17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE This is the 05/09/17, RESPONSE to the 05/08/17 EEOC Telephone Conference with Willie Schaffer. During this Conference, Community Activist Vogel Denise Newsome advised of concerns of obstructing justice, etc. and perhaps the need to contact the United States Department of Justice – i.e. in which she also referenced pleadings of the FBI being 300+ Pages since the length of her Charge was the reason Willie Schaffer had advised it was NOT sent to First Heritage Credit. https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/notice-of-eeoc-complaint-against-1-st-heritage-credit-llc-filed The EEOC TYPEWRITTEN Charge request Investigations; therefore, a reasonable mind may conclude that Donald Trump’s TERMINATION Letter to FBI Director James Comey referencing confirmation he was not under INVESTIGATION. PEACE & POWER (513) 680-2922

1. 05/09/2017 RESPONSE TO TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH
EEOC’s WILLIE SCHAFFER
REGARDING STATUS OF EEOC INVESTIGATION
During the Monday, May 8, 2017,
Telephone Conference with Willie
Schaffer in the Jackson, Mississippi
EEOC Office, he advised of moving
this EEOC Charge, “Up the Chain.”
Did Community Activist Vogel Denise
Newsome’s 05/09/17 Fax and Email
to Willie Schaffer and his Superiors
result in the TRUE reasons for FBI
Director James Comey’s FIRING?
17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE

2. Page 1 of 10
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI
VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME
(Complainant)
vs.
FIRST HERITAGE CREDIT LLC
(Respondent)
CHARGE NO. 423-2015-00802
FACSIMILE
TO:
CC:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) – Jackson, MS
ATTN: Willie Schaffer - Enforcement Supervisor
VIA EMAIL: willie.schaffer@eeoc.gov and
FACSIMILE NO. (601)948-8401
EEOC OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS
FACSIMILE NO. – Washington, DC (202) 663-7022
ATTN: Delner Franklin-Thomas (Area Director) – Birmingham District
Office
FACSIMILE NO. (205) 212-2105
Mississippi U.S. Congressman Bennie Thompson
FACSIMILE NO. – Bolton, MS (601) 866-9036
FACSIMILE NO. – Washington, DC (202) 225-5876
FROM: Vogel Denise Newsome
RE: 05/08/2017 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH WILLIE SCHAEFFER
REGARDING STATUS OF EEOC INVESTIGATION
U.S. EEOC – Jackson, Mississippi (Area Office) – Charge/Case No. 423-2015-
00802
REQUEST TO BE ADVISE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
DATE: May 9, 2017
This is to confirm our telephone conference on yesterday (Monday, May 8,
2017) in the above referenced EEOC Charge. Regarding some of the issues raised and
discussed today, the EVIDENCE to support is already in the records of the EEOC
regarding this Charge. In further support PLEASE NOTE:

3. Page 2 of 10
1. During our conversation, you/the EEOC advised of the Area
Director Delner Franklin-Thomas’ November 15, 2017
correspondence/ documentation noting the following:
As I shared with you/the EEOC, this issue
was addressed in my December 2016
Response which states in part:

4. Page 3 of 10
From our telephone conference on yesterday, you
projected yourself as being ignorant of the FACT that I had
submitted a December 2016 Response to Mrs. Delner-Franklin’s
11/15/16 documentation/correspondence (i.e. Letter and
Revocation) and you did NOT see my 12/2016 Response. While
the EEOC’s record contains a copy of my December 8, 2016
Response, you were advised that documents regarding this
Charge (due to the Public/International Interest) are posed in
Internet Forums. You/The EEOC may also find copies of this
Response at the following links wherein they are hereby
incorporated as if set out in full herein
SLIDESHARE:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/120816-fax-
response-to-111516-eeoc-correspondence-from-delner-
franklinthomas-first-heritage-credit

5. Page 4 of 10
2. PLEASE BE ADVISED that the 01/09/17 “Statement of
Position” from First Heritage Credit LLC within 30 DAYS of
my 12/08/17 Response SUPPORTS NOT only the RE-
OPENING of the EEOC Charge but the REVOCATION and the
APPLICATION of the “TOLLING DOCTRINE” for any such
FRIVOLOUS claims that a Lawsuit HAD TO BE FILED within
90 DAYS of receipt of the 02/20/15 “Dismissal and Notice of
Rights!”
Moreover, the IRONY of such acts by the EEOC’s Wilma
Jones, is that she DELIBERATELY and MALICIOUSLY
FAILED to advise me of right to APPEAL her and/or the
EEOC’s 02/20/15 Decision in her CRIMINAL acts to AID and
ABET First Heritage Credit LLC with its WHITE
Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists Conspirators/Co-
Conspirators!
3. My EEOC Appeal as well as the EEOC Records WILL REFLECT
the TIMELY submittal as well as MULTIPLE Branches of the
EEOC being provided with a copy of same – i.e. moreover, such
ERROR(s) have been TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY
submitted to the EEOC on such issues! The ERROR in the
EEOC’s assertion of having to bring a lawsuit in 90 Days
was ALSO addressed in my December 8, 2016 FAX
Response as noted below and is hereby incorporated as if
set forth in full herein:

6. Page 5 of 10
`
4. 0n 04/18/15, I submitted an Appeal WITHIN 30 Days to the
EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations as EVIDENCED above and
copies of which may be found at the following links and are
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full herein!
SLIDESHARE:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/041815-
appealpetition-to-eeoc-newsome-vs-first-heritage-credit-
matter
5. You and the EEOC were advised that according to its OWN
Policies and Procedures regarding “Position Statements,”
etc. that it MANDATORILY requires that “EACH” of the Claims
raised in a Complaint/Charge is to be answered. During our
conversation, you were advised that, as a matter of LAW, I can
file a TYPEWRITTEN Complaint/Charge and I DID! The EEOC
Charge in this matter was drafted in accordance with
Guidelines and with NUMBERED Paragraphs that
MANDATORILY require that the Employer and/or Respondent
provide a RESPONSE to EACH of the Claims raised. However,
First Heritage Credit LLC was DEPRIVED the opportunity to do
so because the EEOC DELIBERATELY (i.e. I believe with
MALICIOUS Intent) WITHHELD my 310+ Page Complaint that
had SUPPORTING Exhibits FROM First Heritage Credit LLC.

7. Page 6 of 10
A reasonable mind may conclude that the
WITHHOLDING my TYPEWRITTEN 310+ Page Complaint
and SUPPORTING Exhibits may be efforts by the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and its
Employees to OBSTRUCT Justice and the ADMINISTRATION
OF JUSTICE, etc. Moreover, to AID and ABET First Heritage
Credit LLC and it Conspirators/Co-Conspirators in the
TERRORIST/RACIST/DISCRIMINATORY practices that WHITE
Jews/Zionists and WHITE Supremacists Employers and their
Employees have LAUNCHED against me in their SYSTEMATIC
practices, etc. EVIDENCED in the records!
6. You/The EEOC advised of the Legal Citations provided in my
04/10/17 Response. Thank you for CONFIRMING
KNOWLEDGE of such CRUCIAL information as well as the
“BLACK-on-BLACK” Discrimination and the PRIMA FACIE
information that was submitted explaining this information –
i.e. using Francis vs. AT&T -
Rebecca FRANCIS, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND
TELEGRAPH COMPANY, LONG LINES DEPARTMENT, Defendant
No. 2800-68
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA
55 F.R.D. 202; 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13903; 4 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas.
(BNA) 777; 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) P7811
in that you advised of your LACK-OF-KNOWLEDGE that such
cases of this type of Discrimination (Black-on-Black) has been
found! Perhaps providing the above information will assist in
SHOWING the EEOC’s KNOWLEDGE of such matters! YES,
that is WHAT WHITE Employers will do as First Heritage Credit
LLC did in efforts of ESCAPING Liability – i.e. use the BLACK vs
BLACK Defense!
PLEASE BE ADVISED that ALL First Heritage Credit
could do in their “Statement of Position” was FLOOD it with
CITATIONS; however, I took the TIME in my EEOC Charge as
well as in my RESPONSES to PRINT OUT and provide
INFORMATION of the Case Laws used to SUSTAIN my claims
and/or charges which TO DATE (05/09/17), REMAINS
UNCONTESTED by First Heritage Credit LLC as well as the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)!

8. Page 7 of 10
7. First Heritage Credit LLC in its 01/09/17 “Statement of
Position” REPEATEDLY addresses meeting the THRESHOLD
REQUIREMENTS known as “Prima Facie!” In so doing, my
04/10/17 Response clearly INCORPORATES and sets forth in
the 02/2015 310+ TYPEWRITTEN Complaint/Charge that I
set forth the Prima Facie Requirements as well as provided
EVIDENCE to SUPPORT my claims; however, as shared, First
Heritage Credit LLC FAILED to provide any FACTUAL Evidence
to REBUT that presented by me and was UNABLE to provide
CASE Laws with EVIDENCE to rebut that provided in the 310+
Page EEOC TYPEWRITTEN Charge/Complaint!
A copy of my 02/2015 TYPEWRITTEN 310+
TYPEWRITTEN Page Complaint/Charge may be found at the
following Links:
SLIDESHARE:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/notice-of-eeoc-
complaint-against-1-st-heritage-credit-llc-filed
8. PLEASE ADVISE of the STATUS of this Appeal within 10
DAYS (by May 19, 2017). This request is being submitted in
GOOD FAITH in the preservation of PROTECTED Rights that it
appears the EEOC is attempting to INFRINGE upon – i.e.
moreover, concerns of efforts by the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to take a FAR
DEPARTURE from its Policies and Procedures for purposes
of DEPRIVING me Equal Protection of the Laws, Due
Process of Laws, etc. that it has AFFORDED to others in its
bringing of CIVIL LAWSUITS in Federal Courts on behalf of other
Complainants for SIMILAR employment violations to which I
(Vogel Denise Newsome)/Complainant address in my EEOC
Charge. The EVIDENCE of EEOC’s DISCRIMINATORY practices
and FAR DEPARTURE are EVIDENCED in the Case Laws that
have been presented in previous filings submitted in this EEOC
Charge!
9. PLEASE ADVISE of ALL “CONFLICTS-Of-INTEREST” that
exist in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s
(EEOC) handling of this Charge/Complaint within 10 DAY (by
May 19, 2017).
10. You advised that you are going to “PUSH this Charge UP THE
CHAIN” based on the information provided to you and/or the

9. Page 8 of 10
EEOC on April 10, 2017, as well as the FACT that this EEOC
Charge was FILED in February 2015! Wherein, to DATE, there
has been NO EEOC Decision regarding my EEOC Charge
AGAINST First Heritage Credit LLC. You and the EEOC have
been TIMELY advised that the 02/20/2015 “Dismissal and
Notice of Rights” was AGAINST a Company by the name of First
Heritage Credit Union and such an ERROR would be a
DEFENSE used by First Heritage Credit LLC to AVOID
Liability! Not only that, as I shared, from research, it appears
that First Heritage Credit Union is a BLACK Owned Business –
i.e. could that by the reason that the EEOC and First Heritage
Credit LLC is attempting to THROW them into this Lawsuit as my
Employer when they ARE NOT?
11. You and the EEOC were advised of the PUBLIC/WORLD
INTEREST in the handling of this Complaint/Charge; moreover,
SYSTEMATIC Discrimination presented that First Heritage
Credit LLC made SURE to STEER CLEAR OF!
12. You and the EEOC were advised to get FAMILIAR with the
FACTS as well as take the time to READ and REVIEW the 310+
TYPEWRITTEN Complaint/Charge as MANDATORILY required
in the handling of INVESTIGATIONS!
13. You and/or the EEOC were advised of the PUBLIC’s VIEW of the
EEOC being a Government Agency with Employees that just
want to be LAZY and NOT do their JOBS!
14. From my research, the EEOC has a “COMPLIANCE MANUAL”
which sets forth HOW INVESTIGATIONS into the
Charges/Complaints are to be handled. A copy of the EEOC’s
Compliance Manual may be found at the following Link and is
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full herein.

10. Page 9 of 10
SLIDESHARE:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/eeoc-compliance-
manual-highlighted-11575603
PLEASE ADVISE within 10 Days (i.e. May 19, 2017),
whether you and the EEOC are INVESTIGATING my EEOC
Charge in accordance to the MANDATORY Requirements set
forth in the “EEOC COMPLIANCE MANUAL?”
15. During my Research, I came across a document entitled, “EEO
Management Directives” explaining HOW Federal Employee’s
EEO Charges/Complaints are to be handled! This document is
WELL over 300 Pages; therefore, providing some insight that a
300+ Page TYPEWRITTEN Complaint submitted by me against
my former Employer (First Heritage Credit), is NOT unusual
and/or are grounds for the EEOC’s FAILURE to read it – i.e.
even the Federal Bureau of Investigation has filed Complaints
WELL over 300 Pages! In support of “FAR DEPARTURE” by
the EEOC in the handling of my EEOC Charge/Claims, I hereby
INCOPORATE the “EEO Management Directives” at the
following link as if set forth in full herein!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/eeoc-eeo-
management-directives-as-of-080515-74839980

11. Page 10 of 10
This “EEO Management Directives” is VERY THOROUGH on
HOW Charges/Claims are to be handled!
PLEASE BE ADVISED, that I expect the EEOC to handle
my Charge of Discrimination in accordance with the Policies
and/or Procedures set out in the “EEO Management Directives”
and all other applicable Manuals governing the handling and
processing of Equal Employment Opportunity Charges/Claims
and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Charges/Claims!
Mr. Schaffer, should you and/or the EEOC have further questions,
please do not hesitate to contact Complainant Vogel Denise Newsome at (513)
680-2922 and by mail at Post Office Box 31265, Jackson, Mississippi 39286.
Respectfully Submitted,
Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265
Jackson, MS 39286
PHONE: (513) 680-2922