17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE) - For Educational and Information Purposes!
SPREAD THE WORD - - HELP SUPPORT THE COLLAPSE OF THE UNITED STATES' DESPOTISM TERRORIST GOVERNMENT REGIME!
OBJECTION TO 06/07/16 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE. . .(DOCKET NO. 78); TIMELY NOTIFICATION TO BANKRUPTCY COURT ADVISING 06/07/16 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE. . . – DOCKET NO. 78 – IS A NONAPPEALABLE ORDER; TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION VIOLATIONS; TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF INFRINGEMENT UPON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS; REQUEST TO BE ADVISED OF CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS; REITERATION OF MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE EDWARD ELLINGTON; AND NOTIFICATION TO THE PUBLIC AND WORLD/FOREIGN LEADERS
02/16/12 CHRONOLOGICAL CHART OF EVENTS - - Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Law Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
02/27/12 UPDATED LINKS FOR - 01/10/12 “NOTIFICATION FOR TERMINATION - REQUES...VogelDenise
02/28/12 UPDATED LINKS FOR - 01/10/12 “NOTIFICATION FOR TERMINATION - REQUEST FOR IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II – RESPONSE TO THE ATTACKS ON FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY REGARDING ALLEGED HAZING INCIDENT – REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTION MAY BE NECESSARY”
This is the document that United States President Barack Obama and White Supremacist/Jewish Zionist are trying to keep out of the PUBLIC's/WORLD's eyes.
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, HEALTH CARE BILL/LAW, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
MARTIAL LAW Is NOT An Option To The PROTESTS Of The OPPRESSED By A DESPOTISM ...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
MARTIAL LAW: UNDERSTANDING POLICE BRUTALITY
BEING USED IN THE UNITED STATES’ RACIST-GENOCIDE PRACTICES TO PROMOTE A RACE WAR/CIVIL UNREST
BUILDING THE CASE FOR THE LEGAL/LAWFUL REVOLUTIONARY OVERTHROW OF THE UNITED STATES
DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT REGIME
ARE BLACK PEOPLE GETTING JUST WHAT THEY HAVE $PAID$ FORVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This document has been prepared in regards to Vogel Denise Newsome’s take on the OVER $400 BILLION OF DOLLARS that Blacks/African-Americans give to Churches/Religious Organizations WHILE their COMMUNITIES DECAY and the JEWS/ZIONISTS and WHITE SUPREMACISTS engage in GENOCIDE PRACTICES against Blacks/African-Americans (i.e. specifically Males).
071416 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION - FACEBOOK LOCKOUTVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
GOT LOCKED OUT OF FACEBOOK FOR SHARING INFORMATION REGARDING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE 911 WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBINGS and WHY MARTIAL LAW is NOT APPLICABLE in the PROTESTS BEING CARRIED OUT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REGARDING POLICE BRUTALITY. . .
HOW LONG DID UNITED STATES PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, HIS LAWYERS BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ and their JEWISH/ZIONIST COUNTERPARTS THINK THEIR LIES WERE GOING TO HOLD UP!
2016 ANNUAL UPDATE REPORT FROM COMMUNITY ACTIVIST VOGEL DENISE NEWSOMEVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
It is being reported that MORE. . .MORE. . .and MORE People who have gotten caught up in the DISTRACTIONS of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime’s MOCKING of the 2016 Election Process, that Citizens are WANTING OTHER OPTIONS to the Democrat’s Candidate (Hillary Clinton) and the Republican’s Candidate (Donald Trump)!
GOOD NEWS! Just as the American Revolution was FOUGHT for FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE from Great Britain’s OPPRESSIVE DESPOTISM Government Regime, REVOLUTIONARY ACTION is AVAILABLE to Citizens of the United States OF AMERICA that have had ENOUGH to the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime!
GET OFF OF THE SIDELINES and TAKE ACTION! QUIT COMPLAINING and PROVIDE SOLUTIONS!
02/16/12 CHRONOLOGICAL CHART OF EVENTS - - Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Law Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
02/27/12 UPDATED LINKS FOR - 01/10/12 “NOTIFICATION FOR TERMINATION - REQUES...VogelDenise
02/28/12 UPDATED LINKS FOR - 01/10/12 “NOTIFICATION FOR TERMINATION - REQUEST FOR IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II – RESPONSE TO THE ATTACKS ON FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY REGARDING ALLEGED HAZING INCIDENT – REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTION MAY BE NECESSARY”
This is the document that United States President Barack Obama and White Supremacist/Jewish Zionist are trying to keep out of the PUBLIC's/WORLD's eyes.
Provides information as to the REASONS why the FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS and CONGRESSIONAL COMPLAINTS Filed by Vogel Denise Newsome are being OBSTRUCTED from being PROSECUTED!
Garretson Resolution Group appears to be FRONTING Firm for United States President Barack Obama and Legal Counsel/Advisor (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) which has submitted a SLAPP Complaint to OneWebHosting.com in efforts of PREVENTING the PUBLIC/WORLD from knowing of its and President Barack Obama's ROLE in CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome in EXPOSING the TRUTH behind the 911 DOMESTIC TERRORIST ATTACKS, HEALTH CARE BILL/LAW, COLLAPSE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY, EMPLOYMENT violations and other crimes of United States Government Officials. Information that United States President Barack Obama, The Garretson Resolution Group, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, and United States Congress, etc. do NOT want the PUBLIC/WORLD to see. Information of PUBLIC Interest!
MARTIAL LAW Is NOT An Option To The PROTESTS Of The OPPRESSED By A DESPOTISM ...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
MARTIAL LAW: UNDERSTANDING POLICE BRUTALITY
BEING USED IN THE UNITED STATES’ RACIST-GENOCIDE PRACTICES TO PROMOTE A RACE WAR/CIVIL UNREST
BUILDING THE CASE FOR THE LEGAL/LAWFUL REVOLUTIONARY OVERTHROW OF THE UNITED STATES
DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT REGIME
ARE BLACK PEOPLE GETTING JUST WHAT THEY HAVE $PAID$ FORVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This document has been prepared in regards to Vogel Denise Newsome’s take on the OVER $400 BILLION OF DOLLARS that Blacks/African-Americans give to Churches/Religious Organizations WHILE their COMMUNITIES DECAY and the JEWS/ZIONISTS and WHITE SUPREMACISTS engage in GENOCIDE PRACTICES against Blacks/African-Americans (i.e. specifically Males).
071416 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION - FACEBOOK LOCKOUTVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
GOT LOCKED OUT OF FACEBOOK FOR SHARING INFORMATION REGARDING THE TRUTH ABOUT THE 911 WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBINGS and WHY MARTIAL LAW is NOT APPLICABLE in the PROTESTS BEING CARRIED OUT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REGARDING POLICE BRUTALITY. . .
HOW LONG DID UNITED STATES PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, HIS LAWYERS BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ and their JEWISH/ZIONIST COUNTERPARTS THINK THEIR LIES WERE GOING TO HOLD UP!
2016 ANNUAL UPDATE REPORT FROM COMMUNITY ACTIVIST VOGEL DENISE NEWSOMEVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
It is being reported that MORE. . .MORE. . .and MORE People who have gotten caught up in the DISTRACTIONS of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime’s MOCKING of the 2016 Election Process, that Citizens are WANTING OTHER OPTIONS to the Democrat’s Candidate (Hillary Clinton) and the Republican’s Candidate (Donald Trump)!
GOOD NEWS! Just as the American Revolution was FOUGHT for FREEDOM and INDEPENDENCE from Great Britain’s OPPRESSIVE DESPOTISM Government Regime, REVOLUTIONARY ACTION is AVAILABLE to Citizens of the United States OF AMERICA that have had ENOUGH to the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime!
GET OFF OF THE SIDELINES and TAKE ACTION! QUIT COMPLAINING and PROVIDE SOLUTIONS!
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - IghoVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
ihe ngwọta maka udo n'ụwa!
Ewere ACTION na ime OGOLOGO oge igabiga CHANGE!
Dị ka ndị ọzọ na ndị ọzọ ndị mmadụ na-aza elu na-amalite na-ewere nguzo MEGIDE ihe ọjọọ na ajọ Forces nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu na ya West / European jikọrọ aka, ikpe maka CONSPIRACIES na-eyi ọha egwu Ọrụ akwali Racism of Nazi na / ma ọ bụ ya White Jewish-Zionist-Supremacist Members bụ oGOLOGO oge igabiga!
Ọ dịghị mgbaghara maka CONSPIRACIES nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu na-ekere òkè Nzuzu Igbu na mgbukpọ omume nke Innocent ikom, ndị inyom na ụmụaka! The AJỤJỤ ịjụ bụ, "Olee otú a Nazi ụmụ na ha White Juu / Zionists / Supremacists ogbo ekwe ka Ike ụgha na ibibi Beautiful Nations-Of-Agba na agbanahụ ntaramahụhụ!"
Community mmume Vogel Denise Newsome bụ inye agba Akaebe dị ka akwụkwọ a - ENGLISH Version:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
na-akwado "ihe" United States 'DESPOTISM-eyi ọha egwu Government ọchịchị si / Organization Nazi Umu na / ma ọ bụ acha ọcha Juu / Zionists / Supremacists MAARA na MGBE ha maara ma / ma ọ bụ kwesịrị ịma nke mpụ ha; Otú ọ dị, Obi ekpebi ndị ọzọ ụzọ, bụ ndị n'elu Iwu, na-anọgide na na-ebibi ihe na ha ọchịchọ "Malite Agha Ụwa nke Atọ!"
Ọ bụ TIME maka Nations-Of-Agba na People-Of-Agba na-eteta na-akwụsị ndị ọcha Ọchịchọ ime ka agbụrụ ka agbụrụ nile agbụrụ ọzọ!
NO ọzọ agha, ọ bụ oge kpee ikpe ndị ọcha eyi ọha egwu nzukọ Ndị na-arụ ọrụ ruo n'okpuru guise nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu!
Biko chere free inye na Nkwado ọrụ a na-eziokwu eweta CHANGE, udo ma na-ekpughepụ eziokwu na:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome ma ọ bụ
Nzuzo ma ọ bụ na-amaghị aha onyinye: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Na udo na ịhụnanya,
Community mmume Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
Ekwentị: (513) 680-2922
101017 NEWSOME REQUEST STATUS OF EEOC INVESTIGATION (First Heritage Credit)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
REQUEST FOR STATUS OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION INVESTIGATION – EEOC CHARGE NO. 423-2015-00802 - - Vogel Denise Newsome vs. First Heritage Credit LLC
This EEOC Charge is a matter of PUBLIC Record and one of HIGH-PROFILE Status as it is also a document that is of HISTORICAL value and will be used in bringing about the “TOTAL COLLAPSE” of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and that is CONTROLLED and RUN by Nazis/WHITE Jews-Zionists-Supremacist.
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome was asked to submit a “WRITTEN” Request for the STATUS of the INVESTIGATION!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100417-newsomes-phone-conversations-with-eeoc-fhc-matter
EVIDENCE (such as this document) which LEGALLY and LAWFULLY allows for Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome to DIRECTLY seek “INTERNATIONAL” Assistance in the OVERTHROW of the World’s NO. 1 “DESPOTISM” Government Regime/Organization that is Controlled/Run by Nazi/WHITE Jews-Zionist-Supremacists who engage in CONSPIRACIES that are Terrorist and Racist Oriented!
FAILURE TO ACT and FAILURE TO SURRENDER by the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime/Organization HAVE RESULTED in MORE Conspiracies involving “Domestic” and “INTERNATIONAL” Terrorist/Racist Attacks that has ultimately LED to its OWN DEMISE! LOL!
DONATE TO SUPPORT AT: https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
With PEACE and LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - JavaneseVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
THE SOLUSI FOR jagad tentrem!
Njupuk tindakan lan nggawa GANTI LONG kasep!
Minangka liyane lan liyane wong sing tangi lan diwiwiti kanggo njupuk ngadeg marang evils lan duraka Pasukan saka Despotism Amerika Serikat 'Government Regime / Organisasi / Kakaisaran lan sawijining West / Sekutu Eropah, tuntutan ukum kanggo konspirasi-konspirasi lan teroris Para Rasul motivasi dening rasisme saka Nazi lan / utawa Anggota Putih Yahudi-Zionis-Supremacist iku LONG kasep!
Ana ora ana alesan kanggo konspirasi-konspirasi saka Despotism Amerika Serikat 'Government Regime / Organisasi / Kakaisaran awake dhewe melu ing pati bodho lan laku pembantaian wong resik, lan anak wadon! Ing pitakon kanggo takon, "CARA padha iki katurunan Nazi lan sing mitra Putih Yahudi / Zionists / Supremacists diijini nggawe dumunung lan numpes Beautiful Nations-Of-werna lan nampani paukuman!"
Aktivis Community Vogel Denise Newsome punika nyediakake bukti kayata document iki - ENGLISH Version:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
kanggo ndhukung "Apa" Despotism teroris Regime Pemerintah Amerika Serikat 'kang Organization / Nazi Katurunan lan / utawa Yahudi PUTIH / Zionists / Supremacists ngerti lan nalika padha sumurup lan / utawa ngirim wis dikenal saka Kadurjanan; Nanging, durung lila arep katon cara liyane, nyeleh piyambak ndhuwur sabdhoning, lan terus ing Course cilaka sing nggoleki kanggo "Mulai WORLD WAR III!"
Iku TIME kanggo Nations-Of-werna lan wong-kang-werna kanggo tangi lan sijine END kanggo nggoleki PUTIH Man kang kanggo nggawe lomba kang Superior liwat ALL Races liyane!
Ora ana liyane WARS, iku TIME kanggo nuntut Anggota Organisasi Teroris putih Man kang sing operasi munggah ing guise Despotism Amerika Serikat 'Government Regime / Organisasi / Kakaisaran!
Mangga aran gratis kanggo nyumbang lan karya SUPPORT sing bener nggawa GANTI, tentrem lan nyedhiyakake bebener ing:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome utawa
Sumbangan rahasia utawa Anonymous: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Kanthi tentrem lan LOVE,
Aktivis Community Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 04/09/13US SUPREME COURT LETTER (PKH) - For TranslationsVogelDenise
We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for translations.
01/10/12 - President Barack Obama - NOTIFICATION OF TERMINATION. . .VogelDenise
This document with UPDATED LINKS since it appears the Obama Administration had Scribd.com CLOSE ACCOUNT may be viewed at:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/022712-updated-links-for-obama-eviction-notice-011012final
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and his CONSPIRATORS/LAWYERS (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) have seen to it that Our Scribd.com Account was DISABLED. Will provide this document to you at another location with UPDATED LINKS!
NOTIFICATION FOR TERMINATION - REQUEST FOR IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II – RESPONSE TO THE ATTACKS ON FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY REGARDING ALLEGED HAZING INCIDENT – REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTION MAY BE NECESSARY
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
We look forward to continuing to work LEGALLY and LAWFULLY with the “FEW” and “CHOSEN” – Matthew 22:14 – who have NOT turned their backs and BETRAYED People-Of-Color to the WHITE Man!
Our CHILDREN deserve more and people who have NOT given up on them and BETRAYED them to the WHITE Man!
The WHITE Man came and STOLE the Lands/Territories and LIED about the HISTORY of the United States of America claiming to have DISCOVERED what is now known as “United States of America” WHEN these Lands/Territories were ALREADY being OCCUPIED and INHABITED by the Native People living here. Lands/Territories that are “NOW” MANDATORILY required to be RETURNED to these Native People and their DESCENDANTS! However, keep in mind that the WHITE Man is NOT going to do this PEACEFULLY!
WATCH and REJOICE with us in the CELEBRATION of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime’s COLLAPSE/FALL!
Please feel free to DONATE to SUPPORT The WORK:
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
INTERNATIONAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
11/11/19 International Criminal Court-Notice of Amicus Curiae Written Submiss...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Notice That The Utica International Embassy’s Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome Will Provide Amicus Curiae Written Submission For The Appeals Hearing Of 4-6 December
Request For Protective Witness Services – VICTIMS and WITNESS UNIT
Notice To Request United Nations Police Services…
Update On The Formal Criminal Charges Regarding the Situation In The United States of America
Request For REPARATION, RESTITUTION and SETTING UP Of TRUST FUND(S)
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
BARACK OBAMA - READ MY LIPS - ObamaFraudGateVogelDenise
So in a country as the United States of America, HOW are TWO Families (CLINTON and BUSH) and their Lawyers/Attorneys (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) ALLOWED to STAY in POWER, HIJACK a Government and TERRORIZE Nations (Domestic and Foreign) and hold Citizens HOSTAGE to such TERRORIST Acts? With their COUSIN (Barack Obama) in the White House – NOW is the time to OVERTHROW such Terrorist Regimes: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/english-040512
YES, the United States of America vs. CHINA Conflict is ALL a part of the GAME organized by the United States of America’s CORRUPT Government Officials and CHINA’s Leaders – i.e. as shown in this document the DECEPTION of the Democrat vs. Republican SCAM organized by Baker Donelson and their CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS!
Hopefully, this document will serve as a REMINDER of WHY “MONOPOLIES” are FORBIDDEN and ILLEGAL! HOW the United States of America attempted to MONOPOLIZE the INTERNATIONAL Governments and FINANCIAL Institutions which has led to the ECONOMIC and FINANCIAL Collapse!
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - LatinVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
solutio Pax mundi!
Tempus agendae rei et scaena productionis et dum indulgendo inveterascere auk mutat Ue
Ut magis ac magis populus es e somno expergiscitur et cum cœpisset stabis contra mala et male vires Civitatibus Foederatis Americae dominationis satellitem Government Regime / Unitarum / Imperii et eius Occidentalis / Europae adfuturos, quaestio de insidiis et terroristis actus moventur Alienarum stirpium discrimen est NAZI et / aut inter Hebraeos et ad Alba Zionist diu overdue, supremacist Sodales!
Est enim inexcusabiles ex insidiis Civitatibus Foederatis Americae, Regime Government REGNUM / Unitarum / Imperii excusandas excusationes in peccatis, et DELIRUS Caedes GENOCIDE exercitia innocentum, et parvulos Quaerere quaestio est 'quomodo isti sunt semen Nazi Iudaeorum et Alba / Zionists / Supremacists counterparts liceat creare sit, pulcra Nationes De Colo colui cultum, numquid effugiet? "
Community Activist Vogel Dionisia Newsome est providing TESTIMONIO ut hoc documento - Anglica:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
sustinere, "quid" Civitatibus Foederatis Americae dominationis satellitem CT Regime Government scriptor / s Unitarum NAZI Descendants et / vel alba Iudaeis / Zionists / Supremacists cognoscendum habetur accessus et cum scirem et / vel eorum SUBMERSERINT notum sit tibi, tamen libenter iudicat videri aliter se supra leges et proficiscere in investigatione perniciosoque "infer bellum tertium"
Tempus est ad Nationes-Of-Of-coloris istius Colo colui cultum excitare populus, et non simus ultra in hominis quest facere O genus alia gente in superior!
Nulla amplia bella essent, non continue fuerit prosecutus TEMPUS Alba homo est scriptor terroristis ordo membrorum est operating sub Civitatibus Foederatis Americae, Regime Government REGNUM / Unitarum / Imperii!
Char qui et fulcite opus est forma placet liberum augens actu CHANCE, pax et veritas in exponit:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome aut
CLANCULARIUS ARCANUS aut DONATIONS: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Cum dicta pacis vísio,
Community Activist Vogel Dionisia Newsome
Post Office (XXXI)CCLXV Box
Jackson in Mississippi (XXXIX)CCLXXXVI
PHONE (DXIII) 680-2922
013016 - DID YOU KNOW THIS ABOUT COMMUNITY ACTIVIST VOGEL DENISE NEWSOMEVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
CAN YOU IMAGINE
HOW MUCH QUICKER and SWIFTER
THE GOVERNMENT TRANSITION WOULD BE
IF GOD’S CHOSEN NATION OF PEOPLE
WOULD UNITE AND ASSIST IN THE
BUILDING OF THE GOVERNMENT LEFT FOR US?
GOD HAS ALREADY STRATEGICALLY
PLACED HIS CHOSEN NATION
IN THE GOVERNMENT JOBS
(Federal, State, City and Local)
FOR THE TRANSITION OF POWER!
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - HausaVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
da mafita ga zaman lafiya a duniya!
Daukar mataki da kuma kawo dogon m CHANGE!
Kamar yadda kuma da mutane suna tashi mai gidan da farko ka dage AGAINST Mũnãnan ayyuka da Miyagun Forces of Amurka 'DESPOTISM gwamnatin gwamnatin / Organization / Empire da kuma ta Yamma / Turai masõya, la'anta ga ganawarsu da kuma ayyukan ta'addanci m da Wariyar launin fata na Nazi da kuma / ko ta White Yahudawa-Zionist-Supremacist Members masu dogon m!
Babu wani uzuri ga Makircin Amurka 'DESPOTISM gwamnatin gwamnatin / Organization / Empire nishadantarwa a m kisan kai da kuma aiwatar da kisan gillar da ayyuka na Innocent maza, mata da yara! A tambaya shi ne, "YADDA sun wadannan Nazi zũriyarsu, da 'White Yahudawa / yahudawan sahyoniya / Supremacists takwarorinsu yarda don ƙirƙirar arairayi da kuma Lalata Beautiful Duniya-Of-Color, kuma ka kuɓuta!"
Community fafutukar Vogel Denise Newsome ne samar da SHAIDA kamar wannan daftarin aiki - Mai Tsarki:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
don tallafa "ABIN" Amurka 'DESPOTISM' yan ta'adda gwamnatin gwamnatin ta / Organization ta Nazi Jĩkõki, da / ko WHITE Yahudawa / yahudawan sahyoniya / Supremacists SAN Kuma a lõkacin da suka san da / ko ya kamata ya san mãsu laifi daga zunubansu. Duk da haka, bai son ransa shirya zuwa DUBI da sauran hanyar da, sanya kansu sama da Laws, da kuma ci gaba a kan hallakaswa Course a su nema wa "Fara yakin duniya III!"
Shi ne TIME for Duniya-Of-Color da Mutane da-na-Color farka da kuma sa wani KARSHEN ga WHITE Man ta nema a yi masa tseren isa, a kan DUK sauran Races!
NO mafi WARS, shi ne lokacin da za a gurfanar da fadar White Man ta kungiyar 'yan ta'adda Members cewa suna aiki up karkashin sunan Amurka' DESPOTISM gwamnatin gwamnatin / Organization / Empire!
Don Allah ji free don ba da sadaka da kuma TAIMAKO aiki da shi ne ainihin kawo CHANGE, da zaman lafiya da fallashi na GASKIYA a:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome ko
Confidential ko m gudunmawa: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Tare da zaman lafiya da soyayya,
Community fafutukar Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
WAYAR: (513) 680-2922
032917 The United States FALL - Building A GovernmentVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
“The UNITED STATES’ FALL: BUILDING A GOVERNMENT ON THE SHOULDERS OF GREAT LEADERS” is an Article to provide a SYNOPSIS on a VERY HISTORICAL UNDERTAKING – i.e. the BUILDING of a NEW Government that will serve Blacks/African-Americans/Negroes/People-Of-Color presently residing on United States of America Soil; however, WITHOUT a Government of their own. We WILL be using SOME of the SAME processes that led to the United States building its DESPOT; however, the NEW Government WILL NOT be a DESPOT and WILL BE a Government RUN and CONTROLLED by Blacks/African-Americans/Negroes/People-Of-Color and NOT a SMALL Group as the WHITE Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists in CONTROL of the United States’ DESPOT that has its HEADQUARTERS in Washington, D.C.
The Declaration of Independence was EXECUTED on July 4, 1776. We are in the PROCESS of Drafting up
11 YEARS LATER the United States’ Constitution was Created on September 17, 1787.
50 YEARS LATER was when the OLDEST Historically Black College and University (HBCU) - Cheyney University of Pennsylvania was founded in 1837.
26 YEARS LATER the Emancipation Proclamation (Freeing Slaves) was Executed on January 1, 1863.
7 YEARS LATER the First Ku Klux Klan Act was Executed on February 21, 1870. The SECOND was Executed on April 20, 1871 – approximately TWO (2) Months AFTER the forming of the Ku Klux Klan’s Corporate Headquarters in the District of Columbia.
1 YEAR LATER the United States’ Corporation Headquarters in Washington, D.C. is established on February 21, 1871.
7 YEARS LATER the Ku Klux Klan’s Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz was ESTABLISHED in 1888.
Website: www.vogeldenisenewsome.net or www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
SlideShare: www.SlideShare.net/VogelDenise
Issuu: www.issuu.com/VogelDenise
Financially Donate To Support The Work At: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC)-BosnianVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Rješenje za mir u svijetu!
PREUZIMANJE AKCIJA i dovođenje odavno PROMJENE!
Kako sve više i više ljudi se bude i počinju da zauzme stav PROTIV zla i Wicked snaga Sjedinjenih Američkih Država despotizam vlada režim / Organizacija / carstvo i njegove West / evropskih saveznika, tužilaštva za zavere i terorističkih akata motivisan rasizam NAZI i / ili Beloj jevrejsko-cionista-rasista Članovi su odavno!
Nema opravdanja za zavera Sjedinjenih Američkih Država "despotizam vlada režim / Organizacija / Empire bave besmislenim ubistva i genocid prakse nevinih muškaraca, žena i djece! Postavlja se pitanje koje se postavlja je: "Kako su ti nacistički potomaka i njihove White Jevreja / cionisti / rasisti PARTNERI dozvoljeno da se stvori LAŽI i uništiti Prekrasna nacija-of-Color i prođu nekažnjeno!"
Aktivista zajednica Vogel Denise Newsome je pružanja dokaza kao što je ovaj dokument - engleska verzija:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
da podrži "ŠTA" NAZI Potomci Sjedinjenih Američkih Država "despotizam TERORISTA Vlade režima / organizacije i / ili bijela Jevreji / cionisti / rasisti znaju i kada su znali i / ili je trebalo da zna svoje zločine; Međutim, da li svojevoljno odlučili da gledaju na drugu stranu, postavite sebe iznad zakona, i nastaviti RAZARANJEM predmeta u njihovoj potrazi za "Start SVJETSKOG RATA III!"
To je vrijeme da nacija-of-Color i People-of-boji se probuditi i stati na kraj belog čoveka QUEST da svoje rase Superior odnosu na sve druge trke!
Nema više rata, da je vrijeme da procesuira terorističke organizacije Članovi belog čoveka koji rade se pod maskom Sjedinjenih Američkih Država despotizam vlada režim / Organizacija / carstva!
Uz mir i ljubav,
Aktivista zajednica Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
TELEFON: (513) 680-2922
122018-USDOJ & ICC (Mississippi Under Terrorist Attacks)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
URGENT NOTIFICATION: THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY ARE PRESENTLY UNDER TERRORIST ATTACKS!
As of 12/20/18, this document may also be viewed at the following LINKS:
FilesAnywhere: https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c69678d5f647178b0
UIE Website: http://uticainternationalembassy.website/index.php/pages/12-20-18-state-of-ms-uie-under-terrorist-attacks
The United States of America and its Confederate States of America have LAUNCHED “ALL OUT” Terrorist Attacks and have sent their Nazis and/or Confederates, Ku Klux Klan and WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists out on the Interstates/Highways/Roads/Streets, etc. DISGUISED in Law Enforcement Uniforms to TERRORIZE, THREATEN, HARRASS, INTIMIDATE, KIDNAP, KILL/MURDER, etc. specifically TARGETING Natives, Native Americans and those who have been LABELED as Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color – i.e. with MAJOR focus on TARGETING the Utica International Embassy’s Government Officials and Citizens/Supporters of this Legally/Lawfully formed “NEW” Government!
PLEASE BE ADVISED that such UNLAWFUL Roadblocks are PROHIBITED under the United States of America’s FEDERAL Laws and that the STATES (as Mississippi) are under the JURISDICTION of the USA. In 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States of America (In USA vs. Herbert Guest) found such ROADBLOCKS to be in VIOLATION of Sovereign Citizens’ Rights and Privileges, etc. The Harold Guest Lawsuit being brought by the USA! A copy of the Supreme Court’s Decision may be found at the following LINK:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-vs-herbert-guest-highlighted
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - IghoVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
ihe ngwọta maka udo n'ụwa!
Ewere ACTION na ime OGOLOGO oge igabiga CHANGE!
Dị ka ndị ọzọ na ndị ọzọ ndị mmadụ na-aza elu na-amalite na-ewere nguzo MEGIDE ihe ọjọọ na ajọ Forces nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu na ya West / European jikọrọ aka, ikpe maka CONSPIRACIES na-eyi ọha egwu Ọrụ akwali Racism of Nazi na / ma ọ bụ ya White Jewish-Zionist-Supremacist Members bụ oGOLOGO oge igabiga!
Ọ dịghị mgbaghara maka CONSPIRACIES nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu na-ekere òkè Nzuzu Igbu na mgbukpọ omume nke Innocent ikom, ndị inyom na ụmụaka! The AJỤJỤ ịjụ bụ, "Olee otú a Nazi ụmụ na ha White Juu / Zionists / Supremacists ogbo ekwe ka Ike ụgha na ibibi Beautiful Nations-Of-Agba na agbanahụ ntaramahụhụ!"
Community mmume Vogel Denise Newsome bụ inye agba Akaebe dị ka akwụkwọ a - ENGLISH Version:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
na-akwado "ihe" United States 'DESPOTISM-eyi ọha egwu Government ọchịchị si / Organization Nazi Umu na / ma ọ bụ acha ọcha Juu / Zionists / Supremacists MAARA na MGBE ha maara ma / ma ọ bụ kwesịrị ịma nke mpụ ha; Otú ọ dị, Obi ekpebi ndị ọzọ ụzọ, bụ ndị n'elu Iwu, na-anọgide na na-ebibi ihe na ha ọchịchọ "Malite Agha Ụwa nke Atọ!"
Ọ bụ TIME maka Nations-Of-Agba na People-Of-Agba na-eteta na-akwụsị ndị ọcha Ọchịchọ ime ka agbụrụ ka agbụrụ nile agbụrụ ọzọ!
NO ọzọ agha, ọ bụ oge kpee ikpe ndị ọcha eyi ọha egwu nzukọ Ndị na-arụ ọrụ ruo n'okpuru guise nke United States 'DESPOTISM Government ọchịchị / Organization / Alaeze Ukwu!
Biko chere free inye na Nkwado ọrụ a na-eziokwu eweta CHANGE, udo ma na-ekpughepụ eziokwu na:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome ma ọ bụ
Nzuzo ma ọ bụ na-amaghị aha onyinye: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Na udo na ịhụnanya,
Community mmume Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
Ekwentị: (513) 680-2922
101017 NEWSOME REQUEST STATUS OF EEOC INVESTIGATION (First Heritage Credit)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
REQUEST FOR STATUS OF EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION INVESTIGATION – EEOC CHARGE NO. 423-2015-00802 - - Vogel Denise Newsome vs. First Heritage Credit LLC
This EEOC Charge is a matter of PUBLIC Record and one of HIGH-PROFILE Status as it is also a document that is of HISTORICAL value and will be used in bringing about the “TOTAL COLLAPSE” of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and that is CONTROLLED and RUN by Nazis/WHITE Jews-Zionists-Supremacist.
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome was asked to submit a “WRITTEN” Request for the STATUS of the INVESTIGATION!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/100417-newsomes-phone-conversations-with-eeoc-fhc-matter
EVIDENCE (such as this document) which LEGALLY and LAWFULLY allows for Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome to DIRECTLY seek “INTERNATIONAL” Assistance in the OVERTHROW of the World’s NO. 1 “DESPOTISM” Government Regime/Organization that is Controlled/Run by Nazi/WHITE Jews-Zionist-Supremacists who engage in CONSPIRACIES that are Terrorist and Racist Oriented!
FAILURE TO ACT and FAILURE TO SURRENDER by the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime/Organization HAVE RESULTED in MORE Conspiracies involving “Domestic” and “INTERNATIONAL” Terrorist/Racist Attacks that has ultimately LED to its OWN DEMISE! LOL!
DONATE TO SUPPORT AT: https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
With PEACE and LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - JavaneseVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
THE SOLUSI FOR jagad tentrem!
Njupuk tindakan lan nggawa GANTI LONG kasep!
Minangka liyane lan liyane wong sing tangi lan diwiwiti kanggo njupuk ngadeg marang evils lan duraka Pasukan saka Despotism Amerika Serikat 'Government Regime / Organisasi / Kakaisaran lan sawijining West / Sekutu Eropah, tuntutan ukum kanggo konspirasi-konspirasi lan teroris Para Rasul motivasi dening rasisme saka Nazi lan / utawa Anggota Putih Yahudi-Zionis-Supremacist iku LONG kasep!
Ana ora ana alesan kanggo konspirasi-konspirasi saka Despotism Amerika Serikat 'Government Regime / Organisasi / Kakaisaran awake dhewe melu ing pati bodho lan laku pembantaian wong resik, lan anak wadon! Ing pitakon kanggo takon, "CARA padha iki katurunan Nazi lan sing mitra Putih Yahudi / Zionists / Supremacists diijini nggawe dumunung lan numpes Beautiful Nations-Of-werna lan nampani paukuman!"
Aktivis Community Vogel Denise Newsome punika nyediakake bukti kayata document iki - ENGLISH Version:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
kanggo ndhukung "Apa" Despotism teroris Regime Pemerintah Amerika Serikat 'kang Organization / Nazi Katurunan lan / utawa Yahudi PUTIH / Zionists / Supremacists ngerti lan nalika padha sumurup lan / utawa ngirim wis dikenal saka Kadurjanan; Nanging, durung lila arep katon cara liyane, nyeleh piyambak ndhuwur sabdhoning, lan terus ing Course cilaka sing nggoleki kanggo "Mulai WORLD WAR III!"
Iku TIME kanggo Nations-Of-werna lan wong-kang-werna kanggo tangi lan sijine END kanggo nggoleki PUTIH Man kang kanggo nggawe lomba kang Superior liwat ALL Races liyane!
Ora ana liyane WARS, iku TIME kanggo nuntut Anggota Organisasi Teroris putih Man kang sing operasi munggah ing guise Despotism Amerika Serikat 'Government Regime / Organisasi / Kakaisaran!
Mangga aran gratis kanggo nyumbang lan karya SUPPORT sing bener nggawa GANTI, tentrem lan nyedhiyakake bebener ing:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome utawa
Sumbangan rahasia utawa Anonymous: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Kanthi tentrem lan LOVE,
Aktivis Community Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 04/09/13US SUPREME COURT LETTER (PKH) - For TranslationsVogelDenise
We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for translations.
01/10/12 - President Barack Obama - NOTIFICATION OF TERMINATION. . .VogelDenise
This document with UPDATED LINKS since it appears the Obama Administration had Scribd.com CLOSE ACCOUNT may be viewed at:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/022712-updated-links-for-obama-eviction-notice-011012final
PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and his CONSPIRATORS/LAWYERS (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) have seen to it that Our Scribd.com Account was DISABLED. Will provide this document to you at another location with UPDATED LINKS!
NOTIFICATION FOR TERMINATION - REQUEST FOR IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II – RESPONSE TO THE ATTACKS ON FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY REGARDING ALLEGED HAZING INCIDENT – REQUEST FOR INTERNATIONAL MILITARY INTERVENTION MAY BE NECESSARY
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
We look forward to continuing to work LEGALLY and LAWFULLY with the “FEW” and “CHOSEN” – Matthew 22:14 – who have NOT turned their backs and BETRAYED People-Of-Color to the WHITE Man!
Our CHILDREN deserve more and people who have NOT given up on them and BETRAYED them to the WHITE Man!
The WHITE Man came and STOLE the Lands/Territories and LIED about the HISTORY of the United States of America claiming to have DISCOVERED what is now known as “United States of America” WHEN these Lands/Territories were ALREADY being OCCUPIED and INHABITED by the Native People living here. Lands/Territories that are “NOW” MANDATORILY required to be RETURNED to these Native People and their DESCENDANTS! However, keep in mind that the WHITE Man is NOT going to do this PEACEFULLY!
WATCH and REJOICE with us in the CELEBRATION of the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime’s COLLAPSE/FALL!
Please feel free to DONATE to SUPPORT The WORK:
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
INTERNATIONAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
11/11/19 International Criminal Court-Notice of Amicus Curiae Written Submiss...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Notice That The Utica International Embassy’s Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome Will Provide Amicus Curiae Written Submission For The Appeals Hearing Of 4-6 December
Request For Protective Witness Services – VICTIMS and WITNESS UNIT
Notice To Request United Nations Police Services…
Update On The Formal Criminal Charges Regarding the Situation In The United States of America
Request For REPARATION, RESTITUTION and SETTING UP Of TRUST FUND(S)
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
BARACK OBAMA - READ MY LIPS - ObamaFraudGateVogelDenise
So in a country as the United States of America, HOW are TWO Families (CLINTON and BUSH) and their Lawyers/Attorneys (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) ALLOWED to STAY in POWER, HIJACK a Government and TERRORIZE Nations (Domestic and Foreign) and hold Citizens HOSTAGE to such TERRORIST Acts? With their COUSIN (Barack Obama) in the White House – NOW is the time to OVERTHROW such Terrorist Regimes: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/english-040512
YES, the United States of America vs. CHINA Conflict is ALL a part of the GAME organized by the United States of America’s CORRUPT Government Officials and CHINA’s Leaders – i.e. as shown in this document the DECEPTION of the Democrat vs. Republican SCAM organized by Baker Donelson and their CONSPIRATORS/CO-CONSPIRATORS!
Hopefully, this document will serve as a REMINDER of WHY “MONOPOLIES” are FORBIDDEN and ILLEGAL! HOW the United States of America attempted to MONOPOLIZE the INTERNATIONAL Governments and FINANCIAL Institutions which has led to the ECONOMIC and FINANCIAL Collapse!
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - LatinVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
solutio Pax mundi!
Tempus agendae rei et scaena productionis et dum indulgendo inveterascere auk mutat Ue
Ut magis ac magis populus es e somno expergiscitur et cum cœpisset stabis contra mala et male vires Civitatibus Foederatis Americae dominationis satellitem Government Regime / Unitarum / Imperii et eius Occidentalis / Europae adfuturos, quaestio de insidiis et terroristis actus moventur Alienarum stirpium discrimen est NAZI et / aut inter Hebraeos et ad Alba Zionist diu overdue, supremacist Sodales!
Est enim inexcusabiles ex insidiis Civitatibus Foederatis Americae, Regime Government REGNUM / Unitarum / Imperii excusandas excusationes in peccatis, et DELIRUS Caedes GENOCIDE exercitia innocentum, et parvulos Quaerere quaestio est 'quomodo isti sunt semen Nazi Iudaeorum et Alba / Zionists / Supremacists counterparts liceat creare sit, pulcra Nationes De Colo colui cultum, numquid effugiet? "
Community Activist Vogel Dionisia Newsome est providing TESTIMONIO ut hoc documento - Anglica:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
sustinere, "quid" Civitatibus Foederatis Americae dominationis satellitem CT Regime Government scriptor / s Unitarum NAZI Descendants et / vel alba Iudaeis / Zionists / Supremacists cognoscendum habetur accessus et cum scirem et / vel eorum SUBMERSERINT notum sit tibi, tamen libenter iudicat videri aliter se supra leges et proficiscere in investigatione perniciosoque "infer bellum tertium"
Tempus est ad Nationes-Of-Of-coloris istius Colo colui cultum excitare populus, et non simus ultra in hominis quest facere O genus alia gente in superior!
Nulla amplia bella essent, non continue fuerit prosecutus TEMPUS Alba homo est scriptor terroristis ordo membrorum est operating sub Civitatibus Foederatis Americae, Regime Government REGNUM / Unitarum / Imperii!
Char qui et fulcite opus est forma placet liberum augens actu CHANCE, pax et veritas in exponit:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome aut
CLANCULARIUS ARCANUS aut DONATIONS: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Cum dicta pacis vísio,
Community Activist Vogel Dionisia Newsome
Post Office (XXXI)CCLXV Box
Jackson in Mississippi (XXXIX)CCLXXXVI
PHONE (DXIII) 680-2922
013016 - DID YOU KNOW THIS ABOUT COMMUNITY ACTIVIST VOGEL DENISE NEWSOMEVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
CAN YOU IMAGINE
HOW MUCH QUICKER and SWIFTER
THE GOVERNMENT TRANSITION WOULD BE
IF GOD’S CHOSEN NATION OF PEOPLE
WOULD UNITE AND ASSIST IN THE
BUILDING OF THE GOVERNMENT LEFT FOR US?
GOD HAS ALREADY STRATEGICALLY
PLACED HIS CHOSEN NATION
IN THE GOVERNMENT JOBS
(Federal, State, City and Local)
FOR THE TRANSITION OF POWER!
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC) - HausaVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
da mafita ga zaman lafiya a duniya!
Daukar mataki da kuma kawo dogon m CHANGE!
Kamar yadda kuma da mutane suna tashi mai gidan da farko ka dage AGAINST Mũnãnan ayyuka da Miyagun Forces of Amurka 'DESPOTISM gwamnatin gwamnatin / Organization / Empire da kuma ta Yamma / Turai masõya, la'anta ga ganawarsu da kuma ayyukan ta'addanci m da Wariyar launin fata na Nazi da kuma / ko ta White Yahudawa-Zionist-Supremacist Members masu dogon m!
Babu wani uzuri ga Makircin Amurka 'DESPOTISM gwamnatin gwamnatin / Organization / Empire nishadantarwa a m kisan kai da kuma aiwatar da kisan gillar da ayyuka na Innocent maza, mata da yara! A tambaya shi ne, "YADDA sun wadannan Nazi zũriyarsu, da 'White Yahudawa / yahudawan sahyoniya / Supremacists takwarorinsu yarda don ƙirƙirar arairayi da kuma Lalata Beautiful Duniya-Of-Color, kuma ka kuɓuta!"
Community fafutukar Vogel Denise Newsome ne samar da SHAIDA kamar wannan daftarin aiki - Mai Tsarki:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
don tallafa "ABIN" Amurka 'DESPOTISM' yan ta'adda gwamnatin gwamnatin ta / Organization ta Nazi Jĩkõki, da / ko WHITE Yahudawa / yahudawan sahyoniya / Supremacists SAN Kuma a lõkacin da suka san da / ko ya kamata ya san mãsu laifi daga zunubansu. Duk da haka, bai son ransa shirya zuwa DUBI da sauran hanyar da, sanya kansu sama da Laws, da kuma ci gaba a kan hallakaswa Course a su nema wa "Fara yakin duniya III!"
Shi ne TIME for Duniya-Of-Color da Mutane da-na-Color farka da kuma sa wani KARSHEN ga WHITE Man ta nema a yi masa tseren isa, a kan DUK sauran Races!
NO mafi WARS, shi ne lokacin da za a gurfanar da fadar White Man ta kungiyar 'yan ta'adda Members cewa suna aiki up karkashin sunan Amurka' DESPOTISM gwamnatin gwamnatin / Organization / Empire!
Don Allah ji free don ba da sadaka da kuma TAIMAKO aiki da shi ne ainihin kawo CHANGE, da zaman lafiya da fallashi na GASKIYA a:
https://www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome ko
Confidential ko m gudunmawa: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
Tare da zaman lafiya da soyayya,
Community fafutukar Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
WAYAR: (513) 680-2922
032917 The United States FALL - Building A GovernmentVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
“The UNITED STATES’ FALL: BUILDING A GOVERNMENT ON THE SHOULDERS OF GREAT LEADERS” is an Article to provide a SYNOPSIS on a VERY HISTORICAL UNDERTAKING – i.e. the BUILDING of a NEW Government that will serve Blacks/African-Americans/Negroes/People-Of-Color presently residing on United States of America Soil; however, WITHOUT a Government of their own. We WILL be using SOME of the SAME processes that led to the United States building its DESPOT; however, the NEW Government WILL NOT be a DESPOT and WILL BE a Government RUN and CONTROLLED by Blacks/African-Americans/Negroes/People-Of-Color and NOT a SMALL Group as the WHITE Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists in CONTROL of the United States’ DESPOT that has its HEADQUARTERS in Washington, D.C.
The Declaration of Independence was EXECUTED on July 4, 1776. We are in the PROCESS of Drafting up
11 YEARS LATER the United States’ Constitution was Created on September 17, 1787.
50 YEARS LATER was when the OLDEST Historically Black College and University (HBCU) - Cheyney University of Pennsylvania was founded in 1837.
26 YEARS LATER the Emancipation Proclamation (Freeing Slaves) was Executed on January 1, 1863.
7 YEARS LATER the First Ku Klux Klan Act was Executed on February 21, 1870. The SECOND was Executed on April 20, 1871 – approximately TWO (2) Months AFTER the forming of the Ku Klux Klan’s Corporate Headquarters in the District of Columbia.
1 YEAR LATER the United States’ Corporation Headquarters in Washington, D.C. is established on February 21, 1871.
7 YEARS LATER the Ku Klux Klan’s Law Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz was ESTABLISHED in 1888.
Website: www.vogeldenisenewsome.net or www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
SlideShare: www.SlideShare.net/VogelDenise
Issuu: www.issuu.com/VogelDenise
Financially Donate To Support The Work At: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
101017 EEOC STATUS REQUEST (FHC)-BosnianVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Rješenje za mir u svijetu!
PREUZIMANJE AKCIJA i dovođenje odavno PROMJENE!
Kako sve više i više ljudi se bude i počinju da zauzme stav PROTIV zla i Wicked snaga Sjedinjenih Američkih Država despotizam vlada režim / Organizacija / carstvo i njegove West / evropskih saveznika, tužilaštva za zavere i terorističkih akata motivisan rasizam NAZI i / ili Beloj jevrejsko-cionista-rasista Članovi su odavno!
Nema opravdanja za zavera Sjedinjenih Američkih Država "despotizam vlada režim / Organizacija / Empire bave besmislenim ubistva i genocid prakse nevinih muškaraca, žena i djece! Postavlja se pitanje koje se postavlja je: "Kako su ti nacistički potomaka i njihove White Jevreja / cionisti / rasisti PARTNERI dozvoljeno da se stvori LAŽI i uništiti Prekrasna nacija-of-Color i prođu nekažnjeno!"
Aktivista zajednica Vogel Denise Newsome je pružanja dokaza kao što je ovaj dokument - engleska verzija:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101017-newsome-request-status-of-eeoc-investigation-first-heritage-credit
da podrži "ŠTA" NAZI Potomci Sjedinjenih Američkih Država "despotizam TERORISTA Vlade režima / organizacije i / ili bijela Jevreji / cionisti / rasisti znaju i kada su znali i / ili je trebalo da zna svoje zločine; Međutim, da li svojevoljno odlučili da gledaju na drugu stranu, postavite sebe iznad zakona, i nastaviti RAZARANJEM predmeta u njihovoj potrazi za "Start SVJETSKOG RATA III!"
To je vrijeme da nacija-of-Color i People-of-boji se probuditi i stati na kraj belog čoveka QUEST da svoje rase Superior odnosu na sve druge trke!
Nema više rata, da je vrijeme da procesuira terorističke organizacije Članovi belog čoveka koji rade se pod maskom Sjedinjenih Američkih Država despotizam vlada režim / Organizacija / carstva!
Uz mir i ljubav,
Aktivista zajednica Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
TELEFON: (513) 680-2922
122018-USDOJ & ICC (Mississippi Under Terrorist Attacks)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
URGENT NOTIFICATION: THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY ARE PRESENTLY UNDER TERRORIST ATTACKS!
As of 12/20/18, this document may also be viewed at the following LINKS:
FilesAnywhere: https://login.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8c69678d5f647178b0
UIE Website: http://uticainternationalembassy.website/index.php/pages/12-20-18-state-of-ms-uie-under-terrorist-attacks
The United States of America and its Confederate States of America have LAUNCHED “ALL OUT” Terrorist Attacks and have sent their Nazis and/or Confederates, Ku Klux Klan and WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists out on the Interstates/Highways/Roads/Streets, etc. DISGUISED in Law Enforcement Uniforms to TERRORIZE, THREATEN, HARRASS, INTIMIDATE, KIDNAP, KILL/MURDER, etc. specifically TARGETING Natives, Native Americans and those who have been LABELED as Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-Of-Color – i.e. with MAJOR focus on TARGETING the Utica International Embassy’s Government Officials and Citizens/Supporters of this Legally/Lawfully formed “NEW” Government!
PLEASE BE ADVISED that such UNLAWFUL Roadblocks are PROHIBITED under the United States of America’s FEDERAL Laws and that the STATES (as Mississippi) are under the JURISDICTION of the USA. In 1966, the Supreme Court of the United States of America (In USA vs. Herbert Guest) found such ROADBLOCKS to be in VIOLATION of Sovereign Citizens’ Rights and Privileges, etc. The Harold Guest Lawsuit being brought by the USA! A copy of the Supreme Court’s Decision may be found at the following LINK:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-vs-herbert-guest-highlighted
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
Через Ньюсом в КСРТ и расследования жалоб (ы), посмотрите, как корпорации в качестве первого наследия Кредит ООО используйте Вилли Lynch практики в своей повседневной деятельности - то есть SLAVEMASTERS, опираясь на невежественных черно-американцев, чтобы атаковать и уничтожить друг друга, пока они сидеть сложа руки и смеяться над этим Глупые BLACK-американцы!
02/09/15 публичный релиз EEOC обвинение против 1-Й НАСЛЕДИЕ КРЕДИТ - Соединенные Штаты систематических РАСИСТСКОЙ террористических Америки ДЕЙСТВИЙ ВЫСТУПИЛ - смотреть и видеть, как президент США Барак Обама, Конгресс США, их адвокаты Бейкер Donelson Бирман Колдуэлл и Берковиц вместе с их западными / Европейские / ЕВРЕЙСКАЯ союзники будут работать прикрыть свои преступления и гражданские несправедливости!
Слышали ли Вы о Вилли Lynch? Вы видели Вилли Lynch на практике? Там нет ничего, как получение афро-американского образования.
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/020915-public-release-eeoc-charge-against-1st-heritage-credit-russian
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/030215-request-to-reopen-eeoc-charge-1st-heritage-credit-russian
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/willie-lynch-letter
www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
Hatian creole thank you to republic of ecuador (asylum of julian assange)VogelDenise
Etazini yo nan Amerik panse ke li se pi wo pase lalwa a ak repete rpoz sou lè l sèvi avèk "fron" (tankou manman Angletè alye ak sè alye Syèd) nan kache wòl li nan zak sa yo pote kont Julian Assange reprezay / KRIMINÈL pou rapòte NEWS a ak Ekspoze peyi Etazini pou yon krim lagè Amerik la / VYOLASYON Nuremberg la ak lòt zak teroris! Tanpri pran pasyans, Etazini nan Amerik Prezidan Barack Obama ak avoka li / Blan supremasi (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) pral lage tèt la nan peyi Etazini nan Amerik "vini sou yon plato!"
031816 - WORLD NEWS RELEASE (Belarusian)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (абмежаванняў на эксклюзіўных правах - Кірмаш выкарыстанне)
Гэта навіны і інфармацыя , што сіяністы / белы расіст , і гэта ілюзорна група пад назвай ілюмінатаў , што Фогель Дэніз Ньюс спыталі , ці ведае яна хацела б трымацца далей ад уладароў СМІ. Вы не атрымаеце гэта ў кантраляваных Навіны Форумы , таму што яны занадта занятыя зманлівым і ўводзяць у зман людзей , а не СПРАВАЗДАЧНАСЦЬ ПРАЎДУ!
Май іншых народаў , якія былі прыгнечаны дэспатызму урадам Злучаных Штатаў Амерыкі і яе саюзнікаў; Аб'яднаецца з Vogel Denise Ньюс і забяспечыць зваротную сувязь, распаўсюджваць слова, падтрымка працы. , ,
Вавілон Упаў - - Давайце Прывад Пазногці ў магіле!
BAKER DONELSON - Attorney Layoffs The SINKING OF A TERRORIST REGIME (DUTCH)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE) - For Educational and Information Purposes
Openbare kennisgeving: Vertel het verder - - helpen ondersteunen de ineenstorting van de Verenigde Staten despotisme TERRORIST OVERHEID REGELING!
Houdt u er rekening mee in de TREKKEN van contracten, INTREKKING bedrijven en FINANCIËN terroristische advocatenkantoren als Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz. . .
Het zinken van de BAKER donelson BOUDREZ CALDWELL & Berkowitz SHIP is veel te laat!
Verenigen samen om take down deze terroristische despotisme regering MASTERMIND!
RECURSOS ECONOMICOS DE LOS GAD ART. 270-274
PLAN NACIONAL DE DESARRROLLO ART. 279-280 TNNV-AB GUILLERMO FALCONI
SIST. ECONOMICO Y POLITICA ECONOMICA ART. 283-284
LIST OF JEWISH AMERICAN BUSINESSPEOPLE - Wikipedia As Of 07/17/16VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is a listing of some of the Jewish American Business People listed in Wikipedia as of 07/17/16 – i.e. a SELECTIVE Listing it appears!
01/07/19 UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY'S Response To USA Shutdown & STATUS Of C...VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is the Utica International Embassy’s RESPONSE to the USA’s Government SHUTDOWN and THREATS by the USA’s President Donald Trump to impose a “NATIONAL EMERGENCY” if he does NOT get the BILLIONS OF DOLLARS he, his Legal Counsel (Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz) and their CO-Conspirators (i.e. Israel, etc.) seek to EXTORT through such RANSOM Demands as they NOW hold Americans HOSTAGE! The UIE “WILL USE” such TERRORIST Acts of the USA’s DESPOTISM Government Regime to its advantage should such a “NATIONAL EMERGENCY” be made which WILL SUPPORT the UIE’s WAR ON TERRORISM against the USA’s Government Officials – i.e. Nazis and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists!
The UIE has also UPDATED the Counts (approximately 65) for the United States Department of Justice Criminal Complaint/International Criminal Court Communication being drafted and will be using the USA HOSTAGE Crisis of the Americans and the THREATS that have been leveled AGAINST the Utica International Embassy’s Government Officials and Citizens/Supporters.
With Warmest Regards,
Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Utica International Embassy
(888) 700-5056
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
See if you can see the NEXUS/CONNECTION/RELATIONSHIP with the Anna Louise Inn Scandal/Lawsuit and Ladye Margaret Townsend's BANKRUPTCY Action. If NOT, we are going to show the PUBLIC/WORLD the PATTERN-OF-CRIMINAL practices that have United States of America's President Barack Obama's and his Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz' PARTICIPATION all OVER IT!
121815 - OBJECTION TO 120815 ORDER ON OBJECTION (Townsend Matter)VogelDenise
POWER WITH "WE THE PEOPLE" - KNOW YOUR LEGAL/LAWFUL RIGHTS TO OVERTHROW THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT and have a GOVERNMENT that WORKS for "WE THE PEOPLE!"
DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - Overthrowing Despotism, Political Corruption, Judicial Corruption/Injustices. . . .HEALING and RESTORING a NATION!
121717 - PELICIA HALL- COMMISSIONER MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
NO PATTY CAKE PLAYING! NO SELLOUT IN COMMUNITY ACTIVIST VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME!
JUST BE PATIENT AND ALLOW BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ and its CLIENTS as STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT REGIME to LYNCH THEMSELVES! LOL!
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome just LAUGH at the IGNORANCE of the HOUSE Niggeroes being used in the IMPLEMENTATION of the 13rh Amendment Scam!
EVIDENCE NEEDED for the CRIMINAL Complaint to be submitted to the INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT!
For instance, Pelica Hall is the Commissioner for the State of Mississippi’s DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION! She was EMPLOYED at the Law Firm of Page Kruger & Holland at the time of the 02/14/06 KIDNAPPING of Vogel Denise Newsome.
The 02/14/06 KIDNAPPING of Newsome was then COVERED UP under FALSE CRIMINAL Charges brought against her by CONSTABLE Jon Lewis – i.e. an EMPLOYEE of the State of Mississippi and Legal Counsel being BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ!
Look at the STUPIDITY of the United States’ DESPOTISM Terrorist Government Regime and its NAZI and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists to engage in such CRIMINAL ACTS and then TURN to their CONTROL of the GOVERNMENT to bring FALSE Criminal Charges AGAINST Vogel Denise Newsome.
PELICIA HALL was employed at Page Kruger & Holland at the time of such CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES – i.e. HUNGERING to become a SHAREHOLDER!
From this documentation, you can SEE for yourself HOW it appears she has SOUGHT to be REWARDED for purposes of RETAINING her SILENCE in the CRIMINAL Kidnapping and REPORTING by Newsome.
With PEACE & LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO DONATE TO SUPPORT THE WORK AT:
www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
OR CONFIDENTIAL/ANONYMOUS DONATIONS: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
10/28/19 Michael Miller-EL Pretrial Hearing & International Tribunal OptionVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
11/04/19 “FIRST” PRETRIAL HEARING - DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
DRAFT: STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE PROSECUTION OF PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW COMMITTED IN THE TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SINCE 1921____
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
York County, Virginia General District Court Filing Traffic CourtChuck Thompson
http://www.gloucestercounty-va.com Posted for a story posted on the linked website dated April 22nd, 2015. Shows how the court ignored the rules of the court and railroaded a person who was fraudulently charged in our opinion.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION - DEMAND FOR DISCHARGE OF MORTGAGE (Regions Bank)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
Requests for Admissions – Settlement Demand – Demand for Discharge of Mortgage
This is a document that is being published as many victims of the United States of America’s DESPOTISM CORPORATION Empire’s FORECLOSURE Scams are looking for solutions and remedies to address the INJUSTICES they are being subjected to as a direct and proximate result of the USA’s Despotism Empire’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, its Clients and/or their CO-Conspirators’ engagement in WAR Crimes and other Criminal Acts.
With the USA’s CORPORATION Nazi/Zionists release of the CORONAVIRUS for purposes of War Crimes, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, EXTERMINATION of the Civilian Population – i.e. for POPULATION CONTROL as well as in keeping with Nazi Leader Adolf Hitler’s NEW World Order Agenda to make the WHITE Race SUPREME over ALL other Races – this document is being shared for Educational and Informational reasons to provide those who are VICTIMS of such War Crimes that seek to ENSLAVE them, MURDER them and ROB them of their LIVELIHOOD, Home, Property, etc., through FORECLOSURE Scams, that there may be INTERNATIONAL OPTIONS available to them (i.e. especially if they are Natives/Indians/Moorish Nationals/Moorish Americans…)
A judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the past 11 years, Sonia Sotomayor is now high on lists that lawyers and politicians have assembled of possible replacements for Justice David H. Souter of the Supreme Court. She has a reputation as a sharp, outspoken and fearless jurist, and many of her opinions have demonstrated a willingness to take the government to task whenever she believes the circumstances warrant it.
030716 OBJECTION TO 022516 FINAL DECREE (Townsend Matter)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
This is the Court pleading filed on 03/07/16, in the United States Bankruptcy Court – Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson). This document has been filed and Court pleading DRAFTED to EXPOSE and SHARE information with the Public/World of HOW the DESPOTISM Zionist/White Supremacist Government Regime of the United States of America has gone about INFILTRATING the BRANCHES of Government (FEDERAL & STATE – Executive, Legislative and Judicial) for purposes of PROMOTING their RACIST/TERRORIST Attacks on Blacks/African-Americans/People-of-Color.
06/29/18 GOOD-FAITH DEMAND. . . 20180460 (Planters Bank Foreclosure Scams)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This is the Court pleading filed In the Chancery Court of Washington County, Mississippi regarding the FORECLOSURE SCAMS being run by Planters Bank & Trust Company and its Legal Counsel Nick Crawford/Crawford Law Firm wherein it is Ira B. Johnson’s DUTY and/or OBLIGATION to NOTIFY the Court of the FRAUD and other Crimes being carried out upon it. Rather than wait on Planters Bank & Trust Company to do the RIGHT THING and return her Land(s) and/or Property(s) to her, approximately THREE Weeks later NOTHING! Therefore, Ira B. Johnson is moving forward in NOTIFYING the Court, etc.
NOW let’s watch and see HOW this Court’s Judge(s) address the FRAUD and other Crimes reported. Moreover, whether or not the Judge report the FRAUD and other Criminal activities of Planters Bank & Trust Company and its Lawyer (Nick Crawford/Crawford Law Firm) to the applicable authorities for investigation(s) and prosecution(s) as required by Statutes/Laws governing such matters!
03/12/11 PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT (President Barack Obama)VogelDenise
03/12/11 PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT (President Barack Obama).
This is the ORIGINAL Lawsuit involving United States of America President Barack Obama that the United States White, United States Supreme Court and United States Congress is trying to KEEP from being filed!
01/27/18 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT - PLANTERS BANK FORECLOSURE SCAMSVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
1 Timothy 1:8 - But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.
As required by National and International Laws this PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT has been drafted to serve as EVIDENCE meeting the PREREQUISITE requirements affording the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime and its NAZI and WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists to CORRECT the INJUSTICES ADDRESSED!
Furthermore, will provide SUFFICIENTEVIDENCE in the EXPOSURE of the WAR CRIMES of and against SOVEREIGN Citizens (i.e. specifically Natives, Native-Americans and Blacks/Negroes/African-Americans/People-of-Color) within the Lands/Territories KNOWN as the United States of America.
Serving as further EVIDENCE of the ABUSE OF POWERS (by TRUSTEES) who may assert such TITLES and/or POSITIONS through TREATIES, etc. that have been BREACHED!
We will leave it at that in that we are aware of LEGAL and LAWFUL avenues available to VICTIMS of such VICIOUS attacks from the NAZI and/or WHITE Jews/Zionists/Supremacists that have managed to INFILTRATE the United States of America’s Government and FORM the DESPOTISM Empire/Regime that is UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY presently in POWER!
OUR WEBSITES:
Vogel Denise Newsome: www.vogeldenisenewsome.net
Utica International Embassy: www.vogeldenisenewsome.com
You can GIVE LOVE DONATIONS To Support The Work At:
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, Mississippi 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922
TOLL FREE: (888) 700-5056
MESSAGE: (601) 282-7119
USA: www.Cash.me/$VogelDeniseNewsome
ANONYMOUS/CONFIDENTIAL: https://donorbox.org/community-activist-vogel-denise-newsome
With PEACE and LOVE,
Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome
10/05/18 NOTICE OF NONATTENDANCE 100818 COURT MATTER (Cary Johnson)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - IN THE MUNICIPAL COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI: CASE NO. GP10042161 - Notice of Non-Attendance at October 8, 2018 Court Action - Response Demanded By Friday, October 19, 2018; Notification That Mississippi Department Of Public Safety Contacted On 10/01/18 and Demand Issued For Response By 10/16/18 Regarding Matter(s) Relevant To This Court Action; and Notice of Process Begun Seeking International Judicial Prosecution Through The Applicable International Tribunals – INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT Reference OTP-CR-367/18
LET US BE VERY CLEAR, the Utica International Embassy’s Officials WILL proceed with Criminal Acts against the INDIVIDUALS identified and/or to be named/identified! On 10/08/18, while the Washington County, Mississippi Court and its TAINTED/CORRUPT Officials will be PREYING on the IGNORANCE and ILLITERACY of their Victims of the Laws, their CRIMINAL Acts (i.e. USURPING Jurisdiction in matters KNOWN to its Officials are LACKING, ABUSE OF POWERS, etc.) are a matter of PUBLIC RECORD and will be USED to support the THREATS on the Lives, Liberties, Freedoms of SOVEREIGN Citizens by the United States of America’s/State of Mississippi’s TERRORISTS and Members within such TERRORIST Cells (as the Greenville, Mississippi Police Department)!
WITH WARMEST REGARDS,
Utica International Embassy,
c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Website: https://uticainternationalembassy.website
Slideshare: www.Slideshare.net/VogelDenise
COUNT 4 - CONSPIRACY TO MURDER (For UIE...Criminal Complaint)VogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA’S A/K/A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S CONFEDERATES, KU KLUX KLAN, WHITE SUPREMACISTS/ZIONISTS CONSPIRE TO HAVE THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY’S INTERIM PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME ASSASSINATED AND/OR MURDERED
01/17/20 CANCELLING THE USA DESPOTISM CORPORATION EMPIRE CONTRACTSVogelDenise
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
This Court document is being shared as the Utica International Embassy and other Nations move forward in EXPOSING the United States of America's DESPOTISM "CORPORATION" Empire and the WAR Crimes of its Nazis/Zionists that control and run this Despot!
IF the USA is seen as "a PRIVATELY held Company" THEN people are NOT required to get a COMPANY ID known as a Driver's License, etc. - i.e. moreover, are NOT REQUIRED into Contracts/Agreements to get documents such as a Driver's License, Vehicle Registration, Social Security Card, etc.
06/10/13 - RESPONSE TO 040913 US SUPREME COURT LETTER (STOR-ALL)VogelDenise
We are working on getting this document translated in multiple languages due to overwhelming INTERNATIONAL interests. Please be patient and feel free to check back for other translations.
Similar to 061716 - OJECTION(s) To 060716 ORDER & PUBLIC NOTIFICATION (Townsend) (20)
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
Future Of Fintech In India | Evolution Of Fintech In IndiaTheUnitedIndian
Navigating the Future of Fintech in India: Insights into how AI, blockchain, and digital payments are driving unprecedented growth in India's fintech industry, redefining financial services and accessibility.
03062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
In a May 9, 2024 paper, Juri Opitz from the University of Zurich, along with Shira Wein and Nathan Schneider form Georgetown University, discussed the importance of linguistic expertise in natural language processing (NLP) in an era dominated by large language models (LLMs).
The authors explained that while machine translation (MT) previously relied heavily on linguists, the landscape has shifted. “Linguistics is no longer front and center in the way we build NLP systems,” they said. With the emergence of LLMs, which can generate fluent text without the need for specialized modules to handle grammar or semantic coherence, the need for linguistic expertise in NLP is being questioned.
Welcome to the new Mizzima Weekly !
Mizzima Media Group is pleased to announce the relaunch of Mizzima Weekly. Mizzima is dedicated to helping our readers and viewers keep up to date on the latest developments in Myanmar and related to Myanmar by offering analysis and insight into the subjects that matter. Our websites and our social media channels provide readers and viewers with up-to-the-minute and up-to-date news, which we don’t necessarily need to replicate in our Mizzima Weekly magazine. But where we see a gap is in providing more analysis, insight and in-depth coverage of Myanmar, that is of particular interest to a range of readers.
31052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
ys jagan mohan reddy political career, Biography.pdfVoterMood
Yeduguri Sandinti Jagan Mohan Reddy, often referred to as Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, is an Indian politician who currently serves as the Chief Minister of the state of Andhra Pradesh. He was born on December 21, 1972, in Pulivendula, Andhra Pradesh, to Yeduguri Sandinti Rajasekhara Reddy (popularly known as YSR), a former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, and Y.S. Vijayamma.
role of women and girls in various terror groupssadiakorobi2
Women have three distinct types of involvement: direct involvement in terrorist acts; enabling of others to commit such acts; and facilitating the disengagement of others from violent or extremist groups.
01062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
27052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
हम आग्रह करते हैं कि जो भी सत्ता में आए, वह संविधान का पालन करे, उसकी रक्षा करे और उसे बनाए रखे।" प्रस्ताव में कुल तीन प्रमुख हस्तक्षेप और उनके तंत्र भी प्रस्तुत किए गए। पहला हस्तक्षेप स्वतंत्र मीडिया को प्रोत्साहित करके, वास्तविकता पर आधारित काउंटर नैरेटिव का निर्माण करके और सत्तारूढ़ सरकार द्वारा नियोजित मनोवैज्ञानिक हेरफेर की रणनीति का मुकाबला करके लोगों द्वारा निर्धारित कथा को बनाए रखना और उस पर कार्यकरना था।
061716 - OJECTION(s) To 060716 ORDER & PUBLIC NOTIFICATION (Townsend)
1. 17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
For Educational and Information Purposes!
JUNE 17, 2016 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY PLEADING
THAT IT APPEARS THAT THE
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT and ITS LEGAL COUNSEL
BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ
ARE OBSTRUCTING FROM BEING FILED –
CRIMES ARE BEING COMMITTED
TO KEEP THIS INFORMATION OUT OF PUBLIC VIEW
DID YOU KNOW THAT
THE KLAN’S/UNITED STATES’ LAWYERS/ATTORNEYS –
BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ
HAS AN OFFICE RIGHT DOWN THE STREET
FROM THE PULSE NIGHTCLUB and IS LEGAL COUNSEL TO
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI)
THAT HELD MEETINGS
WITH THE ALLEGED GUNMAN
ACCUSED OF THE RECENT (06/2016)
MASS PULSE NIGHTCLUB SHOOTING IN
ORLANDO, FLORIDA?
TARGETING CHRISTIANS – –MUSLIMS
AND NOW HOMOSEXUALS. . .
IT APPEARS THAT THE LAW FIRM OF
BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ
and IT’s KLAN/WHITE SUPREMACIST/ZIONIST CLIENTS
ARE THE NO. 1 DOMESTIC and
INTERNATIONAL TERRORISTS
2. IN THE WORLD and
ARE USING THEIR CONTROL OF THE MEDIA NETWORKS
TO FALSIFY NEWS REPORTED and EXPLOIT
THEIR CRIMES OF HATRED and
THE FRAMING OF INNOCENT PEOPLE
THAT THEY KILL/MURDER
IN ALLEGED STANDOFFS TO
KEEP ALLEGED SHOOTERS
and EXPOSING THEM!FROM TALKING
It Appears USING Government Agencies’
Resources To PLAN, ORCHESTRATE and
CARRY OUT Their TERRORIST ACTS
And Then Proceed To
COVER-UP/DESTROY EVIDENCE!
Was The PULSE Nightclub On President Barack Obama’s “SECRET KILL LIST”
That He Goes Over With His Advisor Baker Donelson. . .?
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-secret-kill-list-13166139
17 USC § 107 (LIMITATIONS On EXCLUSIVE Rights - FAIR USE)
For Educational and Information Purposes!
OPEN INVITATION - PUBLIC REQUEST:
IT APPEARS THAT
DOMESTIC and INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTION
ARE LEGALLY and NEEDED TO BRING THELAWFULLY
UNITED STATES DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT REGIME AND
ITS TERRORIST LEADER(S) FRONTING AS A
LAW FIRM BY THE NAME OF
BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ
AND ITS WHITE SUPREMACIST/ZIONISTS CLIENTS
!TO JUSTICE
It Appears That Out of FEAR Of The
EXPOSURE Of A FRAUDULENTLY CREATED
CORPORATION (UNITED STATES – That Has
HIJACKED The United States of America’s
Government) IS COMING TO LIGHT,
DISTRACTION(S) AS “MEDIA OVERKILL” OF
THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION SCAM
IS BEING USED!
Using The MEDIA Networks For Purposes Of
The HILLARY CLINTON and DONALD TRUMP
SPECTACLE - - - RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT
OF THIS FRAUDULENTLY-CREATED
CORPORATION!
TERRORIST ACTS are BEING CARRIED OUT FOR PURPOSES OF FEAR and CONTROL! AT
LEAST KNOW THE TRUTH AS TO WHY IT APPEARS THIS FRAUDULENT CORPORATION’S
BUSINESS PARTNERS ARE PULLING OUT – U.S. TREASURIES BY FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS
ARE BEING DUMPED - - CUTTING LOSSES and LEAVING THEM HOLDING THE BAG! - - - THIS
FRAUDULENT CORPORATION’S CRIMES ARE COMING TO LIGHT!
3. Page 1 of 63
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI
IN RE:
LADYE M. TOWNSEND CHAPTER 7
DEBTOR CASE NO. 11-00167-ee
CREDITOR VOGEL NEWSOME’S
OBJECTION TO 06/07/16 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE. . .(DOCKET NO. 78);
TIMELY NOTIFICATION TO BANKRUPTCY COURT ADVISING 06/07/16 ORDER DENYING
MOTION TO REOPEN CASE. . .- DOCKET NO. 78 – IS A NONAPPEALABLE ORDER;
TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION VIOLATIONS - -
TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF INFRINGEMENT UPON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS;
REQUEST TO BE ADVISED OF CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS;
REITERATION OF MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE EDWARD ELLINGTON; and
NOTIFICATION TO THE PUBLIC and WORLD/FOREIGN LEADERS1
COMES NOW Creditor Vogel Newsome (“Newsome”) without waiving her rights, without submitting
to the jurisdiction of this Court, without waiving previous defenses and claims set forth in her pleadings filed
with this Court and files this her, OBJECTION TO 06/07/16 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE. .
.(DOCKET NO. 78); TIMELY NOTIFICATION TO BANKRUPTCY COURT ADVISING 06/07/16 ORDER DENYING
MOTION TO REOPEN CASE. . . – DOCKET NO. 78 – IS A NONAPPEALABLE ORDER; TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION VIOLATIONS; TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF INFRINGEMENT UPON
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS; REQUEST TO BE ADVISED OF CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS; REITERATION OF MOTION
FOR RECUSAL OF JUDGE EDWARD ELLINGTON; AND NOTIFICATION TO THE PUBLIC AND WORLD/FOREIGN
LEADERS (“CVNOT06/07/16ORDER”) pursuant to Rule 12, Rule 46, Rule 52 and Rule 60 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), 28 USC § 455; FRCP Rule 12(G) – consolidation of matters; United States
Constitution Article III/United States Constitution Article III, § 1; Fourteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution – and other statutes/laws governing said matters. In support thereof, Newsome states the
following:
1
NOTE: Boldface, italics and underline, etc. represents “emphasis” added.
4. Page 2 of 63
1. Newsome DOES NOT waive her defense to the jurisdictional issue which arises in this
matter. Therefore, Newsome does not submit to the jurisdiction of this Court. While
the laws are clear that Newsome cannot waive jurisdictional rights, she believes it is
necessary to provide information regarding decisions of court(s) on said issue(s):
In re Kirkland, 600 F.3d 310 (4th
Cir. 2010) - Subject matter
jurisdiction cannot be forfeited or waived, and can be raised by party,
or by court sua sponte, at any time prior to final judgment.
2. This instant “CVNOT06/07/16ORDER” is submitted in good faith and has not been
submitted for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment,
obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of
litigation, etc. and is filed to protect and preserve the rights of Newsome
secured/guaranteed under the United States Constitution and other laws of the
United States.
3. For purposes of PRESERVING the issues was and/or addressed in this instant
Bankruptcy filing as well as in her PREVIOUS filings, Creditor Newsome submits her
TIMELY OBJECTION(s) pursuant to Rule 46 of the FRCP to address the ERRORS in
this instant Bankruptcy action and the 06/07/16 ruling (DOCKET No. 78) by Judge
Edward Ellington.
A formal exception to a ruling or order is unnecessary. When the ruling or order
is requested or made, a party need only state the action that it wants the court to
take or objects to, along with the grounds for the request or objection. Failing to
object does not prejudice a party who had no opportunity to do so when the
ruling or order was made.
Colonial Refrigerated Transp., Inc. v. Mitchell, 403 F.2d 541 (5th
Cir. 1968) -
Purpose of rule requiring party to inform court at time order or ruling is made
to make known the action which he desires court to take, or his objection to
action of court and his grounds therefor, is to inform trial judge of possible
errors so that he may have an opportunity to reconsider his ruling and make any
changes deemed advisable. FRCP Rule46, 28 U.S.C.A.
Jenkins v. General Motors Corp., 446 F.2d 377 (5th
Cir. 1971) - Timely
objection is necessary to bring to trial court's attention alleged errors in conduct
of a trial.
Pigrenet v. Boland Marine & Mfg. Co., 656 F.2d 1091 (5th
Cir. 1981) -
Procedural objections to action of . . . trial court must be timely made to give
tribunal an opportunity to correct the error, if there be.
Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 185 F.3d 496 (5th
Cir. Miss., 1999) - A
failure to make a procedural objection waives the error, precluding review by
Court of Appeals.
4. For the purposes of expedition, saving of time and minimize costs associated with
litigation, Newsome consolidate her motions/pleadings herein pursuant to FRCP Rule
12(G) which states:
FRCP Rule 12(g) Joining Motions.
Right to Join. A motion under this rule may be joined with
any other motion allowed by this rule.
5. Page 3 of 63
5. This Bankruptcy Court LACKS Jurisdiction to act in that Creditor Newsome does NOT
waive Jurisdiction and does NOT authorize this Bankruptcy Court nor Judge Edward
Ellington to INFRINGE upon her Constitutional Rights and USURP authority in which
it/he LACKS! From the record EVIDENCE, statutes/laws and GUIDELINES
governing said matters, would properly place this Bankruptcy action as a NON-Core
Proceeding!
6. Because Debtor Townsend’s instant FRIVOLOUS Bankruptcy action a NON-Core
proceeding, it PRECLUDES this Court from entering a FINAL Judgment.
Nevertheless, this is EXACTLY what Judge Edward Ellington attempted to do on or
about 09/30/15, in efforts of DEPRIVING Creditor Newsome DUE PROCESS
of Law and EQUAL PROTECTION of the Laws! See DOCKET No. 61 of this
Bankruptcy Court.
7. This Bankruptcy Court and Judge Edward Ellington (“Judge
Ellington”) LACKS authority to act pursuant to the United States
Constitution Art. III. This Bankruptcy Court and Judge Ellington is
PURPORTING Jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and 28 U.S.C. § 157 –
i.e. which is NOT only in CLEAR ERROR but a GROSS
INFRINGEMENT upon Creditor Vogel Newsome’s
6. Page 4 of 63
CONSTITUTIONAL Rights and other Rights secured and/or
guaranteed under the statutes/laws governing said matters.
8. The Court of FIRST FILING and with PROPER and
LEGAL/LAWFUL JURISDICTION regarding the CIVIL Lawsuit
filed by Vogel Newsome in “Vogel Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt &
Sams, PA, etal.,” wherein Debtor Ladye M. Townsend is NAMED as
a Defendant, IS the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT –
Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704” that
was filed on or about 12/03/10!
I. LACK OF JURISDICTION:
There is authority that dismissal of a bankruptcy case does not mandate
dismissal of all pending adversary proceedings. However, if an entity
joined as a party in an adversary proceeding raised the defense that the
court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter and that defense is
sustained, the court must dismiss such entity from the adversary
proceeding. Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7019(1).
Mississippi Case: Rice v. McMullen, 43 So.2d 195 (Miss. 1949) - A
court must have jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the person of
7. Page 5 of 63
the parties, to give validity to its final judgments, orders and decrees,
and legislature cannot under the Constitution dispense with notice,
actual or constructive.
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Mississippi Public Service Commission, 135
F.Supp. 304 (S.D.Miss.Jackson.Div.,1955) - “Judicial power” is the
legal right, ability and authority to hear and decide a justifiable issue or
controversy, and such power is ordinarily vested in a court of justice.
U.S. Supreme Court Case: U.S. v. O'Grady, 89 U.S. 641(1874) -
“Jurisdiction” is the power to hear and determine a cause.
In re N.L.R.B., 58 S.Ct. 1001 (1938) - “Jurisdiction” means, in one
sense, the power to hear and determine the controversy presented, but a
court has “jurisdiction,” in another sense, to determine whether such
power is conferred upon it in the circumstances disclosed, and if it finds
such power is not granted, it lacks “jurisdiction” of the subject matter
and must refrain from an adjudication of rights in connection
therewith.
Other Court Cases: In re Jahelka, 2010 WL 5558990 (Bankr., 2010)
- Subject matter jurisdiction is threshold question in every case.
In re AE Liquidation, Inc., 435 B.R. 894 (2010) - A motion to dismiss
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction challenges the power of the
federal court to hear a claim or case. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b)(1),
28 U.S.C.A.
Issue of court's subject matter jurisdiction can be raised in any
manner, including on motion of one of the parties or by the court sua
sponte. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b)(1), 28 U.S.C.A
A) LACK OF JURISDICTION TO ENTER JUDGMENT: SUPREME COURT
DECISION – Please see Howard K. Stern, Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall v.
Elaine T. Marshall, Executrix of the Estate of E. Pierce Marshall, 564 U.S. 462; 131 S. Ct.
2594; 180 L. Ed. 2d 475 (2011) at EXHIBIT “A” attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full and, states in part:
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: . . . Upon the grant of a writ of certiorari, the
debtor challenged the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit which held that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to enter the
judgment.
OVERVIEW: The debtor contended that 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(b)(2)(C)
expressly granted the bankruptcy court jurisdiction over the debtor's
counterclaim to the creditor's claim, but the creditor argued that the
counterclaim was not within core bankruptcy jurisdiction and was
excluded as a personal injury claim. The U.S. Supreme Court held that,
although the bankruptcy court had the statutory authority to enter judgment on
the core counterclaim, it lacked the constitutional counterclaim by the debtor,
the bankruptcy court was not established under U.S. Const. art. III and
was not subject to the constitutional assurances of independence which
8. Page 6 of 63
would allow adjudication of the debtor's state common law claim. Further,
resolving the creditor's claim would not necessarily resolve the debtor's
counterclaim, and the debtor's claim was otherwise unrelated to the claim-
allowance process. Also, the debtor's claim did not involve public rights to
allow the congressional extension of bankruptcy jurisdiction, since the debtor's
claim flowed from state law rather than the federal bankruptcy scheme
authority to do so under U.S. Const. art. III. While § 157 purported to extend
bankruptcy jurisdiction to any.
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals
that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment.
[HN2] Bankruptcy courts may hear and enter final judgments in core
proceedings in a bankruptcy case. In non-core proceedings, the bankruptcy
courts instead submits proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to
the district court for that court's review and issuance of final judgment.
[HN3] With certain exceptions, the district courts of the United States have
original and exclusive jurisdiction of all bankruptcy cases under Title 11 of
the U.S. Code. 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(a). Congress divides bankruptcy
proceedings into three categories: those that arise under Title 11, those that arise
in a Title 11 case, and those that are related to a case under Title 11. 28
U.S.C.S. § 157(a). District courts may refer any or all such proceedings to the
bankruptcy judges of their district. District courts also may withdraw a case or
proceeding referred to the bankruptcy court for cause shown. § 157(d).
[HN4] Bankruptcy judges may hear and enter final judgments in all core
proceedings arising under Title 11 of the U.S. Code, or arising in a case under
Title 11. 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(b)(1). Core proceedings include, but are not limited
to 16 different types of matters, including counterclaims by a bankruptcy
debtor's estate against persons filing claims against the estate. § 157(b)(2)(C).
Parties may appeal final judgments of a bankruptcy court in core
proceedings to the district court, which reviews them under traditional
appellate standards. 28 U.S.C.S. § 158(a).
[HN6] When a bankruptcy judge determines that a referred proceeding is not a
core proceeding but is otherwise related to a case under Title 11 of the U.S.
Code, the judge may only submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions
of law to the district court. 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(c)(1). It is the district court
that enters final judgment in such cases after reviewing de novo any matter
to which a party objects.
[HN8] 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(b)(1) authorizes bankruptcy judges to enter final
judgments in core proceedings arising under Title 11 of the U.S. Code, or
arising in a case under Title 11. Section 157(c)(1) instructs bankruptcy judges
to instead submit proposed findings in a proceeding that is not a core
proceeding but that is otherwise related to a case under Title 11.
[HN12] Because branding a rule as going to a court's subject-matter jurisdiction
alters the normal operation of the adversarial system, courts are not inclined to
interpret statutes as creating a jurisdictional bar when they are not framed
as such.
[HN13] 28 U.S.C.S. § 157 allocates the authority to enter final judgment
between a bankruptcy court and a district court. § 157(b)(1), (c)(1). That
allocation does not implicate questions of subject matter jurisdiction. Under §
157(c)(2), parties may consent to entry of final judgment by bankruptcy
9. Page 7 of 63
judge in non-core case. By the same token, § 157(b)(5) simply specifies where
a particular category of cases should be tried.
DECISION: [***475] Bankruptcy court's entry of final judgment on
debtor's counterclaim against creditor, though valid under 28 U.S.C.S. §
157, held to violate Article III of Federal Constitution.
9. Debtor Lady M. Townsend’s Bankruptcy action is a NON-Core proceeding. This
Court was TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY notified of the NON-Core
status of this Bankruptcy action through Creditor Newsome’s REBUTTAL Motion filed
on or about 10/15/15, OBJECTING to this Court’s 09/30/15 Final Judgment. See
DOCKET No. 64.
10. This Bankruptcy Court/Judge Edward Ellington is alleging JURISDICTION pursuant to
28 USC § 1334 and 28 USC § 157 and FALSE claims of a Core proceeding – when it
is NOT – in efforts of FRAUDULENTLY and DECEPTIVELY obtaining Jurisdiction
in which this Court and he LACKS!
11. Debtor Ladye M. Townsend in filing this FRIVOLOUS Bankruptcy action NAMED
Vogel Newsome as a CREDITOR for purposes of UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY
obtaining a DISCHARGE from damages Newsome seeks to receive from her WELL-
PRESERVED Civil Lawsuit styled, “Vogel Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt & Sams, PA,
etal., USDC – Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704” that was
filed with the United States DISTRICT Court on or about 12/03/10!
12. In the Vogel Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt & Sams Lawsuit in the United States District
Court- Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No. 10-704, the RECORD
EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that Newsome PAID the $350 FILING FEE
and RECEIPT No. 34643006821 was ISSUED by said District
Court! - - - EMPHASIS ADDED! See Docket No. 1 in the
referenced District Court matter.
10. Page 8 of 63
13. In the Vogel Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt & Sams Lawsuit in the United States District
Court- Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No. 10-704, the RECORD
EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that Newsome TIMELY DEMANDED a JURY
TRIAL - - EMPHASIS ADDED – CONSTITUTIONAL
VIOLATION!
14. On or about 12/16/10, Creditor Newsome SERVED via United States Postal Service
Mail Defendant (in the Newsome vs. Mitchell McNutt & Sams CIVIL Lawsuit) Ladye
Margaret Townsend with “Waiver Of The Service Of Summons” which was
RECEIVED on or about 12/27/10:
and executed by Townsend on or about 01/20/11 – See
DOCKET No. 12 of USDC-Southern District of
Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704. SUBSTANTIAL
11. Page 9 of 63
EVIDENCE of Townsend’s KNOWLEDGE of the Civil
Lawsuit filed AGAINST her as well as other Defendants.
15. From Record EVIDENCE, Defendant Townsend in the Newsome vs. Mitchell McNutt
& Sams matter had until about 02/14/11 (i.e. 60 DAYS from 12/16/10 mailing of
Complaint) to file an Answer and/or Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff Vogel
Newsome’s CIVIL Lawsuit. However Defendant Townsend made a
FOOLISH and FATAL move to file a “VOLUNTARY
12. Page 10 of 63
PETITION” in this BANKRUPTCY action on or about 01/18/11,
with the United States Bankruptcy Court-Southern District Of
Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No. 11-00167!
See DOCKET No. 1 of this Bankruptcy Court – Case No. 11-00167!
16. Debtor Ladye M. Townsend in this instant Bankruptcy action – according to United
States Postal Service (“USPS”) information – OBTAINED KNOWLEDGE of
Creditor Newsome’s FILING of a CIVIL Lawsuit AGAINST her and other Defendants
through the Newsome vs. Mitchell McNutt & Sams, et al. matter on or about
12/27/11.
13. Page 11 of 63
17. As a DEFENSIVE move, Debtor Townsend filed her VOLUNTARY
PETITION with this Bankruptcy Court on or about 01/18/11, and then SWIFTLY
moved to EXECUTE the “WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS” in the Newsome
vs. Mitchell McNutt & Sams, et al. matter approximately TWO DAYS LATER
on or about 01/20/11 - - EMPHASIS ADDED!
18. In its 06/07/16 Order Denying Motion To Reopen Case . . .(Docket No. 78) of this
Bankruptcy Court, Judge Ellington asserts that Creditor Newsome IS NOT a Creditor;
however, the Record EVIDENCE will STRONGLY rebut such FRIVOLOUS assertion
in that Debtor Townsend in her document filed with this Court entitled, “MATRIX,”
indeed has NAMED Vogel Newsome as a CREDITOR! See DOCKET No. 2 of
this instant Bankruptcy action!
19. The Record EVIDENCE will also support that Vogel Newsome is NAMED as a
CREDITOR in a document filed in this instant Bankruptcy matter entitled, “ Notice of
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case, Meeting of Creditors, & Deadlines” – See DOCKET
No. 8.
14. Page 12 of 63
20. There is NO record evidence to support that the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT –
Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) “REFERRED” Vogel Newsome v.
Mitchell McNutt & Sams, PA, etal. – Case No. 10-704, to this
Bankruptcy Court because said District Court did NOT!
21. The CORE vs. NON-Core issue has been addressed in Creditor
Newsome’s pleading filed with this Bankruptcy Court on or
about 10/15/16 - DOCKET No. 64 – as well as in Creditor’s
subsequent pleadings. This is EVIDENCED in said Court’s
06/07/16, Order Denying Motion To Reopen. . . (Docket No. 78) in
that it ONLY provides FRIVOLOUS “Findings of Fact” which,
through this instant filing is TIMELY, PROPERLY,
ADEQUATELY and LAWFULLY/LEGALLY CONTESTED!
15. Page 13 of 63
22. Creditor Newsome’s OBJECTION pleadings and/or pleadings CONTESTING rulings by this
Bankruptcy Court as well as those that have been filed on behalf of Debtor Townsend will
SUSTAIN that Newsome does NOT CONSENT to this Bankruptcy Court’s Jurisdiction
and, therefore, Newsome does NOT CONSENT and VEHEMENTLY
OBJECTS to this Bankruptcy Court’s and Judge Edward
Ellington’s DEFIANCE of the CONSTITUTION and efforts to
ASSERT himself as an ARTICLE III Judge as well as this
Bankruptcy Court under U.S. Constitutional Art. III – ERROR. . .
.ERROR. . .ERROR - - GROSS Judicial USURPATION and
ABUSE OF POWER. . .!
B) FIRST-TO-FILE: Please see The Cadle Company v. Whataburger of Alice, Inc., 174
F.3d 599 (5th
Cir.); 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8615; 34 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 369 at EXHIBIT
“B” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
16. Page 14 of 63
OUTCOME: The dismissal of the plaintiff's claims was reversed because,
although the district court properly applied the first-to-file rule, it should not
have dismissed the claims but should have transferred them to the court of
first jurisdiction.
[HN3] Under the first-to-file rule, when related cases are pending before two
federal courts, the court in which the case was last filed may refuse to hear it
if the issues raised by the cases substantially overlap. The rule rests on principles
of comity and sound judicial administration. The concern manifestly is to avoid
the waste of duplication, to avoid rulings which may trench upon the
authority of sister courts, and to avoid piecemeal resolution of issues that
call for a uniform result.
[HN4] The first-filed court takes priority by virtue of its prior
jurisdiction over the common subject matter.
[HN5] Courts apply the first-to-file doctrine to avoid relitigation of, and
inconsistency with, issues already decided by other courts.
[HN6] The first-to-file rule not only determines which court may
decide the merits of substantially similar issues, but also establishes which
court may decide whether the second suit filed must be dismissed, stayed, or
transferred and consolidated.
OPINION. . .
The Cadle Company ("Cadle") appeals the district court's decision to dismiss
its RICO and state law claims under the "first-to-file" rule. Cadle argues that the
district court should have applied the rule only if it first determined that the
first-filed court's jurisdiction was proper, and erred by failing to do so in this
case. Cadle argues in the alternative that even if the lower court did not err in
applying the rule, it should have transferred the case rather than dismissed it. We
find that the district court properly applied the first-to-file rule, but should have
[**2] transferred the suit rather than dismissed it. The judgment of the district
court is therefore vacated and the case is remanded to the district court with
instructions to transfer the case. . . .
3. The District Court Properly Applied the First-To-File Rule
In sum, Cadle's view of the first-to-file rule is supported by neither the policies
behind the rule nor the cases that apply it. While the jurisdictional certainty of
the first-filed court might be a proper factor for a district court to weigh in
maximizing judicial economy, Cadle does not allege that the court below erred
in this respect. Nor could it: the district court in this case was the second-filed
court, and under Fifth Circuit precedent that balancing act is reserved only for
the first-filed court. "Once the likelihood of a substantial overlap between the
two suits has been demonstrated, it [is] was no longer up to the [second filed
court] to resolve [**19] the question of whether both should be allowed to
proceed." Mann, 439 F.2d at [*606] 407. The district court correctly refused
to act as a "super appellate court" by entertaining either Cadle's jurisdiction
or the defendants' standing arguments, and properly limited its inquiry to the
potential overlap between the two cases. By so limiting its analysis, the district
court indeed avoided trenching on the authority of its sister court, one of
"the very abuses the first-to-file rule is designed to prevent." Cadle, No. 97-
1502, slip op. at 4.
B. Transfer or Dismiss?
Cadle argues in the alternative that the district court should have transferred
the case back to the Laredo division rather than dismiss it entirely. We agree. "
17. Page 15 of 63
[HN6] The 'first to file rule' not only determines which court may decide the
merits of substantially similar issues, but also establishes which court may
decide whether the second suit filed must be dismissed, stayed or
transferred and consolidated." Sutter Corp., 125 F.3d at 920. As noted above,
"the Fifth Circuit adheres to the general rule, that the court in which an
action is first filed is the appropriate court to determine whether
subsequently filed cases [**20] involving substantially similar issues should
proceed." Save Power, 121 F.3d at 948. Thus, once the district court found
that the issues might substantially overlap, the proper course of action was for
the court to transfer the case to the Laredo court to determine which case
should, in the interests of sound judicial administration and judicial economy,
proceed. The district court erred by dismissing the suit.
MOTIONS DENIED. The judgment of the district court is VACATED, and
the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to transfer the
case to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Laredo Division, for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Each party
shall bear its own costs.
23. On or about 08/10/15, this Bankruptcy Court NOTICED a Bankruptcy Hearing for
09/18/15 – See DOCKET No. 15 in this instant Bankruptcy action.
18. Page 16 of 63
The above SNAPSHOT is an EXCERPT from a 09/18/15 Transcript of the Hearing before this
Bankruptcy Court and will SUSTAIN that Creditor Newsome advised of the FIRST-TO-FILE
Defense asserted as well as advised said Bankruptcy Court of its LACK OF JURISDICTION to
proceed. To NO avail! Therefore, SUPPORTING and SUSTAINING this Bankruptcy Court’s Judge
Edward Ellington’s ABUSE of POWER, USURPATION. . .DEPRIVATION of Due Process of
Law and DEPRIVATION of Equal Protection of Laws . . .
PLEASE BE ADVISED: That a copy of the 09/18/15 Bankruptcy Hearing has
been MADE AVAILABLE for PUBLIC viewing and/or listening at:
AUDIO MAY BE FOUND AT:
YOUTUBE AUDIO – MAY BE FOUND:
FILESANYWHERE AUDIO–MAY BE FOUND:
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/091815-u-s-
bankruptcy-hearing-recording-townsend-matter
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/091815-bankruptcy-
hearing-transcribed-townsend-matter-photos-added
https://youtu.be/viLIo7KObUU
https://www.filesanywhere.com/fs/v.aspx?v=8b706587596674
75ad6c
TRANSCRIPT MAY BE FOUND AT: http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/0091815-bankruptcy-
hearing-transcribed-townsend-matter-photos-added
NOTE: Multiple COPIES of this Transcript has been made and POSTED due to
what appears to be CONSPIRACIES (obstruction of LINKS by Web Host
Providers) to keep the PUBLIC/WORLD from getting a copy of it! So if interested
persons DO NOT get it at one location, hopefully, they will be able to get a copy
using one of the OTHER Links!
24. The Record EVIDENCE in this instant Bankruptcy action will SUSTAIN that Creditor
Newsome NOT ONLY through pleadings filed but also in the 09/18/15 Hearing
ADDRESSED the FACT that her CIVIL Lawsuit in “Vogel Newsome v.
Mitchell McNutt & Sams, PA, etal.,” wherein Debtor Ladye M.
Townsend is NAMED as a Defendant in the UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT – Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson),
Case No. 10-704” was filed FIRST - on or about 12/03/10. It
appears that Debtor Townsend then made a FATAL decision to file
this instant Bankruptcy and WAIVE filing an Answer and/or Rule 12
Responsive pleading in Newsome’s Civil Lawsuit in efforts of
AVOIDING Liability – i.e. which as a matter of law, Townsend has
FAILED and YES, is LIABLE for the injury/harm done to Plaintiff
Vogel Newsome!
19. Page 17 of 63
25. The Record EVIDENCE will
SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court
and/or Judge Edward Ellington has
ERRED regarding the FIRST-TO-
FILE Rule and is VERY ADAMANT
in USURPING his authority and
ABUSING POWERS in
FURTHERANCE of the
Conspiracies and RACIAL Animus
towards Creditor Vogel Newsome!
26. This Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington has KNOWINGLY
INFRINGED not only upon Rights secured under the United States Constitution, but is
ABUSING statutes/laws MANDATED to PREVENT such unlawful/illegal practices
Judge Ellington has become ACCUSTOMED to! Further SUPPORTING his being
UNFIT to even remain on the Judicial Bench as a Bankruptcy Judge and/or Judge in
any other Court of Law.
27. The Record EVIDENCE in this instant Bankruptcy matter as well as in this instant
“CVNOT06/07/16ORDER” will SUSTAIN that DUE to this Bankruptcy Court’s
LACK OF JURISDICTION as well as the FIRST-TO-FILE Rule, that this matter is to
be TRANSFERRED to the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT – Southern District
of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704 for handling.
28. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN this Bankruptcy Court’s and/or Judge Edward
Ellington’s KNOWLEDGE that Creditor Newsome’s CIVIL Lawsuit in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT-Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No.
10-704, is STILL an ACTIVE Lawsuit and has been PRESERVED by Newsome’s
FILING of the applicable pleadings! Moreover, her PRESERVATION of said issues
has been RECORDED in the 09/18/15 Bankruptcy Hearing!
29. The FIFTH CIRCUIT Court of Appeals ADHERES to the FIRST-TO-FILE Rule
and said Court’s decision will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court UPON
LEARNING of Creditor Newsome’s Lawsuit in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT in the Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No. 10-704, was to
TRANSFER Debtor Townsend’s Bankruptcy action to the DISTRICT COURT for
CONSOLIDATION with Creditor/Plaintiff Newsome’s Lawsuit. However, this did
NOT occur and Judge Edward Ellington is DETERMINED to DEFY the statutes/laws
governing said matters because for some STUPID reason, he may believe that he is
IMMUNED from CRIMINAL Liability and PROSECUTION in the ROLE he is
20. Page 18 of 63
playing in the CONSPIRACIES and other crimes being carried out AGAINST
Creditor/Plaintiff Vogel Newsome. Judge Edward Ellington IS NOT immune from
CRIMINAL Prosecution and/or LIABILITY! Furthermore, the Record EVIDENCE
will SUSTAIN that it appears that Judge Edward Ellington is a WILLING participant
in the CRIMINAL acts being carried out against Creditor Newsome and that said acts
are RACIALLY and DISCRIMINATORILY motivated!
30. This Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington has ERRED in the
DISCHARGE and DISMISSAL of Debtor Townsend’s Bankruptcy action in that
CLEARLY it LACKED Jurisdiction to execute the FRIVOLOUS Final Judgment
(DOCKET No. 61) it asserts has been issued and is acting in VIOLATION of the
United States Constitution and other statutes/laws governing said matters!
31. There is EVIDENCE to support that the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT –
Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704 (at DOCKET No. 14) was
TIMELY NOTIFIED of Debtor Ladye M. Townsend’s filing of this instant Bankruptcy
action; however, DELIBERATELY and with MALICIOUS and RECKLESS disregard
for the laws governing said matters, FAILED to NOTIFY this Bankruptcy Court of the
PENDING CIVIL Lawsuit!
32. There is Record EVIDENCE in this instant Bankruptcy action to SUSTAIN that
Creditor Newsome TIMELY NOTIFIED this Court of her OPPOSITION to Debtor
Townsend’s Bankruptcy action through her pleading entitled, “Creditor’s
Opposition/Response To Notice Of Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case, Meeting of Creditors,
& Deadlines; and Motion To Be Dismissed From Action.” (DOCKET No. 14-1).
21. Page 19 of 63
33. There is Record Evidence in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT – Southern
District of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704 – action to SUSTAIN that Debtor
Ladye M. Townsend’s filing of this instant Bankruptcy action has PROVEN to be
FATAL and she has LOST ALL rights to DEFEND against the claims set forth in
Creditor/Plaintiff Newsome’s CIVIL Lawsuit. When Debtor Townsend SHOULD have
PRESERVED her Rights to defend through ANSWER and/or a RESPONSIVE Rule 12
pleading in Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt & Sams, et al., Townsend FAILED to do so.
As a DIRECT and PROXIMATE result, Creditor/Plaintiff Newsome has moved in the
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for a DEFAULT JUDGMENT! See DOCKET
No. 17 in the DISTRICT COURT action!
C) NO FINAL JUDGEMENT HAS BEEN ENTERED IN UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT ACTION – SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI (JACKSON) – CASE NO. 10-704.
34. The Record EVIDENCE will support that in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No. 10-704, on or about
10/21/13, an "ORDER REASSIGNING CASE" was entered. See DOCKET No. 31 of
the DISTRICT COURT.
35. Creditor Newsome believes it is IMPORTANT to note that at the time of filing the
lawsuit in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi
(Jackson) – Case No. 10-704, it appears that the following HOUSE NEGROES were
being used for DECEPTIVE purposes:
Judge Henry T. Wingate Linda Randle Anderson Carlyle C. White (Butler, Snow,
O’Mara, Stevens & Cannada
22. Page 20 of 63
and have since been removed and replaced with the likes of the KLAN’s CHIEF Judge
Louis Guirola, Jr.
36. The Record EVIDENCE will support that AFTER the UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT in the Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt & Sams, et al. matter – Southern District
of Mississippi [Jackson] - (Case No. 10-704) entered its "ORDER REASSIGNING
CASE," it then moved SWIFTLY to enter TEXT ONLY ORDERS and/or ENTERIES
into the DOCKET of the Court for purposes of ABUSING the Court’s ELECTRONIC
FILING process, OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, DEPRIVING Plaintiff Newsome DUE
PROCESS of Law, DEPRIVING Plaintiff EQUAL PROTECTION of the Laws and
DEPRIVATION of other PROTECTED Rights secured and/or guaranteed under the
United States Constitution and/or other statutes/laws governing said matters.
37. The Record EVIDENCE will support that on or about 10/23/13, that in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) matter, it
appears that CHIEF DISTRICT Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. moved SWIFTLY to enter a
FINAL JUDGMENT (See Docket No. 33 - Case No. 10-704).
38. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 11/12/13, the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No.
10-704 filed Plaintiff Vogel Newsome's pleading entitled, “Motion For Relief From
The October 23, 2013 Final Judgment; Motion To Disqualify Judge Louis Guirola, Jr.
and DEMAND For JURY TRIAL.” See Docket No. 34
39. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 11/12/13,
the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of
Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No. 10-704 NOTED Plaintiff Vogel
Newsome's DEMAND for TRIAL BY JURY! See Docket No. 35.
40. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 11/13/13, in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No.
10-704, CHIEF District Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. AGAIN "ABUSED" the Court's
23. Page 21 of 63
ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM for purposes of DEPRIVING Plaintiff Newsome
DUE PROCESS of Law, DEPRIVING Plaintiff Newsome EQUAL PROTECTION of
the Laws and DEPRIVATION of other PROTECTED Rights secured/guaranteed under
the United States Constitution and other statutes/laws governing said matters. See
Docket reflecting 11/13/13 Entry.
41. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 12/02/13, the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No.
10-704 filed Plaintiff Newsome's pleading entitled, “Objection(s) To November 13, 2013
‘DOCKET’ Text Order; Findings Of Fact and Conclusion Issue(s); and DEMAND For
JURY TRIAL.” See DOCKET No. 36.
42. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 12/02/13,
the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of
Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No. 10-704 NOTED Plaintiff Vogel
Newsome's DEMAND for TRIAL BY JURY! See Docket No. 37.
43. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 12/12/13, in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No.
10-704 that CHIEF DISTRICT Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. entered an “Order Denying
Plaintiff’s DEMAND For JURY TRIAL and Objections RE Text Order.” See Docket
No. 38.
44. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 12/31/13, in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No.
10-704 that Plaintiff Vogel Newsome filed her pleading entitled, “Objection(s) To
December 12, 2013, Order Denying Plaintiff’s DEMAND For JURY TRIAL and
Objections RE Text Order and DEMAND For JURY TRIAL.” See Docket No. 39.
45. The Docket of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -
Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704 - will
further support that there are NO separate “documents – i.e.
Order(s) and/or Judgment(s)” pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP,
and, thus, Plaintiff Newsome will NOT waive any such requirements
for purposes of supporting the ERRORS and BIAS,
DISCRIMINATORY, PREJUDICIAL and UNLAWFUL/
24. Page 22 of 63
ILLEGAL handling of this lawsuit by said Court/Judge Louis
Guirola, Jr. Therefore, the “Docket Text” entries asserting
“Order(s)” and or “Judgment(s)” that Court/Judge Guirola attempted
to rely upon to DISMISS that lawsuit is clearly PROHIBITED and,
thus, has been TIMELY CONTESTED as a matter of statutes/laws
governing said matters:
Matter of American Precision Vibrator Co., 863 F.2d 428 (5th
Cir. 1989) - Undocketed orders cannot be enforced or appealed.
Orders do not become “final” until they are docketed.
46. The Record EVIDENCE will SUPPORT that on or about 01/03/14, in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No.
10-704 that CHIEF DISTRICT Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. entered an “Order Sanctioning
Plaintiff and Preventing Plaintiff From Filing Additional Pleadings Unless Granted
Prior Approval From A Judge Of This Court.” See Docket No. 40.
47. The record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that Creditor Newsome is a PAYING
Litigant (has PAID the $350 Filing Fee) and TIMELY DEMANDED a JURY
TRIAL at the time of filing her CIVIL Lawsuit in the UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No. 10-
704. Therefore, said Court has ERRED in its EFFORTS to DEPRIVE Plaintiff
Vogel Newsome access in that CIVIL Lawsuit.
Hooten v. Jenne, 786 F.2d 692 (5th
Cir. Miss. 1986): Right of access
to courts springs from First Amendment.
Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d 1115 (5th
Cir. 1982): Ready access to the
courts is a “fundamental constitutional right.”
Washington-Southern Nav. Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia
Steamboat Co., 44 S.Ct. 220 (1924): A citizen's right to sue in a court
having jurisdiction of the parties and the cause includes the right to
prosecute his claim to judgment.
25. Page 23 of 63
Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Morse, 87 U.S. 445 (1874): Every
citizen is entitled to resort to all the courts of the country and to invoke
the protection which all the laws or all those courts may afford him and
he cannot barter away his life, or his freedom, or his substantial rights.
Christopher v. Harbury, 122 S.Ct. 2179 (2002): Claim for
deprivation of constitutional right of access to courts must allege both:
(1) underlying cause of action, whether anticipated or lost, and (2)
official acts frustrating litigation.
Foster v. City of Lake Jackson, 28 F.3d 425 (5th
Cir. 1994): Right of
access to courts is implicated where ability to file suit was delayed or
blocked altogether.
Crowder v. Sinyard, 884 F.2d 804 (5th
Cir. 1989): If state officials
wrongfully and intentionally conceal information crucial to a person's
ability to obtain redress through the courts, and do so for purpose of
frustrating that right, and concealment and delay engendered thereby
substantially reduces likelihood of one's obtaining relief to which one is
otherwise entitled, state officials may have committed constitutional
violation by denying access to courts.
U.S. v. McRae, 702 F.3d 806 (5th
Cir. 2012): To maintain a
backward-looking claim for violation of right of access to courts, a
plaintiff must identify (1) a nonfrivolous underlying claim, (2) an
official act that frustrated the litigation of that claim, and (3) a remedy
that is not otherwise available in another suit that may yet be brought.
American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc. v. Mabus, 719
F.Supp. 1345 (S.D.Miss.Jackson.Div.,1989): Only a compelling state
interest can justify limitation of the right of access to the courts.
and because there is NO “FINAL” Judgment entered on Plaintiff
Newsome’s POST-Judgment pleadings CONTESTING and/or
OBJECTING to rulings, as a matter of law, the Newsome v. Mitchell
McNutt & Sams, et al. is STILL a VERY ACTIVE and VIABLE
Lawsuit despite the FALSE showing by said DISTRICT Court
alleging that it is CLOSED for DECEPTIVE purposes!
48. There is EVIDENCE that will SUPPORT that on or about 01/17/14, that Plaintiff
Vogel Newsome submitted for filing in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -
Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No. 10-704 her pleading entitled,
“Objection(s) To January 3, 2014 Order Sanctioning Plaintiff and Preventing Plaintiff From
Filing Additional Pleadings Unless Granted Prior Approval From A Judge Of This Court and
DEMAND For JURY TRIAL.” Said PROOF of SUBMITTAL of pleading which further
SUSTAINS the CRIMINAL acts by the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and
OBSTRUCTION of MAIL, OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE, DEPRIVATION of Due
Process of Law and DEPRIVATION of Equal Protection of the Laws, etc.! It is a
GOOD THING that Newsome used the United States Postal
Service’s MAIL-TRACKING procedures!
26. Page 24 of 63
49. The Record EVIDENCE will support that in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT - Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) - Case No. 10-704, there has
been NO "FINAL JUDGMENT" entered regarding Newsome's POST-
Judgment pleadings OBJECTING and/or CONTESTING the “TEXT ONLY” Order(s)
and 12/12/13 Order entered by CHIEF DISTRICT Judge Louis Guirola, Jr. Therefore,
as a matter of law, the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Civil Lawsuit is STILL
ACTIVE and VIABLE regardless of the DECEPTIVE APPEARANCE of the
Docket Sheet reflecting "CLOSED!" Moreover, there is EVIDENCE to support
that Newsome submitted her 01/17/14 pleading entitled, “Objection(s) To
January 3, 2014 Order Sanctioning Plaintiff and Preventing Plaintiff From
Filing Additional Pleadings Unless Granted Prior Approval From A Judge Of
This Court and DEMAND For JURY TRIAL” which to DATE (06/17/16) has
NOT been filed!
D) DOCKET SHEET MISREPRESENTATION OF CLOSED CASE:
Please see the FIFTH CIRCUIT Court of Appeals’ decision in, Dillon v. State of Mississippi
Military Department, 23 F.3d 915; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14578 at EXHIBIT “__” and
is incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full herein and which states in part:
The United States asserts correctly that, because there was no final judgment,
appellate jurisdiction is lacking. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) 3
; e.g., Thompson v.
Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1245 (5th Cir. 1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1291) [HN3]
(absent Rule 54(b) designation, "a partial disposition of a multi-claim or multi-
party action does not qualify as a final decision . . . and is ordinarily an
unappealable interlocutory order") (internal citations and quotations omitted),
cited in Kelly, 908 F.2d at 1220. Ordinarily, a judgment is not final for purposes
of appeal unless it "ends [**5] the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing
for the court to do but execute the judgment." Way v. Reliance Ins. Co., 815
F.2d 1033 (5th Cir. 1987) (citing cases; internal quotation marks and citation
27. Page 25 of 63
omitted) (judgment finding defendant liable, but not awarding damages pending
arbitration, was not a final order for purposes of § 1291). . .
Most surprisingly (read amazingly), plaintiffs did not file a reply brief in
response to the government's jurisdictional point. . .
4 Needless to say, a reply brief responding to this
contention should have been filed. This is a classic instance
for when such a brief is called for -- to respond to a new point
raised by an appellee. And, where, as here, the point
concerns jurisdiction, the call for the reply is all the
louder; the need, all the greater.
5 Although the district court dismissed only the United States,
the docket sheet states that the case has been "closed",
despite a later motion to dismiss by the state defendants
(apparently not ruled upon). . . .
Because there has not been a final judgment, under Rule 54(b) or otherwise,
we lack jurisdiction.
50. On or about 09/30/15 this Bankruptcy Court attempted to MISLEAD Creditor
Newsome in its filing of a Final Judgment in this NON-Core Bankruptcy action;
however, Newsome did NOT bite and CONTESTED the Final Judgment. See
DOCKET No. 64.
51. While this Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington asserts Creditor
Newsome’s BELABORS the JURISDICTIONAL issue, Newsome takes such
FRIVOLOUS attacks as EVIDENCE that, “the CALL for REPLY is
all the LOUDER” and, “the NEED, all the GREATER” has been
SUSTAINED!
52. While the Record EVIDENCE in this instant Bankruptcy matter WILL SUPPORT that
the DOCKET alleges that this case is CLOSED - - FAR FROM IT! Creditor
Newsome will NOT be BULLIED, THREATENED, COERCED, etc. into
WAIVING Rights secured/guaranteed under the Constitution and other statutes/laws
governing said matters.
53. While the Record EVIDENCE in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT –
Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No. 10-704 - WILL SUPPORT that
the DOCKET alleges that this case is CLOSED - - FAR FROM IT!
28. Page 26 of 63
Plaintiff Newsome will NOT be BULLIED, THREATENED, COERCED, etc. into
WAIVING Rights secured/guaranteed under the Constitution and other statutes/laws
governing said matters.
54. There is EVIDENCE to support that in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
action in Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt & Sams, et al., that on or about 01/17/14,
Plaintiff Newsome submitted for filing, “Plaintiff’s Objection(s) To January 3, 2014
Order Sanctioning Plaintiff And Preventing Plaintiff From Filing Additional Pleading
Unless Granted Prior Approval From A Judge Of This Court and DEMAND FOR
JURY TRIAL!”
29. Page 27 of 63
FACT: Plaintiff Newsome PAID the $350 Filing
Fee and at the TIME of filing her Complaint
PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY NOTIFIED the
District Court of her DEMAND for a JURY
TRIAL!
55. This Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington has ERRED
in trying to BULLY Creditor Newsome into filing an Appeal. NO
Final Judgment has been entered.
30. Page 28 of 63
56. This Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington has ERRED and IS
ENGAGING in CRIMINAL acts in efforts of EMBEZZLING monies (masked as
FILING Fee) from Creditor Newsome and for purposes of
UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY infringing upon the Constitutional Rights and other
Rights secured/guaranteed under the statutes/laws governing said matters.
E) FILING OF OBJECTION(S): Please see Flores v. United States Attorney General,
2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90513 which states in part:
The parties are warned that any such objections are required to be in
writing and must be filed within fourteen (14) days of this date. Failure to
timely file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions and
recommendations contained in this report will bar an aggrieved party,
except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal unobjected-
to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district
court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th
Cir. 1996).
57. The Record EVIDENCE (not ONLY in this instant Bankruptcy action brought by
Debtor Townsend) will SUPPORT that Creditor Newsome has TIMELY submitted her
OBJECTIONS in accordance with the statutes/laws governing said matters; moreover,
has done SO in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT – Southern District of
Mississippi (Jackson) – Case No. 10-704 for purposes of PRESERVING
PROTECTED rights as well as the PRESERVATION of the ISSUES and the
EVIDENCE provided to sustain her claims and/or defenses.
58. This instant filing will also SUPPORT and SUSTAIN Creditor Newsome’s
OBJECTION(s) to the 06/07/16 Order Denying Motion To Reopen Case. . . (DOCKET
No. 78) in this instant Bankruptcy action! Thus, PRESERVING Creditor Newsome’s
ISSUES as well as the DEFENSES that this Court and Opposing Counsel/Debtor
Townsend have FAILED to REBUT!
F) DEPRIVATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS: Please see
Kenyatta v. Moore, 623 F. Supp. 224; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13701 at EXHIBIT “C”
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
OVERVIEW: The debtor contended that 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(b)(2)(C)
expressly granted the bankruptcy court jurisdiction over the debtor's
counterclaim to the creditor's claim, but the creditor argued that the
counterclaim was not within core bankruptcy jurisdiction and was excluded
as a personal injury claim. The U.S. Supreme Court held that, although the
bankruptcy court had the statutory authority to enter judgment on the core
counterclaim, it lacked the constitutional counterclaim by the debtor, the
bankruptcy court was not established under U.S. Const. art. III and was not
subject to the constitutional assurances of independence which would allow
adjudication of the debtor's state common law claim. Further, resolving the
creditor's claim would not necessarily resolve the debtor's counterclaim, and the
debtor's claim was otherwise unrelated to the claim-allowance process. Also, the
debtor's claim did not involve public rights to allow the congressional extension
of bankruptcy jurisdiction, since the debtor's claim flowed from state law rather
31. Page 29 of 63
than the federal bankruptcy scheme authority to do so under U.S. Const. art.
III. While § 157 purported to extend bankruptcy jurisdiction to any.
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals
that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction to enter the judgment.
[HN3] A federal employee who uses his office to commit a federal
constitutional violation should not be allowed to claim that office as
grounds for an absolute immunity defense. In conspiring to commit such
constitutional violation with racially discriminatory animus, such federal
official is a "person" within the meaning of 42 U.S.C.S. § 1985(3).
[HN4] By its specific terms, 42 U.S.C.S. § 1985(3) proscribes any conspiracy
which has the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person
or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges
and immunities under the laws.
[HN5] The source of the congressional power to create a cause of action for
private conspiracies does not rest in the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal
Protection Clause, as does the cause of action created in 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983
for deprivation of constitutional rights under color of state law; rather, the
power to reach private conspiracies under § 1985(3) emanates from the
Thirteenth Amendment. Congress has the power under the Thirteenth
Amendment "to determine what are the badges and incidents of slavery, and
the authority to translate that determination into effective legislation,"
[HN7] 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 provides that every person who, under color of any
statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the
District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the
United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at
law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. For the purposes of
this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of
Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
[HN8] 42 U.S.C.S. § 1985(3) applies to private conspiracies engaged in by
federal officials.
[HN9] An individual defendant, regardless of the nature of his employment
or official status, who acts with invidious, class-based discriminatory
animus and conspires with one or more defendants to deprive another of
clearly established constitutional rights can be held liable for money
damages under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1985(3).
[**6] Defendants' instant motion seeks partial judgment on the pleadings on
the ground that persons acting under color of federal law are not within the reach
of § 1985(3). In a well-stated brief, defendants submit a three-fold argument for
precluding the availability of a § 1985(3) cause of action in this case: (1) the
legislative intent behind the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, § 2 of
which is the parent of § 1985(3), was to curb Ku Klux Klan activities in the
Reconstruction South and indeed to protect federal officials, and thus
conspiracies by federal officials are not covered by the Act; (2) the concept of
equal protection of the laws and equal privileges and immunities under the laws
in § 1985(3) necessarily contemplates some involvement by a state or by one
acting under color of its authority before a violation can be established; (3)
decisional law in the Fifth Circuit indicates that a § 1985(3) cause of action is
32. Page 30 of 63
subject to the same state-action requirement that exists in an action under 42
U.S.C. § 1983, and therefore federal officials acting under color of federal law
cannot be held liable under § 1985(3). For the reasons stated hereinafter, this
court declines [**7] to give identical construction to the legislative intent
behind § 1983 and § 1985(3), and concludes that federal officials can be held
individually liable for engaging in a private conspiracy to deprive a person
of equal protection of the laws.
Defendants correctly contend that the "central concern" of the 42d Congress in
passing the Civil Rights Act of 1871 was to combat the "violent and other
efforts of the Klan and its allies to resist and to frustrate the intended affects
[sic] of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments . . ." Carpenters v.
Scott, 463 U.S. 825, 837, 103 S. Ct. 3352, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1049 (1983). A principal
purpose underlying the legislation was to provide, through a private damages
remedy, some protection for blacks, union sympathizers and federal officials at
work in the Reconstruction South. Carpenters v. Scott, 463 U.S. at 837; Griffin
v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88, 100-03, 91 S. Ct. 1790, 29 L. Ed. 2d 338 (1971);
McCord v. Bailey, 204 U.S. App. D.C. 334, 636 F.2d 606, 615-16 (D.C. Cir.
1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 983, 68 L. Ed. 2d 839, 101 S. Ct. 2314 (1981).
Defendants argue that it would have been [**8] "anomalous" for the 42d
Congress to have included within the same legislation having the purpose of
protecting federal institutions a section imposing liability on those charged
with carrying out that difficult purpose and for whose protection the
legislation was passed. . .
[HN3] A federal employee who uses his office to commit [**9] a federal
constitutional violation should not be allowed to claim that office as
grounds for an absolute immunity defense. See Bivens, 403 U.S. 388, 29 L.
Ed. 2d 619, 91 S. Ct. 1999; Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 52 L. Ed. 714, 28
S. Ct. 441 (1908). In conspiring to commit such constitutional violation with
racially discriminatory animus, such federal official is a "person" within
the meaning of § 1985(3). See Hobson v. Wilson, 237 U.S. App. D.C. 219, 737
F.2d 1, 20 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Waller v. Butkovich, 584 F. Supp. 909, 939 (M.D.
N.C. 1984).
Given the broad language of § 1985(3) and the construction of that language in
Griffin to cover private conspiracies, this court rejects defendants' contention
that federal officials are not "persons" within the meaning of the statute
simply because their safety was of some concern to the 42d Congress. Indeed,
the major concern of the 42d Congress in promulgating what is now § 1985(3) --
to provide "a statutory cause of action for negro citizens who have been the
victims of conspiratorial, racially discriminatory private action aimed at
depriving them of the basic rights that the law secures to all free men."
Griffin [**10] , 403 U.S. at 105 -- would be thwarted by such a holding.
Therefore, the court concludes that there is nothing in the legislative history of §
1985(3) that would exclude conspiratorial private action by federal employees
from its coverage. . . .
Second, [HN5] the source of the congressional power to create a cause of action
for private conspiracies does not rest in the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal
Protection Clause, as does the cause of action created in § 1983 for deprivation
of constitutional rights under color of state law; rather, the power [**12] to
reach private conspiracies under § 1985(3) emanates from the Thirteenth
Amendment. Griffin, 403 U.S. at 104-105. Congress has the power under the
Thirteenth Amendment "to determine what are the badges and incidents of
slavery, and the authority to translate that determination into effective
legislation," Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409, 440, 20 L. Ed. 2d
33. Page 31 of 63
1189, 88 S. Ct. 2186 (1968), without regard to the existence vel non of state
action. Federal officials are certainly as capable as state officials of violating
the mandates of the Thirteenth Amendment. . .
The better reasoned view has been adopted in a number of recent cases in which
§ 1985(3) has been applied to private conspiracies by federal officials. 9
Two
of these cases, Hobson v. Wilson, 237 U.S. App. D.C. 219, 737 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir.
1984), and Hampton v. Hanrahan, 600 F.2d 600 (7th Cir. 1979), involved suits
against F.B.I. agents under § 1985(3) for engaging in private conspiracies
pursuant to the same F.B.I. COINTELPRO-Black Nationalist program at
issue in this suit. In both cases, the courts of appeals held that the respective
plaintiffs had stated cognizable causes of action against the individual F.B.I.
agents under § 1985(3). Hobson, 737 F.2d at 20; Hampton, 600 F.2d at 623. . .
The court is therefore of the opinion that the clear weight of recent authority on
this issue is to the effect that [HN8] § 1985(3) applies to private conspiracies
engaged in by federal officials, including those acting to further the stated
objectives of the F.B.I. . . .
In conclusion, the court holds that [HN9] an individual defendant, regardless
of the nature of his employment or official status, who acts with invidious,
class-based discriminatory animus and conspires with one or more
defendants to deprive another of clearly established constitutional rights
can be held liable for money damages under § 1985(3). Kenyatta's amended
complaint sufficiently sets out the elements of a cause of action under § 1985(3)
to allow this case to go forward to trial.
59. Creditor Newsome asserts that in this instant Bankruptcy action, this Court and/or
Judge Edward Ellington LACKS the Constitutional authority to enter a Final Judgment;
moreover, that said Court is NOT established under U.S. Const. Art. III and is NOT
subject to the Constitutional assurances of independence which would allow for Debtor
Townsend’s claims to be discharged from LIABILITY sought through Newsome’s
CIVIL Lawsuit.
60. This Bankruptcy Court LACKS JURISDICTION to enter a Final Judgment.
61. Creditor Newsome does NOT consent to this Bankruptcy Court’s adjudication of
Debtor Townsend’s claims and, as a matter of law, this Court is REQUIRED to submit
Townsend’s Bankruptcy action to the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT –
Southern District of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No. 10-704.
62. It appears that in this instant Bankruptcy action that Judge Edward Ellington and his
LAW CLERK are KNOWINGLY engaging in CRIMINAL acts because they may
believe that Judge Ellington is IMMUNED from LIABILITY. However, NEITHER
Judge Ellington NOR his Law Clerk are IMMUNED from CRIMINAL
PROSECUTION for the ROLES being played in furtherance of the CONSPIRACIES
and other CRIMES leveled against Creditor Newsome that are being ADDRESSED in
her DISTRICT COURT action (Case No. 10-704).
63. It appears that the CONSPIRACIES that this Court’s Judge Edward Ellington and his
Law Clerk are engaging in IS WITH Racially Discriminatory ANIMUS, and, thus, are
WITHIN the boundaries of claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3).
34. Page 32 of 63
64. The record evidence will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court’s Judge Edward
Ellington and his Law Clerk ARE ENGAGING in Conspiracies within 42 U.S.C. §
1985(3) for the PURPOSE of DEPRIVING Creditor Newsome of the EQUAL
PROTECTION of the laws and/or DEPRIVING Newsome EQUAL PRIVILEGES and
IMMUNITIES under the laws.
65. The Record EVIDENCE will support that this Bankruptcy Court’s Judge Edward
Ellington and his Law Clerk are ENGAGING in PRIVATE Conspiracies leveled
AGAINST Creditor Newsome.
66. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court’s Judge Edward
Ellington and his Law Clerk (regardless of the nature of their employment and/or
official status) ARE ACTING with INVIDIOUS, CLASS-BASED Discriminatory
ANIMUS and IS CONSPIRING with ONE or MORE persons to DEPRIVE Creditor
Newsome of ESTABLISHED Constitutional Rights and, therefore, both Judge
Ellington and his Law Clerk may be held LIABLE for the ROLE(s) played in
CONSPIRACIES and the IRREPARABLE injury/harm done to Newsome.
67. The Record Evidence will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward
Ellington has been TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY placed on NOTICE of
the role that the KLAN’S Law Firm Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz
(“Baker Donelson”) is playing in the CONSPIRACIES leveled against Creditor
Newsome. Moreover, HOW such Law Firms as Baker Donelson use FRONTING
Firms to CONCEAL their IDENTITY as well as efforts to CIRCUMVENT laws as
the KU KLUX KLAN Act! The Klan’s Law Firm of Baker Donelson is ALIVE and is
in BAD SHAPE while it DESPERATELY SEEKS MEMBERS in 2016, and Creditor
Newsome is HERE TO EXPOSE! - - NO PATTY CAKE PLAYING! The Klan’s
TERRORIST Law Firm Baker Donelson and its COHORTS are on their way DOWN!
Creditor Newsome is MORE THAN HAPPY to LEAD THE CHARGE!
35. Page 33 of 63
G) IMMUNITY ISSUE: Please see U.S. District Court – Southern District of Mississippi
(Hattiesburg), Hudson v. Jones County, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12237 at EXHIBIT “D”
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein which states
in part:
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
The Fifth Circuit has held that "government officials performing discretionary
functions are protected from civil liability under the doctrine of qualified
immunity if their conduct violates no 'clearly established statutory or
constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.'"
Sorenson v. Ferrie, 134 F.3d 325, 327 (5th Cir. 1998)(quoting Harlow v.
Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S. Ct. 2727, 2738, 73 L. Ed. 2d 396 (1982)).
Under the two step analysis employed by the Fifth Circuit in reviewing claims
wherein qualified immunity has been asserted, the Court must first determine
"whether the plaintiff has asserted the violation of a clearly established
constitutional right. If so, the court decides whether the defendant's conduct was
objectively reasonable." Sorenson, 134 F.3d at 327 quoting Coleman v. Houston
Indep. Sch. Dist., 113 F.3d 528, 533 (5th Cir. 1997)(applying the two-prong test
of Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 231-32, 111 S. Ct. 1789, 1792-93, 114 L. Ed.
2d 277 (1991)). The first step "is subdivided into three questions: (1) whether a
constitutional violation is alleged; (2) whether the law regarding the alleged
violation was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation; and (3)
whether the record shows that a violation occurred." Dudley v. Angel, 209 F.3d
460, 462 quoting Kerr v.Lyford, 171 F.3d 330, 339 (5th Cir. 1999) citing Rich v.
Dollar, 841 F.2d 1558, 1563 (11th Cir. 1988)).
In this case, the court finds that Hudson cannot demonstrate he has suffered a
constitutional deprivation and, as such, his claims against Gavin must be
dismissed.
I. DUE PROCESS
To state a claim for a due process violation, Hudson must establish a
"recognized ,,liberty or property. interest within the purview of the
Fourteenth Amendment, and that he was intentionally or recklessly
deprived of that interest, even temporarily, under color of state law.'"
Griffith v. Johnston, 899 F.2d 1427, 1435 (5th Cir. 1990). The procedural
[*10] component of the Due Process Clause makes certain that citizens
receive fair process i.e. notice and an opportunity to respond, when deprived
of a protected liberty interest. Finch v. Fort Bend Indep. Sch. Dist., 333 F.3d
555, 562 (5th Cir. 2003). The substantive due process "bars certain arbitrary,
wrongful government actions ,,regardless of the fairness of the procedures
used to implement them." Marco Outdoor Adver., Inc. v. Reg'l Transit Auth.,
489 F.3d 669, 673 (5th Cir.. 2007) (quoting, Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113,
125, 110 S. Ct. 975, 108 L. Ed. 2d 100 (1990)). Substantive due process is
violated by state conduct that "shocks the conscience." McClendon v. City of
Columbia, 305 F.3d 314, 326 (5th Cir. 2002).
Thus, in order to prove a due process violation, Hudson must first show that he
has a "recognized liberty or property interest within the purview of the
Fourteenth Amendment." Doe v. Taylor Indep. Sch. Dist., 15 F.3d 443, 450
(5th Cir. 1995).
36. Page 34 of 63
68. The Record EVIDENCE will support that this Bankruptcy Court’s Judge Edward
Ellington will NOT qualify for IMMUNITY because he is KNOWINGLY and
WILLINGLY engaging in criminal acts that VIOLATE clearly established
STATUTORY and/or CONSTITUTIONAL Rights of which a REASONABLE person
would have known; moreover, VIOLATIONS that have been BEAUTIFULLY set
further pursuant to Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
CONSTITUTIONAL violations ARE alleged!
69. Pursuant to Rule 8 (General Rules of Pleading) of the FRCP, Creditor Newsome’s
pleadings in this instant Bankruptcy action specifically sets forth “short and plain
statement(s)” of the grounds for relief/claims; however, due to this Court’s/Judge
Edward Ellington’s INABILITY to respond in accordance to said Rule to
legally/lawfully REBUT the claims, allegations
and/or arguments set forth in Creditor Newsome’s
pleadings, this Court/Judge Ellington merely
CONTINUALLY proceeds on what appears to be
a MENTALLY DISTURBED and RABID
Judge/Law Clerk THROWING TOGETHER a
FRIVOLOUS and BASELESS 8-PAGE rambling
of UNSUBSTANTIATED GARBAGE! Further
supporting and challenging Judge Edward
Ellington’s FITNESS as well as
MENTAL/PSYCHOLOGICAL state to preside in
this matter; moreover, his INABILITY to
understand and interpret the facts, evidence and legal conclusions provided in Creditor
Newsome’s pleadings providing in this Bankruptcy action.
70. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that Creditor Newsome has CLEARLY
ASSERTED VIOLATION(s) of CLEARLY ESTABLISHED Constitutional Right(s)
and that this Court’s Judge Ellington’s CONDUCT is UNREASONABLE and done
with MALICE, PREJUDICE and INCORPORATES a Racially Discriminatory
Animus!
71. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that in this instant Bankruptcy action, the
LAWS SUPPORTING Creditor Newsome’s claims have been REPEATEDLY set forth
at the time of VIOLATIONS for purposes of TIMELY, PROPERLY and
ADEQUATELY putting this Court, Judge Edward Ellington, his Law Clerk,
OPPOSING Party (Debtor Townsend and her Counsel) and their CO-
CONSPIRATORS on NOTICE of the CONSTITUTIONAL violations as well as
Criminal/Civil violations being committed. To NO AVAIL!
72. The Record EVIDENCE in this Bankruptcy action WILL SUSTAIN the SHOWING of
VIOLATION(s) of and AGAINST Creditor Newsome from Judge Edward Ellington
and those with whom he CONSPIRES!
73. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAN that in this instant Bankruptcy action, that this
Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington has REPEATEDLY VIOLATED and
DEPRIVED Creditor Newsome of DUE PROCESS and the DEPRIVATION of
LIBERTIES set forth in this instant “CVNOT06/07/16ORDER” as well as PREVIOUS
filings from Creditor Newsome. Moreover, that the VIOLATIONS of this Bankruptcy
Court and/or Judge Ellington are DONE INTENTIONALLY and with RECKLESS
DISREGARD for Creditor Newsome’s Rights secured/guaranteed under the
Constitution and other statutes/laws governing said matters.
37. Page 35 of 63
74. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge
Edward Ellington ERRED and is attempting to BULLY Creditor Newsome to forego
PROTECTED Rights by noting for instance, “Vogel Newsome is PROHIBITED from
FILING ANOTHER pleading in this case OTHER than a NOTICE OF APPEAL which
is ACCOMPANIED by the RELATED FILING FEE” – i.e. SUSTAINING the
UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL practices of this Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Ellington to
DEPRIVE Creditor Newsome DUE PROCESS and an OPPORTUNITY to RESPOND
to his FRIVOLOUS 06/07/16 Order Denying Motion To Reopen Case. . . (DOCKET
No. 78).
75. Due Process BARS the ARBITRARY and WRONGFUL Government actions of this
Bankruptcy Court and Judge Edward Ellington. Moreover, the
UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL procedures that are being used to DEPRIVE Creditor
Newsome DUE PROCESS!
76. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court and Judge Edward
Ellington Due Process VIOLATION(s) INDEED “SHOCKS the CONSCIENCE!”
H) DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW/DENIAL OF THE EQUAL
PROTECTION OF THE LAW: Please see U.S. Southern District of Mississippi,
Wickton v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 45 F.2d 615; 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1528 which
states in part:
"That a legislative presumption of one fact from evidence of another may
not constitute a denial of due process of law or a denial of the equal
protection of the law, it is only essential that there shall be some
rational connection between the fact proved and the ultimate fact
presumed, and that the inference of one fact from proof of another shall
not be so unreasonable as to be a purely arbitrary mandate. So, also, it
must not, under guise of regulating the presentation of evidence, operate
to preclude the party from the right to present his defense to the
main fact thus presumed.
"If a legislative provision not unreasonable in itself, prescribing a rule of
evidence, in either criminal or civil cases, does not shut out from the
party affected a reasonable opportunity to submit to the jury in his
defense all of the facts bearing upon the issue, there is no ground for
holding that due process of law has been denied him.
77. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN a NEXUS as well as a RATIONAL
CONNECTION BETWEEN the Fact(s) PROVED and the Ultimate Fact(s)
PRESUMED through this instant Bankruptcy filing as well as PREVIOUS filings in
this action that Creditor Vogel Newsome has been DEPRIVED/DENIED Due Process
of Law as well as DEPRIVED/DENIED the Equal Protection of the Laws!
78. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that Creditor Newsome has TIMELY,
PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY NOTIFIED this Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge
Edward Ellington of her DEMAND for a JURY TRIAL! To NO AVAIL!
This Bankruptcy Court and Judge Ellington are DETERMINED to DEPRIVE
Creditor Newsome of DUE PROCESS of Law and EQUAL PROTECTION of the
38. Page 36 of 63
Laws in FULFILLING ROLE(s) in the CONSPIRACIES leveled against Creditor
Newsome!
I) CORE PROCEEDINGS: Please see the FIFTH Circuits decision in, In The Matter of
Timothy Michael Frazin, 732 F.3d 313; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20032 at EXHIBIT “E”
attached hereto and incorporated by reference which states in part:
[HN6] Hudson's holding, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, that bankruptcy courts can enter final judgments in all core proceedings
is clearly inconsistent with the United States Supreme Court's Stern's holding that
bankruptcy courts cannot enter final judgments in one type of core
proceeding, namely, state-law counterclaims that are not necessarily resolved in
the claims-allowance process. Therefore, Stern has unequivocally sub silentio
overruled Hudson as to that type of core proceeding. . .
[HN7] When separation of powers is implicated in a given case, the parties
cannot by consent cure the constitutional difficulty. When such U.S. Const. art.
III limitations are at issue, notions of consent and waiver cannot be dispositive
because the limitations serve institutional interests that the parties cannot be
expected to protect.
[HN8] The practice of bankruptcy courts entering final judgments in certain
state-law counterclaims compromises the integrity of the system of separated
powers and the role of the Judiciary in that system. Thus, structural concerns
cannot be ameliorated by a party's consent or waiver to the bankruptcy court's
jurisdiction.
[HN14] In order to preserve an argument for appeal, the litigant must press and
not merely intimate the argument during the proceedings before the district court.
If an argument is not raised to such a degree that the district court has an
opportunity to rule on it, the appellate court will not address it on appeal.
79. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that this instant Bankruptcy action is NOT a
Core proceeding!
80. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that Creditor Newsome does NOT CONSENT
to this Bankruptcy Court presiding over Debtor Lady M. Townsend Bankruptcy action
which has named Newsome as a CREDITOR!
81. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that Creditor Newsome has TIMELY,
PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY CONTESTED the FRIVOLOUS/VOID
Discharge of Debt granted to Debtor Townsend! Furthermore, this Bankruptcy Court
and/or Judge Edward Ellington ERRED in the ENTRY of Discharge of Debt because it
FALSELY and INTENTIONALLY MISREPRESENTS that Debtor Townsend is
DISCHARGED from LIABILITY and DAMAGES in the Civil Lawsuit brought by
Creditor Newsome in Newsome v. Mitchell McNutt & Sams, et al., in the UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT – Southern District Of Mississippi (Jackson), Case No.
10-704 – when Debtor Townsend is NOT Discharged as a matter of statutes/laws
governing said matters.
39. Page 37 of 63
J) NON-CORE PROCEEDING: Please see the FIFTH Circuit Court decision in, In
the Matter of BP RE, L.P. v. RML Waxahachie Dodge, LLC, 735 F.3d 279; 2013 U.S. App.
LEXIS 22791 at EXHIBIT “F” attached hereto and incorporated by reference with
states in part:
OVERVIEW: HOLDINGS: [1]-Where a debtor filed an adversary complaint
alleging various state law tort and contract claims against creditors, the
bankruptcy court lacked U.S. Const. art. III authority to enter final
judgment denying relief on the debtor's claims because the proceedings
were non-core proceedings that were not necessary to the resolution of
the bankruptcy estate; [2]-Although the debtor initially consented to the
bankruptcy court's entry of final judgment, but later withdrew its consent
such that the bankruptcy court was statutorily authorized under 28 U.S.C.S.
§ 157(c)(2) to issue a final judgment, the debtor's consent did not cure the
constitutional deficiency because parties could not consent to such
circumvention of art. III that impinged on the structural interests of the
Judicial Branch.
OUTCOME: Judgment vacated and case remanded.
[HN2] . . . For non-core proceedings, the bankruptcy court submits
proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court,
which then reviews the submissions de novo. 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(c)(1). With
consent of the parties, however, the bankruptcy court may enter final,
appealable judgments in non-core proceedings. 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(c)(2).
[HN5] In Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011), the U.S. Supreme Court
determined that a bankruptcy court lacked the constitutional authority to
enter final judgment on a debtor's state-law counterclaim even though the
statute conferred such authority.
[HN6] Courts emphasize the importance of our tripartite system and
separation of powers, stressing that the system of checks and balances
exists to serve two related purposes: to protect the independence of each
branch and to protect the individual citizen. . .
[HN7] When a suit is made of the stuff of the traditional actions at common
law tried by the courts at Westminster in 1789, and is brought within the
bounds of federal jurisdiction, the responsibility for deciding that suit rests
with U.S. Const. art. III judges in art. III courts. The Constitution assigns that
job--resolution of the mundane as well as the glamorous, matters of common
law and statute as well as constitutional law, issues of fact as well as issues of
law--to the Judiciary.
[HN9] Non-core proceedings usually require a bankruptcy court to enter
findings and conclusions for the district court to review. 28 U.S.C.S. §
157(c)(1). But, with the consent of the parties, a district court may refer a
case to the bankruptcy court to hear and determine and to enter appropriate
orders and judgments. 28 U.S.C.S. § 157(c)(2).
[HN11] The consequences of a litigant sandbagging the court--remaining
silent about his objection and belatedly raising the error only if the case
does not conclude in his favor--can be particularly severe.
40. Page 38 of 63
[HN12] Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011), held that, regardless of
statutory authority, a bankruptcy court does not have the constitutional
authority to enter a final judgment on claims that are so deeply at the heart of
the federal judiciary's U.S. Const. art. III powers and are not necessary to the
resolution of the bankruptcy estate.
[HN15] . . . However, by failing to object until a case reaches a U.S. Court
of Appeals, an appellant consents to the adjudication of the claim by a
bankruptcy judge.
[HN16] Parties cannot consent to circumvention of U.S. Const. art. III that
impinges on the structural interests of the Judicial Branch.
[HN21] Where a structural interest is triggered, the parties cannot by consent
cure the constitutional difficulty for the same reason that the parties by
consent cannot confer on federal courts subject-matter jurisdiction beyond the
limitations imposed by U.S. Const. art. III, § 2. When the art. III limitations
are at issue, notions of consent and waiver cannot be dispositive because the
limitations serve institutional interests that the parties cannot be expected to
protect.
[HN22] Under Stern, a bankruptcy court lacks constitutional authority to
enter final judgment on certain state-law counterclaims by a debtor, despite
that the debtor has impliedly consented to the bankruptcy court's
jurisdiction.
[HN23] Although a district court does have the authority to retain jurisdiction,
a bankruptcy court lacks constitutional authority to enter a final judgment if
the district court does not retain and the reference is not withdrawn. And
once entered, a purported judgment of the bankruptcy court -- the entry of a
final, binding judgment by a court with broad substantive jurisdiction -- would
be entitled to the usual deference, for example, the clearly-erroneous standard
for factual findings, owed to such an act that is final, subject to review only if
a party chooses to appeal, to a higher, U.S. Const. art. III tribunal.
Matter of Wood, 825 F.2d 90 (5th
Cir. Miss. 1987) - If proceeding
involves right created by federal bankruptcy law, or is one which would
only arise in bankruptcy, it is core proceeding, but if proceeding does
not invoke substantive right created by federal bankruptcy law and is
one that could exist outside of bankruptcy, it is noncore proceeding,
though it may be related to bankruptcy because of its potential effect
on debtor's estate. 28 U.S.C.A. § 157.
In re OCA, Inc., 551 F.3d 359 (5th
Cir. 2008) - Bankruptcy court's
adjudicative authority is constrained if the adversary proceeding is non-
core.
82. This instant Bankruptcy action brought by Debtor Ladye M.
Townsend is a NON-Core proceeding!
83. This Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington ERRED in the ENTRY of a
FRIVOLOUS Final Judgment on or about 09/30/15, in which said Court LACKED
Jurisdiction to enter!
41. Page 39 of 63
84. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN this Bankruptcy Court’s and/or Judge Edward
Ellington’s KNOWLEDGE that this instant Bankruptcy action is NON-Core and, thus,
the TRUE reason that Judge Ellington this time ONLY submitted the 06/07/15
Findings Of Fact (which is hereby TIMELY CONTESTED) because of the NON-Core
status!
85. Bankruptcy courts have NO power to ENTER judgments in NON-Core matters. - In re
Cathedral of Incarnation in Diocese of Long Island, 99 F.3d 66 (1996)
(a) IF this Bankruptcy Court had Jurisdiction (which it does NOT) it would have
ONLY required a “PROPOSED Findings of Fact” or “REPORT and
RECOMMENDATION” for submittal to DISTRICT COURT! However,
instead, this Court MISTAKENLY submitted “Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law on Creditor’s (Vogel Newsome) Motion For Relief From
Order/Judgement (sic); Motion For Rule 11 Sanctions Of And Against Robert
Rex McRaney Jr./McRaney & McRaney; and Request To be Advised Of
Conflict-Of-Interests (DKT. #34)” – See DOCKET No. 60 - which clearly is
neither “PROPOSED” or a “REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION” in
Bankruptcy matters (as in this instant action) which is a NON-CORE
proceeding – i.e. as evidenced in this instant filing as well as Creditor
Newsome’s previous filings in this Bankruptcy matter.
42. Page 40 of 63
28 USC § 157(c) as of 10/08/15: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/157
(b) This Bankruptcy Court’s Judge Edward Ellington MISTAKENLY moved and
QUICKLY entered “FINAL JUDGMENT ON CREDITOR’S (VOGEL
NEWSOME) MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER/JUDGEMENT (sic);
MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS OF AND AGAINST ROBERT REX
McRANEY JR./McRANEY & McRANEY; AND REQUEST TO BE
ADVISED OF CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS (DOCKET No. 61)” in a NON-
CORE proceeding WITHOUT the Consent of Creditor Newsome! Action
which is CLEARLY in VIOLATION of the statutes/laws governing said
matters and DEPRIVES Creditor Newsome of RIGHTS GUARANTEED under
the Constitution and other governing statutes/laws.
Phrase “final judgments and orders,” as used in statute that
AUTHORIZES bankruptcy courts to enter final judgments and
orders in NON-core proceedings ONLY WITH consent of parties, is
not limited in scope merely to ultimate rulings entered following
evidentiary hearing but also includes rulings upon dispositive motions
that present only questions of law; UNLESS parties CONSENT to
some different procedure, whenever bankruptcy court reaches
conclusion with respect to dispositive motion in NON-core
proceeding, it MUST prepare REPORT and RECOMMENDATION
for SUBMISSION to district court, REQUESTING entry of final
order thereon. – In re Blakwell ex rel. Estate of I.G. Services Ltd.,
279 B.R. 818 (2002)
43. Page 41 of 63
(c) Having KNOWLEDGE that this instant Bankruptcy matter is a NON-CORE
proceeding. Therefore, this Bankruptcy Court LACKED jurisdiction to
render the “Findings of Fact. . .” – DOCKET NO. 60 and then SWIFTLY
moved ILLEGALLY and UNLAWFULLY to enter its FINAL JUDGMENT –
DOCKET NO. 61.
To decide whether particular matter falls within its
bankruptcy jurisdiction, it is NOT necessary for DISTRICT court to
distinguish between “arising under,” “arising in,” or “related to”
proceedings; DISTRICT court NEED ONLY determine whether
the matter is at least “related to” bankruptcy. – Beasley v. Personal
Finance Corporation, 279 B.R. 523 (S.D. Miss. 2002) – Dixon v.
First Family Financial Services, 276 B.R. 173 (S.D. Miss. 2002)
For purpose of determining whether particular matter falls
within DISTRICT court’s bankruptcy jurisdiction, it is NOT
necessary to distinguish between proceedings “arising under,”
“arising in a case under,” or “related to a case under” Title 11; these
REFERENCES operate CONJUNCTIVELY to define scope of
court’s jurisdiction. 28 USCA § 1334 – Thomas v. R.J. Reynolds
Tobacco Co., 259 B.R. 571 (S.D. Miss. 2001)
The 1984 Bankruptcy Act did NOT change scope of
bankruptcy jurisdiction set forth in 1978 Act, but rather altered
PLACEMENT of bankruptcy jurisdiction by creating statutory
distinction between core and NON-core proceedings and
RESTRICTING power of BANKRUPTCY court to adjudicate the
latter. . . . 28 USCA § 1334 – Matter of Wood, 825 F.2d 90, on
remand 84 B.R. 432 (5th
Cir. (Miss) 1987) – If proceeding involves
right created by federal bankruptcy law, or is one which would only
arise in bankruptcy, it IS core proceeding, but IF proceeding does
NOT invoke substantive right created by federal bankruptcy law and
is one that could EXIST OUTSIDE of bankruptcy, it is NONcore
proceeding, though it may BE RELATED to bankruptcy because of its
potential effect on debtor’s estate. (Id.)
86. As a matter of law, the United States District Court – Southern District of Mississippi
(Jackson Division), Case No. 10-704 - on December 3, 2010, FIRST retained
jurisdiction over this matter.
Jurisdiction is the power to decide; it must be conferred, not
assumed. Matter of Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co., 794 F.2d
1182 (7th
Cir. 1986). All bankruptcy jurisdiction is given in the first
instance to the United States district courts. Acolyte Elec. Corp. v.
City of New York, 69 B.R. 155 (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. 1986), ordered aff’d,
1987 1987 WL 47763 (E.D. N.Y. 1987); In re Double TRL, Inc., 65
B.R. 993 (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. 1986).
The district courts are granted jurisdiction over bankruptcy
cases, that is cases under the Bankruptcy Code and over three
categories of bankruptcy proceedings: (1) civil proceedings arising
under Title 11; (2) civil proceedings arising in a case under Title 11;
and (3) civil proceedings related to cases under Title 11. 28 U.S.C. §
1334(b). As used in this statute, the phrase “arising under Title 11” is
meant, not to distinguish between different matters, but to identify
collectively a broad range of matters subject to the bankruptcy
44. Page 42 of 63
jurisdiction of federal courts. Matter of Wood, 825 F.2d 90 (5th
Cir.
1987).
On or about December 16, 2010, Newsome served Debtor (Ladye M. Townsend
[“Townsend”]) with the required: (a) “Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service
of Summons;” and (b) “Waiver of the Service of Summons” which was accompanied by
Notification Accompanying Waiver of Service of Summons. According to United
States Postal Service information, Townsend received these documents on or about
December 27, 2010.
K) INTERLOCUTORY ORDER NOT APPEALABLE: Please see the FIFTH
CIRCUIT Court of Appeals’ decision in, In Re Bobby Ray Foust, 96 Fed. Appx. 940; 2004
U.S. App. LEXIS 1217 at EXHIBIT “G” attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein which states in part:
PROCEDURAL POSTURE: The United States District Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi reversed the bankruptcy court's decision
holding appellees liable for failing to turn over property of the appellant debtors'
bankruptcy estate. The district court also reversed on the issue of damages,
remanded for further development of expert testimony regarding valuation, and
remanded for consideration of the debtors' advice of counsel defense. The
debtors appealed.
OVERVIEW: The parties did not contest the appellate court's jurisdiction.
The appellate court raised the issue of jurisdiction sua sponte and found that the
district court's decision was not a "final decision" under 28 U.S.C.S. § 158(d).
The district court reversed and remanded to the bankruptcy court for further
consideration of adequate protection, expert testimony regarding valuation, and
the appellees' advice of counsel defense. These issues constituted significant
further proceedings because the bankruptcy court was required to do more than
simply enter judgment. An alternative avenue for jurisdiction was 28 U.S.C.S. §
1291, which governed appeals from final judgments of district courts. The
district court's decision was not final under § 1291 for the same reasons the
district court's decision was not final under § 158(d). Finally, the case did not
meet the standards for an interlocutory appeal, and the district court did not
certify its decision for interlocutory appeal.
OUTCOME: The appellate court dismissed the appeal for lack of appellate
jurisdiction.
[HN1] . . . Remands requiring judicial functions by the bankruptcy court,
for example additional fact-finding, are not final orders and, as such, are
not appealable to the appellate court.
An alternative avenue for jurisdiction in this case is 28 U.S.C. § 1291, which
[HN2] governs appeals from final judgments of district courts. The district
court's decision is not final under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 for the same reasons the
district court's decision is not final under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). See In re Nichols,
21 F.3d at 692. Finally, this case does not meet the standards for an
interlocutory appeal, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), and the district court did not
certify its decision for interlocutory appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
45. Page 43 of 63
87. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court LACKS
JURISDICTION to preside over Debtor Ladye M. Townsend’s Bankruptcy claims
under the FIRST-TO-FILE Rule!
88. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that from the ONSET of Debtor Townsend’s
Bankruptcy action, Creditor Newsome has REPEATEDLY CONTESTED this
Bankruptcy Court’s Jurisdiction.
89. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court’s and/or Judge
Edward Ellington’s 06/07/16 Order Denying Motion To Reopen Case . . .(DOCKET
No. 78) is MERELY a FRIVOLOUS Order and that NO “FINAL Judgment” has been
entered! Thus, this Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward Ellington have ERRED in
advising Newsome to bring an APPEAL action.
90. The Record EVIDENCE will support that this Bankruptcy Court and/or Judge Edward
Ellington DID KNOWINGLY advise Creditor Newsome to file an Appeal for
purposes of UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY EXTORTING and/or EMBEZZLING
monies (MASKED as Filing Fees) from Creditor Newsome.
91. The Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN that this Bankruptcy Court’s and/or Judge
Edward Ellington’s 06/07/16 Order Denying Motion To Reopen. . .(DOCKET No. 78)
is NOT a FINAL Judgment and any APPEAL on said Order and INSTRUCTIONS by
this Court would be FRIVOLOUS and REJECTED due to the 06/07/16
INTERLOCUTORY Order!
II. TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION VIOLATIONS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Through this instant Bankruptcy action that Creditor
Vogel Newsome does hereby TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY put this Court and Opposing
Parties on NOTICE of the Constitutional Violations set forth above in this instant
“CVNOT06/07/16ORDER” as well as in Creditor Newsome’s PREVIOUS filings with this Bankruptcy
Court!
III. TIMELY NOTIFICATION OF INFRINGEMENT
UPON CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: Through this instant Bankruptcy action that Creditor
Vogel Newsome does hereby TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY put this Court and Opposing
46. Page 44 of 63
Parties on NOTICE of the INFRINGEMENT UPON the Constitutional Rights of Creditor Newsome as
set forth above in this instant “CVNOT06/07/16ORDER” as well as in Creditor Newsome’s PREVIOUS
filings with this Bankruptcy Court!
IV. REQUEST TO BE ADVISED OF CONFLICT-OF-
INTERESTS
Creditor Vogel Newsome request through this instant Bankruptcy action as well as
INCORPORATES request(s) submitted in PREVIOUS filings with this Court to be advised of the
CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS that appears to be present in this Court’s and/or Judge Edward
Ellington’s handling of this case.
V. REITERATION OF MOTION FOR RECUSAL OF
JUDGE EDWARD ELLINGTON
Creditor Vogel Newsome REITERATES her DEMAND that this Bankruptcy Court’s Judge
Edward Ellington IMMEDIATELY RECUSE himself from this Bankruptcy action. In support thereof,
Creditor herein INCORPORATES the claims and defenses set forth in PREVIOUS Filings (as set forth
in Docket Nos. 41, 52, 64, 67, 70, 73, and 77) as if set forth in full herein!
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: That Creditor Vogel Newsome IS CONFIDENT that
INVESTIGATIONS in to Judge Edward Ellington’s handling of this Bankruptcy matter WILL
SUSTAIN that CONFLICT-OF-INTERESTS exist, thus, making him UNFIT/UNJUST and
UNQUALIFIED to proceed as the Judge in this Bankruptcy Action. Furthermore, SUPPORTING
WILLFUL, MALICIOUS and WANTON behavior by Judge Edward Ellington in his ZEALOUS efforts
to fulfill his roles in the CONSPIRACIES leveled against Vogel Denise Newsome on behalf of his
LEGAL COUNSEL Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and, said
Law Firm’s other PARTIES/CLIENTS with an interest in the outcome of this Bankruptcy Action.
47. Page 45 of 63
The record evidence will support that this Court as well as Judge Edward Ellington has been
TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY notified and requested to address the CONFLICT-OF-
INTEREST PRESENT; however, has BLATANTLY refused in his QUEST and ZEAL to fulfill his
ROLES in the CONSPIRACIES leveled against Newsome by him, his Legal Counsel and opposing
counsel and their CLIENTS having in INTEREST in the outcome of this Bankruptcy Action.
VI. NOTIFICATION TO THE PUBLIC and
WORLD/FOREIGN LEADERS
Creditor Newsome believes that the Record EVIDENCE will SUSTAIN the PUBLIC’s and/or
the WORLD/FOREIGN Leaders’ INTEREST in the information that she shares through her Bankruptcy
and/or Court pleadings and that said INTEREST(s) is sparked by EVIDENCE and the EXPOSURE of
the CORRUPTION of the United States of America’s CORRUPT Judicial System and HOW it appears
it is being CONTROLLED and MANIPULATED by the KLAN’S Law Firm of Baker Donelson
Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz for purposes of PROMOTING its RACIALLY and
DISCRIMINATORY practices against People-Of-Color as Creditor Newsome and/or NATIONS-OF-
COLOR!
WHETHER FILED or NOT (due to the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES
leveled against Creditor Newsome), this pleading WILL BE MADE
AVAILABLE for PUBLIC viewing to the WORLD/FOREIGN Leaders due to
the OVERWHELMING Domestic and International Interests in Creditor Vogel
Newsome’s COMMUNITY Activist and/or CIVIL RIGHTS Activist work!
48. Page 46 of 63
Creditor Vogel Newsome made it clear in the pleadings filed in this instant Bankruptcy action
the GOAL of “TAKING DOWN” of the WHITE SUPREMACIST’s and JEW’s/ZIONIST’s WALL
STREET! As this Court can see, OTHER Governments are PAYING attention as well as are WAKING
UP and TAKING the NECESSARY PRECAUTIONARY steps to DUMP U.S. TREASURIES and RID
THEMSELVES of TIES to the United States’ DESPOTISM Government Regime that is presently being
CONTROLLED by WHITE SUPREMACIST Groups as the KU KLUX KLAN and JEWS/ZIONISTS!
49. Page 47 of 63
LOOK at the United States’ MASSIVE DEBT
and WHO they OWE!
50. Page 48 of 63
LOOK at all of the MONEY GIVEN to the United States’
DESPOTISM Government Regime!
MONEY Being USED To FINANCE The
UNITED STATES’ TERRORIST Government Regime!
NOT MUCH HAS CHANGED SINCE 2011 and it is GETTING WORSE!
http://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/debt-usa3norwayindiafrance
51. Page 49 of 63
A QUESTION BEING PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC/WORLD:
HOW WERE SMALL WHITE SUPREMACISTS and JEWS/ZIONISTS GROUPS
ALLOWED TO HIJACKTHE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S GOVERNMENT
And CREATE A CORPORATION
UNDER WHICH IT IS ALLEGED TO BE OPERATING?
While this appears to sound a little FAR FETCHED, Creditor Vogel Newsome looks forward
to looking into the AUTHENTICITY of such allegations because, IF TRUE, the LEGAL and
LAWFUL “OVERTHROW” of a DESPOTISM Government Regime will be INEVITABLE! For
instance there are those who may not know:
(1) That WASHINGTON, D.C. is NOT a part of the United States of America’s STATES!
(2) Has NO Representtion in the United States Senate!
Washington, D.C, which is MERELY a DISTRICT and on a SMALL Parcel
of Land out of which it is alleged this FRAUDULENT and DECEPTIVE CORPORATION
and its TERRORIST Counterparts are conducting BUSINESS!
52. Page 50 of 63
HOW WERE SUCH SMALL TERRORIST GROUPS AS
THIS DECEPTIVE CORPORATION
WHOSE ALLEGED HEADQUARTERS IS
THE UNITED STATES WHITE HOUSE
AND ITS WHITE SUPREMACISTS and
JEWISH/ZIONIST COUNTERPARTS
WITH ALLEGED HEADQUARTERS IN
THE UNITED KINGDOM and ISRAEL
ALLOWED TO GET CONTROL OF
GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF
PUSHING THEIR WHITE SUPREMACIST
AND ZIONIST PERVERTED RELIGIOUS AGENDAS?
54. Page 52 of 63
DID YOU KNOW THAT TO SERVE ON
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
YOU HAVE TO BE EITHER JEWISH OR CATHOLIC?
HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?
HOPEFULLY, THIS WILL EXPLAIN
THE “PERVERTED” DECISIONS
HANDED DOWN FROM THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
THAT CATER TO THEIR BELIEFS
55. Page 53 of 63
AND THEN THE USE OF THE
ZIONIST-CONTROLLED MEDIA
NETWORKS TO FORCE THEIR
LIFESTYLE AND BELIEFS DOWN
THE THROATS OF THOSE
WHO OPPOSE!
57. Page 55 of 63
U.S. v. Jimenez Recio, 123 S.Ct. 819 (2003) -
Essence of a conspiracy is an agreement to commit
an unlawful act.
Agreement to commit an unlawful act, which
constitutes the essence of a conspiracy, is a distinct
evil that may exist and be punished whether or not
the substantive crime ensues. Id.
Conspiracy poses a threat to the public over
and above the threat of the commission of the
relevant substantive crime, both because the
combination in crime makes more likely the
commission of other crimes and because it
decreases the probability that the individuals
involved will depart from their path of criminality.
Id.
DID YOU KNOW THAT WHEN SUCH
PERVERSIONS AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACIES
ARE ALLOWED TO GO UNPUNISH,
THESE WHITE SUPREMACISTS AND ZIONISTS
WILL CONTINUE ON THEIR
“PATH OF CRIMINALITY”
AND FRAME OTHERS FOR THEIR CRIMES
WHILE USING THEIR MEDIA NETWORKS
TO EXPLOIT AND MAGNIFY THEIR TERRORIST ACTS?
58. Page 56 of 63
FOR INSTANCE,
DID YOU KNOW THAT
THE KLAN’S LAW FIRM
BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ
IS ALSO LEGAL COUNSEL TO
THE UNITED STATES AND
HAS AN OFFICE IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA?