Aegis Growth Conference Investor Presentation October 2015
Energy subsidies in Oman - impact on national competitiveness
1. 1Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
Impact of energy subsidies on
Oman’s national competitiveness
Presentation for session one
May 2016
2. 2Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
Efforts to understand energy subsidies are complicated by the
difficulties associated with defining them in the first place
Subsidies can be defined by the type
of price-driven losses incurred…
Carbon tax and other
externalities
International
price
Cost of
production
Loss of
sustainable
competitiveness
Loss of
Revenue
Opportunities
Economic /
fiscal
loss
…and also by a wide range of
implementation tools
Direct
financial
transfers
Energy
sector
regulation
In-kind
subsidies
Credit subsidies
Passive management of
negative externalities
Cross
subsidies
High Transparency
Medium Transparency
Low Transparency
Relative price of energy sold
Prices
Instruments used to provide subsidies
Tax
conces-
sions
Source: SGI; IMF; IEA; World Bank; Monitor Deloitte analysis
3. 3Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
Opportunity Cost2 Sustainable
Competitiveness3
1) 2015 data by Oman Electricity Authority; 2) 2015 Opportunity cost calculated as difference between
domestic and international price multiplied by consumption. 3) 2015 IMF Estimates
Source: Oman Electricity Authority; IMF; IEA; World Bank; Monitor Deloitte analysis
Economic Loss1
545
8.000
6.000
10.000
5.000
4.000
3.000
9.000
7.000
1.000
0
2.000
430
1.163
4.370
2.192
1.1551.163
492
9.452
2.460
Oman subsidies, by type and energy
2015 (Mln. USD)
Electricity Natural GasOil Products
Preliminary calculation
45%
Types of
subsidies
26%
Congestion
15%
Global Warming
Foregone
consumption
Tax revenue
Local air pollution
Accidents
9%
4%
Oman Post-tax subsidies
by type 2015 (% of total)
7.750
Depending on the definition used the value of energy subsidies in
Oman is estimated to be in the range of ~1.2 to ~9.5 bln. USD
4. 4Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
1) Total of post tax and pretax subsidies. 2) The number for pre-tax subsidies estimated by Monitor Deloitte
Source: Oman Electricity Authority; IMF; IEA; World Bank; Monitor Deloitte analysis
Despite being lower than the GCC average, Oman has one of the
highest relative levels of energy subsidies in the world
775 456 6716353520 323324
5%
17%17%
20%
13%
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
3.500
4.500
3.000
2.000
1.000
500
2.500
4.000
1.500
0
Middle
East, NA &
Pakistan
(exl. GCC)
487
3%
5% 4%
782
Emerging
Europe
3.311
509
Emerging
Asia
241
CIS
1.719
Oman2
1.723
Advanced
Countries
Avg.
23
2.239
4.457
12%
1.964
1.273
GCC
1.250
111
1.146 390
Latin
America &
Caribbean
7
20
Africa
91
Pre-tax subsidies per capitaTotal subsidies as % of GDP Post-tax subsidies per capita
2015 Comparative subsidies per capita and as % of GDP
USD per capita % of GDP1
5. 5Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
Other
Though progress has been made to enhance transparency in how
subsidies are distributed, there is still a lack of clarity in some areas
Note: Energy flows relative flows are calculated based on IEA 2013 energy balance data.
Flow charts are simplified to exclude all single flows below 1 000 Mote. Subsidy flows are
for illustration purposes only
Source: IMF; IEA; World Bank; Monitor Deloitte analysis
Energy
Subsidies
Oil Production
Power
Generation
Refining
Export
Industry
Non Energy
Own Use
Gas Production
Losses
Exports
Imports
STATE
Cross
subsidies
Cross
subsidies
Energy
regulation
In-kind
subsidies
Tax
concessions
Credit
subsidies
Direct cash
transfer
Oman 2015 - Type
2 subsidy flows
~1.2 Bln USD
? Bln USD
~0.5 Bln USD
~0.5 Bln USD
Transport
6. 6Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
There are ways of untangling subsidies to elevate negative
socio-economic implications
Expand access
to energy
Avoid
inflationary
pressures
Protection of the
poor from high
energy prices
Foster industrial
development
Consumption
smoothing
o Phased approach to allow
industry time to adapt
o Extend and improve access to
credit
o Complementary monetary policy
changes to deal with inflationary
impacts
o Transfers: e.g. increase non-
taxable income;
introduce/increase minimum
wage; cash transfers for
vulnerable groups
o Infrastructure projects/investment
in order to ensure access to
electricity/fuel
Business/industry risks
o Temporary reduction in international
competiveness owing to higher
prices
INITIAL
RATIONALE
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH
“LIFTING” SUBSIDIES
MITIGATION
MECHANISMS
Macroeconomic risks
o Short-term negative consequences to
GDP
o Short-term inflation
o Short-term price volatility
Social welfare risks
o Reduced household incomes
o Unemployment as firms go out of
business
o Increased poverty levels
o Reduced access to energy
Source: GSI; IEA; Monitor Deloitte analysis
7. 7Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
Demand
conditions
Context for
Strategy
Factor
conditions
Related
industries
Wasteful
consumption of
main strategic
natural resources
Hazards negatively
affecting population
– strategic resource
High Value-Add,
innovative industries lack
stimuli for innovation
Energy consumers
are not provided with
stimuli to purchase
innovative
products and
services
Large corporations become
largely numb to risks associated
with market innovation
!
!!
Local competition and
trade is discouraged
(example – beneficial
power trade)
Effect of subsidies on
strategic competitiveness
factors in Oman
In addition to hindering the efficient use of economic resources
subsidies discourage progressive economic innovation
Potential intellectual
capital is not employed
in innovation
Source: GSI; IEA; Monitor Deloitte analysis
8. 8Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
One could argue that subsidies have already contributed to
offsetting Oman`s competitive advantage
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Institutions
Infrastructure
Macroeconomic
environment
Health and primary
eduction
Higher eduction and
training
Goods market
efficiency
Labor market efficiency
Financial market
development
Technological
readiness
Market size
Business sophistication
Innovation
Oman
31
36
19
66
88
52
89
103
71
64
62
45
Oman is already lagging in terms of innovation, labor market efficiency
and higher education standards - subsidies being a contributing factor
X Ranking of
Oman out of
140
countries
Oman Global Competitiveness index
performance 2015-2016
9. 9Deloitte & Touche (M.E.)
Closing remarks
Oman looses yearly around ~1.1 Bln USD, fiscally and ~2.2 Bln USD I
opportunity revenues even despite global fall of energy prices, that amounts to
~520 USD per capita per year including expatriates
Additional 7.2 Bln USD is “lost” essentially on account of the “future” meaning
deferred losses of the competitiveness of the economy. That represents ~1 700
USD per capita per year.
Those subsidies hit where it “hurts the most” – ability innovate and efficiency of
the higher education, while offsetting effect of favorable efficiency of the
institutions and natural resources
Therefore, arguably there is no such thing as efficient subsidy lift without
strong connection to country strategy, social and economic policy