collected means of solid waste disposal by region and slum status
............................................................................................................................................................44
Figure 4.15: Urban slum solid waste disposal method by region and source of information ......45
Figure 4.16: Urban slum households by region and type of solid waste receptacle used..........46
Figure 4.17: Urban slum households by level of education of head, solid waste disposal method
used and region ................................................................................................................................47
10.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.vii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Number of households living in urban areas by region and slum indicator score........7
Table 2.2: Number of neighbourhoods and localities by slum status and region..........................8
Table 4.1: Distribution of urban households by region and slum status.........................................15
Table 6.1: Districts by region and type of locality classification ....................................................51
Table 6.2: Household slum characteristics status by district...........................................................60
Table 6.3: Urban households living in slums by districts...................................................................65
Table 6.4: Slum neighbourhood status by district, intensity and localities ....................................71
Table 6.5: Population characteristics of households in slums by districts ......................................78
11.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.viii
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AU African Union
DHS Demographic and Health Surveys
EU European Union
GHS Ghana Health Service
GLSS Ghana Living Standards Survey
GNHP Ghana National Housing Policy
GRID3 Geo-Referenced Infrastructure and Demographic Data for Development
GSS Ghana Statistical Service
ICT Information and Communication Technology
IOM International Organisation on Migration
MDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies
MLGRD Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development
MMDAs Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies
NDPC National Development Planning Commission
NUPF National Urban Policy Framework
ONS Office for National Statistics
PHC Population and Housing Census
SDGs Sustainable Development Goals
TFR Total Fertility Rate
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNECA United Nations Economic Commission for Africa
UNFPA United Nations Population Fund
UN-Habitat United Nations Human Settlements Programme
12.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.ix
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This thematic report presents the most comprehensive analysis to date on slums and informal
settlements in Ghana, drawing on data from the 2021 Population and Housing Census (PHC). It
offers an evidence-based foundation for policymakers, development partners, planners, and
civil society to understand the scale, nature, and impact of urban deprivation, and to act.
Ghana’s urban transformation has been rapid. In just six decades, the urban population has
surged from 23.1 percent in 1960 to 56.7 percent in 2021, with projections reaching 60.7 percent
by 2030. While urbanisation often signals economic opportunity, Ghana’s growth has outpaced
its ability to deliver basic infrastructure and housing services. The result has been a sharp rise in
slums and informal settlements across cities and towns.
To better reflect the lived urban experience, this report uses an enhanced urban classification
(“urban-2”), which defines urban areas not only by a population threshold of 5,000 or more but
also by the availability of key amenities like electricity, potable water, health services, and
schools. Strikingly, only 10 percent of Ghana’s localities meet this urban threshold, underscoring
the gap between urban status and urban quality of life.
The findings reveal that 46.1 percent of households in urban areas, about 2.2 million households,
show slum conditions. These conditions include lack of improved drinking water, inadequate
sanitation, overcrowding, and non-durable housing. Nationally, 34.1 percent of urban
neighbourhoods and 26.6 percent of urban localities qualify as slums.
But the story varies across the country. Slum conditions are most intense in the Northern,
Savannah, Oti, Western, Greater Accra, Central, Ashanti, and North East regions, revealing a
stark regional imbalance in planning and service delivery.
Residents of slum areas face deep social and economic exclusion. About 31 percent of people
aged six and above in slums cannot read or write, more than double the rate in non-slum areas.
One in five people in slums has never attended school. These educational gaps trap households
in cycles of poverty and limit access to formal employment and stable incomes.
Multidimensional poverty, capturing deprivations across health, education, and living
standards, is more than twice as high in slum areas (23.4%) compared to non-slum areas (10.5%).
Health and environmental conditions further compound the challenges. Total fertility rates are
higher in slums (2.9 vs. 2.5), contributing to larger household sizes and straining limited resources.
Mortality rates are also elevated, with 42 deaths per 10,000 people in slums compared to 31 in
non-slum urban areas, reflecting poorer access to healthcare, inadequate sanitation, and
exposure to unsafe living conditions.
Over half of slum households (54.8%) rely on harmful cooking fuels, contributing to indoor air
pollution and respiratory illnesses. Waste disposal practices also fall short in slum areas with only
46.2 percent of slum households using improved methods. In addition, uncovered waste
receptacles are more common in slums, leading to environmental degradation and public
health risks.
Despite these challenges, the data also reveals opportunity. Over a third of households (36%)
and nearly half of urban neighbourhoods (49%) fall in the low-intensity slum category. With the
13.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.x
right interventions, especially in basic service provision, infrastructure, and land use planning,
these areas could transition out of slum conditions quickly.
The report concludes with a clear call: decentralised, targeted, and context-aware policies are
urgently needed. Ghana’s urban future will be shaped not just by how we grow, but by how
we include. Slum upgrading must be a national priority, not a side programme, if we are to
meet our development goals and improve lives across every urban district.
Real progress will require coordinated action. Ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs),
Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies (MMDAs), civil society organisations, the private
sector, researchers, and development partners must work together.
• Government, especially at the local level, could use this data to design better-
targeted development plans, allocate budgets for slum upgrading, and invest in
improved water, sanitation, and housing infrastructure;
• Civil Society could support community-led advocacy, expand literacy and
empowerment initiatives, especially for women and youth in underserved areas;
• For the Private Sector, there is both an opportunity and a responsibility, through the
provision of low-cost housing projects, micro-finance services, prepaid utilities, and
solutions tailored to the lived realities of slum communities; and
• For our Development Partners, they could align funding and technical assistance to
long-term, flexible, and locally grounded interventions that empower both institutions
and communities.
Only through such collaboration can we build inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable cities,
and ensure that no slum dweller is left behind in Ghana’s journey towards SDG 11.
14.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.1
1 INTRODUCTION
The Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11 aims at making cities and human settlements
inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable towards improving the quality of life of the human
population. Currently, however, many cities, towns and residential spaces especially in low and
middle-income countries have conditions that do not measure up to this goal. This situation is
fuelled by rapid urbanisation where there is a gap between the increasing number of people
in urban areas and the residential housing stock. It is estimated that 60 percent of the world's
population will reside in urban areas by 2030, with low and middle-income countries accounting
for 90 percent of the projected urban growth (Elrayies, 2016; United Nations, 2018). It is estimated
that half of Africa’s population will live in cities and two-thirds of that growth will take place in
slums (Albuquerque & Guedes, 2021). Urbanisation could improve economic activities, as well
as the health and living conditions of the population.
However, in situations of inadequate infrastructure particularly in developing countries, rapid
urbanisation, could fuel the proliferation of slums and informal settlements, exacerbating urban
poverty and inequality (GUTT,2019; Marx, Stoker & Suri ,2013; UN-Habitat, 2020; World Bank,
2020). Slums and informal settlements are characterised by substandard housing,
overcrowding, pollution and impoverished living conditions. Slums and informal settlements
often reflect urban poverty, inequality and the challenges of rapid unplanned urbanisation with
profound implications for human wellbeing and sustainable development (United Nations,
2018).
Historically, slums and informal settlements develop close to central business districts of urban
areas where there are intense economic activities, because of rapid population growth,
industrialisation, often compounded by civil conflicts, internal displacements and exclusionary
urban planning policies that tend to concentrate essential service delivery at a few cities
especially the national capital (Ezeh et. al., 2017; Engstrom et. al. 2015; Grant, 2009; GSS, 2023).
This global pattern has been witnessed across continents since the 19th century, revealing a
common trajectory of urbanisation, especially in developing nations, where population growth
frequently outpaces the provision of adequate housing and public services.
Currently, it is estimated that one in eight people live in or are directly affected by slums
worldwide, with this number expected to rise as urbanisation continues to outpace housing and
infrastructure development (GUTT, 2019; UN-Habitat, 2020). Slum dwellers worldwide face
chronic challenges, including low incomes, limited access to education and healthcare, and
heightened vulnerabilities (UN-Habitat, 2020). In Ghana, these challenges manifest through
rural-urban and urban-urban migration as well as weak institutional frameworks, which have
increased the growth of slums in cities such as Accra, Kumasi, Tema, Sekondi-Takoradi and
Tamale (World Bank, 2020).
The persistence of slums and informal settlements perpetuates urban poverty and denies many
people access to adequate living conditions. Addressing this issue is at the core of the SDG 11,
target 1, which prioritises monitoring slums and inadequate housing to ensure no one is left
behind in achieving sustainable urban development (United Nations, 2018). Identifying and
quantifying the proportion of urban population living in slums and informal settlements is crucial
for designing and implementing suitable policies and initiatives to address these. This is in line
with the overarching goal of the 2012 Ghana National Urban Policy (GNUP), which among other
15.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.2
things is to promote sustainable spatially integrated and orderly development of urban
settlements with adequate housing, infrastructure and services (MLGRD, 2012).
Ghana’s population has been characterised by rapid urbanisation since independence, with
urban population rising from 23.1 percent in 1960 to 50.9 percent and 56.7 percent, respectively
in 2010 and 2021. This is projected to increase to 60.7 percent by 2030 (Ghana Statistical Service,
2024). Ghana’s rapid urban growth has been accompanied by increasing numbers of slum
dwellers, representing approximately 37.4 percent of the 2010 urban population (World Bank,
2014). Many urban dwellers especially migrants, seeking economic opportunities, often settle in
slums due to their inability to afford formal housing units (Amankwaa, 2013, Ghana Statistical
Service, 2023).
The Ghana National Housing Policy (GNHP, 2015), Ghana National Urban Policy Framework and
Action Plan (MLGRD, 2012), and Vision 2057: Long Term National Development Perspective
Framework (NDPC, 2024) are important policy documents that have been developed to
address these urban housing deficits and challenges. For example, the GNHP focuses on
providing access to housing and adequate shelter for the citizens of Ghana, while the GNUPF
is targeted at improving the urban environment for sustainable livelihoods.
In Ghana, just like elsewhere in the world, slums and informal settlements are often found in
marginalised or underserved locations, such as wetlands or flood-prone areas, exposing
residents to environmental hazards and public health risks. For instance, inadequate sanitation
in Ghana’s slums has contributed to frequent cholera outbreaks (GHS, 2025). These challenges
underscore the need for comprehensive approaches that integrate best global practices with
local realities to address slum and informal settlements growth.
This thematic report presents information on the growth and expansion of slums and informal
settlements across all urban areas in Ghana. The report also examines the characteristics of
slums and their intensity at neighbourhood and locality levels. It is a relevant source material for
policymakers, development practitioners and stakeholders to guide the adoption of evidence-
based strategies for addressing slum-related challenges in the country.
16.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.3
2 DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS, DATA SOURCES AND ESTIMATION
2.1 Definition of concepts
2.1.1 Urban
Urban areas have traditionally been classified based on population thresholds, and in Ghana it
is set at 5,000 people or more (Census Office, 1960, 1970; GSS, 1984, 2000, 2010). It is assumed
that a locality classified as urban would have certain basic facilities such as health facility,
police station, educational institutions, water and electricity. However, it is possible to have
localities that meet the population threshold of 5,000 but exhibit characteristics of a rural
settlement. To address this misconception, the 2021 PHC redefines an urban locality in Ghana
(Urban-2) as having at least 5,000 population in addition to a minimum of 75 percent of the
inhabitants with access to electricity; and at least 50 percent having access to potable water,
availability of health and educational facilities (at least basic school). The presentation in this
report is informed by this new definition.
2.1.2 Rural
Rural areas are localities with a population less than 5,000, irrespective of the population’s
access to basic amenities.
2.1.3 Rural+
These include all rural areas defined above in addition to other localities that hitherto were
urban on account of the population being 5,000 or more but do not meet the requirements
under the Urban-2 definition of an urban area.
2.1.4 Household
A person living alone or a group of two or more persons living together in the same dwelling unit
and making common provision for their living. The concept of a household is based on the
arrangements made by persons, individually or in groups, for providing themselves with food or
other essentials for living. A household may be either:
a) A one-person household: an individual who makes provision for his or her own food or
other essentials for living without combining with any other person.
b) A multi-person household: a group of two or more persons living together who make
common provisions for food or other essentials for living and identifies one person as the
head.
2.1.5 Slum
According to the United Nations (UN), the official definition of a slum is based on five criteria:
durable housing, access to improved water, access to sanitation, sufficient living area, and
security of tenure. If one of these criteria is missing, then that household exhibit a slum
characteristic. Although we used the 2021 PHC, and current survey data (Demographic and
Health Survey (DHS) as well as The Ghana Living Standards Survey) to validate our information,
this definition did not include the fifth criteria of security of tenure. In the Census respondents
17.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.4
were only asked of their tenure arrangement (ownership of dwelling) we were unable to verify
the authenticity of tenurial agreements, hence limited to the first four.
2.1.6 Slum status
A household is categorised as having slum characteristics if it is located in an urban area
(defined based on urban-2 classification), but lacks one or more of the following:
1. access to improved drinking water
2. access to improved sanitation facilities (toilet)
3. sufficient living space which means not more than three people sharing the same
room.
4. durable housing (roof, wall and floor).
5.
Neighbourhoods and localities are categorised as slums if more than 50 percent of households
within their geographical area exhibit slum characteristics.
2.1.7 Slum intensity
Slum intensity is measured by the mean score of the level of deprivation of the household
conditions. The higher the slum intensity, the greater the level of deprivation of neighbourhoods
or localities. The scale used ranges from 0.0 to 3.99, this was reclassified into five (mutually
exclusive groups) where ≤ 0.5 coded as ”0” refers to non-slum, “<0.99 coded as1” is low, 1.00
– 1.99 as “2” is moderate, 2.00 -2,99 as “3” is high, and ≥3.00 as “4” is extreme.
2.1.8 Improved drinking water sources
A household is considered to have access to an improved drinking water source if the water
source is protected from outside contamination, such as pipe-borne water, borehole, tube well,
protected well, protected spring, bottled water and sachet water.
2.1.9 Improved sanitation
A household is considered to have access to improved sanitation if household members have
access to a facility with an excreta disposal system that hygienically separates human waste
from human contact. Improved sanitation facilities include flush/pour-flush toilets or latrines
connected to a sewer, septic tank or pit; ventilated improved pit latrine; pit latrine with a slab
or platform that covers the pit entirely; and composting toilets/latrines.
2.1.10 Sufficient living area (overcrowding)
Household dwelling unit provides a sufficient living area for the household members where not
more than three people share a sleeping room.
2.1.11 Structural quality/durability of dwelling units
A dwelling unit is considered ‘durable’ if the wall, roof and floor are made of durable materials
and protect households from the vagaries of the weather.
18.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.5
2.1.12 Locality
A locality refers to an inhabited geographical area with a distinct name and defined
boundaries. It could be a hamlet, mining camp, farm, village, town, city, or part of a town or
city. In this report, a locality is used with reference to the urban space.
2.1.13 Neighbourhood
This refers to smaller geographically defined areas or suburbs within a locality.
2.1.14 Multidimensional poverty
This is a non-monetary measure of poverty that reflects the various areas in which the population
may be deprived of their needs. It considers four dimensions; living conditions, health,
education, and employment; across 13 indicators. The indicators for living conditions include
cooking fuel, water, assets, housing, overcrowding, electricity, and toilet facilities. For
education, the indicators are school attendance, school attainment, and school lag. Health is
measured through mortality and health insurance coverage, while employment is measured
by whether individuals are employed.
2.1.15 School attendance
School attendance is defined as regular attendance at an educational institution or
programme by persons 4 years and older for organised learning at any level and classified as
never attended, attending now and attended in the past.
2.1.16 Level of education
This refers to the highest level of formal education attained by a person 4 years or older.
2.1.17 Literacy
The ability to read and write with basic understanding.
2.1.18 Use of ICT device/ Internet – access to information
The utilisation of an Information and Communication Technology (ICT) device or internet
connection to obtain or access information for practical or beneficial purposes, regardless of
who owns the device or service.
2.1.19 Tenure / Holding agreement
This refers to the arrangement under which the household occupies the dwelling unit (house),
namely owner-occupied, renting, rent-free, perching, squatting or caretaking.
2.1.20 Cooking fuel
This is the main source of fuel used in cooking by households, such as LPG, electricity, charcoal,
wood, and other residuals.
2.1.21 Solid waste
It refers to the range of garbage materials-arising from animal and human activities that are
discarded as unwanted and useless. E.g. Food waste, garden waste, plastic waste, scraps, etc
19.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.6
2.1.22 Refuse receptacle
This refers to the container (waste bin) or any item that temporarily stores waste generated.
2.1.23 Collected solid waste disposal method
This can be a truck or other forms of vehicles, tricycles, push carts, that are used for door-to-
door waste collection services by households.
2.1.24 Total fertility rate
It is the average number of children that would be born to a woman after going through her
reproductive lifespan (15-49 years).
2.1.25 Children under 5 years
This is all children aged 0 to 4 years (less than 60 months).
2.1.26 Household deaths
Deaths in the household within the last12-months preceding the Census Night.
2.2 Data sources
The data used in the analysis are from the 2021 PHC. The report is based on the Census data on
household characteristics, education, literacy, economic activity, living conditions, children
ever born, deaths to households, and housing characteristics. The analysis presents the levels
and intensity of slums in Ghana and examines the household living conditions in these areas.
2.3 Slum estimation techniques
The definition of a slum is based on four (4) indicators namely non access to improved toilets,
improved source of drinking water, and durable building materials as well as inadequate
number of rooms. These indicators were recoded into dummies (0, if the household has access
to improved water, toilet, durable building materials and not overcrowded, and 1 if otherwise).
A composite score was obtained by summing up the score of indicators. If a household scored
zero, it implies that the household does not lack any of the four indicators, and for that matter
does not exhibit any slum characteristic. On the contrary, a household with at least a score of
one (1) on any of the four indicators exhibits a slum characteristic. Table 2.1 presents the
regional distribution of households in urban areas by their scores as defined by the indicators
above.
20.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.7
TABLE 2.1: NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS LIVING IN URBAN AREAS BY REGION AND SLUM
INDICATOR SCORE
Region Total 0 1 2 3 4
National 4,766,083 2,570,794 1,737,099 441,226 16,350 614
Western 313,092 156,462 120,731 34,530 1,346 23
Central 466,044 255,473 165,081 44,354 1,131 5
Greater Accra 1,554,065 886,755 541,497 123,222 2,574 17
Volta 155,406 90,490 51,731 12,032 1,107 46
Eastern 417,557 261,088 132,073 23,822 563 11
Ashanti 949,935 528,606 331,390 88,703 1,214 22
Western North 74,475 47,785 22,243 4,277 167 3
Ahafo 77,391 37,862 31,368 7,943 212 6
Bono 188,935 107,185 65,861 15,663 218 8
Bono East 104,783 53,349 39,648 11,231 516 39
Oti 57,273 21,997 26,747 7,905 590 34
Northern 224,567 57,835 119,381 42,219 4,796 336
Savannah 32,515 7,986 16,791 6,822 879 37
North East 18,195 4,264 9,863 3,610 443 15
Upper East 71,785 27,273 36,208 7,914 386 4
Upper West 60,065 26,384 26,486 6,979 208 8
The estimation of slum is done at two levels namely, neighbourhood and locality based on the
indicator score of households within these classifications.
2.3.1 Slum estimation at neighbourhood and locality levels
Using the indicator score for households, an index for the neighbourhood was created which
averages the indicators for all households within that neighbourhood. This derived index ranges
between 0.0 to 4.0. If the neighbourhood has an index of 0.0, it implies that all households within
that neighbourhood do not exhibit any characteristic of a slum (all households have a score of
zero), while an index of 4.0 implies that all households within that neighbourhood exhibit slum
characteristics in all four indicators. If the index for the neighbourhood is greater than or equal
to 1, it implies that households in that neighbourhood have at least one indicator making it a
slum.
At the locality level, an index was created which is also an average of households’ scores within
the locality. If the locality has an index of 0.0, it implies that all households within that locality do
not exhibit any characteristic of a slum based on the four indicators, and an index higher than
0.0 implies that households within the locality have some characteristics of a slum.
21.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.8
TABLE 2.2: NUMBER OF NEIGHBOURHOODS AND LOCALITIES BY SLUM STATUS AND REGION
Region
Neighbourhood Locality
Total Non Slum Slum Total Non Slum Slum
National 24,654 16,251 8,403 1,789 1,313 476
Western 1,552 927 625 130 87 43
Central 2,158 1,477 681 221 165 56
Greater Accra 6,268 4,717 1,551 357 288 69
Volta 771 595 176 106 94 12
Eastern 1,898 1,502 396 173 160 13
Ashanti 6,097 4,292 1,805 392 338 54
Western North 378 324 54 30 29 1
Ahafo 454 258 196 21 18 3
Bono 1,063 692 371 76 57 19
Bono East 624 372 252 27 15 12
Oti 361 161 200 18 8 10
Northern 1,731 381 1,350 131 15 116
Savannah 193 38 155 9 2 7
North East 174 38 136 8 0 8
Upper East 530 239 291 57 20 37
Upper West 402 238 164 33 17 16
22.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.9
3 JUSTIFICATION FOR THE SELECTION OF KEY SLUM INDICATORS
This section presents the justification for the selection of key indicators for households and the
population in slum based on data from the 2021 PHC, Ghana Demographic and Health Survey
(GDHS), Annual Household Income and Expenditure Survey and other current surveys that
accurately reflect the characteristics. These indicators include education, ICT ownership and
usage, child-bearing, mortality, multidimensional poverty and other household living conditions
and practices.
3.1 Education
Education is positively associated with socio-economic status of the population, where high
levels of education are likely to be related to high income jobs, which may invariably determine
an individual’s social and economic capability to afford decent accommodation or housing in
an urban environment. Households with low levels of education are likely to live in slums or
informal settlements. Information on household educational levels helps in identifying sections
of the population that may be prone to living in slums. This may inform the need to target
interventions that are likely to improve educational access and eventually enhance their
quality of life. Furthermore, higher education is likely to influence household behaviours, such as
the adoption of improved solid waste disposal and sanitation practices, as higher levels of
education often correlate with greater awareness and adoption of safer and more sustainable
environmental practices.
3.2 ICT ownership and usage
Limited access to information and communication technology (ICT) is the norm in deprived and
marginalised localities. This situation can put such localities in social isolation and exclusion,
thereby limiting their access to essential services and participation in the formal economy.
Including an analysis of ICT ownership and usage in this report helps identify the digital divide in
urban areas with special reference to slums and informal settlements. This has the added
advantage of guiding policies that are likely to promote digital inclusion in line with the SDG 9
which seeks to build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialisation, and foster
innovation among urban residents.
3.3 Child bearing
Slum communities are commonly associated with high child bearing rates, which could
exacerbate overcrowding and strain already limited resources. Understanding child bearing
patterns in slums can help inform family planning and reproductive health interventions, which
in turn could contribute to improve living conditions and reduce poverty among slum dwellers.
3.4 Children 0-4 years
Children 0-4 years living in slums are particularly vulnerable to poor health outcomes such as
malnutrition, inadequate healthcare, and exposure to environmental hazards. Information on
the number of children 0-4 years can help identify areas where targeted interventions are
needed to improve the well-being of children and mothers living in slums. Improving children’s
health is an essential step towards ensuring that future generations escape slum conditions and
thereby contribute towards poverty reduction.
23.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.10
3.5 Household deaths
Slum residents often face higher mortality rates due to inadequate access to healthcare, poor
sanitation, and increased exposure to environmental hazards. Analysing mortality rates in slums
can help identify sections of the population at higher risk of dying and inform targeted
interventions to improve health outcomes. Reducing mortality rates is not only a crucial goal for
improving the well-being of slum residents but also an important indicator for monitoring
progress in achieving SDG 3, which is to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at
all ages.
3.6 Multidimensional poverty status
Households experiencing multidimensional poverty, especially in slums and informal
settlements, suffer deprivations across multiple indicators such as health, education, and living
standards, beyond just low income. This comprehensive lack of resources directly impacts their
ability to afford adequate housing, access basic services, and meet essential needs. Including
poverty status in the analysis helps in monitoring progress towards achieving SDG 1.2, which
focuses on reducing poverty by at least 50 percent in all dimensions.
3.7 Tenurial arrangements
Globally, tenurial arrangement is an important consideration for all residents especially in urban
areas. Tenurial arrangements are normally in the form of owning, renting, rent free, perching
and squatting. Understanding these tenurial arrangements is particularly important in slums and
informal settlements where the permanence of many dwelling units may often be in doubt.
Without formal recognition or secure tenure arrangements, residents face constant threats of
eviction, which discourages investment in housing maintenance engendering insecurity. This
lack of security undermines social cohesion and economic development largely within slums
and informal settlements. Analysing tenurial arrangement in this report is central to monitoring
progress towards realising the objectives of national housing-related policies.
3.8 Environmental sanitation and health risks
Poor environmental sanitation, due to inadequate facilities and improper waste disposal
practices, as well as limited use of clean cooking fuel poses significant health risks mainly in
slums and informal settlements. These conditions increase the spread of diseases, pollution, and
unhealthy environmental conditions. Analysing these sanitation conditions is crucial for
monitoring progress towards achieving SDG 6, which is to ensure the availability and sustainable
management of water and sanitation for all, SDG 3 (ensure healthy lives and promote well-
being for all at all ages), in addition to realising the objectives of national environmental,
sanitation and health policies.
24.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.11
4 MAIN RESULTS
One in ten (9.9%) of the 17,989 localities in Ghana are classified as Urban-2 areas and cover
barely 5.0 percent (11,811km2) of the country’s total land area (238,533 km2).
Figure 4.1a shows localities in Ghana classified as urban and rural based only on the attainment
of the population threshold of 5,000 or more as urban and all others as rural.
Figure 4.1b reflects the redefinition of urban areas (Urban-2) as localities with 5,000 or more
population, at least 75 percent of the inhabitants with access to electricity, 50 percent with
access to potable water as well as availability of health and educational (at least basic school)
facilities, and all other localities as Rural+.
All districts in four regions: Ahafo, Eastern, Western and Greater Accra, have at least one locality
being Urban-2.
FIGURE 4.1. MAPS OF GHANA BY TYPE OF LOCALITIES
Figure 4.1a Figure 4.1b
25.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.12
A household is described as having slum characteristic if it exhibits any one of the following: has
no improved source of drinking water, no improved sanitation facilities (toilet), no durable
housing or more than three people share the same room.
There are about 4.77 million households in Urban-2 areas, of which 2.57 million (53.9%) do not
exhibit any slum condition, however, a total of 2.20 million (46.1%) households exhibit slum
characteristics: 36.5 percent have one slum condition and 9.6 percent depict two or more
conditions.
FIGURE 4.2: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY NUMBER OF SLUM CONDITIONS
26.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.13
There are 24,654 neighbourhoods in urban areas, of these 8,403 representing a little over one-
third (34.1%) are slums.
A little more than one in four (26.6%) of the total number of localities in urban areas are slums.
FIGURE 4.3: MAP OF GHANA BY SLUM STATUS
27.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.14
Neighbourhood slum intensity varies across regions, with 16,251 exhibiting no slum condition,
one (1) classified as extreme, 98 as high, 4,177 as moderate, and 4,127 as low.
The Northern Region (74) has the highest number of neighbourhoods that exhibit high/extreme
slum intensities, followed by Savannah (7), Oti and Western (4 each), Greater Accra (3), Central,
Ashanti and North East (2 each), while Bono East has one.
Seven regions (Ahafo, Bono, Eastern, Volta, Westen North, Upper East and Upper West) exhibit
only low and moderate neighbourhood slum intensities.
FIGURE 4.4: SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF NEIGHBOURHOODS BY SLUM INTENSITY
28.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.15
A total of 4.77 million (57.0%) households in Ghana are in urban areas, of which 1.40 million,
representing 29.5 percent, are found in slums.
Ten of the 16 regions have higher than the national average of Urban-2 households in slums,
ranging from 79.1 percent in North East to 29.6 percent in Bono Region, while the remaining six
regions have proportions lower than the national average.
TABLE 4.1: DISTRIBUTION OF URBAN HOUSEHOLDS BY REGION AND SLUM STATUS
Households
Urban-2 household
slum status
Percent of
Urban-2
households
in slum
Total Urban-2 Non-slum Slum
National 8,365,174 4,766,083 3,361,817 1,404,266 29.5
North East 108,088 18,195 3,801 14,394 79.1
Savannah 133,114 32,515 7,553 24,962 76.8
Northern 437,934 224,567 58,922 165,645 73.8
Oti 174,031 57,273 26,161 31,112 54.3
Upper East 264,404 71,785 36,229 35,556 49.5
Upper West 190,193 60,065 35,913 24,152 40.2
Western 621,349 313,092 193,600 119,492 38.2
Ahafo 152,801 77,391 50,047 27,344 35.3
Bono East 288,725 104,783 68,371 36,412 34.7
Bono 317,994 188,935 133,051 55,884 29.6
Ashanti 1,523,101 949,935 686,966 262,969 27.7
Central 838,493 466,044 340,801 125,243 26.9
Greater Accra 1,702,160 1,554,065 1,182,309 371,756 23.9
Volta 491,373 155,406 123,520 31,886 20.5
Eastern 881,328 417,557 348,509 69,048 16.5
Western North 240,086 74,475 66,064 8,411 11.3
29.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.16
A total of 15.67 million people in Ghana live in Urban-2 areas, of which 4.82 million, representing
three in ten (30.8%), are found in slums.
Ten regions have proportions of their urban household population in slums, higher than the
national average, ranging from 80.7 percent in North East to 31.4 percent in Bono Region, while
the remaining six have proportions lower than the national average.
FIGURE 4.5: PROPORTION OF URBAN HOUSEHOLD POPULATION LIVING IN SLUMS BY REGION
30.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.17
REGION-SPECIFIC ANALYSES
WESTERN REGION
Half (50.4%) of all households in the region are in urban areas, 50.0 percent of which exhibit slum
characteristics.
Two-fifths (40.3%) of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, with 49.8 percent and 49.6
percent of these, exhibiting low and moderate slum intensities, respectively, and 0.6 percent as
high.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
31.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.18
CENTRAL REGION
More than half (55.6%) of all households in the Central Region are in urban areas, with 45.2
percent of these exhibiting slum characteristics.
About 32.0 percent of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, of which more than half
(52.7%) exhibit moderate slum intensities, while 47.0 percent depict low intensities and 0.3
percent as high.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.20
GREATER ACCRA REGION
Nine in ten (91.3%) households in the Greater Accra Region are in urban areas, and of these
42.9 percent exhibit slum characteristics.
One in four (24.7%) urban neighbourhoods in the region are slums, out of which 54.2 percent
exhibit moderate slum intensities, 45.6 percent show low intensities and 0.2 percent as high.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.22
VOLTA REGION
A little over three in ten (31.6%) households in the Volta Region are in urban areas, out of which
41.8 percent exhibit slum characteristics.
More than one in five (22.8%) urban neighbourhoods in the region are slums, with nearly two-
thirds (65.9%) of these exhibiting low slum intensities and 34.1 percent as moderate.
3
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
36.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.23
EASTERN REGION
Forty-seven percent of all households in the Eastern Region are in urban areas, and of these
37.5 percent exhibit slum characteristics.
Two in ten (20.9%) urban neighbourhoods in the region are slums, with nearly three in four (73.5%)
of these exhibiting low slum intensities and 27.0 percent as moderate.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
37.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.24
ASHANTI REGION
More than six in ten (62.4%) households in the Ashanti Region are in urban areas, out of which
44.4 percent exhibit slum characteristics.
About 30.0 percent of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, more than half (51.9%) of
which depict low slum intensities, and 48.0 percent and 0.1 percent, respectively, show
moderate and high intensities.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.26
WESTERN NORTH REGION
Thirty-one percent of all households in the Western North Region are in urban areas, out of which
35.8 percent exhibit slum characteristics.
One in seven (14.3%) urban neighbourhoods in the region are slums, 63.0 percent of which show
low slum intensities and 37.0 percent as moderate.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
40.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.27
AHAFO REGION
Half (50.6%) of all households in Ahafo Region are in urban areas, 51.1 percent of which exhibit
slum characteristics.
A little over two in five (43.2%) urban neighbourhoods in the region are slums, 67.9 percent of
these depicting low slum intensities and 32.1 percent as moderate.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
41.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.28
BONO REGION
About three in five (59.4%) households in Bono Region are in urban areas, out of which 43.3
percent exhibit slum characteristics.
More than one-third (34.9%) of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, 59.0 percent of
these showing low slum intensities and 41.0 percent as moderate.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
42.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.29
BONO EAST REGION
More than one-third (36.3%) of all households in Bono East Region are in urban areas, 49.1
percent of these exhibiting slum characteristics.
Forty percent of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, of which 52.0 percent, 47.6
percent and 0.4 percent show moderate, low and high intensities, respectively.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
43.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.30
OTI REGION
About one-third (32.9%) of all households in Oti Region are in urban areas, of which 43.3 percent
show slum characteristics.
More than half (55.4%) of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, 61.0 percent of which
exhibit low slum intensities, while 37.0 percent and 2.0 percent, respectively, depict moderate
and high intensities.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
44.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.31
NORTHERN REGION
More than half (51.3%) of all households in the Northern Region are in urban areas, of which 74.2
percent exhibit slum characteristics.
Nearly eight out of ten (78.0%) urban neighbourhoods in the region are slums, 62.4 percent of
which exhibit moderate slum intensities, and 32.1 percent, 5.4 percent and 0.1 percent,
respectively, show low, high and extreme intensities.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
45.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.32
SAVANNAH REGION
Nearly one-fourth (24.4%) of all households in the Savannah Region are in urban areas, a little
over three-quarters (75.4%) of which show slum characteristics.
Eight out of ten (80.3%) of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, of which 55.5 percent
exhibit moderate slum intensities, and 40 percent and 4.5 percent, respectively, show low and
high intensities.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
46.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.33
NORTH EAST REGION
One in six (16.8%) households in North East Region are in urban areas, of which more than three-
quarters (76.6%) have slum characteristics.
More than three-quarters (78.2%) of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, 64.7 percent
of which show moderate slum intensities, and 33.8 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively, depict
low and high intensities.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
47.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.34
UPPER EAST REGION
More than a quarter (27.1%) of all households in Upper East Region are in urban areas, 62.0
percent of which have slum characteristics.
More than half (54.9%) of the region’s urban neighbourhoods are slums, of which 60.5 percent
and 39.5 percent exhibit low and moderate intensities, respectively.
Urban
areas
Slum
status
Deprivation Intensity
48.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.35
UPPER WEST REGION
A little more than three in ten (31.6%) households in the Upper West Region are in urban areas,
of which 56.1 percent exhibit slum characteristics.
Two in five (40.8%) urban neighbourhoods in the region are slums, 59.8 percent of which show
low slum intensities, while 40.2 percent have moderate intensities.
3
Urban
areas
Incidence
of slum
Deprivation Intensity
49.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.36
A total of 1.78 million (11.4%) of Ghana’s urban population are children under 5 years, with a
relatively higher proportion (12.2%) of these children living in slums compared to that in non-
slum areas (11.0%).
Seven of the 16 regions have proportions of children in slums higher than the national average,
ranging from 15.9 percent in Northern Region to 12.9 percent in Bono East.
Apart from Ahafo, Western North and Eastern regions, the proportion of children living in slums
is higher than those in non-slum areas.
FIGURE 4.6: CHILDREN UNDER FIVE YEARS BY REGION AND SLUM STATUS
50.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.37
More than one-fifth (21.5) of persons 4 years and older living in slums have never attended
school, which is 2.4 times that in non-slums (9.1%), and a similar pattern with varying magnitudes
is observed across all regions.
More than one-third of persons living in slums in North East, Savannah, Northern and Oti regions
have never been to school, compared to less than one-fifth in Greater Accra, Ashanti, Eastern,
Ahafo, Western, Western North, Bono and Volta regions.
FIGURE 4.7: PROPORTION OF PERSONS 4 YEARS AND OLDER, NEVER ATTENDED SCHOOL BY
REGION AND SLUM STATUS
51.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.38
At the national level, 30.8 percent of persons 6 years and older living in slums are non-literate,
which is 16.8 percentage points higher than that in non-slums (14.0%).
There are wide variations in the proportion of non-literate persons 6 years and older across slums
in the regions, ranging from 51.0 percent in North East, the highest, to 19.2 percent in Greater
Accra, the lowest.
A similar pattern is observed in non-slum areas across the regions, with the Savannah Region
(38.4%) having the highest proportion of non-literate persons 6 years and older, compared to
8.3 percent in Greater Accra, the lowest.
FIGURE 4.8: PROPORTION OF NON-LITERATE PERSONS 6 YEARS AND OLDER BY REGION AND
SLUM STATUS
52.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.39
Child bearing measured by total fertility rate (TFR) of women (15-49 years) is 2.7 in urban Ghana,
and is higher among women living in slums (2.9) than those in non-slums (2.5).
Among women living in slum areas, the Northern Region has the highest TFR of 4.1, followed by
Oti Region (3.9), with Greater Accra recording the lowest (2.3), but in non-slum areas TFR is
highest in both Northern and Savannah (3.5 each), with Greater Accra again recording the
lowest (2.1).
Across the regions, there is a general pattern of a relatively higher TFR among women in slums
than those in non-slum areas apart from the Western North where TFR is higher in non-slum (2.6)
than slum areas (2.4), and in the Savannah (3.5), Ahafo (3.2) and Eastern (2.8) regions where
both slum and non-slum areas have the same TFR.
FIGURE 4.9: TFR OF WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE (15-49 YEARS) BY REGION AND SLUM
STATUS
53.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.40
Nationally, there are about 11 more household deaths per 10,000 persons in slum (42) areas,
compared to non-slum (31) areas.
In either slum or non-slum areas, there are wide disparities in household deaths across the
regions, ranging from 59.8 per 10,000 in Central Region, the highest, to 27.6 in Greater Accra,
the lowest in the slum areas, while in the non-slum areas Upper East (46.9) recorded the highest,
and Greater Accra (24.8), again as the lowest.
FIGURE 4.10: HOUSEHOLD DEATHS (PER 10,000 POPULATION) BY REGION AND SLUM STATUS
54.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.41
Multidimensional poverty is 2.2 times higher in the slum (23.4%) than in non-slum (10.5%) areas in
urban Ghana, and there is a similar pattern with varying disparities across the regions.
In either slum or non-slum urban areas, Oti Region recorded the highest proportion of
multidimensionally poor population of 50.2 percent and 28.2 percent, respectively, while Upper
East (12.6%) and Upper West (5.9%) have the lowest rates for the slum and non-slum areas,
respectively.
FIGURE 4.11: MULTIDIMENSIONALLY POOR URBAN POPULATION BY REGION AND SLUM STATUS
55.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.42
Greater Accra Region (52.5%) has the highest proportion of households in urban slums living in
rented dwelling units, followed by Ashanti (51.8%) and Western (46.6%), while North East (16.5%)
has the lowest proportion.
The proportion of households with owner occupier tenurial arrangement in urban slums varies
across the regions and is highest in North East (77.4%) and lowest in Ashanti (28.4%).
Rent-free tenurial arrangement is also highest in Central Region (28.8%), followed by Bono
(27.0%) and Volta (23.4%) regions, with North East and Upper East (5.4% each), recording the
lowest.
FIGURE 4.12: TENURIAL ARRANGEMENT IN SLUMS BY REGION
56.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.43
Nationally, more than five in ten (54.8%) urban slum households use unimproved cooking fuel,
compared to three in ten (31.0%) non-slum households.
North East (87.2%) and Oti (83.5%) regions have the highest proportions of urban slum
households using unimproved cooking fuel, compared to Greater Accra (32.4%), the lowest.
There are marked disparities in the use of unimproved cooking fuel in non-slum urban areas
across the regions, with the highest in North East (77.1%), followed by Savannah (70.6%), with
the lowest recorded in Greater Accra (16.9%).
FIGURE 4.13: UNIMPROVED SOURCE OF COOKING FUEL BY REGION AND SLUM STATUS
57.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.44
The Proportion of households using door-to-door collection services in urban slums (46.2%) is 9.6
percentage points lower than that in non-slum (55.7%) areas.
Greater Accra has the highest proportions using collected waste disposal methods in both
urban slum (70.0%) and non-slum (76.6%) areas, which is 6.0 and 10.4 times that of North East for
urban slum (11.7%) and non-slum (7.4%) areas, respectively.
FIGURE 4.14: HOUSEHOLDS USING COLLECTED MEANS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL BY REGION
AND SLUM STATUS
58.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.45
A higher proportion of urban slum households with ownership of radio/tv/internet (59.8%)
dispose their solid waste by collection, than those without ownership (29.6%) of any of these
sources of information.
There are marked regional disparities in the proportion of urban households, with or without
ownership of radio/tv/internet, that do not use the collected means of solid waste disposal, with
North East recording the highest proportions at the household level, regardless of their
ownership of radio/tv/internet (91.8%), or otherwise (94.5%), compared to the lowest in Greater
Accra (21.3% and 45.6%, respectively).
FIGURE 4.15: URBAN SLUM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD BY REGION AND SOURCE OF
INFORMATION
59.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.46
About seven in ten (68.4%) urban slum households in Ghana use uncovered solid waste
receptacles, 25.9 percent use covered receptacles and 5.7 percent have no receptacles.
There are marked regional disparities in the type of solid waste receptacle used by households
in urban slums, with proportions using uncovered receptacles ranging from 80.7 percent in Bono
East Region, the highest, to 57.3 percent in Ashanti Region, the lowest.
The use of covered solid waste receptacles is highest in the Ashanti Region (40.0%) and lowest
in North East Region (11.2%), while six regions (Volta, Upper East, Northern, Savannah, North East
and Upper West) have 10.0 percent or more of their urban slum households not using any solid
waste receptacle, which is highest in the Volta Region (15.6%), and lowest in Western Region
(2.2%). .
FIGURE 4.16: URBAN SLUM HOUSEHOLDS BY REGION AND TYPE OF SOLID WASTE RECEPTACLE
USED
60.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.47
The proportion of urban slum households whose solid waste is not collected is highest among
those whose heads have no education (63.3%), compared to those with basic (51.5%) or higher
education (47.4%).
Across all regions, higher level of household head’s education appears to increase the
proportion of households with solid waste collected, apart from the North East Region where
urban slum households whose heads have higher level of education (13.3%) have relatively
lower proportion of their solid waste collected compared with others with basic level of
education (13.9%).
Among households in urban slum areas whose heads have higher level of education, the North
East Region (86.7%) has the highest proportion of their households not having their solid waste
collected, which is more than three times that of Greater Accra Region (26.1%), the lowest.
FIGURE 4.17: URBAN SLUM HOUSEHOLDS BY LEVEL OF EDUCATION OF HEAD, SOLID WASTE
DISPOSAL METHOD USED AND REGION
61.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.48
5 SUMMARY OF RESULTS, CONCLUSION AND POLICY
RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Summary and Conclusion
The findings from the slums and informal settlements report, highlight the widespread of slums
across Ghana’s urban localities. It also reveals that barely 10 percent of localities in Ghana are
urban, based on the Urban-2 definition. Forty-six percent of households exhibit slum
characteristics, 34.1 percent and 26.6 percent of neighbourhoods and localities respectively,
are slums. Overall, there are 4.82 million population which is 30.8 percent of the urban
population. Slum intensity varies geographically, with extreme slum conditions more prevalent
in Northern, Savannah, and Oti regions, as they recorded the highest number of
neighbourhoods classified as urban slums.
Demographic and health challenges are common features of urban slums as they record
higher total fertility rates (2.9), which is slightly higher than that in non-slum areas (2.5). The total
fertility rate in Northern Region is the highest, with an average of 4.0 children per woman in slum
areas compared to 2.1 for Greater Accra Region. There is approximately 12.2 percent of
children under 5 years in urban slum areas than non-slum (11.0%). Household death rates
exceed 50 deaths per 10,000 population in six regions (Upper East, Eastern, Volta, Central, Bono,
and Ahafo).
Slum households face greater multidimensional deprivations, with over 23.0 percent of their
populations affected, more than twice that of non-slum areas. The urban slum population is
characterised by higher non-literate (30.8%) among persons 6 years older and never attended
school (21.5%) rates for persons 4 years and older across the regions. Additionally, more than
half of households in urban slum areas use unimproved cooking fuels and informal or unsafe
solid waste disposal systems, contributing to environmental and health risks. Educational
disparities also influence waste management practices, where higher educational attainment
correlates with safer disposal methods. Access to information is also associated with improved
solid waste disposal methods, where households without access to information had lower
proportions of proper practices (door-to-door collection). Solid waste collection could be more
influenced by structural or administrative challenges rather than being solely a factor of
education. Nonetheless, sensitisation is critical in improving sanitation challenges across the
regions.
Tenurial arrangements in slum areas reveal a concerning pattern of informal and insecure
dwelling arrangements. While households in slums in the northern half owned their dwelling, that
of the southern half is characterised by renting. These variations reflect differences in housing
markets and affordability pressures across regions. The existence of informal tenurial
arrangements leave many slum dwellers vulnerable to eviction, overcrowding and disasters.
The findings highlight the multidimensional nature of slum conditions (unimproved sanitation,
unimproved water, overcrowding and non-durable housing materials, etc) and intensities in
Ghana’s urban landscape. The regional disparities underscore the need for more decentralised
and context-specific responses that address immediate deprivations. As Ghana’s population
continues to see a growth and urbanise rapidly, addressing slum proliferation must remain a
national priority.
62.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.49
5.2 Policy Recommendations
Based on the findings of this report, the following policy recommendations are put forth to guide
national and sub-national efforts towards fostering inclusive, resilient, and sustainable urban
development:
1. Enhance Access to Basic Urban Services:
• Water and Sanitation Infrastructure: Prioritize investments in extending and
upgrading sanitation facilities (toilets) and improved drinking water sources to all
urban areas, particularly in slums and existing informal settlements.
• Electricity Access: Ensure universal access to reliable and affordable electricity
for all urban households, especially those in newly urbanized and informal areas,
to improve living conditions and reduce reliance on harmful alternative energy
sources.
2. Improve Housing Quality and Living Space:
• Durable Housing Promotion: Develop and implement programmes that promote
and facilitate the construction or rehabilitation of durable housing materials for
walls, roofs, and floors in informal settlements. Develop clear, transparent, and
accessible legal frameworks for formalizing tenurial arrangements within urban
areas especially in slum and informal settlements. This can reduce vulnerability to
evictions, encourage private investment in housing upgrades, and foster social
stability.
• Overcrowding Mitigation: Formulate and enforce urban planning regulations that
address overcrowding by promoting minimum living space standards. This requires
innovative housing solutions, including affordable housing initiatives.
3. Address Socio-economic and Educational Disparities:
• Targeted Education Programmes: Design and implement specialised educational
interventions for slum residents, including sensitisation, adult literacy programmes
and initiatives to increase school attendance and retention rates among children
and youth. Focus on reducing the proportion of non-literate individuals and those
who have never attended formal schooling.
• Skills Development and Economic Opportunities: Invest in vocational training and
skill-building programs tailored to the needs of slum dwellers, linking them to
employment opportunities in growing urban sectors. This will enhance economic
mobility and reduce multidimensional poverty.
4. Improve Environmental Health and Waste Management:
• Integrated Waste Management Systems: Establish efficient and equitable
integrated solid waste management systems in urban areas, ensuring regular and
affordable waste collection services for all households, including those in informal
settlements. Promote the use of covered waste receptacles and discourage
informal dumping.
• Structural and Administrative Reforms: Address systemic structural and
administrative barriers that hinder effective solid waste collection. This may
63.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.50
include reforming local government capacities, improving logistics, and ensuring
adequate funding for municipal waste services.
• Public Health Campaigns: Conduct targeted public health campaigns on the risks
associated with unimproved cooking fuels and improper waste disposal methods.
Promote cleaner energy alternatives and educate communities on safe
sanitation and waste handling practices.
5. Strengthen Data-Driven Urban Planning and Governance:
• Decentralised Planning: Empower Metropolitan, Municipal, and District
Assemblies (MMDAs) with the necessary resources, technical capacity, and
legislative authority to implement decentralised and context-specific urban
planning and development initiatives, especially basic sanitation services as part
of every dwelling unit.
• Inter-sectoral Coordination: Foster a coordinated approach among government
Ministries Departments and Agencies (MDAs), the private sector, civil society
organizations, and research institutions to ensure integrated policy development
and program implementation for sustainable urban development.
• Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish robust mechanisms for continuous monitoring
and evaluation of urban development interventions, using data from sources from
household surveys and administrative data to track progress, identify emerging
challenges, and adapt strategies.
In terms of actors:
• Government, especially at the local level, could use this data to design better-
targeted development plans, allocate budgets for slum upgrading, and invest in
improved water, sanitation, and housing infrastructure;
• Civil Society could support community-led advocacy, expand literacy and
empowerment initiatives, especially for women and youth in underserved areas;
• For the Private Sector, there is both an opportunity and a responsibility, through the
provision of low-cost housing projects, micro-finance services, prepaid utilities, and
solutions tailored to the lived realities of slum communities; and
• For our Development Partners, they could align funding and technical assistance to
long-term, flexible, and locally grounded interventions that empower both institutions
and communities.
These recommendations collectively underscore the imperative for a holistic, inclusive, and
multi-stakeholder approach to transform Ghana’s urban settlements into truly sustainable and
equitable spaces. A coordinated approach involving government, Ministries, Departments and
Agencies (MDAs), Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies (MMDAs), private sector, civil
society, researchers, and other stakeholders is critical to ensuring that slum dwellers are not left
behind in the country’s development agenda and in the pursuit of the Sustainable
Development Goals, particularly Goal 11 on inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable cities.
64.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.51
6 APPENDIX
TABLE 6.1: DISTRICTS BY REGION AND TYPE OF LOCALITY CLASSIFICATION
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Western
Jomoro
138,044
■ ■
Ellembelle
131,846
■ ■
Nzema East
103,194
■ ■
Ahanta West 167,015 ■ ■
Effia-Kwesimintsim 189,737 ■ ■
Sekondi Takoradi Metro 267,614 ■ ■
Shama 127,845 ■ ■
Wassa East 108,669 ■ ■
Mpohor 56,742 ■ Rural+
Tarkwa Nsuaem 238,961 ■ ■
Prestea Huni Valley 250,076 ■ ■
Wassa Amenfi East 195,977 ■ ■
Wassa Amenfi Central 128,690 ■ ■
Wassa Amenfi West Municipal 142,869 ■ ■
Central
Komenda Edina Eguafo Abirem 184,024 ■ ■
Cape Coast Metro 210,526 ■ ■
Abura Asebu Kwamankese 137,965 ■ ■
Mfantsiman 187,226 ■ ■
Ekumfi 62,895 ■ ■
Gomoa West 143,560 ■ ■
Effutu 120,619 ■ ■
Gomoa Central 91,550 ■ ■
Gomoa East 342,180 ■ ■
Awutu Senya East 262,182 ■ ■
Awutu Senya 178,973 ■ ■
Agona East 109,336 ■ ■
65.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.52
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Agona West 151,382 ■ ■
Asikuman / Odoben / Brakwa 140,767 ■ ■
Ajumako-Enyan-Esiam 133,666 ■ ■
Assin South 117,492 ■
Twifo Heman Lower Denkyira 73,242 ■ ■
Twifo Ati Morkwa 111,790 ■ ■
Assin Fosu Municipal 98,380 ■ ■
Assin North 89,275 ■ ■
Upper Denkyira East 122,088 ■ ■
Upper Denkyira West 100,898 ■ ■
Greater Accra
Ga South 393,860 ■ ■
Weija Gbawe Municipal 240,367 ■ ■
Ga Central Municipal 373,736 ■ ■
Ablekuma North Municipal 179,097 ■ ■
Ablekuma West Municipal 172,665 ■ ■
Ablekuma Central Municipal 190,275 ■ ■
Ama 319,617 ■ ■
Korle Klottey 77,207 ■ ■
Ayawaso Central Municipal 106,678 ■ ■
Ayawaso East 59,625 ■ ■
Ayawaso North Municipal 71,304 ■ ■
La Dadekotopon Municipal 157,786 ■ ■
Ledzokuku 244,450 ■ ■
Krowor Municipal 160,878 ■ ■
Adentan Municipal 299,197 ■ ■
Ayawaso West Municipal 84,710 ■ ■
Okaikoi North 180,490 ■ ■
Ga North 264,686 ■ ■
Ga West 353,563 ■ Rural+
Ga East 318,780 ■ ■
La Nkwantanang -Madina
Municipal
248,335 ■ ■
Kpone Katamanso 464,400 ■ ■
Ashaiman 234,052 ■ ■
66.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.53
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Tema West 220,737 ■ ■
Tma-Tema Central 200,151 ■ ■
Tma-Tema East 230,242 ■ ■
Ningo Prampram 118,803 ■ ■
Shai Osudoku 85,592 ■ ■
Ada West 85,957 ■ ■
Ada East ■ ■
Volta
South Tongu 118,825 ■ ■
Anloga 99,686 ■ Rural+
Keta Municipal 82,844 ■ ■
Ketu South 265,902 ■ Rural+
Ketu North 120,799 ■ ■
Akatsi North 34,409 ■
Akatsi South 96,785 ■ ■
Central Tongu 87,489 ■ ■
North Tongu 117,035 ■ ■
Ho-West 87,371 ■ ■
Adaklu 40,601 ■
Agortime Ziope 41,550 ■ ■
Ho 189,238 ■ ■
South Dayi 60,422 ■ ■
Afadzato South 76,839 ■ Rural+
North Dayi 41,251 ■
Kpando Municipal 61,508 ■ ■
Hohoe Municipal 120,252 ■ ■
Eastern
Birim South 37,335 ■ ■
Birim Central 79,896 ■ ■
Achiase 59,004 ■ ■
Asene Manso Akroso 81,151 ■ ■
West Akim 123,228 ■ Rural+
Upper West Akim 100,373 ■ ■
67.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.54
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Ayensuano 99,053 ■ ■
Nsawam Adoagyiri Municipal 162,931 ■ ■
Akwapim South 80,548 ■ ■
Akwapim North 110,279 ■ ■
Okere District 54,111 ■ ■
New Juaben South 135,856 ■ ■
New Juaben North 92,898 ■ ■
Suhum Municipal 132,361 ■ ■
Abuakwa North 79,786 ■ Rural+
Abuakwa South 93,248 ■ ■
Denkyembour 80,660 ■ ■
Akyemansa 95,329 ■ ■
Kwaebibirem 127,434 ■ ■
Birim North 86,566 ■ ■
Atiwa West 64,105 ■ ■
Atiwa East 67,694 ■ ■
Fanteakwa South 57,209 ■ ■
Yilo Krobo 128,167 ■ ■
Lower Manya Krobo 127,592 ■ ■
Asuogyaman 106,029 ■ ■
Upper Manya Krobo 73,940 ■ ■
Fanteakwa North 59,673 ■ ■
Kwahu South 83,615 ■ ■
Kwahu West 152,284 ■ ■
Kwahu East 84,015 ■ ■
Kwahu Afram Plains South 77,490 ■ Rural+
Kwahu Afram Plains North 69,692 ■ ■
Ashanti
Amansie South 119,628 ■ ■
Amansie Central 98,374 ■ ■
Akrofuom 52,110 ■ ■
Adansi South 90,073 ■ ■
Adansi Asokwa 75,954 ■
Obuasi East 97,686 ■ ■
Obuasi Municipal 110,263 ■ ■
68.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.55
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Adansi North 57,253 ■ ■
Bekwai Municipal 145,859 ■ ■
Amansie West 119,069 ■ ■
Atwima Kwanwoma 248,279 ■ ■
Bosomtwi 174,628 ■ ■
Bosome Freho 65,820 ■
Asante Akim Central Municipal 96,917 ■ ■
Asante_Akim_South 130,705 ■ ■
Asante Akim North 90,076 ■ ■
Sekyere Kumawu 68,079 ■ ■
Sekyere East 79,067 ■ ■
Juaben Municipal 67,586 ■ ■
Ejisu 191,060 ■ ■
Oforikrom 225,317 ■ ■
Asokwa 132,829 ■ ■
KMA 469,377 ■ ■
Kwadaso Municipal 163,365 ■ ■
Suame Municipal 144,086 ■ ■
Old Tafo Municipal 120,910 ■ ■
Asokore Mampong 202,350 ■ ■
Kwabre East 313,792 ■ ■
Afigya Kwabre South 248,090 ■ ■
Atwima Nwabiagya North 163,893 ■ ■
Atwima Nwabiagya South
Municipal
171,153 ■ ■
Atwima Mponua 164,135 ■ ■
Ahafo Ano South West 69,532 ■ ■
Ahafo Ano North 98,047 ■ ■
Ahafo Ano South East 67,098 ■ ■
Offinso North 88,213 ■ ■
Offinso Municipal 145,124 ■ ■
Afigya Kwabre North 77,525 ■ ■
Sekyere South 126,944 ■ ■
Mampong Municipal 123,303 ■ ■
Ejura Sekyedumase 145,547 ■ Rural+
Sekyere Central 77,417 ■ Rural+
69.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.56
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Sekyere Afram Plains 35,127 ■ Rural+
Western North
Aowin Municipal 145,344 ■ ■
Sefwi Akontombra 72,738 ■ ■
Suaman 41,739 ■ ■
Bodi 71,712 ■ ■
Sefwi Wiawso 164,936 ■ ■
Bibiani Anhwiaso Bekwai 183,207 ■ ■
Juaboso 96,870 ■ ■
Bia West 126,392 ■ ■
Bia East 57,887 ■
Ahafo
Asunafo South 97,853 ■ ■
Asunafo North 161,419 ■ ■
Asutifi South 71,857 ■ ■
Asutifi North 78,497 ■ ■
Tano North 100,141 ■ ■
Tano South 92,833 ■ ■
Bono
Dormaa West 53,259 ■ ■
Dormaa Municipal 125,276 ■ ■
Dormaa East 75,475 ■ ■
Sunyani Municipal 215,195 ■ ■
Sunyani West 151,198 ■ ■
Berekum East Municipal 118,106 ■ ■
Berekum West 54,983 ■ ■
Jaman South 122,015 ■ ■
Jaman North 129,530 ■ ■
Tain 128,462 ■ ■
Wenchi Municipal 138,677 ■ ■
Banda 31,323 ■
Bono East
70.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.57
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Nkoranza South 128,082 ■ ■
Techiman Municipal 271,861 ■ ■
Nkoranza North 63,088 ■ ■
Techiman North 114,549 ■ ■
Atebubu Amantin 161,940 ■ ■
Sene West 78,323 ■ ■
Sene East 80,531 ■ ■
Pru West 78,005 ■ Rural+
Pru East 112,662 ■ Rural+
Kintampo South 98,746 ■ ■
Kintampo North 156,692 ■ Rural+
Oti
Biakoye 76,828 ■ ■
Jasikan 63,851 ■ ■
Kadjebi 79,109 ■ ■
Krachi East 118,124 ■ ■
Krachi West 65,384 ■ ■
Krachi Nchumuru 85,500 ■ ■
Nkwanta South 145,401 ■ ■
Nkwanta North 134,876 ■ ■
Guan 30,204 ■
Northern
Kpandai 145,936 ■ ■
Nanumba South 122,997 ■ ■
Nanumba North 218,165 ■ ■
Zabzugu 95,792 ■ ■
Tatale 86,495 ■ ■
Saboba 110,635 ■ ■
Yendi 178,552 ■ ■
Mion 109,764 ■ Rural+
Nanton 58,700 ■ ■
Tamale Metro 433,304 ■ ■
Sagnerigu 395,109 ■ ■
71.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.58
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Tolon 136,544 ■ Rural+
Kumbungu 127,867 ■ ■
Savelugu 142,091 ■ ■
Karaga 132,075 ■ Rural+
Gushiegu 178,025 ■ ■
Savannah
Bole 131,156 ■ ■
Sawla-Tuna-Kalba 127,605 ■ ■
North Gonja 69,592 ■ ■
West Gonja 71,864 ■ ■
Central Gonja 161,695 ■ ■
East Gonja 133,372 ■ Rural+
North East Gonja 44,630 ■
North East
Mamprugu Moagduri 78,285 ■ ■
West Mamprusi 200,142 ■ ■
East Mamprusi 214,095 ■ Rural+
Bunkpurugu Nakpanduri 93,815 ■ ■
Yunyoo Nasuan 64,771 ■
Chereponi 99,272 ■ ■
Upper East
Builsa South 39,950 ■ ■
Builsa North 61,791 ■ ■
Kasena Nankana Municipal 109,112 ■ ■
Kassena Nankana West 99,108 ■ ■
Bolgatanga Municipal 155,659 ■ ■
Talensi 95,051 ■ ■
Bolgatanga East 42,406 ■ ■
Bongo 127,175 ■ ■
Nabdam 57,933 ■
Bawku West 157,494 ■ ■
Binduri 83,755 ■
Bawku Municipal 130,481 ■ ■
72.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.59
District Population
Strictly
Rural
Urban
5,000
Urban with Basic
Facilities
Garu 78,397 ■ ■
Tempane 95,020 ■ Rural+
Pusiga 87,964 ■ ■
Upper West
Wa West 107,067 ■
Wa East 100,994 ■ ■
Wa Municipal 221,597 ■ ■
Nadowli-Kaleo 85,092 ■ ■
Daffiama Bussie 42,795 ■ Rural+
Sissala East 89,026 ■ ■
Sissala West 70,484 ■ ■
Jirapa 100,797 ■ ■
Lawra 64,526 ■ ■
Lambussie-Karni 56,448 ■ ■
Nandom 56,680 ■ ■
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.84
REFERENCES
Albuquerque, N., & Correia Guedes, M. (2021). Cities Without Slums and The Right to the City: Slums in sub-
Saharan Africa. Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability: 6(24)
https://doi.org/10.1051/rees/2021022
Census Office (1960). 1960 Population Census of Ghana, Accra. www2.statsghana.gov.gh/
Census Office (1971). 1970 Population Census of Ghana, Accra. www2.statsghana.gov.gh/
Elrayies, G.M. (2016). Rethinking Slums: An Approach for Slums Development Towards Sustainability. Journal of
Sustainable Development, 9(6), http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n6p225
Engstrom, R.; Sandborn, A., Yu, Q. Burgdorfer, J., Stow , D., Weeks, J. and Graesser, J. (2015). Mapping Slums
using Spatial Features in Accra, Ghana, 978-1-4799-6652-315, IEEE.
Ezeh, A., Oyebode, O., Satterthwaite, D., Chen, Y. F., Ndugwa, R., Sartori, J., Mberu, B., Melendez-Torres, G. J.,
Haregu, T., Watson, S. I., Caiaffa, W., Capon, A., & Lilford, R. J. (2017). The history, geography, and sociology
of slums and the health problems of people who live in slums. The Lancet, 389(10068), 547–558.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31650-6
Ghana Statistical Service (2024). Population Projections 2021-2050; Ghana 2021 Population and Housing
Census Reports, Accra; https://census2021.statsghana.gov.gh/
Ghana Statistical Service (2023). Ghana 2021 Population and Housing Census Thematic Report: Migration,
https://census2021.statsghana.gov.gh/
Ghana Statistical Service (2010). 2010 Population and Housing Census: Preliminary Report.
Ghana Urbanisation Think Tank (GUTT), 2019. Cities as a Strategic Resource: Guideline for Ghana’s National
Urban Policy Revision. Paper for the Coalition for Urban Transitions. London and Washington DC. Available at:
https://urbantransitions.global/publications/
Gilbert, A. (2007). The World's Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Habitat for Humanity International (2020). State of the World's Cities Report 2020.
Marx, B., Stoker, T. and Suri, T. (2013). The Economics of Slums in the Developing World Journal
of Economic Perspective; 27(4):187-210.
MLGRD (2012). National Urban Policy Framework, Accra www.mlgrd.gov.gh
Ministry of water resources, works and housing, (2015). National housing policy
National Development Planning Commission (2024). Vision 2057: Long Term National Perspective Framework,
Accra; www. Ndpc.gov.gh
Seto, K.C., Sanchez-Rodriguez, R. & Fragkias, M. (2010). The New Geography of Contemporary Urbanisation
and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35:167-94.
UN-Habitat (2020). The State of African Cities Report 2020.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2014). World Urbanisation
Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights. Report No. ST/ESA/SER.A/352.
World Bank (2020). Urbanisation Review: Accelerating Inclusive Growth in Ghana.
98.
GHANA STATISTICAL SERVICE.85
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
Name Email Institution Role
Dr. Alhassan Iddrisu alhassan.iddrisu@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service
Government
Statistician
Dr. Faustina Frempong-
Ainguah
faustina.frempong-
ainguah@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Lead Author
Mr. Simon T. Onilimor simon.onilimor@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Author
Mr. Pashur S. Akaho selaseh.akaho@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Author
Mr. Basil Tungbani basil.tungbani@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Author
Mrs. Jacqueline D. Anum jacqueline.anum@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Author
Mr. Edward O. Manu edward.manu@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Author
Prof. Stephen O. Kwankye skwankye@ug.edu.gh University of Ghana Reviewer
Prof. John K. Anarfi John_anarfi@yahoo.com Freelance Reviewer
Mr. Emmanuel G. Ossei emmanuel.ossei@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Reviewer
Mr. Godwin O. Gyebi godwin.gyebi@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Reviewer
Jemima Gyamesi jemima.gyamesi@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Reviewer
Mr. David M. Bessah david.bessah@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Reviewer
Mr. William K. Addo william.addo@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Reviewer
Mr. Eric N. Amoo eric.amoo@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Reviewer
Mr. Felix Adjei felix-adjei@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Graphic Design
Ms. Alberta Seckey alberta.seckey@statsghana.gov.gh
Ghana Statistical
Service Administrative Support