This document is an application filed in court by Manjot Singh, proprietor of Sahil Trading Company against Nitin, Sameer Sharma, Navneet and others. Manjot alleges that the accused purchased batteries and inverters from his company totaling Rs. 45,43,770 but have not paid despite repeated requests. He further alleges that the accused threatened him and stopped business dealings, damaging his reputation. Manjot requests that an FIR be registered against the accused for criminal offenses including criminal breach of trust, cheating and criminal intimidation.
Final reply to icai behalf of ankit goel amendedKuldeepBatra
This document is a written response by Ankit Goel to a complaint filed against him by Tarun Kumar with the ICAI. It raises preliminary objections that the complaint is not maintainable and Tarun Kumar has concealed material facts. It then responds paragraph by paragraph, denying most of the allegations and providing explanations for financial transactions between the parties. It claims the complaint is due to personal grudges and asks for the complaint to be dismissed.
The petitioner Pushpalatha S filed a petition against respondent Guruswamy S under Section 125(1) of CrPC seeking maintenance. The petitioner and respondent got married on 12-08-2010 in a mass marriage ceremony registered in the Sub-Registrar office of Chamarajanagar. However, the respondent left the petitioner and started living separately without reasonable cause after 2 months of marriage. The petitioner has no independent source of income and is unable to maintain herself. Hence, the petitioner requested that the respondent be directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 5000 for her livelihood.
This include some important formats applicable in Indian courts and is very essential for Law Students.
These formats may even be translated to the local (scheduled) indian languages and may be used in the respective courts.
1. Arshad Mehmood has filed a habeas corpus petition in the Lahore High Court against the SHO and others regarding the illegal detention of his brother.
2. 10 days ago, the respondent police officer forcibly arrested Arshad's brother from the road in Chiniot when he was on his motorcycle, and has since kept him in illegal custody while transferring him between police stations.
3. Arshad's brother has not been involved in any criminal cases and is being illegally detained despite Arshad's requests for his release, which have been refused along with threats against his brother's life. Arshad seeks relief from the court.
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
This document is an order from the High Court of Kerala regarding a bail application filed by 3 applicants (Bhagyalakshmi K, Shajna N.S, and Sreelakshmi) who have been accused of offenses against a de facto complainant (Vijay P. Nair). The prosecution alleges that the applicants trespassed into the complainant's room, assaulted him, stole his devices, and humiliated him. The applicants claim they were invited to discuss a disparaging YouTube video made by the complainant about prominent feminists. They deny the allegations and say it is a counter-case. The court heard the arguments of both sides and reserved its order.
This document is a court order from a criminal application in the High Court of Bombay regarding an alleged fraud case. The order summarizes the allegations made by the complainant/informant Saniya against the three applicants for non-payment of over Rs. 2.8 crore for banana supplied by her to their transport business. It details the evidence produced by the informant including an agreement signed with one of the applicants and delivery records. The applicants deny the allegations and claim their business was only transport. The court directs the prosecution to present corroborating evidence linking the records to the allegations.
The document is a written argument submitted by Smita Sangita, the Accused No. 5, requesting discharge from a criminal case under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code. She argues that the charges filed against her as a director of Kasliwal Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. do not provide any evidence of her specific involvement in the alleged offenses of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and corruption. As a director in name only and not involved in the company's day-to-day operations or bank accounts, she should not be prosecuted merely due to her technical position in the company without evidence of her direct role in the criminal acts.
Final reply to icai behalf of ankit goel amendedKuldeepBatra
This document is a written response by Ankit Goel to a complaint filed against him by Tarun Kumar with the ICAI. It raises preliminary objections that the complaint is not maintainable and Tarun Kumar has concealed material facts. It then responds paragraph by paragraph, denying most of the allegations and providing explanations for financial transactions between the parties. It claims the complaint is due to personal grudges and asks for the complaint to be dismissed.
The petitioner Pushpalatha S filed a petition against respondent Guruswamy S under Section 125(1) of CrPC seeking maintenance. The petitioner and respondent got married on 12-08-2010 in a mass marriage ceremony registered in the Sub-Registrar office of Chamarajanagar. However, the respondent left the petitioner and started living separately without reasonable cause after 2 months of marriage. The petitioner has no independent source of income and is unable to maintain herself. Hence, the petitioner requested that the respondent be directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 5000 for her livelihood.
This include some important formats applicable in Indian courts and is very essential for Law Students.
These formats may even be translated to the local (scheduled) indian languages and may be used in the respective courts.
1. Arshad Mehmood has filed a habeas corpus petition in the Lahore High Court against the SHO and others regarding the illegal detention of his brother.
2. 10 days ago, the respondent police officer forcibly arrested Arshad's brother from the road in Chiniot when he was on his motorcycle, and has since kept him in illegal custody while transferring him between police stations.
3. Arshad's brother has not been involved in any criminal cases and is being illegally detained despite Arshad's requests for his release, which have been refused along with threats against his brother's life. Arshad seeks relief from the court.
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India judgment regarding a preventive detention order passed against a man under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act. The detention order was based on 5 FIRs filed against the man for cheating by collecting over 50 lakhs rupees from victims by promising high returns through stock market investments. The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the detention order. The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal of that dismissal.
This document is an order from the High Court of Kerala regarding a bail application filed by 3 applicants (Bhagyalakshmi K, Shajna N.S, and Sreelakshmi) who have been accused of offenses against a de facto complainant (Vijay P. Nair). The prosecution alleges that the applicants trespassed into the complainant's room, assaulted him, stole his devices, and humiliated him. The applicants claim they were invited to discuss a disparaging YouTube video made by the complainant about prominent feminists. They deny the allegations and say it is a counter-case. The court heard the arguments of both sides and reserved its order.
This document is a court order from a criminal application in the High Court of Bombay regarding an alleged fraud case. The order summarizes the allegations made by the complainant/informant Saniya against the three applicants for non-payment of over Rs. 2.8 crore for banana supplied by her to their transport business. It details the evidence produced by the informant including an agreement signed with one of the applicants and delivery records. The applicants deny the allegations and claim their business was only transport. The court directs the prosecution to present corroborating evidence linking the records to the allegations.
The document is a written argument submitted by Smita Sangita, the Accused No. 5, requesting discharge from a criminal case under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code. She argues that the charges filed against her as a director of Kasliwal Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. do not provide any evidence of her specific involvement in the alleged offenses of criminal breach of trust, cheating, and corruption. As a director in name only and not involved in the company's day-to-day operations or bank accounts, she should not be prosecuted merely due to her technical position in the company without evidence of her direct role in the criminal acts.
The document is a court order granting bail to Sidhique Kappan, who was accused of money laundering by the Enforcement Directorate. The court summarized the ED's allegations that Kappan was part of a conspiracy involving over Rs. 1 crore in criminal proceeds related to unlawful activities. However, the court found that except for Rs. 5,000 transferred to a co-accused, no transactions were shown in Kappan's account. Given this and that the conditions for denying bail under the PMLA were not met, the court granted Kappan bail with certain conditions like appearing before the trial court on scheduled dates.
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Mandeep Puniya, a freelance journalist arrested for offenses including obstructing a public servant during a protest at Singhu Border in Delhi. While the defense argued Puniya was wrongly arrested and should be granted bail, the prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may instigate further protests. The judge ultimately granted bail to Puniya with conditions, noting he is a journalist and keeping him in custody would serve no purpose.
This document is an order from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay summarizing a criminal application seeking to quash a domestic violence case. In 3 sentences:
The application was filed to quash an FIR and criminal proceedings regarding allegations of domestic violence, harassment, and cruelty filed by the applicant's wife against the applicant and his family members. The court analyzed the allegations and evidence in detail and found the allegations to be vague and not sufficient to attract the necessary ingredients of the offenses charged. Therefore, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings.
Delhi hc bail granted to pocso accused ordersabrangsabrang
The petitioner applied for bail in a case involving rape and POCSO charges. The prosecution argued the petitioner was seen sexually assaulting the victim, aged 2.5 years, and was beaten by neighbors before arrest. However, the court notes contradictions in evidence like the CCTV footage and MLC report not showing intoxication or injuries from beating. Considering the delay in FIR registration and age of victim preventing statement, the court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond while not commenting on the merits of the case.
The document contains 20 case studies from Aireen P. Hernandez, RSW regarding clients seeking financial assistance for medical expenses. Each case study provides identifying information of the client, the problem presented, findings that the client belongs to a low income family, and a recommendation to provide financial assistance through Serbisyong Suarez office. The clients presented with medical issues such as stroke, pneumonia, infection, need for operation, premature birth, and more. In each case, the client's family was found to be economically and financially incapacitated.
OPEN LETTER TO MR. ANAND GOPAL MAHINDRA, EX-DIRECTOR OF KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK L...Ionic Radiation
This document is an open letter from Dr. Santosh Kumar Bagla, Smt. Pushpa Bagla, and Bhupendra Bagla (the applicants) to Mr. Anand Gopal Mahindra, the former director of Kotak Mahindra Bank. The applicants allege that Kotak Mahindra Bank committed fraud, forgery, and illegal acts against them which ruined their lives. They have filed an FIR and legal complaints against the bank and its officials. The letter asks Mr. Mahindra 16 questions regarding his role as a director of the bank at the relevant time and why he did not take action against errant bank officials.
Humberside Police Appeals Body outcome (4 April, 2019) to appeal against the decision of Humberside Police's Professional Standards department (PSD) in respect of a complaint (ref: CO/498/17). This matter concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 14 July 2017 raising issues about the PSD and an Investigating Officer who had not bothered to open a previous conduct complaint file until 370 days after it had been allocated to him. The present matter required by law to be referred to the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC). However, the force wrongly categorised the complaint effectively downplaying the seriousness of it, thus enabling it to be dealt with by way of Local Resolution (not fully investigated). Further mishandling followed, presumably as a deliberate tactic to delay and obfuscate the process due to the seriousness of the allegations. As a consequence it has been referred back twice to the PSD to be dealt with appropriately and has so far (17 March 2020) been ongoing 977 days
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took placeS.Ezhil Raj
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 9TH JANUARY 2016Om Prakash Poddar
1. Om Prakash has filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India challenging his illegal termination from Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in 2014 without notice or compensation.
2. He had previously filed a lawsuit in the Patiala House Court in New Delhi regarding his termination, but alleges the court is pressuring him to withdraw key aspects of his case or transfer it to the Delhi High Court.
3. Prakash claims his termination and the court's actions violate his fundamental rights to equality, non-discrimination, and life and liberty under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. He is asking the Supreme Court to intervene.
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
This document summarizes a court case involving the petitioner Arun Sharma filing a writ petition against the state of Madhya Pradesh and others regarding violations of his rights. The petitioner alleges that police forcibly evicted him from his shop, detained and beat him, and published his photo identifying him as a criminal without cause. The court discusses the issues raised and arguments made by amicus curiae that publishing photos and details of an accused person violates their fundamental rights and privacy unless convicted. The court is considering whether executive instructions can override constitutional rights and whether compensation is due for rights violations of an innocent person.
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court determined that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age and the marriage broker arranging the marriage were not appropriate for a court direction to the police. Instead, the court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court.
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015S.Ezhil Raj
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court denied the request, noting that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age at marriage were not a fit case for a positive direction to the police. The court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court instead.
Application form-for-financial-assistance-to-self-owned-auto-taxi-maxi-cab-dr...Md Baig
This document is an application form for financial assistance to self-owned auto, taxi, or maxi cab drivers in Andhra Pradesh. It requests information such as the applicant's name, ration card number, family details, address, vehicle details, driving license details, caste, and bank account information. The applicant must enclose copies of documents like their ration card, Aadhar card, caste certificate, vehicle registration, driving license, and bank passbook. Officials will verify that the applicant's name matches the documents and determine if the application should be recommended or rejected for assistance.
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
A defamation case filed in India court against Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook Indian Operations and the court summoned them on September 3 2012. Below is the link and share valuable comment!!!
http://pulse2.com/2012/08/29/pradeep-manukonda-files-defamation-lawsuit/
http://www.scribd.com/collections/3783629/mark-zuckerberg-pradeep-kumar-manukonda
Mark zuckerberg obtain a restraining order against Pradeep Manukonda stating him as a stalker in 2011 Now Pradeep Manukonda filed a defamation case against him in Indian court
This code of conduct outlines 23 rules for outsourced collection agencies and their employees when collecting outstanding dues from subscribers of Reliance Communications Ltd. Key rules include: treating all subscribers with respect and dignity; no threats, abuse or intimidation; providing identification and limiting contact hours; not harassing family or sharing customer information; and following proper procedures for payments, disputes, and legal notices.
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
1. The document details a court order regarding an application filed under Section 156(3) of the CrPC by the complainant Saleem seeking directions for the registration of an FIR for offenses allegedly committed against him.
2. The complainant alleges that in February 2020, during communal riots in Delhi, some neighbors attacked his home with guns, stones, and petrol bombs. He called the police for help but no one arrived.
3. The court examines the complainant's application, the police report, and video evidence. It discusses relevant sections of the CrPC regarding police investigation and registration of FIRs. The court will further examine the matter and issue directions.
न्यायालय को सुल्तान के आचरण पर संदेह करने का कोई कारण नहीं मिला और साथ ही उसके न्याय से भागने की कोई संभावना नहीं थी, फिर भी जमानत की शर्तों के रूप में सुल्तान की संचार विधियों और गतिविधियों पर कड़े प्रतिबंध लगाए गए।
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
The document is a court order granting bail to Sidhique Kappan, who was accused of money laundering by the Enforcement Directorate. The court summarized the ED's allegations that Kappan was part of a conspiracy involving over Rs. 1 crore in criminal proceeds related to unlawful activities. However, the court found that except for Rs. 5,000 transferred to a co-accused, no transactions were shown in Kappan's account. Given this and that the conditions for denying bail under the PMLA were not met, the court granted Kappan bail with certain conditions like appearing before the trial court on scheduled dates.
The document discusses a bail application hearing for Mandeep Puniya, a freelance journalist arrested for offenses including obstructing a public servant during a protest at Singhu Border in Delhi. While the defense argued Puniya was wrongly arrested and should be granted bail, the prosecution opposed bail, arguing he may instigate further protests. The judge ultimately granted bail to Puniya with conditions, noting he is a journalist and keeping him in custody would serve no purpose.
This document is an order from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay summarizing a criminal application seeking to quash a domestic violence case. In 3 sentences:
The application was filed to quash an FIR and criminal proceedings regarding allegations of domestic violence, harassment, and cruelty filed by the applicant's wife against the applicant and his family members. The court analyzed the allegations and evidence in detail and found the allegations to be vague and not sufficient to attract the necessary ingredients of the offenses charged. Therefore, the court allowed the application and quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings.
Delhi hc bail granted to pocso accused ordersabrangsabrang
The petitioner applied for bail in a case involving rape and POCSO charges. The prosecution argued the petitioner was seen sexually assaulting the victim, aged 2.5 years, and was beaten by neighbors before arrest. However, the court notes contradictions in evidence like the CCTV footage and MLC report not showing intoxication or injuries from beating. Considering the delay in FIR registration and age of victim preventing statement, the court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond while not commenting on the merits of the case.
The document contains 20 case studies from Aireen P. Hernandez, RSW regarding clients seeking financial assistance for medical expenses. Each case study provides identifying information of the client, the problem presented, findings that the client belongs to a low income family, and a recommendation to provide financial assistance through Serbisyong Suarez office. The clients presented with medical issues such as stroke, pneumonia, infection, need for operation, premature birth, and more. In each case, the client's family was found to be economically and financially incapacitated.
OPEN LETTER TO MR. ANAND GOPAL MAHINDRA, EX-DIRECTOR OF KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK L...Ionic Radiation
This document is an open letter from Dr. Santosh Kumar Bagla, Smt. Pushpa Bagla, and Bhupendra Bagla (the applicants) to Mr. Anand Gopal Mahindra, the former director of Kotak Mahindra Bank. The applicants allege that Kotak Mahindra Bank committed fraud, forgery, and illegal acts against them which ruined their lives. They have filed an FIR and legal complaints against the bank and its officials. The letter asks Mr. Mahindra 16 questions regarding his role as a director of the bank at the relevant time and why he did not take action against errant bank officials.
Humberside Police Appeals Body outcome (4 April, 2019) to appeal against the decision of Humberside Police's Professional Standards department (PSD) in respect of a complaint (ref: CO/498/17). This matter concerns a police conduct complaint submitted 14 July 2017 raising issues about the PSD and an Investigating Officer who had not bothered to open a previous conduct complaint file until 370 days after it had been allocated to him. The present matter required by law to be referred to the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC). However, the force wrongly categorised the complaint effectively downplaying the seriousness of it, thus enabling it to be dealt with by way of Local Resolution (not fully investigated). Further mishandling followed, presumably as a deliberate tactic to delay and obfuscate the process due to the seriousness of the allegations. As a consequence it has been referred back twice to the PSD to be dealt with appropriately and has so far (17 March 2020) been ongoing 977 days
under the influence of alcohol or not when the accident took placeS.Ezhil Raj
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking to remove the allegation from an FIR that he was driving under the influence at the time of a car accident. The court denied the request, stating that the allegation is part of the complainant's version and subject to ongoing investigation. While the allegation alone does not prove drunken driving or prevent an insurance claim, it is not appropriate for the court to remove a statement that is being investigated. The petition was therefore closed without modifying the FIR.
LETTER PETITION IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DATED 9TH JANUARY 2016Om Prakash Poddar
1. Om Prakash has filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India challenging his illegal termination from Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. in 2014 without notice or compensation.
2. He had previously filed a lawsuit in the Patiala House Court in New Delhi regarding his termination, but alleges the court is pressuring him to withdraw key aspects of his case or transfer it to the Delhi High Court.
3. Prakash claims his termination and the court's actions violate his fundamental rights to equality, non-discrimination, and life and liberty under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. He is asking the Supreme Court to intervene.
1. The court ordered an inquiry into the arrest of four petitioners by police authorities in Gujarat, as the court believes this was a case of extreme excess and the petitioners appear to be victims due to their birth in a particular community.
2. While independent witnesses said the petitioners earned an honest living, police implicated them in around 5 cases based only on their confessions obtained through torture. The petitioners were acquitted in all cases by trial courts.
3. The court ordered the Inspector General of Police to conduct an inquiry and submit an affidavit regarding any excess committed by police in arresting and implicating the petitioners. The court will then decide on action against police officers and compensation for the petition
This document summarizes a court case involving the petitioner Arun Sharma filing a writ petition against the state of Madhya Pradesh and others regarding violations of his rights. The petitioner alleges that police forcibly evicted him from his shop, detained and beat him, and published his photo identifying him as a criminal without cause. The court discusses the issues raised and arguments made by amicus curiae that publishing photos and details of an accused person violates their fundamental rights and privacy unless convicted. The court is considering whether executive instructions can override constitutional rights and whether compensation is due for rights violations of an innocent person.
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court determined that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age and the marriage broker arranging the marriage were not appropriate for a court direction to the police. Instead, the court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court.
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015S.Ezhil Raj
The petitioner sought a direction from the court to order the police to register an FIR, investigate, and file a final report based on his complaint from December 2011. However, the court denied the request, noting that the allegations of the wife suppressing her age at marriage were not a fit case for a positive direction to the police. The court closed the case while allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies through the Family Court instead.
Application form-for-financial-assistance-to-self-owned-auto-taxi-maxi-cab-dr...Md Baig
This document is an application form for financial assistance to self-owned auto, taxi, or maxi cab drivers in Andhra Pradesh. It requests information such as the applicant's name, ration card number, family details, address, vehicle details, driving license details, caste, and bank account information. The applicant must enclose copies of documents like their ration card, Aadhar card, caste certificate, vehicle registration, driving license, and bank passbook. Officials will verify that the applicant's name matches the documents and determine if the application should be recommended or rejected for assistance.
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court to quash an FIR registered against him and others for conducting a peaceful demonstration against the CAA and NRC amendments. While there was prima facie evidence for an FIR, the court noted that no untoward incidents occurred during the peaceful protest. Since continued prosecution was not warranted given the lack of violence, the court quashed the FIR to secure the ends of justice, with the benefit also applying to the non-petitioning accused mentioned in the FIR.
A defamation case filed in India court against Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook Indian Operations and the court summoned them on September 3 2012. Below is the link and share valuable comment!!!
http://pulse2.com/2012/08/29/pradeep-manukonda-files-defamation-lawsuit/
http://www.scribd.com/collections/3783629/mark-zuckerberg-pradeep-kumar-manukonda
Mark zuckerberg obtain a restraining order against Pradeep Manukonda stating him as a stalker in 2011 Now Pradeep Manukonda filed a defamation case against him in Indian court
This code of conduct outlines 23 rules for outsourced collection agencies and their employees when collecting outstanding dues from subscribers of Reliance Communications Ltd. Key rules include: treating all subscribers with respect and dignity; no threats, abuse or intimidation; providing identification and limiting contact hours; not harassing family or sharing customer information; and following proper procedures for payments, disputes, and legal notices.
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
1. The document details a court order regarding an application filed under Section 156(3) of the CrPC by the complainant Saleem seeking directions for the registration of an FIR for offenses allegedly committed against him.
2. The complainant alleges that in February 2020, during communal riots in Delhi, some neighbors attacked his home with guns, stones, and petrol bombs. He called the police for help but no one arrived.
3. The court examines the complainant's application, the police report, and video evidence. It discusses relevant sections of the CrPC regarding police investigation and registration of FIRs. The court will further examine the matter and issue directions.
न्यायालय को सुल्तान के आचरण पर संदेह करने का कोई कारण नहीं मिला और साथ ही उसके न्याय से भागने की कोई संभावना नहीं थी, फिर भी जमानत की शर्तों के रूप में सुल्तान की संचार विधियों और गतिविधियों पर कड़े प्रतिबंध लगाए गए।
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
156(3) appl (1).pdf
1. IN THE COURT OF ILLAQA/DUTY MAGISTRATE LUDHIANA
Manjot Singh, proprietor of Sahil Trading
Company, Chandigarh Road, Main Jamalpur Chowk,
Ludhiana.
……..Applicant
VERSUS
1.Nitin (ASM)/Authorized Officer of Livfast
Batteries Pvt. Ltd., #Haider Enclave,
Ladian Kalan, Hussainpur Road, Ludhiana-
141008 C/o Grewal Electronic Point, Mobile
No.9888045365,
2.Sameer Sharma (National Head)/Authorized
Officer of Livfast Batteries Pvt. Ltd.,
#Haider Enclave, Ladian Kalan, Hussainpur
Road, Ludhiana-141008, C/o Grewal
Electronic Point,
3.Navneet (TSI)/Authorized Officer of Livfast
Batteries Pvt. Ltd., #Haider Enclave,
Ladian Kalan, Hussainpur Road, Ludhiana-
141008, C/o Grewal Electronic Point, Mobile
No.9627632376,
IInd Address:-Opposite New Bus Stand,
Ludhiana-148101,
4.Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., 1-
Think Techno Campus, Building A, 4th Floor.
Off Pokharan Road 2, Subhash Nagar, Near
Yantra Park, Thane (W), 400607 through its
Chairman/ Managing Director/ authorised
signatory,
2. 5.Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd.,
Feroze Gandhi Market, Ludhaina through its
Branch Manager/ authorised signatory;
6.Arihant Collection, #Opposite Pal
Departmental Store, Haibowal, Ludhiana.
……..Accused
Application under section
156(3) Cr.P.C. for issuance
of direction to S.H.O. Police
Station Jamalpur, District
Ludhiana to register FIR
against the accused U/s 406,
420, 467, 468, 471, 499, 500,
120-B IPC and under the other
relevant sections of the law
of land.
Sir,
The applicant respectfully submits as
under:-
1.That the applicant is peace loving and law
abiding citizens of India.
2.That the applicant is the Proprietor of
Sahil Trading Company, and he is the
manufacturer of Batteries and Invertors and
accused no.1 to 3 are in the business
dealings and purchased batteries and
invertors on credit basis time to time from
the applicant. Lastly accused no.1 to 3 has
purchased batteries/invertors on credit
3. basis from the year 2013 to till date. The
applicant maintaining his account, in his
account books and as per account maintain
by the applicant a sum of Rs.45,43,770/- is
outstanding against you since 2018.
3.That the applicant doing the business with
accused no.1 to 3 from the last 13 years,
thereafter the intention of the accused
No.1 to 3 become dishonest and with their
pre-planned manner they in connivance with
accused No.4 and 5 to make my client’s firm
their authorized distributor and enticed
him to work on a large scale, on the basis
of which accused no.1 told the applicant
that he will give loan to him for his firm
from the accused no.4 and 5 Tata Company,
due to which the applicant believing on his
statement to be true, accused no.1 provide
him loan no.CED000006659 for an amount of
Rs.1,23,000/- on dated 28-09-2020 as
Channel Finance Loan from the accused no.4
and 5. Alongwith this, accused no.1 also
kept some blank cheques no.373820 to 373870
as security alongwith the above loan and
accused no.4 and 5 also kept them as
security and accused no.1 became himself as
a grantor in it. All the accused persons
have made the applicant’s financial
condition very serious by investing a lot
of money in market/business and the
applicant requested accused no.1 to 3
several times to give him some relief in
business, but accused no.1 to 3 always used
4. to put off the applicant by saying that you
should survive for a little more time. One
day again the applicant was told to accused
no.1 about his financial hardship, then
accused no.1 to 3 stopped their business
dealing with the applicant on 09-05-2023,
while the applicant has taken many other
loans from other banks to deposit the loan
amount taken from accused no.4 and 5, but
accused no.4 and 5 passed the security
cheques to the accused no.1 which were
given by the applicant at the time of loan,
with the intention to cheat him instead of
awarding him for his hard work, without
informing to my client and without his
consent, accused no.1 made new distributor
of accused no.6. Accused no.1 to 5 has
started doing the business with the accused
no.6 without getting any NOC from the
applicant.
4.That accused no.1 to 5 alongwith accused
no.6 are sharing all the personal
information of the applicant regarding the
business/trade of the applicant and
inciting the clients of the applicant
towards the applicant for the amounts which
the applicant supposed to collect from his
clients and forbidding them to pay the
amounts. Accused no.4 and 5 have incurred a
liability of Rs.1,17,85,744.69/- illegally,
forcibly and without due course of law
towards the applicant. While the applicant
has given a large scale business to accused
5. no.1 by doing business in every village,
street, mohalla, city, district to raise
the name of the company by which he giving
profit to accused persons in crores, but
due to their illegal behavior, the
applicant is mentally disturbed and he have
been physically and financially very
disturbed, due to which the applicant has
requested many times to the accused no.1
that the applicant is not in a position to
deposit the due amount but accused no.1 to
3 have been delaying him for the last one
year. Due to the behavior of all accused
persons, the applicant is facing a lot of
problems and whatever advance has been
taken from the clients has also reached the
point of turning it back, due to which the
applicant’s reputation and status is
getting damaged a lot. It is pertinent to
mention here that on 30-03-2023 a written
Representation/Memorandum was sent by the
applicant’s firm to accused no.1 to 5 that
the applicant has worked very hard and he
have made his name very difficult in the
eyes of public and your company. Due to
which his understanding and distress,
accused no.1 believed in getting him out of
this economic crisis, but accused no.1 did
not give any answer to the applicant in
this regard.
5.That it is further mention here that the
applicant’s company has a very good CIBIL
score, which clearly shows that its record
6. in the market is very good and not only
that, the applicant has also filing his
business tax returns time to time as per
instructions given by the Government of
India and the Government of Punjab, due to
which the applicant has never allowed to
anyone to be tarnished the image of his
firm/company in terms of transactions.
6.That now accused no.1 to 3 blackmail the
applicant by threatening to make full
payment and try to misappropriate his
cheques, his respect among some of the
applicant’s clients and old acquaintances
nearby. All accused are trying to defame
his reputation among the people and by
giving threats to defame his respect
through advertise in social media and
newspapers and threatened to implicate the
applicant in a false case and try to abuse
him and threaten to kill him. If the
applicant suffers any loss of life or
property then all of accused will be
responsible because they have caused the
applicant a great mental, physical and
financial damage, which is impossible to
bear.
7.That now all the accused persons have
failed to make the loan payment of the
aforesaid amount and as such the applicant
has become entitled to claim interest from
7. all accused persons at the rate of 18% per
annum as mentioned in the invoice.
8.That the applicant requested the accused
several times to pay the aforesaid amount
alongwith interest accrued thereon at the
rate of 18% per annum, but accused have
turned a deaf ear to towards the request of
the applicant.
It is pertinent to mention here
that the said amount is also invested by
the applicant by taking Limits from bank,
friends and other institutions etc.
9.That now the accused No.1 to 6 in
connivance with each other threatening the
applicant that in case he do not release
authorized dealer then the applicant will
be done to death and as such the applicant
is every apprehension that the accused No.1
to 3 in connivance with each other kill the
applicant for their benefit. It is
pertinent to mention here that when the
applicant start his other business then the
accused No.1 to 3 interfere in doing the
business and threatening the applicant that
he will not do any business to the
applicant.
10. That on 24.05.2023, the applicant moved
an application no.169776 before the
Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana by way of
8. registered post, copy of the said receipt
is enclosed herewith, but the police did
not take any action against the accused as
the accused are having influential
approach.
11. That the said application is required
to be forwarded to the S.H.O. P.S.Jamalpur,
District Ludhiana for registration of case
against the accused under section 156(3)
Cr.P.C. in the interest of justice.
12. That the norms of law, justice and
equity, forwarding of complaint to the
S.H.O. P.S.Jamalpur District Ludhiana
It is, therefore, prayed that the
application of the applicant may kindly be
forwarded to the S.H.O. P.S.Jamalpur
District Ludhiana for registration of FIR
U/s 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 499, 500, 120-
B IPC and under the other relevant sections
of the law of land against the accused
persons, in the interest of justice.
Applicant
Through Counsel
Dated:-
Mohit Nagrath, Advocate