Temporal bone trauma can cause a wide range of clinical issues including hearing loss, dizziness, CSF leakage, and facial nerve injuries. Proper evaluation involves thorough physical examination, imaging such as CT or MRI, and audiometric testing. Most longitudinal fractures heal well with conservative treatment, while transverse fractures often cause sensorineural hearing loss. CSF otorrhea typically stops within 2 weeks but may require surgery if persistent. Facial nerve function is a key prognostic indicator, and early intervention can improve outcomes.
Call Girls in Delhi Triveni Complex Escort Service(🔝))/WhatsApp 97111⇛47426
13temporalbonetrauma-100415230612-phpapp01-5.pdf
1. Temporal Bone Trauma
Temporal Bone Trauma
October 12, 2005
October 12, 2005
Steven T. Wright, M.D.
Steven T. Wright, M.D.
Matthew Ryan, M.D.
Matthew Ryan, M.D.
2. Temporal Bone Trauma
Temporal Bone Trauma
Wide spectrum of
Wide spectrum of
clinical findings
clinical findings
Knowledge of the
Knowledge of the
anatomy is vital to
anatomy is vital to
proper diagnosis and
proper diagnosis and
appropriate
appropriate
management
management
3. Incidence and Epidemiology
Incidence and Epidemiology
Motorized Transportation
Motorized Transportation
30-75% of blunt head trauma had associated
30-75% of blunt head trauma had associated
temporal bone trauma
temporal bone trauma
Penetrating Trauma
Penetrating Trauma
More dismal prognosis
More dismal prognosis
Barotrauma
Barotrauma
Inner ear decompression sickness
Inner ear decompression sickness
• The “bends”
The “bends”
Perilymphatic fistula
Perilymphatic fistula
Blast Injuries
Blast Injuries
4. Evaluation and Management
Evaluation and Management
ATLS
ATLS
Airway
Airway
Breathing
Breathing
Circulation
Circulation
H & P
H & P
Thorough head & neck
Thorough head & neck
examination
examination
8. Longitudinal fractures
Longitudinal fractures
80% of Temporal
80% of Temporal
Bone Fractures
Bone Fractures
Lateral Forces along
Lateral Forces along
the petrosquamous
the petrosquamous
suture line
suture line
15-20% Facial Nerve
15-20% Facial Nerve
involvement
involvement
EAC laceration
EAC laceration
9. Transverse fractures
Transverse fractures
20% of Temporal
20% of Temporal
Bone Fractures
Bone Fractures
Forces in the Antero-
Forces in the Antero-
Posterior direction
Posterior direction
50% Facial Nerve
50% Facial Nerve
Involvement
Involvement
EAC intact
EAC intact
10. Temporal Bone Trauma
Temporal Bone Trauma
Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss
Dizziness/Vertigo
Dizziness/Vertigo
CSF Otorrhea
CSF Otorrhea
Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve Injuries
11. Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss
Formal Audiometry
Formal Audiometry
vs. Tuning Fork
vs. Tuning Fork
71% of patients with
71% of patients with
Temporal Bone
Temporal Bone
Trauma have hearing
Trauma have hearing
loss
loss
TM Perforations
TM Perforations
CHL > 40db
CHL > 40db
suspicious for
suspicious for
ossicular discontinuity
ossicular discontinuity
12. Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss
Longitudinal Fractures
Longitudinal Fractures
Conductive or mixed hearing loss
Conductive or mixed hearing loss
80% of CHL resolve spontaneously
80% of CHL resolve spontaneously
Transverse Fractures
Transverse Fractures
Sensorineural hearing loss
Sensorineural hearing loss
Less likely to improve
Less likely to improve
13. Hearing Loss
Hearing Loss
Tympanic Membrane Perforations
Tympanic Membrane Perforations
Ossicular fracture or discontinuity
Ossicular fracture or discontinuity
Hemotympanum
Hemotympanum
Treatment:
Treatment:
Observation
Observation
Otic solutions may only mask CSF leaks
Otic solutions may only mask CSF leaks
14. Dizziness
Dizziness
Fracture through the otic capsule or a
Fracture through the otic capsule or a
labyrinthine concussion
labyrinthine concussion
Difficult diagnosis- bed rest, obtundation,
Difficult diagnosis- bed rest, obtundation,
sedation
sedation
Treatment: reserved for vomiting,
Treatment: reserved for vomiting,
limitation of activity
limitation of activity
Vestibular suppressants
Vestibular suppressants
Allow for maximal central compensation
Allow for maximal central compensation
15. Dizziness
Dizziness
Perilymphatic Fistulas
Perilymphatic Fistulas
SCUBA diver with ETD
SCUBA diver with ETD
Fluctuating dizziness and/or hearing
Fluctuating dizziness and/or hearing
loss
loss
Tullio’s Phenomenon
Tullio’s Phenomenon
Management
Management
• Conservative treatment in first 10-14 days
Conservative treatment in first 10-14 days
• 40% spontaneously close
40% spontaneously close
• Surgical management for persistent
Surgical management for persistent
vertigo or hearing loss
vertigo or hearing loss
• Regardless of visualization of fistula site,
Regardless of visualization of fistula site,
the majority of patients get better
the majority of patients get better
16. Dizziness
Dizziness
Inner Ear
Inner Ear
Decompression
Decompression
Sickness
Sickness
Too rapid an ascent
Too rapid an ascent
leads to percolation of
leads to percolation of
nitrogen bubbles within
nitrogen bubbles within
the otic capsule.
the otic capsule.
Greater than 30 ft….
Greater than 30 ft….
Decompression stages
Decompression stages
upon ascent are
upon ascent are
needed
needed
17. Dizziness
Dizziness
BPPV
BPPV
Acute, latent, and
Acute, latent, and
fatiguable vertigo
fatiguable vertigo
Can occur any time
Can occur any time
following injury
following injury
Dix Hallpike
Dix Hallpike
Epley Maneuver
Epley Maneuver
18. CSF Otorrhea
CSF Otorrhea
Acquired
Acquired
Postoperative (58%)
Postoperative (58%)
Trauma (32%)
Trauma (32%)
Nontraumatic (11%)
Nontraumatic (11%)
Spontaneous
Spontaneous
Bony defect theory
Bony defect theory
Arachnoid granulation theory
Arachnoid granulation theory
19. Temporal bone fractures
Temporal bone fractures
Longitudinal
Longitudinal
80% of Temp bone fx
80% of Temp bone fx
Anterior to otic capsule
Anterior to otic capsule
Involve the dura of the
Involve the dura of the
middle fossa
middle fossa
20. Temporal bone fractures
Temporal bone fractures
Transverse
Transverse
20% of Temp bone fx
20% of Temp bone fx
High rate of SNHL due
High rate of SNHL due
to violation of the otic
to violation of the otic
capsule
capsule
50% facial nerve
50% facial nerve
involvement
involvement
21. Testing of Nasal Secretions
Testing of Nasal Secretions
Beta-2-transferrin is highly sensitive and
Beta-2-transferrin is highly sensitive and
specific
specific
1/50
1/50th
th
of a drop
of a drop
Gold top tube, may need to send a sample of
Gold top tube, may need to send a sample of
the patients serum also.
the patients serum also.
Found in Vitreous Humor, Perilymph, CSF
Found in Vitreous Humor, Perilymph, CSF
Electronic nose has shown early success
Electronic nose has shown early success
Faster (<24hrs)
Faster (<24hrs)
Very Accurate
Very Accurate
23. Imaging
Imaging
Slow flow MRI
Slow flow MRI
Diffusion weighted
Diffusion weighted
MRI
MRI
Fluid motion down to
Fluid motion down to
0.5mm/sec
0.5mm/sec
Ex. MRA/MRV
Ex. MRA/MRV
24. Treatment of CSF Otorrhea
Treatment of CSF Otorrhea
Conservative measures
Conservative measures
Bed rest/Elev HOB>30
Bed rest/Elev HOB>30
Stool softeners
Stool softeners
No sneezing/coughing
No sneezing/coughing
+/- lumbar drains
+/- lumbar drains
Early failures
Early failures
Assoc with hydrocephalus
Assoc with hydrocephalus
Recurrent or persistent leaks
Recurrent or persistent leaks
25. Treatment of CSF Otorrhea
Treatment of CSF Otorrhea
Brodie and Thompson et al.
Brodie and Thompson et al.
820 T-bone fractures/122 CSF leaks
820 T-bone fractures/122 CSF leaks
Spontaneous resolution with conservative
Spontaneous resolution with conservative
measures
measures
95/122 (78%): within 7 days
95/122 (78%): within 7 days
21/122(17%): between 7-14 days
21/122(17%): between 7-14 days
5/122(4%): Persisted beyond 2 weeks
5/122(4%): Persisted beyond 2 weeks
26. Temporal bone fractures
Temporal bone fractures
Meningitis
Meningitis
9/121 (7%) developed meningitis. Found no
9/121 (7%) developed meningitis. Found no
significant difference in the rate of meningitis
significant difference in the rate of meningitis
in the ABX group versus no ABX group.
in the ABX group versus no ABX group.
A later meta-analysis by the same author
A later meta-analysis by the same author
did reveal a statistically significant
did reveal a statistically significant
reduction in the incidence of meningitis
reduction in the incidence of meningitis
with the use of prophylactic antibiotics.
with the use of prophylactic antibiotics.
27. Pediatric temporal bone fractures
Pediatric temporal bone fractures
Much lower incidence (10:1, adult:pedi)
Much lower incidence (10:1, adult:pedi)
Undeveloped sinuses, skull flexibility
Undeveloped sinuses, skull flexibility
otorrhea>> rhinorrhea
otorrhea>> rhinorrhea
Prophylactic antibiotics did not influence
Prophylactic antibiotics did not influence
the development of meningitis.
the development of meningitis.
28. CSF Otorrhea Surgical
CSF Otorrhea Surgical
Management
Management
Surgical approach
Surgical approach
Status of hearing
Status of hearing
Meningocele/encephalocele
Meningocele/encephalocele
Fistula location
Fistula location
Transmastoid
Transmastoid
Middle Cranial Fossa
Middle Cranial Fossa
29. Overlay vs Underlay
Overlay vs Underlay
technique
technique
Meta-analysis
Meta-analysis
showed that both
showed that both
techniques have
techniques have
similar success rates
similar success rates
Onlay: adjacent
Onlay: adjacent
structures at risk, or if
structures at risk, or if
the underlay is not
the underlay is not
possible
possible
30. Technique of closure
Technique of closure
Muscle, fascia, fat, cartilage, etc..
Muscle, fascia, fat, cartilage, etc..
The success rate is significantly higher for
The success rate is significantly higher for
those patients who undergo primary
those patients who undergo primary
closure with a multi-layer technique versus
closure with a multi-layer technique versus
those patients who only get single-layer
those patients who only get single-layer
closure.
closure.
Refractory cases may require closure of
Refractory cases may require closure of
the EAC and obliteration.
the EAC and obliteration.
31. Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve Injuries
Loss of forehead wrinkles
Loss of forehead wrinkles
Bell’s Phenomenon
Bell’s Phenomenon
Nasal tip pointing away
Nasal tip pointing away
Flattened Nasofacial groove
Flattened Nasofacial groove
33. Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve Injuries
Initial Evaluation is the most important
Initial Evaluation is the most important
prognostic factor
prognostic factor
Previous status
Previous status
Time
Time
Onset and progression
Onset and progression
Complete vs. Incomplete
Complete vs. Incomplete
34. House Brackman Scale
House Brackman Scale
No movement
Total
VI
Assymetry at rest, barely
noticeable motion
Severe
V
Incomplete eye closure, symmetry
at rest, no forehead movement,
dysfiguring synkinesis
Moderatel
y Severe
IV
Complete eye closure, noticeable
synkinesis, slight forehead
movement
Moderate
III
Slight synkinesis/weakness
Mild
II
Normal facial function
Normal
I
35. Electrophysiologic Testing
Electrophysiologic Testing
NET: Nerve Excitability Test
NET: Nerve Excitability Test
MST: Maximal Stimulation Test
MST: Maximal Stimulation Test
ENoG: Electroneurography
ENoG: Electroneurography
Goal is to determine whether the lesion is partial
Goal is to determine whether the lesion is partial
or complete?
or complete?
Neuropraxia: Transient block of axoplasmic flow ( no
Neuropraxia: Transient block of axoplasmic flow ( no
neural atrophy/damage)
neural atrophy/damage)
Axonotmesis: damage to nerve axon with
Axonotmesis: damage to nerve axon with
preservation of the epineurium (regrowth)
preservation of the epineurium (regrowth)
Neurotmesis: Complete disruption of the nerve ( no
Neurotmesis: Complete disruption of the nerve ( no
chance of organized regrowth)
chance of organized regrowth)
36. Nerve Excitability Test
Nerve Excitability Test
Maximal Stimulation Test
Maximal Stimulation Test
Stimulating electrodes are placed and a
Stimulating electrodes are placed and a
gross movement is recorded
gross movement is recorded
Not as objective and reliable
Not as objective and reliable
>3.5mA difference suggests a poor
>3.5mA difference suggests a poor
prognosis for return of facial function.
prognosis for return of facial function.
Correlates with >90% degeneration on ENoG
Correlates with >90% degeneration on ENoG
37. Electroneuronography
Electroneuronography
Most accurate, qualitative measurement
Most accurate, qualitative measurement
Sensing electrodes are placed, a voluntary
Sensing electrodes are placed, a voluntary
response is recorded
response is recorded
Accurate after 3 days
Accurate after 3 days
Requires an intact side to compare to
Requires an intact side to compare to
Reduction of >90% amplitude correlates
Reduction of >90% amplitude correlates
with a poor prognosis for spontaneous
with a poor prognosis for spontaneous
recovery
recovery
38. Electromyography
Electromyography
Electrode is placed within the muscle and
Electrode is placed within the muscle and
voluntary movement is attempted.
voluntary movement is attempted.
Normal Muscle is electrically silent.
Normal Muscle is electrically silent.
After 10-14 days, the denervated muscle
After 10-14 days, the denervated muscle
begins to spontaneously fire:
begins to spontaneously fire:
Diphasic/Polyphasic potentials: Good
Diphasic/Polyphasic potentials: Good
Loss of voluntary potentials: Bad
Loss of voluntary potentials: Bad
40. Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve Injuries
Chang & Cass
Chang & Cass
Medline search back to 1966
Medline search back to 1966
Individually reviewed each article
Individually reviewed each article
1) Understand the pathophysiology of facial
1) Understand the pathophysiology of facial
nerve damage in temporal bone trauma.
nerve damage in temporal bone trauma.
2) What is the effect of surgical intervention
2) What is the effect of surgical intervention
on the ultimate outcome of the facial nerve.
on the ultimate outcome of the facial nerve.
3) Propose a rational course for evaluation
3) Propose a rational course for evaluation
and treatment.
and treatment.
41. Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve Injuries
Chang & Cass
Chang & Cass
Pathophysiology based on findings by Fisch and
Pathophysiology based on findings by Fisch and
Lambert and Brackmann:
Lambert and Brackmann:
Where?
Where?
Perigeniculate, Labyrinthine, and meatal segments
Perigeniculate, Labyrinthine, and meatal segments
Concern over findings of endoneural fibrosis and neural atrophy
Concern over findings of endoneural fibrosis and neural atrophy
proximal to the lesions
proximal to the lesions
In an untreated human specimen found intraneural edema and
In an untreated human specimen found intraneural edema and
demyelinization that extended proximally to the meatal foramen
demyelinization that extended proximally to the meatal foramen
How?
How?
Longitudinal Fractures
Longitudinal Fractures
• 15% transection
15% transection
• 33% bony impingement, 43% hematoma
33% bony impingement, 43% hematoma
Transverse Fractures
Transverse Fractures
• 92% transection
92% transection
42. Does Facial Nerve decompression result in
Does Facial Nerve decompression result in
superior functional outcomes compared with
superior functional outcomes compared with
no treatment?
no treatment?
Not enough human data!
Not enough human data!
Boyle-monkey: prophylactic epineural decompression in
Boyle-monkey: prophylactic epineural decompression in
complete paralysis did not improve recovery of facial
complete paralysis did not improve recovery of facial
nerve function after induced complete paralysis
nerve function after induced complete paralysis
Kartush: Prophylactic decompression of the meatal
Kartush: Prophylactic decompression of the meatal
segment during acoustic neuroma decreased the
segment during acoustic neuroma decreased the
incidence of delayed paralysis
incidence of delayed paralysis
Adour: compared patients with complete paralysis found:
Adour: compared patients with complete paralysis found:
Equal outcome with observation vs. decompression without
Equal outcome with observation vs. decompression without
nerve slitting
nerve slitting
Worse outcome with decompression with nerve slitting
Worse outcome with decompression with nerve slitting
43. Does Facial Nerve decompression result in
Does Facial Nerve decompression result in
superior functional outcomes compared with
superior functional outcomes compared with
no treatment?
no treatment?
Many difficulties in Study designs,
Many difficulties in Study designs,
controls, etc, but they made some rough
controls, etc, but they made some rough
estimates:
estimates:
50% of patients who undergo facial nerve
50% of patients who undergo facial nerve
decompression obtain excellent outcomes
decompression obtain excellent outcomes
The true efficacy of facial nerve
The true efficacy of facial nerve
decompression surgery for trauma
decompression surgery for trauma
remains uncertain
remains uncertain
44. Conservative Treatment
Conservative Treatment
Candidates
Candidates
Chang and Cass
Chang and Cass
Present with
Present with Normal Facial Function
Normal Facial Function
regardless of progression
regardless of progression
Incomplete paralysis and no
Incomplete paralysis and no
progression
progression to complete paralysis
to complete paralysis
Less than
Less than 95%
95% degeneration by ENoG
degeneration by ENoG
• Most data comes from Bell’s palsy/tumor studies
Most data comes from Bell’s palsy/tumor studies
by Fisch.
by Fisch.
45. Conservative Treatment
Conservative Treatment
Candidates
Candidates
Brodie and Thompson
Brodie and Thompson
All patients that presented with normal facial
All patients that presented with normal facial
nerve function initially that progressed to
nerve function initially that progressed to
complete paralysis
complete paralysis recovered to a
recovered to a HB
HB
1 or 2.
1 or 2.
46. Surgical Candidates
Surgical Candidates
Critical Prognostic factors
Critical Prognostic factors
Immediate
Immediate vs. Delayed
vs. Delayed
Complete
Complete vs. Incomplete paralysis
vs. Incomplete paralysis
ENoG criteria
ENoG criteria
48. Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve Injuries
Chang & Cass
Chang & Cass
What time frame is best to operate?
What time frame is best to operate?
Fisch-cats: Decompression of the nerve within
Fisch-cats: Decompression of the nerve within
a 12 day period resulted in “excellent”
a 12 day period resulted in “excellent”
functional recovery. Presumption was that it
functional recovery. Presumption was that it
preserved endoneural tubules. (limits the
preserved endoneural tubules. (limits the
damage to axonotmesis at worst)
damage to axonotmesis at worst)
Limits the accuracy of your patient selection
Limits the accuracy of your patient selection
because EMG is not reliable until day 10-14.
because EMG is not reliable until day 10-14.
49. Surgical Approach
Surgical Approach
Medial to the Geniculate Ganglion
Medial to the Geniculate Ganglion
No useful hearing
No useful hearing
• Transmastoid-translabyrinthine
Transmastoid-translabyrinthine
Intact hearing
Intact hearing
• Transmastoid-trans-epitympanic
Transmastoid-trans-epitympanic
• Middle Cranial Fossa
Middle Cranial Fossa
Lateral to Geniculate Ganglion
Lateral to Geniculate Ganglion
Transmastoid
Transmastoid
50. Surgical Approach
Surgical Approach
Chang & Cass
Chang & Cass
Histopathologic study
Histopathologic study
Severe facial nerve
Severe facial nerve
injury results in
injury results in
retrograde axonal
retrograde axonal
degeneration to the level
degeneration to the level
of the labyrinthine and
of the labyrinthine and
probably meatal
probably meatal
segments
segments
51. Surgical findings of
Surgical findings of greater than
greater than
50%
50% nerve transection/damage
nerve transection/damage
Nerve repair via primary anastamosis or
Nerve repair via primary anastamosis or
cable graft repair
cable graft repair
HB 1 or 2: 0%
HB 1 or 2: 0%
HB 3 or 4: 82%
HB 3 or 4: 82%
HB 5 or 6: 18%
HB 5 or 6: 18%
52. Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injuries
Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injuries
Mastoidectomy (55%)
Mastoidectomy (55%)
Tympanoplasty (14%)
Tympanoplasty (14%)
Bony Exostoses (14%)
Bony Exostoses (14%)
Lower tympanic segment is the most
Lower tympanic segment is the most
common location injury
common location injury
79% were not identified at the time of
79% were not identified at the time of
surgery
surgery
53. Management of Iatrogenic
Management of Iatrogenic
Facial Nerve Injuries
Facial Nerve Injuries
Green, et al.
Green, et al.
<50% damage: perform decompression
<50% damage: perform decompression
75% had HB of 3 or better!
75% had HB of 3 or better!
>50% damage: perform nerve repair
>50% damage: perform nerve repair
No patients had better than a HB 3
No patients had better than a HB 3
Beware of local anesthetics
Beware of local anesthetics
General consensus: acute, complete,
General consensus: acute, complete,
postoperative paralysis should be
postoperative paralysis should be
explored as soon as possible.
explored as soon as possible.
54. Emergencies
Emergencies
Brain Herniation
Brain Herniation
Massive Hemorrhage
Massive Hemorrhage
Pack the EAC
Pack the EAC
Carotid arteriography with embolization
Carotid arteriography with embolization
55. Bibliography
Bibliography
Bailey, Byron J., ed. Head and Neck surgery- Otolaryngology. Philadelphia, P.A. J.B. Lippincott Co., 1993.
Bailey, Byron J., ed. Head and Neck surgery- Otolaryngology. Philadelphia, P.A. J.B. Lippincott Co., 1993.
Brodie, HA, Thompson TC. Management of Complications from 820 Temporal Bone Fractures. American
Brodie, HA, Thompson TC. Management of Complications from 820 Temporal Bone Fractures. American
Journal of Otology; 18: 188-197, 1997.
Journal of Otology; 18: 188-197, 1997.
Brodie HA, Prophylactic Antibiotic for Posttraumatic CSF Fistulas. Arch of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck
Brodie HA, Prophylactic Antibiotic for Posttraumatic CSF Fistulas. Arch of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck
Surgery; 123; 749-752, 1997.
Surgery; 123; 749-752, 1997.
Black, et al. Surgical Management of Perilymphatic Fistulas: A Portland experience. American Journal of
Black, et al. Surgical Management of Perilymphatic Fistulas: A Portland experience. American Journal of
Otology; 3: 254-261, 1992.
Otology; 3: 254-261, 1992.
Chang CY, Cass SP. Management of Facial Nerve Injury Due to Temporal Bone Trauma. The American Journal
Chang CY, Cass SP. Management of Facial Nerve Injury Due to Temporal Bone Trauma. The American Journal
of Otology; 20: 96-114, 1999.
of Otology; 20: 96-114, 1999.
Coker N, Traumatic Intratemporal Facial Nerve Injuries: Management Rationale for Preservation of Function.
Coker N, Traumatic Intratemporal Facial Nerve Injuries: Management Rationale for Preservation of Function.
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; 97:262-269, 1987.
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; 97:262-269, 1987.
Green, JD. Surgical Management of Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injuries. Otolaryngolgoy- Head and Neck Surgery;
Green, JD. Surgical Management of Iatrogenic Facial Nerve Injuries. Otolaryngolgoy- Head and Neck Surgery;
111; 606-610, 1994.
111; 606-610, 1994.
Lambert PR, Brackman DE.
Lambert PR, Brackman DE. Facial Paralysis in Longitudinal Temporal Bone Fractures : A Review of 26 cases.
Facial Paralysis in Longitudinal Temporal Bone Fractures : A Review of 26 cases.
Laryngoscope; 94:1022-1026, 1984.
Laryngoscope; 94:1022-1026, 1984.
Lee D, Honrado C, Har-El G. Pediatric Temporal Bone Fractures. Laryngoscope: vol 108(6). June 1998,
Lee D, Honrado C, Har-El G. Pediatric Temporal Bone Fractures. Laryngoscope: vol 108(6). June 1998,
p816-821.
p816-821.
Mckennan KX, Chole RA. Facial Paralysis in Temporal Bone Trauma. American Journal of Otology; 13:
Mckennan KX, Chole RA. Facial Paralysis in Temporal Bone Trauma. American Journal of Otology; 13:
354-261, 1982.
354-261, 1982.
Savva A, Taylor M, Beatty C. Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks involving the Temporal Bone: Report on
Savva A, Taylor M, Beatty C. Management of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks involving the Temporal Bone: Report on
92 Patients. Laryngoscope: vol 113(1). January 2003, p50-56
92 Patients. Laryngoscope: vol 113(1). January 2003, p50-56
Thaler E, Bruney F, Kennedy D, et al. Use of an Electronic Nose to Distinguish Cerebrospinal Fluid from Serum.
Thaler E, Bruney F, Kennedy D, et al. Use of an Electronic Nose to Distinguish Cerebrospinal Fluid from Serum.
Archives of Otolaryngology; vol 126(1). Jan 2000, p71-74.
Archives of Otolaryngology; vol 126(1). Jan 2000, p71-74.